It's very bizarre that Europe has relatively recently lived through the collapse of Yugoslavia, the forced ethnic swaps in Greece and turkey, the separation of checkoslovakia, the forced removal of ethnic Germans from Poland and east Prussia, the ethnic partitioning of Austria Hungary and most of these happened between people who look relatively similar with relatively similar histories but different cultures. Now I'm supposed to believe that sub Saharan African people and Arabs, who for the most part seem to actually despise European culture, are going to make European culture better?
Yeah okay man. Yugoslavia is a horrible example. Yugoslavia broke up because of many reasons. But not because of "different culture". It broke up because people in Yugoslavia thought they are different which we aren't. And culture is a horrible example. Serbs in banja luka have a different culture then from serbs who live in Eastern herzegovina. But both are serbs. So yeah...
@@tomgu2285you're not making the point you think you are. Correct, even people with similar appearance and culture will not integrate if they see each other as different, even if they are not. Best to not force cultures to clash.
@@tomgu2285you’re correct, i want to add on to what you said, i think the different cultures hate in the balkans are more of a symptom of a collapsed, once great multi ethnic nations/country, xenophobia is the only way for banana republic microstates in the balkans to cope with the fact that they caused the breakup and don’t want to admit they’re not different They are brothers not enemies but too much resentment for losing something great caused them to think otherwise
The fact that Danmark managed to implement such rules without receiving a major backlash is astonishing to me. I bet that if any Eastern European nation would try to copy those policies they'd be called out for being racist and backward.
@@anon2034 I don't know, probably lots of people, usually people like to be perceived in a positive light. Me personally? Yeah...IDGAF. Still, I find those double standards kind of hilarious.
Denmark have small land area. It's barely possible to cram anymore over 10 million people without having to build large apartment blocks everywhere. Netherlands, Belgium and Britain are in serious trouble
Didn't you guys know? If you are having any issues in a society, letting tens of thousands of young African men loose with no jobs who don't speak your language is going to fix all of the issues
@@gggghhhh1288that's not exactly the case, the french have a system similar to the american one where it doesn't matter if you are a full blooded French or hail from somewhere else, the french state and system consider you french regardless of if you do have ancestoral ties to the motherland or not
@@gggghhhh1288 And they crippled many of the nations the people are coming from. An immigration system can work when: A) its not in too high numbers B) the people are not ravaged by war France broke both these rules, they enmasse imported people from regions they themselves devastated like libya. Places like niger were robbed blind and had puppet leaders installed, making places unstable leads to mass illegal immigration and causes people to not be a civil as you would like. An immigrant from saudi arabia will be much better behaved than an immigrant from another arab country that was invaded for various reasons such as war causing ptsd and weakening morals. France killed themselves and the nations the immigrants came from, its sad because they all could have succeeded but they didn't want that. Its like how the usa is fine with most immigrants because they are in low numbers and are typically well off enough to make it to the usa, but have a problem with latino immigrants because the nations below the usa were destabilized. Now the people are coming enmasse and the they are ravaged by problems totally avoidable if the cia didn't go crazy with funding cartels and doing coups.
@@pablolostum insane amounts of very poor immigrants straight up grabbing you on the street, trash everywhere, people peeing on walls in broad daylight. The native Belgians are also quite hostile and rude (no wonder).
Brussels is dull and boring. But the worst city I visited is Charleroi, about an hour from Brussels. Worse than the worst looking and most drap cities I have visited in Eastern Europe.
We just had elections here in FInland and every major political party except one advocated for increasing the amount of "non-EU employment based immigration" to 50k a year. In contrast, less than 45k children were born in Finland in 2022. I don't need a Master's degree in mathematics to know that should their plan succeed Finland would be minority European in my lifetime and minority Finnish in my parents'.
Your government is forced to attract skilled immigrants from other countries because your population is not having enough children and a society with larger old people and less young people cannot sustain. Maybe start having kids instead?
@@chipcook5346 I think both the assessment and description of the US is wrong. Firrslty it's not the only country that successfully assimilated immigrants, you have at least all main anglophone countries plus Argentina and Uruguay, and maybe arguably Brazil, Chile, Cuba and Malaysia (although the first three were way less immigrants in number and the last it's arguable how successfully). Other "success stories" include chinese migration in the Philippines and Thailand, which were so seemlessly assimilated people hardly even know about it. I'm sure if I took a bit longer I could think of other examples (19th century France and Switzerland received a lot of immigrants, etc). Anyway, I also disagree with the prospect that was mentioned that current assimilation in the US is less than in the past. Linguistic assimilation is visibly happening, and that is still following the three generation form that the italians and germans did in the past. Most contemporary immigrants in the US (central american and mexican) indeed have more in common with the subtract population of the parts of the US they go too than most great wave immigrants ever did. So there's that. Finally I think you forgot the role of distance. The US is shielded by nature and this it receives people who elect to go there historically, even their refugees have more or an immigrant mentality. That's not necessarily the case for Europe, where people can arrive more easily. There are also cultural traits and even political ideas that impact assimilation positively or negatively. I think the picture is more complex than just a land grab, as for example land wasn't offered to immigrants in Argentina and there assimilation was basically total and if anything larger in the cities.
