The Mars Insight Lander failed to place it's "Mole" heat probe. Several attempts were made to compact the ground around the Drill sight using the robotic Arm but after 15 attempts the ground proved to be too "Clumpy" to drill and place the Heat probe. This was a main reason for the Insight mission and it was nearly scrubbed as a result. I'm surprised to hear that NASA has enough Seismic data to determine there's so much Water under the surface, especially with only one seismic detector that never really got placed underground.
FYI, when we geologists say that there are oceans inside the earth, it is not like what we see on the surface. It is water cointened in minerals and micro-fractures.
Conjecture. No current tech can determine vast deposits of water encapsulated deep within earth but the clue of such is "fossil fuels" which merely need carbon and water (hydrogen and oxygen) combined into such; maybe under extreme pressure and temperature and plasma fields if not Berkland currents. Fossil fuels are constantly regenerating; the label is misleading to suggest finite resource when it is far from that; as might well be water deep within the (hollow?) Earth.
There is a huge freshwater lake below the ice in Antarctica, Lake Vostok, similar in size to Lake Ontario in North America, according to NASA. The lake is roughly 240 km long x 50 km wide, and hundreds of meters deep. Apparently there is also thought to be a giant subglacial lake under the ice in Greenland too.
My bet is on Europe, the (highly likely) deep ocean under the icecrost may have black smokers on the deep deep bottom, with some sort of life. I'm 54 now, with a little luck I might learn before my demise, that it is indeed so. I don't know why that is so important to me, but it is. I really would close my eyes for the last time in more peace knowing that there is life outside earth. Why? I don't know, it's non tangible, but very important for me.
@@Magic-mushrooms113 Rhawn Joseph and David Duvall? Nah. They're notorious frauds who couldn't recognize a Burgess Shale fossil if they saw one outside of a book.
@@Yutani_Crayven...in Maryland you can't drink rain water, when I moved to DC they issued a don't drink rain, or tap water because you can't boil out the chemicals,...they are forever. And that's the name, forever chems. Mars water...
Microbiologiat here. It is actually easy to explain why the water sank into the bedrock more than it would do on earth: the thickness of the crust. Once water gets too close to magma, it flows upwards again in a convection motion. Hence thermal vents. Since Mars has a thicker crust, water goes deeper before it gets too hot. When it goes up, it gets colder before it reaches the surface, most of the times. On Earth, these environments thrive with prokariotic life, and you can also find more complex life that feeds on bacteria, such as mussels, tubular worms, and crabs and other arthropods who feeds on those multicell organisms. I am sure we will find at least a thriving microbial ecossystem in Mars subsurface waters.
we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
Water started to appear about 3.8 bil years ago on earth, and homo sapiens started to form about 300,000 years ago. It took app 3.77 bil years from Amoeba to homo sapiens. And YES earth's 5 mass extinction is considered as part of evolution.
There has to be a Goldilocks zone of heat it can’t be to cold nor can it be to hot access to a power source like the sun a stable environment the list goes on
@@nono-yh2vi Well that's the point. If there is heat and water that means it's not boiling evaporated water (like your sun example) or frozen water. Again, if there is heat and water together combined with amino acids and carbon compounds there is a possibility for life
Not quite, for water to sustain life it's alkalinity must be low enough, meaning, too much salt and not enough CO2 does not allow photosynthesis to take place. Easy to test in the lab. CO2 reduces the alkalinity, cold water promotes solubility of CO2 in water . Don't speculate, do some simple experimentation.
Three gases are required for life -- hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. Hydrogen and Oxygen make water, but also, just add Nitrogen and Carbon and you have protein and the building blocks of life. However, there are also Non-Breathing forms of life which are VERY DIFFERENT from us.
Martians-dead!-slain by the putrefactive and disease bacteria against which their systems were unprepared; slain as the red weed was being slain; slain, after all man’s devices had failed, by the humblest things that God, in his wisdom, has put upon this earth.
Yes, buildings and trees give it away. The least this guy could do is a bit of research on the topic and show an ACTUAL picture of the subject. Thumbs down for pure laziness.
we have had a domed complex and man on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
As a biologist, I have to object. There is pretty little leeway to build a self-replicating system from this universe's chemistry, particularly if it needs to be a) error-correcting in its replication, but b) not so much that it cannot evolve. In other words, the odds of any "biology unlike we know it" are really close to zero. A Martian organism would probably use slightly different bases, or even something that is chemically very different but informationally equivalent, for its genetic apparatus, but considering the known (i.e. Terran) biodiversity, and considering that it all started from some clayey muck and a bit of dirty water, the fact remains that at least in the one case we know, all life has a common origin, which is just one of the numerous theoretical possibility to build a living system from the components we naurally find have on a Goldilocks planet such as ours. And we are as sure as one can get in such hard-to-study cases that there once was RNA-based life, but it was fully displaced with DNA-based organisms. So "biology as we know it" has a proven and very massive selective advantage, and anyone who tells you that "biology utterly unlike we know it" is more than a remote and *very* theoretical possibility - more so on extremely Earth-like planets like early Mars - is a gullible fool who has no clue whatsoever about biology: Natural selection among the very first organisms on Earth was so unforgiving that even the harshest conditions found at present are a walk in the park by comparison, and most of the theoretically possible biochemical pathways are simply not competitive in any way compared to those that ultimately established themselves: for example, nothing life on Earth ever tried - and life on Earth tried A LOT - comes even remotely close to high-energy phosphate bonds as a means to store biochemical energy under Earth conditions - and for early Martian conditions it holds true just the same. Similarly, a 3-element codon allows to encode for the whole range of amino acids needed by an organism, while 2 elements is insufficient, and 4 is wasteful... biologically, Martian life can be expected to be a close parallel to Terran life, using different compounds but structurally much the same (cells with compartments and some kind of genetic material consisting of a backbone element and 4- or maybe 3-nary coding compounds arranged in 3- or maybe 4-element codons). Probably, remnant Martian life in crustal water would be simplified compared to terrestrial life, due to the paucity of (especially organic) chemistry down there - on Earth the crustal microbiome is still connected to the surface one.
Mars won't just stop surprising us😅. This is a great video. It'd be interesting to see what happens when a sample is drilled from those martian underground rocks.
we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
Don't bother waiting, it's really deep down and automated drilling technology to work on Mars will take another generation or two - and by then, we have too much of a problem on Earth to waste any thoughts on Mars.
