He explaines himself like heaven. I could be listening to him for hours. I'm Spanish and eventhough I understand most of it, the things I dont get, he facilities me the ears to be able to search on google the words on my own rewriting of what I believe I heared.
I think the redefined Ned Kelly look with a mullet was such a great creative choice. It really did create a strong but not tacky Australian character without completely reinventing what we know about Ned Kelly.
I watched Kelly Gang last night, and I really enjoyed it! But I’m American, and have no connection to the Ned Kelly story whatsoever...Complete departure from 1917, but still a great film in its own right! Bottom line: George MacKay is extraordinary and crazy talented! 😍🤩
Researching Australian history before I view this flick. I only know they and the New Zealanders were our allies in the Pacific region during World War II. Looking forward to it.
No quarrel with this bloke, he’s an amazing actor, from the films I’ve seen him in. but why not get an Aussie to play Ned. And before anyone says he was Irish. No he wasn’t. He was Born in beveridge Victoria which makes him Aussie.
Why GET an aussie to play Ned? Not all Australians are blood related to him lmao. It really had no value who plays him. George has done a fantastic job with this film and representing Ned Kelly, and for me, as an Aussie, that's all that really matters 💁♀️
Leesee obviously we’re not all blood related to him lol, look at Heath ledgers Ned Kelly. True to the core of Ned, maybe a bit ponsy imo but still a good Ned Kelly, this Ned Kelly was a weird cross dressing bipolar psycho path. Not saying he couldn’t have been a psycho in real life but he definitely didn’t wear dresses, as an Aussie it was insulting to watch them dismantle a hero down to a lunatic in a dress, that’s just my opinion. And I’m in no way shape or form blaming the actor he’s terrific and did what they asked of him. It’s more the story I disliked and again the fact they could have had a born and bred Aussie play the role. Regardless though a don’t think an Aussie that respected Ned and what he did would have played this role. Only my opinion so don’t get upset at me pls.
Leesee obviously we’re not all blood related to him lol, look at Heath ledgers Ned Kelly. True to the core of Ned, maybe a bit ponsy imo but still a good Ned Kelly, this Ned Kelly was a weird cross dressing bipolar psycho path. Not saying he couldn’t have been a psycho in real life but he definitely didn’t wear dresses, as an Aussie it was insulting to watch them dismantle a hero down to a lunatic in a dress, that’s just my opinion. And I’m in no way shape or form blaming the actor he’s terrific and did what they asked of him. It’s more the story I disliked and again the fact they could have had a born and bred Aussie play the role. Regardless though a don’t think an Aussie that respected Ned and what he did would have played this role. Only my opinion so don’t get upset at me pls.
@@NoXone95 This movie isn't an accurate representation of what actually happened, and who Ned Kelly was. George is apparent about that. It's an interpretation of Ned and his story. He's explained in an interview before about how he wears dresses & lace; something along the lines of Ned Kelly representing what it is to be masculine, but what if being masculine entailed wearing dresses? It's an badass interpretation of what Ned Kelly could have been - simple as that. But agree to disagree I guess
I am actually in love with him
Me tooo😁
a tip: you can watch movies on Flixzone. Me and my gf have been using them for watching all kinds of movies lately.
@Easton Colt definitely, I have been using flixzone} for months myself =)
He explaines himself like heaven. I could be listening to him for hours. I'm Spanish and eventhough I understand most of it, the things I dont get, he facilities me the ears to be able to search on google the words on my own rewriting of what I believe I heared.
I think the redefined Ned Kelly look with a mullet was such a great creative choice. It really did create a strong but not tacky Australian character without completely reinventing what we know about Ned Kelly.
*”We’ll give you a mullet instead.”*
Dude seriously it's not possible that George has no defects
I MEAN LOOK AT HIM
*its not possible that George has defects
Nope. Im really trying to find one but I can’t. He’s perfect 😭
@@millasilveira994 Wow dumb as rocks aren't you.
Ralph Anders ouch
@@emr2710 i guess you did not understand my type of coment. oh and you're pretty rude, uh?
George is the best performer if his generation. Love him!!!
I watched Kelly Gang last night, and I really enjoyed it! But I’m American, and have no connection to the Ned Kelly story whatsoever...Complete departure from 1917, but still a great film in its own right! Bottom line: George MacKay is extraordinary and crazy talented! 😍🤩
ned was irish lol
@@PiratesAndCowboys Ned Kelly always said that he was Australian.
I love George Mackay sm🥺🥺😭😭
He’s amazing in this film
Omg, I love him😍❤
I'm in love with him... I really am... ❤️ He is good looking and sexy... and has a very good height 👌👌👌
He's the only other George I love other than George Harrison
Researching Australian history before I view this flick. I only know they and the New Zealanders were our allies in the Pacific region during World War II. Looking forward to it.
Was just watching Defiance
Fun fact ned kelly had like 8 kids i think a lot of em changed there last name
Actually he was one of 8 kids.
Mr Merryman oh sorry my bad
he looks so tired here :(
i love u geoorrrgeeee lol
No beard?
He was a questionable casting choice for sure but they cast Mick Jagger as him in 1970 so anything is possible with this I guess
No quarrel with this bloke, he’s an amazing actor, from the films I’ve seen him in. but why not get an Aussie to play Ned. And before anyone says he was Irish. No he wasn’t. He was Born in beveridge Victoria which makes him Aussie.
Why GET an aussie to play Ned? Not all Australians are blood related to him lmao. It really had no value who plays him. George has done a fantastic job with this film and representing Ned Kelly, and for me, as an Aussie, that's all that really matters 💁♀️
Leesee obviously we’re not all blood related to him lol, look at Heath ledgers Ned Kelly. True to the core of Ned, maybe a bit ponsy imo but still a good Ned Kelly, this Ned Kelly was a weird cross dressing bipolar psycho path. Not saying he couldn’t have been a psycho in real life but he definitely didn’t wear dresses, as an Aussie it was insulting to watch them dismantle a hero down to a lunatic in a dress, that’s just my opinion. And I’m in no way shape or form blaming the actor he’s terrific and did what they asked of him. It’s more the story I disliked and again the fact they could have had a born and bred Aussie play the role. Regardless though a don’t think an Aussie that respected Ned and what he did would have played this role. Only my opinion so don’t get upset at me pls.
Leesee obviously we’re not all blood related to him lol, look at Heath ledgers Ned Kelly. True to the core of Ned, maybe a bit ponsy imo but still a good Ned Kelly, this Ned Kelly was a weird cross dressing bipolar psycho path. Not saying he couldn’t have been a psycho in real life but he definitely didn’t wear dresses, as an Aussie it was insulting to watch them dismantle a hero down to a lunatic in a dress, that’s just my opinion. And I’m in no way shape or form blaming the actor he’s terrific and did what they asked of him. It’s more the story I disliked and again the fact they could have had a born and bred Aussie play the role. Regardless though a don’t think an Aussie that respected Ned and what he did would have played this role. Only my opinion so don’t get upset at me pls.
@@NoXone95 This movie isn't an accurate representation of what actually happened, and who Ned Kelly was. George is apparent about that. It's an interpretation of Ned and his story. He's explained in an interview before about how he wears dresses & lace; something along the lines of Ned Kelly representing what it is to be masculine, but what if being masculine entailed wearing dresses? It's an badass interpretation of what Ned Kelly could have been - simple as that. But agree to disagree I guess
@@shalesely you guess right cos a bloke wearing dresses especially Ned Kelly isn't a badass interpretation. That's blasphemy.