If all the ice covering Antarctica , Greenland, and in mountain glaciers around the world were to melt, sea level would rise about 70 meters (230 feet)
@@catboynestormakhno2694 But Obama obviously does not believe that ocean levels are rising. If he really believed that, he would have bought land in the mountains.
@@Pixlford Britton hill is the highest point in Florida at 345 feet and the highest point in Delaware is The Ebright Azimuth which has an elevation of 448 feet.
I am 64, lived on the gulf coast all my life. The coast line hasn't moved through the coming ice age (1970s), global warming (1990s) and now climate change. These "experts" seem to miss the mark in all directions. I'm sure it's all safe and effective tho😅.
They told us that by the year 2000 sea levels would rise at least three meters. My boat dock at the Jersey shore is still at the exact same level as it was in 1970.
Thank you! Been hearing this bs since 1972! All a bunch of crap! In the 80s it was the next ice age, then a hole in the ozone layer. All a bunch of crap from a bunch of 'chicken littles' and eco scam artists. What a grift!
Seriously people just Google sea level rise. There are places everywhere that is has been documented. Coastal forests dying because of salt water intrusion. Beach erosion especially in the northeast. I'm sure there are reasons certain are seeing the effects sooner than others but the overall trend is obvious. By the way this video is ridiculous as it's impossible for the sea level to rise that high even if all the ice everywhere melted. It would be bad though.
FLORIDA IS A NON SURVIVOR DEATH ZONE SECONDARY TO THE POLAR SHIFT…Anyone there now as of May 2024 has to make immediate relocation to the higher altitudes in order to survive… The New Madrid Fault ( The Great Quake) will occur by BEFORE The Polar Shift Event & will split North America in 2 and wreak havoc on the entire Continental U.S. infrastructure. Evacuation of coastal areas and the New Madrid area should’ve taken place ALREADY but if you haven’t relocated to a Safe Zone yet, you need to begin immediately NOW….Time is of the essence… God’s Speed 🙏🏻❤️
If you look closely you can see the flint hills in eastern Kansas becoming a small series of islands. I was wondering if they were significantly higher than the surrounding areas.
There is a lot i missed in school during the 80s ,but i do remember being told about the flooding from the melted glaciers that would happen in 20 years !,..... must not be 20 years yet!
they also failed to mention is that there isn't enough ice to melt to cause anywhere near this amount of flood. the absolute highest sea levels have only reached 20 ft higher than now.
Another intresting thing is the water appearing to cover inland baisons with no conection to the sea . At 1300 meters the great salt desert starts to flood yet the rim of the baison at red Rock pass is at least 700 feet higher
I don't think they actually accounted for real topographical realities. Just added sea level on an empty globe and it filled in the cracks automatically without regard to how the water would get there. 70m is the max possible sea level rise. A hundred meters if we're being excessively generous and accounting for things like increased rainfall. So, most people on earth if they can move as people do, are fine.
Fear porn doesn't have to reflect the actual fact of topography. It only has to create fear. So stop with the facts be afraid very afraid makes you easier to control.
I think they occupy close to 30 of the geological time. A couple of them lasted hundreds of millions of years. The Precambrian was probably the biggest and is often called Snow Ball Earth. Nevertheless more of Earths history is ice free. This means no ice at the poles at all.
For us humans though it is much larger. So, if one is concerned about our species you have to factor that in. If one isn't concerned about humans, global warming isn't a problem.
@@coldsoupwithsalt An Ice Age is when Earth has large continental glaciers such as currently exist in Greenland and Antarctica. The current warm spell is one of several interglacial periods.
@@coldsoupwithsalt There is ice at the poles so we are definitely still in this ice age. We are in one of the interglacial periods of this ice age. Ice ages have glacial and interglacial periods. Since the pre Cambrian ice age we have 4 or 5 ice ages. Most last millions of years. But the time between ice ages is even longer.
It's not that fast but it is happening. You may have noticed that Miami is spending more and more each year to protect its shores. If you haven't noticed that, then you should do some research.
@@coldsoupwithsalt We are in an interglacial. When we start to move out of it, the water line is going to quickly go the other direction. Don't believe me? Research Bering land bridge. I win.
I was thinking the same thing also with the Great Lakes being interconnected with each other and the ocean wouldn’t that make a huge difference at even 3-5 meters?
@@gj1234567899999 no one cares about how high tho, we just came here to see a simulation and not learn about how high will the sea level be if all those ice melts :/
miami has already had to seal off is rain water run off to the ocean - the ocean was coming back up the pipes into the city. they built a wall to hold back the water, but the ground there is porous, and the water is coming up through the ground. it is happening now. not in the future. now.
Impossible since there isn't that much water even if you melted every glacier and ice shelf on the planet including Antarctica. 250ft max, which is still bad for places like Florida and parts of the East coast.
@@nebtheweb8885 the elements that make up water can be dumped en masse on a planet during a nova event or from impactors from some other system. Not saying it's going to happen but it's possible
We'd have to import water from another planet to do that lol. Or the tectonic plates could accelerate to several thousand times their normal movement rate and subduct continental plate under oceanic to lower the average land height
Except it's actually happening in many places, but you haven't noticed it. Gulf states losing coastal wetlands, beaches shrinking in many places on both coasts, stronger storms on average, more frequent and worse wildfires, these are all happening now.
@@coldsoupwithsaltDo some research. Fewer wildfires than past decades, the 1930s was easily 2x worse. If you have been taught that coastlines aren't affected by the ordinary actions of the tides, you've been kept in the dark. Marsh "reclamation" doesn't work and never lasts. You have been lied to.
As amazing as this video is, it doesn't take into account the fluctuation of earthquake and volcanic activity that would occur over a 4000m sea level change. The Earth mantel and climate are in constant Flux. This is just a basic topography demonstration ( not unlike draining the oceans).
Yeah. Citrus, banana, and avocado, growers in the tropics will go bankrupt -- because Canada will dominate the market. Wheat and corn all over the Arctic and in the fertile valleys of Antarctica. Is this a problem?
Actually this whole planet is one big ongoing erosion. Rains deposits the water on the high ground it washes a little bit down every time. Into the rivers and out to sea where it continues to fill in the trenches little by little. In a billion or so years if we do nothing to push the rock, sediment dirt etc back up the whole world will be flat and covered in water. Would never happen though we do way too much building and Earth moving.
Nobody ever takes into account the weight of the water and the new pressure on the Teutonic plates which would now cause movement and volcanic activity. So in short the world map would no longer look like that so predictions of sea level rise based on no movement are just scare tactics. The results would be unpredictable.
My father passed away in 1972. A staunch Democrat, he supported the party without question. Except when it came to taxes. He hated any new taxes that took money from his pocket. Once he made the comment "someday the Democrats will figure out a way to tax the weather" in jest. Little did he know how prolific he was being.
Just remember the parties flipped in the 60's when Johnson signed the civil rights act. Before that it was Conservative Democrats in the south and Liberal Republicans in the north. No one in my family would have ever voted Republican. Today no one in my family would ever vote Democrat.
It's weird that, while the west coast remains somewhat intact between 75-200m (except for the flooding of the Central Valley of CA and flooding in Cascadia), the entirety of the gulf southeast is underwater...
