Suicide Squad Kill The Justice failure cost Warner Bros $200 million in revenue
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024
- PATREON: / yongyea
TWITTER: / yongyea
INSTAGRAM: / yong_yea
TIKTOK: / yongyea
SOURCES
1: www.metacritic...
2: opencritic.com...
3: store.steampow...
4: www.ign.com/ar...
5: www.forbes.com...
6: / 1788869122865971355
7: insider-gaming...
8: www.metacritic...
9: / 1787837762588008903
10: steamcharts.co...
11: steamcharts.co...
12: www-forbes-com...
13: www-forbes-com...
14: www.forbes.com...
15: www.forbes.com...
16: insider-gaming...
TOP PATRONS
[BIG BOSS]
Devon B
[BOSS]
Charlie Galvin
Gerardo Andrade
Michael Redmond
[LEGENDARY]
azalea
Live service fails while AAA single player game succeeds.
Warner Bros: "So we need to make more live services."
PATREON: www.patreon.com/yongyea
TWITTER: twitter.com/yongyea
INSTAGRAM: instagram.com/yong_yea
TIKTOK: www.tiktok.com/@yongyea
TOP PATRONS
[BIG BOSS]
- Devon B
[BOSS]
- Charlie Galvin
- Gerardo Andrade
- Michael Redmond
[LEGENDARY]
- azalea
Hopefully this type of flop makes them course correct. At the end of the day... Hogwarts Legacy(single player) succeeded and Suicide Squad(GaaS) flopped. These exec's only know one language... money.
You are a fraud lying to viewers about trash unfinished games
All we asked for was a Superman game in the ArkhamVerse. How is it this difficult? The Superman simulator made by Unreal Engine 5 that went viral a few years ago proves it is possible
Damn you Rocksteady
This is all good news imo
Yong is a fraud who lied to his audience he held back all gameplay issues with cyberpunk so everyone could go buy it
Fraud fraud fraud you fake fraud
No Warner Bros cost themselves 200 millions. No one asked for this game. And it was low effort.
It isn't just we didn't ask for this, literal thousands of people said that they didn't want it
If only it was low effort, worse thing about it is that this was the best they could do. The right mindset and talent is long gone.
Facts.
SBI and DEI are to be blamed
Bro literally said rocksteady wanted to make it the way it was made lol
I blame both companies, rocksteady for the game direction and WB for the monetization
They'll blame the loss on Rocksteady. At the end of this year Rocksteady will be closed. They'll buy a new studio, and commission them to make a live service game. Rinse and repeat the cycle of corporate shittiness.
CEO’s gotta get that sweet new yacht
Suicide Squad kill the rocksteady
I’m glad the founders and the smart ones at rocksteady peace out when they saw the writing on the wall I wish them well on their new studio hundred star
Yes pls close rocksteady. The original devs for arkham games has left. There will be no more good arkham games from these devs in the studio. Think about it......There's a team in the studio who somehow think Harley quinn, a mentally ill villain deserve to take batman spot as a hero.
@@jigglypuff5480 She's more an anti hero depending on the continuity but I get what you're saying.
The fact that WB lost all that money and won't learn anything is the real failure
Same is happening to the subsidiary the movie business and it’s all happening because the movie business is over because there’s a few months ago that Warner Bros. discovery is floating with bankruptcy and there was one point they were going to merge with Paramount
welcome to modern capitalism, where idiotic shareholders put moron execs in charge.
“Let’s all laugh at an industry that never learns anything, tee hee hee.”
I heard this is Rocksteady idea not WB idea but WB should just vetoed the idea in first place tho
The thing about executives is that they're all gambling addicts. The only difference is that they'll never risk losing their house, just their employee's house.
"Well.... Time to fire a bunch of developers and close a studio or two! That reminds me, I got to give myself a bigger bonus this year!" - WB Executive right now.
"It wasn't my fault, it's your fault!"
Honestly, whoever at Rocksteady did the writing for this game needs to be fired. Unfortunately someone undeserving will probably be caught in the crossfire, if not the entire studio. Either way, they were on their way out as a studio anyway, so the consumers lose nothing. I'll wager a games studio is only good for about three decent games nowadays, anyway.
@@cryptosporidiomrocksteady was making Batman: Arkham beyond but Wb forced them to make this
"i deserve a new yacht to recover from this setback. Time to fire some workers."