Most Muslims believe that Islam is their Nation and they don't respect National culture traditions or Philosophy of any other country. Modern Citizen is created by modern education and culture. And respect that completely.
In Islam you have to live by the rule of the land But I don't get you guys, at least properly understand what you are hating on at least get your facts right.
I agree that it is very hard (probably impossible) to really melt into the north-western society. I can tell as a Pole living several years in Norway (I suppose other Nordic countries are similar). I was working in the hospital, almost exclusively with native Norwegians and despite speaking quite fluently Norwegian, I wasn't able to start any friendship there. It is true that I was treated fair, everyone was smiling a lot and there was plenty of "hyggelig", politically correct small talk. That's it. Any kind of relationship after work. It was dificult to thrive this way so I started to look for friends outside the workplace. I've found SAPS (Stavanger Active People Society) consisted exclusively of immigrants from all over the world (majority of them from Eastern Europe). What else was striking, there were no muslims in SASP. They've just sticked together with other muslims only. In other words - there were three, completely different communities there - Norwegians, non muslim imigrants and muslim imigrants.
This is a demografic timebomb. Solidarity on Wich our walfare state is based has diappeared. More and more Europeen places become third world dump holes. Poor, violent and fragmented. Westerners are too decadent, blasé, weak, inert to tackle the problem. Laws to weak and ineffective. Schoollevels in Europe go down. International tests show. (pisa-tests) As long they can go on Holliday, being "themselves" in all kind of social political niches and lifestyles, it is oké. It is the end of a civilisation and Will not turn for the better. The politics don't see. Right needs cheap labour and consuments Left needs poor dissatisfied victimised voters who feel discriminated..
As a Dutch person occasionally working in emigration services, aswell as my mother who helps at emigration centers- we strongly disagree. Poles integrate quickly and easilly into the Netherlands. Very few Poles are recogniseable as Poles after living here for 10 years or so.
It’s a real drama, here in Barcelona we were proud of our low crime and our traditions, now I can’t sleep with windows open because Georgians are cleaning many houses around every day, we can’t wear any thing of value going out because a moroccan can harm us to take it out, my daughter is scare of migrant rapist looking for a prey, my wife is harass at night by Pakistani taxi drivers , when I go to the center city I’m the only one that can say that their grand parents where born there. For me is really sad what we have done.
It’s probably the fault of the system for not punishing criminals the right way. Still, Barcelona’s crime rate is very low, so those things you mention happen very rarely
@@youtubeisdeletingmycomment3235 I precisely trust more the statistics because word of mouth can be easily manipulated in favour of the political discourse.
@@youtubeisdeletingmycomment3235 That would be an egregious act of irrationality. The facts say crime rates are low. Not that they do not happen. So why are taking his statement as if it is evidence of something greater other than it is as expected of the facts?
I am from Spain and this is terrifying, here in Barcelona the situation is out of control, in 5 years things have changed a lot and very quickly. I'm afraid of the future
I'm French and I fear the same thing. I'm in a small city, but they are very "welcoming". As a women, I'm incresingly anxious about going outside: there is bands of people starting fights, attacking cars at night, and even in the day there is drug deals in the historic neighborhoods. The police is powerless (or it's deliberate ?), and I don't feel safe if there is ever a problem happening. I can't even speak out my fears, because "I'm a monster" for wanting to feel safe.
@@mandolorian9893 I'm not responsible for what happened before I was born. And it's not about "repayment" for our ""sins"", we are repaying the babyboom. The immigration wave that went in France to repopulate is already setteled. Now all of Africa's young men are coming, but it's only because Europe makes everything they can to prevent them for developping their economy, so they can have more immigration to compensate the low births. But it's not working they way they thought it would. There is nothing for them in europe, since factories were sent to China a long time ago. There is not enough work for the locals in the first place. Also, France was good for Africa at the time of colonisation, and a lot of african people still love France very much. So I don't know where your point is, but if you are confused between Belgium and France because we speak the same language, that's a you problem.
@@mandolorian9893 These are normal people who had no say in what their government did in the past. Don't be a hypocrite. If your world was being turned upside down you would also cry in pain as your culture does nothing to stop the situation. The French government cares not for its own people. Your average native Frenchman does not deserve this. You are the only hateful one in this argument. I wouldn't wish cultural and demographic downfall on ANYONE. You seem to hate all French people and believe they are all guilty for something that only the rich elites in their government could want and benefit from the most.
I am a German who's living in Germany and it is really crazy what is going on right now. In Schools and Universities Ethnic Germans are basically a Minority at this point and Islamic people are very often a majority. Honestly i do not have a personall hatred against Muslims, some of my friends are muslimic but it is a really weird situation and i am convinced if this trend keeps progressing we are going to have very similar politics to the Nazis very soon. Edit: Also, what you are saying in the Video about immigrants is kinda correct. There is zero to no problem with European immigrants in Germany. Nobody minds Polish workers or Italians who live here.There is also a difference between mixed marriages and "normal immigrants". People who have (for example) a German father and Turkish Mother are mostly not an issue.Things only get complicated when immigrants insist on being foreign and fundamentally rejecting other cultures.
You won't because you won't have any power. It isn't a 1925. Perhaps they will take over and you'll have a Islamist State, soon, with Germans as second class citizens.