Just goes to show they can't even be honest with their map. 4000 meters is 12,000 feet, nothing except the highest mountains would be above water. Unless I've been incorrect my entire life and the west coast actual is miles above sea level (1 mile = 5,280 feet).
I think a lot of that is because, other than a few small beaches, the majority fo the west coastline is lined with mountains. There are tons of steep cliff looking shorelines when you look at photos of the west coast. To get to any coast if you are in Washington, Oregon, or California, you almost always have to cross some range of smaller mountains. The water will for sure come in through the river inlets and flood the interior through those openings. But beyond that, the majority of the coast will be less affected. Of course, since almost all major cities in the world are super close to the coast, those cities will still be wiped out. :p
@@drawingdead9025 ... but this person's comment was about the 75 to 200m range..? You are correct for sure that nothing but the highest mountains would be above water by 4k meters lol. I don't even think there's enough liquid in the world to even do that though. :p
Show us a video of the sea level fluctuations over the last 2000 years!! All the doomsday seekers should move to Russia, live the lifestyle of yoir dreams, for we all know the water won't flood Russia because it's higher on the globe than we are!!
Remember the movie Waterworld? When I was young, I thought it was awesome when he showed her that cities were under water. Now it is slightly disturbing to think that.
Interesting. The thing is as water advances in this manner the coverage changes due to the amount of land it covers. Water can only spread so far throughout the world, an as another person has written all ice melting will rise sea levels around 230ft.
Ahh what a nice Salt Lake we have here in Salt Lake City. Wakes up in the morning during this video: WHOA how did it get so big? It’s getting BIGGER I’m gonna have to move NOW!
There's probably 20-30 peaks over 1600m, & a handful over 2000m in Tennessee & North Carolina. So this animation is skewed somewhat (by the time it reaches Appalachia in any case), about 600m
I've been hearing this for 50 years. Ice expands when it freezes, fill a glass with ice and water to the rim, leave overnight and in the morning you will see a glass full of water, NO spill over. 5th grade Sci ! BTW, the scary music doesn't work.
Do an experiment. Take a glass, fill it uo past the rim with ice. Then fill with water to the rim. Let the ice melt. More than likely it will not overflow. As water turns to ice, it expands 10%.
@@Johny-JJI most of the icecaps in the world are located in 2 places, Greenland and Antarctica. Both of which are very large landmasses that are elevated thousands of feet above sea level. These ice caps account for roughly 80% of all ice on earth, the ocean ice is only about 18%. The rest are glaciers in various parts of the world.
@@Johny-JJI I'm not sure what you mean by that but I guess you could call Antarctica a wall of ice, not an impassable one. More like a gradual slope up to high elevations
Pretty sure I read somewhere that if all the ice melts in the world, glacier and mountain, the sea level would rise 75 meters. With that in mind, you only need to watch to 1:50 to get an idea what it'll really look like in that scenario.
@@williamchiafos3889 Do you have a source of information to say that 75 meters is "utter nonsence"? From all the CREDIBLE sources that I have just looked into, they state it's 70 meters. Only 5 meters off from my original statement. So, are you just talking out your ass for giggles on youtube or are you just genuinely that stupid. The fact that this video shows 4000 meters of water rising on earth is just for cinematic effect to entertain people and raise views.
@@adjacentchannel I guess you can attack the climate change narrative, but disputing what would happen if all ice melts is just next level lol. You literally only need to know the volume of ice and calculate how much water that represents when melted and put thqt next to known topographical information. It doesn't involve any predictive models, elements of chais theory, etc. So how anyone could dispute what you said is beyond me 🤣
@@dekippiesip Never disputed it, only stated what the scientists that are respected in this field said about how much water would be produced if all ice melted. So no, it's not "next level".
Dang it. I tried and tried to find this a few years ago when Forrest Fenn said the treasure he hid was above a certain elevation. Congratulations to whoever found it.
Science: Sea levels increase 0.1 inch a year. In 100years sea level will be 3ft higher than today. Me: If the rate is linear, wouldn't it be only 10 inches higher, not 3ft? Or are you assuming an increasing rate of sea level change?
Not 1 inch a year. 1 inch a year now, but if CO2 concentration keeps rising closer to exponentially instead of the flat rate increase you're talking, then air and sea temperatures and therefore sea level probably won't rise at a flat rate. Thats early highschool lernin right there. Probably 8th grade science by now.
@@AmeriMutt76 one thing is that for every foot of rise it takes more water to make the next foot. The great salt lake did reach 4212 above sea-level but the surface area would almost double to get to 4218
@@AmeriMutt76 It's not 1 inch/year, it's 0.12 inch/year, and for the past century the rate of rise has been consistent. This presentation doesn't take into account the effect of more surface area of water, leading to more evaporation and more clouds; nor does it account for continental drift or the sinking and rising of tectonic plates.
That is not fact, not science, you are buying into global warmism. I learned that long ago. the warmists predicted 30 years ago that the ice caps would be gone by now. hahaha Liars!
Not only would it be scary to see the sea levels rising like this at such an absurd rate.. I can imagine the polar shifts in weather when the ocean takes of mostly all of the east.. remember the west and east are divided by there differences in cultivation/ rain fall and many other factors.. since the east gets more precipitation it's more lush with green.. now with this 180 degree shift I wonder how places like Texas or new Mexico looked like halfway thru it's flooding..
That’s true, but that’s because the cubes are submerged, it’s the ice above the waterline that would cause a rise. However, man induced climate change is a scam so don’t worry about it.
What they fail to realize, is when the water gets deeper in one place, the weight of the water pushes land up in another place. We are floating on a molten lava core.
I have had 30 years of pole shift dreams,lived in Austin, Texas when they started,was given the number of feet the water would rise there to 661' above sea level.I now reside in San Angelo,Texas at about 1900',at the western edge of the Texas Hill Country and the Edwards Plateau
I've had some intense dreams about poleshift/earthchanges as well over the years. I have seen maps of where things were at before I ever looked at maps of such things and elevation levels and they were shockingly in alignment. Mine appeared to show water getting all the way up to Oklahoma City before receding. There are high winds and lots of buildings on fire, cars overturned flooding etc. I don't know what details you might have to offer but I would be interested if it coincides much.
@@palehorse1111 I once dreamt that sea level rose up to 3 th - 4,000 ft in elevation as I stood upon the Blue Ridge parkway here in the App Mtns in NC.There were mountains on one side of the road and the ocean was on the other.That was 30 years ago when i had that dream and I still remember it vividly. I have had many other more personal dreams come true,if not nearly all of them.Seems like the only time i dream,it's about the future or a message from the "spirit world"...Watch Suspicious Observers here on YT if u don't already.They do sun forecasts,and the sun is what is triggering the pole shifts.
@@brotherlittlefoot2216 Suspicious observers actually brought me to this video I have been subscribed for a long time. I think people having dreams about this and it being so widespread has to mean something like this will occurr to some degree. it seems that aliens may intercede and mitigate the disaster as another one of my dreams involve some kind of UFO as well bringing people on board to save them or for some purpose I don't know exactly.
That's not what Obama said. He said Global warming was the single greatest threat in politics today. Then he went and bought two separate beach front properties.
Only safe place until about a 3500ft sea level rise is atop the highest mountain in the Rock Mtns of Colorado. Humbling video. My city was lost at 262 ft. What’s urs?
