Most excellent pearl. But wait a sec - there's a pre-print publication floating around somewhere from Am J Surg Pathol almost seeming to argue *against* an outright designation of GLILD. And hold on - who's that second author?? ;)
You’re correct on both points. I still find the term useful in communicating with clinicians. They seem to understand what it means. The reality is the pathology is all over the place.
Cool case. Nice discussion. Thank you!
Most excellent pearl. But wait a sec - there's a pre-print publication floating around somewhere from Am J Surg Pathol almost seeming to argue *against* an outright designation of GLILD. And hold on - who's that second author?? ;)
You’re correct on both points. I still find the term useful in communicating with clinicians. They seem to understand what it means. The reality is the pathology is all over the place.