I do like to imagine they wipe the sweat off their brow after making the "difficult" decision to fire a bunch of employees and treat themselves to some R&R with a self issued bonus.
Oh I get it, it's called Suicide Squad because it killed itself.
Great comment lol
nice one
It killed the franchise, the Arkhamverse, and Rocksteady
@@teddyholiday8038 Arkhamverse died in Knightfall protocol. This BS isn't cannon.
@@ItsShaggy3 nah you’re literally wrong
They lost 200 million dollars and are still gonna invest in more live services. 😂
yeah I mean disney is making marvel's games single player after the avengers flop.
The sleeper agent gamers in China are going to carry those live service profits
They can afford to fail a lot, but once they hit the jackpot like fortnite/ apex, they'll have their cash cow for yrs. That's what they think. Whales are to be blamed
They are trying to replicate mihoyo's success with their Genshin and Honkai Star Rail (and ZZZ) WITHOUT putting in the effort and resources. The problem with corporations like WB is that they are a publicly traded company and they are legally contracted to make profit for their shareholders. Mihoyo on the other hand is a privately owned company, they are basically an indie game devs who happens to makes billions 😄
@@RoachChaddjr the sleeper agents won't touch it unless it's a waifu gacha game, which we know they won't make.
They should have made another Batman game but nooooo. Idiot Executives think LIVE SERVICE is what everyone wants
Ngl if they copy-pasted another Arkham installment with a few extra bells and whistles, it would have done EXPONENTIALLY better than what they tried.
The bar is so low that all they have to do is churn out samey slop, and they can't even do that.
A batman beyond game in Arkhan style would be a sucess
Another batman game you say? Meta Quest 3 exclusive it is!
Live service is never what anyone wanted, it's what makes the most money
Another Batman game? Why not a Superman game?
Hogwarts Legacy - a Single Player game experience - Massive hit, made huge numbers.
Suicide Squad killed the justice league - a live service crapshit - Massive Flop, loss huge numbers.
The ball is in your court WB. Listen to the community. What we want.
"LOL, MOOORE LIVE SERVICES"-WB
“Crapshit” lol.
That would require actual thinking instead of looking at graphs. So low chance . Probably will kill of Rocksteady then go all in on another cheap a** LS game made by SweatBaby and the like
“…so a VR Arkham but an exclusive to Meta Quest 3?” - Warner Bros
"Clearly the problem is Hogwarts Legacy set an unreasonably high bar! We should have more live service games to prevent such a massive sales spike from throwing off the numbers again!"
“Steam numbers don’t matter! It sold millions on console! MILLIONS!”
I was told this on Reddit, numerous times
bots? lol
It's like 2016 all over again when the Suicide Squad movie came out, people arguing weather this was good or bad and it failed due to many reasons one being it copying more successful games
Maybe some brainwashed People or bots
Just because it sells millions does not mean it sold enough to earn the millions they spent back. Plus if the player count is anything to go by, chances are it’s just the sub 200 players coping over the fact that their smugness and pedantic attitudes didn’t win out.
Ok. And spider-man 2 sold millions. And guess what. They also lost millions. The difference between the 2, is suicide squad has to pay money, to keep the game alive.
I’ve never seen companies double, triple and quadruple down on such failed ideas in my life. It’s baffling
Square Enix is still trying to do that with NFTs and Web 3 despite NFTs being deader than dead.
Tarkov who Sixtupled down on a huge scam to their players
@senshi_dev_art - yeah, convincing people that it was, indeed, time to Escape from Tarkov.
I don’t want to kill the Justice League.
Only the superman
same, my friend
same
Based
I want. Bloody and gory. :-)
Kill the Justice League would've been better if you were one of the injustice universes. Have us fight a version that's legitimately evil and can see us team up with our actual justice league.
Bonus points, have an alt-lex luthor become the commander of the suicide squad mid-way through, scheming against both the injustice league AND prime continuity luthor simultaneously.
Have the joker show up just to laugh at Kal-el, saying something like "Wait, *I* told you to kill Lois Lane, and you *LISTENED?!* Hua..hua! And they say comedy doesn't write itself! HUAHAHAHAHA!"
Why fear for Rocksteady's future? Most of the talent that made the Arkham games jumped ship years ago. This company is only Rocksteady in name now.