I find this somewhat dubious. Firstly, even if all the ice on the planet melted, we're talking something more like a 70m (200 ft) rise, not a 4,000m rise in sea levels. In other words, about 1:44. This does affect some major cities, like NYC and Houston, but other than Florida and Delaware (and maybe Rhode Island?), doesn't affect a lot of US states in the sense of completely eating them. Louisiana comes close, though. Would eat up a lot of major cities and force people inland, though. The 4,000m number here seems to be chosen in a sort of "How can we make it look like the entire world/nation will be underwater?" than anything from reality - as a 4,000m rise would overtake all but the tallest mountain ranges on the planet. Secondly, the pattern here is a bit odd. The west coast itself would remain somewhat above water, but all the major cities would not, and Gulf of Baha would spill over into the flats of Arizona and flood inland. Thirdly, another interesting thing to note is that the Atlantic and Pacific coasts are actually NOT at the same height. I don't remember the reasoning for this (I think it has to do with the Earth's rotation, possibly something akin to the Coriolis effect in that the oceans will wash higher on the coasts along the "leading edge" of the Earth's rotation), but regardless of the reason, there is a height difference that can be witnessed when crossing the Panama Canal. And no, I don't mean the individual locks, I mean the sea/ocean level on either side is different, though I don't recall by how much. Though this is more an "interesting thing to note" than anything. Fourthly, it's also interesting to note that most of the major cities are under water or coastal by 200m or so. Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio basically become coastal cities at that point...though this is SOMETHING of a lie as far as shipping goes. A city at 200m above sea level (today) would technically be coastal with a 200m rise...but that means the land just on the ocean side would be 1-10m deep, not deep enough for major ships. So they aren't EXACTLY coastal in that sense unless they have a river today or a channel drudged out for ships or employ flat-bottomed transport ships. But, again, estimates are for 70m rise, and that's if ALL the ice ON THE PLANET melted and fell into the oceans. Which isn't really a realistic scenario even now. . I like how Arkansas/the Ozarks hold on as a little island state until 660m.
I see that as usual US citizens seem to have no grasp of the fact that the impact on the whole world of even a few meters of sea-level rise will be catastrophic. A peek above the US’ parochial horizons will reveal an existential threat is looming for us all. Comfort yourself in your profligate climate-change forcing bubble until the merde really hits the fan. W.hen the climate tips over we will all be a downward spiral to the new Middle Ages.
@@johnashton4086 I'm literally calling out bad science. If knowing the actual science, understanding science, and seeing this minsinformation for the misinformation it is is "usual US citizens", then that's a complement. Yes, I know that a 10-20 meter rise would doom a lot of low lying island nations. I'd love to see a simulation of a 0-70m rise of the whole planet like this (this doesn't even show all of the US since Alaska and Hawaii aren't in it) and discuss the whole thing. But I'm opposed to using scare tactics to drive people to take actions. That's not science, that's lying to children about the bad monster that will eat them if they don't do their chores. So let's stick with the science, shall we? Climate change would suck. There are lots of reasons to oppose it without lying. So don't lie. The entire US wouldn't flood - again, 70m would be about the rise, not 4,000m. And let's be real, Humans are an insanely adaptable species. We, collectively as a species, would survive this. There would still be a lot of arable land, crops to grow, trees to produce oxygen and base energy for the food chain and ecosystem. Even non-Human life tends to be surprisingly more adaptable than we give it credit, and most life on the planet would also adapt. And the change is gradual - the IPCC itself estimates around 1m rise by 2100. A 70m rise would likely take hundreds or even THOUSANDS of years, which is a lot of time for technology and evolution to adapt. Don't tell lies about scary monsters that don't exist - the planet isn't doomed or post some mythical "point of no return" in a decade, nor are we all going to die within a currently alive Human's lifetime - tell the truth. It's not as scary or "sexy", but it's what should be more than enough to convince people of the need. And if it's not...your lies aren't going to work any better anyway. Especially not when people realize you've lied to them and galvanize against you.
It seems to be a simple heightmap with a global water level rising without actually physically interacting with the ground. Approaching accurate enough, to the eye at this scale for the first few meters.
No time frame given for this impossible rise. Why does the east coast flood at sea level and the west coast at sea level is unaffected? How much has the level risen in the past 100 years?
zilch. In fact Iwo Jima is some 50 feet up from 1940's. Obstacles the Japs put under water around the island to deter military landings ARE HIGH AND DRY!!! And in the S. Pacific west toward Australia, islands there are rising. The southern tip of Fl is sinking (geologic subduction) because the Caribbean tectonic plate is pushing the N. American plate down. Conversely over in the Pacific the Australian T plate is pushing against the Pacific Plate and is causing the sea floor to buckle upward (and about a thousand miles east of that the floor is buckling down, and some Islands ARE sinking) but it is all due to tectonic plate shifts not melting ice. I dont understand why so called scientists overlook these functions.
We'll considering North America seems to be taking all the water on the planet and borrowing some more water from other nearby planets, I'd say the rest of the planet would be a washed out dried out dessert of canyons.
If you Google "projected rise in sea level by 2050" you'll find out that sea levels are expected to rise by 30 centimeters (or 30% of ONE meter) by 2050 & 65 centimeters (or 65% of 1 meter) by 2100. The rest of the video beyond the first projected 1 meter sea level rise is interesting, but we won't see those sea level increases within our lifetimes. Even that 1st 1 meter sea level increase isn't forecasted to happen until sometime between 2110 and 2120. I'm not too worried. For one, traditional green energy sources continue to improve. But much better than windmills and solar panels is the promise of fusion energy. If we can perfect it (the same process that gives the sun it's energy) then all of our clean energy problems will be solved. If the Human race succeeds in perfecting this ultimate source of energy we may be able to not only stop the advance of climate change but possibly be able to reverse it.
Problem with fusion (at least currently) is that it requires exotic hydrogen isotopes which don't exist in large quantities on Earth and are hard to extract
@@ironmickXD Nope. Follow the money. Elites who care nothing about anything but their property are still building billion dollar high rise properties only a few feet above sea level. If the rate of sea level rise were going to increase, they would build far above sea level. They are not stupid and they have all the resources and the inclination to know what's incredibly unlikely to happen. Incidentally, many of these elites say they believe that sea level rise will increase exponentially. Yeah, their own money is telling on them.
I tried mapping flood on GeoHECRAS while increasing elevation as a joke; but the results that came out were pretty astonishing. Then I came across this video and it all made sense.
I mean it's neat to think about, but even if every glacier and body of ice melted, at most the sea levels would only rise between 70-100m. So why go all the way to 4000m? Literally impossible.
Yes, but can you actually say totally impossible. No one knows what major catastrophe might cause this, as being hit by some type of huge rogue meteor or something else.
Pole shift which is possibly twelve months away could create an equatorial bulge anywhere which could put any land mass underwater. Mammoth eating tropical plants one day frozen solid the next day 6,000 pd animal flash frozen. Tropical Trees in Norway. It can happen
I remember 20 years ago I was on the mall in DC and some Native Americans and others were talking about how in the near future that there would be palm trees everywhere on the East Coast and it would be tropical and winter and snow Etc would disappear and they called it science. They said it was science because a supposed majority of so-called scientists believed that it was the case and somehow science changed from being based in hypothesis and conjecture to being based on consensus, a sort of mandatory groupthink based in a consensus thought paradigm. Videos like this are the result of it. Oh and by the way, it's snowing and cold here in Virginia in 2022.
