@@Tyrin_Wolfinzar And they want to build Su-75 lol they can't even produce Su-57 which is rubbish compared to F22 and F35 haha and they dream to build S75 and PAK DA.
Like you said in the intro. IF it even exists. ! Let alone ready to be in service. It's all good having it on the drawing board. It's quite another to be ready and able to drop ordinance. Don't get me wrong , I'm a fan of Russian design and it's due respect. . It just seems an awful lot of their cutting edge technology. Is just theoretical .
Russia is doing the same thing they did in the cold war , making a bunch of false claims hoping the US spends tons of money to counter their “ new stealth bomber” Hell there new SU-57 was shot down in Ukraine with shoulder fired surface to air missiles. That would probably never happen to a f22 or f35.
So, just to get this straight: The B-21 is in the works since 2015 and still hasn't flown. It is being developed by the same folks, that already build the B-2, so it is fairly safe to assume, they know what they are doing and they also know a thing or two about stealth tech. And now, here are the Russians. Total stealth aircraft in service: 0. Total stealth aircraft flown: 0. Total stealth aircraft designed: 0. And they claim they design, build, fly, test, mass-produce and deliver a complete stealth bomber weapons system in the same 7 years, it took Northrop Grumman from the start of the B-21 Project to now, which arguably did not yield a mass-produced stealth bomber weapon system yet? No way Russia will pull this off. Same goes for stealth-defying radar. Since 25 years, there have been various rumors about radar systems capable of detecting stealth planes, but noone has fielded any system. Germany has an experimental system, which is rumored to be capable of detecting a F-35. But this project cooperates heavily with the US military and it is a safe bet, any results will be shared and scrutinized together, allowing improvments to the stealth capabilities. And do not forget: Germany is going to buy F-35s - which we clearly would not do, if there is proof of its stealth capabilities being useless. The US has managed to maintain its lead in stealth tech for several decades and I see no indication of that changing anytime soon. Remember, a weapons platform needs to be fielded, operated, maintained and used to full effect. Making a funny drawing on a napkin does not count.
@@loucyphers_nightmare Stealth is not invisibility or being totally undetectable. More often it's about making it difficult for the enemy to accurately target you. Those big radar arrays can probably see almost anything in the air, but the narrow band radar used for things like missile lock-on are where stealth comes into play. You might know there's a stealth jet somewhere in the area but if you can't pinpoint the aircraft then you can't shoot it.
Makes me wonder why we are putting so much money into expensive stealth aircraft with a short lifespan, while we are still flying the B-52. That is anything but stealth. Now grandchildren of retired B-52 pilots are flying those machines. My feeling is that getting close enough to the target and letting loose with cruise missiles and then head home. I wish this money was spent on good things, like zero-point energy, anti-grav aircraft, increased production of food, research into better battery technology to elevate the need for slave labor to dig for rare earth material. The trillions of dollars spent could have been used to develop much safer and better passenger aircraft, more passenger railroads to major cities, etc. We just spend money to kill people.
@@bondgabebond4907 Actually it is quite simple: Planes, like the B-2/B-21, F-35 and so on are initial deep-strike weapons. Their primary objective is, to go in first, go in deep and knock out air defenses. Once that is done, it is FAR more economical to send a heavy-lift-monster like the B-52, which is comparatively cheap to operate and either use standoff wepaons or masses of freefall bombs to deal damage. In short. B-52's are cheap and carry loads of stuff. Once the stealth weapon system have cleared enemy air-defenses, they can go in. Likewise, active air defense countermeasures have also come a long way. A modernized B-52 is quite capable in defeating enemy air-defense attacks. It makes absolute sense to keep the B-52s in service. But I am totally wiht you in thinking, that these weapons are a waste of time an effort. Unfortunately, they are required in a world full of Putins, Xis and Trumps.
No doubt. Why didn't they just put a conventional tail on it? Also, that's a lot of glass on a "stealth" airplane. Will be interesting to see if they got the engine intakes right too.