WB’s response to this “let’s double down on live service”
And embrace the wokeness
Sink Cost Fallacy is a bitch
Probably kill Rocksteady for failing and making one but ,"yes , lets try again!" (said by morron in a suit, probably)
@@kevingame3198oh no look out!! the wokes are gonna come steal your balls!!!!!! 😱😱
For fucks sake kevin, it's not about the wokeness!
Whatever happens, I hope that Warner loses the (frankly stupid) copyright they have on the "Nemesis System" game mechanic (who the f can copyright game mechanics? Its like Nintendo being able to copyright the concept of a 'jump button'') so that we can get more games that use that mechanic as a roleplaying/storytelling device.
Patents are a frequent thing in the industry sadly. Namco had one that prevented companies from having loading screen minigames and Nintendo did patent a very clever sanity system that was in eternal darkness (specifically what the sanity effects did. It was a lot more interesting than sanity effects you get in other games such as amnesia) Unfortunately, even though both of these have expired you don't see those mechanics returning in modern games and I imagine the same would apply here.
I couldn't tell you why. My guess is that it just doesn't cross developers mind since they've had to go so long without being able to do it.
Its a patent, and it lasts 10 years. That should be nearly done now.
Tbh I'm divided on this. On one side it's bad, not because they patented it, but because they didn't do anything with it after patenting it.
On good side, if they didn't patent it, ubisoft would have used it in every copy paste game of theirs and we'd all be sick and bored of nemesis system by now.
@@A1stardanare you serious? You think Ubisoft are gonna actually put another mechanic in their games? That involves work dude, something Ubisoft is allergic to.
Who thought that players wanted an incomplete, self righteous, disrespectful game?
Sweet Baby Inc?
These days I’m just laughing at all the people who told me to cope over that. Bet you $20 and a Lolipop those same people aren’t playing the game anymore.
@@SourBogBubble I was going to say the terminally online Twiter/X freaks but that works too.
@@SourBogBubbleWhales and bootlickers?
@@skaynne54 these types are typically Nike lickers
Warner bros: "Why don't they like it?! we spent 200 million dollars on it!"
I'll guarantee this conversation is happening at WB HQ:
"WHY WON'T YOU LEARN YOUR LESSON!?"
"Because learning lessons is for children. And we're growed ups."
That would make children smarter then the higher ups in WB. Hmm , it does make sence. ("Our live service game flopped and cost us 200 mil $ ! Lets make another one!")
Unfortunately, grown-ups will also develop their ego in the process.
Warner Bros ain’t working with Rocksteady no more on future DC games lol Rocksteady really blew it, as if they didn’t learn from the failure of Avengerrs
Truly an OK Boomer moment lol
I think it is more about "How could this have failed? We had representation!" and "I think it is the very small minority of customers who didn't buy it that caused this. Only those 20 people or so can make us lose millions of sales".
And Warner Bros will now think
*"lesson learned, dont make big budget superhero games"* like the smoothbrains they are.
Dont blame the methodology they pushed into the game, just blame the basic concept. It's always just consumer data, nothing wrong with them.
I've wondered what the chances are that they attribute Hogwart's success to the Harry Potter IP solely rather than it being single player. Wouldn't surprise me.
This is the same smoothbrains who complained about old western TV show models being obsolete on streaming when Mando S1 came out... s2 and 3 are the worst seasons and guess which most closely stuck to the older model?
@CelticGuardian7 Absolutely. And its because these are selfish out of touch executives that don't ever blame themselves for being in the wrong.
Their business mindset prioritizes their survival within the company foremost, and anything that can be trimmed is fair game. Including developers who put their heart and souls into it, sad as it is.
It's a major issue with how different the videogame industry is from a lot of others. The cutthroat profitization way of living works in things like Steel or when going out entirely for yourself. But game companies require a certain level of human investment that doesnt come off as logical to these higher execs. You need people at the top that are understanding of the long term plan and risks associated with gaming.
That and the fact Microsoft put a $70+ billion hole in their pocket with nothing to show for it. Clown behaviour. They need to fall for this at this point I feel. But that'd also suck ass because then sony would be at the top which is almost EVEN WORSE. Remember 500 USDollars in 2005 and proprietary memory cards for the vita that literally accomplished NOTHING!?
Sorry for ranting at the end lol. But yeah a lot of big shit kinda stinks. But there's also a lot of incredible stuff to play out right now at least. Tsushima on pc baybeee
"Suicide Suicide: Killed by Live Service"
A perfect name.
