i have a projector and i will never know how cinemas got away with using 2K DCI on huge screens back in the early days of digital cinema, its 2048 x 1080. The pixels would have been massive. I get to about 135 inch and the image suffers so badly
I am thinking to buy a 34 inch ultrawide 1440p (3440*1440). I am currently using 1080p 21.5 inch. So will it be look like more sharpen than the 21.5 1080p or same.or less
Oh nice, well the 1080p is at 102 ppi, while the 3440x1440p is at 109, so your gaining a tiny pinch of detail while gaining a massive amount of screen space and size.
@@xpodx thanks a lot. I am planning to buy the mi 34 one. As it is available at 458 usd in our country. The gigabyte 32inch model is also available. Can you suggest one?
@@xpodx colors are the same for the two I'm looking at actually 'cept VA has better contrast but I'm really scared of the ghosting and smearing VA will have. Still it seems very much like the better option, thanks a ton!
No, ips will pop more will be more appealing to look at, but 1080p will be more blurry, I'd get the 1440p cuz it's sharper and still not to bad colors wise. Cheers
I'm currently using 1080P on 27inch I'm struggling to decide whether to buy another 27inch but with 1440P (can make duo monitor setup) or upgrade to 32inch with 1440P. Kindly share your thought
@Mateusz Graczyk you need good eyes period. But having 1440p 27, 4k 28, and 5k 28, I can tell you 1440p is to low for me, not as sharp, and 4k 28 100% scaling Is just fine, 5k 27" is where you have to lean way closer to read small text, but worth it.
I've done some comparing and currently I am using an ultrawide 30 inch 2560 X1080 monitor that has a 92.6 ppi so the difference in sharpness appears minimal to me over say a 27 inch 2560 x 1440 monitor that has 109 ppi. Also the added real-estate of the ultrawide makes up for the added real-estate you get with the 1440 monitor. also my monitor has a 200 hz refresh rate so gaming is pretty smooth. I had used a regular wide monitor but missed the advantages of the ultrawide so went back to it and am staying. The MSI monitor I got was only $269 on amazon. I sit about 32-34 inches from my monitor and I think a 34 inch would be too big for the slight increase in clarity for the increase in cost. Also I get decent FPS with my rtx 3060ti GPU which would drop with a 1440 monitor unless I shell out mega bucks for a new gpu.
I see, well it's true that with the 1440p you'd see only a slight clarity improvement, the total amount of pixels would be 921,600 more then the 1080p ultrawide. Which is a solid amount better. It's up to you on how you wanna spend your money and the setup you're trying to achieve, my advice would be to save for a 4k 144hz 28" or so, and sell your 2560x1080p monitor to make up some of the cost if you're looking for a sharper monitor. Up to you though. Cheers.
@@xpodx Yeah to get decent fps on a 4k you need a very expensive video card and I don't play enough games to justify the cost. I am quite satisfied with my set up as is but thanks anyways.
You'd definitely see a visual improvement. Are you on pc? You could get a 1080p 144hz 24" ips panel, or if you wanted to spend more money, 1440p 144hz/165hz 27" ips
please provide me your opinion. I.m considering 34inch ultrawide (109ppi) vs 40inch ultrawide (93ppi). Both 1440p and ips panel. Should I go with 40 inch for more space and less ppi or go with 34 inch but higher ppi? will the quality of the 40 inch monitor affected much due to the lower ppi? Thank you.
It's really close tbh... if you stick your head by your monitor side by side you'd see a slight difference, but it would be small, I would suggest whatever your budget Is and desk size, both are excellent choices.
@@xpodx thank u, im leaning more towards the 40 inch as currently i am using 29 inch 1080p ultrawide (95ppi). I guess the quality of the 40 inch will be quite similar to what i am using now.
@@mohdhafiidzjaafar9336 ha well, sharper is nicer, but if you want a bigger ultrawide you might be more limited, unless you wanna get a even higher resolution ultrawide and more money
Um.. thats pretty big for a 1440p to be closer up to your eyes.. 32" 4k is alright but can still see the pixels from 10" away or so. 27" Is nice for 1440p
@@xpodx Unfortunately I can't cancel the order. My desk is 140cm x 70cm (55inx27in), so I think there is enough space between me and the monitor. Would the PPI difference still be a dealbreaker? I'm upgrading from a 17inch 1080p laptop.
@@xpodx Got the monitor and decided to test it out. I have to say it's not bad at all! Really surprised by how crisp everything looks! Will give it a week and see if anything changes.
