If you pause at 1:55:40 on the right frame, you can see that the Canadian player was straddled, but left his out of bounds foot first in the process of loading his jump... meaning he was reestablished in bounds before he had left his feet for the catch. Genuinely requires a frame by frame review, so I don't blame either side for reaching the conclusions they did. Glad it ended on that point with the team that did win on the contested in-out getting the win.
wow. I watched the replay of this so many times and thought it was pretty clear cut that he was OB (due to the straddle)... but you're right, it's literally down to the frame by frame that he was actually in. His left foot is up for only 3 frames ahead of the right, but it's definitely off the ground before his right. Certainly can't blame anyone for the out call though - even the slowmo looks definitively out. Glad to see Canada win despite this and Hibbert's incredibly stupid near OB play.
I was disappointed, not in the call being wrong, but in the announcers not even picking up on this nuance. It was all about which foot was last on the ground when he jumped, but they just were stuck on "straddle means he's out".
@@howtodobydeven8845 well yeah - because they didn't see it. Even in the slowmo live it looked like jumped off both feet at the same time. There were only 3 frames of his right foot being down in slowmo - it wasn't easy to spot.
at 1:17:08 replay you can see that his foot was still on the ground when the disc was caught. I believe this foot is out of the endzone so it should be ruled Not In
4:22 1st half pull 1:01:25 2nd half pull (as of writing this comment. If portions of the video are removed, then the timestamps will be off. Video ends at 2:07:48)
If you pause at 1:55:40 on the right frame, you can see that the Canadian player was straddled, but left his out of bounds foot first in the process of loading his jump... meaning he was reestablished in bounds before he had left his feet for the catch. Genuinely requires a frame by frame review, so I don't blame either side for reaching the conclusions they did. Glad it ended on that point with the team that did win on the contested in-out getting the win.
wow. I watched the replay of this so many times and thought it was pretty clear cut that he was OB (due to the straddle)... but you're right, it's literally down to the frame by frame that he was actually in. His left foot is up for only 3 frames ahead of the right, but it's definitely off the ground before his right. Certainly can't blame anyone for the out call though - even the slowmo looks definitively out. Glad to see Canada win despite this and Hibbert's incredibly stupid near OB play.
I was disappointed, not in the call being wrong, but in the announcers not even picking up on this nuance. It was all about which foot was last on the ground when he jumped, but they just were stuck on "straddle means he's out".
@@howtodobydeven8845 well yeah - because they didn't see it. Even in the slowmo live it looked like jumped off both feet at the same time. There were only 3 frames of his right foot being down in slowmo - it wasn't easy to spot.
@@howtodobydeven8845but they were so confidently wrong about it.
That Aussie comentator is awsome!
at 1:17:08 replay you can see that his foot was still on the ground when the disc was caught. I believe this foot is out of the endzone so it should be ruled Not In
4:22 1st half pull
1:01:25 2nd half pull
(as of writing this comment. If portions of the video are removed, then the timestamps will be off. Video ends at 2:07:48)
6:46
10:05
13:51
16:09
28:21
30:53
33:15
36:32
42:19
46:10
48:25
This does not look like national level offense at the beginning here.
There has to be a misconduct foul when the mark is so far off you and you fake a throw into their arm just to call the foul and reset the stall count.
12:25
He would be at stall three there so don’t think that’s the total intent here. Also mark fouled him.
1:55:40 This foul is sooooo intentional