You mean killed by sweet baby INC
@@kevingame3198 when will you culture vulture incel give this shit a break. It fail because it was a half ass live service game in a saturated market. You only get one gamergate your not gana get another. Touch some grass.
@GHOSTSTARSCREAM Not really, since most people lost interest in the game as soon as it being a live service came out. The term has a huge stigma attached to it.
@GHOSTSTARSCREAM The whole live service industry is bad, yes. Just look at what a live service game entails! Endless grinding for paltry rewards, by definition. Plenty of people have fun playing some live service games, sure, but that was even true of the endless movie tie-in shovelware we used to get back in the 2000s.
@TyrantWesker Only the terminally online cares about this bad live-service connotation. The vast majority of people don't give a f- They will play live-service if the game is good. In the case of SQ people didn't play it because it looks bad and plays bad.
Laughs in Helldivers 2.
Can we please stop saying this wasn't Rocksteady's fault? It took them almost a decade to make this garbage heap. Studio was mismanaged into the ground.
Nobody wants to kill Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, the Flash, etc.
I want. And i think many others too.
What‘s so special in one more game you play as Superman or Batman?
Why not try something different?
Btw., what you look what happens at the DCU, you could think even they want to kill them. ;-)
@@apri.lwetter
*Looks at Suicide Squad performance*
Yeah, sure, lots of people do.
Nobody can if you think about it. The plot was a flop.
Don't be ridiculous-- alot of people do. Unfortunately, most of them are in DC's fictional universes and the ones in our world probably don't play games.
I don't mind being able to take out the Justice League. I _DO_ mind if the ways that gets done are complete and utter asspulls, like in this game.
They were deffo pressured by industry trends regardless of who made the final call
But despite what the trends say, more live service games fail than they do succeed and the ones that manage it only do so because it's very much designed with the service in mind. Helldivers 2 is a good example.
The game needs more than just multiplayer and a functioning shop/battlepass to be sold as a live service game. Something that 90% of the industry doesnt seem to understand.
@@BlaizeTheDragon agreed
I heard a rumor that this game's getting shut down next year. I think they should shut it down now. It's only going down.
They'll probably scrap all future content long before that
Remember, Anthem had like 6-7 seasons planned. Yet everything past the first got killed off because nobody was playing
And they wanted me to pay $70 for something that will be taken away within a year.... wow....
@@bobtom1495 Sounds about right. Not gonna be surprised if this is true
Gotta squeeze all the money from the fools that bought this "Live Service" early.
@@Yarharsuperpirate Ah Anthem, that game. Sold so bad that it was being sold for a penny. Truly one of the games of all time.
PlayStation offered a 3 hour trial of the game and I couldn’t make it through a hour of it
Gamers warned Warner Brothers about making live service garbage. Now they're crying about huge losses 😂
As people in multiple comments pointed out , they will 100% blame it on Rocksteady , learn absolutely nothing and just keep trying again and again
What the hell did anyone expect from a game which dialogue sounded like a stream of James Gunn's tweets?
Suicide Squad killed by live service - awesome reply by YongYea. We want Single Player or it's DOA. 💪
That’s pretty much how much Warner Bros Pictures lost for the Flash. Now WB Games is dealing with the same kind of flop. What sucks is that this game could have been awesome. But it wasn’t and those delays were a serious red flag.
Suicide Squad (SS for short) have lots of potential. But WB just squanders it. The only good SS content was the 2021 movie and some of the animated movies.
I thoight Gotham Knights was the red flag?
@@rascoehunter3608 Frankly almost every piece of Batman material seems to fall victim to the same trap and winds up rooted in the 90s-style, Liefield-esque "pizza cutter" approach to storytelling: "all edge, no point".
Harley Quinn isn't necessarily a bad or uninteresting character. Most of the rest of the Suicide Squad... kind of have been (King Shark? Really?), but even that could be changed with some good writing. Wouldn't be the first time a superhero team is carried by one or two more fully realized characters.
There have already been some comics where she makes a pretty solid anti-hero they could have built on, too. She's usually paired up with Poison Ivy in those, but given how utterly played out both her and Poison Ivy are as villains I'm very much okay with the two of them spinning off to have their own struggling-but-ultimately-heroic Gotham adventures with a small supporting cast. None of the characters are anywhere near that state in the Arkham 'verse, but that's what character arcs are for.
