Civil Procedure with UVA Law Professor Ben Spencer
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 окт 2015
- An expert in the field of civil procedure and federal jurisdiction, Professor A. Benjamin Spencer gives a classroom lecture on venue in the federal district courts. (University of Virginia School of Law, Sept. 22, 2015)
Who's watching in 2024? Thank you, Dean Spencer. We miss you at UVA!
what a clarity in your voice professor Spencer! Thank you.
Professor Spencer is doing a great job.
Thank you so much for this video!
I wonder if we can view all of his lectures?
great university professors in the law school
Are there any subsequent videos to this one?
Thanks UV. This was great. Prof is knowledgeable. Can you upload more?
I love him!!!
Hello sheena
I was confused in the beginning but then it flowed.
It wasn’t the best intro
Civil Procedure looks like a harder class than Contracts but Property looks harder than Civil Procedure and Contracts.
How to make breaf or zeast of criminal case file
Plz tell
All topics and point
Advocate
R charan
I hope at law school they go over vocabulary. Because I had no Idea of what the professor was saying
You pick it up as you go progress in your education. It is all about exposure.
@@philipmathew6239 I love your response
I have a feeling a good plaintiff lawyer would try to keep this case in Virginia. Does anyone know how ? :)
8:54
It is hard to read the professor,s writting because he is using a chalkboard instead of a dray-erase board and a marker to write.
Its pretty much using logic right?
I was hoping the professor would differentiate between subject-matter jurisdiction and supplemental jurisdiction. Also, my understanding is if there is a long arm statute in place, then the trier of fact can exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and the rest of the personal jurisdiction analysis doesn't need to be analyzed.
Subject matter jurisdiction is just referring to whether the type of case can be heard by a federal or state court. Supplemental jurisdiction would be for example if you had a federal case because the case arose from a constitutional issue but you had a related claim under state law then that state law claim could also be tacked on and heard in federal court
To your last point, even if a state has a statutory basis for personal jurisdiction, an analysis of the constitutional amenability of such exercise of pj is still necessary
@@blackmancanjump23 are you into talking about judicial interpretation? I’ll love to chat on it
Born a lawyer
dash of your personality, please.
His non-verbal communication makes it seem like he isn’t interested in being there. The subject matter and clarity is fantastic though.
Sucks this is MONO not STEREO....good job technician!!!
English?
Thanks yall civ pro professor!? LAWD, thank God I didn't go to UVA, I may do something extreme and outrageous and find myself liable for a tort.....[a joke, but yes, your civ pro professor is eye candy]
With all due respect when you start talking about venue and districts and confusing it with jurisdiction, I just think the way you graded it will confuse people just my two. Cents.
I think the students are pretty darn smart and I understand venue is one thing has nothing to do with jurisdiction in the way you put it. I had to listen to it a few times again just my two. Cents.
But aren’t all “districts” really w/in the 1 square mile of the District of Columbia, really doing business as - on other geographical locations or “States”?
Why does he seem irritated by what he is doing?
Does the chalk make anyone else cringe
Geez does this guy even want to teach...?