I believe for these races to be scientific, they need to be done at least 3 times to obtain accuracy as there are so many variables that could affect a car's performance than relying on just one take.
Sure, but I believe you can use 1 lap to determine that, because the signs to a good car is very dependent on how easy it is to access the power, handling overall performance and how quickly the driver can get in tune with the car. Honestly speaking the more you drive a car the more you learn how to use it effectively, and the manufacturers success is partly determined by how much confidence the car gives it's driver from the get go.
You need to do multiple laps as each car is different in the way it delivers power (FWD vs AWD). The driver needs to learn the car to get the fastest time out of it. If he just jumps in and goes he might set a fast time but that's testing how good the driver is. When it comes to tests like this, we need to see how good the car is. Therefore human error needs to be taken out of the equation by doing multiple laps, the driver can then reduce his times by altering his lines, braking areas and adjusting his driving style to suit each specific car. I believe that this would be a more accurate test if this was done. However, we cannot see on film whether they've spent the entire day there and are only showing clips from the fastest runs or whether it's a one time lap. I feel that the driver needs to be more active in the track day videos, giving a description of what the car is like to drive, because In the end, we buy performance cars with out hearts not our heads and need to know what it's like to drive on track (not that many people will track their Golfs)
I do imagine that what you are seeing for the lap is really just the compilation of many laps that the cars did (standard practice in the car review industry). For sure this is a number of laps, and the best overall single result is taken for each car. Had it been a single lap only, the camera would likely have been onboard instead, and the times perhaps slower due to inexperience with the car. :)
really only 1.5 seconds when you consider the slower start from the fwd GTI. On a flying lap, they'll be pretty damn close. with a ecu tune, the GTI will be faster around the track lap to lap than an R, and still cost a hell of a lot less. Only thing the R does better is launch
By that logic, ButWhoWasMoto, you can tune the R too and then it gets an advantage as well. Anyways, these street cars are only going to be taken out for track days, as long as the owner has fun the time should be secondary.
They did the same thing they've done on the MK4 Gti. The Golf 4 was de-tuned while the Audi TT which had the same engine and turbo at the time had its full capacity. so if the R. had its full power it would have done much better. I guess if you want to properly enjoy that extra 100k you have to have an engine remap tune on your golf R to unlock its full potential
3s quicker with a standing start making up a fair bit of that and a dsg box making up the rest. Match gearboxes and do a rolling start and there's pretty much nothing in it.
Do you realise 3 seconds around a 1.30 track is an extremely long time? It's a short track. The GTD being 5 seconds behind the GTI is eternity... thats a massive difference per lap. If you are a second a lap behind someone in motorsports you are getting destroyed.
The R has a lot of more weight. A friend took her TCR for the Nürburgring and was a lot quicker than the R. I really wanna see a stage 1 race / comparison as that's propably what most will want to drive
I would really love to see a lap time on the same day with a BMW 120d just for interest. As the BMW has 20kw more than the GTD and 20nm more than the R
In Australia,VW are importing 150 examples of the GTI Performance Edition1 with 180 kw and 370 nm.The examples also include "a so-called Front Differential Lock - an electronically controlled variable unit capable of zero to 100 percent slip mitigation between the axles - and larger brakes"I dare say,the Golf GTI ED 1 could equal or even beat the Golf R's track time.
You know the part that killed me is "a 100k for 3 seconds?" I always think along those lines too. Hence my preference of a C43 over a C63. The difference in pricing doesn't do justice to the difference in performance between the C63 & C43.
These arnt track cars.....predictable times. These cars are allrounders......Jack of all trades. A car that can be driven easily at its (almost) limit on a daily drive with no scares....and absorb the bumps...is a GOLF.
That is how the car comes. If anything the tire needs to be the same that would make a bigger difference. even in a roll race, the golf R would have been 2 sec quicker than the GTI. I would have got a GTI but I got tired of FWD and wanted awd so I drive a Golf R my next car will be a RWD.