@@xpodx Yes im worries about the pixels, i dont want to be irritated by it. Im planning to purchase Gigabyte G27F 27'' at 1080p (IPS Panel). Do you think the pixels for this monitor or any 27 inch with 1080p, IPS panel will be it noticeable too??
@@gundamepyon5330 i think yes.. but if your 2ft away or more maybe it won't be as bad. I don't have a 27" 1080p but I'm planning on getting a 280hz 1080p 27" sometime soon.
TBH I can barely see any difference in an normal picture. You would start to see the difference when you zoom in the picture. The difference becomes visible when zoomed in the picture. I don't think most people would need that much detail in their pictures. It would be really cool to have resolution beyond than 4k but TBH you don't need them unless you're a professional video editor, video creator, etc.
Just shows you what the screens are capable of. Low res can't show you more detail cuz much less pixels. When it was just the picture in person was very noticeable, a RUclips video is compressed and doesn't look as good you know, believe me tho, its a nice improve and quality improvement. You could buy a used 4k monitor for 180 bucks on eBay and enjoy and see for yourself. Not as nice and sharp as 5k but still nice res
@@xpodx I understand what you mean. Definitely having the most latest technology would always be cool and satisfying but the reality is that most people actually don't need them and can easily make use of a technology which might not be the latest. And the thing is that you don't care about FPS, resolution,etc while playing a video game, watching a video,etc unless the FPS, resolution,etc are really shitty. But I do respect your opinion and I understand where you're coming from.
@@xpodx I don't think that most people need that much resolution,fps,etc. Even in your case I don't you are focused on resolution,FPS, etc while playing a video game unless it's really shitty FPS, resolution, etc. I also play video games but I don't care about FPS, resolution, etc as long as I can clearly see the video game. I mean what's the point in having things like that, it clearly won't make you a better gamer nor would it provide you any benefit while playing the video game. It is really cool, satisfying and rewarding to have the latest technology but face the facts we don't always need the latest technology. It's really intimidating to buy the latest technology but most people don't need it. Trust me, I'm also intimidated to keep up with the latest technology but the truth is that you don't always actually need them. But I still respect your opinion and I understand where you're coming from.
The more fps you get the faster you can react to what's going on, and the high res it is the more you can see the detail and enjoy it. I don't like playing on low res and fps.
If you can I'd go 1440p 240hz. But if not 1440p 144hz is better for gaming. Smoother and can react much sooner. But 4k is sharper and if you only play tomb raider. Jedi fallen order type games and some racing ones it's better to have a higher res monitor.
@@xpodx Is there significant difference between 91ppi and 108 ppi from 60cm distance. I have option for only either 2k 27 or 2k 32 inch monitor. Thanks
@@jojugeorge3215 it wouldn't be nice and complete shit. But would be a little noticeable from closer up. So up to you. I think a 4k 28" would be perfect for you.
@Gustaf well the 24" 1080p has 91 ppi and the 27" 1440p has 108 ppi, so sharpness wasn't a huge difference, but you gained a few more inches and tiny bit more clarity
![Gunna - HIM ALL ALONG [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HiCxoDeo0hc/mqdefault.jpg)
5k has better quality when zoomed
Yes sir, it's 1.78x more detailed, so it's a good amount sharper, even from a normal viewing distance.
i have a projector and i will never know how cinemas got away with using 2K DCI on huge screens back in the early days of digital cinema, its 2048 x 1080. The pixels would have been massive. I get to about 135 inch and the image suffers so badly
I mean They're not sharp xD specially up close looks really blurry.
Thanks!
You're welcome!
I am thinking to buy a 34 inch ultrawide 1440p (3440*1440). I am currently using 1080p 21.5 inch. So will it be look like more sharpen than the 21.5 1080p or same.or less
Oh nice, well the 1080p is at 102 ppi, while the 3440x1440p is at 109, so your gaining a tiny pinch of detail while gaining a massive amount of screen space and size.
@@xpodx thanks a lot. I am planning to buy the mi 34 one. As it is available at 458 usd in our country. The gigabyte 32inch model is also available. Can you suggest one?
@@nasifahmed9728 is the 32" also the same res and hz?
Cuz that'll be a little higher ppi, sharper at only 2 inches smaller. Might be a better idea.
I'm between a 24 inch 1080p IPS and a 27 inch 2K VA, I'm going to consume media, do research and usually play games on it, which one do you recommend?
Higher res. 1440p. Ips is more colorful and better, but 1440p is sharper
@@xpodx colors are the same for the two I'm looking at actually 'cept VA has better contrast but I'm really scared of the ghosting and smearing VA will have. Still it seems very much like the better option, thanks a ton!