That's what many people forget. It is not hard to pocure an aqueous liquid in some quantity on Mars (even though it would really be much like very aggressive bleach, not water), and the new seismic data is best explained by deep rocks being essentially like a sponge for fossil water. But there is no conceivable way to recover this (probably less contaminated) water anytime soon. And as soon as any Martian water is on the surface, it just evaporates away, leaving you with highly toxic sludge that will corrode most substances. Mars is pretty harmless when it's dry - the regolith is well-weathered dust much like in the least hospitable parts of an Atacama desert evaporational basin, but even drier. Rovers and similar equipment can operate on it for years - Luna, with its extremely abrasive regolith, will ruin most complex equipment within months if not weeks; the stuff can (due to its electrostatic charges) even creep into "airtight" seals. But once you wet Mars with plain old H2O, it becomes as destructive as Venus if not more so (albeit for chemically quite different reasons - but equipment failures would likely happen in a similar way. Saturated cold perchlorate solution is not that different from boiling sulfuric acid in its effect on organic materials).
Little clue for you: Humans have a biorhythm of 25 not 24 hours periodicity; aligned more to Mars then Earth. We reset daily with exposure to solar spectra; not merely visible light; as we used to on Mars for millennia. We are still evolving to reconcile the difference. As for "hiding" I would use "out of sight" as the better descriptor; as also applies to our "Moon."
All that water is now in earth's oceans as Mars passed us by on its way to its present orbit and deposited it during the flood. We have had man and a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
Theoretically yes, it would be archaean-like microbes. On Earth we find (very few and highly adapted) bacteria in the "fossil water" in the deeper crust's fractures. There is no inherent reason why these should not also exist on Mars, given that life on the Martian surface had enough time to evolve to this stage, and then simply retreat down into the crust as the planet's core cooled and the surface water evaporated or froze. For recent reviews, see Sar et al's 2019 paper "Deep Biosphere", and "Microbial Life in Deep Terrestrial Continental Crust" by Kazy et al (2021), which are by the same research group. Suffice to say that there are crustal-water microbes utilizing iron, chloride, and carbon dioxide metabolism, which would work on Mars just as well. Unfortunately, the Martian surface is so favorable for aeolian and chemical erosion that even molecular traces of life are unlikely to survive, and any molecular "biosignature" we'd find is unlikely to be genuine instead of some fairly recent product of an exoctic abiotic chemical reaction. Any surving life on Mars is very likely far below the surface, and effectively inaccessible until there is sustained habitation on Mars that could manufacture the equipment needed to bore so far down... that is to say, it's unlikely that we wll lever find it, because even if such a colony could persist, it would imply a thriving population of introduced terrestrial microbes that would contaminate everything... kinda hard to search for a an entirely unknown form of life if your equipment teems with known forms of life.
You don't seem to know this, but there is geological evidence that something collided with Mars and that it was partially resurfaced. Do some homework! Cheers!
they also got the whole pressure cooker thing wrong... the sun evaporates water. water vapor rises from the heat from the planet's surface. the water becomes clouds. the huge mystery about mars's atmoshpere being gone is the fucking magnetosphere weakened. we already know this information. the core cooled down, solidified, lost its convectional forces creating the magnetosphere via the dynamo effect, solar winds stripped the atmosphere away like the fucking big bad wolf, taking the water in the air away with it over a long period of time, chipping away at all available water. im no genius, im no astronomer, but ive heard it from enough sources to know that a lot of people seem to agree that this is the fucking reason, and its tangible and realistic. for a channel focused on space science, im very disappointed they get all these things wrong. sorry to go off like that, its not directed at you pointandshoot lol
No kidding. Mars has had far more collisions than our good Earth, being so much closer to the Asteroid Belt. Look at the great basins on Mars. Those were from asteroids colliding, likely causing not only cratering, but valleys, cracks, and temporary flows of water. . .
I got that written in my meteorite!!! Some sort of atomic explosions happened in Mars!!! Also whatever did this will be on the way to do same with planet Earth in near future!
Mars also once had a more powerful magnetic field. That magnetic field protected the atmosphere and much of the surface water. Underground water, with minerals and heat from the still partially lava like core - might mean life underground on mars.
Actually no. The magnetic traces left in the geology of Mars indicate that it's magnetic field wasn't ever very strong (because it's a small planet 1:10th the size of Earth), and died out early. Then it was "goodbye atmosphere".
Then the human species will go extinct on Earth. It may be by asteroid impact (Pick a dice set for odds of around 1:100 million. Roll once a year.), or much more likely, by destroying our own environment. Do you know the "Fermi Paradox"? "Where is everyone?" I think the answer is clear : most species destroy their environment with their technologies before they get into space and manage to get away from their own pollution. Hence, no aliens.
Venus is an intruder Planet; it did not originate from our sun. Titan, a moon of Saturn, is another candidate as an intruder. Uranus lays on it's side, has a dual-center magnetic field, and retrograde motion. I suspect that Uranus was penetrated by a metallic, highly charged, intruder, which remains there today. ALL (almost all) of the inhabited worlds of space are evolutionary. Evolution is one of God's creative techniques. Life on Earth was formulated using only what was available on Earth already. Basically, Iron and salty water -- of course, by Iron, I mean all the elements of Ur. Salt Water = An Tia = LIGHT.
@@livewellherenow because you confirmed my suspicions in a video that you have since deleted from your RUclips channel. Why did you delete it? I thought it was great.
It might have been worth mentioning that Mars used to have a magnetosphere in its youth, but some catastrophic event or other (presumably an impact with a planetoid/ moon sized object) resulted in the loss of this atmosphere-protecting shield.
It shouldn't have been a surprise at all, especially given that the same thing has been found here in Earth's crust. The amount of water locked inside the Earth's crust is more than four times the amount on the surface. This helps to explain the origins of some of the biggest and deepest sinkholes that show up out of nowhere. If the crust of the planet shifts constantly, gravity brings the water down deeper and deeper. This also helps to keep the upper crust cool enough to live on. The water inside the crust permeates everything - rock, gas, and minerals. The water is in constant motion, even though we can't observe it moving, we can see its effects. The real question is, can life survive at depth inside the crust? Since life can survive in deep space, it probably can survive there as well, although we may have a hard time finding and recognizing it, since it may be dormant and hard to distinguish from its surroundings. This may be the reason that we've missed it on Mars - it's just very difficult to identify. Since there have been many discoveries of the building blocks for life in deep space, life could be everywhere, and we've just not been able to identify it yet in its current form.