Lol I am AMERICAN-- the real one, brown skin. Not a White illegal British settler. Here, Germans and their progeny are the highest in existence from Europe. It seems like you people like to complain whenever the tables turn. Come and get your people, take them back to Germany ( particularly Trump), then we can talk.
No European was ever asked. Asked for a complete irreversible change to our nations. We never voted for it. We were never told. This has all been done to us without our consent through the backdoor.
Pretty sure anti immigration parties have existed for 50 years now and they never got the most votes. So youre wrong. We could have voted anti immigration but we didnt because of our white guilt and political correctness
Because were also not being genocided or oppressed by the immigrants? (And the terrorism and knife attack stuff is totally overblown when you look at statistics)
@@spaceowl5957 How many people are beaten, raped, robbed, groomed, murdered, sex trafficked, overdosed, subsidized while the government calls you a racist? And in the American case, affirmative action, minority status and federally protected while all this is going on! 🤬 Why? So the donors, the globalists and the elite can sell more toilet paper for the luv of money 🤬 You want to play war with Russia and the Chinese and all their satellite countries. Let me remind you the grand game is just beginning and the Russians and Chinese are masters at backing an insurgency. It’s the same leftist rhetoric that overthrew western civilizations in Africa and Asia. Our governments are fighting proxy wars with their citizens and don’t even know it. I don’t think you get it. But the time will come when you do!
Western Europe spends so much on pensions & healthcare for its old people while denying life for those who would have been the children of the current young generation. And while brining in immigrants to live those lives in Europe instead. Its a terrible way for its old people to treat its young people.
As a Polish - American living now in The Netherlands I must say that your analysis is really spot on both sides of the Atlantic. I am impressed by the depth of your research and supporting materials. Great work and best of luck.
@@Locutusoftheblackpillum Dosłownie dobrze, że Ukranińcy przyjechali, bo brakowało rąk do pracy i mamy okropnie słabą demografię. Pamiętaj każdy Ukrainiec to jeden ciapaty mohmed mniej. Pojedź na zachód, zobacz jak tam jest "super" z murzynami i ciapatymi i innymi ninja. 95% Ukraińców zachowuje się wzorowo i szybko się asymiluje, tacy imigranci to skarb.
@@nicola7735 Because the UAE has a very strong Islamic identity that doesn't tolerate discidents. If Europe treated migrants like the UAE does, there would be no problem.
@@nicola7735 Because they are fundamental islamic nation,and the majority of population is literally a modern slave caste. Only majority european countries are targeted,not just ex-colonialist. Sweden,Ireland,Poland are getting/going to get the same treatment,and they never were colonial super-powers. Whether you're an actual european or not,know, there will be no Shire.
Illegal immigration is a minor issue in Europe. Mass immigration is mostly composed of legal immigrants. The governments are the ones to blame, not the migrants (or their descendants) who came legally to Europe
@@GrosPointRouge Actually... My comment at least informs you that you managed to summarise this view. Without it copying the video nor trying to create some sort of moral point which was talked about anyway. The topic even being concentrated around the problems of Mass Migration rather than pure migration as it talks about rate of migration and rate of assimilation, with an underlying contextual differences affecting these rates. The legalism or illegalism of migration becomes increasingly null with the rate being so high... As measures are need to limit even legal migration (thus by default affecting illegal migration).
History gives us several examples where this could go that I think are quite realistic: 1. Lebanon. Looses any cohesion and becomes de facto devided into ethno-religious enclaves periodically fighting each other. 2. South Africa. Contrary to Lebanon the country is still in one piece (SO FAR) but society becomes split up into heavenly segregated communities (that's likely the pre stage to the Lebanon scenario, SA is less and less of a functional country every day and various armed groups, like security forces number more than police and military combined, which is a huge red flag) 2. The ethno cultural majority consolidates around some shared idea (likely stuff like being white or being Muslim ect.) and forces other groups to conversion or exiles them. I think that, for western and central Europe, the last two are most likely over the long run. At some point the wealth of nations like Germany ect will nose dive significantly (since they are doing very little to maintain it, just look up for german politics to understand that.), which will inevitably destroy the apathetic culture towards these problems. I think that nations such as Spain, Italy, France (still has a quite nationalistic culture) are likely to go the third way, meanwhile I see countries like Sweden or England (likely without Scotland and Northern Ireland at this point.) could well go the south african scenario. I predict a future, where large parts of southern/Latin Europe as well as post communist central/eastern Europe consolidate around some kind of new ideology, which will likely lead to migration of more native Europeans there, effectively making these the new centers of the region, meanwhile I think that germanic countries will decline greatly (Germany, Sweden, England). As for who will actually win if both sides (natives and migrants) will go even remotely all in, it's clearly the natives: they have the countryside, control over the infrastructure, like electricity, water and food supply, as well as as making up most of the police and, especially, the military. A fight of the immigrants VS. natives and respective loyalists for let's say France would look like this: radicalized immigrant youths get besieged in Paris and Marseille ghettos (by land area they are not that large compared to the rest of these cities), till they surrender or these areas get stormed, ending in a bloodbath. In return terrorist organizations might organize bombings or something (not enough to win a war)... Also keep in mind that countries like Italy or Greece are only that dysfunctional, because EU northern European subsidies are allowing their political class to behave that way. If German money dries up they will likely go into nationalist dictatorships, shoot boats in the water, get energy supplies via war ect. (Greece, for example, has a bad financial policy but a military more prepared to fight (and a population to support it) than Germany, which, in times of trouble, is far more important).