I think its safe to say that nobody actually believes in Russian Defense manufacturing anymore. This will work about as well as Russian Airforce in Ukraine-Russia still cannot attain air dominance after 6 months against a vastly inferior opponent.
taliban didnt give a damn about your flashy toys and sent you home after 20 years you didnt win your objective there is no democracy in afghanistan and taliban are still in rule epic failure , sandal weaing people with no tech beat your boys and gave them ptsd having balls is more imprtant then anything they held out for 20 years against 30 + country coalition while you sat in kabul virtue signalling
Is Russia planning to sell these to other countries? Can they afford to produce them if they don't? I'm guessing no and no, but I'm interested in hearing their thoughts.
When they finally master creating even a basic working Tank, or Air defence system, then the Russians can allow themselves the fantasy of Aircraft like this image.
With the sanctions, Russia is going to be lucky to design a new crackerjacks box..... let alone a new stealth bomber that is actually going to be stealthy and something besides just a good looking model or drawing on paper. Putin has insured that they will never be on the cutting edge in military equipment development.
20 years from now there will be one of these in a museum; a non-functional prototype. The Russians will have built one more, but it will probably fall apart during some test mission. Russia doesn't need these because Russia isn't an empire anymore. It needs to focus on it's economy to have a meaningful future.
@ I'll correct you: They are focusing on invading a sovereign neighbor and alienating themselves from everyone that isn't China, Pakistan or Iran. This will end badly for them. Have a nice day.
I was right in the middle of taking a drink when he said TASS said it would exceed the B-21's capabilities, which caused me to laugh and shoot Pepsi out my nose..
I imagine that there are quick reacting fast weapons that can detect when the bomb bay doors open and hit it before they close. There might even be something that can disable a nuclear bomb on the way down.
And regular hit to kill projectile that can actually hit the warhead should be capable of disabling any implosion type bomb (like all of em since the 60s and certainly anything shoved on smaller modern delivery vehicles will be as well). To get a nuclear detonation in implosion type bombs the shockwave from the conventional explosive shaped into lenses (extremely precise and being hit will change it's performance) needs to converge on the pit extremely symmetrically if it's off by just 5% it'll just blow it apart and spread some highly radioactive core material around but not actually achieve a nuclear/thermonuclear detonation.
Really great and one of the reasons is you were sure to use the caveat...might be for propaganda purposes only. They did that in the Cold War to elicit a very costly response from the US. Thank you, you're doing great work. I'm sorry i'm not in a postion to donate or I would.
Don't think the SR-71 was EVER thought of in terms of 'stealth'. No plane can operate at even 100,000 feet, let alone 164,000. And this channel of ALL channels, knows that. What Gives?
The rate at which the Russians are able to produce such high tech vaporware is simply astounding. I suspect the S-7000 Air Defense system should be up and running by Christmas.
@@thurlravenscroft2572 yeah but Lockheed entry into the program looks a lot like the bomber in the video if they are legit, search for Lockheed Rockwell stealth bomber
@@Meteorknite nope that’s a myth. The B-2 is based on flying wing designs made by the founder of Northrop. When some documentary filmmakers asked Northrop Grumman about if the B-2 took any design inspiration from German WW2 designs they were not even aware that the Germans had had any flying wing designs, but they were curious so they built a mock-up of the German design with some accident stealth upgrades and tested it in their RCS lab which revealed it was no more stealth than any general flying wing design would expect to be and was completely detected by British WW2 radar at a distance that would still be over the channel.
Russians: “But wait, we have an even better bomber than the Pak Da, it’s called the Puke Duh and it’s even more stealthier and faster than any American bomber!”
They can’t even maintain what they have. Having some drawings and even small mock-ups is one thing, getting something real is another. At this Point the US is working on 7th generation designs, with 6th gen almost at the production stage. They can’t even get significant numbers of Su-57s which are a low-5th generation.
I highly doubt that a first generation unproven Russian attempt at a stealth bomber will come close to a second generation replacement to the only stealthiest and most proven stealth bombers succeeding design platform made by the wealthiest country with by far the most experience building stealth platforms that also have real world proven combat experience its just soo improbable that it’s as close to impossible as it comes
As you very eloquently point out in your video about China's Xian H-20, the PROC has already left the Russian Federation in the turbulence of her technological jet wash. Meanwhile, the technological gap between the USA and Russia continues to widen in America's favor.
