Mikel Arteta & Andoni Iraola on VAR controversy in Arsenal's win over Bournemouth
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 май 2024
- ► Subscribe to Sky Sports News: bit.ly/SkySportsNewsSub
Mikel Arteta and Andoni Iraola react to Arsenal's 3-0 win over Bournemouth on Saturday.
Bukayo Saka put the Gunners ahead from the penalty spot in a one-sided first half before Leandro Trossard swept home their second following a spell of Bournemouth pressure after the break.
The visitors had a goal controversially ruled out after that, with VAR upholding referee David Coote's decision to penalise Dominic Solanke for a foul on David Raya, before Declan Rice added a stoppage-time third to put the result beyond doubt.
#SkySportsNews #SkySports #PremierLeague
► For the latest developments on this story: qrcode.skysports.com/skysport...
More from Sky Sports on RUclips:
► Sky Sports Retro: bit.ly/SkySportsRetroSub
► Sky Sports: bit.ly/SkySportsSub
► Sky Sports Football: bit.ly/SSFootballSub
► Sky Sports Boxing: bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
► Sky Sports F1: bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
► Sky Sports Cricket: bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
► Sky Sports Golf: bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf
► To enquire about licensing Sky Sports News content, you can find out more here: www.skysports.com/more-sports... 
Спорт
Bournemouth were lucky to have 10 players on the pitch. VAR didn’t even look at the tackle on Saka’s knee. Shambolic.
He hold Raya's hand before Raya punched the ball out. The VAR decision has no wrong about it.
There was a foul on Billing before Solanke touched Raya.
Exactly, I distinctly remember when Arsenal had a goal disallowed last season from a corner when VAR adjudged that Ben White was holding on to the goalie’s arm (which the on-field ref didn’t see). And there wasn’t massive outrage in the media and online that the goal was disallowed, it barely got a mention. Everyone accepted the decision.
The difference yesterday is that the referee actually saw the holding himself and disallowed the goal on the field, so VAR simply upheld the decision because there was clear evidence of holding on review.
@@nathanhenry7692On first viewing, that's what I thought. I thought, no goal (blatant body check by Solanke), but a pen for the pull back on Billing. However, upon seeing the replay I think no penalty. Billing puts his hand out to push away the Arsenal defender, and their arms get tangled. At no point does the Arsenal defender actually grab him, so no penalty.
The worst decisions I’ve ever seen in a game, for BOTH teams!
The referee on the field gave the penalty and disallowed the Bournemouth goal, so the on-field decision stood in both cases. The referee also decided not to give a red card or even a yellow to Christie for that awful tackle and VAR didn’t intervene. This is the same way the on-field decision stood when Gordon’s goal against Arsenal was given despite the ball going out of play plus the push in the back on Gabriel, and everybody (except Arsenal people) praised VAR for not overturning the goal.
If you don’t like the decisions, you should be pointing at the referee, not VAR. Because if there was no VAR, the score line would have still been 3-0 yesterday. Simple as.
Btw, it looked like a pen if you watched the action in real time at full speed, so it’s a pen. The goalie took Kai out with his leg, even though the contact wasn’t huge, it was a desperate lunge from the goalkeeper.
So you wanna win unfairly. Also the ball was not out before isak touched it so saying lies
@@jackhe3209 You should be answering your own question mate?! Do you want to win unfairly? How about the two-handed push in the back on Gabriel? No mention of that from you?
There was absolutely nothing unfair about that result yesterday. Even Iraola said that Arsenal were the better team and deserved to win the match.
There was no foul on Harvetz..He initiated the contact himself..
Bournemouth also escaped a high leg knock red card
Epl Referees need to improve
How can he initiate the contact when the keep comes out like that, how do you expect everyone to run or lit their legs grow up
Sorry, but that's entirely untrue. The GK slides right into Havertz's path. Havertz actually hurdles him with his front foot (which still gets knicked), and then drags his trailing leg to ensure there's contact. It's not the responsibility of the player with the ball to jump over reckless challenges, which is precisely what this was.
The goalkeeper made an attempt to get the ball, he missed, left his leg out which impedes Havertz. But because Havertz didn’t move his leg out of the way, it’s a dive?