Oceans Depth Visualization
ruclips.net/video/X4pv-7DW-0c/видео.htmlsi=ARKkeeo_Mq3hOUlt
East Coast: *drowning*
West Coast: Y'all hear something?
Florida foolnds :eereeeeeeeeeeee
@@drewORibbit Arizona says no
@@drewORibbitNot Washington, it’s always raining
@@drewORibbit TRUE
Yes it's the fires, homeless fighting and police helicopters telling you to stay in your homes...
If all the ice covering Antarctica , Greenland, and in mountain glaciers around the world were to melt, sea level would rise about 70 meters (230 feet)
Just high enough for Arizona to have a beach
I’m fine with that lol
And we can also wave goodbye to disneyworld
Not gonna happen they’ve been saying that shit for 40 years
not gonna happen because ice has higher volume per density and most of the glaciers are submerged underwater
I love the introduction to WATER WORLD.
Naw earth is now gonna called WATAH 🤑🤑🤑
Or The Land Beneath The Surface
This video is how 6 year old me thought the world would be like in 10 years after learning about climate change for the first time
Then why did Obama buy beachfront property on Martha's Vineyard?
@@davidlafleche1142 cause hes rich duh
Climate change is so overplayed.
@@catboynestormakhno2694 But Obama obviously does not believe that ocean levels are rising. If he really believed that, he would have bought land in the mountains.
@@davidlafleche1142 dude, hes rich he doesnt give a shit, he likes the view, and can just move when its an issue. youre just wrong my guy
Never underestimate the power of Florida man. Once he learns his meth and nephson are in danger he will fix all of our problems
🤣
Floridia is the first to go
@@UV_Lightning it’s Delaware, Florida is 2nd
@@Pixlford Britton hill is the highest point in Florida at 345 feet and the highest point in Delaware is The Ebright Azimuth which has an elevation of 448 feet.
@@UV_Lightning Well, in the naked eye
Edit: On this map
I am 64, lived on the gulf coast all my life.
The coast line hasn't moved through the coming ice age (1970s), global warming (1990s) and now climate change.
These "experts" seem to miss the mark in all directions.
I'm sure it's all safe and effective tho😅.
They told us that by the year 2000 sea levels would rise at least three meters. My boat dock at the Jersey shore is still at the exact same level as it was in 1970.
I have been surfing in Oregon for the last 35 years. The sea level hasn't changed by a mm.
Money and votes... money and votes... gotta get that sweet, sweet power somehow.
Yep, the climate has been changing 4 times every year here in the USA, and everything is fine.
Oh? No fish in the streets?
I love how the water near the Mississippi was just snaking upwards just to flood michigan.
I was watching the St. Lawrence and the lower two Great Lakes. The water was snaking up there too.
I noticed the same thing with Dallas, Texas and Chicago, Illinois
Sounds personal (wink)!!
@@lindahh798 really?
@FukYerFeelins sounds like you're scared and you name and picture show you emotionally overreact easily
super nice to call out 70 meters as the 'max all planet ice' melts height... thank you...
You have to take into account heat added to the water too
And it's all going thappen 2 weeks from now! Greta and AOC confirmed it!
So we lose NY and Florida ...who cares?
And DC as I said who cares?
@@timothyhall861you can actually have waterfront property in Arizona too 😂
Yea I’ve been hearing this since the 90s, but the beach at Malibu is the same as it was in 68
As is the water line on the island of the Statue of Liberty. No change.
And Plymouth Rock is still visible
@johnfaris5376
And the island Al Gore said was covered by sea level rise during his run for president he never identified or named.
Thank you! Been hearing this bs since 1972! All a bunch of crap! In the 80s it was the next ice age, then a hole in the ozone layer. All a bunch of crap from a bunch of 'chicken littles' and eco scam artists. What a grift!
Seriously people just Google sea level rise. There are places everywhere that is has been documented. Coastal forests dying because of salt water intrusion. Beach erosion especially in the northeast. I'm sure there are reasons certain are seeing the effects sooner than others but the overall trend is obvious. By the way this video is ridiculous as it's impossible for the sea level to rise that high even if all the ice everywhere melted. It would be bad though.
Earth: Haves a sea level rise
Florida: Chuckles i'm in danger
And Delaware, but at a lower rate (slightly)
FLORIDA IS A NON SURVIVOR DEATH ZONE SECONDARY TO THE POLAR SHIFT…Anyone there now as of May 2024 has to make immediate relocation to the higher altitudes in order to survive…
The New Madrid Fault ( The Great Quake) will occur by BEFORE The Polar Shift Event & will split North America in 2 and wreak havoc on the entire Continental U.S. infrastructure. Evacuation of coastal areas and the New Madrid area should’ve taken place ALREADY
but if you haven’t relocated to a Safe Zone yet, you need to begin immediately NOW….Time is of the essence…
God’s Speed 🙏🏻❤️
At least they're under water before Ohio 😂
Back to the sea I go!
At 3:53 you can easily see some new peninsulas and that big massive new island called the Appalachian island.
Slightly north of Appalachian Island would be Adirondack Island and northeast of that, Maine island
I think that would just become Appalachia
If you look closely you can see the flint hills in eastern Kansas becoming a small series of islands. I was wondering if they were significantly higher than the surrounding areas.
This is kinda scary but better be prepared than sorry and niave
There is a lot i missed in school during the 80s ,but i do remember being told about the flooding from the melted glaciers that would happen in 20 years !,..... must not be 20 years yet!
they also failed to mention is that there isn't enough ice to melt to cause anywhere near this amount of flood. the absolute highest sea levels have only reached 20 ft higher than now.
All bullshit, just like running out of oil.
Tell that to Louisiana, they've already lost large parts of their coastal wetlands and they're losing more each year.
@coldsoupwithsalt iam not saying nothing has happened just not as extreme in a much longer time.
Unfortunately the rate of increase is more exponential than linear
At 3900m California has downgraded the drought emergency and begins allowing people to water their seabeds and wash their boats.
Too funny.
😂💯
Another intresting thing is the water appearing to cover inland baisons with no conection to the sea
. At 1300 meters the great salt desert starts to flood yet the rim of the baison at red Rock pass is at least 700 feet higher
This would also help the southern portion of the Colorado River.
Similarly, the map showed changes in the great lakes well before Niagara falls were over topped. So there must be some errors in this simulation.
I don't think they actually accounted for real topographical realities. Just added sea level on an empty globe and it filled in the cracks automatically without regard to how the water would get there. 70m is the max possible sea level rise. A hundred meters if we're being excessively generous and accounting for things like increased rainfall. So, most people on earth if they can move as people do, are fine.
This isn't a flood map. It is a very colorful elevation map. That's why.
Fear porn doesn't have to reflect the actual fact of topography. It only has to create fear. So stop with the facts be afraid very afraid makes you easier to control.
In Earth's history, ice ages, such as the current one we're living in, are rare. The most common state of Earth is warmer with little ice.
I think they occupy close to 30 of the geological time. A couple of them lasted hundreds of millions of years. The Precambrian was probably the biggest and is often called Snow Ball Earth. Nevertheless more of Earths history is ice free. This means no ice at the poles at all.
