I listened to this while sleeping. You carried me on your shoulders. Deep down. You bounced down the stairs. You gave me personal knowledge from the Buddha. Many demons came. But you laughed them off. Or growled at them. I was safe in your arms. On your shoulders. You carried me like a mother carries a child. But like a man. And every step of the way I got to learn higher truths. It was a most beautiful journey. Pure Bodhicitta.
Such a great and profound teaching .So clear ,so lucid explanation .Thank you So much you Eminence Venerable Khenpo Sherab Sangpo Rinpoche ..May you live eons and continue turning the wheels of Dharma for samsaric beings like us..Thank you..
Please accept my salutations respected sir. You are giving a excellent lessons on Buddhism and serving suffering mankind. Please post more such videos on regular basis.
Fine talk. While everyone would agree (at least intellectually) that everything has a cause and effect, it's not at all obvious why karma must have a moral dimension. Ethics, morality (many would argue) is a social construct that facilitates survival, harmony, cooperation, and restrains various impulses. Yes, ethics does contribute to human happiness, and within the human realm, we often see causal connections that have a moral dimension. But (many would say) it's an unwarranted extension to posit that the universe as a whole has this moral dimension. What works in the human realm may be completely irrelevant to what happens in the aftermath of the body's death. Bear in mind that I'm not arguing that this is so, but only pointing out the doubt that may arise in many people's minds. Let's face it: the universe and its laws, by and large, seems AMORAL, having nothing whatsoever to do with kindness or compassion. Moreover, the fact that animals, say, kill other animals (without remorse or subsequent purification), while it may seem to go contrary to the dharma, in some ways shows order and equilibrium. Killing, as unpleasant as it sounds, contributes to a certain equilibrium that the planet very much needs. If certain animals stopped killing others, we'd be in much more trouble than we already are. Once again, how the planet (not just the animals) operates seems to go contrary to ethics; it's rather impersonal, it seems to me.
![The Heart Sutra [1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eHg51MXKv3Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Heart Sutra [1]](/img/tr.png)
![The Heart of Tibetan Buddhism-Advice for Life, Death, and Enlightenment [3]](/img/1.gif)
difficult topic, excellent teaching!
The Bodhicitta with this one was very strong.
Extremely powerful.
Thank you.
I listened to this while sleeping.
You carried me on your shoulders. Deep down. You bounced down the stairs.
You gave me personal knowledge from the Buddha.
Many demons came. But you laughed them off. Or growled at them.
I was safe in your arms. On your shoulders.
You carried me like a mother carries a child. But like a man.
And every step of the way I got to learn higher truths.
It was a most beautiful journey.
Pure Bodhicitta.
Where I can find audio for this
This is a great teaching for me and helped me so much. Thank you.
Form is emptiness, and emptiness is form.
This is why the Heart Sutra is so powerful.
Such a great and profound teaching .So clear ,so lucid explanation .Thank you So much you Eminence Venerable Khenpo Sherab Sangpo Rinpoche ..May you live eons and continue turning the wheels of Dharma for samsaric beings like us..Thank you..
Please accept my salutations respected sir. You are giving a excellent lessons on Buddhism and serving suffering mankind. Please post more such videos on regular basis.
Sunyata is an experience, not an explanation
Sounds like splaining
Khenpo la - Who is that Lama in the middle...? and also the lama with glasses. I can see Khenpo Petse, Pema tsewang la... Thanks la.. respect.
🙏🙏🙏
Fine talk. While everyone would agree (at least intellectually) that everything has a cause and effect, it's not at all obvious why karma must have a moral dimension. Ethics, morality (many would argue) is a social construct that facilitates survival, harmony, cooperation, and restrains various impulses. Yes, ethics does contribute to human happiness, and within the human realm, we often see causal connections that have a moral dimension. But (many would say) it's an unwarranted extension to posit that the universe as a whole has this moral dimension. What works in the human realm may be completely irrelevant to what happens in the aftermath of the body's death. Bear in mind that I'm not arguing that this is so, but only pointing out the doubt that may arise in many people's minds. Let's face it: the universe and its laws, by and large, seems AMORAL, having nothing whatsoever to do with kindness or compassion. Moreover, the fact that animals, say, kill other animals (without remorse or subsequent purification), while it may seem to go contrary to the dharma, in some ways shows order and equilibrium. Killing, as unpleasant as it sounds, contributes to a certain equilibrium that the planet very much needs. If certain animals stopped killing others, we'd be in much more trouble than we already are. Once again, how the planet (not just the animals) operates seems to go contrary to ethics; it's rather impersonal, it seems to me.
Shadu Shadu Shadu