Capture One Screws over License Holders | PhotoBits

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 258

  • @billboswell4509
    @billboswell4509 2 года назад +29

    As a hobbyist using CO for 5 years on perpetual licenses I firmly believe a subscription is just an excuse to reduce innovation and trap users. If you can’t come up with some great features for an upgrade that people will buy then why would I pay for a subscription? At least in the end I get to keep using it with a perpetual license but a subscription leaves me with zilch when I quit subscribing.

    • @Sticks55
      @Sticks55 2 года назад +2

      I too am a hobbyist who has been using C1 perpetual for a number of yrs. I did not go for V23 thinking that V22 would do just fine for what I do as an amateur. However if I get a new camera or new lense my version may not support the new gear, which concerns me.

    • @MortAllachie
      @MortAllachie Год назад

      Well, I’ll gladly continue to pay Adobe every month, and help pay for new amazing features in Lightroom and Photoshop. I’ll also gladly pay to get support for new cameras and the ability to sync photos so I can edit on the iPad and iPhone. I also gladly pay so that I can upload my photos when traveling, knowing that the computer at home will download them, and automatically back them up 2 times.

    • @billboswell4509
      @billboswell4509 Год назад +3

      @@MortAllachie what happens to all your edits when you stop paying Adobe?

    • @kocot.
      @kocot. Месяц назад

      @@MortAllachie tbh the workflow improvement for travelling seems like a massive factor for me, being locked with Adobe is annoying, but so are you with C1 catalog. Both ways you need a 3rd party software to migrate, and it wont be perfect copy.

  • @Pipsologie
    @Pipsologie 2 года назад +24

    I upgraded on Black Friday and feel right now quite tricked. Your video brings it right to the point.
    Btw, this is not the first time that they screwed their customer/partners. About a year ago they stopped all their partnerships with capture one mentors and RUclipsrs. People that created for years amazing content for capture one where just dropped in a single day.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад +5

      They are going down. They think they are special, but really they are just falling behind.

    • @EElgar1857
      @EElgar1857 Год назад +1

      I didn't know that; it's disgusting. ☹

  • @craigozancin
    @craigozancin Год назад +17

    I haven't upgraded capture one since version 21. The 22-release added HDR/panorama merging. This was very late to the game, and I have other applications (ON1 Photo Raw is my current preference) that do this. Also, the implementations that Capture one made were very minimal. It wasn't work the update cost of $179, When version 23 came out, it again didn't add anything of value, so I skipped it. Upgrades ended in January and now it is $299. I completely feel abended/punished by Capture one. The only real advantage I had wit Capture One was tethering. I am looking at other options.

    • @panagiotispantazidis2572
      @panagiotispantazidis2572 11 месяцев назад

      is (Smart Shooter 5) an option i have same issue with capture one as you only went their way because of tethering

    • @fredbakhuis7977
      @fredbakhuis7977 9 месяцев назад

      I saw SS5 at work with a friend. Impressive. It's fast, presents customisable info and helps to minimise SSD use through instand selection in keep/delete.

  • @gandolfred
    @gandolfred 2 года назад +7

    If you use a perpetual license of Capture One 23 and the functionality of the version suits you, then you can use it for many years and simply not update. No need to pay for Capture One and then it is more profitable than a subscription. Let Capture One look for those who are willing to sit on their expensive subscription. I am sure that they will soon feel a decrease in sales. Usually only financial losses force something to rethink and change approaches. Imho. 😉✌

    • @ironchefboyardeee
      @ironchefboyardeee Год назад +4

      That’s what I don’t get about this whole video. If you buy software out right, I’d expect bug fixes and usability updates, not the latest version of the software for free forever. How is that sustainable for the software company?

    • @CrisURace
      @CrisURace 9 месяцев назад +1

      I just want new cameras to be supported ...like r6mk2. I don't give a poop on new features, my 22 is fine as it is... i don't care about tether and crap like that. Just want my new body to work on it. it's really expensive to pay the version it supports new bodies...it's unfair and bullpoop , very disappointed with them tbh

    • @kocot.
      @kocot. Месяц назад

      yeah, the problem is that youre supposed to get updates for until the next major version, same as with every other sofware you buy. And there are standard for versioning software. C1 adds several bodies/lenses and calls it a major version update, that's ridiculous. Also in most applications the support for lenses, etc would be something external to the software, that you could import regardless the version, unless there is a massive technical change behind it

  • @kocot.
    @kocot. Месяц назад +2

    100% true, I escaped from Adobe and used to recommend C1 to everyone, but year after year I'm getting just more disappointed. The progress is minimal, user requested features not provided, the new versions are mostly done to cut off those who paid for the full license from any further updates as it would not be considered a major release for most applications. I can harldy justify paying for C1 anymore and I'll probably jump the ship next year. And in all this, the fact they are not even interested in providing an Android mobile app is laughable.

  • @madaboutwork
    @madaboutwork Год назад +1

    I have used C1 21 so far because I owned Fujifilm cameras XT2 and XT3. Because my XT3 was stolen quite recently, I bought the XT5. However, when I tried to upload the raw files to Capture 1 21, the program didn't upload them, just the jpg. Does anyone know if C1 23 is capable of working the heavier XT5 raw files?

  • @SSCheema
    @SSCheema 5 месяцев назад +1

    I am very very near to junking it myself after a good 10 year plus

  • @FlorianCortese
    @FlorianCortese 2 года назад +8

    Totally agree with you., Gavin. I have a perpetual license and C1 22. I did not get C1 23 because of the reasons you stated. I was not really excited by the upgrade. My thought was to wait for C1 24 and see what it had to offer. Now if you have a perpetual license and don't go subscription you're screwed because essentially there will no longer be any perpetual licenses. I like the levels tool in C1 and use it a lot. But Lr CC is what I use as my DAM and initial editing. I just wish Adobe would come out with a Levels tool. Unless there is something in Lr's develop module I am missing. So for me it looks like C1 22 is my last involvement with C1. I will use it until is becomes obsolete butC1 is not geting any of my hard earned money in the future..

  • @EdHelwig
    @EdHelwig Год назад +5

    As a hobbyist, I will continue to use CO23 until it breaks. However many years that is. I too did not want to pay each month to Adobe. Don't like the subscription model. Never had, never will.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад +1

      While I tend to agree with that sentiment. It means no updates, nor Raw compatibility if you buy a new camera etc. That's why people are leaving C1 for LR. They threw away their biggest advantage and LR is now far cheaper and less hassle.

  • @skyscraperfan
    @skyscraperfan 2 года назад +4

    For me it would be okay to buy the perpetual license for $299 and use it for five years without any feature updates. The problem through are the camera and lens profiles. What if my new camera or lens does not have a profile included in my perpetual license? Will there be an option to get those profiles without having to pay another $299?

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад +1

      I doubt it, they will use that as a hook to make you update again for more or less the same app.

    • @CrisURace
      @CrisURace 9 месяцев назад +1

      this is what i need too. I do not care about "new features" I just want newer bodies to be supported on an older version! They force me to find unofficial sources tbh. Not getting punished for changing my body, sorry...it's disgusting.

