Mujhe lgta h aisi movies promote honi chahiye because hame inspiration milti h awaz uthane ki galat ke khilaf khade hone kiii sacchi ghatna pe adharit movies obviously promote honi chahiye na ki animal jaisi ghatiya movies... Jisme ham intolerance, angryness, bad language seekhte h
This movie is not average, this is the best movie about religious fraudsters. They didn't harmed dharma they targeted only pakhandi babas. I love the whole movie.❤❤
Mujhe samjh nhi aata karsandas mulji jaise naam humari history ki kitabo main kyu nahi hai?.....hume aise veero ki kahani movies aur series se pata chalti hai, but inhone kaam aisa kiya tha ki aaj unke marne ke baad bhi unhone aaj ki generation ko sochne pr majboor kr diya ki karsandas mulji naam ka bhi koi 80's ke time hua tha jo dharm main ek naya badlaw laaya.....❤ And viraaj was his 3rd wife.
Aj ke time me bhi aisa hota he ... Kuch samaj ki nazar me aa jate he kuch chipe rahte he.. Agar ye film sabhi ne dekha to sabhi ki andhshradha khatam ho sakti he 🙏 is film ko har ghar aur har family ko dekhna hi chahiye ... Taki netikta aur dharam aur andh bhakti / shradha ... Dharam guru ke pap jaal me na fase ... Parmatma se upar koi nhi he ... Aur unka dharam insaniyat he na ki dharam guru ki aisi Charan seva 🙏mujhe ye film bahot achhi lagi aur zarurat se duniya isko dekhe aur samjhe dharam ke naam par bune huwe janjaal ko... Thankyou
Aur ye film to real me ghati hui sachhi khatna par adharit he ... Logo ki jagrukta zaruri he... Kyoki aj bhi dharam guru ke pratisthit logo ke sirf naam badle he par vyabhichar , atyachar , shoshan , anyay aj bhi ho raha he ... Kuch ka samaj ke samne aa jata he aur kuch ka chipa rahta he , to vo white colour bane rahte he... Par parmatma ki nazar se kuch nhi chipa aur unke upar koi nhi ... Yaha ke supreme court se bacha ja sakta he par vaha ke suprime court aur supreme judge parmatma se koi nhi Bach sakta🙏 jai ho sanatan dharam ki ...
The film focuses extensively on falsehoods about Karsandas Mulji, presenting him as a devout follower of Lord Krishna and a believer in Puranic deities, which contradicts historical records and his own statements in Maharaj Libel case. In reality, Karsandas Mulji was a critic of Puranic deities and did not believe in the stories of Lord Krishna's Ras Leela, which he described as false and amorous. His statements during the Maharaj Libel case, documented in his Gujarati newspaper "Satya Prakash" on October 21, 1860, reflect his disbelief in the Puranic texts and his systematic attack on Hinduism as part of a broader British colonial conspiracy. 1. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that all the Hindū Sanātana sects arisen in KaliYug are false “…the sect of the Maharajas has arisen in the KaliYug, therefore, according to the doctrines of the Shastras, it must be false ...” - “Satyaprakash” Gujarati Newspaper of 21st Oct, 1860 by Karsandas Mooljee
2. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that the stories of Lord Krishna, Gopees, Raas lila are false and amorous.
“…The story of the "gopees" and the incarnations of Vishnoo are believed in by several sects, but are opposed to the ancient religion. The Shaivites believe in the incarnations of Vishnoo equally with the Vaishnayas. As far as I have reacl, all the sacred books do not contain amorous passages. I am not aware whether Sir William Jones has said that "Krishna is to this day the darling god of Hindū women." I have heard the story of Brahma coming out of an egg after remaining three millions and millions of years. I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Veds, which 1 have not read. The stories are considered by most Vaishnavas are literally true…” - Karsandas Mooljee, cross-examination by Mr. Bayley as part of Maharaj libel case proceedings (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249)
3. Karsandas Mooljee accepting that he has not read the Hindū Sanātana texts and does not believe in any texts apart from Veds. Hindū Sanātana believes in multiple texts as its foundational and core texts including Ved, Puranas, Smriti, Tantra agama, Itihaas, and Vedant.