At 6:27 " ... places where the waves slow down would indicate higher densities." Wrong. Waves travel faster in higher density material. The speed of sound is 4x higher in water than in the air.
A captivating visual presentation -- is this -- of prosaic scientific facts. Its illuminating unfolding of informatiom about Mars facilitates exploration of personal inner space.
government lies! we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
as stated in a comment on one of your last mars videos.. theres ample, ample evidence for plate tectonics. it's very similar to the argument about water that lasted up until the 2000s still love the video
The problem with Mars is it lacks an Iron core. This deprives it not only of a magnetic shield, but also sufficient gravity to hold an Oxygen atmosphere close to the surface for very long. Simply put most of the planet's Oxygen drifted off into space eons ago. Even is a way was found to replenish it, without increasing the planet's gravity it would all just float away into space again. As you say, without the pressure of an atmosphere to hold it, any liquid water also turns into vapor and floats up and away.
Have you heard of plasma tunneling? There's a new effort to dig deeper than we could before by literally just using a hot stream of plasma that doesn't need to be brought back up to the Earth's surface so you can dig away faster than before. We're talking being able to dig to geothermal energy in 90 days.
"Just like earth" is a wild exaggeration. If Mars formed at about the same time as earth and then dried out, there wasn't enough time for life "just like earth" to develop. True there might have developed single cell organisms but that would have been about the limit.
Sry to say this but I think it actually got way further from multi cell organism's and then something happened... also It happened in Mars not as collision but more like atomic explosions!
In theory you can, but that would be wasting a lot of resources - without magnetoshpere atmosphere is taken out by solar wind, so the effect would be temporary.
Check the video at exactly 5:48 center right, there's what seems like a square structure with what looks like some pillars on the floor forming what seems like ruins.
I would guess that once Mars cooled enough, water simply went underground and filled lava chambers and tunnels that were no longer filled with magma. If so, that also devastated the atmosphere. Mars never had plate tectonics, empty lava chambers maybe huge - and there might be plenty of them.
The closer to the core of mars you get the higher the ambient air pressure, liquid water can exist about 5km underground in caves on mars, or maybe a couple thousand metres down from the deepest canyon.
Yes!! Brilliant. Liquid brine does flow from time to time on slopes, very briefly, but long enough to flow ~1000 meters before evaporating. Water [dew] has formed briefly on landers, and then quickly evaporate/sublimated away. The deep canyons you mention [or deep depressions like Argyre or Hellas] likely are within a km or two of liquid water. [note: as you may already know, vapor has been recorded in canyon systems, and mountain summits.]
deepest hole on earth is 8 miles deep, you want to believe guys know what the core of mars is made of and what the cores of the moons of jupiter are made on okay
Those huge volcanoes bleed the core dry hence less gravity and once the smoke left or settled so the surface was less atmosphere so it went underground
The Moon is about one billion years older than Earth. That means that there was no collision between two bodies that created the Earth and the Moon, together.
I keep wondering whether the lack of a moon large enough to keep a fluid mantle on Mars was the reason for its core to freeze, then the planet lost its magnetosphere, and this being the reason for the atmosphere to get swept away in a solar storm.
This implies that you think the Earth's Moon is, somehow, "keeping" the [Earth's] mantle fluid. That needs more justification. When you're talking about events more than a few kilometres fomr the surface, the main control on events is the planet's own stores and sources of heat, not what comes in from the Sun. That doesn't have an important effect more than a few km from the surface. There's no need for complex physics in this. Mars is, as most people know (I hope!) "half the size of Earth". 3396 vs 6371 km radius, ratio 0.53. But that's the linear measure. In VOLUME that means that Mars is 0.53^3=0.151 (~=6.6:1) of the *volume* of Earth. Worse, Mars is too small to experience much internal compression, so the *mass* ratio is even worse : 5.97 (Earth) vs 0.642 (Mars) in units of 10^24 kg, a *mass* ratio of 0.107 (9.29:1 - almost 10:1). Since space big, really really big, it doesn't warm up (measurably) from planets cooling into it and the *main* control on how long it takes for the heat of construction of a planet to flow away is the planet's mass. Earth is (after 4.5 billion years) leaking, approximately, equal amounts of "primordial heat" (from the energy of impacts constructing the planet) and "radiogenic heat" (produced by radioactivity), so one would expect Mars to have cooled to a similar state after 0.45 billion years. Which is, indeed, the approximate time that the planet lost it's magnetic field, and steadily thereafter, it's atmosphere. (I'm assuming that Mars and Earth have broadly similar compositions ; which from the minerals seen by the various rovers, is a reasonable position.) Mars is a MUCH smaller planet than Earth. Most people see the "radius is one half" figure and think it is "half the size of Earth". But in terms of mass, and so thermal history, Mars is closer to *1/10th* the size of Earth. And most people don't remember that - they use the irrelevant "half the radius" number to frame their expectations. Humans aren't very good at estimating things. That's why we invented maths, and then physics.
@@ETSpaceRocks Why do you think that "your" meteorite has atomic explosion remnants? Which isotope decays did you collect. And do you have the calibration records from the isotope energy measuring device, for before and after your sample was tested? (If you don't have that data, then the person who sold you the meteorite may well have been lying to you. It happens. Sorry.)
There is much more about Mars than one may think. Put a large enough mass in orbit around Mars, and the core will start producing a heavier gravity. A mass about the size of our moon but smaller.
Earth has plenty of large underground water reservoirs, I firmly believe that Mars also will have these as well. We already know for a fact that Mars has lava tubes and underground caverns since roof sections have collapsed on some allowing us a peek into the space below. It doesn't take a great leap of imagination to see some of these caverns/tubes having been filled with water while Mars was wet and warm.
This changes the possibilities for inhabiting Mars. Build as deep beneath the surface as is feasible to create habitable spaces isolated from the radiation and extreme temperature cycles that make the surface so inhospitable. Then, drill deeper to access water, which may even be warm enough to be a useful energy source (if not for generation of electricity, then at least for maintaining livable temperatures). With a nuclear power-source for the short-term, you could support agriculture, industry, and science, all in relative safety and comfort. Sure, the initial set-up would be more difficult and expensive, but the return on the investment would be massive. Pumping water to the surface could theoretically also be used to increase the density of the atmosphere, perhaps bringing true terraforming into the realm of feasibility...
Without scientific evidence. I've always had this feeling, the water went towards the core. The same as the Nullarbor Plain with limestone aquifer. The lava tubes. No volcanic gas, which escaped. I just have had this feeling.