  • @DicelaBiblia
    @DicelaBiblia Год назад +1

    Wow! I had no idea. I just bought a fuji camera and my old stand alone perpetual LR6 can't recognize the raw files. So I've been tinkering with the free Capture One for fuji and actually was about to buy a perpetual license when I saw this video. Now I'm reconsidering the LR subscription service as I am already familiar with the workflow and controls. Fornow it's just the free version of Capture One while I figure out if I want to do subscriptions with Adobe or buy a non-updated Capture One.

  • @panagiotispantazidis2572
    @panagiotispantazidis2572 11 месяцев назад

    is (Smart Shooter 5) from tethered tools a solution for us we bought in capture one for its tethered capabilities????

  • @balhzz
    @balhzz Год назад +2

    Thanks for the video... well said. I cannot agree more. I now have huge regret for switching to Capture One 4 years ago.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад +1

      4 years ago they were edging out LR. But they ignored customers and thought they were special instead of improving. But it's not hard to switch back honestly. Sync up the same folder locations and you're good to go.

    • @balhzz
      @balhzz Год назад

      @@Seimstudios Yep, Capture One has grown over confident and they are shooting themselves in the foot. I would be a fool to pay twice (or more) for C1 over LightRoom vs PhotoShop. Although I'm hoping Affinity Photo 2 adds a lightweight "inventory" capability -- personally, much prefer the C1 "Session" style vs one big, huge database of every photo you have run through it... it seems like it wouldn't be a stretch for Affinity Photo to add the session approach... it seems like it would be less work than adding the "one big DB approach". Either way, I really frustrated and disappointed with C1 at this point (and not just this most recent change, but some of the other money grab moves they have made like getting rid of the Sony-specific version for a savings).

    • @insidechocolatewithjimothy5313
      @insidechocolatewithjimothy5313 Год назад

      Yep same here. Upgraded twice and now wondering why

  • @remco2777
    @remco2777 Год назад +5

    You nailed exactly my sentiment. I bought the one-off license for C1 in 2020 after having switched to Fujifilm. I am a hobby photographer and had been using Lightroom 5 for a long time and like it a lot, but was baulking at the Adobe subscription price/model. Even after 2.5 years of C1 I have not warmed up to it and now that they are starting to effectively push their customers also to a subscription model, I might as well return to Lightroom.

    • @kocot.
      @kocot. Месяц назад +1

      im in a similar situation but now with al the time spent on C1 catalog it feels painful to have a second, incompatible in lightroom

    • @remco2777
      @remco2777 Месяц назад

      @@kocot.DxO Photolab 8 looks like a serious alternative. I am just not clear yet on Fujifilm lenses support before pulling the trigger

  • @zoneVgroup
    @zoneVgroup Год назад

    Does Lightroom offer anything such as EIP? Just curious! I have been trying to figure it out.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад +1

      You can save sidecar files out or use DNG's and LR can save setting in them for transport.

    • @zoneVgroup
      @zoneVgroup Год назад

      @@Seimstudios thanks a lot. Will try it out. Just want to make sure setting are the same for the colorist and client to see if Lightroom is use.

  • @jacquesdemers1998
    @jacquesdemers1998 2 года назад +2

    I agree with you completely. I bought the version 23 upgrade and I regret it.

  • @igottheshaft
    @igottheshaft Месяц назад

    What Lightroom Alternative would you recommend for me as a hobbyist photographer?
    I don't like being trapped in an ecosystem, and I hate subscription models. I have a desktop workstation that I built, and I run Linux for the freedom (Ubuntu). I dual boot into Windows for gaming. I have an iPhone, Macbook, and iPad - but I use Gmail and Google Calendar so I am not too tied into Apple. I bought all the Affinity products for both Windows and Mac - so I don't *need* Photoshop. I just need a good replacement for Lightroom that is not on a subscription.
    Right now I am using RawTherapee, because it's open source and I can get it working on any platform. I generally like it, but I get the feeling that I am missing out on features. I was set to buy Capture One, but if I ever upgrade my camera, I won't even get support for new raw formats? That seems bizarre to me. Any ideas?

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Месяц назад +1

      Honestly I still have not found a great option despite doing all these tests. LR or C1 are objectively better than the others. But I keep looking and making videos so stay tuned..

    • @igottheshaft
      @igottheshaft Месяц назад

      @@Seimstudios Thanks for the reply. I'll keep an eye out.

  • @kstrohmeier
    @kstrohmeier 2 года назад +4

    I primarily use Lightroom and bought Capture One licenses largely because I shoot Fuji XT series cameras and I wanted to have that option for tricky photos. Silly me I purchased the early bird upgrade and now they decide to change game to my detriment. Needless to say, I am done with Capture One.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад +1

      Yea it's not actually better for Fuji anyways

  • @ickebins6948
    @ickebins6948 Год назад

    I took a break form photgraphy for 12 years, now got back into it. (Bought a X-T5 and sone accessories).
    I'm looking for some good software and capture one was on the list but thanks to their "customer care" and videos like yours I'm out.
    I don't like subscription models at all. Are there any other alternatives? I'm using darktable at the moment.
    Thanks the video.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      I hear you. No decent current alternatives,. You can use old software like CS6. Things like dark table are options but not even close to LR and while I also don't like subscriptions, at $10/mo for LR and PS, adobe really has the best deal and the best product right now.

  • @markfchapmani
    @markfchapmani Год назад

    Thanks!! Was trying to decide which way to go... just decided!! Lr and Ps it is!!

  • @yannisvaroufakis9395
    @yannisvaroufakis9395 5 месяцев назад

    I have Capture One 21. Not only are there no updates, but it ceased working after I updated my Mac. Capture One won’t support any Mac updates if you don’t but their subscription. So if you pay $300 for their “perpetual” license, you can never update your Mac.

  • @marcisegal1
    @marcisegal1 Год назад

    When I bought my Fuji Xt the salesperson suggested using Capture One. So I got into using it, albeit totally unsuccessfully. I feel disappointed with the complexity of instructions on how to use it and will likely go other places to edit and process my work. So sad. I'm perseverant, though, to a point. Is Adobe LR as complicated to use?

  • @lewlarson6882
    @lewlarson6882 2 года назад +1

    Gavin,
    I am considering moving back to LR. Seems to be an easier workflow when having to composite and blend images when using PS for real estate and automobile shoots. As a fuji user (X-mount), I moved to C1 after initially using LR . I was curious if you have a recommendation of moving files from C1 catalog back to LR? Thank you!

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад

      I would just leave the folder and saves right where they are and import the same folder structure back to Lightroom. I know of no way to bring your develop setting. They are distinctly diffident beasts.

