This is exciting! You can see it wants to work. I believe that there would have to be multiple ways to achieve the same ends, besides the exact way Bessler accomplished it. Good on you, my friend! Wish I had more time to experiment, too, but I'm so glad there are others like yourself keeping the faith!
Thanks Jacob. I do think it will work. Read my reply to THX4. What people do not understand is that scientists say that this is impossible because gravity is a force and has no energy. Since gravity has no energy then conservation of energy is not possible. From Western Texas A&M University; www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2014/01/08/since-gravity-is-unlimited-can-we-use-it-as-an-infinite-energy-source/
Very nice work. I suspect Bessler used a combination of gravity and centrifugal force together. According to the story, some of Bessler's wheels would speed up under a load. This could be because the load helps to turn a moving point into a fixed pivot so the weight swings around the pivot and moves in or out. The exact construction of Bessler's machines will remain a mystery, so we can only build on what we know. Gravity motors are doable but gravity is a weak force and difficult to harness in a continuing motion. Ron Brandt's two-pivot gravity motor is probably the easiest to build.
The principle that I'm working with disagrees with science. Resistance increases entropy. It does not create work. There is a way what you said could be considered.Basically as a weight is lifted by using the axle as a hoist, it could help to move the weight moving towards the axle. Theoretically if my build works then what I just mentioned to you could as well. Most people don't get into science and the law conservation of angular momentum is often overlooked.
@@free-energy-systems Correct. There are ways to combine forces to get extra energy. Consider the tetherball for example, when the ball wraps around the pole it still has all of its inertia but it slightly higher off the earth. There is a document you can find online called "Jovan Marjanovic ANGULAR MOMENTUM, PARAMETRIC OSCILLATOR AND OVER UNITY", which has some good ideas in it.
Merci mon ami. I think in the next video I'll show the mechanics. I have an assembly that I need to build that will "kick" the weights out and release the retraction line.
You have to use the centripetal force and turn it into acceleration. You have to catch it and release it at the right point. Its not only about shifting weights.
When the weight gets its offset to provide torque, might we want to have it deliver its torque AND reset to the top bottom or other positon a bit ahead of time? Going round the rim is the way of most torque at first, bit in the last vertical centimeters, is it still speeding the wheel up enough to be worth it? Could the weight move to horizontal trajectory from 5 o'clock, trading vertical speed for horizontal, delivering a bit of torque early, and then make it to 7 o'clock "ahead" of schedule with the wheel carrying more speed and mass than had the weight going the long way around? The "catch" engiging when the weight is at 5 o'clock needs to be on the rotor to not eat torque, but it might need to press against a stator member laterally to work. Some curve to the catch for the weight (maybe disk or sphere rolling) to transition to a trajectory where it can catch up the effectively the roter at 6 o'clock or 5:30.
It's always been a brain teaser for me that two balls can roll down a slope and reach a destination that's lower and horizontally removed. One balls reaches a height below the destination, gathers more speed, and makes to the destination before the other, having lost the exact same vertical distance. The circle is NOT the shortest way from 3:00 to 6:00. Is there a faster way where all or most of the torque is transferred anyway?
Alternatively, the weight might travel from 3:00 to a point level with top bottom or even lower, directly below 5:00. So transmit torque early. Then travel horizontally with more HORIZONTAL velocity, off the wheel, and advancing on the wheel. When the weight and wheel reconnect, weight radius and rotor+weight speed are better than having followed the traditional locked-on-rim path. Anyway see what I might be on to, or know which exact example of this failed to work?
If the weight starts lifting at 5:30 then conservation of angular momentum might allow it to transfer more force to the wheel before it reaches 6 o'clock. The drop of the weight after 5:30 is when gravity has less effect on it because it is basically a horizontal movement by then.
@@Cloxxki There is. I have realized Johann Bessler's Wheel and may build it in Europe. I have the design posted on my Instagram page jameslindgaard1 and Free Energy Systems. I have been in contact with a librarian at Utrecht University. They have a rare, original book by Bessler. I'll post links to Utrecht's webpage for Bessler there.