Mars has a different PH than Earth. The h2o would have a high alkaline level, something like acidic but opposite. Venus is more acidic than Earth. Both can dissolve things like acid.
2:18 - Actuall the frozen poles (CO2 and water ice there) are subject to sublimation and solar wind stripaway too. Especially in Martian summers more ice sublimates always keeping some ableit little in the atmosphere. It was just assumed that these are the last remnants (still stripping away). Which I personally for a long time thought that it didn't account for water soaking down into the depths of the Martian crust.
00:41 Really? Well, tell me buddy, did Mars have a moon that was proportionally as large as Earth's? Because there wouldn't be life on Earth either if our moon didn't stabilize the planet's axis of rotation, causing it to wobble (like Mars does) Therefore, there wouldn't be seasons or climate zones for significant periods. But I’ll go further: Did Mars have a iron-core what generated a magnetic field strong enough to protect it from solar winds and cosmic radiation, which could destroy life on Earth in just a few days? (the Mars hasn't magnetic field already, even the core of the Mars isn't active) Did Mars have an atmosphere of adequate thickness, density, and composition to develop an ozone shield against UV radiation? (Due to its size/mass, Mars wouldn't even be able to STAND such an atmosphere) Should I continue? Or is it enough for you that there was/is water there and that’s all it takes for ‘life’?
It should still be called "earthquake", for what we refer to as earth is the soil or ground, the name of our planet is Tellus or Gaia, and it is the ground/earth that's shaking and not the planet.
mars also wouldnt be as nearly as geothermally hot, just with lack of mass. mars would be significantly easier for DEEP mining, beyond any thing seen on Earth by huge factors.
6:48 , click here and save yourself the re-telling of how Mars got started (in other words, skip the ads if you're without adblocker).
Thank you 🙏🏻
Thx
Wow, I was letting it run to find out they are fed up with illegals breaking in. Thank you.
I have AdBlock on and still can't skip some useless ads at the start of this video. I must say Google should pay for this.
The Mars Insight Lander failed to place it's "Mole" heat probe. Several attempts were made to compact the ground around the Drill sight using the robotic Arm but after 15 attempts the ground proved to be too "Clumpy" to drill and place the Heat probe. This was a main reason for the Insight mission and it was nearly scrubbed as a result.
I'm surprised to hear that NASA has enough Seismic data to determine there's so much Water under the surface, especially with only one seismic detector that never really got placed underground.
@Migglesworthall you need is an announcement and everyone gets onboard 💵
@@uuzd4s yes. It was disappointing the video didn’t mention this:
Pure science fiction garbage, to make you think NASA is giving us our money's worth for misspent tax dollars lol!
@@Magic-mushrooms113it must be true NASA said it.
A single sensor? Over extrapolation unless tech has surpassed my understanding of it.
Not saying it's wrong just skeptical.
Something stupid is happening with these titles.
InSight is discovering water beneath the surface of Mars via seismology. That's ongoing research, ergo, it's happening right now, and right there.
The retard keeps saying liquid water....
@@Yutani_Crayvenyou said ergo. Stfu.
Thanks for saving my time
Agreed.Not only the title but the picture.A water fountain spilling H20 all over the place.And all what they talk about is " Mars quakes".
FYI, when we geologists say that there are oceans inside the earth, it is not like what we see on the surface. It is water cointened in minerals and micro-fractures.
Conjecture. No current tech can determine vast deposits of water encapsulated deep within earth but the clue of such is "fossil fuels" which merely need carbon and water (hydrogen and oxygen) combined into such; maybe under extreme pressure and temperature and plasma fields if not Berkland currents. Fossil fuels are constantly regenerating; the label is misleading to suggest finite resource when it is far from that; as might well be water deep within the (hollow?) Earth.
Absolutely, which he mentions in this video.
There is a huge freshwater lake below the ice in Antarctica, Lake Vostok, similar in size to Lake Ontario in North America, according to NASA. The lake is roughly 240 km long x 50 km wide, and hundreds of meters deep. Apparently there is also thought to be a giant subglacial lake under the ice in Greenland too.
@@frglee true, but also a bit of a non sequitur to the post you were replying to.
Thank you.
in dutch we call this klik beet :)
And you would be right. If I had a 1-cent coin for every space news provider to talk about there being water on/in Mars, I'd have my own metal planet.
The Dutch go fishing with beets?
That is hilarious! I love his voice too...I can hear him saying that!
Klik beet? Snap hem niet 😂
Bedankt. Dit scheelt me tijd.
My bet is on Europe, the (highly likely) deep ocean under the icecrost may have black smokers on the deep deep bottom, with some sort of life. I'm 54 now, with a little luck I might learn before my demise, that it is indeed so. I don't know why that is so important to me, but it is. I really would close my eyes for the last time in more peace knowing that there is life outside earth. Why? I don't know, it's non tangible, but very important for me.
Life on Europe? I think so, at least in Spain.
@@David-gh6vp HAHAHA! Best laugh of my day, thanks
If you want to read something interesting, these two authors Joseph and Duvall write about Mars, Comets and the Cambrian Explosion
The Great Controversy by E G White .
@@Magic-mushrooms113 Rhawn Joseph and David Duvall? Nah. They're notorious frauds who couldn't recognize a Burgess Shale fossil if they saw one outside of a book.
Some of the video is earth deserts since there is a structure at 5:44.
what if its just a piece of nasa junk thats been covered in dirt
@@bradysam3628 😂😂😂 you're joking , right...? RIGHT ?
It is a structure, but it doesn't look artificial.
Correction. Screenshot magnification shows that it's a building...
And doesn’t it look like a bush in the yard? 😂
I was about to say the same thing.
So, nothing is happening on Mars. Too manyquestions.
Nada !! lol
What's happening on Mars is that InSight is discovering water beneath the surface via seismology. That's ongoing research, ergo, still happening.
@@anthony27334😮😅😮😮😮😮😮😊😊😮. You ZB so 9ioyk6 a pPoop----. 😅and then 😮😮😮
...meanwhile in Utah. They don't understand the planet they've had thousands of years to understand...and they live on it! Third rock from the sun.
@@Yutani_Crayven...in Maryland you can't drink rain water, when I moved to DC they issued a don't drink rain, or tap water because you can't boil out the chemicals,...they are forever. And that's the name, forever chems. Mars water...
