Will Peru’s Chinese-built megaport be a ‘win-win’?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 дек 2024

Комментарии • 732

  • @mariogutierrezc
    @mariogutierrezc Месяц назад +458

    99.99% of population in the Chancay agree with the new port. You had to walk a lot searching for the 0.01% for your interview. Today the whole town gathered at the main square being part of the inauguration of the Port.

    • @MarioCastro-c3z
      @MarioCastro-c3z Месяц назад +84

      That woman is the only one who has appeared for years in every report looking for someone to speak badly of the port. Just check it. It´s now a business for her.

    • @xx133
      @xx133 Месяц назад +6

      This will not benefit workers, only corps. The port itself isn't a bad thing.

    • @bin.s.s.
      @bin.s.s. Месяц назад +5

      Truth & well said.

    • @yasimen-p2t
      @yasimen-p2t Месяц назад +28

      She was paid to say that 😂

    • @yasimen-p2t
      @yasimen-p2t Месяц назад +24

      ​@@xx133
      It will increase the employment rates, there'll be lots of new jobs

  • @ykhan187
    @ykhan187 Месяц назад +207

    Do you want to remain poor forever as the US want you to be?

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 Месяц назад +11

      No

    • @liveculture4life
      @liveculture4life Месяц назад

      That’s true, that’s why they spend billions on wars and they don’t want to invest in South America, they just give a little something to Mexico so they can be happy with the bones.

    • @billiondollardong
      @billiondollardong Месяц назад

      Lol, yes the US has been keeping Central and South America poor, it's not their culture or highly corrupt politics, or their willingness to feed drug addiction in the US... This port and all other Central and South American investing will be another debt trap just like the Belt and Road Initiative failure and the failed Chinese investments in Africa. FACTS

    • @SK-lt1so
      @SK-lt1so Месяц назад

      Do 1.4 billion Chinese want freedom and human rights?
      Yes

    • @tonyrsch7994
      @tonyrsch7994 10 дней назад

      Peru always been china territory because the Incas come from Asia

  • @oki148
    @oki148 Месяц назад +337

    it's a WIN-WIN-LOSE deal,
    China:- Win
    Peru:- Win
    US:- Lose

    • @bilibili833
      @bilibili833 Месяц назад +2

      peru:-win
      china:-not sure win
      us:-not sure lose

    • @anyetitan8410
      @anyetitan8410 Месяц назад

      ​@@bilibili833you:USA.

    • @myintmaunmaun
      @myintmaunmaun Месяц назад +21

      @@bilibili833 If US is not sure, they shouldn't have been so negative

    • @jorgeramirez5
      @jorgeramirez5 Месяц назад +3

      I don’t think so! USA 🇺🇸 will never loose .

    • @rayjohn-dl3ec
      @rayjohn-dl3ec Месяц назад +4

      usa:- no win

  • @conti-vl6tx
    @conti-vl6tx Месяц назад +160

    US and Anglo-Saxon media will say this is a debt trap 😊

    • @myintmaunmaun
      @myintmaunmaun Месяц назад +26

      They already did, funny nobody listen to them any more

    • @OJ1992
      @OJ1992 Месяц назад +8

      ​@@myintmaunmaun There's not debt involved Peru has less debt than the USA

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      This is SCMP, chinese government owned media, who say the same.

    • @Chisobhaneko
      @Chisobhaneko Месяц назад +2

      😂😂😂

    • @ppaz1956
      @ppaz1956 Месяц назад

      Western media have been spreading Chancay port is Peru's Debt Trap

  • @Andromeda365
    @Andromeda365 Месяц назад +198

    No matter how you look at this port, it's an opportunity .

    • @BrowseAndLook
      @BrowseAndLook Месяц назад +15

      Exactly. It's a huge opportunity for Peru and South America to get rid of that "Banana Republic" status and have a direct link with China and Southeastern Asian countries.
      The US is angry because these South American countries have found a new way to develop and can finally get rid of the US control.

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 Месяц назад +2

      ❤Precisely.

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад +1

      ​@@BrowseAndLook pretty sure the one profiting the most for this port is US since it's going to cheap to import mineral from peru.

    • @daniel86250
      @daniel86250 Месяц назад

      Interesting the SCMP chooses western narrative to portray this Great geoeconomic infrastructure linking Peru Latam and china and not one word of perspective from the viewpoint of these regions.

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      @@daniel86250 it's not "western narrative", SCMP are mostly targeted towards upper middle class Chinese who want to know to invest or not and need every information including the risk that may come forward. Everyone blame "Western perspectives" Or "western propaganda" Simply miss who the information targeting to.

  • @pepequispemamani5325
    @pepequispemamani5325 Месяц назад +318

    I am Peruvian and haven't seen a report as biased as this before. Benefits -> more peruvian products will be sent to China , a new Industrial Park is being drafted from preliminary studies, technological support to police for having better resources, 6 thousands new direct or indirect jobs, new flights from China to Peru and viceversa, increasing amount of tourism from China to Peru, easy procedures to obtain visa , etc.

    • @Hkchinese888
      @Hkchinese888 Месяц назад +9

      Expectations are beautiful, the reality is cruel
      🤣🤣

    • @mariogutierrezc
      @mariogutierrezc Месяц назад +63

      @@Hkchinese888 not expectations, it is been signed and seen on National TV.

    • @BruceJ999
      @BruceJ999 Месяц назад +63

      ​@@Hkchinese888Time to make curry Indian bot

    • @Hkchinese888
      @Hkchinese888 Месяц назад +2

      @@mariogutierrezc The terminal is not free, also on what earth ppl will choose Peru as their tourist destination?
      Also what goods Peru is going to export to china which is 10000km away?