Would be interesting to see the difference around the track if the GTi had a 40bhp remap! Cheaper than buying a golf R and I would guess not much noticeable difference in performance.
there more to the golf R engine to make that 40hp more than just a remap there are different internals and a different turbo two that is why the cars don't have the same engine codes look it up on any VW chat site and also you can look at askdap right here on youtube
is that what the golf R Is? AWD systems are not cheap. even though the Golf R comes with different internals of the engine makes it a batter base for modifications and able to handle more power.
naah dude, it would have been much slower. Remember the clubsport is basically a normal golf with some aero kit. If you'd said Clubsport S, obviously that is a different story, but Clubsport S is horrid on the road for daily use anyway. So it wouldn't really be a fair comparison
I meant the Clubsport. The Clubsport has more power than the normal GTi and is lighter than the Golf R. Golf R is slow on the corners because of the added weight by the drivetrain. And remember the Clubsport in terms of performance matches Honda Civic Type R
Yeah, but I think more than the clubsport having more power than the GTI I would say it's very much dependent on the track as well. This track they are on doesn't have technical challenging corners, cause if it did then the GTI or Clubsport would have it 100%. But this track has more long corners and even straights, so the R can make up for the lost time on the sprints and coming out of corners. Cause I bet you if you did the same test on a track like Kyalami Circuit, GTI would be 1st, R 2nd and GTD will be destined for the same fate obviously. Either way they are all a great choice, I guess it comes down to how big your pockets are.
you've got it backwards Nhlanhla. an all wheel drive car does much better on challenging corners than a rear or front wheel drive. getting out of the corners with a sprint from the AWD system ads on to the advantage
Mazwi Zwane not this awd system the clubsport and gti performance pack handle better than the R. The Halsey system weighs quite a bit more, so the clubsport ruins the R in every aspect. Tuned gti's best the R every time on a roll. R great car for launching that's about it.
So this is me taking a long shot. So I have recently started loving cars, yeah still getting the petrol head status. So I am studying Engineering at Stellenbosch University and seeing as you make car videos around Cape Town I was wondering if I could help out some weekends. You don't need to pay me or anything and I could work with the camera crew since I'm still learning how to use video editing software. I really just want to experience being around some of the cars and hopefully someday own the ones that steal my breath away.
I don't thank so. the GTI does 0-60 in 5.8 seconds, not in 7.5 the golf R does it anywhere from 4.5 to 4.9 depending on what you read. last time I check 4.5 from 6 is not 3 at most 1.5 seconds. I like both but if you plan on moding the car the R is the beater choose because at some point you just can not lay down power in an fwd car and that point daily driving cars is 450 hp and higher
The differences in currency also mean a lot in terms of making a buying decision. 'a hundred grand' he says, but in South African currency, its hard to rationalize if you don't know what you can buy with just one dollar. Here in Canada the Golf R is just over 40k a similarly equipped GTI is just under 40k - so does $1000 CAD equate to 100,000 South African Rand? Checking google currency conversion its about 10,000 Rand. So then 100,000 Rand is $10k CAD or there abouts. Which looking at VW's website is more comparing a base GTI to the R - which to me isn't very fair in terms of making a buying decision. My guess would be South Africa may not have a base model of the R just like we don't here, whereas the US for example does - and that saves about 4k. That would be a better comparison.
you mean more parts in the drive train, not in the transmission. they are going to have the same number of parts. 300 pounds does not make car understeer that much more. understeer is just an issue you have to deal with fwd and AWD cars and even some RWD cars have that issue. now the weight might make the car slower though say a slalom.
Who cares about track performance ? 0.1% of population... In real conditions more important are accelerations from 30-70, 70-120 kmh, and of course fuel consumption. I am also interested in skidpad and lateral g, and balance. Probably GTI has little bit better balance than GTD, less understeering because of lighter engine, but 50% higher fuel consumption. If you buy daily car, what is more important, fuel consumption or understeering ? Also GTD TDI engine has lot more potential for high mileage than GTI TSI. GTI has better exhaust sound, better acceleration and less understeer, but worse fuel consumption....
...because the Imperial system makes no sense and South Africa, like 95% of the world, uses the Metric system. HP and Torque (I assume you mean ft/lbs here) is abnormal.