Microbiologiat here. It is actually easy to explain why the water sank into the bedrock more than it would do on earth: the thickness of the crust. Once water gets too close to magma, it flows upwards again in a convection motion. Hence thermal vents. Since Mars has a thicker crust, water goes deeper before it gets too hot. When it goes up, it gets colder before it reaches the surface, most of the times. On Earth, these environments thrive with prokariotic life, and you can also find more complex life that feeds on bacteria, such as mussels, tubular worms, and crabs and other arthropods who feeds on those multicell organisms. I am sure we will find at least a thriving microbial ecossystem in Mars subsurface waters.
So long as life has a source of energy, it will find a way to use it. Earth has life miles deep in solid rock.
dumbas watched the video? F you, too.
we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
there is no thermal vents on Mars ...
@@tesofe Remember the OK City bombing, he was the gov Doctor there and stated that Eric Holder was in control of the bomber!
5:48 what’s that (lower right) ??? Did Saudi Arabia already build a NEOM hotel on Mars??
Both Earth and Mars should have significant quantities of connate water between the Subterranean fluid layer through layers of the mantle.
we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
@@wanttopreach Are you a bot. . . a bot. . . a bot???
Mars has "tectonics" of various types, but no "plate techtonics".
What?
@@Peeoto Mars has no plates and therefore cannot have plate tectonics, but it has other kinds of tectonics.
Water started to appear about 3.8 bil years ago on earth, and homo sapiens started to form about 300,000 years ago. It took app 3.77 bil years from Amoeba to homo sapiens. And YES earth's 5 mass extinction is considered as part of evolution.
If there is heat and water, there is life, Atleast on Earth.
There has to be a Goldilocks zone of heat it can’t be to cold nor can it be to hot access to a power source like the sun a stable environment the list goes on
@@nono-yh2vi Well that's the point. If there is heat and water that means it's not boiling evaporated water (like your sun example) or frozen water. Again, if there is heat and water together combined with amino acids and carbon compounds there is a possibility for life
@@624radicalham No, life doesn't just happen, there has to be a reason for it to be there. Any honest biologist will tell you life was engineered.
Not quite, for water to sustain life it's alkalinity must be low enough, meaning, too much salt and not enough CO2 does not allow photosynthesis to take place. Easy to test in the lab.
CO2 reduces the alkalinity, cold water promotes solubility of CO2 in water . Don't speculate, do some simple experimentation.
Three gases are required for life -- hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. Hydrogen and Oxygen make water, but also, just add Nitrogen and Carbon and you have protein and the building blocks of life. However, there are also Non-Breathing forms of life which are VERY DIFFERENT from us.
Martians-dead!-slain by the putrefactive and disease bacteria against which their systems were unprepared; slain as the red weed was being slain; slain, after all man’s devices had failed, by the humblest things that God, in his wisdom, has put upon this earth.
👍😎👍
5:42.....not a picture of mars folks, ok?
?
Yeah, that's the problem.
Yes, buildings and trees give it away. The least this guy could do is a bit of research on the topic and show an ACTUAL picture of the subject. Thumbs down for pure laziness.
Ahhh The Water Of Life in our very Solar System on Mars like Arrakis
Was preparing to say something similar 😊
@@catbertz ...and I'm thinking of big worms!! LOL ;D
we have had a domed complex and man on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
I wish I could just get the news about mars without the history lesson every single time.
Ditto. And to think this "history lesson" is far from confirmed.
Did I pass
"Biology as we know it" That's one line that instantly tells me that I'm listening to a smart person speak.
As a biologist, I have to object. There is pretty little leeway to build a self-replicating system from this universe's chemistry, particularly if it needs to be a) error-correcting in its replication, but b) not so much that it cannot evolve. In other words, the odds of any "biology unlike we know it" are really close to zero.
A Martian organism would probably use slightly different bases, or even something that is chemically very different but informationally equivalent, for its genetic apparatus, but considering the known (i.e. Terran) biodiversity, and considering that it all started from some clayey muck and a bit of dirty water, the fact remains that at least in the one case we know, all life has a common origin, which is just one of the numerous theoretical possibility to build a living system from the components we naurally find have on a Goldilocks planet such as ours. And we are as sure as one can get in such hard-to-study cases that there once was RNA-based life, but it was fully displaced with DNA-based organisms.
So "biology as we know it" has a proven and very massive selective advantage, and anyone who tells you that "biology utterly unlike we know it" is more than a remote and *very* theoretical possibility - more so on extremely Earth-like planets like early Mars - is a gullible fool who has no clue whatsoever about biology:
Natural selection among the very first organisms on Earth was so unforgiving that even the harshest conditions found at present are a walk in the park by comparison, and most of the theoretically possible biochemical pathways are simply not competitive in any way compared to those that ultimately established themselves: for example, nothing life on Earth ever tried - and life on Earth tried A LOT - comes even remotely close to high-energy phosphate bonds as a means to store biochemical energy under Earth conditions - and for early Martian conditions it holds true just the same. Similarly, a 3-element codon allows to encode for the whole range of amino acids needed by an organism, while 2 elements is insufficient, and 4 is wasteful... biologically, Martian life can be expected to be a close parallel to Terran life, using different compounds but structurally much the same (cells with compartments and some kind of genetic material consisting of a backbone element and 4- or maybe 3-nary coding compounds arranged in 3- or maybe 4-element codons). Probably, remnant Martian life in crustal water would be simplified compared to terrestrial life, due to the paucity of (especially organic) chemistry down there - on Earth the crustal microbiome is still connected to the surface one.
So very interesting and exciting!
Mars won't just stop surprising us😅. This is a great video. It'd be interesting to see what happens when a sample is drilled from those martian underground rocks.
we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
Don't bother waiting, it's really deep down and automated drilling technology to work on Mars will take another generation or two - and by then, we have too much of a problem on Earth to waste any thoughts on Mars.
@@wanttopreach Somehow I can understand what you sayd...
Mars lost it's magnetic field and the solar winds ripped the atmosphere away and with no atmosphere there is no pressure to retain the water.
That's what many people forget. It is not hard to pocure an aqueous liquid in some quantity on Mars (even though it would really be much like very aggressive bleach, not water), and the new seismic data is best explained by deep rocks being essentially like a sponge for fossil water. But there is no conceivable way to recover this (probably less contaminated) water anytime soon. And as soon as any Martian water is on the surface, it just evaporates away, leaving you with highly toxic sludge that will corrode most substances.
Mars is pretty harmless when it's dry - the regolith is well-weathered dust much like in the least hospitable parts of an Atacama desert evaporational basin, but even drier. Rovers and similar equipment can operate on it for years - Luna, with its extremely abrasive regolith, will ruin most complex equipment within months if not weeks; the stuff can (due to its electrostatic charges) even creep into "airtight" seals.