  • @chadh6815
    @chadh6815 Год назад +4

    I was already pissed at C1 even before this. Years ago I bought C1 because I didn't like the SAS model Adobe uses. But I kind of got screwed, bought it right before the cutoff for the upgrade to the new version. After that I paid for a couple new versions despite very few features. I also started having some issues. I keep my RAW images on my NAS, I thought the whole point of C1's database was that you could edit your files from your locally stored database. But whenever I open my catalog of 6000+ images it would take 30 minutes to generate the thumbnails every single time (because it was looking at the files on the NAS instead of the ones in the local cache folder) Contacted support who told me to try a couple things (I had told them i'd already tried) then pretty much ignored me.
    Then I upgraded my camera from a Sony A7III to A7IV and the RAW files wouldn't open. I don't think it's too much to ask to have a modular patch you can apply to previous versions to support a new camera. Especially when I saw people who said if you edit the EXIF data so it thinks its an A7III the files opened with no issues. I didn't really want to go that route. But now they want another $200 for minimal new features just so I can open files from a new camera. I'd already paid hundreds for minimum new features just to stay current. Did the math and it would have been cheaper for me to just go with an Adobe subscription even skipping a year or 2 of upgrades. $200/year for C1 with crappy support, broken features vs $120 a year for Lightroom which also comes with Photoshop, a great mobile version of LR (I think I've heard C1 is releasing an app - iOS only, and making you pay for that separately) and 20GB of cloud storage.
    Generally I like to support companies that offer perpetual licenses, I have a Davinci Resolve Studio license (even though I probably could make due with the free one) and I have Affinity Photo which is also a great app. They both seem to have really customer friendly licensing terms and are great non SAS options. But I'll happily subscribe to the Adobe photo plan over buying C1, whose 'perpetual' license seem to be in name only to lure people in then price gouge them worse than Adobe.

  • @boyztoyz121
    @boyztoyz121 Год назад

    I bought a perpetual licence for C1 22. Still hacks me off that I have to validate the install every so often as I may not always be working online. I'm not interested in new features but would like to get profiles for new lenses and bodies. Will this be possible with a legacy perpetual licence? If not I'm ditching C1 and writing off the previous losses on the (effectively) useless perpetual licence.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      My understanding is they will give you NOTHING of any updates unless you pay again.

    • @boyztoyz121
      @boyztoyz121 Год назад

      Well, they've just lost my business. I have On1 and Affinity too. I'm finding these to be great (but On1 is painfully slow) @@Seimstudios

  • @IanCassanova
    @IanCassanova 2 года назад +4

    I was also pondering buying a new license over Black Friday, I am glad I didn’t now. If I want a subscription based product I may as well stick with LR.

  • @donaldbaker3272
    @donaldbaker3272 Год назад +3

    As a subscriber to full Adobe products, I'm always looking to up my game. When Capture One originally came out for my Hasselblad, it appeared to be an interesting software but just for medium format. Fast forward, I decided to take another look. When I saw that they had gone to subscription, I knew that the jig was up. I don't have a problem with subscription software, as long as the updates are free and frequent but not in your face ripoffs. This has now happened to Portrait Pro as well. Although they are not subscription (yet), they still have these annual upgrades that provide little to no creative updates worth paying for. This was the problem with Windows platforms for decades. They would fall short on a fix for software that THEY created, then charged for an update that should have been free. As a Mac user we never pay for upgrades, just hardware. I know it's expensive but at least they are consistent with fixes. Capture One could learn a thing or two from Apple. Charge a fair premium price, with FREE updates.

    • @kocot.
      @kocot. Месяц назад

      I dont think the point about Windows is fair, most windows updates were pretty massive, and microsoft backwards compatibility is really hard to beat (it's also what dragged them behind for ages), they keep updating old OS and applications far after they announced the end of support, there were usually also several SPs and UI updates bringing new stuff and responding to user feedback (e.g. when windows 8 ended up being too extreme change). Now C1 mixes up UI a bit, calls it a new version and your support is over.

  • @JanGodrie
    @JanGodrie 2 года назад +2

    Avid has done a similar thing a few years ago with their perpetual license model but in a different way.
    I have a perpetual Pro Tools Studio license, which costs €595, and that license comes with a 1 year update and support plan and a free plug-in pack. So during that year I get all the new features and bug fixes, no matter to which version they go.
    After that year I have the choice, I either renew my update and support plan for one year which costs €209, that's 35% of the perpetual license which is fair in my book.
    If I don't renew, i still have a 2 months grace period where in can renew for €209. If I want to get updates and support and the plug-in pack after that grace period I will need to buy a reinstatement instead of a renewal which costs €299 which is about 50% of the perpetual license and you can at least skip 2 years and probably even more since the reinstatement is also valid for Pro Tools 12 which was released back in 2015.
    Now, if Capture One was to come up with a similar way of doing their perpetual license going into the future, I think that would be a better move than to cut off updates to new features each X.X version release.
    Doing this, the Avid way, on a per year basis with a renewal and past a year with some sort of reinstatement fee would make way more sense and they would be able to sell this license model much better IMHO.
    That being said, I'm curious as what will be in their statement in February 2023 regarding the loyalty scheme they mentioned. But, it was dumb of them not to include this information in their initial statement because that is the exact info all perpetual license owners are missing and it would have made world of difference if they just had included it.
    I think this can mean two things. Either they will be gauging user's responses and base a plan of of that to somehow try to salvage as much of this pickle as possible or the loyalty scheme pricing will be ludicrous that they would actually still be forcing everybody towards the subscription model.
    Only time will tell but I do hope that they turn this around and somehow take the route Avid did, I think would be a good solution to the problem.

  • @Gerlae81
    @Gerlae81 6 месяцев назад

    As a Hobbyist, I think that the one time payment is a great way to sale a product. If Adobe did a model like that people would buy the one time purchase before spending on a subscription... I would as a designer/photo hobbyist...

  • @pkh540
    @pkh540 27 дней назад

    agreed… just bought a new MBP and now I gotta upgrade CO too? @$299! Left Adobe over subscriptions and now CO is doing the same. Not sure what I’m gonna do but $9.99/mo. is more attractive than $299 for damn sure.

  • @SachinThakur66
    @SachinThakur66 11 месяцев назад

    I am at the cusp of being a professional. In 2021 when I bought the perpetual license it was because of the price, and the perpetual license. If I had an option to upgrade to 22 perpetual 'at a decent price', I would have. But the price just seemed to be prohibitive. Subscription would cost the same for the year. And therefore, I skipped 22 and bought 23 at a discounted price. At that point, 23 was cheaper than what 22 had been. And now the 24 subscription is comparable to the 21 subscription. It is a bit more expensive, but marginally. The only reason I stuck with CO is because I have got used to the workflow and editing. It is a bit like whether you would buy a Toyota or a Honda. None is better than the other, I guess. If the Capture One cost had still been prohibitive, I would have switched to Adobe.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  11 месяцев назад

      I hear you. Though its good to switch somethings and it keeps your editing brain flexible. LR is not that much different to use.

  • @kel1ng
    @kel1ng Год назад +1

    Yes, you will need capture one 23 if you just bought a camera body that was just newly released. Maybe Capture one has predicted that there would be a boom in new camera models end of last year and this year....that is why capture one 23's upgrading is so incremental

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      I think most won't, since they are leaving Capture one and going back to LR. Phase One had their chance and they blew it.

  • @fredbakhuis7977
    @fredbakhuis7977 9 месяцев назад

    As a Sony user I basicly lost my perpetual version of Capture One unless I switch to a new perpetual version that per customer service person R. will not support Sony in RAW conversion. Fuji only seems to be the (new?) strategy. Perpetual is the key word here. What is going on?

    • @fredbakhuis7977
      @fredbakhuis7977 9 месяцев назад

      All seems resolved. I retain my license an need not ask the EU fair consumer rights devision for guidance as promised. All is well that ends well.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  9 месяцев назад

      NOt really though. In the end they will find a way to make you pay. It's what Phase One does.

  • @IQof2
    @IQof2 Год назад +1

    Could you discuss Photolab 7?