“…I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Vedas, which 1 have not read…” - (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249) Inaccuracies in the movie (as compared to Maharaj Libel case proceedings) The movie contains several inaccuracies regarding the beliefs and practices of the Pushtimarg sect. During the trial, the movie shows Karsandas explaining the correct meaning of Brahma Sambandh to the court, which was that all things are to be offered only to Lord Krishna and not to the Maharaja. However, this stand was actually taken by Jadunathji Maharaj in the real-life proceedings of the Maharaj Libel case. In fact, Karsandas Mulji maliciously and scandalously tried to prove to the court, by mistranslating the commentary verses of the Brahma Sambandh mantra by Gokulnathji (one of the Acharyas of Pushtimarg), and twisting the translation to mean that everything should be offered to the Maharaja and not to Krishna. This portrayal presents views that are far from the reality about Karsandas. The dialogues delivered on Brahma Sambandh by Karsandas in the movie were actually said by Jadunathji Maharaj as per the Maharaj Libel case proceedings. In the film "Maharaj," the facts of the historical Maharaj Libel case have been significantly distorted, especially in the pivotal trial scene. The movie inaccurately portrays the dialogue exchange between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj concerning the Brahmasambandha mantra, thereby misleading the audience about the actual events and character representations. Misrepresentation of Dialogues In the movie, the dialogues between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj during the trial are swapped, leading to a skewed portrayal of their respective positions. The film shows Jadunathji Maharaj accepting the Brahmasambandha mantra to mean that followers must offer their wives to the Maharajas. This is a gross mis-presentation of the historical records. In reality, it was Karsandas Mulji who presented this erroneous and defamatory interpretation in the court, not Jadunathji Maharaj. Historical Facts According to the actual case proceedings, it was Karsandas Mulji who twisted the meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra to suggest that the entire sect, including its original Acharyas, endorsed heretical practices. This misrepresentation aimed to malign the Pushtimarg sect and its spiritual leaders. Karsandas's allegations were part of a broader attempt to depict the sect as morally corrupt and its practices as deviant. Jadunathji Maharaj's Defense Contrary to the film's portrayal, Jadunathji Maharaj defended the true meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra in court. He clarified that the mantra meant all offerings should be made to Lord Krishna, not to the Maharajas. Furthermore, Jadunathji Maharaj acknowledged in the court that he was not a deity but a guru, emphasizing his role as a spiritual guide rather than a divine figure. This critical defense by Jadunathji Maharaj was aimed at correcting the false narratives presented by Karsandas Mulji and maintaining the integrity of the Pushtimarg sect's teachings. Character Assassination The film's portrayal of Jadunathji Maharaj as a manipulative and heretical figure is a severe mischaracterization that strays far from the documented reality. By depicting him as someone who endorses immoral practices, the film unjustly vilifies him and misrepresents the true nature of his statements during the trial. This distortion not only damages his reputation but also misleads the audience about the fundamental principles of the Pushtimarg sect.
Now I am nore impressed with Karsandas Mulji. I love hindu upnishads. And I read bhagwat Geeta. But Purans are totally rubbish. Itni bachkani bate hoti hai usme ki kuch pucho mt. Dharm ki shiksha shashwat hoti hai. Jiska koi astitva nahi hai, wo sanatan kaise ho skta hai. Agar wo sanatan hota to aaj bhi hame rakshas wagerh dekhne ko milte. Jisne bhi upnishad geeta, ashtavakra geeta likha hai mai unki abhari hu. Bhut mahan granth hai, ab na to ese granth ban skte hai na banege, Lekin mai puri trh se puran virodhi hu kyuki uska Aaj ke jiwan se koi lena dena nahi hai, or itni murkhtapurn bate honi bhi ni chahiye. Shayad logo ko dar se asli dharam ka palan karwane ke liye or logo me interest bnane ke liye। ye bakwas bate likhi gyi thi. Kyuki us samay kisse kahaniyo ka bahut chalan tha.
@@99stranger Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
@@pks2648these type of incidents happened in past like charanseva n exploiting women by pundit brahmin. So please read history.. In films they may use cinematic liberty but reality is that there types of things happened in our so called civilized society.