So are we saying strikers/ players have an obligation to move their legs out of the way when they are obstructed?
Who takes strides like that? Almost like a forward moonwalk, scraping his toes across the floor just to make contact
@@pabloshicoan5195 ohhhh so it’s about the stride of a player? The referee and VAR are really trash that they didn’t assess the stride of a 6ft 4 athlete better. Thanks for clearing that one up 🙄
@lorraineb7016 who runs scraping the top of their toes across the floor?
@@pabloshicoan5195 oh so it’s not about the stride, it’s about how his boot touches the grass? Is that right?
@lorraineb7016 Are you high on your dad's ass fumes? As he strides he scrapes the top of his toes across the grass waiting for contact watch the video you absolute drip. What a reject of a clown you are, this is why you, your fans and your teams deserve to win nothing
Simple. It wasn't a penalty since Havertz dived. But Bournemouth should've been 10 men
115 shut up you robbed Brighton,,,,,
@@entertainmentpurposesz.a Wtf???? He is talking facts. How about you put your idiotic agendas aside and actually open your eyes. Also, Bournemouth should have had a pen for the Saliba pull on Billing during the goal incident for Bournemouth.
@@dantralius9269 what about the red card before all the idiotic claims you are saying .... you such a c,unt
What about the city charges. Biggest robbery@@dantralius9269
I don't see any need to talk about var incidents, "will it change anything now" 🤔
Was it a penalty or not, "what's the point",🤔
Was it a red card on Saka, "does it matter now"🤔
What does matter now is did we got 3 points, "oh yes that matter"😂😂😂😂😂
And all the haters are sulking and crying 😆
They always mourn when it's Arsenal. We had our star boy nocked by their player without any card but we moved on 😂😂😂😂😂
Is the Bournemouth manger ok
The penalty was not penalty
It was 😂
It wasnt
No doubt VAR is a disaster If they gave the red card then there wouldn't have been a discussion now In any case they have also cost Arsenal the title All points dropped are due to poor officiating besides the Aston Villa loss all other points dropped because of refs
You mean the second Aston Villa loss at the Emirates? Also, the Fulham loss was fair and square. Other losses were filled with controversial decisions that went against Arsenal.
@@iykeharrison9161Also the first Villa match and Newcastle
@@Menez7_ I already said that
Harry Kane does this all the time. The keeper makes a challenge and misses the ball. Its not the attackers responsibility to avoid the the challenge. You cant applaud it when Kane does it then criticise other players for doing. Eagerly waiting for Kane to do this in the euros to see the response then.
Is it still VAR controversy or just corruption… the way similar incidents are called differently in different games, for different teams screams fraud
When Arsenal final second and Villa win the Europa, Villa will had a better season aka West Ham also.
Teams gassing up the conference trophy 😂 embarrassing
@@CamMackay96 second is never remembered. Trophy's are which ever Micky mouse cup it is.
Keeper interference is a foul and contact with the striker is a foul. Those are the rules and Zirbi knows this. If his keeper was interfered with or his player got the penalty he would adamantly defend these.
I do wish managers would cut out the hypocrisy.
How about the foul on Saka which deserved a red card? Are we ignoring this?
Arsenal have a number of divers in their team - Saka literally has 99 rating for simulation.
It is a pen
He don't like VAR unless it's helping his team ARSE N ALL
Twins!
As a Arsenal Fan that was not Penalty for me.
Then ur not a football fan at all
They look like twins😂
Varsenal😑😑😑
Clearly VAR is bent on majority of dispatches to the ropey car park. Games controlled from outside the ground in a little van 🚐 remember boxing back in the day
They look so similar😂
Haters cry more .... red card not given, 50/50
In some very weird karma like way, both teams got screwed so naturally it equals out, Bournemouth should have been down to 10 men so the football gods gave us a pen as an apology. Makes sense to me
Irony arsenal fans siding with VAR after they wouldnt sut up for months about Newcastle perfectly good goal
It only pains coz it's against you,when it's support you then it's correct 💯,
They should have a red card before penalty incident cry more
But you guys sided with VAR then and asked Arsenal fans to shut up. So you should shut up now because it was a perfectly clear penalty. VAR got it right.