The GTI is only 3 sec slower (lap), considering a 70 lap race. YOUR ONLY 2.5 LAPS BEHIND. So while i am poping the champagne, the GTI driver is still on the track. Saved money, LOL. The Golf R driver just went home with the prize money. WTF
Thats wrong, because on the following laps no drag start is needed, so the GTI is on the next lap only 1,5 sec slower. Because thats the difference from 0-100km/h GTI 6.2sec an Golf R 4.7sec ;-)
Can't stand all these cars now. All VW and Audi, seat and Skoda. All of the hot hatch versions are the exact same car. There is nothing separating them. It's just become so boring. The JDM market is beating the shit out of the European market. They're becoming cheaper and better quality. The interiors are matched if not better than somw European models. Plus, they all have their own platforms. So there's is genuine competition.
I believe for these races to be scientific, they need to be done at least 3 times to obtain accuracy as there are so many variables that could affect a car's performance than relying on just one take.
Sure, but I believe you can use 1 lap to determine that, because the signs to a good car is very dependent on how easy it is to access the power, handling overall performance and how quickly the driver can get in tune with the car. Honestly speaking the more you drive a car the more you learn how to use it effectively, and the manufacturers success is partly determined by how much confidence the car gives it's driver from the get go.
You need to do multiple laps as each car is different in the way it delivers power (FWD vs AWD). The driver needs to learn the car to get the fastest time out of it. If he just jumps in and goes he might set a fast time but that's testing how good the driver is. When it comes to tests like this, we need to see how good the car is. Therefore human error needs to be taken out of the equation by doing multiple laps, the driver can then reduce his times by altering his lines, braking areas and adjusting his driving style to suit each specific car. I believe that this would be a more accurate test if this was done. However, we cannot see on film whether they've spent the entire day there and are only showing clips from the fastest runs or whether it's a one time lap. I feel that the driver needs to be more active in the track day videos, giving a description of what the car is like to drive, because In the end, we buy performance cars with out hearts not our heads and need to know what it's like to drive on track (not that many people will track their Golfs)
I do imagine that what you are seeing for the lap is really just the compilation of many laps that the cars did (standard practice in the car review industry). For sure this is a number of laps, and the best overall single result is taken for each car. Had it been a single lap only, the camera would likely have been onboard instead, and the times perhaps slower due to inexperience with the car. :)
Loyiso Victor Mahlakahlaka I agree with u
Loyiso Victor Mahlakahlaka where's the science in 3times what is it based on?
"Alright, we've go the D out"
3 seconds is a big difference in tracks my friend. Im sure you know that. Worth it
really only 1.5 seconds when you consider the slower start from the fwd GTI. On a flying lap, they'll be pretty damn close. with a ecu tune, the GTI will be faster around the track lap to lap than an R, and still cost a hell of a lot less. Only thing the R does better is launch
By that logic, ButWhoWasMoto, you can tune the R too and then it gets an advantage as well. Anyways, these street cars are only going to be taken out for track days, as long as the owner has fun the time should be secondary.
n8tehgr8 you're missing the point. Even with a stage 1 upgrade on the GTi it would still cost like 80k less
5:05 "The D got really stuck in" 😂
I got teared up when you said 'that was quick' Idk I love my 7.5 GTI a lot ❤️
3 seconds on a small track like that is murder.
They did the same thing they've done on the MK4 Gti. The Golf 4 was de-tuned while the Audi TT which had the same engine and turbo at the time had its full capacity. so if the R. had its full power it would have done much better. I guess if you want to properly enjoy that extra 100k you have to have an engine remap tune on your golf R to unlock its full potential
1:08 "lit af" 😂😂😂
Cool. ...so nice these Golfs. ....but I would love to get a Golf Alltrack with manual trans.
He drove that GTI like mad wow!
"the D got really stuck in"..lol
Fezile Ntuli • as he was saying it, i scrolled past the comment you put up 2 months ago •
3s quicker with a standing start making up a fair bit of that and a dsg box making up the rest. Match gearboxes and do a rolling start and there's pretty much nothing in it.
GTD has gotta be my favourite
Do you realise 3 seconds around a 1.30 track is an extremely long time? It's a short track. The GTD being 5 seconds behind the GTI is eternity... thats a massive difference per lap. If you are a second a lap behind someone in motorsports you are getting destroyed.
