Yeah, it was pretty hard to breathe in the entire skyscraper, which is why they had it aerosolized. It's much more convenient to breathe in a building like that when it's made of tiny dust particles.
They are (supposed) to have measures in place to help prevent the dust, but I guess they didn't care or they didn't make a difference. For example, they could've done it when it was raining outside, or sprayed a bunch of water. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality is in charge of the regulations.
For those who dont know, this building was vacant for years and in disrepair. It was damaged by a hurricane years ago. It was too expensive to repair and no one was interested in doing so. Unless you're from down here you likely dont understand what hurricane damage can do to a building.
Heck for all we know the entire thing could be entirely asbestos. Probably the people who worked there could have been asbestos at the rate they’re breathing in there.
@@johnjacobjingleheimerschmi3857 asbestos abatement was taking place at the World Trade Center through the 1990s. It was really only present in the North Tower’s first 40 Floors. The inevitable ban was anticipated as early as 1970ish, so a new fiber was introduced and used in the rest of the North Tower’s (1 WTC’s) construction and the entirety of the South Tower’s (2 WTC’s) construction. 7 World Trade Center had virtually no asbestos in its structure.
@@shams_shimul to be honest I didn't notice it when it first happened, but looking at replays later on, I can see similarities with the exploding things on the windows before it fell down gracefully.
@@chiyolate Don't forget that they fell both at the same time and from up to down with out tilting, very suspicious. Don't forget Build 7 fell too for no reason what so ever in the same day.
This rolling dust occurs with every implosion. I'm surprised no one has yet figured out a way to at least somewhat contain it. Demolition of very small structures using only heavy equipment has a guy spraying water the entire time on the debris as its created.
Nobody forgot what "demolition" means, ya doof, that's just another (and in fact, more precise) way to describe it. The building was collapsed in on itself (i.e. *im*plosion) via a controlled *ex*plosion.
@@SlightyLessEvolved NOPE: "Implosion is the collapse of an object into itself from a pressure differential or gravitational force. Examples of implosion include a submarine being crushed by hydrostatic pressure and the collapse of a star under its own gravitational pressure." INTO itself, not ONTO the ground, which is _another type_ of "collapse". An "imploding" building would end up as a small clump, suspended in midair, about halfway off the ground in relation to its original height. There are 450,000 words in the English language... tend towards _nuance_ , not _unnecessary duplication_ . Implosions go _inward_ , _this_ collapse went _downward_ .
@@kentuckybowl-o-sticks Oh for pete's... the interior structure went down, and lack of supportive pressure caused the rest of the building to fall in *and* down. Is an explosion not an explosion if it only blows up laterally?
@@brandonbuchner1771 Only in a controlled demolition you have gravity fall speed. In any other case the resistance of the materials (steel, concrete) will slow down the fall.
no no...that makes you a conspiracy theorist. If that's where you went instead of the dozens or more controlled demolitions in the past 30 years, either you are a conspiracy theorist or you need therapy because you were very very impacted on that day.
Yup. That debris causes cancer in a long run. Somebody from the same day where the 9/11 attacks happened and this person survived the impact but died two decades later from cancer that was in the debris of the falling towers. Scary stuff but it's always avoidable if you care about your body.
It looked worse than it was. Also ... taking a building down brick by brick and implosions create the same amount of dust in the air throughout each process. It's just a matter of how long it takes. Found that to be interesting (courtesy the experts at CDI a while back).
@@horvathr95 Only thing is, they didn't tilt or fall randomly, and they both fell at the same time, let's not forget number 7 that fell for no reason at all.
Funny you say that. They were *going* to hit it with a Boeing 747 but I heard that at that the last second someone told them it would be a media disaster. So they hit it with a hurricane instead.
@SoundofSilence492 if and that is a huge if...and I am 100% sure the structure was cleared of any harmful items before demolition...IN FACT I KNOW IT WAS.. stop being a follower and learn how things are done...rather just assuming
Built for $40MM in 1981, sold for $14MM in 2007 . . . and that was when it was still intact. (It was a money pit, unable to compete with much less expensive low-rise office parks.) Estimated cost of repairs after Hurricane Laura (2020) was $130MM, and the insurance company was not about to pay ten times what the place was worth, so it sat there, boarded up, until now. The land is still in private hands; no word on what their plans are but it certainly won't be 26 stories of unaffordable office space.