Jab muslimo ke Dharma guruwo ke bare me halala jaisi movie banaii jati hai tin talak jaisi prathaa ko darshaya jata hai tab India ki public kaha rehti hai bhaiii usko bhi to criticise krna chahiye 🙏😠
पहले अपने दिमाग का इलाज कराओ, बच्चा भी इस बात को समझ जाएगा कि ये movie भगवान को गलत बोलने के लिए नही बनी है, धर्म के नाम पर आशाराम जैसे बलात्कारियों और असली शास्त्रों का गलत अर्थ परोसने वालों पर बनी है। और ऐसे एक नही हजार उदाहरण इतिहास में मिल जाएंगे। अगर इसमें अब भी खेद है, तो कृपया भेज देना अपनी पत्नी या बेटी को ऐसे पाखंडी के पास।
It's not an average movie .... Jisko history me interest he or history janta he uske liye it's good.
unke liye bhi average hi thi, as such kuchh oustanding nhi tha.
Watched 'Maharaj' instead Of Stree 2 ...
And Its Worth It ♥️
Salute To Every One 🙏🏼
Mujhe lgta h aisi movies promote honi chahiye because hame inspiration milti h awaz uthane ki galat ke khilaf khade hone kiii sacchi ghatna pe adharit movies obviously promote honi chahiye na ki animal jaisi ghatiya movies... Jisme ham intolerance, angryness, bad language seekhte h
Nd aurton ko objective ki trh treat kerte h
🎉 B9 😮 c 😊
Kya bhaii kya mtlb h iska???@@Sangeetchannel-m2j
Exactly...
This movie is not average, this is the best movie about religious fraudsters.
They didn't harmed dharma they targeted only pakhandi babas.
I love the whole movie.❤❤
Junaid has done his work exceptionally promising
Mujhe samjh nhi aata karsandas mulji jaise naam humari history ki kitabo main kyu nahi hai?.....hume aise veero ki kahani movies aur series se pata chalti hai, but inhone kaam aisa kiya tha ki aaj unke marne ke baad bhi unhone aaj ki generation ko sochne pr majboor kr diya ki karsandas mulji naam ka bhi koi 80's ke time hua tha jo dharm main ek naya badlaw laaya.....❤ And viraaj was his 3rd wife.
80's nhi 1862
It’s not average it’s amazing
Bohat achhi movie hai block buster
Aj ke time me bhi aisa hota he ... Kuch samaj ki nazar me aa jate he kuch chipe rahte he..
Agar ye film sabhi ne dekha to sabhi ki andhshradha khatam ho sakti he 🙏 is film ko har ghar aur har family ko dekhna hi chahiye ... Taki netikta aur dharam aur andh bhakti / shradha ... Dharam guru ke pap jaal me na fase ...
Parmatma se upar koi nhi he ...
Aur unka dharam insaniyat he na ki dharam guru ki aisi Charan seva 🙏mujhe ye film bahot achhi lagi aur zarurat se duniya isko dekhe aur samjhe dharam ke naam par bune huwe janjaal ko... Thankyou
Aur ye film to real me ghati hui sachhi khatna par adharit he ... Logo ki jagrukta zaruri he... Kyoki aj bhi dharam guru ke pratisthit logo ke sirf naam badle he par vyabhichar , atyachar , shoshan , anyay aj bhi ho raha he ... Kuch ka samaj ke samne aa jata he aur kuch ka chipa rahta he , to vo white colour bane rahte he... Par parmatma ki nazar se kuch nhi chipa aur unke upar koi nhi ... Yaha ke supreme court se bacha ja sakta he par vaha ke suprime court aur supreme judge parmatma se koi nhi Bach sakta🙏 jai ho sanatan dharam ki ...
Sahi kaha hamare dharm mein aisi cheeze nhi hoti aise log hamare dharm ko barbaad karte hai
Bhai information se jada background sound ara usko thoda kam volume me lagao information me dikkat ari hai 😢
Aamir sir , ko Halala par bhi movie banani chiye , with same actor ,because inki acting behetarin he.😊
Uspe poora series or film hai be magar itna lafra nahi hua tha😂
Incredible intro ❤
I really loved the movie. The movie actually says stop with superstitions and follow the religious books properly instead of listening to fake babas
Amazing movie gonna watch ❤❤❤
Outstanding ❤
Good brother make more videos like this 😮😮😮
Wow! Very nice informative video
Great...❤
Good knowledge keep it up 👍
Kaafi time baad😊
Kya baat hai bro 🥳
Super movie
Maharaj ki real pic konsi hai
Nice one, good one!!