But once you wet Mars with plain old H2O, it becomes as destructive as Venus if not more so (albeit for chemically quite different reasons - but equipment failures would likely happen in a similar way. Saturated cold perchlorate solution is not that different from boiling sulfuric acid in its effect on organic materials).
IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS NO SIGN ANYWHERE OF EVER HAVING ANY INTELLIGENT LIFE….
😮
Trust me its better this way... but microbial life exist almost everywhere in space!
Canals on mars are especially nuts.. and how did they have old maps of those back in the early days is a mystery..
Poor resolution of telescopes in the 1800's and probably poor eyesight and excessive enthusiasm of Percival Lowell.
There may be places on Mars where water is much more closer to the surface, there also may be usable gasses underground.
If Mars has that much water underground, could there be some form of life hiding deep beneath the surface?
I am wondering too
Little clue for you: Humans have a biorhythm of 25 not 24 hours periodicity; aligned more to Mars then Earth. We reset daily with exposure to solar spectra; not merely visible light; as we used to on Mars for millennia. We are still evolving to reconcile the difference. As for "hiding" I would use "out of sight" as the better descriptor; as also applies to our "Moon."
All that water is now in earth's oceans as Mars passed us by on its way to its present orbit and deposited it during the flood. We have had man and a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
Theoretically yes, it would be archaean-like microbes. On Earth we find (very few and highly adapted) bacteria in the "fossil water" in the deeper crust's fractures. There is no inherent reason why these should not also exist on Mars, given that life on the Martian surface had enough time to evolve to this stage, and then simply retreat down into the crust as the planet's core cooled and the surface water evaporated or froze. For recent reviews, see Sar et al's 2019 paper "Deep Biosphere", and "Microbial Life in Deep Terrestrial Continental Crust" by Kazy et al (2021), which are by the same research group. Suffice to say that there are crustal-water microbes utilizing iron, chloride, and carbon dioxide metabolism, which would work on Mars just as well.
Unfortunately, the Martian surface is so favorable for aeolian and chemical erosion that even molecular traces of life are unlikely to survive, and any molecular "biosignature" we'd find is unlikely to be genuine instead of some fairly recent product of an exoctic abiotic chemical reaction. Any surving life on Mars is very likely far below the surface, and effectively inaccessible until there is sustained habitation on Mars that could manufacture the equipment needed to bore so far down... that is to say, it's unlikely that we wll lever find it, because even if such a colony could persist, it would imply a thriving population of introduced terrestrial microbes that would contaminate everything... kinda hard to search for a an entirely unknown form of life if your equipment teems with known forms of life.
There is.
You don't seem to know this, but there is geological evidence that something collided with Mars and that it was partially resurfaced. Do some homework! Cheers!
they also got the whole pressure cooker thing wrong... the sun evaporates water. water vapor rises from the heat from the planet's surface. the water becomes clouds. the huge mystery about mars's atmoshpere being gone is the fucking magnetosphere weakened. we already know this information. the core cooled down, solidified, lost its convectional forces creating the magnetosphere via the dynamo effect, solar winds stripped the atmosphere away like the fucking big bad wolf, taking the water in the air away with it over a long period of time, chipping away at all available water. im no genius, im no astronomer, but ive heard it from enough sources to know that a lot of people seem to agree that this is the fucking reason, and its tangible and realistic. for a channel focused on space science, im very disappointed they get all these things wrong.
sorry to go off like that, its not directed at you pointandshoot lol
No kidding. Mars has had far more collisions than our good Earth, being so much closer to the Asteroid Belt. Look at the great basins on Mars. Those were from asteroids colliding, likely causing not only cratering, but valleys, cracks, and temporary flows of water. . .
I got that written in my meteorite!!! Some sort of atomic explosions happened in Mars!!! Also whatever did this will be on the way to do same with planet Earth in near future!
5:44 seconds. Bro are you showing aliens
Mars also once had a more powerful magnetic field. That magnetic field protected the atmosphere and much of the surface water. Underground water, with minerals and heat from the still partially lava like core - might mean life underground on mars.
Actually no. The magnetic traces left in the geology of Mars indicate that it's magnetic field wasn't ever very strong (because it's a small planet 1:10th the size of Earth), and died out early. Then it was "goodbye atmosphere".
No one is going to Mars. Period. We can't get even two astronauts stuck in our own orbit back to earth. Mankind is not ready for space exploration.
YOU are the only one with common sense. I agree with you 100%
YEP‼️‼️👍
Even though merely n = 1, Mankind has an abysmal record when it comes to NOT ruining habitable planets.
Then the human species will go extinct on Earth. It may be by asteroid impact (Pick a dice set for odds of around 1:100 million. Roll once a year.), or much more likely, by destroying our own environment.
Do you know the "Fermi Paradox"? "Where is everyone?" I think the answer is clear : most species destroy their environment with their technologies before they get into space and manage to get away from their own pollution. Hence, no aliens.
Van Allen belt is the furthest we could ever get period! After this is DEATH...
Long story short, Mars isn't habitable. The moon isn't made of cheese, and if you get an itch, don't scratch Uranus
Venus is an intruder Planet; it did not originate from our sun. Titan, a moon of Saturn, is another candidate as an intruder. Uranus lays on it's side, has a dual-center magnetic field, and retrograde motion. I suspect that Uranus was penetrated by a metallic, highly charged, intruder, which remains there today. ALL (almost all) of the inhabited worlds of space are evolutionary. Evolution is one of God's creative techniques. Life on Earth was formulated using only what was available on Earth already.
Basically, Iron and salty water -- of course, by Iron, I mean all the elements of Ur. Salt Water = An Tia = LIGHT.
5:46 video of Earth . Square building and Stock Yard.
How are you certain it’s a video of earth?
@@livewellherenow because you confirmed my suspicions in a video that you have since deleted from your RUclips channel. Why did you delete it? I thought it was great.
It might have been worth mentioning that Mars used to have a magnetosphere in its youth, but some catastrophic event or other (presumably an impact with a planetoid/ moon sized object) resulted in the loss of this atmosphere-protecting shield.