'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." -Larry Silverstein
I almost stopped reading the comments and glad I kept going because reading this literally made me LOL in a way most splendid. You nailed that s*** word-for-word - I didn't double-check but I know you did just the same.
@@adamhaut6859Jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams. This has been proven many, many times. And if it did, if I were you I’d cancel that next flight post haste lol and Building 7 didn’t take a hit from a plane 🙃
@@Los150 you’re correct, but I suppose a jet airliner flying at around 500mph might severely weaken a steel structure 🤔. That severely weakened structure attempting to support the entire load of the building above the impact zone might have had something to do with the top portion of both towers coming down on the rest of the tower below….
No, you didn't. WTC collapse was organic; it comes down like pancakes with both towers. In fact, it came down just like the Miami condo did a few years back. This is controlled demolition; it starts on one side and progressively moves on a gradient to the other. Pancake=organic Gradient=controlled🧠
To us residents of lake Charles this building was our primary landmark. It was the tallest building in our city. To see it with broken windows boarded up and not in use was an eyesore on the locals. I'm glad it's gone too. Now we can be recognized by other things besides this tower. It was a lot of money spent on a lot of wasted potential. An all glass building in one of the worst spots for hurricanes in southwest Louisiana was a bad idea. So we are happy we can move on and make one step towards a better and more stable infrastructure in Lake Charles ❤️ hopefully this answers your question.
It was unsafe for use. The only other option was to leave it there and watch daily runs at stealing of the copper pipe and wire. Probably homeless people would have been a problem keeping them out nightly.
That is why the residents in the video are cheering. We are proud to have finally fixed one of the many problems with our city. This building was our primary landmark for several years and seeing it in disrepair was always a depressing sight. An all glass building in the middle of hurricane central Louisiana was a bad idea from the start. So as residents we look forward to whatever comes next for our community. Now we finally can focus on other things and make new landmarks for ourselves. It is a necessary step towards a better infrastructure for our city. I hope this answers your questions and concerns❤
A Category 4 hurricane is quite strong. On the other hand, maybe they shouldn't build such tall and vulnerable buildings so close to a hurricane-prone coastline.
I'm going to miss that building it was an iconic building, we always seen it, every year we went for vacation, it always had missing windows. Very sad.
It was severely damaged in 2020 by a Cat 4 hurricane. It had sat vacant and damaged for four years. The city government finally said it either needed to be fixed or demolished. I guess the owners figured it was cheaper to bring it down than to fix it.
@@lionesse110 what? That's dumb. The building was an expensive piece of work that had been hit with multiple hurricanes. It's not a fraud it's common sense. An all glass building in the middle of a hotspot for hurricanes was a dumb idea and it didn't work. So they scrapped it. It's not some deep state ploy. All of us residents agreed it needed to be done. Conspiracies be wilding bro.💀💯
For nearly 23 years now that's been suggested/suspected. To see Building 7 collapsing in on itself many hours later---to this day, it still strikes me as very odd. To my knowledge why it took so long to fall ---and so neatly---has never been explained to the public's satisfaction. It did appear to be the result of a controlled demolition when compared with this one in the video and with numerous other implosions found online. I certainly understand the reason for suspicions continuing to float around out there.
@@InterviewsWithTheAncients it doesn’t take rocket science to figure out what ACTUALLY happened to 7 WTC that day. Can’t believe people still perpetuated lies all of these years later.
@@InterviewsWithTheAncients Bingo. 7WTC (much taller than this) fell after it was hit by another building and consumed by an uncontrolled inferno. No booms. The high explosives used in an actual controlled demolition can be heard for miles. I've seen five of them and I always think "Anyone who thinks this is what happened to 7WTC is braindead".
The tower was significantly damaged in 2020 by Category 4 Hurricane Laura. The building lost the majority of its windows, and the side of the building facing south was destroyed. As of 2023, the building remained vacant and the city had given the new owners a deadline of November 2024 to either repair or demolish the structure.