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Hopefully I can compare that in 2024 reviews

  • @AliSatchu
    @AliSatchu 2 года назад +10

    I was so annoyed. I upgraded before Black Friday 5 weeks prior when they let the 22 ones update for a special intro price. I ended up paying more that Black Friday price for my loyalty. Had upgraded from 20 to 21 to 22 more so to support an alternative to LR. Also, before I complained about that I went ahead and bought all their styles to show my support and after that said look already bought your styles to at Black Friday 50% off but not happy that you charged me more as a loyal customer just 5 weeks ago and now Black Friday is much cheaper. Their response was a terrible “boiler plate” we can’t offer prices to everyone otherwise we’d be discounting all the time for everyone. Oh god… what a way to keep a very loyal customer and someone who doesn’t need upgrades but does it to support you happy. I am annoyed!!!!!

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад +3

      They are out of touch and its sad to seem them falling when they had so much potential. They have bad leadership. Remember if you use any of my style packs (which are way better then then the official ones) they include both LR and C1 versions so you don't have to worry about a switch.
      I hear you. We need more competition in this area.

  • @cbimage
    @cbimage Год назад +2

    I've just bought v23, having been tempted by the discount. I'll wait to see what C1 does to answer the criticisms over the next few months, but I'm actively looking for a replacement (that isn't Adobe :-)).

  • @greysuit17
    @greysuit17 6 месяцев назад +1

    So both companies treat their customers like crap

  • @derekjohnson435
    @derekjohnson435 2 года назад

    I've been using C1 for 5+ years.. I just switched from Nikon to Sony and am confused by what I need to do in order to get the Sony license key.. My (Nikon) subscription just renewed this past week ($103) for another year. Do I now need to purchase an annual subscription at $176/yr?!

    • @UpTheClock
      @UpTheClock 2 года назад

      From C1 22 pro, all camera makes are now included.

  • @dayworkhard
    @dayworkhard Год назад +1

    i bought captureone 22 pro, no need to upgrade to 23 pro. I don't want to subscribe. But lightroom is really amazing.

  • @MrOzphoto
    @MrOzphoto 9 месяцев назад +1

    The price now for me is $420 less 20% and its a joke. B+H had it for half the price until C1 called B+H to up the price. The perp plan is a way to get people frustrated and hope they go sub. You are right Adobe is cheaper and includes PS. For a C1 perp user this discount is a joke with real no innovation. C1 has really pissed of its users. So I now plan to continue using C1 16.2 while I trial other software and decide what to do. However as a perp user I always upgraded C1 for many years. C1 is punishing its perp users. Then other thing is if you go sub you lose your perp license! Sub users are flying first class but at a high price while the rest of us are in cargo being jerked around and punished. IMO in time they will kill the perp license.

  • @Xero_Wolf
    @Xero_Wolf Год назад +2

    Been with Capture One since 2016 but last year when they announced their new subscription/upgrade model I was like damn it's time to switch. When I've got software like Davinci Resolve Studio where I only pay once and the Affinity products where you only pay for a major upgrade once ever 4 to 5 years the Capture One model just look flat out greedy to me. As a creator there are so many products you have to use depending on, in your workflow and the thought of having to pay a monthly or yearly subscription for all of them is just insane to me.

  • @MartinDoyler
    @MartinDoyler Год назад

    Very Interesting IM NOT A GREAT TECH PERSON, i used lightroom for developing pictures from my fuji cameras and I used to be annoyed at the worms on the raw files so I got capture one which did give better results, After seeing your video I will have to take a closer look before I pay the 2023 subscription to capture one , Thank you

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад +1

      Ya I have another video about the worms. They really are not an issue anymore in LR.

  • @Kev5565
    @Kev5565 2 года назад

    Im just curious Is there any open source software to compete

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад

      There's is, but it doe snot really complete sadly from what I have seen

  • @smoothlennie
    @smoothlennie 11 месяцев назад +1

    I agree. Phase One's pricing has become so geared towards its professional main market that as a retiree I can no longer entertain upgrades. I skipped on V23 and I continue to enjoy using 22 which with its panorama inclusion meant I could ditch LR. I may well return to LR, especially since your video comments show that the gap has closed. I've been an amateur C1 customer since about 2007.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  11 месяцев назад +1

      Not even that. The profession main market uses Lightroom mostly as it doe most things better now. More are jumping ship on C1 all the time it seems. It's such potential wasted because their their arrogance.

    • @smoothlennie
      @smoothlennie 10 месяцев назад

      Thanks for that insight. @@Seimstudios

  • @charlesputnam6496
    @charlesputnam6496 6 месяцев назад +1

    I'm finding Capture One uses a LOT less system resources than Lr/LrC/Photoshop, and it's a LOT more stable. I've paired it with ON1 Photo Raw 2024

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  6 месяцев назад

      I think thats fair. But LR has a lot more layer and process tools so in part in that. But C1 in general is more stable. Not sure why you would ne ON1 and C1 since they arce both RAw editors. What you lack in that mix is a pixel layer editor.

  • @dallastuttle3851
    @dallastuttle3851 Год назад +1

    I run perpetual licensing on c1. I hate adobe’s business model and it’s a terrible company. I work in IT and they’re HORRIBLE to deal with.
    I just don’t upgrade every year. I’ve had C1 20 Fuji only license for like 3 years and I might upgrade next year. So I’ve paid something like 4-5 dollars a month by the time I upgrade.
    No big deal. I think my output is worthy of charging for considering what I do with it. Overall decently happy that I’m not giving Adobe any more money at the moment.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      The problem is Phase One just became worse than adobe. Not sure you read the fine print. You no longer get updates even for a year with your perpetual license. You have to pay again every time a new feature comes out of you want it.

    • @dallastuttle3851
      @dallastuttle3851 Год назад

      @@Seimstudios yeah - I just don't care about the updates. Which has made it a very capable and extremely cheap option. I don't early adopt much of anything and I can live with limited features for prolonged periods of time without really impacting my work much at all.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      @@dallastuttle3851 That's fair

  • @stevenmichael7004
    @stevenmichael7004 Год назад

    Very valuable thread. Was a convert from Canon to Fuji, so grabbed the free C1 version. Then bit on the black Friday deal and signed up for the subscription. Here's the thing, I'm newly returning to photography and editing is new ground. I wanted to avoid Adobe for many "historic" reasons, but mainly because I hate subscription models (and I worked in the software industry). So, now, with all the good feedback on this video, the question begs should I pay for a LR/PS monthly subscription and learn the tools that appear to be a standard? Or keep learning C1 and see what they do in February? Side note, I use FastRaw Viewer for culling, which I like. Thanks! Newbie Steve

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      I hear you. But Capture One no longer has the subscription free advantage since you pay more and get less.

  • @KipVaughan
    @KipVaughan Год назад +1

    The real comparison to me is Affinity Suite which you can also get for about $180 and that is for Mac, Windows and iPad! I wanted to stick with Capture One but Affinity Photo is the more important tool so until they make some MAJOR changes to the licensing and features before the 2024 version I am sadly going to have to leave it behind. It just isn't as important as Affinity.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Sadly Affinity is not a comparison to either C1 or LR. Affinity is a layer editing like Photoshop and while it;'s a good app for the money, it does not replace a RAW style editing like LR. If you think you'll be able to replace C1 with only affinity I think you'll be disappointed.