    • @Hkchinese888
      @Hkchinese888 Месяц назад +3

      @@BruceJ999
      I am a Chinese, abdul

  • @lesterzavaleta2885
    @lesterzavaleta2885 Месяц назад +51

    Soy de Chancay y estamos muy emocionados con la llegada de capitales extranjeros...Todo mi pueblo lo esta somos muy trabajadores...🎉

  • @shqip_sumejja
    @shqip_sumejja Месяц назад +147

    Why is this negative about China? This port will benefit both countries

    • @DragonNectar
      @DragonNectar Месяц назад

      As a Peruvian, I don't trust China. They are just buying power and leverage. A China based company bought the energy company Luz del Sur, which provides power to the whole country. The country is being sold piece by piece.

    • @gushui
      @gushui Месяц назад +18

      😂We are used to this kind of smear tactics.

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 Месяц назад +3

      ❤exactly

    • @merrick6484
      @merrick6484 Месяц назад +14

      It will benefit entired South America and Far East and South East Asian countries.
      Everyone can trade thru thies mega nw port, not just China.

    • @jzeng2022
      @jzeng2022 Месяц назад +9

      This not only benefits China and Peru, but also reduces the cargo voyage from China, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan in East Asia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam in Southeast Asia to South America by half, while Brazil, Chile, Ecuador and Argentina in South America can all use this high port, which will greatly promote the development of trade between South America and East Asia and Southeast Asian countries.

  • @irimeyilmaz956
    @irimeyilmaz956 Месяц назад +143

    3:40 And At What Cost?
    there it is.
    I wonder how much CIA paid for this one.

    • @ILIVEAGOODLIFE
      @ILIVEAGOODLIFE Месяц назад +14

      Its a $1.6 Billion 4:04 budget. There is plenty to go around

    • @badbad-cat
      @badbad-cat Месяц назад +12

      So true! _"but at what cost"_ template directly from the CIA office script 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 Месяц назад

      1.6B dollar budget. Many pennies to hand out.

    • @yanmak2363
      @yanmak2363 Месяц назад

      Hahaha thats what I was thinking

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      CIA can pay chinese government owned company now?

  • @sotong1113
    @sotong1113 Месяц назад +46

    From Singapore. A port of this size will help to ship more peru goods out to Asia.. hopefully to stopover in Singapore port to bring some of the nice stuffs from Peru for us as well for speedy time. Ignore the western media biasness

  • @silveriver9
    @silveriver9 Месяц назад +163

    “But at what cost” instant red flag that this is a propaganda video 😂

    • @alexejvornoskov6580
      @alexejvornoskov6580 Месяц назад +11

      Yeah, i had to laught as soon as i heard it.

    • @Rio-ke9he
      @Rio-ke9he Месяц назад

      To me is "indo pacific". Anti china people always use that word to describe asia pacific.

    • @taiwanstillisntacountry
      @taiwanstillisntacountry Месяц назад

      Mumbai-Dharavi numba-1

    • @qinxinghua
      @qinxinghua Месяц назад

      South China Morning Post has a long history working as a mouth piece for western countries.

    • @badbad-cat
      @badbad-cat Месяц назад +4

      I simply stopped watching video right after I heard that common CIA phrase 😹

  • @jimmylam9846
    @jimmylam9846 Месяц назад +33

    You can bet life in Chancay will be much better near future just have to wait for the rail link from Brazil to this port.

  • @ibcyt
    @ibcyt Месяц назад +63

    Spare SCMP, its doing very poorly and hence can only try to get some of those 1.6Bil US anti China sour grape fund to stay afloat.

    • @AstuteRealm
      @AstuteRealm Месяц назад +2

      China is the only country that allows multiple independent administrative regions within its territory. Time for China to change that

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      SCMP literally owned by chinese government.

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 Месяц назад +25

    Win-win unlike America which has only been supressing Peru for decades.

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 Месяц назад

      Ah yes, blame your own failures on America...

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Месяц назад +2

      @@loremasteringwion9930
      A senior adviser to U.S. President-elect Trump told the U.S. media on the 16th that Trump’s 60% tariff on China should also apply to all goods entering the United States through the Port of Chancay.

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 Месяц назад

      @@happymelon7129 Yes, it affect America, not Peru. These are for goods designated to enter the United States. Why should the US continue to outsource its manufacturing to a nation that wants to destroy the US.

  • @CarlosGutiérrez-k4k
    @CarlosGutiérrez-k4k Месяц назад +59

    Viva Perú y china saludos desde sur del Perú

  • @hylimm
    @hylimm Месяц назад +111

    Scmp trying to tarnish China? U r supposed to do journalism n not make propaganda!

    • @Benny-tx5qd
      @Benny-tx5qd Месяц назад +5

      scmp owned by Jack Ma

    • @yongzhu8454
      @yongzhu8454 Месяц назад

      This is a news channel that hates China, controlled by capitalist Jack Ma.

    • @qinxinghua
      @qinxinghua Месяц назад +11

      @@Benny-tx5qd Jack Ma is a vessel of Jewish interest group.

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 Месяц назад +2

      ❤Exactly

    • @Karen-v6z
      @Karen-v6z Месяц назад

      @@qinxinghua The two stupidest things Jack Ma has ever done are: one is to go to a dinner party in Israel to curry favor with multinational capital and win multinational capital for Alibaba; the other is to use Ant Financial to squeeze China's wealth and burden the Chinese with debt. He also founded West Lake University and established China's top financial party to confront the country.