Dude the problem is the less power of the gtd, as same power diésel is faster, for sure
a tuned gtd with 230hp and 480nm would be very close to the R 😂
@@MY-mp6bq with a stage 2+ is other car, watch dark darkside developments and learn
Nicolás P i know i have one also
The R has a lot of more weight. A friend took her TCR for the Nürburgring and was a lot quicker than the R. I really wanna see a stage 1 race / comparison as that's propably what most will want to drive
"LIT AF" , "GET THE D OUT" lmao
I would really love to see a lap time on the same day with a BMW 120d just for interest. As the BMW has 20kw more than the GTD and 20nm more than the R
Looking fresh with your fader and trim ... beards the new six pack
In Australia,VW are importing 150 examples of the GTI Performance Edition1 with 180 kw and 370 nm.The examples also include "a so-called Front Differential Lock - an electronically controlled variable unit capable of zero to 100 percent slip mitigation between the axles - and larger brakes"I dare say,the Golf GTI ED 1 could equal or even beat the Golf R's track time.
Lovely vw golf
great video, nice to see a back to back to back of these 3. Top work fellas
Breh lowkey funny 😂, love this channel
Would love to see the same test but with 3 adult passengers additional or even a uphill test. The GTD's torque should prove itself then.
Etienne Maxair what torque? Both the GTI and GTD have 350mn. Unless if you are talking about torque at low revs
Yes, from a value perspective (cost and km/l) the GTD is very competitive.
awesome content, perhaps you should add the voting button in between the track to vote the lap times we think the cars will do
You know the part that killed me is "a 100k for 3 seconds?" I always think along those lines too. Hence my preference of a C43 over a C63. The difference in pricing doesn't do justice to the difference in performance between the C63 & C43.
Would have been great to get feedback from the driver how each car feels and differs from one other.
Best review of golf ever. Thanks guys..
We got the "D" out lol
Should be a rolling start for fair track comparison. R likely detuned because cooling marginal in stock form for the track.
IF THE GTD HAVE THE SAME POWER AS THE GTI OR R FOR SURE THE GTD WIN. DIÉSEL POWER, REAL POWER
"LIT AF" LMFAO. Subscribed.
These arnt track cars.....predictable times. These cars are allrounders......Jack of all trades. A car that can be driven easily at its (almost) limit on a daily drive with no scares....and absorb the bumps...is a GOLF.
Where is the drag race?
Wez Loka r
Sorry that was a mistake lol😂😂
Wez Loka
the comparison R to GTI Performance would have been nice, it could be a close finish because of advantage in corners with the differential.
Ciro and cars . co za you did a great review on the 3 golf's and I would take the gti
Don't mock the R yet , wait for the drag race
Close to 100k subscribers!
Are the tires the same on these Golfs?
A Game of Golfs he he he he he classic
I would like to see this done in snow and then still see if he prefers the Gti. Awd out performes in dirt/rain/ and most important, snow.
Rolling lap time would of been alot more interesting! The golf r made well over a second just in the launch so those lap times are irrelevant
That is how the car comes. If anything the tire needs to be the same that would make a bigger difference. even in a roll race, the golf R would have been 2 sec quicker than the GTI. I would have got a GTI but I got tired of FWD and wanted awd so I drive a Golf R my next car will be a RWD.
Would be interesting to see the difference around the track if the GTi had a 40bhp remap! Cheaper than buying a golf R and I would guess not much noticeable difference in performance.
there more to the golf R engine to make that 40hp more than just a remap there are different internals and a different turbo two that is why the cars don't have the same engine codes look it up on any VW chat site and also you can look at askdap right here on youtube
Thanks for saving us a Hundred Grand
Drag race
Edit: it's their next video
I’m impressed by the Gtd tho only 5 seconds slower then the Gti with 46 more horse power then the gtd
Lit af in brackets hahaha good one
i got a mk7 gti, i love it, but optional awd would be awesome
is that what the golf R Is? AWD systems are not cheap. even though the Golf R comes with different internals of the engine makes it a batter base for modifications and able to handle more power.
“The D got really stuck in” 💀
I'd love to see a drag race between A250 sport vs golf R.