Even if we grant Russia the achievement of world class stealth they will make how many of them? Their stealth fighter, the PAK FA or SU-57, has been around for decades and yet they have a total of, what, 15 of them. Even the US has had limited production runs of their leading edge AC but while Russia's limited run is maybe 20 the US is more like 200. And, when you look closer you find there stealth capabilities are an order of magnitude less impressive than the US and that's being kind to them -- whereas the US works hard for all-aspect stealth Russia focuses on frontal stealth and they are more than a factor of ten less capable even with such limited aspect stealth. Then, take into account that the huge source of foreign money they used to have is drying up and going away thanks to their stupid leader and his evil plans!
What kind of electronics will this have? Will it run on vacuum tubes? Last time I checked, semiconductors are a little hard to come by in Russia these days.
164,000 feet ??? Really??? I read a book written by English Electric Lightning pilots, were one pilot mentioned conducting intercepts on an American bomber at 100,000 feet, but he said the bomber climbed to 120,000 feet and he could not reach it??? I know of no American bomber that can fly that high, at least officially. Is this pilot lying or could this be real, not to mention that it was the 1960 or 1970, i can't remember when.
At 164,000 feet altitude, mach 1 is approximately 25 nts (30 mph). Since the plane is subsonic, it must have a stall speed lower than that. -not likely
Russia is trying to keep up with the US, but the US spends orders of magnitude more on defense and has done so for many, many years. And they certainly don't want another Concordski on their hands.
🤔 Might've been better suited for the _Paper Skies_ channel.... lol As just because there was a physical model made, doesn't mean it's exists, *even on paper* for that matter! After all, we already know how far Russia likes to stretch the truthfulness of their words... 😏 We'd call something a rubberband, whereas Russia would call it an "advanced, synthetic, reusable, high-energy storage device" 😂
Good thing about modern Russian military hardware is that it's only built for military parades and the like. When they fielded some of the advanced systems they actually have in service, they failed miserably in Ukraine.
Here´s the thing. Consider what each stealth airplane project cost the US. Each single one was a gigantic project with enormous costs associated with it. And that is with the US and the participating companies having experience in the field of stealth airplanes. Now take a look at Russia. They´re heavily reliant on arms sales to even fund their projects. They have nearly no experience to draw from and their manufacturing capabilities are desolate. So how is a state, which has the average GDP of Texas, supposed to do what took the US an obscene amount of money with but a fraction of the associated development costs and no international partners? Because lets face it, if Russia was to try and produce such an airplane, they´d need partners and/or buyers. And a lot of them. So there´s no way this thing stays hidden for so long when potential buyers/partners would require a tech demonstration at least halfway along the way. Russia is not capable of pulling off an F22 kind of endeveour where a huge chunk of money gets blown on a project which then gets slapped with an export ban and all the cost needs to be paid in full by the taxpayer. So yeah, the only advanced weapons i believe the russians are capable of producing are any types of balistic missiles. Anything beyond that they know they lack the resources in personel, training and maintenance capability to effectively utilize on the battlefield. They wanna hide beyond this masquerade of a potential missile threat and some obscure high tech weapon systems which they wanna make the world believe they have stockpiled in some hidden facility.
The heart of the Russian military is there Submarine force witch is vary capable. I guess it’s the route I would go also if my military budget was more limited.
Knowing what we know, no problem. Not knowing what we should know, naughty. Thinking we know what we surely do not, disaster. Hey Vlad, did you ever read fear and loathing? My favorite line was , Hey Vlad go
If they're also updating the TU-160 (which does exist), then it's probably not a stretch to reckon that PAK DA is just a tease, like the Boom supersonic airliner supposedly in development in the US. When it doesn't come into service in 2027, the official explanation will be "we re-evaluated our priorities and achieved our objectives with the updated TU-160", in exactly the same way as the US achieved its heavy bomber objectives by updating the 70-year-old B-52.
As usual, Russia will build 2-3 prototypes, fly them over the Red Square and then realize that it can’t be produce them 😳
And only let them be flown by chechens on tiktok
Just like the ol Soviet days lol
Just like their 10 or so prototype and "6 serial" Su-57's that have yet to see any combat, used for air shows and are absolute garbage. 😆
@@Tyrin_Wolfinzar And they want to build Su-75 lol they can't even produce Su-57 which is rubbish compared to F22 and F35 haha and they dream to build S75 and PAK DA.