    • @KipVaughan
      @KipVaughan Год назад

      @@Seimstudios It does most of what I use C1 for. Capture One is a great tool at a lot of things but its lack of object layers makes it the least important of the two tools in my workflow.
      I've never liked LR so it doesn't make sense for me to compare that product. I always needed to do further touch up in PS which to me defeats the whole point of DAM tool.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      @@KipVaughan It's a good app and if it works great. But it's not a comparison. You're comparing a Photoshop Like app to a LR like app and the two are fundamentally different. If you are a slow 1 at a time image editor that's fine. But it's not a workflow solution and can't replace LR or C1 in a practical way. Affinity competes with Photoshop.

    • @KipVaughan
      @KipVaughan Год назад

      @@Seimstudios For a good amount of the time I was on C1 I had been using it for old film photo scans. For an example one of the features in the lasted version of C1 is that it can do a better job at detecting and correcting spots which is something you do A LOT on film.
      I am just trying to make the point that there are a many reasons why someone might use C1 and batch editing may not even be some ones reason. Another reason I used C1 for that it allowed me to make sessions rather then the enormous catalog files of LR. That is one of the examples of C1 and LR not really competing with each other because the workflow in that one area is so different.

  • @BenjaminTrillington
    @BenjaminTrillington 11 месяцев назад

    5:55 What do you mean the perpetual license is $300 a year? The definition of perpetual is that it doesnt end. It says it's a one time payment.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  11 месяцев назад

      It's not really perpetual. You get a license that keeps working bit you get no updates unless you pay again.

    • @BenjaminTrillington
      @BenjaminTrillington 11 месяцев назад

      @@Seimstudios that's trash. This is part of the reason I switched to davinci and why I'm glad other creators are too.

  • @hankblack783
    @hankblack783 Год назад

    I bought Capture One perpetual license this Black Friday and it has since been upgraded. I got the upgrade at no additional cost I love Capture One and its layers. Had Lightroom and Photoshop before they went to subscription BTW, Adobe subscription for LR + PS is now $20/month - not $10/month. Maybe your rant was legit for a year ago, but I much prefer Capture One and it's pricing.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Don't worry you won't keep getting updates. Capture One are very clear on that and they are losing market share for screwing over so many users. Alsothe LR/PS basic bundle is still $0 a month, far cheaper than C1, especially since you still need Photoshop, or something like it to edit equally. Capture One is only the raw editor.
      Capture one has a few advantages but LR has a lot more. I would love to see Capture One start listening and pick up their game. Come back in a year and let me know how it went. That said in the use, use what works for you. They are just tools. Buying a Leica is also not practical, but if you love it and its;' what inspires, enjoy.

    • @kocot.
      @kocot. Месяц назад

      PS+LR still 9.99, you pay 20 if you want 1TB cloud on top of it, instead of 20GB. With C1 you get none, so that still stands

  • @jeffkogler1170
    @jeffkogler1170 Год назад +1

    Learning and using Capture One has gone on hold with me (I am not a professional photographer but have CO 23) until the future price/value impacts become clearer. I like the interface especially more than any other program I have used but the price has always been problematic.

  • @ZeLoShady
    @ZeLoShady Год назад

    Looking forward to a video about the recent changes. I hated the ones talked about in this video but the one done today is far, far worse.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Wow just saw. People have licenses to this regardless of whether they were free. To simply make their software stop working is insanity

    • @ZeLoShady
      @ZeLoShady Год назад

      @@Seimstudios Ya it's a crazy thing to do. They haven't even posted on their socials about it. Just email and forum.

  • @rgreeneish
    @rgreeneish Год назад

    I’m also worried if I stop paying capture one if they will disable my program somehow so I can’t get into my photos anymore. I do know if you have more than one computer if you upgrade one to the newest version it disables your other ones.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      The original photos will still exists on your drive and be fine. But you won't be able to open and see your edits.

  • @belisarioroldanstudio
    @belisarioroldanstudio Год назад

    I understand when a company needs new strategies but I don't agree when that harm customers.
    Current users with perpetual licenses should be able to purchase upgrades and offer just subscription for future users.

  • @christo256
    @christo256 Год назад +1

    I agree completely, Capture One is ripping off its loyal customers! I have been using Capture One since about 2003 and have owned two Phase One digital backs and they have always been a bit of a rip off but this new subscription pricing is just plain greedy. Back in about 2009 I had my then P31 digital back serviced and it cost a whopping 3000 UK pounds! That was more than buying most decent DSLR's back then just for a checkover! Always been a rip off company.

  • @rgreeneish
    @rgreeneish Год назад

    I’m seriously thinking of switching back to Lightroom. Years ago, I told them how screwed up their crop tool was and they basically just told me I was using it wrong. I shouldn’t have to click the hand icon every time I want to straighten or crop an image. To make it take effect. And every time I watermark an image, the move watermark hand tool is always turned off. It should default on. Simple usability items that don’t work are just infuriating.

  • @truthsayers8725
    @truthsayers8725 Год назад

    i just got C1 2023. i dont know if i should feel pissed or tricked because im still using LR 5.71. my wife and daughter have the 2 licenses for LR 6 but im trying to get my daughter to give hers back, just to see what's what.
    i dont like the subscription because in the long run it costs way more and if i dont pay, im out of luck. i guess im stuck using Canon's DPP. i dont like that either

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      I hear you. But honestly LR + PS only costs $10/mo. You get years of double the apps for the price of capture one for one year, even if you don't renew every year it's really not way more costly.

  • @johnnydee7480
    @johnnydee7480 2 года назад +1

    I am so glad I didn't upgrade during black Friday. I have a C1 22 pro (p.license). I felt Sony didn’t offer much in C1 23. Wow, you can now change the dates (pff). I’ll only update if they do A. I like Lightroom. But with Sony’s new move, I may leave.

  • @jeffrey3205
    @jeffrey3205 8 месяцев назад

    So the only option left is acdsee

  • @blacksheep7576
    @blacksheep7576 Год назад

    Kinda explains why they can offer a 50% discount for black friday. Non-updating otp is almost as bad as subscription based services

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Worse, because it's just bait to get you to pay more later

  • @Eigil_Skovgaard
    @Eigil_Skovgaard Год назад

    You are totally right. I have been a Capture One owner way back - and tried again a couple of years ago - for a short time. The product is constantly suffering from bugs and bad solutions and the support is not listening. This software was originally developed by dedicated nerds from Copenhagen, who just wanted to create the best, and I was proud of the results for a while. That's in the past. The current management and development feels and looks as if it is executed by gold diggers from the Tel Aviv office. Copenhagen is just a nice European brand. Respect and dialog has become unimportant for this new Capture One management. 'We know better' is the mantra, while time passes without real improvements, and still - Capture One now need our regular payments. Must be frustrating for the fan boys, but can't come as a surprise considering that Capture One for too long has fooled its customers with 'exciting new features' that are everything but exciting or new.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      You about nailed it. The brand model of Capture One is arrogance.

