Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Brunch | PH, US mutual defense treaty is not a ‘one-way street’
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июн 2024
- #Brunch | Political Science professor Aries Arugay emphasized that invoking the mutual defense treaty between the Philippines and the United States requires agreement from both nations.
Follow us for the latest news and public service information!
One PH
Facebook: / onephoncignal
TikTok: / oneph_cignal
One News
Facebook: / onenewsph
Instagram: / 1newsph
TikTok: / onenewsph
Subscribe to the One PH channel and click the bell icon: / @onephoncignal
#News #Balita #LiveNewsTodayPhilippinesOnePH
PBBM in all dignity has spoken bravely and has displayed patriotism with a positive spirit to tell China 'how to behave' ! Kudos to PBBM having inspired majority of the Filipinos and humiliated China and all the makapilis favoring China pathetically and blindly.
THE BIG QUESTION IS HINDI BA TAYO PWEDENG MABUHAY NG WALANG CHINA SA PILIPINAS. produkto at negosyo ng China pinapalago ng pilipinas.
pampalakas lang ng loob iyon ni pbbm. pero mahirap sandigan ang mutual defense treaty hindi magpapakamatay ang amerika para sa filipino.
Eh bakit pinalawak ng US ang EDCA sites nila dito sa Pilipinas. Sa palagay mo kung pasukin tayo ng China papayag na lang ang US at pababayaang sirain ang mga EDCA sites ,may mga war equipment ang US sa mga EDCA sites. Tandaan kahit ayaw natin ng giyera hindi papayag ang US na maisara ng China ang WPS. He who control the sea control the world. At sa oras na mawala ang Pilipinas lalong mahihirapan ang US na makalapit sa China yung 7th Fleet nila doon na lang sa Pacific Ocean.
pH needs to demand MDT
Invoking MDT doesn't mean US jump into War against china it will bring to US Congress and discuss to united nation security Council meaning delay while Filipino already dying
Youre just too underestimate the fightinh spirit of filipunos
Come on Filipinos! What were you all doing in 1995 when China started claiming our islands!?
If we filipnos did not do anything at that time, and we are just acting now...what is the issue? We only acted late because dutertes stupidity, but it does not mean we are renouncing our right, it did not mean that chinas clai is correct.
@@juanpedrosantiago The issue back then was our leaders were busy politicking not realizing China has been building concrete airstrip. I've seen many soldiers getting mentally/demented being assigned in those isolated islands. Since our former leaders didnt prioritize our coastal territories, the supply for those soldiers were always delayed. And whats the difference? D answer is from this saying: "Daig ng taong maagap ang taong masipag"
@@GG-ve1hv true. But it does not erode or make our right weaker. The rule is there to protect our right from the very beginning.
@@juanpedrosantiago I agree with you since we have legal & historical documents but China is getting more aggressive as compared before, that our former leaders overlooked and only asserted our rights in Hague that is kinda late... China's confident to ruin our country, if not rule, bec. we've been divided...
It's not about Philippines
un nga Ang malaking tanong...Ewan..mahirap umasa...
ILANG BESES na ba ni LIGTAS SA GERA Ng u.s Ang PINAS.
Philippines needs to make preparations and install permanent installations in ayungin and second thomas shoal. No need to invoke the mutual defense treaty.
We should have the agency to enforce our sovereign will on what is supposedly our exclusive economic zone.
Hindi makikipatayan ang US para sa mga Pinoy..
Sino may sabi sa iyo, ang South China Sea ay napakahalaga para sa US at sa maraming bansa, sa oras na makuha ng China ang buong WPS isasara ng China yan na mahihirapan ang US dahil lalawak ang A2 D2 ng China and that is a big factor sa deterrent ng China na hindi papayagan ng America.