They do that to drive the Americans crazy.
US: “It’s so stealthy you don’t see it coming”
Russia: “So stealthy you don’t even know if it exists.”
Russia: “so stealthy we didn’t know it existed until we watched Dark Tech”
@@willpemberton6823 Ha,
You could go so far as to argue that a plane that does not and never will exist is the stealthiest of all planes.
It is called the PAK DA because:
PAK -> Paper AirKraft, it exists in no other form
DA -> Ivan's answer when you ask if it totally exists
And that's exactly the response they want from the US.
Like you said in the intro. IF it even exists. ! Let alone ready to be in service. It's all good having it on the drawing board. It's quite another to be ready and able to drop ordinance. Don't get me wrong , I'm a fan of Russian design and it's due respect. . It just seems an awful lot of their cutting edge technology. Is just theoretical .
@@cmilly3970 it spelled China dumb dumb
@@cmilly3970 The difference being China actually has the money. The SU-57 program fell apart once the Indian government said they weren't buying.
Russia is doing the same thing they did in the cold war , making a bunch of false claims hoping the US spends tons of money to counter their “ new stealth bomber” Hell there new SU-57 was shot down in Ukraine with shoulder fired surface to air missiles. That would probably never happen to a f22 or f35.
So, just to get this straight: The B-21 is in the works since 2015 and still hasn't flown. It is being developed by the same folks, that already build the B-2, so it is fairly safe to assume, they know what they are doing and they also know a thing or two about stealth tech.
And now, here are the Russians. Total stealth aircraft in service: 0. Total stealth aircraft flown: 0. Total stealth aircraft designed: 0. And they claim they design, build, fly, test, mass-produce and deliver a complete stealth bomber weapons system in the same 7 years, it took Northrop Grumman from the start of the B-21 Project to now, which arguably did not yield a mass-produced stealth bomber weapon system yet? No way Russia will pull this off.
Same goes for stealth-defying radar. Since 25 years, there have been various rumors about radar systems capable of detecting stealth planes, but noone has fielded any system. Germany has an experimental system, which is rumored to be capable of detecting a F-35. But this project cooperates heavily with the US military and it is a safe bet, any results will be shared and scrutinized together, allowing improvments to the stealth capabilities. And do not forget: Germany is going to buy F-35s - which we clearly would not do, if there is proof of its stealth capabilities being useless.
The US has managed to maintain its lead in stealth tech for several decades and I see no indication of that changing anytime soon. Remember, a weapons platform needs to be fielded, operated, maintained and used to full effect. Making a funny drawing on a napkin does not count.
I've always wondered, if you're unable to produce stealth aircraft then how do you produce a radar to detect stealth aircraft
@@loucyphers_nightmare Stealth is not invisibility or being totally undetectable. More often it's about making it difficult for the enemy to accurately target you. Those big radar arrays can probably see almost anything in the air, but the narrow band radar used for things like missile lock-on are where stealth comes into play. You might know there's a stealth jet somewhere in the area but if you can't pinpoint the aircraft then you can't shoot it.
@@CausticLemons7 : I know all about what you said, I guess my Sarcasm didn't shine through and that's my fault
Makes me wonder why we are putting so much money into expensive stealth aircraft with a short lifespan, while we are still flying the B-52. That is anything but stealth. Now grandchildren of retired B-52 pilots are flying those machines. My feeling is that getting close enough to the target and letting loose with cruise missiles and then head home. I wish this money was spent on good things, like zero-point energy, anti-grav aircraft, increased production of food, research into better battery technology to elevate the need for slave labor to dig for rare earth material. The trillions of dollars spent could have been used to develop much safer and better passenger aircraft, more passenger railroads to major cities, etc. We just spend money to kill people.
@@bondgabebond4907 Actually it is quite simple: Planes, like the B-2/B-21, F-35 and so on are initial deep-strike weapons. Their primary objective is, to go in first, go in deep and knock out air defenses. Once that is done, it is FAR more economical to send a heavy-lift-monster like the B-52, which is comparatively cheap to operate and either use standoff wepaons or masses of freefall bombs to deal damage.