❤❤❤
But who is viraaj
Hope this tym u stay little longer
The film focuses extensively on falsehoods about Karsandas Mulji, presenting him as a devout follower of Lord Krishna and a believer in Puranic deities, which contradicts historical records and his own statements in Maharaj Libel case. In reality, Karsandas Mulji was a critic of Puranic deities and did not believe in the stories of Lord Krishna's Ras Leela, which he described as false and amorous. His statements during the Maharaj Libel case, documented in his Gujarati newspaper "Satya Prakash" on October 21, 1860, reflect his disbelief in the Puranic texts and his systematic attack on Hinduism as part of a broader British colonial conspiracy.
1. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that all the Hindū Sanātana sects arisen in KaliYug are false
“…the sect of the Maharajas has arisen in the KaliYug, therefore, according to the doctrines of the Shastras, it must be false ...” - “Satyaprakash” Gujarati Newspaper of 21st Oct, 1860 by Karsandas Mooljee
2. Karsandas Mooljee’s allegation that the stories of Lord Krishna, Gopees, Raas lila are false and amorous.
“…The story of the "gopees" and the incarnations of Vishnoo are believed in by several sects, but are opposed to the ancient religion. The Shaivites believe in the
incarnations of Vishnoo equally with the Vaishnayas. As far as I have reacl, all the sacred books do not contain amorous passages. I am not aware whether Sir William Jones has said that "Krishna is to this day the darling god of Hindū women." I have
heard the story of Brahma coming out of an egg after remaining three millions and millions of years. I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Veds, which 1 have not read. The stories are considered by most
Vaishnavas are literally true…” - Karsandas Mooljee, cross-examination by Mr. Bayley as part of Maharaj libel case proceedings (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249)
3. Karsandas Mooljee accepting that he has not read the Hindū Sanātana texts and does not believe in any texts apart from Veds. Hindū Sanātana believes in multiple texts as its foundational and core texts including Ved, Puranas, Smriti, Tantra agama, Itihaas, and Vedant.
“…I do not believe in the modern stories in books which are written after the Vedas, which 1 have not read…” - (Maharaj libel case proceedings, pg. 249)
Inaccuracies in the movie (as compared to Maharaj Libel case proceedings)
The movie contains several inaccuracies regarding the beliefs and practices of the Pushtimarg sect. During the trial, the movie shows Karsandas explaining the correct meaning of Brahma Sambandh to the court, which was that all things are to be offered only to Lord Krishna and not to the Maharaja. However, this stand was actually taken by Jadunathji Maharaj in the real-life proceedings of the Maharaj Libel case. In fact, Karsandas Mulji maliciously and scandalously tried to prove to the court, by mistranslating the commentary verses of the Brahma Sambandh mantra by Gokulnathji (one of the Acharyas of Pushtimarg), and twisting the translation to mean that everything should be offered to the Maharaja and not to Krishna. This portrayal presents views that are far from the reality about Karsandas. The dialogues delivered on Brahma Sambandh by Karsandas in the movie were actually said by Jadunathji Maharaj as per the Maharaj Libel case proceedings.
In the film "Maharaj," the facts of the historical Maharaj Libel case have been significantly distorted, especially in the pivotal trial scene. The movie inaccurately portrays the dialogue exchange between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj concerning the Brahmasambandha mantra, thereby misleading the audience about the actual events and character representations.
Misrepresentation of Dialogues
In the movie, the dialogues between Karsandas Mulji and Jadunathji Maharaj during the trial are swapped, leading to a skewed portrayal of their respective positions. The film shows Jadunathji Maharaj accepting the Brahmasambandha mantra to mean that followers must offer their wives to the Maharajas. This is a gross mis-presentation of the historical records. In reality, it was Karsandas Mulji who presented this erroneous and defamatory interpretation in the court, not Jadunathji Maharaj.
Historical Facts
According to the actual case proceedings, it was Karsandas Mulji who twisted the meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra to suggest that the entire sect, including its original Acharyas, endorsed heretical practices. This misrepresentation aimed to malign the Pushtimarg sect and its spiritual leaders. Karsandas's allegations were part of a broader attempt to depict the sect as morally corrupt and its practices as deviant.
