Brien Foerster - Foramen Magnum of Paracas Skulls
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 янв 2024
- Brien Foerster claims the foramen magnum of the "original elongated skulls" of Peru are in the wrong spot for them to be human. I used the replica (accurate to the millimeter) of the skull he tells you to get in his book. Turns out that not only is Brien wrong, he uses camera tricks to fool his audience to make this claim. Not cool, Brien, not cool!
Youre doing great work. Thank you for debunking obvious lies
Thank you sir for all the wonderful work that you are doing!!! I hope this channel grows and grows and grows!!!
Much appreciated
Science continually tries to prove itself wrong, and religion continually tries to prove itself right.
😂😂😂😂 tf u don't understand anything at all
@jen4ra-vs5og Well, one thing is for sure...you won't understand anything if you use the bible as your text.
@@jimmunro2136 understand it's a mistake talking sense to religious
@@jen4ra-vs5ogif your idealogy relies on apologia you're already doing something wrong.
@@paulisfat8077 yes that's wrong is talking sense to a brainwashed
Snope: because it's ELONGATED
As soon as I saw the picture of the elongated skull from below, I could tell that it was tilted a lot. I would guess that people who aren’t as familiar with the skull would be fooled by this though, it’s sad that people like Brian Foerester or Graham Hancock try to mislead people who are genuinely interested in science and history. I think it’s the responsibility of the programs that put these people’s ideas out to properly inform people that this is misinformation.
“Camera Trick.” I knew it right away lol!
Is Brian Foester misleading his audience? Not cool
Also not surprising.
They have found infants born with elongated skulls, and the spinal hole is oval as opposed to human which is round, id like you to have a good sit down with brian so you can be completly sure and i will be ready to apologize
Who has found such skulls? Where are said skulls?
@@Vision_2 like i said i will apologize to anyone if they find fake evidence, Brien Foerster has been in Peru for 12 years, please watch some of his videos, he doesnt sound like a nut case
@@morgan4212 I have seen his videos and his unsupported claims. Where is his evidence?
@@Vision_2 i think there is supported claims of dna and blood types how do you explain the skulls that have larger orbitol holes and larger jaws no canines
Im just saying theres a possibility that this is some "Homo" offshoot its not an alien
Wow, you do a great job at misrepresenting briens arguments, he clearly said in his video that the case of the foramen magnum being further back was to make sure that the head is centred, because the skull is elongated, so the foramen magnum is genuinely further back on this skull than a normal skull and his point still stands.
You are attacking a strawman and pretending to be smart, try again.
It's literally in exactly the normal spot. See the ending of this clip when I show it side by side with a normal skull and measure from the roof of the mouth backwards.
Brien is lying to you and is using a camera trick to do so.
@@StatedCasually yes but you are using your faulty system of analysing a single faulty sample.
if you looked at briens skull which he used in his example and measure that he is proven innocent, when comparing the carotid canal to the foramen magnum we can see that in a normal skull (and the elongated skull you used) the foramen magnum opening starts just after where the carotid canal ends, however in briens sample we see that the foramen magnum is much further back than the cartotid canal, proving his theory.
Also, if you actually watched his video with that sample you would see that he says that the foramen magnum is further back to balance the head and he shows the same angle you show, his actual point with showing that angle is that the head immediately slopes upwards when a normal head doesn't.
You can't accuse brien of lying when you didn't even measure his sample and instead used your own, that is strawmanning.
if you actually understood this subject and properly studied briens position before trying to debunk him you would already know that your sample is basically worthless.
If you would like i can explain it to you properly.
Every accusation is an admission it would seem 😂😂😂
@@bucko3353 imagine typing all that just to be wrong 🤡🤡
In the other guys picture, bother sets of teeth are st the same angle... it doesn't seem to be a camera trick...
When you hold it at an angle, it's obvious.
This seems disingenuous. 😳
Do you expect less from a grifter?