  • @backpackpepelon3867
    @backpackpepelon3867 Месяц назад +79

    This news channel slowly turning into BBC tier of journalism.

    • @skwong6730
      @skwong6730 Месяц назад +16

      Not turning, it has always followed the Western media route

    • @Rio-ke9he
      @Rio-ke9he Месяц назад +2

      Always has been, scmp is filled anglos and Anglo wannabes

    • @badbad-cat
      @badbad-cat Месяц назад

      This Hong Kong based channel is definitely funded by the CIA

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      ​@@skwong6730SCMP now fully funded by chinese government. What are you guys yapping about?

    • @s._3560
      @s._3560 Месяц назад +2

      Their style is to lure you in first with some positive angle then turn negative towards the middle and end on a sour deprecating note...

  • @ramonching7772
    @ramonching7772 Месяц назад +18

    SCMP says .... It could take years before the port will become an economic success. ....
    Who cares? As long as my next container next month will arrive in 20 days instead of 45 days.
    SCMP should take a hike. It is too tiresome listening to your negative views.

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      SCMP is chinese government owned for rich chinese. It's mostly for investment news.

  • @CK-jo9im
    @CK-jo9im Месяц назад +52

    While Poland, Finland and Norway are receiving US military bases and making themselves marked nuclear targets.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @cedardrive4599
    @cedardrive4599 Месяц назад +16

    In five years’ time, the Chancay port in Peru will be the busiest port in the whole of the Western coast of North and South America. It will be even be busier than the US ports of Los Angeles and San Francisco.

  • @Felipe-n3j
    @Felipe-n3j Месяц назад +19

    Congratulation Peru…the port will hired many Peruvian manpower.

  • @YihTan
    @YihTan Месяц назад +123

    what uncertainty? sour grapes talk

    • @seangaun
      @seangaun Месяц назад

      This is SCMP anti China propaganda

    • @myintmaunmaun
      @myintmaunmaun Месяц назад

      SCMP Founded by brits, funded by yanks, Pretend to be China

    • @myintmaunmaun
      @myintmaunmaun Месяц назад

      Another 1.6 billion anti-China bill on fake "China" morning post

    • @s._3560
      @s._3560 Месяц назад

      They have toxic negative mindsets that's why their narrative is always to create a bad guy to blame for their failures and focus their anger, instead of being inspired to achieve.

  • @georgelee6857
    @georgelee6857 Месяц назад +27

    This is clear that it’s a big win for Peru that not only Peru can use the port for exporting but Peru’s surrounding countries can use it.

    • @junmouye1111
      @junmouye1111 Месяц назад +1

      You can collect your fare while you're sitting. This opportunity is great.

  • @xgguo3531
    @xgguo3531 Месяц назад +34

    I went through spanish comments of Peru related media today and most of comments are positive about the opening of Chancay port.

    • @yasimen-p2t
      @yasimen-p2t Месяц назад +12

      Yes, I'm Peruvian and most of us are happy about the new port. This video just found the 0.000001% that "disagrees" with the port. The people of the city are all excited about this.

    • @vikasprakashjoshi2090
      @vikasprakashjoshi2090 Месяц назад

      @@yasimen-p2t I am an indian and want to visit Machu Pichu. Can an Indian visit?

    • @yasimen-p2t
      @yasimen-p2t Месяц назад

      @@vikasprakashjoshi2090 absolutely yes!!!!!! Please visit Peru. We don't get too many indian tourists in Peru, it would be glad to have you in our country!

    • @vikasprakashjoshi2090
      @vikasprakashjoshi2090 Месяц назад

      @@yasimen-p2t Thanks for that invitation Yasimen. So, from where do the tourists to Peru largely come from from your observation? Is it other LATAM countries like Brazil or US, Germany? I want to visit Machu Pichhu in particular.

  • @Warhead-Vun
    @Warhead-Vun Месяц назад +64

    Uncertainty? What a joke!!

  • @sunnywu2464
    @sunnywu2464 Месяц назад +22

    America unhappy. Western media always describe such projects related to China as debt traps, which will lead to national bankruptcy. Debt trap in Laos, debt trap in Indonesia, debt trap in Africa, now in Latin America 😂.

  • @Chr0n
    @Chr0n Месяц назад +23

    SCMP is definitely getting some of that $1.6 billion.

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      From chinese government?

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 Месяц назад +2

      @@absentmindedshirokuma8539 Are you ignorant of the 1.6B dollar US gov budget to smear China?

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      @@silveriver9if china government stupd enough to let the media THEY OWN getting paid by USA, THEN THEY DESERVE IT. your argument only make china government look even dmber.

    • @yuki-b1y
      @yuki-b1y Месяц назад

      @@absentmindedshirokuma8539美国反华宣传

    • @ftu2021
      @ftu2021 Месяц назад

      @@absentmindedshirokuma8539 so you tell me that china has no free press but they are allowed to tarnish themselves. nice logic

  • @ohlkkk
    @ohlkkk Месяц назад +59

    SCMP = BBC+CNN 😎

    • @skwong6730
      @skwong6730 Месяц назад +5

      So true

    • @kada3374
      @kada3374 Месяц назад +5

      so true , from algerai and i see that

    • @lyooo
      @lyooo Месяц назад

      do you have recommendations for english-speaking news outlet that aren't biased against china? i really wanna keep up with stuff related from china, but scmp is getting annoying with the blatant propaganda..

    • @skwong6730
      @skwong6730 Месяц назад +2

      @@lyooo on the Web
      Global Times, China Academy, Xinhua News, China daily Global, Asia Times are just a few - as with all media read the news and use your own critical thinking

    • @lyooo
      @lyooo Месяц назад

      @@skwong6730 thanks a lot!