  • @arfmf
    @arfmf Год назад

    They are now deprecating all versions of express. I'll pack my things and move softwares

  • @gtwester
    @gtwester 2 года назад

    As a CaptureOne 22 user I agree that 23 has no features I want EXCEPT support for the Sony A7RV. They won't even update camera support on older versions so I basically would have to pay $199 just to be able to view/edit files for my new camera.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад

      Ya it sucks. To be fair LR does that also when it comes to new cameras. It's the new camera tax no one talks about.

    • @gtwester
      @gtwester 2 года назад

      @@Seimstudios But you can't get LR without a subscription right?

    • @KangasAri
      @KangasAri 2 года назад

      @@Seimstudios LR doesn't have perpetual licenses so no, that doesn't apply. They may take their time providing support for new models but as you're in the SaaS hell anyway you don't pay anything extra for it.

  • @4Kandlez
    @4Kandlez 2 года назад +2

    Nice move waiting till after C1 23 is released getting in that early adoption revenue, then dropping the blackmail note, I don't feel cheated at all

  • @VespaManInKorea
    @VespaManInKorea Год назад

    I don't get those fanboys enjoying getting screwed. But can't win over unreasonable ppl anyway. I have to use LR and CO together, so I appreciate all this info for me to make right decisions for my business.

  • @ironchefboyardeee
    @ironchefboyardeee Год назад

    Why is a perpetual license $25 per month? It’s perpetual, so doesn’t it become cheaper per month as you keep using it, if you don’t feel like upgrading? You said it would continue to receive bug updates. Unless you’re a pro do you need all the latest features?

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      You can get perpetual for $299 without monthly. And it appears to have bug updates for a year only. No Raw compatibility updates etc. In the end LR+PS will give you more for less even if you're juts doing it for fun.

  • @martinekwall4671
    @martinekwall4671 Год назад

    I agree with you that the upgrades of a year should be included in the in the first year of one perpetual license. The cost of a raw converter as working photographer is peanuts compared to all the other costs and I can't complain on that, maybe for hobby its a lot with 200-400 per year on software. Do you guys remember in the past what we had to pay for Adobe PS 500-700 usd for just that itteration. The whole Adobe suite for 2500usd. It's a lot easier these days. I think if I was a hobbyist I would get C1 one perpetual license and use it for 2-3 years. Version 23 is very good for years to come pair it with PS or Affinity or some other AI post work suite, What's there to miss, really.

  • @maggnet4829
    @maggnet4829 2 года назад +1

    You are spot on unfortunately. Like many others I just got Capture One, for the reason that I despise the abbonement model that Adobe is running and to support some competition and now I have the same shit here even worse.

  • @desotopete
    @desotopete 2 года назад

    Is there any open source that remotely compares?

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад

      Not really. But there are others like OnOne

    • @feilong6223
      @feilong6223 2 года назад

      There is Darktable but there is a bit of a learning curve.

  • @SailingSVPixiefish
    @SailingSVPixiefish Год назад

    It's like the child who asks for his allowance on Monday and by Wednesday their asking again.

  • @AnoshterHaar
    @AnoshterHaar Год назад +1

    Ah Capture one pulled a Filmora... Well we all know how that ended.....

  • @vincentkeith5259
    @vincentkeith5259 2 года назад +11

    Yeah, I'm struggling with this right now. I took a break from photography for a few years (life happens) - a small part of that was my absolute frustration with Adobe subscriptions demanding the ability to leech onto my bank account and hold my work for ransom. I was using an old version of Capture One - and at the time, it was great with raw files, but overall processing - just didn't compare to Lightroom. Still, I had the license, so I made it work and just stuck with my CS6 version of Photoshop since I own it. Fast forward to now. My ancient Apple is dying, and with it, my access to CS6 and my ancient version of Lightroom. No choice left - have to pick one.
    So Adobe, who I despise for popularizing this "You don't OWN anything and if you can't pay up - screw yourself and your images" Or -
    $300 bucks for a Capture One license with nothing but the discount on the next huge payout that still doesn't match the subscription price and gets you less. Or - You don't OWN anything, and if you can't pay up - screw yourself and your images. Sounds vaguely familiar.
    Clearly - they want the Perpetual license gone. They want that predictable monthly cash flow - I get it. But If they're not going to differentiate on price & features, and they're going to make a perpetual license cost more than a subscription - why would anyone give up on Adobe for less of the same at a higher price.

    • @olafweyer859
      @olafweyer859 2 года назад +8

      "They want that predictable monthly cash flow" and not free market capitalism (I feel compelled to add). You're supposed to win your customers over, not hold them hostage.

    • @gandolfred
      @gandolfred 2 года назад

      In such a situation, these greedy corporations understand only the language of financial losses. Customers had to not compromise and simply refuse to pay Adobe. And then the market would force them to reconsider their greedy policy in order to survive. But people are like a herd of rams - they were sent for a subscription and they slavishly agreed. So this pattern continues. 😎

  • @chrisburgess9919
    @chrisburgess9919 2 года назад +4

    Agree with you completely. I recently bought into the fuji system which I love and moved from Adobe to Capture One. I'll give C1 until Feb to see what they have to offer with their loyalty scheme but I envisage I'll be switching back to Adobe. While C1 undoubtedly handles RAF files better than LR, I don't find the 'worming' issue in Lr to be too bad.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад +4

      Honestly I find LR now handles the files and worms just as well as C1. But we'll do a full review in the new year.

    • @titanphotography566
      @titanphotography566 Год назад

      @@Seimstudios I still see the worming from my last wedding thats why I moved to capture one. settings is not accurate but from memory its bright enough not to use flash indoor, using 300iso. i cant remember the exact iso but wormings was bad at low iso underexposed no flash.

  • @pimhoff
    @pimhoff 2 года назад +1

    Not a little bit of a problem. They have turned off a large part of their customer base.

    • @humansrants1694
      @humansrants1694 2 года назад

      According to Caputure One devs two thirds of their users are already on sub. I cannot believe them.

  • @benyyz
    @benyyz 2 года назад +2

    I am disappointed that Capture One is messing around with Perpetual License holders. I switch from Lightroom to CO to move away from Creative Cloud and Subscription and now after supporting Capture One for V20, V21, and V22, I feel very betrayed by Capture One. We'll see what they "loyalty scheme" is in February, but I have doubts that it's anything to be excited about. V23 is a very lacklustre upgrade from V22.

  • @humansrants1694
    @humansrants1694 2 года назад

    They are not getting rid of perpetual users but they have been placed near a funnel. I was starting to think the same should I go sub it's cheaper but then the same amount of sub gets me Lightroom and photoshop.

  • @grahamsmith7938
    @grahamsmith7938 2 года назад

    Although it all sounds overly complicated to me, C1 have said nothing about getting rid of perpetual licenses (at least not for now), and they have said that for those who want to continue with perpetual licenses there will be no increase in costs over the current perpetual license cost.
    The "annual" new versions will be dropped so no more year based naming system, and they will revert back to version numbers (currently release 16). Throughout the life of a version, perpetual license holders will get bug fixes but no new features added, Subscribers will get bug fixes and new features.
    When the next version is released (release 17) perpetual license holders will be able to update to release 17, and get all the new features that were added during the life of V16. If you have perpetual license bought before February 2023 (V23/release 16) you will get all the new features until end of September 2023. These new versions won't be tied to an annual cycle.
    Currently if you miss two version upgrades you will need to pay the full price again, but with this new scheme it looks as if missing a single upgrade will force you into paying full price again. I am guessing the announced "loyalty" programme, will be some sort of lower cost option if you agree to upgrade at every release.
    Unfortunately, its even more complicated than the above and it looks as if, while displeasing many, they are actually "trying" to please everyone.
    They have a support page about the licensing which is being regularly updated, and for those concerned it's worth checking out.
    support.captureone.com/hc/en-us/articles/7998068628637?page=9#comments

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад

      I mean. When you get less for the same price, that's a price increase.

