Unapologetic | "Its A Potential Life" Is A Bad Argument
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 июн 2024
- Before anyone has a stance on abortion, they must answer the question, “when does life begin?”
For pro-lifers, this question is very easy. Life begins at conception! Pro-choicers, on the other hand, have a harder time answering because their opinion is not rooted in science or truth.
We must recognize preborn babies as humans worthy of life and protection.
![NOSFERATU - Official Teaser Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/b59rxDB_JRg/mqdefault.jpg)
Once Germination has occurred, life has begun! As trees go anyway🌞
That's completely false, life began 3.8 billion years ago, it didn't begin twice
@@bulletanarchy6447 ruclips.net/video/ysEc8SdDLAs/видео.htmlsi=UhKXlB9Xofjhl-2d
One of my favourite things is when someone goes to a prochoice rally and asks a group of people their opinion on this. Without fail, the group will realise everybody has a different opinion and will start to bicker amongst themselves.
@@urprobablyabadperson No, we rather see it as being inconsequent.
Also, abortion is the best example of a "forced birth" I can think of. After all, the abortionist forces the baby to come out way too early. The baby is born, one way or another.
@@thejesusfandom < "Abortion is the best example of a "forced birth" [it] can think of .."
See, folks.... It's literally mentally ill and intellectually Incapable of logical reasoning - but it NEEDS to control your body.
What a perverted sickness which ails you... Jesus does not approve. If you read the Bible with comprehension in mind, you'd already know that.
@@urprobablyabadperson Hi! I'd be more than willing to discuss this with you. However, calling me an "it" and otherwise being incredibly rude is not the way I want to do it.
I think we are better than this disrespectfulness, don't you? Let's behave ourselves like polite adults instead of disgruntled children.
@@thejesusfandom I think the fastest solution for you is to be Jesus-like and forgive.
So how is abortion likes forced birth again? Didn't you make that simile previously?
@@urprobablyabadperson Forgiving doesn't mean that I have to put up with your rudeness. Have a good day and God bless!
Good video as usual Autumn, this channel deserves more subs/views!
Absolute BS from start to finish
@@bulletanarchy6447BS - Brilliant Solutions!
SO GOOD AUTUMN!!
Fascists gonna fascist
These videos are great, thank you so much! God bless you!
What total BS
Living women matter more than potential babies - "I don't even know what that means"
hahahahah there are so many woman taking charge in the pro-life movement, stay mad lololol.
Autumn, saying that if it's a potential abortion does nothing is a weak argument
the problem is that "when does life begin" isn't the relevant question, the relevant questions are, do you really want to force a woman to give birth to something that's genetically defective, do you really want to force a rape victim to give birth, do you really want an incest victim to give birth, do you really want to force a pregnant teenager to give birth, do you really want to force someone that doesn't have the means to raise a child to give birth. The morally correct answer to all these is no, but by asking "when does life begin" you're intentionally side-stepping all the really important moral questions, will this be a viable baby if born, will this baby receive the care and support that all human beings deserve.
From the beginning of time everyone has always understood that life begins with a first breath and ends with a last breath, that's why we celebrate birthdays and not conception days. The only thing that medical abortion changes is that abortions are now safe, women no longer have to worry about dying in a non-medically performed (botched) abortion.
The anti-abortionists think they're being well intentioned and moral, but only because they refuse to look at the unintended consequences of what banning abortion really causes, more women will die, and more children will grow up impoverished, that's not the moral outcome we all desire.
So NO, once a sperm and egg meet we do NOT have a new and unique human, all we have is a potential human, it could also end up being not genetically viable, it could end in a miscarriage, and maybe worst of all it could end up being an unwanted and uncared for child. And asking "when does life begin" is the wrong question. And morals aren't rooted in science, so you're again dodging the real relevant moral questions by claiming that pro-choicers opinions aren't rooted in science, of course they aren't rooted in science, they're rooted in morals.
Pro Life - "We studied embryology"
Necromancer - "Yeah sure you did."
Yes it's alive, every cell in my body is alive, some of those cells die sometimes. Death is a part of life, the only good or bad that is caused because of it is when that person is a part of a family or community where people are hurt.
It’s potentialy alive because it’s not totally alive as it’s not contious of its surroundings.
Neither is someone in a coma......or in their sleep for that matter.