Jadunathji Maharaj's Defense
Contrary to the film's portrayal, Jadunathji Maharaj defended the true meaning of the Brahmasambandha mantra in court. He clarified that the mantra meant all offerings should be made to Lord Krishna, not to the Maharajas. Furthermore, Jadunathji Maharaj acknowledged in the court that he was not a deity but a guru, emphasizing his role as a spiritual guide rather than a divine figure. This critical defense by Jadunathji Maharaj was aimed at correcting the false narratives presented by Karsandas Mulji and maintaining the integrity of the Pushtimarg sect's teachings.
Character Assassination
The film's portrayal of Jadunathji Maharaj as a manipulative and heretical figure is a severe mischaracterization that strays far from the documented reality. By depicting him as someone who endorses immoral practices, the film unjustly vilifies him and misrepresents the true nature of his statements during the trial. This distortion not only damages his reputation but also misleads the audience about the fundamental principles of the Pushtimarg sect.
Now I am nore impressed with Karsandas Mulji.
I love hindu upnishads. And I read bhagwat Geeta. But Purans are totally rubbish. Itni bachkani bate hoti hai usme ki kuch pucho mt. Dharm ki shiksha shashwat hoti hai. Jiska koi astitva nahi hai, wo sanatan kaise ho skta hai. Agar wo sanatan hota to aaj bhi hame rakshas wagerh dekhne ko milte.
Jisne bhi upnishad geeta, ashtavakra geeta likha hai mai unki abhari hu. Bhut mahan granth hai, ab na to ese granth ban skte hai na banege,
Lekin mai puri trh se puran virodhi hu kyuki uska Aaj ke jiwan se koi lena dena nahi hai, or itni murkhtapurn bate honi bhi ni chahiye.
Shayad logo ko dar se asli dharam ka palan karwane ke liye or logo me interest bnane ke liye। ye bakwas bate likhi gyi thi. Kyuki us samay kisse kahaniyo ka bahut chalan tha.
@@99stranger Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
@@99strangerekdam sahi bola bhai ese logo ese bekar Kitabo se Somaj main Kitna gandegi felaya.
@@pks2648these type of incidents happened in past like charanseva n exploiting women by pundit brahmin. So please read history..
In films they may use cinematic liberty but reality is that there types of things happened in our so called civilized society.
Truly inspired by Bapu asaram and other maharaj of same calibre 🤮🤮🤮🤮
Krishna worshiping itself is based on jaar sukh means adultery. It's named as Madhura Bhakti also.
Yehi to problem hai aaj kal logo ki. Acchi movie ko average bolte hai aur maar dhar wali movies ko accha bolte h.
Its not avrage movie bro
Background music bhut jyada h
Music is too loud in video
Music thoda slow dalo bhai ....
New Aamir khan
Kaha goom ho gaye the.....
Background music thoda km kr Bhai bkwas lgta he
But mean carecter kessori or ek ladki thi un logo ka pic nahi hai 😢😢
18vi Sadi me Photo khichvana bahut badi bat mani jati hai
Jab muslimo ke Dharma guruwo ke bare me halala jaisi movie banaii jati hai tin talak jaisi prathaa ko darshaya jata hai tab India ki public kaha rehti hai bhaiii usko bhi to criticise krna chahiye 🙏😠
Behramji Malbari?
Audio quality pr kam karna chahiye
Mujhe lga tha Bhai tu marr gaya...
Jiwant Ahe bhava !!
This movie is based on Muslims. This is why not created hype. Even many people don't know this movie existed
Maino thonek bhi muslim character ko nahi dekha tha is movie mein
Full bakwas movies ....producer is trying to harm Sanatan ashtha
Galat ko galat bolna nyay karna dharm hai ......apki paribhasha alag hai kya
This is based on a true story. Toh history padhle
Pahle history Jan le gawar 😂😂
पहले अपने दिमाग का इलाज कराओ, बच्चा भी इस बात को समझ जाएगा कि ये movie भगवान को गलत बोलने के लिए नही बनी है, धर्म के नाम पर आशाराम जैसे बलात्कारियों और असली शास्त्रों का गलत अर्थ परोसने वालों पर बनी है। और ऐसे एक नही हजार उदाहरण इतिहास में मिल जाएंगे।
अगर इसमें अब भी खेद है, तो कृपया भेज देना अपनी पत्नी या बेटी को ऐसे पाखंडी के पास।
Mai bi hindu and is movie mai kuch galat nhi hai
Dharm ko glt nhi bola