    • @grahamsmith7938
      @grahamsmith7938 2 года назад

      @@Seimstudios Yes, you could look at it this way.

  • @JeremiahTrue
    @JeremiahTrue 3 месяца назад

    I've been eyeing C1 for years after Adobe went subscription and I had the chance to use it at work several times. This new model is really unappealing to me a year in. I'm still on Adobe but decided to look into current C1 pricing and based on what I read, this video, and some other sources, it hasn't gotten much better. I'd like to ditch adobe for a perpetual license somewhere but C1 doesn't look like the path for me.

  • @class_a
    @class_a 2 года назад +2

    I think claiming that Capture One is "screwing over" perpetual licence holders is an exaggeration. In the future perpetual license holders will receive significantly fewer bug fixes -- which is a problem since bugs are not exactly a non-issue in C1 -- and updates will likely become more expensive. I reckon given how frequent major releases will be and how underwhelming new features have been for a while now, it will become difficult by demonstrating any "loyalty" that Capture One will reward with discounts. That's not good, but not exactly "screwing over" customers, AFAC. In my view, it is worse that Capture One has seemed to have lost the plot regarding product design. Not only are they not fixing longstanding bugs and are not listening to popular feature requests and are instead introducing extensions they believe will open up new customer markets, they actually made the UI worse a number of times. In one instance, the backlash by users was so intense that they back-pedalled and restored the previous design but the very fact that they implemented the worse version demonstrates that someone at Capture One does not know what they are doing. Sadly, the same mistake (modal dialogue) was repeated for the latest "culling feature". A lot of missed opportunities for Capture One which is a real shame because the software has a number of very nice features and was on a great trajectory around version C1 9. Somewhere around version C1 12, it all went downhill, AFAIC. Some glimpses of good feature additions / fixes since then but mostly changes / additions that either mean nothing for my style of photography or made using C1 worse. Unfortunately, in parallel, upgrade pricing became ridiculously expensive after a number of substantial price hikes to the upgrade prices.

    • @KangasAri
      @KangasAri 2 года назад +1

      1) perpetual license owners no longer get even a full year of updates, only up to the next version they decide to release, whenever that may be - and they are strongly suggesting it will be more often than once year. Already the said with 23 you'll get updates only for 9 months. Nothing is stopping them from changing versions even faster in the future.
      2) the upgrade price has more than doubled from my last time. Also, if I wanted to "upgrade" my perpetual license to a subscription I would get a discount of .... 0e? Buying a new subscription costs exactly the same as does that "upgrade".
      If I buy a new license I expect to get updates for it at least for a year. Not 9 months or less. But even if they "only" released a new version every 9 months the perpetual license is still so much more expensive if you were to buy every version. And at least for me (a v20 owner) the upgrade prices were just ridiculous. Photography is just a hobby for me and I make no money out of it. C1's new licensing scheme means I will have to look elsewhere for tools. I moved out from LR long time ago to escape SaaS hell, but if SaaS is the only option, I'll rather take LR+PS for less money than just the C1. I'm going to miss it, but I just can't afford it. And I'm not sure v20 will work well with Ventura, not to mention the next one after that, and I rather move before I find out I'm totally screwed.

    • @aptfx
      @aptfx Год назад

      The upgrade prices got bigger and bigger and now there isn't even an upgrade price anymore... it's essentially buying a completely new utterly expensive license. Then they announced they finally will release an iPad app, but it is subscription only and you will need at least a v23 which you now have to buy either full price or a subscription that is extremely expensive for just one program. They made it impossible to further use the workflow photographers are used to for many years... this is IMHO very clearly "screwing over" the old customers.

  • @b3arodactyl
    @b3arodactyl 2 года назад

    Lightroom classic makes me want to tear my hair out every single time I use it, downloaded c1 trial the other day to test it but it seems like it’s not worth it. Hate that LrC will save to the wrong drive randomly, terrible search features, laggy af, bad ui. Wish Lr would add the calibration panel from LrC cuz then it would be fully featured

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад +1

      If you dail it in and make a good drive plan etc it does get smother.
      Put your catalog and previews on a fast SSD. Then ref all the orginal images from one master drive.

  • @TheLDunn1
    @TheLDunn1 2 года назад +2

    You are right I think.
    Some years ago, I bought the expensive Adobe CS5.5 suite, around 18 months later they announced their subscription only model, which I was (& still am) determined not to sign up to. I continued to use CS5.5 for as long as possible, but a new camera purchase resulted in files not opening in my old CS5.5 version of PS (I subsequent found a work around), and I switched to C1 (perpetual) for the majority of my photo editing (onky going into my old PS to do things I can’t do in C1).
    The thing that has made me unhappy with C1 has been when more recent newer versions have arrived that as an existing owner/user, I got a discount to upgrade to lates version, but this discount over the years has been watered down so much to the point where special offers for new users have even been cheaper (I think I may even have upgraded that way once, essentially buying a totally new second version). Frankly, it’s an insult to existing loyal customers.
    There have been odd years where the upgrade has been minimal in terms of new features, or, at least, I’ve not felt I wanted or needed them. When they introduced layers for the first time, that was a biggie for me, and, from memory, when they subsequently added luminosity masks (I think those two were introduced separately), both were no brainers for me to upgrade to. More recently, they introduced panorama stitching, so I upgraded to that….but here’s the thing, when I tried it, my results were poor, I got much better from my old version of PS….granted, maybe I’ve missed a setting or something in the tool, which then failed to make certain corrections to the image, but the results were not good (I should go back and investigate further sometime).
    So, now I hear that ‘23 doesn’t add anything worth while over ‘22, & from memory, they want £180 from me to upgrade to it, AND now they are screwing folk who prefer perpetual licenses.
    I can see that they may well lose me as a customer, I’m not going back to Adobe, out of principle, & once I leave C1, I will probably feel the same way about them too, I won’t go back once I feel a company has done the dirty on me.
    So, maybe now is the time for me to start looking at cheaper (or even free) alternatives to the big two, while I have the time to and am not painted into a corner. The writing feels like it’s on the wall now….

  • @fanjan7527
    @fanjan7527 2 года назад +1

    The longer I have been on C1, the harder it is becoming for me to justify it, even though I am on a continued special reduction on $11/m (some Black Friday special). I use Affinity Photo as a PS replacement cause I own the software. I might start looking into Adobe/C1 alternatives.
    The other day it annoyed me with C1 that I had to re-link my account, it reminded me that if I don't pay C1, I can't use my images. C1 for what it offers, should be about two thirds the price of Adobes' LR & PS subscription.

    • @rgreeneish
      @rgreeneish Год назад +1

      I’m worried about this also. If I don’t pay them will they hold my photos ransom? Disable my program and keep me from accessing my own photos.