@@free-energy-systems I'm in NL as well. Did you have your design be tested in a simulator? The IT tools for such systems are pretty neat. Whether we have it right the way we try to apply the time advantage that might be had, we can try the inverse as well. Spend more time on the right than left? Be off the wheel for part of the lifting side so it can advance radially? What I can't oversee yet is the kinetic energy of the weight and what's needed to make it to top dead center and catch up to its place on the wheel. A weight might also short cut from 2:00 to 6:00, do its job transferring work, arrive with the needed velocity, and help the wheel on the way back up, or be helped up, just a bit ahead of radial schedule. Alternatively, a weight might travel straight down from 3:00, catch speed early and do work early, and then travel up on a secundary connected wheel or lever to save time once more. Might we want to force a weight gain overspeed on the way down, have the next weight in line help it fling down? With overspeed a weight makes it up higher or quicker. Sorry, do many things need to be simulated before eliminated. I know purple have dedicated lives at documenting it all, but we must keep believing there is a way. Can't wait to see your build or sim.
non vedo il suo utilizzo perche non sviluppa la potenza ma e un moto per inerzia voglio far vedere un attrezzo che sviluppa la potenza con i stessi giri l'attrezzo e formato con leve ( 6 ) che creo un ruotismo con qualcosa che non posso direche viene mosso da un motore di 1.5KW che fa 1400giri che vengono ridotti a 40 questa e la velocita che e uguali in uscita dove collego un generatore dopoaver aumentato i giri a 1600 che mi da 13KW dal generatore collego un altro attrezzo completo e ancora un altro ( allinfinito ) per creare una centrale elettrica a costo zero l'attrezzolo si puo vedere su RUclips scrivendo MOLTIPLICATORE DI POTENZA
Кино
This is exciting! You can see it wants to work. I believe that there would have to be multiple ways to achieve the same ends, besides the exact way Bessler accomplished it. Good on you, my friend! Wish I had more time to experiment, too, but I'm so glad there are others like yourself keeping the faith!
Thanks Jacob. I do think it will work. Read my reply to THX4. What people do not understand is that scientists say that this is impossible because gravity is a force and has no energy. Since gravity has no energy then conservation of energy is not possible. From Western Texas A&M University; www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2014/01/08/since-gravity-is-unlimited-can-we-use-it-as-an-infinite-energy-source/
Todos estamos esperando que un día eso un sea realidad.
¡Ojalá antes de Navidad y feliz Navidad!
Very nice work. I suspect Bessler used a combination of gravity and centrifugal force together. According to the story, some of Bessler's wheels would speed up under a load. This could be because the load helps to turn a moving point into a fixed pivot so the weight swings around the pivot and moves in or out. The exact construction of Bessler's machines will remain a mystery, so we can only build on what we know. Gravity motors are doable but gravity is a weak force and difficult to harness in a continuing motion. Ron Brandt's two-pivot gravity motor is probably the easiest to build.
The principle that I'm working with disagrees with science. Resistance increases entropy. It does not create work. There is a way what you said could be considered.Basically as a weight is lifted by using the axle as a hoist, it could help to move the weight moving towards the axle. Theoretically if my build works then what I just mentioned to you could as well. Most people don't get into science and the law conservation of angular momentum is often overlooked.
@@free-energy-systems Correct. There are ways to combine forces to get extra energy. Consider the tetherball for example, when the ball wraps around the pole it still has all of its inertia but it slightly higher off the earth. There is a document you can find online called "Jovan Marjanovic ANGULAR MOMENTUM, PARAMETRIC OSCILLATOR AND OVER UNITY", which has some good ideas in it.
Nice work, but it would deserve a longer version.
The best for the continuation.
Merci mon ami. I think in the next video I'll show the mechanics. I have an assembly that I need to build that will "kick" the weights out and release the retraction line.
You have to use the centripetal force and turn it into acceleration. You have to catch it and release it at the right point. Its not only about shifting weights.
It is obvious that you paid attention and thought about it. I am doing a new build for that reason. I am hoping next month it will be finished.
