11:20 Athanasius says the same to refute the Arians, the Son is generate from the nature, but creation is from the will of God. He contemplate a distinction in will (which is an energy) and essence. But Aquinas affirm in the Summa that they are identical, making Athanasius argument against the Arians null and void.
Doesn't the will come from nature, as St. Maximus points out? I know the will is connected to energy, for I use the energy to manifest the will, but the will is _from_ nature, are there a distinction in His nature and essence as well?
The fact Ybarra and Dwong repeat the line we reject "through the Son" when Blachernae shows they simply don't read nor have any idea what they are talking about. That or they are liars. I prefer the former.
The main problem is that they don’t read the fathers of Blachernae. If they condemn through the Son, like they claim, why does st. Gregory of Cyprus use it and explain many things this way? They are just ignorants.
@JesusPerez-wd3tq not in one video but I will respond to the quotes and arguments he uses for each individual saint but I want to also highlight how the saints are compatible with orthodoxy rather than just making rebuttals so it's a bit of both
11:20 Athanasius says the same to refute the Arians, the Son is generate from the nature, but creation is from the will of God. He contemplate a distinction in will (which is an energy) and essence. But Aquinas affirm in the Summa that they are identical, making Athanasius argument against the Arians null and void.
@@Jerônimo_de_Estridão nah bro, it's only a virtual distinction! [Joking]
Good point
Doesn't the will come from nature, as St. Maximus points out? I know the will is connected to energy, for I use the energy to manifest the will, but the will is _from_ nature, are there a distinction in His nature and essence as well?
The fact Ybarra and Dwong repeat the line we reject "through the Son" when Blachernae shows they simply don't read nor have any idea what they are talking about. That or they are liars. I prefer the former.
The main problem is that they don’t read the fathers of Blachernae. If they condemn through the Son, like they claim, why does st. Gregory of Cyprus use it and explain many things this way?
They are just ignorants.
Thank you for making these videos brother 🙏
The Blachernae claim gets even funnier every time😂
Can I contact you on Discord or other platforms?
@@TheuncreatedLogos I am on Twitter [X] of you l would like to contact me
x.com/TheCathodox?t=_bMFUot7kP73DSGwXTVMIA&s=09
I love you❤
_Per Filium_ is a good formulation!
@pj_ytmt-123 I totally agree! And it is the only formula given in the ecumenical councils of the first millennium that goes beyond the Nicene Creed.
@@TheCathodoxwill you respond to his video on the greek fathers?
@JesusPerez-wd3tq not in one video but I will respond to the quotes and arguments he uses for each individual saint but I want to also highlight how the saints are compatible with orthodoxy rather than just making rebuttals so it's a bit of both