How original. Also, this is not an implosion, it's a controlled demolition explosion, yes even the "journalists" that posted this doesn't know what the word means
I do not want to be breathing that!
Yeah, it was pretty hard to breathe in the entire skyscraper, which is why they had it aerosolized. It's much more convenient to breathe in a building like that when it's made of tiny dust particles.
They are (supposed) to have measures in place to help prevent the dust, but I guess they didn't care or they didn't make a difference. For example, they could've done it when it was raining outside, or sprayed a bunch of water. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality is in charge of the regulations.
@@adamk.7177 that's genius
Kind of looked like the 9 / 11 buildings going down.
Literally asbestos
For those who dont know, this building was vacant for years and in disrepair. It was damaged by a hurricane years ago. It was too expensive to repair and no one was interested in doing so. Unless you're from down here you likely dont understand what hurricane damage can do to a building.
obviously the people who built it were not from down here then
Thank you, Thunder, for making the most intelligent post on this page.
You’re kidding right? We can see damage that hurricanes do to buildings because of video, tv & the internet
And if you are not from up here, you likely don't understand what tornado damage can do to a building.
It is possible that years of letting water seep into the building through the broken windows did more damage than the actual hurricane did.
This building was built in 1983, and the EPA banned asbestos in 1990
That definitely meant that asbestos was probably all throughout that whole structure.
It was built with asbestos😮
Kinda like WTC 1, WTC 2 and Building 7. ;-|
Heck for all we know the entire thing could be entirely asbestos. Probably the people who worked there could have been asbestos at the rate they’re breathing in there.
@@johnjacobjingleheimerschmi3857 asbestos abatement was taking place at the World Trade Center through the 1990s. It was really only present in the North Tower’s first 40 Floors. The inevitable ban was anticipated as early as 1970ish, so a new fiber was introduced and used in the rest of the North Tower’s (1 WTC’s) construction and the entirety of the South Tower’s (2 WTC’s) construction. 7 World Trade Center had virtually no asbestos in its structure.
And there goes Lake Charles' entire skyline lol
The old Calcasieu Marine building.
That was the only thing in lake Charles at least they got crawdads and alligators I guess😅
You're naughty!
😂😂
Lol😅
I've seen something like this before
When? Around the start of the century?
@@shams_shimul to be honest I didn't notice it when it first happened, but looking at replays later on, I can see similarities with the exploding things on the windows before it fell down gracefully.
@@chiyolate
Don't forget that they fell both at the same time and from up to down with out tilting, very suspicious.
Don't forget Build 7 fell too for no reason what so ever in the same day.
@@zondazerda2230
Not a lot of people realise, on that same day, same location, 7 buildings in total came down.
why are there explosions at the bottom of the tower!!!! the planes hit them at the top!!!
Who forgot to close the car windows?..😂
Whoopsie!
No brainsies
Its controlled demolition, i had to read the title of the video again, no one was living in it for 4yrs, so the city had to take it down
@@TsarOfRuss he didnt mean it like that... he meant it as in all the dust going into the car from the window being demolished, for your sake.
Breathing all that toxic dust? Yikes
Yikes is so 2018
This rolling dust occurs with every implosion. I'm surprised no one has yet figured out a way to at least somewhat contain it. Demolition of very small structures using only heavy equipment has a guy spraying water the entire time on the debris as its created.
Imagine breathing in Gaza or Ukraine!
Look at it as an opportunity to practice your running skills.
@@mikeprice4103you sound like a dumb highschool blond😂
Controlled demolition
Get it. Look similar 😢
Duh
@@mangersavoir4213woosh
Brilliant deduction there, Ace..
@@ldawg7117 he was implying 911 Einstein
Never seen a hurricane destroy building like that
It was a demolition of an already destroyed building
Ball lightning
That was my first thought until I realized what they were doing. 😂
Hurricanes can’t melt steel beams!!!!!
you don't go out much do you?
are we so braindead we dont remember the word "demolition"?
Yep... as I said above:
Not "imploded", _demolished_ with _EXplosions_ .
Or Controlled....
Nobody forgot what "demolition" means, ya doof, that's just another (and in fact, more precise) way to describe it. The building was collapsed in on itself (i.e. *im*plosion) via a controlled *ex*plosion.