  • @freeworld88888
    @freeworld88888 Месяц назад +51

    Uncertainty lol. It is the solid evidence of certain aspects of investment.

  • @danysl2008
    @danysl2008 Месяц назад +40

    Without the port, the town is death and there is no potential at all. Now at least there is a chance. People just focus on empty glass and not what’s the potential…. They still need spoon feeding. Sigh…

  • @Mulindwa_Brian
    @Mulindwa_Brian Месяц назад +62

    Anything China. Negativity.
    Mainstream media what a joke

    • @AstuteRealm
      @AstuteRealm Месяц назад +7

      It's the only way the Hong Kong media outlet can profit from the $1.6B. It's all about money

    • @manishgrg639
      @manishgrg639 Месяц назад +3

      @@AstuteRealm still can't imagine scmp is owned by alibaba

    • @yongzhu8454
      @yongzhu8454 Месяц назад

      This is a news channel that hates China, controlled by capitalist Jack Ma.

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      ​@@manishgrg639alibaba is owned by chinese government now since jack ma get the boot. SCMP is owned by chinese government nowdays.

    • @ivybae9906
      @ivybae9906 Месяц назад

      "but at wat cost" instant red flag that this is nothing but a typical "see eye A" style anti Cina propganda

  • @xgguo3531
    @xgguo3531 Месяц назад +40

    "At what cost" , is it the BBC/CNN words about China related investment? Funny that SCMP learns to use the same words.

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      SCMP is owned by chinese government.

    • @s._3560
      @s._3560 Месяц назад +1

      Similar phrases : ''At what price'' or ''but will it last''...To quote from Winston Churchchill - 'The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty". It aptly sums up some groups of people in this world today...

  • @谷歌封我帐号没有言论
    @谷歌封我帐号没有言论 Месяц назад +25

    这些反华的媒体真酸,我们中国人的理想是天下大同,我们的主席说:人类命运共同体!南美洲人民总会说:离天堂太远,离美国太近!想摆脱美国的控制,首先是各国必须要团结,其次要发展经济!

    • @lederrick
      @lederrick Месяц назад

      I live in the US and trust me alot of us can see through the lies of our government and how they constantly demonize China because the US is failing while China is dominating global trade..All the US has ever done is exploit South America and has never once done anything positive to benefit the continent...This is a huge win for South America to start cooperating with China

  • @axelaaronccasanihuachua9073
    @axelaaronccasanihuachua9073 Месяц назад +10

    La eficiencia de Pareto menciona que no importa quién se beneficia más, lo que importa es que al menos una parte se beneficie. En este caso, ambas partes (Perú y China) se benefician. Incluso los 700 trabajadores se benefician de este proyecto. Si el puerto deja de existir el día de mañana, serían 700 personas desempleadas más.

  • @Felipe-n3j
    @Felipe-n3j Месяц назад +18

    It will be a win win for both nation.

  • @alexejvornoskov6580
    @alexejvornoskov6580 Месяц назад +23

    But at what cost? Well considering that its mostly China and an private mining company paying for it - at none. Especially since transport lenght reduction means cost reduction = products would cost less for people in Peru.

  • @chopinmack5418
    @chopinmack5418 Месяц назад +33

    At what cost ? A question from BBC ? ? ?

  • @colafish2152
    @colafish2152 Месяц назад +33

    The BBC style of phase using of "and at what cost" at 3:43 make me fell very comfortable.

    • @irimeyilmaz956
      @irimeyilmaz956 Месяц назад +11

      Glad I'm not the only one noticing.
      these phrases being repeated every time China is mentioned.

    • @badbad-cat
      @badbad-cat Месяц назад +5

      ​@@irimeyilmaz956 true. I'm also relieved that the general public started noticing and calling out these negative propaganda phrases

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 Месяц назад +4

      @@badbad-cat They aren’t even being subtle anymore. It’s blatant propaganda.

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      ​@@silveriver9scmp is owned by chinese government. If it's propaganda, then it's from them.

  • @04101983papya
    @04101983papya Месяц назад +36

    Well done china ❤from india

    • @darthvadeth6290
      @darthvadeth6290 Месяц назад +1

      As an Indian, it is very clear this is Chinese debt trap.
      But I appreciate you for writing this comment to draw positive attention for India, brother 🙏
      Jai Hind 🇮🇳

    • @ГонзалоЙовера
      @ГонзалоЙовера 22 дня назад

      @@darthvadeth6290propaganda de estados Unidos

  • @ramonching7772
    @ramonching7772 Месяц назад +11

    Yep. SCMP never fails to find something negative when in fact it is not even opened yet.

    • @bellyfilled887
      @bellyfilled887 Месяц назад

      SCMP is a goblin media in the first place.

  • @dxelson
    @dxelson Месяц назад +39

    always "but at what cost" xDD

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 Месяц назад +4

      😂

    • @ericlin1243
      @ericlin1243 Месяц назад +7

      Standard BBC language when describing China

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 Месяц назад +1

      Lifted directly from the anti-China script handed down by the cia

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      ​@@ericlin1243china government is same apparently, since scmp owned by chinese government.

    • @yenphung8809
      @yenphung8809 Месяц назад

      ​​@@absentmindedshirokuma8539own by Jack Ma, funded by CIA. Their main goal is the bad mouth anything China.

