Hi Professor, please make a video lecture related to data preparation for variogram analysis, as u mentioned in the lecture it's up to 80% of work before doing any kind of analysis.Thanks
Hello Professor Pyrcz, I'm wondering why we have to choose a lag distance and a lag tolerance. Is it possible to plot the values of the experimental variogram for each pairs of measured points ? Because if we do the modeling part in order to have all the lag distance possible, I wonder why we group things in the calculation. In short terms, is it a good idea to lessen the lag tolerance and the lag distance a lot to have less groups of pairs considered ? Is there a compromise between statistical accuracy of the experimental variogram and the number of points of this variogram ? Thank you by advance for you response and for your helpful courses. I hope my English is not too bad, I'm a French student.
Howdy Philippe. That is a great idea. My Python package, GeostatsPy scales the experimental variogram points by the number of pairs. This is critical to interpretation.
Thank you so much!
Hi Professor, please make a video lecture related to data preparation for variogram analysis, as u mentioned in the lecture it's up to 80% of work before doing any kind of analysis.Thanks
Hello Professor Pyrcz,
I'm wondering why we have to choose a lag distance and a lag tolerance.
Is it possible to plot the values of the experimental variogram for each pairs of measured points ?
Because if we do the modeling part in order to have all the lag distance possible, I wonder why we group things in the calculation.
In short terms, is it a good idea to lessen the lag tolerance and the lag distance a lot to have less groups of pairs considered ? Is there a compromise between statistical accuracy of the experimental variogram and the number of points of this variogram ?
Thank you by advance for you response and for your helpful courses. I hope my English is not too bad, I'm a French student.
Howdy Philippe. That is a great idea. My Python package, GeostatsPy scales the experimental variogram points by the number of pairs. This is critical to interpretation.
SHouldnt we use a Lognormal distribution transform for permeability for variogram calculation?