In short. B-52's are cheap and carry loads of stuff. Once the stealth weapon system have cleared enemy air-defenses, they can go in.
Likewise, active air defense countermeasures have also come a long way. A modernized B-52 is quite capable in defeating enemy air-defense attacks.
It makes absolute sense to keep the B-52s in service. But I am totally wiht you in thinking, that these weapons are a waste of time an effort. Unfortunately, they are required in a world full of Putins, Xis and Trumps.
I love how those winglets will talk to our radars!🤣
No doubt. Why didn't they just put a conventional tail on it? Also, that's a lot of glass on a "stealth" airplane. Will be interesting to see if they got the engine intakes right too.
Russia and China:
"Stealth is over rated, stealth can easily be overcome"
Also Russia and China:
"Check out this new stealthy aircraft"
The PAK-DA will remain very much subsonic with an operational speed of 0 km/h
Hey! Some of those yachts will make 24 knots!
oh aren't we the witty one... ugh
no no, see it is just so fast that the speed indicator rolled over to 0 km/h 😂
same with brexitland/japan(?) tempest, FCAS and turkey 5th gen
If they produce more than 2 of them I'll be shocked.
They want even finish one - it will be like the Buran. If they could make one, the chimney stack sticking out of the top will give it away.
two that work.
They can't beat Ukraine bro 😅😅😅
I think its safe to say that nobody actually believes in Russian Defense manufacturing anymore. This will work about as well as Russian Airforce in Ukraine-Russia still cannot attain air dominance after 6 months against a vastly inferior opponent.
Lol.
Hitting the ground so they wont get hit by missiles
But we’re winning……🥴
Yeah... this thing is a model on some oligarchs desk. A wet dream.
They literally can’t even avoid Soviet air defenses designed for 3rd generation aircraft 💀
Loving these types of videos, and the comments that come with them!😁 Keep them coming dude!
Yeah right, just like the Armata
Between the oligarchs and the state of their economy I figure the 1st flight will be around 2060.
Yay
The ruble is worth more today than it has been for the past 6 years
@@informationwarlord no.
@@AugmentedGravity yes. You're not entitled to your own facts. The ruble is at it's highest value since 2015. It's an undisputable reality.
@@informationwarlord entitled to my own facts? What?😂 you know why the ruple is worth «so much»?😂
They'll make 2 and both will fail. They look good in their comic books
taliban didnt give a damn about your flashy toys and sent you home after 20 years you didnt win your objective there is no democracy in afghanistan and taliban are still in rule epic failure , sandal weaing people with no tech beat your boys and gave them ptsd having balls is more imprtant then anything they held out for 20 years against 30 + country coalition while you sat in kabul virtue signalling
With technology that they stole from the U.S.
U are anti Russia hatred in u glory Russia 🇷🇺 😂😂😂
The winglets and intake along the leading edge will likely betray it on radar. If detectable and targetable, it’s a moot point.
in 3d animations it always works :D
I'll believe it when I see it. I have an incredibly difficult time thinking Russia has the money or the chips to build this.
Russia has around a dozen Su-57 "stealth" jets. In a few years NATO will have over 4000. Good luck Russia.
Important differantiator «stealth».
You are right but this factor will force Russia to throw nuclear missiles and Russians missile are the best technologicaly
@@dimitrismitalakis2803 😂😂😂
@@dimitrismitalakis2803”Russian missiles are the best” citation needed
At best they are trying to catch up to the B 2 Spirit.
The B 21 will be a upgrade so they will still be playing catch up.
More like catching up to b-52s
as long as they have nukes they can chill out and save their money
Come on. Russia is losing their touch. Where is the hype words like hypersonic.
Right…it’s really funny cause hypersonic has been around forever by now it’s getting this hype
Is Russia planning to sell these to other countries? Can they afford to produce them if they don't? I'm guessing no and no, but I'm interested in hearing their thoughts.
I'll buy one for $5.00. They have one potential customer.
never mind the "can they afford it" , but are they even able to produce any, even if they did have money for it? (what with the sanctions and all)
When they finally master creating even a basic working Tank, or Air defence system, then the Russians can allow themselves the fantasy of Aircraft like this image.