  • @myintmaunmaun
    @myintmaunmaun Месяц назад +12

    This MEGA PORT is Expected to be the BIGGEST in S. America in the Future. Has Location, infrastructure, logistic support, Funding, Expertise, Experience, etc that WILL make this PORT a SUCCESS. ❤

    • @uta-mx6vy
      @uta-mx6vy Месяц назад +2

      port that the same like greece port in europe, benefit everyone and become hub for the rest of near region

  • @Felipe-n3j
    @Felipe-n3j Месяц назад +12

    Only those countries don’t want Peru to prosper don’t want this port to be build….like India & USA.

    • @DailyBeatings
      @DailyBeatings Месяц назад +3

      India can reap similar benefits from this port, so why would they be against it?

    • @absentmindedshirokuma8539
      @absentmindedshirokuma8539 Месяц назад

      USA would glad with this port since now they can import precious metals much cheaper than from Argentina or Brazil.

  • @ulaikamor
    @ulaikamor Месяц назад +6

    Interesting how the report focuses only on production near the new port as potential export products from Peru. It fails to mention how the port will draw products from all over the region to be exported throught his port. As an example, Brazil will be one of main export countries that will be using this port and many of the imports coming through this port will go to the whole region.
    I would like to say that this report is badly researched, but I guess I know better...

  • @badhobz1
    @badhobz1 Месяц назад +9

    Given how unstable the potential trump admin will be for the next 4 years, this makes a lot of sense to pivot away from the us.

  • @biochemwang2421
    @biochemwang2421 Месяц назад +3

    4:10 If I were a fishman living at chancay, I will not worry about my old way of life affected by the mega port. On the contrary, I will be happy to give up fishing and perhaps open a supermarket or coffee shop to embrace my new life.

  • @teckmenglee8060
    @teckmenglee8060 Месяц назад +6

    Yes it will be. Both countries will do their part to make it win for all.

  • @lokesh303101
    @lokesh303101 Месяц назад +7

    Yes!
    South America 🌎 is the Strategic Region for China 🇨🇳 in the Asia-Pacific.
    BRI for South America 🌎 is a Blessing.

  • @proudwumao7280
    @proudwumao7280 Месяц назад +7

    Taïwan is not a country but China rebel province

    • @dyu999
      @dyu999 Месяц назад

      Taiwan is a country. ccp not elected

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 Месяц назад

      Then Britain, by the same logic, has a right to take back America

  • @0xLoKiETH
    @0xLoKiETH Месяц назад +4

    US: if Peru will become rich. Who will be my next low-end labor source😅

  • @hpw-ws6bj
    @hpw-ws6bj Месяц назад +6

    Scmp working hard to earn that $1.6 billion again.

  • @virgiliomateus4239
    @virgiliomateus4239 Месяц назад +5

    There are many videos biased against the same country that build things. That is an example. The fund of 1,6 billion to pay the postures like that explains a lot.

  • @a_viewerv2069
    @a_viewerv2069 Месяц назад +5

    Seeking win win , promote economy and trade , binging jobs, improved people’s living standard , well done and congrats to both Peru and China 👍👍

  • @whokilledmax
    @whokilledmax Месяц назад +2

    This is the kind of heavyweight project that can reshape the world, deeply touching the interests of the old world. Let's move forward bravely and firmly.

  • @DailyBeatings
    @DailyBeatings Месяц назад +6

    South Anti-China Morning Post never fails to disappoint...🤣

  • @renattocoronado3006
    @renattocoronado3006 Месяц назад +1

    Most of peruvians are seeing this collab between China and Peru positive for our nation.

  • @blose4793
    @blose4793 Месяц назад +6

    US will try to sabotage this port.

    • @rmapleaf
      @rmapleaf Месяц назад

      I guess they will use various means and channels to sabotage

  • @tedchyn
    @tedchyn Месяц назад +4

    It can be. Here is an example
    China's investment in Greece's Piraeus Port by COSCO Shipping totals €368.5 million for a 67% ownership stake (€280.5 million for 51% in 2016 and €88 million for an additional 16% in 2021). COSCO also committed €300 million for infrastructure upgrades.
    In terms of financial performance, the port reported €70 million in net profits for the first nine months of 2024, with total revenues of €174.9 million, reflecting its strong operational success. This investment has positioned Piraeus as a leading European port and a strategic node in China's Belt and Road Initiative​ It also created 1 to 2 thousand jobs locally.

  • @jasonong3906
    @jasonong3906 Месяц назад +5

    Well done China.. Peru

  • @harbhajandosanjh9856
    @harbhajandosanjh9856 Месяц назад +8

    Win win for Peru and win win for China, what’s wrong with it?

  • @juedaiyijiao
    @juedaiyijiao Месяц назад +3

    预测这个地理位置优越的港口周边会变成大城市,就像以前中国的深圳,从小渔村逐渐变成大城市。

  • @zachzhan
    @zachzhan Месяц назад +2

    Firstly, the land prices around the port will soon rise, and fishermen can open shops, making them the first to become wealthy

  • @OMGFrijoles
    @OMGFrijoles Месяц назад +4

    I want all you Peruvians to know, that megaport could have been an U.S. Base instead and you guys would have been so much happier like the Philippines.

  • @DanBurgaud
    @DanBurgaud Месяц назад +13

    it faces uncertainty because there are no cannons nor bombs

  • @JamieMorlok
    @JamieMorlok Месяц назад +3

    How unfortunate that SCMpost has interviewees who do not understand the principles of growth & development.
    One of the pillars of moving forward is infrastructure, which too has its long process to be established.

  • @jimmylam1486
    @jimmylam1486 Месяц назад +2

    A thousand things are needed in Peru and one thing alone can't jack up the country. But you got to start building these things and the port with its advantageous location is the key to start the ball rolling. Keep a positive attitude and build Peru. China was not built in a day.