See how that works?
You know that goal isn’t a goal 😂
Perfectly good goal? It was offside, the ball was out of play and it should have been a free kick for Arsenal thats 3 different situations the ref could have blown the whistle for.
VAR serves no purpose.Let refs be responsible for the game instead of shifting blame to VAR where the game is decided by people who already have an opinion to set.
So many unfair decisions by VAR + referees has been against Arsenal for decades now and it hasn't been a controversial but, the moment it doesn't favour their favourite teams, it will be a non stop discussion/complain all over media. Hypocrites
Been against ARSEnal??? What World are you living on?
@@pabloshicoan5195 I should ask you that question. Or maybe you should ask yourself that question.
@@candyzeferino4170 VAR is sponsored by Prime
The Kai Havertz one was literally a copy & paste of the Bukayo Saka and Neuer incident in the UCL at the Emirates. Luckily it was UEFA referees who were on the VAR duty. Unless VARsenal would've got a penalty there as well. And the disallowed B'mouth goal because Raya got fouled, let's take a look at Vicario at Spurs. He gets bullied weekly but he needs to get stronger. But when it happens to a VARsenal player, god that's a foul 😂😂
VAR just scared to hear "This is a disgrace..."
So they give whatever VARsenal wants in a VAR decision
So ridiculous how the officiating works in the EPL 💀
Edit: I'm not a Spurs fan. Plus Alisson also got covered by VAR, when the same kind of situation happened to him back in December, against City
Ah diddums...
I'll tell you what pal, why don't you write a book about it?
Lol stop crying, we lost points against Villa and Newcastle that would have won us the league for certain
VARsenal????????? you forgot how Arsenal punished by VAR from the newcastle favour
@@whatthehead You must have been living under a rock mate. All these VARsenal stuff started ever after VARsenal had been the baby of VAR ever since that scenario. Because VAR is just scared to hear the crybaby crying "This is a disgrace" on repeat. Newcastle was the only con, which affected Arsenal. But they benefited from VAR for no reason multiple times ever since. Prove me wrong
Keep in mind that even if VAR gave the correct decision in that Newcastle game, it'd still end up as a 0-0 draw. So just a point ain't gonna benefit Arsenal for the title charge anw. Cuz City will win all the 3 matches left for them, and end of the story
@@sasiruvirajith935 How VAR started benefited Arsenal for no reason multiple times and you say the VAR gave the correct decision for the Newcastle call is clearly living in the delusion
Does Iraola have anything to say about the blatant red card on Saka? Definite pen on Havertz watch it in real time its reckless. Solanke makes no intention for the ball and nudges Raya. He is not allowed to make any contact especially in that way.
Considering vicario gets abused in the box regularly it's a controversial decision (not a spurs fan)
@danielca3 There's a difference between pushing or nodging a keeper while he is in motion of winning a ball, and just standing in front of a keeper to make it difficult for them to come claim a ball. The first is a foul, the second isn't.
@@danielca3 That's the legit point. I'm not a Spurs fan either, but that's what everybody points out. When Vicario gets bullied weekly, refs go with he needs to be stronger, when Raya got tangled a little bit, god that's a foul 💀
Havertz dived and the Bournemouth goal should have stood as there was barely any contact. There was also a foul on a Bournemouth player in the box before that so it should have ether been a penalty or a goal for Bournemouth
@lewisbush9566 high studs left Saka bleeding should've been a red too
Ever notice when Arteta looses and he is in a standing position , when being inyerviewed he ŕocks from left to right.😂😅😅
is he joking! you should have seen the penatly bayern got, why is no one talking about the blatent red that bournmouth should have had after 10 mins?
Of course, it was a penalty. They are just angry that it was given to Arsenal. It wouldn't have caused any problem if Bournemouth had been awarded the penalty for a similar incident
Am first one to watch.
I will be there to laugh at the ARROGANT FARTETA, when they loose the League 😎
Is Arteta a failure if he fails to win the league this season again?
Are the 19 teams below City failures if they fail to win the league again?
@@3bladeninja21 well you didn’t answer the question so we move 😂
@@TKSFamily well you didn’t answer the question so we move
@@3bladeninja21 👍🏿
No