@@SlightyLessEvolved NOPE:
"Implosion is the collapse of an object into itself from a pressure differential or gravitational force. Examples of implosion include a submarine being crushed by hydrostatic pressure and the collapse of a star under its own gravitational pressure."
INTO itself, not ONTO the ground, which is _another type_ of "collapse". An "imploding" building would end up as a small clump, suspended in midair, about halfway off the ground in relation to its original height.
There are 450,000 words in the English language... tend towards _nuance_ , not _unnecessary duplication_ .
Implosions go _inward_ , _this_ collapse went _downward_ .
@@kentuckybowl-o-sticks Oh for pete's... the interior structure went down, and lack of supportive pressure caused the rest of the building to fall in *and* down. Is an explosion not an explosion if it only blows up laterally?
Almost like twins...
Exactly like actually
Yes Sir , quite the observation
That's correct...as gravity has not changed since 2001, the fall speed remains the same.
@@brandonbuchner1771 Only in a controlled demolition you have gravity fall speed. In any other case the resistance of the materials (steel, concrete) will slow down the fall.
💨🛫
Not to be a conspiracy theorist but….looks like watching the news again on 9/11/2001
no no...that makes you a conspiracy theorist. If that's where you went instead of the dozens or more controlled demolitions in the past 30 years, either you are a conspiracy theorist or you need therapy because you were very very impacted on that day.
@@brandonbuchner1771 It's not crazy to ask questions or speculate
@@s3v3n3Just beacuse you have a opinion it doesn't it's true. Get real boy
@@brandonbuchner1771 found the fed
@@s3v3n3 That's what's called a programmed response. Take no offense. They literally can't think past their programming. It makes them angry.
It's almost like a work of art the way they orchestrate how the building is going to fall...
9/11 too
Buildiing 7-2.0
All three towers were controlled demo
@@frederickmuhlbauer9477Lol no
@@lennarthagen8730 not very bright are we lol
@@frederickmuhlbauer9477 I try
@@frederickmuhlbauer9477definitely a resemblance. The first thing I thought. Buildings don’t naturally collapse into their own foot print
That was a professional demolition.
Look familiar huh
Look familiar?
Yes yes it do lol
7
Yep
Tf do you mean
@@Chicken_does_nothing September 11th!
Asbestos cloud! Coming right for ya.
Lawyers mouths waterin
There was no asbestos in that building...idiot
That building is too new to have asbestos.
@@luchagain3424 You built it?
@R4NDLL it was built in 1981, asbestos was banned in the 70s. Also even prior to that, not all buildings had asbestos.
That wasn't an implosion, it was controlled explosive demolition.
Bro, Implosion is used in demolitions like this lol
@@MAkAVeLlIiii That is not an implosion. Bro. That is a staged or stepped explosive demolition.
Half that dust is now in peoples lungs.
They chose to spectate... that's on them.
99.99999 % of that dust is on the ground.
Yup. That debris causes cancer in a long run. Somebody from the same day where the 9/11 attacks happened and this person survived the impact but died two decades later from cancer that was in the debris of the falling towers. Scary stuff but it's always avoidable if you care about your body.
It looked worse than it was. Also ... taking a building down brick by brick and implosions create the same amount of dust in the air throughout each process. It's just a matter of how long it takes. Found that to be interesting (courtesy the experts at CDI a while back).
This is why I watched it from New Zealand with an iPad 😂
Hmmmm, jet fuel ??
Hmmm look like some other buildings that fell
7
😂
Yep, looks like gravity works the same way in the state of New York as well
Remember 9.11
@@horvathr95 Only thing is, they didn't tilt or fall randomly, and they both fell at the same time, let's not forget number 7 that fell for no reason at all.
well that did not age well for having a building collapse in the month of September....
9/7
Well life does move on. That was 23 years ago.
Is your head full of mud? It was just imploded. Nothing about it has aged yet. You are using that expression completely wrong.
@@bobwoods1302and our country has never been the same. Only idiots would recommend forgetting about it
Funny you say that. They were *going* to hit it with a Boeing 747 but I heard that at that the last second someone told them it would be a media disaster. So they hit it with a hurricane instead.