For us humans though it is much larger.
So, if one is concerned about our species you have to factor that in.
If one isn't concerned about humans, global warming isn't a problem.
"The current one we're living in" Huh? The last one ended over ten thousand years ago. What are you talking about?
@@coldsoupwithsalt An Ice Age is when Earth has large continental glaciers such as currently exist in Greenland and Antarctica. The current warm spell is one of several interglacial periods.
@@coldsoupwithsalt There is ice at the poles so we are definitely still in this ice age. We are in one of the interglacial periods of this ice age. Ice ages have glacial and interglacial periods. Since the pre Cambrian ice age we have 4 or 5 ice ages. Most last millions of years. But the time between ice ages is even longer.
I've been waiting for 30 years for Miami to be covered in water....NEVER HAPPENED.
Yup in just 5 years they said. They've been using this scare tactic to raise taxes and take away freedoms for 50 years now. POS liars.
It's not that fast but it is happening. You may have noticed that Miami is spending more and more each year to protect its shores. If you haven't noticed that, then you should do some research.
@@coldsoupwithsalt We are in an interglacial. When we start to move out of it, the water line is going to quickly go the other direction. Don't believe me? Research Bering land bridge. I win.
Are you still living there ?
@@coldsoupwithsalt Natural erosion.... Look at the northwest coastline to help understand it's been happening for 1000's and 1000's of years....
After 1600 meter, people in denver be like "Finally, we're coastal city"
Good thing there isn't enough frozen water on earth to make sea levels rise even 10% of that.
Wont be any people left to visit
@@lljjay2602 Well, since even if all frozen water on earth melted it wouldn't be 5% of 1600 meters so we don't have to worry.
I'm not sure this is accurate. The rivers would begin to overflow their banks and flood the interior US much faster.
I was thinking the same thing also with the Great Lakes being interconnected with each other and the ocean wouldn’t that make a huge difference at even 3-5 meters?
Why would they do that? They wouldn’t start overflowing until they hit the ocean.
Oh man, I just realized that all the cities appear at the bottom and there are many cities...
And i know the best city name ever, Chandler
George Strait could finally get his ocean front property in Arizona😂😂😂
Frank Ocean, can finally sell that beach house in Idaho 😂😂
Florida men: Well boys, time to sell our houses and move
bro the music you put in these videos is so calming the second song is giving so many water world vibes love your vids
The bagpipes at the end is spot on
@@terrygrimes2965 it fits so well
Shocking that it took longer for nc to sink then half of Canada's land
If all the ice melted the sea level rise would be 70 meters. That’s high but nowhere near 4000 m. Think about why this video didn’t tell you that.
@@gj1234567899999 shut up
@@gj1234567899999 *_It's just a cool video to put elevation into context. Why does everything have to have some damn ulterior motive?_*
@@Civilized-Joke -- Probably because it has an ulterior motive.
@@gj1234567899999 no one cares about how high tho, we just came here to see a simulation and not learn about how high will the sea level be if all those ice melts :/
Sea level has risen roughly 200mm since 1876. It's going to take a long time to get to 1 meter
LIE
shhhh, youll ruin their little fantasy
Dang, Florida just vanishes that quickly, huh?
So does new Orleans lol
What happens when the land is sinking. Seas aren't rising.
And delaware ...
And delaware
miami has already had to seal off is rain water run off to the ocean - the ocean was coming back up the pipes into the city. they built a wall to hold back the water, but the ground there is porous, and the water is coming up through the ground. it is happening now. not in the future. now.
This may actually happen sometime in the next 250,000 years, but humans will have very little to do with it.
Impossible since there isn't that much water even if you melted every glacier and ice shelf on the planet including Antarctica. 250ft max, which is still bad for places like Florida and parts of the East coast.
I call BS on "man made climate change." Just another method of controlling the "hoi pelloi" or the "great unwashed." Wake up, please.
@@nebtheweb8885 the elements that make up water can be dumped en masse on a planet during a nova event or from impactors from some other system. Not saying it's going to happen but it's possible
We'd have to import water from another planet to do that lol. Or the tectonic plates could accelerate to several thousand times their normal movement rate and subduct continental plate under oceanic to lower the average land height
This could only happen in fiction, like the story of Noah's Ark.
I've been hearing about our impending doom for fifty years. Still here.
Except it's actually happening in many places, but you haven't noticed it. Gulf states losing coastal wetlands, beaches shrinking in many places on both coasts, stronger storms on average, more frequent and worse wildfires, these are all happening now.
@coldsoupwithsalt and if we let the government steal more of our money, they will fix it.🤣🤣
@@coldsoupwithsaltDo some research. Fewer wildfires than past decades, the 1930s was easily 2x worse. If you have been taught that coastlines aren't affected by the ordinary actions of the tides, you've been kept in the dark. Marsh "reclamation" doesn't work and never lasts. You have been lied to.
@@coldsoupwithsalt thanks chicken little
Very well made! Thank you! Your choice off music very 👍 nice. Thank you!
As amazing as this video is, it doesn't take into account the fluctuation of earthquake and volcanic activity that would occur over a 4000m sea level change. The Earth mantel and climate are in constant Flux. This is just a basic topography demonstration ( not unlike draining the oceans).
If all the ice melted the sea level rise would be 70 meters. That’s high but nowhere near 4000 m. Think about why this video didn’t tell you that.
Not to mention how the cake recipes will have to change for these areas.
Not to mention the fact that is isn't enough frozen water on earth to rise even 100 meters much less 4000.
@@venusfirenza2547 LOL!
If that were even possible, The air pressure would increase a shit ton, and there would be some insane ass primordial storms lol.
If all the ice on Earth melts, we've got bigger problems than flooding.
Not really.
Yes! Boat slip rentals will skyrocket!
Uh, the primordial viruses.
Yeah. Citrus, banana, and avocado, growers in the tropics will go bankrupt -- because Canada will dominate the market. Wheat and corn all over the Arctic and in the fertile valleys of Antarctica. Is this a problem?
East USA: *struggling*
West USA: *Cowboy Mode activated*
*When Colorado is under water it means danger*
Wow you're a bright one.
No, when Colorado is under water, it means humanity is dead
I live in Lincoln, Nebraska I’m doomed, 6 months ago I moved out of Virginia Beach I thought I was in the clear.
No, when Colorado is under water it means the illuminati airport city is sol.
People forget about the sediment and rocks brought by river
Actually this whole planet is one big ongoing erosion. Rains deposits the water on the high ground it washes a little bit down every time. Into the rivers and out to sea where it continues to fill in the trenches little by little. In a billion or so years if we do nothing to push the rock, sediment dirt etc back up the whole world will be flat and covered in water.
Would never happen though we do way too much building and Earth moving.
Nobody ever takes into account the weight of the water and the new pressure on the Teutonic plates which would now cause movement and volcanic activity. So in short the world map would no longer look like that so predictions of sea level rise based on no movement are just scare tactics. The results would be unpredictable.
*Tectonic plates. Teutonic is a Germanic cultural & linguistic group in Europe.
@@DrachenGothik666 thanks, spell check works poorly, proof read does not work at all.
as well as weather...tides...ground liquation... and fresh water damns
Florida: aight bye ima go swim
Florida is SINKING. People think the sea is rising because of propaganda like this.