It shouldn't have been a surprise at all, especially given that the same thing has been found here in Earth's crust. The amount of water locked inside the Earth's crust is more than four times the amount on the surface. This helps to explain the origins of some of the biggest and deepest sinkholes that show up out of nowhere. If the crust of the planet shifts constantly, gravity brings the water down deeper and deeper. This also helps to keep the upper crust cool enough to live on. The water inside the crust permeates everything - rock, gas, and minerals. The water is in constant motion, even though we can't observe it moving, we can see its effects. The real question is, can life survive at depth inside the crust? Since life can survive in deep space, it probably can survive there as well, although we may have a hard time finding and recognizing it, since it may be dormant and hard to distinguish from its surroundings. This may be the reason that we've missed it on Mars - it's just very difficult to identify. Since there have been many discoveries of the building blocks for life in deep space, life could be everywhere, and we've just not been able to identify it yet in its current form.
At 6:27 " ... places where the waves slow down would indicate higher densities." Wrong. Waves travel faster in higher density material. The speed of sound is 4x higher in water than in the air.
A captivating visual presentation -- is this -- of prosaic scientific facts. Its illuminating unfolding of informatiom about Mars facilitates exploration of personal inner space.
government lies! we have had a domed complex on Mars sence the 70s. This comes from a man that has had a class X security clearance. Our Aurora space fleet was discontinued in 2012 because they took 6 weeks to get to Mars, The new fleet takes 3 weeks. You are part of the second tier science. They are first tier. Even the computers they use are 1000 X better then what they let us see or use!
There may be fossils of organisms underground on Mars, such as fossils of organisms similar to dinosaurs.
as stated in a comment on one of your last mars videos.. theres ample, ample evidence for plate tectonics. it's very similar to the argument about water that lasted up until the 2000s
still love the video
No, "tectonics". Not "plate tectonics" which require at least a viscous mantle which is more dense than the crust plates. Mars does not have that.
@@willietorben560 a history of it. Yes
Judging by the video's thumbnail, Mars has turned into a fresh pumpkin recently picked from the vine.
Insane discovery right here
It's almost like the shell the crust of Mars is acting as the "atmosphere." Protecting that water from evaporating
Its almost like it is an uninhabitable area on earth and it needs exploring. Ooh wait we are on mars, my bad. The shadows will get you everytime
The Northern (Boreal) Basin on Mars is a large impact crater.
The problem with Mars is it lacks an Iron core. This deprives it not only of a magnetic shield, but also sufficient gravity to hold an Oxygen atmosphere close to the surface for very long. Simply put most of the planet's Oxygen drifted off into space eons ago. Even is a way was found to replenish it, without increasing the planet's gravity it would all just float away into space again. As you say, without the pressure of an atmosphere to hold it, any liquid water also turns into vapor and floats up and away.
Whatching anything outer space is kinda like watching wwf wrestling
Have you heard of plasma tunneling? There's a new effort to dig deeper than we could before by literally just using a hot stream of plasma that doesn't need to be brought back up to the Earth's surface so you can dig away faster than before. We're talking being able to dig to geothermal energy in 90 days.
"Just like earth" is a wild exaggeration. If Mars formed at about the same time as earth and then dried out, there wasn't enough time for life "just like earth" to develop. True there might have developed single cell organisms but that would have been about the limit.
Sry to say this but I think it actually got way further from multi cell organism's and then something happened... also It happened in Mars not as collision but more like atomic explosions!
I know it's he's trying to estimate, but a kilometer is not half of a mile.
Thankyou for these insights. I liatened to the end.
Very interesting. Thank you.
Just from reading the title... I thought mars was turning into austin
Something weird is happening with all these cartoons the title should read.
They could put a giant magnifying glass in orrbit to magnify the sun's rays and melt the mars surface ice.
In theory you can, but that would be wasting a lot of resources - without magnetoshpere atmosphere is taken out by solar wind, so the effect would be temporary.
Why, so it would all evaporate into space!
Mars is super super strange.. lots of things in the geology these that i cant fathem..
Check the video at exactly 5:48 center right, there's what seems like a square structure with what looks like some pillars on the floor forming what seems like ruins.
Thank you
I would guess that once Mars cooled enough, water simply went underground and filled lava chambers and tunnels that were no longer filled with magma. If so, that also devastated the atmosphere. Mars never had plate tectonics, empty lava chambers maybe huge - and there might be plenty of them.
If you want to find life out of Earth, the Europa and Titan moons are the best candidates than Mars, as there's a huge ocean under the ice crust.
Yup, and maybe "big things" in it, according to the great movie "Europa one", worth a look if you have not seen it! ;D
I have watched a shit ton of these types of videos and really paid off since i’m basically Acing science because of them
Yes! We should expect to be surprised!! Love this!
The closer to the core of mars you get the higher the ambient air pressure, liquid water can exist about 5km underground in caves on mars, or maybe a couple thousand metres down from the deepest canyon.
Yes!! Brilliant. Liquid brine does flow from time to time on slopes, very briefly, but long enough to flow ~1000 meters before evaporating. Water [dew] has formed briefly on landers, and then quickly evaporate/sublimated away. The deep canyons you mention [or deep depressions like Argyre or Hellas] likely are within a km or two of liquid water. [note: as you may already know, vapor has been recorded in canyon systems, and mountain summits.]
deepest hole on earth is 8 miles deep, you want to believe guys know what the core of mars is made of and what the cores of the moons of jupiter are made on okay
Maybe that structure at 5:43 in the video is a pumping station to get the water back to the surface.
Thanks for this interesting video.
If Mars has Old water in it's basement it will probably get mold. Moldy Mold.
Life, apart from Bacteria, didn't start on earth until 542 million years ago. But we have already found life on Mars.
I know! I have found life from Mars...
Those huge volcanoes bleed the core dry hence less gravity and once the smoke left or settled so the surface was less atmosphere so it went underground
The Moon is about one billion years older than Earth. That means that there was no collision between two bodies that created the Earth and the Moon, together.
Can you please give me a link to the study where this is stated? Ive never heard this before...i call BS
@@jonnybabich9667 You love Rock music you never believe anything...
Nice to see a science video that's not AI generated. Good job!
I keep wondering whether the lack of a moon large enough to keep a fluid mantle on Mars was the reason for its core to freeze, then the planet lost its magnetosphere, and this being the reason for the atmosphere to get swept away in a solar storm.
That's actually pretty smart.
This implies that you think the Earth's Moon is, somehow, "keeping" the [Earth's] mantle fluid. That needs more justification.
When you're talking about events more than a few kilometres fomr the surface, the main control on events is the planet's own stores and sources of heat, not what comes in from the Sun. That doesn't have an important effect more than a few km from the surface.