That sure looked familiar.
Looks familiar 🤨
went down like the world trade center…
Yup!
the only real similarity is that they both fell
Except it didn't 😂😂😂
@@mick65291 stay slow my bwuh 💪
Same thing happened during 9/11 controlled explosions.
My thoughts exactly.
WTC 7...
... Building 7
9/11
Actually all three towers were control demolished The planes could never take them down alone
@@frederickmuhlbauer9477 Actually, so was Francis Scott Key Bridge [Soundless chemical demolition agents (SCDAs)].
@@frederickmuhlbauer9477source
@@frederickmuhlbauer9477 Only idiots can't (i.e., refuse to) see the differences.
no airplane?
Oh come on. That building was not blown up. It was hit by a airplane;.
❤❤❤ 😂
huriplane))))
the experts are amazing
Looked just like the twin towers and building 7... imagine that. And shown to us 3 days before 9-11. Touche!
They must’ve invested at least $2.3 trillion for that demolition!
Na this wasn't NASA
hahaha..bingo!
Looks like September 11
Almost like building 7 wtc
Years later mesothelioma strikes many who were downwind in the dust cloud...
THIS!
From what?
@@davidbryant3532 asbestos
@@davidbryant3532Asbestos, more than likely. It was legally used in building materials when the structure was erected.
@SoundofSilence492 if and that is a huge if...and I am 100% sure the structure was cleared of any harmful items before demolition...IN FACT I KNOW IT WAS.. stop being a follower and learn how things are done...rather just assuming
Looks like 911
Yea... Except there wasn't a freaking plane involved.
Idiot.
Just like building 7
And towers 1 and 2
No Building 7 fell wayyy more simmetrically than this
@@werner9643 you got me there. 23 years. Will they ever wake up?
@@TheNorthEnd7123 years woke? Get some well needed sleep!!
weird that this comes into my feed the day before 9/11
"What's this Building 7? Don't let the Feds find out about that one"
Building #8
3 trillion dollars later
Looks like a replay of two buildings in NY on a certain day in 2001 that the anniversary of was remembered only yesterday.
Looks familiar
Brings back memories of September 11th controlled demolitions
Built for $40MM in 1981, sold for $14MM in 2007 . . . and that was when it was still intact. (It was a money pit, unable to compete with much less expensive low-rise office parks.)
Estimated cost of repairs after Hurricane Laura (2020) was $130MM, and the insurance company was not about to pay ten times what the place was worth, so it sat there, boarded up, until now. The land is still in private hands; no word on what their plans are but it certainly won't be 26 stories of unaffordable office space.
'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." -Larry Silverstein
That's right. I saw the film of him saying those very words. So, when did "they" plant the explosives? Cause that takes months to do.
I almost stopped reading the comments and glad I kept going because reading this literally made me LOL in a way most splendid. You nailed that s*** word-for-word - I didn't double-check but I know you did just the same.
@@Dani92670 As the kiddies like to say, "just tryin' to keep it real!" HA.
Yes, the documentary LOOSE CHANGE showed him saying exactly that!
Looks like another building that collapsed into its own footprint.
One that was on fire for 2 hours and not impacted by any flying objects?
@@adamhaut6859Jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams. This has been proven many, many times. And if it did, if I were you I’d cancel that next flight post haste lol
and Building 7 didn’t take a hit from a plane 🙃
@@adamhaut6859 yep
Came here for this comment
@@Los150 you’re correct, but I suppose a jet airliner flying at around 500mph might severely weaken a steel structure 🤔. That severely weakened structure attempting to support the entire load of the building above the impact zone might have had something to do with the top portion of both towers coming down on the rest of the tower below….
Looks familiar, I mean the way it came down 🤔
Yep... "definitely" what happens when you spread a bunch of jet fuel around and light it.
Looked exactly like the twin towers implosion
I saw 2 buildings fall like this before
3 actually #7
No, you didn't. WTC collapse was organic; it comes down like pancakes with both towers. In fact, it came down just like the Miami condo did a few years back. This is controlled demolition; it starts on one side and progressively moves on a gradient to the other.
Pancake=organic
Gradient=controlled🧠
My immediate thoughts, too!!!