@Zorawar Bharaj “Florida think sinking, people is the sea think rising because of propaganda like this.”
U sound dumb
@Zorawar Bharajyes, Florida is sinking.
My father passed away in 1972. A staunch Democrat, he supported the party without question. Except when it came to taxes. He hated any new taxes that took money from his pocket. Once he made the comment "someday the Democrats will figure out a way to tax the weather" in jest. Little did he know how prolific he was being.
Most democrats support everyone ELSE paying taxes.
Just remember the parties flipped in the 60's when Johnson signed the civil rights act. Before that it was Conservative Democrats in the south and Liberal Republicans in the north. No one in my family would have ever voted Republican. Today no one in my family would ever vote Democrat.
It's weird that, while the west coast remains somewhat intact between 75-200m (except for the flooding of the Central Valley of CA and flooding in Cascadia), the entirety of the gulf southeast is underwater...
Just goes to show they can't even be honest with their map. 4000 meters is 12,000 feet, nothing except the highest mountains would be above water. Unless I've been incorrect my entire life and the west coast actual is miles above sea level (1 mile = 5,280 feet).
I think a lot of that is because, other than a few small beaches, the majority fo the west coastline is lined with mountains. There are tons of steep cliff looking shorelines when you look at photos of the west coast. To get to any coast if you are in Washington, Oregon, or California, you almost always have to cross some range of smaller mountains. The water will for sure come in through the river inlets and flood the interior through those openings. But beyond that, the majority of the coast will be less affected. Of course, since almost all major cities in the world are super close to the coast, those cities will still be wiped out. :p
@@drawingdead9025 ... but this person's comment was about the 75 to 200m range..? You are correct for sure that nothing but the highest mountains would be above water by 4k meters lol. I don't even think there's enough liquid in the world to even do that though. :p
Mt Whitney in CA is the highest point in the 48 states at over 14500 feet in elevation.
@@drawingdead9025 yes, California's highest point is 14,500 ft
When I was younger we were told the state of Florida would be under water by 2021
That seemed like such a long time away back then. Yet, here we are.
3 years later and still no change
According to al gore, this already happened in 2000, we just all died and didn't realize it.
Show us a video of the USA if sea levels drop by 1000-2000m.
Show us a video of the sea level fluctuations over the last 2000 years!! All the doomsday seekers should move to Russia, live the lifestyle of yoir dreams, for we all know the water won't flood Russia because it's higher on the globe than we are!!
The world of Waterworld. 🌊🎞️🎬
Remember the movie Waterworld?
When I was young, I thought it was awesome when he showed her that cities were under water. Now it is slightly disturbing to think that.
Awesome! Looks like im going to have ocean front property! Hell yes!
sea levels: *rises by one meter
new orleans: *RUN FOR YOUR LIFES*
Imagine making a map about America using Meters instead of inches.
Meters > inches
@@R0tR0tR0tR0 Agreed.
@@R0tR0tR0tR0 Using meters on a map on the USA is like using inches on a map of europe lol
yankee units
Sad American noises
Fun video, my home area in Ontario lasts quite long into the video.
Really love the calm music as the whole country's being swallowed by water and millions are dying
Interesting. The thing is as water advances in this manner the coverage changes due to the amount of land it covers. Water can only spread so far throughout the world, an as another person has written all ice melting will rise sea levels around 230ft.
You have to take into account heat added to the water too
if pile shift happens we woyld see at least 5000 feet waves coming in and slosh back.
Next Antártica please. 🇦🇶
Imagine Salt Lake City finally having a massive salt lake next to them for once
Ahh what a nice Salt Lake we have here in Salt Lake City.
Wakes up in the morning during this video: WHOA how did it get so big? It’s getting BIGGER I’m gonna have to move NOW!
What?
Sweet I'll finally have some ocean front property
Geez, imagine the separatism and the overseas territories in the whole US through the years it goes underwater.
There's probably 20-30 peaks over 1600m, & a handful over 2000m in Tennessee & North Carolina. So this animation is skewed somewhat (by the time it reaches Appalachia in any case), about 600m
I've been hearing this for 50 years. Ice expands when it freezes, fill a glass with ice and water to the rim, leave overnight and in the morning you will see a glass full of water, NO spill over. 5th grade Sci ! BTW, the scary music doesn't work.
The ice in Greenland and the Antarctica are not floating in the ocean. Their mass sits on land.
You think this music is scary huh? BTW, the ocean and the ice caps are not the same as water in a glass with ice cubes...
Anyone else feel like moving to Denver after watching this?
Nope. Just want to laugh at this bogus graph.
@@williamchiafos3889 how is this bogus 💀
@@59tothegrave4eva considering sea level rise is currently at 1 mm a year.....
@@williamchiafos3889 this is literally hypothetical
@@59tothegrave4eva poor hypothesis then.
Do an experiment. Take a glass, fill it uo past the rim with ice. Then fill with water to the rim. Let the ice melt. More than likely it will not overflow. As water turns to ice, it expands 10%.
What the heck does this have to do with anything, even if it did. A large majority of the ice on earth is actually on land, not in the water
@@DarthLiam-gd1wcreally? I knew the North Pole had Land!
@@Johny-JJI most of the icecaps in the world are located in 2 places, Greenland and Antarctica. Both of which are very large landmasses that are elevated thousands of feet above sea level. These ice caps account for roughly 80% of all ice on earth, the ocean ice is only about 18%. The rest are glaciers in various parts of the world.
@@DarthLiam-gd1wc so the icewall?
@@Johny-JJI I'm not sure what you mean by that but I guess you could call Antarctica a wall of ice, not an impassable one. More like a gradual slope up to high elevations
So many people here are denying climate change because of an exaggerated video
What you're seeing here is about to happen and has nothing to do with climate change.
It looks like a relatively small levee would protect California's central valley.
Pretty sure I read somewhere that if all the ice melts in the world, glacier and mountain, the sea level would rise 75 meters.
With that in mind, you only need to watch to 1:50 to get an idea what it'll really look like in that scenario.
Lol nope. Utter nonsense.
Besides, near record ice growth is laughing.
@@williamchiafos3889 Do you have a source of information to say that 75 meters is "utter nonsence"?
From all the CREDIBLE sources that I have just looked into, they state it's 70 meters. Only 5 meters off from my original statement. So, are you just talking out your ass for giggles on youtube or are you just genuinely that stupid.
The fact that this video shows 4000 meters of water rising on earth is just for cinematic effect to entertain people and raise views.
@@adjacentchannel I guess you can attack the climate change narrative, but disputing what would happen if all ice melts is just next level lol. You literally only need to know the volume of ice and calculate how much water that represents when melted and put thqt next to known topographical information. It doesn't involve any predictive models, elements of chais theory, etc. So how anyone could dispute what you said is beyond me 🤣
@@dekippiesip Never disputed it, only stated what the scientists that are respected in this field said about how much water would be produced if all ice melted. So no, it's not "next level".
@@adjacentchannel dude im defending you, read the entire comment...
Dang it. I tried and tried to find this a few years ago when Forrest Fenn said the treasure he hid was above a certain elevation. Congratulations to whoever found it.
Science: Sea levels increase 0.1 inch a year. In 100years sea level will be 3ft higher than today.