Not even entering in that bit of doom scenario, just want to point out the role of Syria and Israel in the breakdown of Lebanon. It isn't like Lebanon just collapsed by itself internally, it was a mix of Israel and Syrian meddling and weaponizing of minority groups mixed of course with sectarization.
@@marysia5365 Yust like east asia, by facing it face on. I think that every country will develop differently, but here are some guesses: low birthrate mean an end of economic growth, future generation will likely get used to it. Some will profit from it. Places like Poland or Czechia, for example will absorb most of the available people from eastern Europe (maybe with some immigration from Latin America), but countries in the slavic-orthodox east and the balcans will, for the most part, have no such options, as they are way to unappealing. Populations will collapse, the economy in the cities will decline, reruralization will take place, new ideologies will take hold, likely based upon the importance of children and small town community, some countries might desintegrate entirely, Russia most likely. Im almost sure, that, over the next 50 years or so, places like Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Bulgaria ect will see their populations collapse several fold (this is a exponential process, most projections don't count in, that, if you have two pensioneers for every one in their 20s, these young people will flee in unheard of masses). These will be the "fuel" for the new core nations for the forseeable future. Also, many of these countries will fall to pro natalist right wing dictatorships, likely running on an ageist young vs old campaign. Much of the current value system will die, replaced by new belive structures (likely, at first, a white homeland, nativist, secular nationalist form of right wing ideology). I thing chances are high that most of the orthodox world will desintegrate and, through a painful process, slowly become a fronteer region, being assimilated into whatever the rest of Europe turns into. Orthodox culture will slowly die. I, honestly, think that the future of Europe is fundamentally non Christian, becoming, together with East Asia, a lab for totally new ideologies, but that's another topic.
@@user-uf2df6zf5w Im from Poland and imo those immigrants from Eastern Europe and Latin America are just a temporary solution, they can't supply us forever. In long term we must improve our native birth rate but the reason it's so low now is in my opinion rather cultural than economic. It just become an expected norm to stay childless in your 20s and have fun even if you can already afford having children and then maybe start family in your 30s when most woman aren't fertile enough to have more than 1-2 children at that age. If you do otherwise you are seen as strange or stupid. I have no idea how to change that. You probably can't just force people to breed more earlier, unless you have some totalitarian power to ban condoms or something. But Poland is still objectively far from becoming totalitarian.
@@chinesetaxevader I moved from Copenhagen to my native island of Bornholm, because I couldn't stand all the headscarves and Arabic-speaking immigrants on the streets. I felt like a stranger. But now 19 years later, I see the same thing slowly happening here.
There is a certain type of middle class (especially upper middles class) person that actively encourages this. My sister fits into this category and when we discuss this and I say for example that the UK had more than 650k net immigration, she first said where did the numbers come from then said you need immigration this fill labour shortages. When I said this was adding to the housing crisis she said that the real problem is the government isn't building enough houses. I pointed out that it is not reasonable to expect a country the size of the UK to cover such a huge increase in the population. Then she just said the government can't do anything. She is from the UK but lives in Luxembourg (away from the end point problems of the kind of immigration policy she supports).
It's like a mental virus that is spreading without control. That's on the part of the general population, the politicians know full well what they're doing.
Everyone is equal based on their intrinsic human worth. But not everyone is compatible culturally and no one has the right to replace other ethnicities with their own based on the notion that we're all equally valuable.
when it comes to "partial migrant backround" you should not forget that many decendents of ethnic groups do not count anymore as "migrant backround" in the statistics, because they are from 2nd or 3rd generation and born in the country.
@@FOLIPE oh its incredibly old, its rather a matter of scale. Its always happened, But with modern transportation, it is far easier for large migrations to take place in a much shorter period of time. After all, societies throughout history have been more migratory than long-term sedentary, even though limited sedentary lifestyles existed with semi-nomadic groups even prior to agriculture, mass sedentary lifestyle is relatively new in human history.
@@Reivehn Let me clarify what I mean then, large scale migration is a relatively recent phenomenon in europe, so it's not like there's a lot of second and third generation immigrants around with the exception of France, UK and Switzerland, plus war refugees from WW2. Also, of course "people have always moved". People have also long been "using steam" to cook, but the industrial revolution is something recent (200ish years) and not ancient. Similarly with immigration. It being a matter of scale makes it a different phenomenon
@@FOLIPE It might be, I somehow have 1.1% Arab DNA (from those DNA tests), and I only have a record of north European ancestors (British, Scandinavian).
@@kel8026 These DNA tests are not metrics of ancestry or family origin, they are like metrics of what your dna looks like compared to sample populations. As they increase their samples the precision improves, but there's no connection necessarily to specific lands, it's always similarity to people groups. People groups always have some level of contact. I don't know where you are from but conections between north africa and Europe are known, from the slave trade to merchants and so on. It could just be statistical noise too. But that isn't quite the same process as modern mass migration
Well - yes, but it was not so dark. It brought ome new inventions: printing press, gunpowder, banking, compass, gothic architecture, education system, musical notation, mechanical clock :)
baltic states are in a dire situation , even without migration they are doomed to extinction on their own. as you can see migration is only a symptom of a bigger problem that isnt often being addressed and that problem is also showing up in asian economies as well with the same effects albeit asians are more reluctant to import foreign workers. the system is the problem.