RS3 vs c63s
RS3 vs A45
An A250 is on the same level as a GTD
I so wish u Added the Golf 7 GTi clubsport to make fun of the Golf R
naah dude, it would have been much slower. Remember the clubsport is basically a normal golf with some aero kit. If you'd said Clubsport S, obviously that is a different story, but Clubsport S is horrid on the road for daily use anyway. So it wouldn't really be a fair comparison
I meant the Clubsport. The Clubsport has more power than the normal GTi and is lighter than the Golf R. Golf R is slow on the corners because of the added weight by the drivetrain. And remember the Clubsport in terms of performance matches Honda Civic Type R
Yeah, but I think more than the clubsport having more power than the GTI I would say it's very much dependent on the track as well. This track they are on doesn't have technical challenging corners, cause if it did then the GTI or Clubsport would have it 100%. But this track has more long corners and even straights, so the R can make up for the lost time on the sprints and coming out of corners. Cause I bet you if you did the same test on a track like Kyalami Circuit, GTI would be 1st, R 2nd and GTD will be destined for the same fate obviously.
Either way they are all a great choice, I guess it comes down to how big your pockets are.
you've got it backwards Nhlanhla. an all wheel drive car does much better on challenging corners than a rear or front wheel drive. getting out of the corners with a sprint from the AWD system ads on to the advantage
Mazwi Zwane not this awd system the clubsport and gti performance pack handle better than the R. The Halsey system weighs quite a bit more, so the clubsport ruins the R in every aspect. Tuned gti's best the R every time on a roll.
R great car for launching that's about it.
The Stark wins!
You mentioned the golf R is detuned. So how is it comparable to the rest of the car. Not doing justice to it then; are we?
Can you buy the golf with the 2.0 TDI bi-turbo 240hp ?
Don't think so, this is it. Would be cool tho...
So this is me taking a long shot. So I have recently started loving cars, yeah still getting the petrol head status. So I am studying Engineering at Stellenbosch University and seeing as you make car videos around Cape Town I was wondering if I could help out some weekends. You don't need to pay me or anything and I could work with the camera crew since I'm still learning how to use video editing software. I really just want to experience being around some of the cars and hopefully someday own the ones that steal my breath away.
+Thato Inama Hi Thato, thanks for your comment. Please email info@cars.co.za and address the email to Ciro.
I prefer the D. 😂
I bet you do 😉😅
I prefer YOU
Remap the GTD and then have a rolling race from 30mph, watch the GTD sit on the arse off the golf R
Crazy Y do the same to the gt and watch it walk the r
What were the track temps compared to the last Golf R?
Awesome
so Ash is the tame racing driver for this channel?
the next.. race manual vs automatic.. please
GTD review coming up soon I hope?
those 3 seconds were gained at the start because of its 4wd system. Which makes the GTI even more worth buying over the R.
I don't thank so. the GTI does 0-60 in 5.8 seconds, not in 7.5 the golf R does it anywhere from 4.5 to 4.9 depending on what you read. last time I check 4.5 from 6 is not 3 at most 1.5 seconds. I like both but if you plan on moding the car the R is the beater choose because at some point you just can not lay down power in an fwd car and that point daily driving cars is 450 hp and higher
Yeah for almost a 100k more then the GTI you get a 3 second faster car that's a very smart business decision
The differences in currency also mean a lot in terms of making a buying decision. 'a hundred grand' he says, but in South African currency, its hard to rationalize if you don't know what you can buy with just one dollar. Here in Canada the Golf R is just over 40k a similarly equipped GTI is just under 40k - so does $1000 CAD equate to 100,000 South African Rand? Checking google currency conversion its about 10,000 Rand. So then 100,000 Rand is $10k CAD or there abouts. Which looking at VW's website is more comparing a base GTI to the R - which to me isn't very fair in terms of making a buying decision. My guess would be South Africa may not have a base model of the R just like we don't here, whereas the US for example does - and that saves about 4k. That would be a better comparison.
Golf R is heavy, has more parts in the transmission and will understeer more on the track.
you mean more parts in the drive train, not in the transmission. they are going to have the same number of parts. 300 pounds does not make car understeer that much more. understeer is just an issue you have to deal with fwd and AWD cars and even some RWD cars have that issue. now the weight might make the car slower though say a slalom.