It will be an amazing mega yacht! Meanwhile tank turrets are flying higher than it will ever fly
With the sanctions, Russia is going to be lucky to design a new crackerjacks box..... let alone a new stealth bomber that is actually going to be stealthy and something besides just a good looking model or drawing on paper. Putin has insured that they will never be on the cutting edge in military equipment development.
20 years from now there will be one of these in a museum; a non-functional prototype. The Russians will have built one more, but it will probably fall apart during some test mission.
Russia doesn't need these because Russia isn't an empire anymore. It needs to focus on it's economy to have a meaningful future.
@ I'll correct you: They are focusing on invading a sovereign neighbor and alienating themselves from everyone that isn't China, Pakistan or Iran. This will end badly for them.
Have a nice day.
I was right in the middle of taking a drink when he said TASS said it would exceed the B-21's capabilities, which caused me to laugh and shoot Pepsi out my nose..
At 165K feet - this is beyond the range of SM6 anti air missiles
I imagine that there are quick reacting fast weapons that can detect when the bomb bay doors open and hit it before they close.
There might even be something that can disable a nuclear bomb on the way down.
And regular hit to kill projectile that can actually hit the warhead should be capable of disabling any implosion type bomb (like all of em since the 60s and certainly anything shoved on smaller modern delivery vehicles will be as well). To get a nuclear detonation in implosion type bombs the shockwave from the conventional explosive shaped into lenses (extremely precise and being hit will change it's performance) needs to converge on the pit extremely symmetrically if it's off by just 5% it'll just blow it apart and spread some highly radioactive core material around but not actually achieve a nuclear/thermonuclear detonation.
Really great and one of the reasons is you were sure to use the caveat...might be for propaganda purposes only. They did that in the Cold War to elicit a very costly response from the US. Thank you, you're doing great work. I'm sorry i'm not in a postion to donate or I would.
Don't think the SR-71 was EVER thought of in terms of 'stealth'. No plane can operate at even 100,000 feet, let alone 164,000. And this channel of ALL channels, knows that. What Gives?
Oh yes it was.
What Gives? Clicks, Likes, and Subscribes.
None of which have anything to do with any aircraft, real or imagined.
This plane is automatic, it's systematic, it's hydromatic, and the Russians hope no one remembers what that means
Crapomatic
Just add GREASE! It’ll work then.
Intriguing video as always. Thank you for your hard work putting these videos together!!!
🌴☀️🌴
Love the “White Swan”, such a beautiful aircraft
designed and built in Ukraine too lol
@@KingDWS but under Soviet funds and leadership
The rate at which the Russians are able to produce such high tech vaporware is simply astounding. I suspect the S-7000 Air Defense system should be up and running by Christmas.
Given Russia's "tech" seen in Ukraine I doubt even Andorra would now fear Russian Military Might.
Looks a lot like the Lockeed/Rockwell program Concept for the Stealth Bomber program that lost to the Northrop Design for the B-2
Northrop Grumman built the B-2 and the XB-35.
@@thurlravenscroft2572 yeah but Lockheed entry into the program looks a lot like the bomber in the video if they are legit,
search for Lockheed Rockwell stealth bomber
B2 itself is based onGerman designs.
Theres no looking like here Its german tech
@@Meteorknite nope that’s a myth. The B-2 is based on flying wing designs made by the founder of Northrop. When some documentary filmmakers asked Northrop Grumman about if the B-2 took any design inspiration from German WW2 designs they were not even aware that the Germans had had any flying wing designs, but they were curious so they built a mock-up of the German design with some accident stealth upgrades and tested it in their RCS lab which revealed it was no more stealth than any general flying wing design would expect to be and was completely detected by British WW2 radar at a distance that would still be over the channel.
They can’t even afford more than 6 SU-57s which keep crashing
Not only they are steaming full speed ahead with this project - they are in fact building 6 prototypes.
reallity is that with enough radars you can still see every plane that exists today, include all stealth planes.
As stated. The Russian design philosophy is multi-tiered. Which in my opinion produces a more well rounded aircraft system.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Well they you have a very I’ll informed o-inion but thanks for sharing!