Me: If the rate is linear, wouldn't it be only 10 inches higher, not 3ft? Or are you assuming an increasing rate of sea level change?
Not 1 inch a year. 1 inch a year now, but if CO2 concentration keeps rising closer to exponentially instead of the flat rate increase you're talking, then air and sea temperatures and therefore sea level probably won't rise at a flat rate. Thats early highschool lernin right there. Probably 8th grade science by now.
@@AmeriMutt76 one thing is that for every foot of rise it takes more water to make the next foot. The great salt lake did reach 4212 above sea-level but the surface area would almost double to get to 4218
@Sheila Rider cus its moving slowly
@@AmeriMutt76 It's not 1 inch/year, it's 0.12 inch/year, and for the past century the rate of rise has been consistent. This presentation doesn't take into account the effect of more surface area of water, leading to more evaporation and more clouds; nor does it account for continental drift or the sinking and rising of tectonic plates.
That is not fact, not science, you are buying into global warmism. I learned that long ago. the warmists predicted 30 years ago that the ice caps would be gone by now. hahaha Liars!
Not only would it be scary to see the sea levels rising like this at such an absurd rate.. I can imagine the polar shifts in weather when the ocean takes of mostly all of the east.. remember the west and east are divided by there differences in cultivation/ rain fall and many other factors.. since the east gets more precipitation it's more lush with green.. now with this 180 degree shift I wonder how places like Texas or new Mexico looked like halfway thru it's flooding..
When the ice melts in your drink does the glass overflow?
Of course there isn't 4000 meters of sea level stuck in all the ice in the world but this is mearly a fun what-if scenario!
That's fairly standard for youtube and their "science", but know that every liberal out there took this as hard facts.
@@markbrowning4334 exactly.
4:41 *Wichita:* Hello
Damn...that's pretty sad.
When the ice melts in my glass of ice tea the volume of liquid doesn’t rise. Weird.
That’s true, but that’s because the cubes are submerged, it’s the ice above the waterline that would cause a rise. However, man induced climate change is a scam so don’t worry about it.
Yeah Bernie Sanders said in 1990 the world would be underwater by 1990 Al Gore said what 2012 or 2008 remember the sky is falling
try putting in an ice cube and see what happens.
Do one of just Michigan next!
*mich- why do you want to do that- gan
iF maximum rise would be 70 m
then why go up to 3000 m
Just to terrify people ?
Usa: IM BIG :), IM THE 4TH LARGEST COUNTRY
i'm dutch and i can relate to this
What they fail to realize, is when the water gets deeper in one place, the weight of the water pushes land up in another place. We are floating on a molten lava core.
I have had 30 years of pole shift dreams,lived in Austin, Texas when they started,was given the number of feet the water would rise there to 661' above sea level.I now reside in San Angelo,Texas at about 1900',at the western edge of the Texas Hill Country and the Edwards Plateau
The profit bubba
I've had some intense dreams about poleshift/earthchanges as well over the years. I have seen maps of where things were at before I ever looked at maps of such things and elevation levels and they were shockingly in alignment. Mine appeared to show water getting all the way up to Oklahoma City before receding. There are high winds and lots of buildings on fire, cars overturned flooding etc. I don't know what details you might have to offer but I would be interested if it coincides much.
@@palehorse1111 I once dreamt that sea level rose up to 3 th - 4,000 ft in elevation as I stood upon the Blue Ridge parkway here in the App Mtns in NC.There were mountains on one side of the road and the ocean was on the other.That was 30 years ago when i had that dream and I still remember it vividly. I have had many other more personal dreams come true,if not nearly all of them.Seems like the only time i dream,it's about the future or a message from the "spirit world"...Watch Suspicious Observers here on YT if u don't already.They do sun forecasts,and the sun is what is triggering the pole shifts.
@@brotherlittlefoot2216 Suspicious observers actually brought me to this video I have been subscribed for a long time. I think people having dreams about this and it being so widespread has to mean something like this will occurr to some degree. it seems that aliens may intercede and mitigate the disaster as another one of my dreams involve some kind of UFO as well bringing people on board to save them or for some purpose I don't know exactly.
@@palehorse1111 my friend it is nearly time your dreams where preparation for whats coming soon Tiamat is in our orbit and its wreaking havoc now
United States of Sea
Call me dumb or whatever but can a huge man made river in between the US and the sahara desert decrease world sea level significantly?
@@xhafts that’s not gonna happened it’s just a a video
There is a simple fact that you overlooked. If all the snow and ice on the Earth melted, sea level would rise 240 feet or just under 75 meters!
That's not what Obama said. He said Global warming was the single greatest threat in politics today. Then he went and bought two separate beach front properties.
NOT a "fact"
when Delaware goes underwater at 25 meters
No? Its at 136.5 meters.
@@TFNARMY_2009 according to this map, it's at 25 m. Delaware's average height above normal sea level is 18m
Only safe place until about a 3500ft sea level rise is atop the highest mountain in the Rock Mtns of Colorado. Humbling video. My city was lost at 262 ft. What’s urs?
1,438m for mine.
Pa mountains about 600m.
5,351 for me
Mines only 18ft 🥲 I live in a flat place
According to my compass, I am underwater at 280 feet
Not worried, I got a big boat. Noah gave me some pointers on the jib & gunnels.
I find this somewhat dubious.
Firstly, even if all the ice on the planet melted, we're talking something more like a 70m (200 ft) rise, not a 4,000m rise in sea levels. In other words, about 1:44. This does affect some major cities, like NYC and Houston, but other than Florida and Delaware (and maybe Rhode Island?), doesn't affect a lot of US states in the sense of completely eating them. Louisiana comes close, though. Would eat up a lot of major cities and force people inland, though. The 4,000m number here seems to be chosen in a sort of "How can we make it look like the entire world/nation will be underwater?" than anything from reality - as a 4,000m rise would overtake all but the tallest mountain ranges on the planet.
Secondly, the pattern here is a bit odd. The west coast itself would remain somewhat above water, but all the major cities would not, and Gulf of Baha would spill over into the flats of Arizona and flood inland.
Thirdly, another interesting thing to note is that the Atlantic and Pacific coasts are actually NOT at the same height. I don't remember the reasoning for this (I think it has to do with the Earth's rotation, possibly something akin to the Coriolis effect in that the oceans will wash higher on the coasts along the "leading edge" of the Earth's rotation), but regardless of the reason, there is a height difference that can be witnessed when crossing the Panama Canal. And no, I don't mean the individual locks, I mean the sea/ocean level on either side is different, though I don't recall by how much. Though this is more an "interesting thing to note" than anything.
Fourthly, it's also interesting to note that most of the major cities are under water or coastal by 200m or so. Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio basically become coastal cities at that point...though this is SOMETHING of a lie as far as shipping goes. A city at 200m above sea level (today) would technically be coastal with a 200m rise...but that means the land just on the ocean side would be 1-10m deep, not deep enough for major ships. So they aren't EXACTLY coastal in that sense unless they have a river today or a channel drudged out for ships or employ flat-bottomed transport ships. But, again, estimates are for 70m rise, and that's if ALL the ice ON THE PLANET melted and fell into the oceans. Which isn't really a realistic scenario even now.
.
I like how Arkansas/the Ozarks hold on as a little island state until 660m.