  • @bellyfilled887
    @bellyfilled887 Месяц назад +1

    What sort of biased media is this? Strange, SCMP never condemn any of the 80 US military bases in Japan. SCMP never asked, "At what cost?" to the Japanese.

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 Месяц назад +4

    🤣Suddenly empireU$ felt Peru is lack of "Democracy" & "Human Rights" .
    When the U$A says they want to help you by building infrastructure in your country, they don't mean port, hospitals, roads, schools, etc.
    They mean military bases.
    --island country saying
    China sending investment to help building infrastructure in other countries.
    😆While empireU$ sending "democracy" to other countries using Tomahawk.

  • @pratikkatkar7885
    @pratikkatkar7885 Месяц назад +9

    Man of wisdom,clever,down to earth,low limelight, dynamic
    China became superpower in future

  • @malaysiaterdedah3934
    @malaysiaterdedah3934 Месяц назад +1

    We here in Malaysia will wait for more ships from Peru so we can enjoy Peru products. Cannot wait for you to transport some stuff here for us to try. Ignore the US, we are waiting for you. Maybe it's time for me to visit Peru for holiday. If China invest, 100% it will be safer for tourist.

  • @Periodic2table
    @Periodic2table Месяц назад +14

    美国控制的互联网就不要指望它们能说什么好话了

  • @aiasoliveira1486
    @aiasoliveira1486 Месяц назад +1

    Parabéns ao Peru pela conquista!!!🇧🇷 não se importem com as críticas dos invejosos.

  • @AnimeX100Pre-NZT
    @AnimeX100Pre-NZT Месяц назад +2

    From Chancay to Shanghai 👍🏻🇵🇪🇨🇳👍🏻

  • @ulooqulg
    @ulooqulg Месяц назад +1

    Like how Admiral Zheng He came and the maritime city state that he stopped. All flourished and become wealthy. There were no land grab, colonialism...

  • @YUZHIBIN-ri1gr
    @YUZHIBIN-ri1gr Месяц назад +1

    for sure, it will be win-win to boost Economy of Peru and Brazil

  • @rayjohn-dl3ec
    @rayjohn-dl3ec Месяц назад +3

    the chinese people who live at the middle kingdom are very smart. if your nation do business with china, you will get rich and live better. however, the chinese will live better and get much richer.

  • @francis5279
    @francis5279 Месяц назад +2

    4,000 trucks equals to 4,000 jobs (the drivers) not just 700 jobs.

    • @imanmanimanman7667
      @imanmanimanman7667 Месяц назад

      Kedai makan,bengkel dan stesen minyak berapa banyak pekerja yang boleh dapat di sana.

  • @lukawong8921
    @lukawong8921 Месяц назад +2

    Indo-Pacific? So it's not Asia anymore is the world getting smaller and divided Asia to many parts!

  • @customessaywriter4388
    @customessaywriter4388 Месяц назад +1

    "At what cost." And ladies and gentlemen there it is. The signature CIA/pentagon propaganda psyop line. 3:40

  • @mikezhang2351
    @mikezhang2351 Месяц назад +17

    😂😂😂bla bla so jealous😢😂😂

  • @bigeye4520
    @bigeye4520 Месяц назад +1

    The presence of the port will entice all other supporting infrastructures to be built throughout several decades. Both countries are eyeing long term benefits from the investment.

  • @jackoneill28
    @jackoneill28 Месяц назад +1

    This report just reminded me why I unsubscribed this channel.

  • @ProckerDark
    @ProckerDark Месяц назад +10

    But at what cost lol

  • @ordemeprogresso4
    @ordemeprogresso4 Месяц назад +1

    In fact, China is targeting Brazil and only built the port in Peru to facilitate trade with Brazil, mainly in agribusiness and raw materials, as Brazil had to use the Panama Canal to When Brazil arrives in China, it can now use Peru, as it will be a faster route. However, the US does not like it and will try to sanction Brazil,Because they know that China's real intention is to get closer to South America, especially Brazil.

    • @白山水
      @白山水 Месяц назад

      这就要看卢拉是否顶得住压力

  • @vrealzhou
    @vrealzhou Месяц назад +1

    China , Japan and SK wins because they can get cheap bronze ores from South America via this port. Peru wins for export ores with lower logistics costs, plus more jobs. Brazil wins because they can export their soy beans with lower logistics costs as well. US lose because their soy beans are less competitive in price compare with Brazil then.

  • @myintmaunmaun
    @myintmaunmaun Месяц назад +5

    Mutual cooperation and trade for a better future for their peoples. That is what the would needs. Yes, the US is quite unhappy about this.

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 Месяц назад +2

    😅Almost all the western media talk negative about Peru port.
    😎This mean Peru are doing the right thing.
    They(waste) are unhappy every0ne they have ex-p10ited has f0rmed a gr0up with0ut them.

  • @RiseOfAsia
    @RiseOfAsia Месяц назад

    If you think building new ports is bad, then just stop building anything at all. Even building houses will damage the environment.

  • @DukeLM
    @DukeLM Месяц назад +3

    Very excessive use of the word 'but'

  • @tyfsk
    @tyfsk Месяц назад +1

    3:41 "AT WHAT COST", I found it first!

  • @Buckzoo2030
    @Buckzoo2030 Месяц назад

    Definitely the port can boost FDI to prepare Peru for export adventure. Peru, however, needs a stable govt to do so.