There's no need for complex physics in this. Mars is, as most people know (I hope!) "half the size of Earth". 3396 vs 6371 km radius, ratio 0.53. But that's the linear measure. In VOLUME that means that Mars is 0.53^3=0.151 (~=6.6:1) of the *volume* of Earth.
Worse, Mars is too small to experience much internal compression, so the *mass* ratio is even worse : 5.97 (Earth) vs 0.642 (Mars) in units of 10^24 kg, a *mass* ratio of 0.107 (9.29:1 - almost 10:1).
Since space big, really really big, it doesn't warm up (measurably) from planets cooling into it and the *main* control on how long it takes for the heat of construction of a planet to flow away is the planet's mass. Earth is (after 4.5 billion years) leaking, approximately, equal amounts of "primordial heat" (from the energy of impacts constructing the planet) and "radiogenic heat" (produced by radioactivity), so one would expect Mars to have cooled to a similar state after 0.45 billion years. Which is, indeed, the approximate time that the planet lost it's magnetic field, and steadily thereafter, it's atmosphere. (I'm assuming that Mars and Earth have broadly similar compositions ; which from the minerals seen by the various rovers, is a reasonable position.)
Mars is a MUCH smaller planet than Earth. Most people see the "radius is one half" figure and think it is "half the size of Earth". But in terms of mass, and so thermal history, Mars is closer to *1/10th* the size of Earth. And most people don't remember that - they use the irrelevant "half the radius" number to frame their expectations.
Humans aren't very good at estimating things. That's why we invented maths, and then physics.
Someone or some thing is responsible...! I got meteorite from Mars which got remnants in it from atomic explosions...
@@ETSpaceRocks Why do you think that "your" meteorite has atomic explosion remnants? Which isotope decays did you collect. And do you have the calibration records from the isotope energy measuring device, for before and after your sample was tested?
(If you don't have that data, then the person who sold you the meteorite may well have been lying to you. It happens. Sorry.)
@@a.karley4672 I have seen some isotopes movement that I did manage to record under digital microscope iver couple of times! Got fiew video's posted!
5:57-6:03 almost made me go hungry and crave a Snickers bar.
6:29 The "point where waves slow down" is a lesser density not greater. Mechanical wave propagation is faster in denser materials.
I can remember the time when people still thought there may be canals on Mars.
There is much more about Mars than one may think. Put a large enough mass in orbit around Mars, and the core will start producing a heavier gravity. A mass about the size of our moon but smaller.
7:30 Yeah, but that water is locked in rocks. No actual ocean.
With that much water there is a potential to terraform an atmosphere.
Marvin the Martians toilet backed up 🤣🤣🤣
Earth has plenty of large underground water reservoirs, I firmly believe that Mars also will have these as well. We already know for a fact that Mars has lava tubes and underground caverns since roof sections have collapsed on some allowing us a peek into the space below. It doesn't take a great leap of imagination to see some of these caverns/tubes having been filled with water while Mars was wet and warm.
When aliens turn up they'll be boring nerds.
I for one, welcome our new water Martian underlords 🙇♂️
In this video starting at 5:43 you can clearly see a farm settlement with buildings and growing areas.
This changes the possibilities for inhabiting Mars. Build as deep beneath the surface as is feasible to create habitable spaces isolated from the radiation and extreme temperature cycles that make the surface so inhospitable. Then, drill deeper to access water, which may even be warm enough to be a useful energy source (if not for generation of electricity, then at least for maintaining livable temperatures). With a nuclear
power-source for the short-term, you could support agriculture, industry, and science, all in relative safety and comfort. Sure, the initial set-up would be more difficult and expensive, but the return on the investment would be massive. Pumping water to the surface could theoretically also be used to increase the density of the atmosphere, perhaps bringing true terraforming into the realm of feasibility...
be safe mars
Without scientific evidence. I've always had this feeling, the water went towards the core. The same as the Nullarbor Plain with limestone aquifer. The lava tubes. No volcanic gas, which escaped.
I just have had this feeling.
Let's Terraform Mars and get to Mining it.
Why so far? Let's start from the mooon at first.
I think I saw a sign that said "Dr. Walter Brown was here"
What if Martians don't want Mars to be terraformed?
Mars is most likely giving birth, probably to a gigantic dragon, like the one in the desert that is 2 thousand miles long. That is all.
If Mars has one of the biggest volcanos, then it must have the biggest lava tubes to store water 💧.
You need to read up on the latest data on the moon. You will see your collision theory is not valid anymore and damn near impossible...
Total recall comes to mind
Mars has a different PH than Earth. The h2o would have a high alkaline level, something like acidic but opposite. Venus is more acidic than Earth. Both can dissolve things like acid.
2:18 - Actuall the frozen poles (CO2 and water ice there) are subject to sublimation and solar wind stripaway too. Especially in Martian summers more ice sublimates always keeping some ableit little in the atmosphere.
It was just assumed that these are the last remnants (still stripping away).
Which I personally for a long time thought that it didn't account for water soaking down into the depths of the Martian crust.
It's had moisture. It's very humid. And we've had settlements there many years
5:50 Martian civilization confirmed? Jk... dude how did you not notice the building in this stock video? Lmao.
00:41 Really? Well, tell me buddy, did Mars have a moon that was proportionally as large as Earth's? Because there wouldn't be life on Earth either if our moon didn't stabilize the planet's axis of rotation, causing it to wobble (like Mars does) Therefore, there wouldn't be seasons or climate zones for significant periods. But I’ll go further: Did Mars have a iron-core what generated a magnetic field strong enough to protect it from solar winds and cosmic radiation, which could destroy life on Earth in just a few days? (the Mars hasn't magnetic field already, even the core of the Mars isn't active) Did Mars have an atmosphere of adequate thickness, density, and composition to develop an ozone shield against UV radiation? (Due to its size/mass, Mars wouldn't even be able to STAND such an atmosphere) Should I continue? Or is it enough for you that there was/is water there and that’s all it takes for ‘life’?
Ever wonder why people such as myself understood and chronicled things like this… 8-10 years ago?
Mars does NOT have ' one continuous shell ' do you think the vents of Olympus Mons just stop at the surface lol
What's the outpost at 5:42? Is this footage of Earth pretending to be Mars? Or is it CGI?
It should still be called "earthquake", for what we refer to as earth is the soil or ground, the name of our planet is Tellus or Gaia, and it is the ground/earth that's shaking and not the planet.
mars also wouldnt be as nearly as geothermally hot, just with lack of mass. mars would be significantly easier for DEEP mining, beyond any thing seen on Earth by huge factors.