Even if they had to "kill the justice league" plot in this game, imagine if the point of the game was Harley coming into her own as a trying-to-be-heroic figure, with Batman's (obviously temporary, as we all know) death seeing him pass the baton in some way. Maybe a moment of lucidity before he dies, maybe a pre-recorded message he left her after he realized what was going to happen, whatever.
Sure would have been a lot more interesting than what we got, at least.
@@PhysicsGamer True. Also DC has a problem of over milking their characters as well. Harely Quinn especially.
Suicide Squad Kill the Rocksteady. Founders of Rocksteady left in 2022 with a lot of veterans. Rocksteady is done for. Thanks WB execs for ruining an amazing game studio. I cannot believe it.
It’s so sad seeing our beloved studios just disappearing. Fuck these corporations
Why did they think players would be fine with killing the Justice League?
Are they stupid?
(Obligatory r/BatmanArkham reference)
Wasnt even that . They just made the game that did it in as disrespectful way as possible (to maximally provoke the fans) on top of obvious grindfests to make you pay cash
Officer Balls
I think they simply think their audience is stoopid and will consume everything they release. Same with so many other franchises these days (Star Wars, DC, Marvel, etc.). The people running these companies have nothing but contempt for the audience and history of the franchise, but assume the audience will show up no matter how they change the source material. It is mindboggling to me to see how badly so many entertainment companies are run these days.
@@shadowkhan422 it still infuriating me because they make joke about boomer magnum after they kill the Flash who saved these incompetent suicide squad TWICE btw not just one but twice and the 2nd one is the reason why Flash turned into Braniac minion ffs
@@BlurXIIIBWAHAHA 👹
I'm honestly tired of the Suicide Squad. This should've been a Justice League game!
WB hitting the Yamcha pose rn
God I love DragonBall.
😭
WB is probably gonna wolf fang fist rocksteady to death
They had the perfect opportunity. When the Squad is clearly outmatched, a certain Ghost in Gotham goes public again as Batman to save the world one last time. The game ends with Bruce actually sacrificing himself to stop Brainiac. There you go.
You still get the Squad, you get Batman, and you get an actual good way for Batman to go out. You could drop hints that Selina and Bruce are expecting a kid then spin up a Batman Beyond story. They could have done something so much better. But no.. the fat cats at the top had other ideas.
It was just a bad idea to involve the squad in general. They're supposed to be disposable and do dirty work. If the game needs to involve Brainiac it should've been a JL game.
Idea?
No, they had NOTHING. They just want money, not ideas. There's no idea in this game. Its all preexisting stuffs and the artists and programmers scuffled and sabotaged to make this game as bad as it is.
Those 9 years are solely on Warner Bros. to blame.
@@Korra228 And when it comes to Brainiac and the JL, we already had Injustice 2 so we didn't even need to involve Brainiac at all. Use a different villain in a game to "Kill the Justice League" like Vandal Savage or Rhas al Ghul and use the Justice League: Doom comic/film as inspiration.
@@EJ_Red I don't even like the idea of killing the JL. Why not make a game where you play as them and fight Doomsday or Darkseid? This entire game premise was just idiotic.
Congrats on putting more thought into the story than anyone involved in making it!👍
I don’t feel bad, they know the reputation these kinds of games have and they check all the boxes for the scummy money grabbing practices. And yet they still wanna do more live service 🙄
Its not like they have the brain power to be able to learn from mistakes I quess?
What an ending to the Arkham universe.
Disgusting treatment of a beloved game universe.
WB should have known this was gonna flop. Storyline that players weren't very fond of upon hearing it, live service no one asked for, repetitive looking gameplay, and to top it off the Sweet Baby Inc kiss of death. I don't feel sorry for them at all 😂
All corpetations sees is "how to nickle and dime people to potentially earn as much money as possible", yet they forget the FIRST AND MOST IMPORTANT RULE, *MAKE A GOOD PRODUCT THAT PEOPLE WILL WANT TO BUY.*
That studio must be sweating right now
200,000,000$ thrown in trash while some people can't even find food.
This feels like dejavu, its like we time traveled back to 2016
Time to be honest about these bloated budgets. It's fraud.
I've said for the longest time that huge budgets does not automatically mean the game is going to be good or more importantly (for the industry) successful. If anything, I'd argue the industry is spending too much money on development. It's getting proven time and time again that smaller budget games are doing far better because they're not as expensive for the consumer and the developers/publishers do not need to make as much back to turn a profit.