And were is the golf sport Line ? ? ?
It was only the "small" GTI without performance package and front diff
Rolling start and the R and Gti might be even....
can u do bently bentaygya vs range rover svr ...plz
GTD makes much more sense
Honestly I prefer the golf
What about the GTE?
IsDitGerben The GTE is not available in South Africa
@@moejasss do you know why?
What does de-tune mean?
Were is the golf TSI ?
If you aren’t from South Africa watching this I bet you are thinking “$500k for a golf???” Na bro, it’s R500k…. $45k
(LIT AF)🤣🤣
so a focus st was faster than golf r coz it did 1.33. something
GTI was the flattest in the corners.
Atenție cad mere mă adus aici:))
GTD has 380nm and GTI has 350nm
GTI is still bold, isn't it Ciro.....?
The gti has beaten the R on previous track tests on a flying lap....
Ciao Ciro ma tu sei italiano ? Lo parli bene l inglese molto bene ma tu vivi e lavori in Inghilterra o Australia ? ? ? Risp .
Nino Russo Ciao Nino! No, Io sono nato e abbito in Sud Africa, mio padre e Italiano
Who cares about track performance ? 0.1% of population... In real conditions more important are accelerations from 30-70, 70-120 kmh, and of course fuel consumption. I am also interested in skidpad and lateral g, and balance. Probably GTI has little bit better balance than GTD, less understeering because of lighter engine, but 50% higher fuel consumption. If you buy daily car, what is more important, fuel consumption or understeering ?
Also GTD TDI engine has lot more potential for high mileage than GTI TSI. GTI has better exhaust sound, better acceleration and less understeer, but worse fuel consumption....
Why can't he just say the HP and Torque like a normal person xD
South African based channel...
...because the Imperial system makes no sense and South Africa, like 95% of the world, uses the Metric system. HP and Torque (I assume you mean ft/lbs here) is abnormal.
Uncle Jezza. 97.5% if you want to get technical (considering there are 195 countries in the world)
R100 000 for 3 seconds LOL... GTD for me does it just fine.
320d m sport vs 7.5 God
I'd still take the GTD. I'm thinking of fuel consumption.
Same here.
With a proper APR tune, I bet you could match stock GTI performance out that diesel
It is far more sensible, financially.
I agree, but diesel will soon be gone
if you have so much money to spend on a car , you are not buying it for the great fuel consumption..
The GTI is only 3 sec slower (lap), considering a 70 lap race. YOUR ONLY 2.5 LAPS BEHIND. So while i am poping the champagne, the GTI driver is still on the track. Saved money, LOL. The Golf R driver just went home with the prize money. WTF
Thats wrong, because on the following laps no drag start is needed, so the GTI is on the next lap only 1,5 sec slower. Because thats the difference from 0-100km/h GTI 6.2sec an Golf R 4.7sec ;-)
Detuned Golf R that sucks!
2.0 tdi v gti
All this and only 57k views? Why? Because there's no point and no fun.
Lol the golf R is slower than Civic Type R
Abulele Kufa i suppose a newer test in nurburging road race has made golf r faster....
I meant of this test. And there is no way that the Golf R could make faster lap records than the Civic
Abulele Kufa civic type r has disadvantage as front will drive but I would like to see them race
Gtd suspension etc... is not made for racing.
Does Ford make the STD yet? :P
They do in the UK. its quite low on power though. The petrol is 250hp and the diesel is 180hp.
I've just realised you were making fun of the name STD lol :P they didnt call it the STD unfortunately, I wish they did though
That guy is a slow driver!!!!!!!
GTD has more torque than the GTI. Get your facts right
Golf r is faster than that I don't believe it
blah blah blah honda type r is the real hot hatch today
Yes, the type R destroyed the Golfs :-)
good car. Hate the looks i take the golf
Can't stand all these cars now. All VW and Audi, seat and Skoda. All of the hot hatch versions are the exact same car. There is nothing separating them. It's just become so boring. The JDM market is beating the shit out of the European market. They're becoming cheaper and better quality. The interiors are matched if not better than somw European models. Plus, they all have their own platforms. So there's is genuine competition.
At least drive a manual...