Absolutely correct approach. Don't waste your time with these Charlatans of Paul. Five minutes is more than enough to determine their motives. Shoo them off. They have nothing to offer from their religion so their strategy is to keep beating around the bush and have you chase after their nonsense so you are kept occupied from engaging true seekers of Truth. You will see them trolling around eavesdropping and trying to disrupt any conversation where the listener is showing interest in the dawa.
Christians missionaries cannnot hold a serious debate with muslims without falling into insults or jumping topics each time they run out of arguments. They always end running away. It's to hard for them to admit that Islam is the Truth from God. At the end of the day we know that God guides whoever He wants to the straight path.
It's rude not to look at the person you are having a conversation with. No wonder he can't understand what is being explained to him. Unfortunately his mind was already made up before he came to ask those questions
When you've been told the torture and murder of an innocent man can bring something good into your life and give you access to heaven in the hereafter and believed that Greco-Roman nonsense, you lose your capability to differentiate between right and wrong for life !
Keep in mind that English is not the source of knowledge. It's even not the language of Jesus. This is exactly like reading an instruction manual for a product that is completely different from the original text. Imagine claiming that it's the original, despite being written by an anonymous author years after the product was released. Jazak Allah Khair Sheik Yusif 💐
Liar, Imam Malik RA from second century AH include: Muwatta of Malik: Malik bin Anas (d. 179 AH) was the founder of Maliki school of jurisprudence. The Muwatta’ of Malik was compiled in mid-second century AH. from first century AH: Sahifa al-Sahihiyya of Hammam: This is perhaps one of the earliest known hadith collections. Hammam was a student of Abu Hurrairah and well-known among the scholars of the hadith to be trustworthy. Musannaf of Abd al-Razzaq: Harald Motzki, who mentioned it as a source of authentic ahadith of the first century AH, concludes: “While studying it, I came to the conclusion that the theory championed by Goldziher, Schacht, and in their footsteps, many others - myself included - which in general, reject hadith literature as a historically reliable sources for the first century AH, deprives the historical study of early Islam of an important and a useful type of source.”
This guy coming back again!
well said by the brother at the start, steadfast on his point and deen, may Allah send blessings to a warrior of islam
Unlike the bible the Quran isn’t a biography of Muhammad pbuh
بارك الله فيك
Don't give him another chance, and you'll be like him in foolishness!!
Absolutely correct approach. Don't waste your time with these Charlatans of Paul. Five minutes is more than enough to determine their motives. Shoo them off. They have nothing to offer from their religion so their strategy is to keep beating around the bush and have you chase after their nonsense so you are kept occupied from engaging true seekers of Truth. You will see them trolling around eavesdropping and trying to disrupt any conversation where the listener is showing interest in the dawa.
Dont debate for the sake of debate. Convey the message & leave the guidance to Allah.
That's what happens when falsehood perishes !!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Why does John not look at Yusuf when talking?
A broken man that is scared of the truth will be hesitant to look at one who speaks the truth
Quran isn't an autobiography of the Prophet
Exactly 👍❤️
Christians missionaries cannnot hold a serious debate with muslims without falling into insults or jumping topics each time they run out of arguments. They always end running away. It's to hard for them to admit that Islam is the Truth from God. At the end of the day we know that God guides whoever He wants to the straight path.
What else they can do when even they know they stand on nothing.
It's rude not to look at the person you are having a conversation with. No wonder he can't understand what is being explained to him. Unfortunately his mind was already made up before he came to ask those questions
When you've been told the torture and murder of an innocent man can bring something good into your life and give you access to heaven in the hereafter and believed that Greco-Roman nonsense, you lose your capability to differentiate between right and wrong for life !
Poor man. He said, it doesn't exist. How many times do you want him to answer?
Sahih Muslim 1602
20:09 just watch from here as it's productive for knowledge, rather than waste 20 minutes 👍
Keep in mind that English is not the source of knowledge. It's even not the language of Jesus. This is exactly like reading an instruction manual for a product that is completely different from the original text. Imagine claiming that it's the original, despite being written by an anonymous author years after the product was released. Jazak Allah Khair Sheik Yusif 💐
I challenge any Muslim here to tell me the name of their god! Your god doesn’t have a name!😂😂😂
This guy only want to see himself on camera
C'mon yusuf go easy on the popes. Belly getting big bwoy.
This man is very irritating he has no manners
Crazy missionary
allah knows best,yusif suggest it's better to speak to people they can lie to or deceit through their dawah script!!😂
Allah knows best you will be trolling
Allah knows best who will be trolling
Liar, Imam Malik RA from second century AH include: Muwatta of Malik: Malik bin Anas (d. 179 AH) was the founder of Maliki school of jurisprudence. The Muwatta’ of Malik was compiled in mid-second century AH. from first century AH: Sahifa al-Sahihiyya of Hammam: This is perhaps one of the earliest known hadith collections. Hammam was a student of Abu Hurrairah and well-known among the scholars of the hadith to be trustworthy. Musannaf of Abd al-Razzaq: Harald Motzki, who mentioned it as a source of authentic ahadith of the first century AH, concludes: “While studying it, I came to the conclusion that the theory championed by Goldziher, Schacht, and in their footsteps, many others - myself included - which in general, reject hadith literature as a historically reliable sources for the first century AH, deprives the historical study of early Islam of an important and a useful type of source.”