@@cynthiarohr9405 postmortem, every single one of the 37 trillion cells of a person's body are still biologically alive for quite some time. yet they as a person are clinically not. just as we don't define life this way, fertilization works from the other direction, because of the concept of viability. meaning fertilization, nor waiting until the last cell ceases to function in a progeny/decedent is not the critera we use to define life and deceased.
Viva la Vida!
(Long live life!)
And yes, I know it’s a title to an absolute banger.
She speaks total BS
Yes exactly it’s a potentially a life but you taking the right of that baby’s future away from it your taking it’s contribution to society away it jog it can bring into the world and what they can offer to it and to me that’s sinful to take that away from someone
I love how all of these aggressive semi-fascists don't have to make any sacrifices for their vision to become a reality. It's laughably pathetic.
If you put 100 pro choice advocates in a room and asked them when life begins, I think 100% of them would say 3.8 billion years ago, if someone in the room actually knows when life begins. 100 pro life advocates would say things like it begins with a flash of light when the sky daddy made the earth and two people, a few thousand years before he parted the red sea.
LOL, best comment yet 🙂 !!!
Great argument, a child's limited vocabulary
90% of all pro life arguments fall flat on their face just by asking if that would also apply to an ovum.
You can't argue that conception is the point of importance and then use an argument that would also be applicable before conception.
I've never heard a single soul talk about "protect the eggs that aren't fertilised and are dying through a period!". What bs is that?
@@bunille No but a living human ovum is human and alive obviously.
Therefore standing there with a stupid look on your fat face saying "Is it alive?" Is not a valid argument.
Critique of video:
Point One: It doesn't apply whatsoever
A seed is fertilized it literally grows from a zygote so you are completely wrong, pollen is the sperm in plants.
Literally identical to a fertilized egg it won't grow into a baby without the correct environment, a womb.
Point Two: The seed will ruin the foundations of the house
Paranoia: Planned parenthood wants women to feel a baby will ruin their life. No it doesn't.
Oh right "You have talked with PP employees" yeah sure you have. What BS
Insinuate the devious nature of PP the non profit organisation.
None of these pro life organisation have any intention of making women feel like they have an option. The irony.
Point Three: A tree is not important, the intrinsic value of human beings
Why are you not pregnant? Surely they are so valuable that you must have as many as possible.
But you advocate abstinence so this is entirely false
A BS statistic about scientists 96% from a completely bogus study made by a pro life advocate.
There absolutely are solid scientific arguments that demolish "Life Begins at Conception"
Life began 3.8 billion years ago and has been an endless relay ever since. It didn't begin twice.
Conception is two living cells joining together, it has an evolutionary function that most pro life don't even believe is a thing.
The bottom line is
This woman literally doesn't know what she is talking about.
Ok, so a devolping fetus is like a random seed on the ground, and humans have the same value trees. Abortion advocate logic at its finest.
@@cynthiarohr9405 No a seed on the ground has separated from the parent.
Nice gaslighting. I thought you were talking about pro-abortionists for a second there. Abortionists don't give anyone the choice. Pro-lifers give you the choice to be a sociopathic narcissist and kill your baby, but they also allow you to weigh two options, how dare they? You hate the youngest women in society, gasligthing and manipulating won't help anyone, you're just miserably coping online. Having empathy for others and using the logical side of your brain would be a good start.
@@bunille I don't consider the unborn to be a baby.
A baby can be separated from the mother. She can be absent without it immediately dying.
Her body can choose to terminate her pregnancy and so can her mind. The process is identical.
Pro life are just manipulative purveyors of religious duplicity.
Wonderful you have your cult to support you and tell you that you can beat my logic.
But deep down you know that you don't even come close.
What's "bogus" is you changing what the young lady said to fit your argument. She referred to a "potential baby" which you changed to "potential life". Dont you think that's disingenuous of you to do that? At conception there is life which has the potential to become a baby. It is not a baby at conception. That is what the young lady said. Why did you feel the need to misquote her? I don't hear most prochoicers using the term potential life, they usually say potential baby or human being because the former is a bad argument but the latter is not.
Well still implying it can be something else, other than a baby. What is this other thing it can be? We're talking about humans here.
@@kouxiong7808 What can an ovum become other than a baby ?
@@bulletanarchy6447 that's what I'm asking. We're on the same side.
@@kouxiong7808 Are we ? Not sure I have a side. I don't have to have a side, to dislike some of the arguments people use.
@@bulletanarchy6447 well that's your problem, not mine.