@@verandi3882 No, You are wrong. Just look at data and facts. Baltic countries was first ones, to experience migration and population displacement on large scale in 20 century. We still still are dealing with aftermaths of it. Much still need to be done, but we are rising from ruins and rising fast. Country size doesn't matter in this case.
@@artursbondars7789 Yep, you're right. The native Baltics are going to go extinct because they don't want to have kids. Unfortunate, but is what it is.
@@artursbondars7789 Russians and other Slavs are White and Christian. Plus before that during the Russian Empire most of your cities had a Baltic German majority and big % of Jews and Slavs. You balts were only majorities in the countrysides
@@Sorted_av oh really? No I don't think so. I ain't running anywhere. As I said there's only gonna be more of us and you'll be an old man watching that happen
Great video, an important thing to note is that third generation immigrants are in Sweden, Netherlands and Denmark considered as of "Swedish/Danish/ Dutch-origin" even though they haven't intermarried.
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
Currently reading “The Strange Death of Europe.” By Douglas Murray, fascinating stuff. It’s really happening. To quote Murray, “So they say, if it doesn’t benefit the culture, it’ll benefit the economy. If it doesn’t benefit the economy, it’ll benefit the culture.”
My only beef with the book is he shy's away from the root causes to "stay in the correct lane". You can prove there is a migration crisis, you can prove there are low birth rates, you can prove these birth rates are economically/socially linked. They talk about exhaustion, about a loss in traditionalism, and religious beliefs. They dance around the issue and NEVER dare speak out about the cause. It isn't some shadow cabal. It isn't some grand conspiracy. It's the baby boomers and Gen X last hurrah before they clock out. This is what they deem just and good. This is doctrine of self hate they inflicted on their children for decades. They inherited global prosperity from the sacrifices of their forebears, did NOTHING but exploit their gift, and when that ran out they mortgaged their children's futures. A Generation of Sociopaths by Bruce Gibney details this in America. It applies doubly so for EU.
It is very good book, but even better, in my opinion, is the book Reflections on the Revolution In Europe: Immigration, Islam and the West by Christopher Caldwell. I feel like Murrey took a lot of inspiration from that book.
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
Not, it's a sloppily researched book with many obvious mistakes. For example, he constantly equals non white immigration to Muslim immigration. That is just embarrassingly wrong. He insinuates, everyone not native from Europe coming to Europe is a Muslim. That is a lie by omission. He also is guilty of framing, e.g. when he translates the survey question "Gehört der Islam nicht zu Deutschland?" as "Does Islam not belong in Germany"? The actual question means "Does Islam not belong to Germany"?, as in "Should it not play a role in German reality?" and the other means "Does Islam not belong in Germany"?, i.e. "Do you wish Islam would not exist in Germany?" That is an important difference to an important question and just goes to show he is sloppy as he builds his argument of huge popular opposition to Islam around a wrongly translated question. And of course this is no coincidence. It is used to increase the power of his argument which becomes pretty worthless through this obvious and very relevant mistake.
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
Someone work towards building a better future please. Please be against this mass immigration, we need a home for our own people. European nations need to exist as nations, not as a mix of all.
I think the main issue here is a shift from authenticity to image. People proportion of racist/non-racist is as ever, they just don't want to look racist. People know this does not work, they just don't want to admit it. People want to look progressive and intelligent supporting migration because that is what they are told it means to be sophisticated, even if internally they know this never works. You see in films how they try to avoid putting POCs as the evil characters, for example.
It's called bait. The elites are giving these Asians and Africans a false sense of comfort. TBH they also did it to Western Europeans from the 70's-90's..
Yep, nail on the head with this one! Thank god i stopped giving any shits at 14 about what anyone thinks of me. It was so liberating. People need to embrace this outlook much more
I don't even care at this point, I watched 'diversity' turn my quiet hometown to a crime riddled slum. Invasive species aren't just limited to the animal kingdom
How do you imagine that? Will the Swedes suddenly wake up and start resisting or what? Their state will suddenly begin to pursue policies that are in the interests of the indigenous population?
“The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life” - is an interesting book to read with regard to the topic in video. There is a part that shows how people become much more “tribal” when they are subconsciously reminded of death. With current ethnic composition of western Europe in which you can clearly see who is your “tribe”, there is a great danger of all hell breaking loose if bad times arrive. Most probably due to economic reasons at that in which indigenous people start to struggle and “it’s us or them” mentality arises
I'm glad that you really emphasize that American culture is one of the easiest to assimilate into and that it kind of works to its advantage. I'm Japanese-American. Born in Japan, but had an American father. I will never be "Japanese" to most Japanese people, but rarely have I ever been denied my status as "American." I wish more minorities in the USA would wake up and realize this. Japan may be an extreme example, but more cultures are like that than they are like the USA.
And now the 13% are trying to get you removed from the status of minority because asian Americans are "stealing" charter school spots from the ghetto tribe
That is because Japanese thinking in the education system teaches them to exclude all those who are different. Their whole life they are trained to keep the different away in a cult-like manner. Any different is considered 'non-japanese', the ultimate insult. Even Japanese who do not conform are excluded.