No, ips will pop more will be more appealing to look at, but 1080p will be more blurry, I'd get the 1440p cuz it's sharper and still not to bad colors wise. Cheers
I'm currently using 1080P on 27inch I'm struggling to decide whether to buy another 27inch but with 1440P (can make duo monitor setup) or upgrade to 32inch with 1440P. Kindly share your thought
1440p 27 is gonna be sharper and imo a better size to game on.
@Mateusz Graczyk you need good eyes period. But having 1440p 27, 4k 28, and 5k 28, I can tell you 1440p is to low for me, not as sharp, and 4k 28 100% scaling Is just fine, 5k 27" is where you have to lean way closer to read small text, but worth it.
pixel density on 32inch 1440p is the same as 1080p on 24inch display
Correct. (I looked it up to see ha)
I've done some comparing and currently I am using an ultrawide 30 inch 2560 X1080 monitor that has a 92.6 ppi so the difference in sharpness appears minimal to me over say a 27 inch 2560 x 1440 monitor that has 109 ppi. Also the added real-estate of the ultrawide makes up for the added real-estate you get with the 1440 monitor. also my monitor has a 200 hz refresh rate so gaming is pretty smooth. I had used a regular wide monitor but missed the advantages of the ultrawide so went back to it and am staying. The MSI monitor I got was only $269 on amazon. I sit about 32-34 inches from my monitor and I think a 34 inch would be too big for the slight increase in clarity for the increase in cost. Also I get decent FPS with my rtx 3060ti GPU which would drop with a 1440 monitor unless I shell out mega bucks for a new gpu.
I see, well it's true that with the 1440p you'd see only a slight clarity improvement, the total amount of pixels would be 921,600 more then the 1080p ultrawide. Which is a solid amount better. It's up to you on how you wanna spend your money and the setup you're trying to achieve, my advice would be to save for a 4k 144hz 28" or so, and sell your 2560x1080p monitor to make up some of the cost if you're looking for a sharper monitor. Up to you though. Cheers.
@@xpodx Yeah to get decent fps on a 4k you need a very expensive video card and I don't play enough games to justify the cost. I am quite satisfied with my set up as is but thanks anyways.
@@unclecreepy4324 makes sense. Sounds good 👍
My TV PPI= 52. Should i buy a monitor with better resolution?
You'd definitely see a visual improvement. Are you on pc?
You could get a 1080p 144hz 24" ips panel, or if you wanted to spend more money, 1440p 144hz/165hz 27" ips
please provide me your opinion. I.m considering 34inch ultrawide (109ppi) vs 40inch ultrawide (93ppi). Both 1440p and ips panel. Should I go with 40 inch for more space and less ppi or go with 34 inch but higher ppi? will the quality of the 40 inch monitor affected much due to the lower ppi? Thank you.
It's really close tbh... if you stick your head by your monitor side by side you'd see a slight difference, but it would be small, I would suggest whatever your budget Is and desk size, both are excellent choices.
@@xpodx thank u, im leaning more towards the 40 inch as currently i am using 29 inch 1080p ultrawide (95ppi). I guess the quality of the 40 inch will be quite similar to what i am using now.
And is that sharp enough for you?
@@xpodx for my kind of work it looks fine. As i am not doing much of creative and designing work. However, i dont have anything to compare to. Hahahha
@@mohdhafiidzjaafar9336 ha well, sharper is nicer, but if you want a bigger ultrawide you might be more limited, unless you wanna get a even higher resolution ultrawide and more money
Would you suggest going for 32 inch 1440p display?
Um.. thats pretty big for a 1440p to be closer up to your eyes.. 32" 4k is alright but can still see the pixels from 10" away or so. 27" Is nice for 1440p
@@xpodx Unfortunately I can't cancel the order. My desk is 140cm x 70cm (55inx27in), so I think there is enough space between me and the monitor. Would the PPI difference still be a dealbreaker? I'm upgrading from a 17inch 1080p laptop.
@@xpodx Got the monitor and decided to test it out. I have to say it's not bad at all! Really surprised by how crisp everything looks! Will give it a week and see if anything changes.
@@ridhwan3710 1440p 27? Or 32? How'd you get it so fast?
@@xpodx I got the 32in. And it was same day delivery!
I'm planning to buy a 1080p 27" monitor which is a VA penal. Should I go for a 27" monitor? If I buy that , will I face any problem?
Oh nice!
27" at 1080p is a little big for a monitor, because the pixels are gonna be pretty noticeable, but if that's your budget, you'll be okay.