@@iwannabefree9270Kasalanan mo yan nagpaniwala ka sa NARATIVE ng US na isasara ng China ang SOUTH CHINA SEA. HAHAHA Hindi ganon ka tanga ang China para gawin yan kasi kung gagawain nila yan ay sila din mismo ang maaapektohan ng pagsasara ng shipping route n ayan. China ang may pinakamalaking volume ng trade ang dumadaan dyan. Manapa US ang may kakayahang magsara ng mga shipping route sa mundo. binibintang ng US ang matagal na nilang gawain sa China. ISIP muna bago magpapaniwala sa US.
oo pero mamatay tau nakanganga kung okay lg kawawain ng china. kaya mas maigeng united lahat sa oras na inaapi na ang pinas
@@mystville3752 kaya tayo nakakawawa at lumalala ang ensyon dahil sa kakadikit at sa pakikialam ng US.
Hindi nyo alam na kapag nakuha ng China ang buong China Sea at Taiwan strait. US can not afford to loose Taiwan and the Philippines,
US cannot afford to lose its HEGEMONY in ASIA that is why it is using TAIWAN and PHILIPPINES. kahit magaya sa UKRAINE ang Pinas at Taiwan WALANG PAKIALAM si US. Alam yan ng mga ASEAN NEIGHBORS natin, TANGA lang itong si BBM at nagpapagamit.
Why does the good professor would assume on when to invoke the MDT. MDT may be invoke by referring to the MDT itself, which I believe many times read over and over again even by Pres. iden.
Nowadays, docility is no longer a virtue. When a predator senses vulnerability, it goes for the jugular
ang MDT ay pinirmahan noong 1951. Ang claim ng Pilipinas sa Kalayaan Griup of Islands ay mga 1978 lang under Marcos Sr. May malaking difference kung Teritoryal reference ang pagbabasihan. At wala pang UNCLOS noon kasi ang UNCLOS ay noong 1982 lang. kaya malaking problema yan.
Mas nagmumukha tayo talunan sa pananaw ng ibang bansa ngayon yan nga lang sa water canon incident kapwa Pinoy nga tumatawa how much more yun ibang lahi
Philippines not same league
USA n Philippine treaty 😂 modern war is not haw many countries you can groups n sign treaty is how many missile n fire power country have can USA n Philippine stop all missile n rocket fire from China to your island
In words
Not indeed
Being naive
Good feeling
Wag maniwala sa us iiwan tayo sa ere nyan
gera muna bago mo sabihin yan
Wag kalimutan ang edca site iba din ang mdt
agree ugali n ng US mangiwan sa gitna ng gera or labanan.
Iba kase ang kaso natin kumpara sa ibang bansa na pumalag sa china like vietnam.sila kase walang mdt kahit kanino.kaya pag nagkapalagan.walang mahihilang ibang super power.unlike satin na pag pumalag tayo sa china.my makakaladkad sa away.yun nga yung us.ibang usapan kase pag parehong super power naglaban.large scale at damay damay lahat.kaya mahirap ang sitwasyon natin kumpara sa ibang bansa like indonesia n kayang magpasabog ng barko ng china
UNG guest masyado nmn minamaliit UNG pilipinas😅 masyadong maliit tingin SA pilipinas parang wala tlga tong magagawa SA china
pero pag hinayana ng u.s namakuha Tau ng tsina,under na ng tsina Ang u.s...or mauungusan n nga tsina Ang u.s...ng malau...un naman Ang ayaw mangyayari ni uncle Sam....
paulit ulit n ng usa singot yn paulitulit dn tinatanong yn
Economic sanction
Amoy pro china
Ironeclad
Palpak ung guest nyo.
Bka ikaw ang palpak
@@eympitts2040 marunong ka lang maganalisa ay alam mo ang GEOPOLITICS sa Mundo ay masasabi talagang PALPAK ung nakausap nila. Masyadong safe ang sagot.
@@eympitts2040 hindi palpak ang edca sites patago kung ano anong missile nakalagay walang nag vvlog .
Hello, it's South China Sea since ancient times and not Philippines sea
Define ancient