America doesn't have a culture. It's just the cultures of White Americans being suppressed by the government in order to make room for replacement populations.
Another factor to consider with mexican migration to the US is that mexicans are being increasingly being classified as "white" because most of them are white(not 100% but mostly) They usually are Christian, and extremely eager to integrate into the american culture. I had a friend whose parents were mexican immigrants, they spoke broken english with an accent meanwhile their daughter spoke english as her first language(she did speak spanish at home) Whatever you want to call it, America has been pretty damn good with integration of these immigrants into american society. Also another point to note is, hispanics are not a radically different culture to american culture while african and middle eastern culture is radically different to that of europe. I can see america remaining stable while europe facing major instability due to their inability to integrate immigrants
The US has also always had hispanic people in it, esspecially ever since the spanish american war. It's not at all a new migrant group. If anything i think that's the biggest factor. Hispanic people have always, to at least some extent, belonged to the US.
I live in Texas, the ones coming across the border are not White at all, and many of them aren't even Mexican. Simply being christian doesn't make it easier for you to assimilate, they bring their culture and lifestyle with them. They don't adopt any classical American ways of life at all, and in fact they shame you for not being more like them! There is not any integration at all, and you're lying. AMERICA STABLE? You're delusional.
I love your channel because you just show the facts, you do have your own opinions too but you make sure to distinguish them. These videos you make are good conversation starters.
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
@@kaiserbauch9092 Peace be with you in the name of my Lord Jesus Christ. As an african I think Europeans should try to convert the non Christian immigrants to Catholicism like Western Rome did to the German barbarians.
Hi. I live in Sweden. I think few factors drive the current situation in Sweden: - The Social Democratic Party has ruled much of the past decades. Its policies are primarily driven by ideology (in this case, solidarity). I.e., not a fact-based consequences' analysis - which is per se adorable in urgent crises. With the result of a massive influx from Middle Eastern conflict zones. - Swedish politicians cannot discuss these topics without being accused of being racist, being hammered by the media, and losing popularity votes in the next election, thus avoiding the issue. - The ultra-right-wing nationalistic party (Swedish Democrats) thus gets fuel (now almost the second-largest party) from the people who believe no one listens. They would be utterly unnecessary if politicians had addressed the issues at hand. Cheers.
That is the problem in a nutshell all over Western civilization. People are generally reasonable, but when your ideology means you refuse to deal with a situation or flat out deny there is a problem, the politics force people to to the right, and further to the right as it becomes apparent that is the only way to try and get any political traction against existing left/liberal/progressive policies that are just digging the hole deeper. I am sure a great many people would prefer a centrist/middle of the road solution, but when BOTH sides dig in and refuse to budge, your options are one side or the other. (or the lesser of two evils)
Calling SD ultra right wing nationalistic is hilarious. They are center-right in reality and absolutely nowhere near the far right parties of most european countries.
then get some babies and build a family. We, immigrants, have our plans from the moment we arrive in the country. We need a family, having children, saving money...thats the only way we immigrants can achieve a future. Im sure you enjoy your vacations to Mallorca, Italy or Asia. But that doesn't give you a Future. Get proper and educated women, be a Man, and give her a family...that's the only way
I wonder if western europe will become a compatible source of migrants for eastern europe. I myself migrated to UK from one of the Baltic states, and am now planning to return almost a decade later. The demographic profile of UK isn't the only reason for my decision, nor the main one, but it certainly added to it.
Why should a host country become compatible for migrants. It is the migrants who should adopt. Eastern Europeans also demonstrate the same kind of mentality as other non-European migrants. Only difference is that Eastern Europeans are Christian and White. Otherwise they are as foreign in western Europe as any other non-European.
I'm sure from an individual point of view the west of europe might send immigrants to the east. But net migration is almost surely going to continue favoring the west for the foreseeable future.
@@maxi979 You don't need to time travel to realise that eastern Europeans have more in common with Turks/Central Asians/Kavkaz people then they have in common with western Europe.
The arrogance and naivete in Western liberal thinking is truly frightening. In East and Central Africa, we were aware of Europeans, Arabs, and Indians through the coastal trade, our leaders fought against arab slave traders and each other but thought Europeans were harmless. When the scramble for Africa started they were so unprepared and it happened so fast that even the mightiest empires fell in short order. Western leaders are exactly like 19th-century African leaders, and like them, they and their people will be subjugated by foreigners. But unlike Africa, the people will also be replaced, and go the way of Ameridians. I hope the Europeans wake up before it's too late.
As a person from Iraq I can tell you that the issue is very much multilayered and nuanced. Socioeconomic situations and the meddling of the west into the middle east and greed for oil along with a backward islamic ideology has been the main cause. You come here you see a very big difference, the people who run things have all the wealth and the majority who would starve for scraps. It is out of financial necessity and prosperity that someone would move to europe. Adding to that, those who are more open minded middle easterns are facing the worst discrimination by the islamic fundamenlists exactly like what a European feels with these backward islamics so If I was a European I wouldn't be so keen into letting these people in.