Of course, they'll never learn.
They other guy still don’t get it lol.
The bloated budgets are executives eating up all the budget to buy new houses
im glad they learn there lesson, this. THIS! is how we fight back, dont pre order. wait for the game and then decide if you buy
Hilarious that these giant companies still think that what we want is not important. At this point, big name games are just completely worse than indie games.
Music to my ears
They want all of the money for none of the effort and then act all surprised when their plan fails.
Live services games aren't for everyone. I'm a gamer and I love single player story games like Resident Evil where the main focus is the story, the adventure. I don't like these modern pay to win games. Also, the plot of this game sucked. People don't want to see the heroes losing to the bad guys. I knew this would fail the moment it was announced.
I'm surprised they didn't just cancel the game and call it a tax write-off like their movies.
The live service is a mere facet of the problem with Suicide Squad. The writing was absolutely abhorrent.
They could've been printing their own money with that Superman game
That's what happens when you make a game for an audience that doesn't exist
Sounds almost like Hollywood making movies for an audience that does not exist
@@jacobsoboleski5415 Almost? We all know it's exactly the same sorta people making these choices in every industry.
The microtransaction whales do exist, but not enough to sustain a game.
There was an audience for this game?
@@DaFro3713 There used to be when the early trailers came out many years ago. They all left when gameplay footage first came out.
Nothing good will come from this, weve seen this before. They will close studios to recover costs to appear uneffected to shareholders and fire a few figure heads that leave on crazy high severences. Sad.
But will people learn from mistakes...
People will, not WB though.
Imagine thinking WB are people. 😂
Maybe for the customers, not so much for fat cats running WB.
CEOs aren't real people.
nope.avi
Let's all laugh at the industry that never learns
... anything TEE HEE HEE
I'd rather laugh at you 2.
@@Rocketcow-dx1jd So... you think they'll learn from this disaster or...?
@@PhysicsGamer Of course not. And they will continue to fail upwards due to a near infinite revenue stream through merchandising and films.
"I don't know how executives have the positions and jobs that they do." - YongYea, May 2024
This quote sums up my thoughts perfectly. I don't get this industry: How often have executives to see other studios fail till they realize "Hey, it might be a bad idea to make another game/product like this"? Why do they keep trying? Why are they pushing so hard into anti-consumer territory? Why don't they learn about studios like Lariant? Why are executives still making millions over millions of dollars, even when failing to do whatever the heck they are supposed to to? And what the heck are they are doing anyway? What is their job in a daily 8 hour shift while studios are working on games/products?
Again: I simply don't get how this industry works. I would have been fired and after that be re-hired only to getting fired again, simply to show how much I fucked up at my job.
WB, Sony, Microsoft are the new We Commit Suicide Squad: Kill The Business.
im sure the right people will be held accountable for this.
/s
Corporations: "All these super successful studios I acquired keep failing to meet expectations. Are my expectations and terrible management to blame? No, it's the players that don't give me enough of their money"
They really should have gotten my input first, i'd have told them before they lost any money on it that it was gonna flop hard. I knew it from the first announcement and hearing it would be live service and SS and the first trailer just cemented my opinion.
All that money could've gone into a proper sequel to the arkhamverse in a single player narrative driven game
Layoffs in waiting across the board in WBgames. Jump ship devs Jump ship!
Good Riddance I was never gonna waste my time with an live service game total junk !
Live service is not the only reason people hated that game.
I can't imagine what the developers are feeling who get to keep their jobs but are being forced to work on WB's next live service. I don't know why anyone would want to stay after that... employee attrition is going to be sky high with that project. We saw the same issue in Arkane, many employees spoke out about having to work on a game they didn't want to work on.
I wonder how much of that 200 million was used to make the game?
Sure didn't help that the game shit all over and disrespected everyone's favorite heroes either.
Warner Bros say "it cost them $200 million in revenue". What they really mean is "we didn't get a big enough tax write off...."
His mouth says I am fine we are happy here, his eyes say there's a gun to the back of my head and they will shoot if we don't speak these words
A trash game. A grift. Failed cash grab
Well deserved 👏
Great video.
I knew before this game released it was going to be a flop and no where near as good as the Arkham Asylum games. I'm starting to see a trend, games that Sweet Baby Inc are involved in tend to suck, put bluntly.