This aircraft better be stealthy as hell
I'd be surprised if its stealthy as B-2 lol no way will it be revolutionary as The B-21 Raider😆👍
the b21 is just a smaller b-2 with less payload and range but probably more modern tech and stealth
there’s a zero percent chance this will ever be a reality
PAK DA is similar to Russia’s stealthy subs. They rarely need to leave safe harbor and they don’t need to either.
Building one is one thing. Maintenance and keeping it flying is another.
They will order the plane on Ali Express.... Just like they order everything else
Russia falls apart before inventing some new strategic bomber
Thats nice helps to have a funtioning military though. Belongs in the same category as their nuclear torpedos and cruise missiles
It looks like a knock off of NASA's blended wing body design demonstrator.
Russians: “But wait, we have an even better bomber than the Pak Da, it’s called the Puke Duh and it’s even more stealthier and faster than any American bomber!”
They can’t even maintain what they have. Having some drawings and even small mock-ups is one thing, getting something real is another. At this Point the US is working on 7th generation designs, with 6th gen almost at the production stage. They can’t even get significant numbers of Su-57s which are a low-5th generation.
I highly doubt that a first generation unproven Russian attempt at a stealth bomber will come close to a second generation replacement to the only stealthiest and most proven stealth bombers succeeding design platform made by the wealthiest country with by far the most experience building stealth platforms that also have real world proven combat experience its just soo improbable that it’s as close to impossible as it comes
As you very eloquently point out in your video about China's Xian H-20, the PROC has already left the Russian Federation in the turbulence of her technological jet wash. Meanwhile, the technological gap between the USA and Russia continues to widen in America's favor.
Who do you think china got its jet engine tech from stolen or brought with money whatever which country again ?
Even if we grant Russia the achievement of world class stealth they will make how many of them? Their stealth fighter, the PAK FA or SU-57, has been around for decades and yet they have a total of, what, 15 of them. Even the US has had limited production runs of their leading edge AC but while Russia's limited run is maybe 20 the US is more like 200. And, when you look closer you find there stealth capabilities are an order of magnitude less impressive than the US and that's being kind to them -- whereas the US works hard for all-aspect stealth Russia focuses on frontal stealth and they are more than a factor of ten less capable even with such limited aspect stealth. Then, take into account that the huge source of foreign money they used to have is drying up and going away thanks to their stupid leader and his evil plans!
overkill. redundant. waste of money and effort.
👑
love,
david
What kind of electronics will this have? Will it run on vacuum tubes? Last time I checked, semiconductors are a little hard to come by in Russia these days.
Tubes?At least it will have a nice sound system LOL
My thoughts exactly, maybe they'll use a mechanical computer with wax cylinders for the programing --- lol
Wow , that's an impressive use of plywood, can't tell there a mig29 under thete
They can't afford it. We constantly keep them scratching for Rubles to keep up with us.
One day all the roubles poured into this program will be found… as real estate in London and yachts in Monaco harbour.
164,000 feet ??? Really??? I read a book written by English Electric Lightning pilots, were one pilot mentioned conducting intercepts on an American bomber at 100,000 feet, but he said the bomber climbed to 120,000 feet and he could not reach it??? I know of no American bomber that can fly that high, at least officially. Is this pilot lying or could this be real, not to mention that it was the 1960 or 1970, i can't remember when.
At 164,000 feet altitude, mach 1 is approximately 25 nts (30 mph). Since the plane is subsonic, it must have a stall speed lower than that. -not likely
As a player of SimplePlanes, I appreciate the use of player made models in this video.
Enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
It was also be made of a “Super alloy” developed in secret by main developers 3yo
😂
Russia is trying to keep up with the US, but the US spends orders of magnitude more on defense and has done so for many, many years. And they certainly don't want another Concordski on their hands.
This aircraft is least 10 years out. If ever after this war maybe a pipe dream.
Thanks.
🤔 Might've been better suited for the _Paper Skies_ channel.... lol
As just because there was a physical model made, doesn't mean it's exists, *even on paper* for that matter! After all, we already know how far Russia likes to stretch the truthfulness of their words... 😏
We'd call something a rubberband, whereas Russia would call it an "advanced, synthetic, reusable, high-energy storage device" 😂
…but can it fly higher than a T-72 turret?
allegedly the tu-160 keeps breaking a bunch of records
@Dark Tech "If it even exists"? Were you talking about the world or the plane?