  • @robertseaborne5758
    @robertseaborne5758 Месяц назад +1

    Well done China, thank you China for being the champion of modern socialism. Not only is China guaranteeing the survival of socialism, more importantly, the CPC/PRC is demonstrating to the world how a modernised socialism is an increasingly attractive model for other countries - especially developing countries, to consider adopting. During what could arguably be the most challenging period of human development, 'Socialism with Chinese characteristics' is proving to be a very adaptable and most progressive form of governance.

  • @charlielua
    @charlielua Месяц назад +1

    Why westener alway wish china project is a failure?

  • @kelvinyappie2797
    @kelvinyappie2797 Месяц назад

    A country that needs a port, gets port, yeah it's a benefit for Peru in long term run

  • @rabbitazteca23
    @rabbitazteca23 Месяц назад

    as an Asian I love Latino people and I can't wait to buy more South American special products!

  • @tonykhong
    @tonykhong Месяц назад +1

    SCMP in my experience projects a negative slant towards China.

  • @atky7032
    @atky7032 Месяц назад

    Well it’s a trade matter between the two countries. The Chinese know what they are benefitting, so are the Peru people. Some people may be unhappy, that’s normal.

  • @Observer168
    @Observer168 Месяц назад +2

    中国在戈壁沙漠推进大规模可再生能源项目,如太阳能、风能和沙电池,推动可持续能源发展。这些项目为长期稳定、能源安全和经济利益奠定了基础,不同于股市的短期刺激,这些投资不仅减少对石油进口的依赖,降低碳排放,还支持环境保护,并带来显著的经济回报。以下是这种战略重要的关键原因:
    1. 能源安全:减少对石油进口的依赖
    中国是全球最大的石油进口国,每年花费约1.5万亿美元用于石油进口。这种依赖国际能源市场的情况使中国暴露于价格波动和地缘政治风险中。仅2022年,中国在石油进口上的年支出就约为1.5万亿美元,给国家财政带来压力。在冲突或海上封锁时期,关键石油供应可能被轻易中断,威胁国家稳定。通过转向国内可再生能源,特别是在戈壁沙漠开发的太阳能和风能,中国可以显著减少这种依赖,确保稳定的能源供应。
    此外,沙电池技术通过加热沙子存储多余的能量,进一步增强了能源安全。美国国家可再生能源实验室(NREL)的研究人员正在开发这一新的热能存储技术,使用廉价的二氧化硅沙子作为介质。被称为ENDURING项目的这一系统,将风能或太阳能的多余电力用于超高温加热二氧化硅沙子。加热后的沙子储存在绝缘筒仓中,需要时可用来驱动涡轮发电。单个沙电池可存储高达26,000兆瓦时(MWh)的热能,系统可根据不同需求进行扩展。
    NREL的高级工程师马志文专注于长时热能存储、氢生产和太阳燃料过程的研究。他主导了基于颗粒的热存储系统的项目,并在能量存储的计算模型和实验研究方面做出了重要贡献。
    ENDURING项目的研究人员马志文强调,使用二氧化硅沙子作为热存储介质是去碳化的重要一步。沙子具有高热保持和传导能力,是一种长时储能的优秀解决方案。沙电池系统不仅高度可靠、成本低、环保,还能减少对煤和天然气等化石燃料的依赖。
    王兴超博士是国家可再生能源实验室(NREL)的一名研究人员,同时也是科罗拉多矿业学院的研究教员。他的研究专注于传热、热力学,以及传统和可再生能源系统。他在可再生能源的能量转换和存储方面有专长,尤其是在先进系统模型的开发上。
    2. 成本效益:太阳能和风能与煤炭和石油相比
    可再生能源成本逐渐低于传统化石燃料。在2022年,中国大规模太阳能发电的成本为每兆瓦时(MWh)20至30美元,而煤电成本为每MWh 60至70美元。在风力资源丰富的戈壁沙漠,风能成本也已低于石油发电。
    目前,中国每年在煤炭和石油进口上的花费约为2000亿美元,加重了对化石燃料的依赖,并使经济暴露于更大风险之中。向可再生能源转型将有助于缓解这一经济负担,特别是在全球能源市场日益不稳定的情况下。
    3. 宁夏的战略位置:可再生能源和人工智能的中心
    靠近戈壁沙漠的宁夏有望成为可再生能源和人工智能的战略中心。这里靠近丰富的太阳能和风能资源,并具备优越的高铁连接,是管理和分配可再生能源的理想位置。该地区的工业基础也支持能源生产和AI驱动的能源管理系统。
    宁夏-湖南特高压(UHV)输电线路的建设于2023年6月启动,该项目将可再生能源从中国西北的宁夏传输到中部的湖南省。这条长达1634公里的线路是中国国家计划的一部分,旨在利用沙漠地区的可再生资源实现清洁能源目标,通过将太阳能和风能从人烟稀少的地区输送到能源需求量大的城市中心,支持碳减排目标。项目完成后,预计每年可向湖南输送超过360亿千瓦时的电力 。