Exactly what I was thinking, is this after a giant ice ball hits the planet or something, where is all this water supposedly coming from?
Of course, but it's a simulation. Sure, You can stop at 70m or run farther.
I see that as usual US citizens seem to have no grasp of the fact that the impact on the whole world of even a few meters of sea-level rise will be catastrophic. A peek above the US’ parochial horizons will reveal an existential threat is looming for us all. Comfort yourself in your profligate climate-change forcing bubble until the merde really hits the fan. W.hen the climate tips over we will all be a downward spiral to the new Middle Ages.
@@johnashton4086 I'm literally calling out bad science. If knowing the actual science, understanding science, and seeing this minsinformation for the misinformation it is is "usual US citizens", then that's a complement.
Yes, I know that a 10-20 meter rise would doom a lot of low lying island nations. I'd love to see a simulation of a 0-70m rise of the whole planet like this (this doesn't even show all of the US since Alaska and Hawaii aren't in it) and discuss the whole thing.
But I'm opposed to using scare tactics to drive people to take actions.
That's not science, that's lying to children about the bad monster that will eat them if they don't do their chores.
So let's stick with the science, shall we?
Climate change would suck. There are lots of reasons to oppose it without lying.
So don't lie.
The entire US wouldn't flood - again, 70m would be about the rise, not 4,000m.
And let's be real, Humans are an insanely adaptable species. We, collectively as a species, would survive this. There would still be a lot of arable land, crops to grow, trees to produce oxygen and base energy for the food chain and ecosystem. Even non-Human life tends to be surprisingly more adaptable than we give it credit, and most life on the planet would also adapt. And the change is gradual - the IPCC itself estimates around 1m rise by 2100. A 70m rise would likely take hundreds or even THOUSANDS of years, which is a lot of time for technology and evolution to adapt.
Don't tell lies about scary monsters that don't exist - the planet isn't doomed or post some mythical "point of no return" in a decade, nor are we all going to die within a currently alive Human's lifetime - tell the truth.
It's not as scary or "sexy", but it's what should be more than enough to convince people of the need.
And if it's not...your lies aren't going to work any better anyway. Especially not when people realize you've lied to them and galvanize against you.
@@holdenrobbins852 From EARTH within.
Where did this projection come from? How many years, months, and days for the total complete flood scenario?
It couldn't happen. It could rise just not that high.
It seems to be a simple heightmap with a global water level rising without actually physically interacting with the ground. Approaching accurate enough, to the eye at this scale for the first few meters.
I just have to laugh my ass off for those people who believe that we're in a climate change😂
No time frame given for this impossible rise. Why does the east coast flood at sea level and the west coast at sea level is unaffected? How much has the level risen in the past 100 years?
zilch. In fact Iwo Jima is some 50 feet up from 1940's. Obstacles the Japs put under water around the island to deter military landings ARE HIGH AND DRY!!! And in the S. Pacific west toward Australia, islands there are rising. The southern tip of Fl is sinking (geologic subduction) because the Caribbean tectonic plate is pushing the N. American plate down. Conversely over in the Pacific the Australian T plate is pushing against the Pacific Plate and is causing the sea floor to buckle upward (and about a thousand miles east of that the floor is buckling down, and some Islands ARE sinking) but it is all due to tectonic plate shifts not melting ice.
I dont understand why so called scientists overlook these functions.
The good ending
Nice, but you forgot the Great Lakes rise. 😊😊😊
Like to see this on a global scale.
We'll considering North America seems to be taking all the water on the planet and borrowing some more water from other nearby planets, I'd say the rest of the planet would be a washed out dried out dessert of canyons.
if sea level rise to 1250m u can still survival in salt lake city, utah
And we all become Mormons
Me: Chilling *my state starts flooding* WOAH! WOAH! WOAHHHH!! HEY HEY HE- 🫨
If you Google "projected rise in sea level by 2050" you'll find out that sea levels are expected to rise by 30 centimeters (or 30% of ONE meter) by 2050 & 65 centimeters (or 65% of 1 meter) by 2100. The rest of the video beyond the first projected 1 meter sea level rise is interesting, but we won't see those sea level increases within our lifetimes. Even that 1st 1 meter sea level increase isn't forecasted to happen until sometime between 2110 and 2120.
I'm not too worried. For one, traditional green energy sources continue to improve. But much better than windmills and solar panels is the promise of fusion energy. If we can perfect it (the same process that gives the sun it's energy) then all of our clean energy problems will be solved. If the Human race succeeds in perfecting this ultimate source of energy we may be able to not only stop the advance of climate change but possibly be able to reverse it.
Problem with fusion (at least currently) is that it requires exotic hydrogen isotopes which don't exist in large quantities on Earth and are hard to extract
Those are the same statistics they were using 30 years ago, and were supposed to have happened by NOW.
Thank god sea levels are not rising any appreciable amounts.
They are tho
@@ironmickXD Nope. Follow the money. Elites who care nothing about anything but their property are still building billion dollar high rise properties only a few feet above sea level. If the rate of sea level rise were going to increase, they would build far above sea level. They are not stupid and they have all the resources and the inclination to know what's incredibly unlikely to happen. Incidentally, many of these elites say they believe that sea level rise will increase exponentially. Yeah, their own money is telling on them.
@@rollupyoursleeves8773 Ever heard of insurance?
@@ironmickXD No they aren’t.
Great! When it melts I will have beachfront property!
l would gladly give my life to make the last image a reality
Same lmao
Unlucky, fat is lighter than water and will simply float on top
Wow someone has issues.
I tried mapping flood on GeoHECRAS while increasing elevation as a joke; but the results that came out were pretty astonishing. Then I came across this video and it all made sense.
Then you have been smoking funny cigarettes.
Great…….200k years from now I will finally have that beach front property….Im looking forward to it.
I mean it's neat to think about, but even if every glacier and body of ice melted, at most the sea levels would only rise between 70-100m. So why go all the way to 4000m? Literally impossible.
Yes, but can you actually say totally impossible. No one knows what major catastrophe might cause this, as being hit by some type of huge rogue meteor or something else.
Pole shift which is possibly twelve months away could create an equatorial bulge anywhere which could put any land mass underwater. Mammoth eating tropical plants one day frozen solid the next day 6,000 pd animal flash frozen. Tropical
Trees in Norway. It can happen
@@rayparkison908 at 10:47 that’s coming at 2100 the year
Shows how much more water we'd need for Waterworld than just the antarctic glaciers
Awesome! I've been waiting almost forty years for this to occur! Still nothing. :(
I realized that they don't mention Colorado springs these days, I'm impressed
I remember 20 years ago I was on the mall in DC and some Native Americans and others were talking about how in the near future that there would be palm trees everywhere on the East Coast and it would be tropical and winter and snow Etc would disappear and they called it science. They said it was science because a supposed majority of so-called scientists believed that it was the case and somehow science changed from being based in hypothesis and conjecture to being based on consensus, a sort of mandatory groupthink based in a consensus thought paradigm. Videos like this are the result of it. Oh and by the way, it's snowing and cold here in Virginia in 2022.
Over a 13000 foot rise in sea level cmon knock it off
Year
0:14 2026
0:27 2035
0:41 3000
1:00 10M
1:24 50M
2:06 100M
3:51 250M
6:21 400M
8:05 800M
10:57 1B