4:43 Who could buy Chrome ? Let me guess, a trillionaire close to Trump, appeared with him in his rallies, who is already a contractor and will have a position in his administration ?
People CHOOSE to use chrome and google search because, yes, it is better. With THAT being said, the US government should crack down on the data collection and exploitation instead.
When a company becomes too big, it's the responsibility of the government to break it up. Otherwise the company becomes too powerful and monopolizes the market which then leads to abuse of power. Google was supposed to have been broken up a long time ago, the only reason it made it this far is corruption.
About effen time. This monopoly should have been broken up over 10 years ago. The normal people lose when there are monopolies, and people benefit when companies have multiple competitors.
the USD is the international currency because of its strong anti-corruption practices, making it a reliable currency. You are welcome to use whatever else you like, the US doesn't require anyone to use USD, its just probably going to be more volatile and US companies probably won't bother working with it - but you don't have to work with them if you don't want to.
Recent strikes in the film and movie industry by actors, content producers not earning from.digital media companies should guide and inform Google and other large tech giants on allowing revenue models for content suppliers or related.
The market domination is customer driven. Hence supply & demand, its a basic economic principle but it seems the DOJ can't understand that. I guess people who focus on punishing, can't grasp the concept of basic business practise, they probably shouldn't stick their nose into area's that don't apply to them. I can't be illegal to supply people with a well known search engine.
If Google paid some ofs its content suppliers it could have counted. For example photographers get thousands of views that Google earns from but only pay a reward worth nothing usually. Even 1 cent per view will cover costs.
4:43 Who could buy Chrome ? Let me guess, a trillionaire close to Trump, appeared with him in his rallies, who is already a contractor and will have a position in his administration ?
Yup thought the same 😂 his wet dream
People CHOOSE to use chrome and google search because, yes, it is better. With THAT being said, the US government should crack down on the data collection and exploitation instead.
Why? I may not like Google but when did it become a crime to create what people need?
When you don't allow others to also provide what people need, potentially in an even better way.
When a company becomes too big, it's the responsibility of the government to break it up. Otherwise the company becomes too powerful and monopolizes the market which then leads to abuse of power. Google was supposed to have been broken up a long time ago, the only reason it made it this far is corruption.
when they become the sole source. its your money and data 🤷🏼
exactly, they should focus on reduce censorship done by G.
About effen time. This monopoly should have been broken up over 10 years ago. The normal people lose when there are monopolies, and people benefit when companies have multiple competitors.
They should try to cut monopoly of USD (printing money and causing pain for all other major economies even if it’s not their fault)
the USD is the international currency because of its strong anti-corruption practices, making it a reliable currency. You are welcome to use whatever else you like, the US doesn't require anyone to use USD, its just probably going to be more volatile and US companies probably won't bother working with it - but you don't have to work with them if you don't want to.
🤡
Recent strikes in the film and movie industry by actors, content producers not earning from.digital media companies should guide and inform Google and other large tech giants on allowing revenue models for content suppliers or related.
The market domination is customer driven. Hence supply & demand, its a basic economic principle but it seems the DOJ can't understand that. I guess people who focus on punishing, can't grasp the concept of basic business practise, they probably shouldn't stick their nose into area's that don't apply to them.
I can't be illegal to supply people with a well known search engine.
@@charzemc Exactly what I think. This whole thing doesn't make sense at all.
They are too big and monopolizing the market, and that is not democratic. There must be healthy competitions for the benefit of the consumers.
Goggle should be made to divest RUclips as well!
You don't see the irony in your comment?
theres plenty of competition for that atm
It's too late, no matter what they do to Google, we will follow it even unto the ends of the earth. Google or nothing!
That's just sheep behavior.
I love this woman
If Google paid some ofs its content suppliers it could have counted. For example photographers get thousands of views that Google earns from but only pay a reward worth nothing usually. Even 1 cent per view will cover costs.
Bing it sounds like ping it
Elon Musk somewhere in this...
Your realm will now experience polaris' s environmental telepathy...follow the royal frech bloodlines
Firefox since 2013 for me
nope. cant believe they dropoed widgets. remove it all and the customisation option...need those back
Don't worry Google. 👍
The DoJ is increasingly becoming a cartoon character, much like Dee dee from the Dexter's laboratory.
I don't use google
Who owns RUclips?