    宁夏-湖南特高压(UHV)输电线路预计将在2024年底全面投入运营。这条长达1634公里的特高压直流项目旨在将太阳能资源丰富的宁夏地区(尤其是腾格里和戈壁沙漠的太阳能发电项目)连接到湖南等用电需求大的省份。项目完成后,预计将传输约8吉瓦的电力,主要来源为太阳能和风能,并辅以少量的煤电容量。该基础设施是中国扩大可再生能源使用并减少工业化地区对煤炭依赖的战略关键部分 。
    中国是超高压直流(UHV DC)技术的世界领导者,该技术已成为其能源基础设施战略的核心。超高压直流技术能够以极低的能量损耗实现电力的远距离传输,非常适合将戈壁沙漠等偏远地区的可再生能源输送到需求旺盛的城市中心。
    中国在2000年代初期开始投资超高压技术,到2018年时已部署了全球规模最大的超高压电网。国家电网公司(SGCC)和南方电网公司(CSG)作为两大国有企业,在实施这一技术方面发挥了核心作用。目前,中国运营着超过30个超高压项目,包括直流(DC)和交流(AC)系统,传输总容量超过150吉瓦。这一网络使中国能够将西部人口稀少地区的可再生资源高效地输送到东部的工业中心 。
    其中最著名的超高压直流项目之一是2018年完工的昌吉至古泉输电线路。这条线路全长超过3000公里,将西北的新疆与东部的安徽连接起来,是世界上最长且最强大的超高压直流输电线路,输电能力高达12吉瓦。此类项目不仅支持中国的清洁能源转型、减少对煤炭的依赖,还为其他国家开发远距离输电系统提供了借鉴 。
    4. 经济增长、就业创造和GDP影响
    对戈壁沙漠可再生能源的投资将创造1000到1200万个工作岗位,特别是在建设、运营和维护领域。这些工作将为城市和农村地区提供高薪机会。
    就业创造:在未来十年,5万亿美元的投资将产生约2000万个直接和间接工作岗位,涵盖建设、运营、维护和研究。这些工作包括可再生能源系统安装、沙电池技术、电动汽车制造,以及运输、基础设施和供应链等支持行业。
    GDP增长:每年在可再生能源基础设施上的1万亿美元投资将显著提升中国的GDP。在五年内,这些投资预计将为GDP增加约5万亿美元,由可再生能源部门的产出推动。
    5. 环境可持续性:减少碳排放和沙尘暴
    在戈壁沙漠的大规模可再生能源开发将极大减少中国的碳排放,帮助实现2060年碳中和的目标。此外,风力发电机可作为屏障,减少北方地区沙尘暴的频率和强度,目前这些沙尘暴带来重大损失和健康成本。通过减少这些风暴,中国每年可节省数十亿美元的损失和医疗费用。
    6. 电动汽车:推动清洁能源需求
    随着电动汽车(EV)市场的增长,电力需求将上升。EV比汽油车更加环保且经济,因为它们依赖于清洁能源而非化石燃料。通过对可再生能源基础设施的规模化投资,中国可以满足这一增长的需求,减少对石油的依赖,进一步支持碳减排目标。
    7. 沙电池:更安全、更可靠、更具成本效益的储能解决方案
    沙电池通过热量存储能量,随后将其转化为电力或用于加热。一个典型的5000吨沙电池可存储约210万兆焦耳(MJ)的能量,非常适合在戈壁沙漠等沙资源丰富的地区进行长期存储。
    与熔盐电池的比较:
    • 安全性:沙电池比传统的锂电池或熔盐电池更安全,因为沙子不易燃且化学稳定。锂电池过热时可能起火,而沙电池即使在高温下也能保持稳定,降低了风险。
    • 可靠性:沙电池非常耐用,可以反复使用而不会退化,确保长期可靠性。相比之下,熔盐电池容易腐蚀,增加了维护成本。
    • 成本效益:沙子是一种丰富且廉价的资源,使沙电池的建造和维护成本比锂离子或熔盐电池低很多,适合大规模储能。
    8. 国家安全:电动汽车和应急系统
    使用可再生能源驱动的电动军用车辆和应急系统将带来战略优势。在石油短缺或海上封锁时,电动汽车可以确保军事和应急行动的持续性,提升国家安全。
    9. 空气制水系统:农业用的可再生能源
    可再生能源还可以为大气水发生器(AWG)供电,利用风能或太阳能从空气中凝结水分。这种清洁水可用于戈壁沙漠等干旱地区的灌溉,将荒地转变为肥沃的农业用地,提升粮食安全。
    10. 中国作为净能源出口国
    通过充分利用戈壁沙漠的可再生能源潜力,中国可以从全球最大的石油进口国转变为净能源出口国。太阳能和风电场生产的多余能源可以出售给邻国,增加收入,并增强中国作为清洁能源领导者的地缘政治影响力。
    11. 5万亿美元的能源生产投资
    通过5万亿美元的投资,中国可以在未来十年新增约4000吉瓦(GW)的太阳能和风能发电能力。每年将生产约8万太瓦时(TWh)的清洁电力。按每MWh 60美元的全球电价计算,这将每年带来约4800亿美元的能源出口收入。加上减少化石燃料进口的节省,这一投资将进一步提升中国的经济地位。
    12. 满足中国的全部能源需求
    5万亿美元的投资将使中国满足100%的能源需求。目前,中国的总能源消耗约为6000太瓦时。通过增加8万TWh的可再生能源,中国将完全摆脱对化石燃料的依赖。这样将每年节省约1.5万亿美元的石油进口费用,而剩余的可再生能源还可以出口,带来额外收入。

  • @mokulashi
    @mokulashi Месяц назад

    so whenever US builds navy ports in other countries , it doesnt affect local environments? come on SCM

  • @rodrigo_dmatoss
    @rodrigo_dmatoss 17 дней назад

    It is not China's responsibility to seize opportunities for local communities. It is the responsibility of local governments to seize these opportunities and use them to develop the region's social infrastructure. This is a historical problem in our region because there has always been this difficulty in the state allocating the necessary resources. The people here still do not understand and still do not sufficiently support state investment. Our development is greatly opposed by American media companies that manipulate our people into thinking that state investment is bad.