When the weight gets its offset to provide torque, might we want to have it deliver its torque AND reset to the top bottom or other positon a bit ahead of time? Going round the rim is the way of most torque at first, bit in the last vertical centimeters, is it still speeding the wheel up enough to be worth it? Could the weight move to horizontal trajectory from 5 o'clock, trading vertical speed for horizontal, delivering a bit of torque early, and then make it to 7 o'clock "ahead" of schedule with the wheel carrying more speed and mass than had the weight going the long way around? The "catch" engiging when the weight is at 5 o'clock needs to be on the rotor to not eat torque, but it might need to press against a stator member laterally to work. Some curve to the catch for the weight (maybe disk or sphere rolling) to transition to a trajectory where it can catch up the effectively the roter at 6 o'clock or 5:30.
It's always been a brain teaser for me that two balls can roll down a slope and reach a destination that's lower and horizontally removed. One balls reaches a height below the destination, gathers more speed, and makes to the destination before the other, having lost the exact same vertical distance.
The circle is NOT the shortest way from 3:00 to 6:00. Is there a faster way where all or most of the torque is transferred anyway?
Alternatively, the weight might travel from 3:00 to a point level with top bottom or even lower, directly below 5:00. So transmit torque early. Then travel horizontally with more HORIZONTAL velocity, off the wheel, and advancing on the wheel. When the weight and wheel reconnect, weight radius and rotor+weight speed are better than having followed the traditional locked-on-rim path. Anyway see what I might be on to, or know which exact example of this failed to work?
If the weight starts lifting at 5:30 then conservation of angular momentum might allow it to transfer more force to the wheel before it reaches 6 o'clock. The drop of the weight after 5:30 is when gravity has less effect on it because it is basically a horizontal movement by then.
@@Cloxxki There is. I have realized Johann Bessler's Wheel and may build it in Europe. I have the design posted on my Instagram page jameslindgaard1 and Free Energy Systems. I have been in contact with a librarian at Utrecht University. They have a rare, original book by Bessler. I'll post links to Utrecht's webpage for Bessler there.
@@free-energy-systems I'm in NL as well. Did you have your design be tested in a simulator? The IT tools for such systems are pretty neat.
Whether we have it right the way we try to apply the time advantage that might be had, we can try the inverse as well. Spend more time on the right than left? Be off the wheel for part of the lifting side so it can advance radially?
What I can't oversee yet is the kinetic energy of the weight and what's needed to make it to top dead center and catch up to its place on the wheel.
A weight might also short cut from 2:00 to 6:00, do its job transferring work, arrive with the needed velocity, and help the wheel on the way back up, or be helped up, just a bit ahead of radial schedule.
Alternatively, a weight might travel straight down from 3:00, catch speed early and do work early, and then travel up on a secundary connected wheel or lever to save time once more. Might we want to force a weight gain overspeed on the way down, have the next weight in line help it fling down? With overspeed a weight makes it up higher or quicker.
Sorry, do many things need to be simulated before eliminated. I know purple have dedicated lives at documenting it all, but we must keep believing there is a way. Can't wait to see your build or sim.
Hello I would like to talk to you about these motion machines. Is there a email I can contact you at?
There is but there is a lot of math involved. That's unavoidable.
@@free-energy-systems that's fine. Can I get your email if you don't mind?
non vedo il suo utilizzo perche non sviluppa la potenza ma e un moto per inerzia voglio far vedere un attrezzo che sviluppa la potenza con i stessi giri l'attrezzo e formato con leve ( 6 ) che creo un ruotismo con qualcosa che non posso direche viene mosso da un motore di 1.5KW che fa 1400giri che vengono ridotti a 40 questa e la velocita che e uguali in uscita dove collego un generatore dopoaver aumentato i giri a 1600 che mi da 13KW dal generatore collego un altro attrezzo completo e ancora un altro ( allinfinito ) per creare una centrale elettrica a costo zero l'attrezzolo si puo vedere su RUclips scrivendo MOLTIPLICATORE DI POTENZA