Only people with room-temperature IQs don't understand the difference between a progressive collapse and a controlled demolition.
Me too.....
Wow, that reminds me of building 7. 🙃
prob the biggest event in Lake Charles in decades 💀
The twin towers fell just like that on 9/11
I thought the same as you 😢
Who would have thought that gravity works in one way 🤦♂🤦♂
@@horvathr95 Who would've thought my comment would go over your head 😂
Kinda cool but kinda sad at the same time.
Building 7?
Reminds me of the twin towers,NY, 9/11
Why people are happy and cheering?
Bc its been sitting there ruined for years
To us residents of lake Charles this building was our primary landmark. It was the tallest building in our city. To see it with broken windows boarded up and not in use was an eyesore on the locals. I'm glad it's gone too. Now we can be recognized by other things besides this tower. It was a lot of money spent on a lot of wasted potential. An all glass building in one of the worst spots for hurricanes in southwest Louisiana was a bad idea. So we are happy we can move on and make one step towards a better and more stable infrastructure in Lake Charles ❤️ hopefully this answers your question.
@@AlternateReality52drive by all the time going to Texas. Happy it's gone and happy they are finally doing a new bridge there to
Because kabooms are cool.
Cause it was Cool!!!!!
Fell like building 7.
Imagine focusing on bs conspiracies.
Must be a kamala supporter
Bad taste
@@KY502ShinyHunter imagine walking around with your eyes closed your whole life.
@@muleface1066 Yeah well, it did fall like building 7.
Look familiar? Just saying
Exactly 💯😢😢
@@chordsofgratitude2073 wtc7
I sincerely hope you’re not referring to 9/11.
1,000000000%
you're crazy
Never forget #7
I just posted my comment without having seen yours first. Love your comment!!! Your screen name gives me deja vu from years ago, as well. 🤔
Those demolition folks really know what they’re doing.
Building 7?? Is that you???
reincarnation?
It was NOT imploded; it was destroyed using explosions.
You expect "journalists" to know how to use words correctly!?
Wrong lol. Implosion just means it’s directed inward on itself.
@@autofocus4556 Did everything go _inward_ ? NOPE.
@@autofocus4556 The level of stupidity man I just can't. It's so rampant these days you'd think these guys do not live outside of video games.
@@kentuckybowl-o-sticks yes, the majority of the building went inward. Just like every controlled demolition. 🤡
This looks familiar 😅
No idea that hurricane damage will cause a tall building being abandoned! What a waste of resource!
It was unsafe for use. The only other option was to leave it there and watch daily runs at stealing of the copper pipe and wire. Probably homeless people would have been a problem keeping them out nightly.
That is why the residents in the video are cheering. We are proud to have finally fixed one of the many problems with our city. This building was our primary landmark for several years and seeing it in disrepair was always a depressing sight. An all glass building in the middle of hurricane central Louisiana was a bad idea from the start. So as residents we look forward to whatever comes next for our community. Now we finally can focus on other things and make new landmarks for ourselves. It is a necessary step towards a better infrastructure for our city. I hope this answers your questions and concerns❤
A Category 4 hurricane is quite strong.
On the other hand, maybe they shouldn't build such tall and vulnerable buildings so close to a hurricane-prone coastline.
@@AlternateReality52What kind of landmark was it supposed to be?
BLACK MOLD
Comments get censored or deleted here because people can't handle the truth 🤣🤣
Very sad to see it go. I always considered it a very beautiful addition to our city landscape.
Louisiana skyscraper demolished 4 years after Hurricane Laura left it in tatters
That looked a lot like building 7 in NY 2001. Just sayin.
They couldn't have waited until Wednesday?
That's wild
They got the insurance contract early lol
@DavidRodriguez-er4rqm
My man you know it ... That was a large pay out ..
That comment is not nearly as clever as you think it was.
Not funny
Larry Silverstein approves this message
Like 9/11/2001
It was an inside job
Guess kamala supporters cant read the title
@JohnSmith-xu7ev, I'm pretty sure that conspiracy theorists are right-wingers
Never Forget.
I'm going to miss that building it was an iconic building, we always seen it, every year we went for vacation, it always had missing windows.