@@xpodx thanks for the response!❤️
@@raiyannewaz00 no problem!
@@xpodx Yes im worries about the pixels, i dont want to be irritated by it.
Im planning to purchase Gigabyte G27F 27'' at 1080p (IPS Panel). Do you think the pixels for this monitor or any 27 inch with 1080p, IPS panel will be it noticeable too??
@@gundamepyon5330 i think yes.. but if your 2ft away or more maybe it won't be as bad. I don't have a 27" 1080p but I'm planning on getting a 280hz 1080p 27" sometime soon.
Should I get a 24" 1080p monitor or a 27" 1080p monitor
Up to you. The 27" will be bigger , but 24" will be a little sharper (at the same resolution)
TBH I can barely see any difference in an normal picture. You would start to see the difference when you zoom in the picture. The difference becomes visible when zoomed in the picture. I don't think most people would need that much detail in their pictures. It would be really cool to have resolution beyond than 4k but TBH you don't need them unless you're a professional video editor, video creator, etc.
Just shows you what the screens are capable of. Low res can't show you more detail cuz much less pixels.
When it was just the picture in person was very noticeable, a RUclips video is compressed and doesn't look as good you know, believe me tho, its a nice improve and quality improvement. You could buy a used 4k monitor for 180 bucks on eBay and enjoy and see for yourself. Not as nice and sharp as 5k but still nice res
@@xpodx I understand what you mean. Definitely having the most latest technology would always be cool and satisfying but the reality is that most people actually don't need them and can easily make use of a technology which might not be the latest. And the thing is that you don't care about FPS, resolution,etc while playing a video game, watching a video,etc unless the FPS, resolution,etc are really shitty. But I do respect your opinion and I understand where you're coming from.
I care about fps my dude. I have a 1440p 144hz for competitive gaming. And 5k 60 for racing games and first person type games
@@xpodx I don't think that most people need that much resolution,fps,etc. Even in your case I don't you are focused on resolution,FPS, etc while playing a video game unless it's really shitty FPS, resolution, etc. I also play video games but I don't care about FPS, resolution, etc as long as I can clearly see the video game. I mean what's the point in having things like that, it clearly won't make you a better gamer nor would it provide you any benefit while playing the video game. It is really cool, satisfying and rewarding to have the latest technology but face the facts we don't always need the latest technology. It's really intimidating to buy the latest technology but most people don't need it. Trust me, I'm also intimidated to keep up with the latest technology but the truth is that you don't always actually need them. But I still respect your opinion and I understand where you're coming from.
The more fps you get the faster you can react to what's going on, and the high res it is the more you can see the detail and enjoy it. I don't like playing on low res and fps.
For 27 inch monitor 1440p /144 or 4k/60 ? I have one RTX 3080 Ti
If you can I'd go 1440p 240hz. But if not 1440p 144hz is better for gaming. Smoother and can react much sooner. But 4k is sharper and if you only play tomb raider. Jedi fallen order type games and some racing ones it's better to have a higher res monitor.
@@xpodx Well i like Single and Multiplayer
I'd get a 1440p 144hz then
Get a 43inch 4k oled screen. Or tv like lg c3 43inch
I don't want a bigger display for my main gaming setup. It's ppi is lower. I want a 28" 8k 144hz
@@xpodx 100ppi at 80+ cm away is enough. 8k 144hz needs several gpus to get over 20fps
@kwazar6725 depends on the game, I can play many games at 8k with my 4090 and get over 60. But yea 2x.5090 would be amazing
What are the screen sizes of the monitors??
24, 27, 28, & 27"
@@xpodx is there much difference between 2k 27 inch and 2k 32 inch monitor for content creation purposes.
Little less sharp, but if you sit back a little more the 32" might be fine. I think 27" is a nice size though. What about a used 4k 28"?
@@xpodx Is there significant difference between 91ppi and 108 ppi from 60cm distance. I have option for only either 2k 27 or 2k 32 inch monitor. Thanks
@@jojugeorge3215 it wouldn't be nice and complete shit. But would be a little noticeable from closer up. So up to you. I think a 4k 28" would be perfect for you.
i had a 1440p monitor and i didn't notice a difference
What size?
@@xpodx 1080p at 24 and 27inch, and 1440p at 27inch
@Gustaf well the 24" 1080p has 91 ppi and the 27" 1440p has 108 ppi, so sharpness wasn't a huge difference, but you gained a few more inches and tiny bit more clarity
Yoo thx
Np mint
Glad you liked it