The craft depicted looks like it's ready for an IR shot in the rear
Cool! That only puts them what...50 years behind the US?
Maybe it’ll be as good as their reactive armor
Umm, they laughed at Noah too until the flood came! Never underestimate the enemy!
The wing tips on there own will make this plane 100× more visible than the night hawk in daylight
So it'll be like the pak 50. They'll make two prototypes over 20 years and then park em on a runway.
rofl, "We're super close to doing it, guys. We already built a model out of wood!"
Yeah ever since that Solarwinds hack by golly they seem to have all the cool shit right
Aircraft is far from stealth ... The Russians have missed The concept..
For sure! :D
Is this in response to the intake duct designs being published??
This is a great comedy video keep them coming!🤣😂
164,000 feet with 60,000 lbs of ordnance with a crew of 4. Dream on.
Good thing about modern Russian military hardware is that it's only built for military parades and the like. When they fielded some of the advanced systems they actually have in service, they failed miserably in Ukraine.
i guess UA must be winning then, right?
Ahhhhh..... don't they need money to build that?
What happened to the su 57? And the new checkmate fighter? 🤔
My man big Poot is learning all the wrong things about German history
Here´s the thing.
Consider what each stealth airplane project cost the US. Each single one was a gigantic project with enormous costs associated with it. And that is with the US and the participating companies having experience in the field of stealth airplanes.
Now take a look at Russia. They´re heavily reliant on arms sales to even fund their projects. They have nearly no experience to draw from and their manufacturing capabilities are desolate.
So how is a state, which has the average GDP of Texas, supposed to do what took the US an obscene amount of money with but a fraction of the associated development costs and no international partners? Because lets face it, if Russia was to try and produce such an airplane, they´d need partners and/or buyers. And a lot of them. So there´s no way this thing stays hidden for so long when potential buyers/partners would require a tech demonstration at least halfway along the way.
Russia is not capable of pulling off an F22 kind of endeveour where a huge chunk of money gets blown on a project which then gets slapped with an export ban and all the cost needs to be paid in full by the taxpayer.
So yeah, the only advanced weapons i believe the russians are capable of producing are any types of balistic missiles. Anything beyond that they know they lack the resources in personel, training and maintenance capability to effectively utilize on the battlefield. They wanna hide beyond this masquerade of a potential missile threat and some obscure high tech weapon systems which they wanna make the world believe they have stockpiled in some hidden facility.
Pak Da: so stealthy that nobody at Tupolev can see it
Whoever mixed this video messed up. Music is way too loud.
I think the Easter Bunny will be the pilot of this craft, since they both actually exist in the same realm.
5:23 Is that Kerbal Space Program? I recognize that island.
Bottom line ,we don’t know what the U S , has other than what they want us to know.
Just by looking at the artist renderings, If the final version resembles them, it will have the radar cross section of a barn door.
Wonder what will ww3 be like, with all these technological advances. Can't even pick up enemies on radar, just boom
Going to be pretty hard to make that fly when all they can get are vacuum tubes for electronics
The heart of the Russian military is there Submarine force witch is vary capable. I guess it’s the route I would go also if my military budget was more limited.
Poor manufacturing of a bad practice torpedo is at fault, not the submarine.
@@howtomoo That sub was a very capable and well built sub. Look how well it held up to a huge blast.
Russia is in what scholars refer to as the, "picture book stage," of stealth development.
Knowing what we know, no problem.
Not knowing what we should know, naughty.
Thinking we know what we surely do not, disaster.
Hey Vlad, did you ever read fear and loathing?
My favorite line was , Hey Vlad go
If they're also updating the TU-160 (which does exist), then it's probably not a stretch to reckon that PAK DA is just a tease, like the Boom supersonic airliner supposedly in development in the US. When it doesn't come into service in 2027, the official explanation will be "we re-evaluated our priorities and achieved our objectives with the updated TU-160", in exactly the same way as the US achieved its heavy bomber objectives by updating the 70-year-old B-52.
This truly looks like Russia’s version of Hollywood as a digital copy
With a release date of never, and a range of zero miles more likely...