Very sad.
that didn't age well
@CaptainDark2009 it was just posted 😂
If I had the money that thing would have been turned into a big gravity mechanical battery..
Time to move on, isn't it?😊
@@B1FFCO it still technically aged
Looks like the world trade center buildings
Why was it destroyed?
Hurricane damaged building. Likely from Katrina. They took it down with explosives. Probly going to develop the land. Condos or houses.
It was severely damaged in 2020 by a Cat 4 hurricane. It had sat vacant and damaged for four years.
The city government finally said it either needed to be fixed or demolished. I guess the owners figured it was cheaper to bring it down than to fix it.
Rich friends cashing out through insurance
You buy a property too just take a no interest loan and you be all set. That’s what they do they use debt to become rich.
@@lionesse110 what? That's dumb. The building was an expensive piece of work that had been hit with multiple hurricanes. It's not a fraud it's common sense. An all glass building in the middle of a hotspot for hurricanes was a dumb idea and it didn't work. So they scrapped it. It's not some deep state ploy. All of us residents agreed it needed to be done. Conspiracies be wilding bro.💀💯
Silverfish did very well in 2001
nope insurance did not pay to fix. wasn't worth the cost.
Exactly what they did to the two towers in New York. Countless demolition experts across the world called it out and were suppressed.
For nearly 23 years now that's been suggested/suspected.
To see Building 7 collapsing in on itself many hours later---to this day, it still strikes me as very odd. To my knowledge why it took so long to fall ---and so neatly---has never been explained to the public's satisfaction. It did appear to be the result of a controlled demolition when compared with this one in the video and with numerous other implosions found online. I certainly understand the reason for suspicions continuing to float around out there.
That’s exactly what it looks like when a passenger jet flies into a building 🤔
😂❤!!!!
It fell very similar to those certain buildings that………..well anyways
Looks just like tower 7, only a bit taller.
@@InterviewsWithTheAncients it doesn’t take rocket science to figure out what ACTUALLY happened to 7 WTC that day. Can’t believe people still perpetuated lies all of these years later.
@@InterviewsWithTheAncients Bingo. 7WTC (much taller than this) fell after it was hit by another building and consumed by an uncontrolled inferno. No booms. The high explosives used in an actual controlled demolition can be heard for miles. I've seen five of them and I always think "Anyone who thinks this is what happened to 7WTC is braindead".
Tower 7 was around 800 feet, this building is like maybe 200 feet in size.
You shouldn't have done that
Twin towers come to mind when I see this.
Learn the difference between a progressive collapse and a controlled demolition.
Ray Charles can see that the same thing happened in New York.
Looks like a big eyesore just got removed. Look around the area, nothing that big and grotesque anywhere near by.
looks like september 11
0:40 that woman was stolen 💀
Looks like world trade center bulding 7
911 again?
The tower was significantly damaged in 2020 by Category 4 Hurricane Laura. The building lost the majority of its windows, and the side of the building facing south was destroyed. As of 2023, the building remained vacant and the city had given the new owners a deadline of November 2024 to either repair or demolish the structure.
Title is misleading the masses to test your intelligence
@@helennethers9777not really
They didn't photoshop the plane! Oops!
Lake Charles was damaged harder that any other town.
How do you damage a lake exactly?
@@dogmannzit a city name
@@dogmannzit’s a city, I live here
Fast so schnell runter gegangen wie WTC 7.
Looks like the implosion of the Twin Towers of NY on 9/11 to us.
Stole my comment.
How original.
Also, this is not an implosion, it's a controlled demolition explosion, yes even the "journalists" that posted this doesn't know what the word means
@@dragons_red And ignorant. When it comes to 9/11 conspiracies, all the nutjobs become structural engineers.
Thats not how implosions work
It gives a clean explanation for the youth what the World Trade Center buildings happened with 23 years ago...
I remember seeing some implosions in Fall of 2001 and being quiet about it after reading the room.
It was also the local car wash day
Look like harris in the debate
🤔 Hmmm. Looks just like the twin towers
Except not at all.
Looks familiar
Should they be worried a cloud of toxic compounds may be drifting towqrds them?
Yes.