@@Psalm51-ql2cnnot possible according to islam the marriage laws are very clear only the man can go for a Christian or jew due to the fact that the children are usually following the fathers religion But even for men they cant marry atheist women and the ones from other religions cant be
About the great Germanic invasions late antiquity/early Middle Ages, I’ll focus on my country France, and studies conducted by historians and demographers showed that these newcomers (invaders and settlers) did not change drastically the ethnic composition of modern day France. In fact our demographic structure overall remained roughly the same from antiquity to the XXth century with some regional variations especially in border regions
From what I understand, the Roman conquest involved great depopulation followed by a demographic boom and the emergence of the Gallo-Roman, the Latinized Celts, the Germanic invasions on the other hand changed the profile of the elites, the aristocracy tended to be more ethnically Germanic, The great phenomenon in France was Paris's centralizing efforts to erode regional identities, a more cultural process with a linguistic focus. However, there are some exceptions, in the works of Alexis de Tocqueville, he speaks of how Normandy gave a foreign impression, with the region closer to England and Protestant Germanic Europe in certain socio-cultural aspects and political culture; I also saw certain reports from the occupying German forces during ww2 reporting this fact. Was the presence of Norse Scandinavian settlers more than a millennium ago echoing for centuries?
Because those peoples shared a common ancestor from maybe 500 years ago max. We are now interbreeding with peoples with a common ancestor from 200000-50000 years ago
I read something very disturbing but interesting. France had high levels of immigration since the late 19th century,much sooner than other European countries. And dont forget France had low birth rates much sooner than other countries. Ethnic French people likely make up only half of the population if not less. The other half being mostly Southern European and North African in origin.
There signifcantly more migrants in france today than in early medieval era with the migration of franks and others, also, the fertility rates of migrants in france is way bigger than the below replacement natives fertility, doesnt need a rocket scientist to understand the things are way different now.
Its not racist to love your country and culture and not want to see it destroyed. Anyone who says otherwise is the true racist because they only wish the death of your culture and want you to be more like them. Europe is one of the least racist parts of the world but we also have an identity too. If you live in a foreign country your culture should not take priority over your host countries. How is even saying that in anyway controversial we shouldn't have to change who we are to accommodate people who wont even change to accommodate us. Likewise I wouldn't go to china and expect them to become more european, same japan or uganda or any other country.
I mean your nations did for around 600 years, Karma is finaly catching up to your nations, and I am happpy. You know in London, in my Local area, I see more Non Brits then British natives, and I am happy with that, I wish for a Islamic Europe (Slowly becoming a reality) So I am happy, but good thing is that, in general Most Europeans today are all talk,
@@itsve8632 You talk of Karma but I would be curious to know what country you trace your origins to and if they have a history of conquest and genocide. If so then talking of Karma is pure hypocrisy. Islamic nations and empires have done things that you condemn the west for and then some.
@@DrEzekielthing is, I dont beleive in Karma, I simply said it as a bit of a joke, but its still true, Even the worst of the worst Islamic nations have done, Britian has done Worse at a FAR larger scale, then any Islamic nation.
@@itsve8632 Many Islamic conquerors have brutalised the conquered way worse the the British ever did. Arab slavers castrated black slaves and slavery still goes on to this day. To say Britain was worse is just a bare faced lie. You clearly have an anti British/pro Islam bias which means that something minor the British did wrong is worse than something major an Islamic regime does wrong.
@@DrEzekiel Nope, As I said Britian did it as a FAR LARGER scale. And you don't think they castrated slaves? I can see you lie and have a anti Islamic bias, The brits did more worse and generally more people, its clear you try to minimise the British guilt. 90% of problems in the Arab world are British and colonial made. If the brits stuck by their word and gave all of arabia to hejaz and the Arabs. There would be peace.
35:00 minutes of the video: I live in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. The population of the city is 47% European descent but many of the people of European descent are new emigrants and still carry on with their language and culture in everyday life. On my daily walks downtown you hear people talking dozens of foreign languages and I even hear French more than English some days. While I was a student and still today, each ethnic group sit together in the classroom and at the lunch tables regardless if they have an English name or not. I'm not saying there isn't integration of people having coffee etc but in general people hangout with their own ethnic descent even 2nd and 3rd generations. Every part of Greater Vancouver has ethnic enclaves. As far as white flight there are many different reasons. My grandparents retired and moved out of the city for a more rural lifestyle and to supplement their retirement with cheaper real estate. Not long after we wanted to be close to them so we moved too. I feel white people are being blamed for everything as now with young professionals moving back into the inner-city we're being blamed for gentrification. White people seem to be damned if they do and damned if they don't. Indian's vote nearly 100% for an Indian politician not for their policies but because he/she is also Indian. Unfortuniatly, as politics in India they have been corrupt.
if your description of indians being tribal and voting their person happens in every other group and also stays in next 20-30 years(in US it doesnt seem to be that straightforward), canada is in trouble like sudan,ethiopia and many others. In ethiopia problem was described to be exactly this, people fear their rights are pushed down when other group is in power and other group can stay in power exactly coz population is bigger and thus guarantees votes with tribal voting "system".
Do you know the phrase Divide And Conquer? It's sometimes also translated Divide And Rule. It comes from Latin, _Divíde et impera._ Now perhaps you understand better why the elites love immigration. It's not _just_ about economics, though that's a large part of it. Especially for politicians, it's also about how to better marginalize certain demographics so they become easier to rule.