  • @jerrydean648
    @jerrydean648 2 года назад

    This video is all based on your speculation on what Capture may or may not do. Maybe wait until February and see what they are actual saying and doing.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад

      No it's based on what Capture ONe said and what they are doing. Though they may very well backtrack because they are catching so much flack/

    • @jerrydean648
      @jerrydean648 2 года назад

      @@Seimstudios ruclips.net/video/nZG1ExcHH_Q/видео.html

    • @bonespro
      @bonespro Год назад

      Well it's March :)

  • @cevisuals
    @cevisuals 10 месяцев назад

    user since C1 v7 Express whiuch introduced me to the program, To say I'm pissed is an understatement. I'm seriously considering an Intel based MAC so that I can use my legacy copies of LR6/PS6 even though I have maxed out MAC Mini M1, iPad Pro and Macbook AIR M1 just because of C1's screwing it's dedicated users as well as Adobe's Ransomware ...C1 can FOAD as far as I'm concerned...

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  10 месяцев назад

      At least adobe is accessible and keeping ahead of C1 in most areas. LR6 is do dated at this point.

  • @orion2250
    @orion2250 10 месяцев назад

    I don’t see myself renting software forever

  • @primotehcko905
    @primotehcko905 Год назад

    This is the type of review i like. Lets celebrate the good, but work on the negative part. I am currently paying for LR+Photoshop, got the “perpetual license” for Luminar Neo w/ the add-ons subscription… purchased DaVinci Resolve Studio (the perpetual license) and I get every single (full) update from Blackmagic Design. I don’t need a hold back from a software, this is not a physical upgrade. Like i have to get the new iPhone every single year 🙃 I see myself as a hobbyist as well, looking fwd to make it my own income later on. But I can’t keep paying for more subscriptions. I change between LRC and Luminar Neo depending on what I am working on… and i can even use Luminar Neo as a plugging with LRC. The main reason i was about to checkout C1 is the whole tethering awesomeness people talk about. I rather get Cascable for my iPad and that’s it. I get good results for what I do with the softwares i have. You saved me that checkout. Does that mean that i own you a coffee? 😅

  • @dallasolsen4412
    @dallasolsen4412 Год назад

    Yes i've just found out i need to pay $500 to avoid paying for the subscrition version, after paying $400 for the original version i bought :(

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Ya they have priced the non subscription out of reality. It's not a practical option.

  • @sam7479
    @sam7479 2 года назад +4

    It’s one of the most poorly conceived and poorly communicated ideas in product history.

  • @thewackyhacker
    @thewackyhacker Год назад +1

    Wow, a lot of melodrama in this video (sorry, but you asked us what we think). I find the word "punished" more than a tad extreme. Though they've done something cheeky here, here's the hot tip: they still have a "buy and it's yours" version -- Adobe don't. Adobe screwed us so much more harder with their move to a rental model years ago. C1's model isn't perfect, but still way better than Adobe. I will *never* pay to rent software.. I refuse to. I bought something at a version, it's mine. If a company cannot fund/run themselves on that model, they need a rethink.
    So what if their bundle comes with PS? In my 30+ years of shooting, I've never needed it. My firm belief is that if you as a photographer need LR *and* PS, you're shooting wrong. This strong opinion comes from the days of film, where this was a hard and fast rule -- get your shots as right as possible, in-camera.
    LR on your phone? 🤣
    Having been a long-time user of LR, coming to C1 the last few years has been amazing. I find it superior. This is of course personal opinion, but it's mixed in a little with experience back to a time when your "Photoshopping" was done under an enlarger, your hands stank of developer and fixer, and you had to learn to love red light. You also usually only had 24 or 36 goes at it, and each go cost real money.

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Actually C1's new model costs about 2x more than Lr and PS combined. So it's in no way better in any testes I've seen. But if you want to call that melodrama, that's ok with me.

  • @tectorama
    @tectorama 2 года назад

    What exactly is behind Capture one's decision to dump a lot of it's loyal customers ?
    It can't just be for financial reasons. Is there something we are not being told ?

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  2 года назад

      There management seems to have gone totally off the rails

    • @KangasAri
      @KangasAri 2 года назад

      They trust many people will complain but eventually still give in. Or something?
      I'm not, I can't afford the new system.

    • @tectorama
      @tectorama 2 года назад +1

      If they are anything like Adobe, they are making massive profits, but want even more. It's not enough for a company to have a good product and make a reasonable profit. They see themselves as the next Elon Musk.

  • @EElgar1857
    @EElgar1857 Год назад

    The greed of Phase One knows no bounds. I used C1 for years, and was fairly satisfied, but now I'm out. I'll never pay them another penny.
    I know the cost of living in Copenhagen is very high, but their program is not worth $100s of dollars; it's barely worth $50. Wait, I think I've got it:
    their cameras cost $25,000, so the software to use with them should cost $500-1000. What a deal!
    I use Luminar Neo, Affinity Photo, Photomatix Pro, and Graphic Converter - all great products for the price!

  • @Dean_WeAreTheShow
    @Dean_WeAreTheShow Год назад +1

    I “needed” 23 because I skipped 22 and my 21 was apparently not new enough to be compatible with the r5c raw files EXCEPT if you changed the metadata to read R5 instead of r5c because they’re the same damned files… I thought it was adorable that my special upgrade cost they offered for being a loyal customer was MORE than the brand new price when it went on sale…. still leaving a bad taste in my mouth and it’s the last version of their software I’ll ever buy

  • @afargreencountry6324
    @afargreencountry6324 Год назад

    Talked me out of buying C1. The subscription model does not suit my usage.

  • @JayquanDeMarcusWashington
    @JayquanDeMarcusWashington Год назад

    I am big sad. Wish I just went with adobe..

  • @David-k2x7r
    @David-k2x7r 6 месяцев назад

    Thanks for tis video, I was going to move to Capture 1 from my Adobe photography plan but now I think I'll stay put.

  • @EAVO
    @EAVO 2 года назад +1

    \🌚/ it's called 'Old Wine In New Bags'.

  • @rogerhampton2844
    @rogerhampton2844 Год назад

    I watch your videos and wonder how much Adobe pay you?

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Not a dime. They don't even give me review copies anymore because I've hated on Adobe for many years on the podcast for all the bad things they have done. That's why these reviews are so objective tests. I pay for everything we are testing.

  • @ErnieSesameStreet
    @ErnieSesameStreet Год назад

    The frame rate from your video not that smooth whenever you keep moving

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      Ya on these combo streams where I'm doing heavy editing and recording video it sometimes lags. I need a new graphics card.

  • @thedanwriter1
    @thedanwriter1 Год назад

    I still pay 8 monthly

    • @Seimstudios
      @Seimstudios  Год назад

      That's good while it lasts. But you're still paying only $1 less than if you had PS amd LR combined so my the time you add a good pixel editor in you are still paying a lot more.

  • @Omarsalahal-din
    @Omarsalahal-din 2 года назад

    I am a old C1 20 user and was thinking of upgrading to C1 23. But after I read that the news in C1 23 is not worth a upgrade.
    Then I'm a Sony A7R III user.
    After this video there will be no C1 23 but I will go back to LH,
    Why : A) Price 200$ for a upgrade from C1 - 20 to C1 - 23 crazy .... Specially if i won't be able to get new features and fix/bug for less then a year - No thanks Capture ONE
    We customers are not idiot's like you think Capture One.