I hope WB execs see this video and just give us what we want which is a superman game and batman beyond game
Long timer gamer here and I am fed up with the big publisher and triple A seen. I find myself just playing indie games.
Good, anyday a corporation loses millions is a good day.
I wouldn't be sad about Rocksteady being closed, the real talented developers already left, it's just an empty husk now.
Hogwarts Legacy, a Single-Player game, made infinitely more money than that Live-Service dumpster fire Suicide Squad & yet the head of WB Games still wants to focus more on LS & less on SP. WTF???🤬
This garbage game would've failed no matter what, live service or single player.
It wasnt JUST the live service.
It was crap written by fanfiction writers with agendas.
The terrible repetitive gameplay didn't help.
You're only half-right with your initial statement, Yong.
It should be "Suicide Squad: Killed by Live Service AND Sweet Baby Inc."
Because those were the two things that murdered that game.
This is music to my ears. 😅😅😅😂
Wow.
Who could’ve seen it coming.
I’m shocked.
Absolutely shooketh.
Like seriously this was so damn obvious I genuinely wonder what they were expecting. Question is whether they learn their lesson (probably not)
They won't learn
Maybe if WB wanted this game to support them, they should have made a good game.
People were talking about this when this game was just rumors noone wants a suicide squad game. Noone wanted a movie either. We still haven't gotten a superman game, flash, etc.
Or a justice league single player game
@@maofria1452 Nah team games are always garbage look at Avengers. Game devs need to focus on ONE main character and making them as amazing as possible. Just compare Spiderman PS4 to Avengers Spiderman and you have your answer.
@@WalrusWinking You can play as several Batfamily heroes in the Arkhan games, although only in certain sections of the game. It's possible to make a good game with a team of heroes, but it would probably be quite expensive. I believe that a game like this single player game with optional coop would be a great success. Imagine being able to play Spider Man and Miles Morales in co-op with a friend.
@@maofria1452 I can imagine but I don't have friends lmao
For reference, Marvel's spiderman cost 100mill.
Elden ring cost around 200mill PRE dlc.
This game losing 200mill is absolutely hilarious and arguably suspect.
I feel like 150 mill got "lost"
I can make it make sense, Yong. The Suits all look at how much money Fortnite makes and go "I want all of that. Make me that."
They don't care about their studio's zone of expertise, they just want all of the money, all of the time.
oh wow that's a good point...if you know enough about the people you're going to pitch to, it makes sense to optimize the pitch to make them happy.
it takes a village to sink a ship...though a dedicated executive could still do it on their own 🙂
The more they lose the better.
Can you explain why?
the more they lose more inocent employees getfired :((
@@ronburgundy3172 If you produce garbage you deserve to get fired.
@@apri.lwetter so that WB get bankrupt because you can't save it without these corrupt executives that runs the company destroying it from inside out
Now comes the part where we all throw our heads back and laugh, ready?
But but but Sweetbaby told us that injecting everything they wanted into the game would make us so much money
How could they have possibly been wrong???
In a better World this game would have been "Save the Justice-Leaque", where the bad guys had to save the good guys and the world.
Don’t worry they care more about ESG money than making good games
Instead of punishing the devs and workers in order to save money, why not fire executives instead?
Companies should be required to fire all management and executives before they can legally fire anyone in a non-management position.
And yet they're still going to push forward with their live service plans. They deserve any financial problems that come their way at this point. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to rehire Sweet Baby Inc for another project, that's how tone-deaf these execs are.
Goddamn. That's The Flash film-levels bad. I dont recall AND game flopping as hard as a huge Hollywood film.
WB better scrap their Live Service plans now. How tf can they continue that if just ONE flop lost them $200mil?
Sweet Baby Inc lost WB 200 million, and RockSteady are equally to blame. WB should immediately close the studio, and cut ties with SBI and never use a consultancy firm again when it comes to making games.
i never buy live service games, i did it once and then it closed and i could never play it again, taught me to only buy non-live service games.
Sorry to say but from what am hearing is actually Rocksteady’s fault the argument that Warner Brothers should of stopped them from making a live service game doesn’t show that Warner ruined the game. Rocksteady knew what they were doing and should be blamed for it, hopefully the studio stays up but if it doesn’t the founders of Rocksteady made their own studio due to the changes in Rocksteady management showing the damage was already done even back then.
I always knew when they announce it as live service it would fucking fail
Ah, yeah, let's double down live service and wokeness, even if they lost more money than the fund they saved.