Btw. this is the same tactic the House of Habsburg used in Hungary when they gained control of the country. The first thing they did, was to try to marginalize the ruling Magyar population of Hungary (meaning the natives of Hungary). They did this by opening up for unchecked immigration by Slavic peoples into Hungary. Thankfully, it didn't work out entirely as they planned, however, because the Magyars got along just fine with the Slavs.
@@urlauburlaub2222 Why are you trying to redefine the meaning of Divide and Conquer? Magyarization was in the 1800's. Meanwhile House Habsburg gained control as early as the 1400's. As you well know, Divide and Conquer is a general term for sowing discord to gain power. _One_ of the ways of doing that, is the technique of inviting a third party for dinner, such as when the Habsburgs invited competing ethnicities into Hungary in order to marginalize the Magyar nobility. Either way, it's just an example; a parable to make you learn and see patterns where you didn't before, so you can use it to better understand the current situation. What I'm trying to explain here, is that this way of Divide and Conquer isn't new. In fact, we're seeing it right now, and _that's_ the reason for why we have mass unwanted immigration into formerly ethnically homogenic nations in Europe. The political reason for doing it, is in order to marginalize the current native populations and nations. The reason is obviously outside pressure from institutions like the EU and UN. Meanwhile the economic reason is also obvious: Because it puts pressure on the labour market to ensure lower wages, while at the same time putting pressure on the real estate market to ensure higher housing prices for the owners. Cui bono: Each time there is one special demography that seems to benefit: The top elite, because they can sell or rent out their houses for _higher prices,_ and because they can get work done in their factories or service ships for _lower prices._
The "white flight" in my country has become impossible. As muslims are now in every little village or town, no matter where you go. And the growth rate on average is a doubling every 7 years.
@@greenearth9945 The Natives who were constantly genociding each other in never-ending turf wars? Just think of the Europeans as another tribe across a giant lake that won against all the other tribes and created peace. We're all the same, after all.
You know look up Enoch Powell’s speeches on immigration 60-80s, this video is like a sociological-historical extension of almost everything he said except for still a prediction of big internal conflicts and violence.
There have been no "rivers of blood" though. Powell should have just said that there will be parallel societies according to phenotype or ethnicity in the future.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 very true, he was broadly basing the prediction on the Indian-Pakistani conflicts post independence. However, it is still unclear whether it’s modern values or far greater food security and development overall which achieves greater peace despite high immigration. Perhaps both are related
@@batmanbad5091 well yes but, in this logic England in the 1600s (which was 100% monoethnic)was more brutal than it is now, so, what is really the point? Are the violent events that you have in mind the product of conflict because of biological phenotype? Or are they because of other motives, such as religious extremism?
The thing is that even if Sweden becomes 25% Swedish Swedes will still be the upper class but the lower class will be totally different how does that play out
36:36 The most common foreign nationalities in prison statistic should be distinguished from ethnicity. A majority of Bulgarians or Romanians in western prisons are in fact Gypsies with Bulgarian or Romanian passports.
how is genocide if no one is being killed? it's a demographic shift that can be stopped if Europeans actually started having babies, but they won't because they don't want to afford it
I'm a third generation muslim immigrant in France who has also worked a bit as an engineer in the US, Ireland and Switzerland, and your analysis is honestly spot on. Save for a fact that I personally think is worth mentioning: Muslim immigrants will justify a lot of their personal or cultural beliefs with religion, but more often than not, there is nothing in the religion that actually backs up what they think. As a muslim you are actually encouraged to either abide by the rule of the king of the country you live in (that you obviously interpret as the democratically elected government nowadays) or leave, yet Muslims in Europe will find all kinds of loopholes in the religion to justify their behavior. You are obligated to keep good relationship with your neighbors and NURTURE that relationship (i.e. interact with them in a positive manner and frequently enough) yet Muslims in Europe are completely shut off from the rest of the community and usually just develop their own micro-biome that eventually become ghettos in big city suburbs, and, as the Quran verse says very clearly, you should not enforce your religion upon others, yet look at terrorism. The reality here is that most of the issues come from the fact that they come from countries that are completely backwards ideologically and have failed to keep up with the advancements of the rest of the world, their societies are hyper patriarchal and authoritarian, in which women have been trained to be submissive and to be proud of it, and men can do whatever the hell they want, which more often than not transgresses the religious principles they claim to abide by. I personally deplore the state of my diaspora, there are many of us who try to make things better, but recently the majority started migrating to Asian and American countries, me included, because the quality of Muslim communities there is just incomparable to our disastrous situation here. I can very much feel that I will soon be unwanted by the country I was born in, and I do not feel any remnant of connexion with the muslim diaspora anymore, I gave up completely. Ever since I worked in the US, I got to meet Muslims there, and many of them share a similar background as me. Muslims In America are high achiever, have high income families and are more educated than the average American, I don't see why I would want to go back to Europe. This continent will implode by the next century.
I wondered where the negative stereotypes about Muslims in Europe came from. I don't live in Europe and have never been there so I don't want to dismiss their issues. I am an American and all the Muslims I know over here are good people who work hard, sure there are some cultural differences but they seem sensible once they are explained.
@@Awethon I looked at some of the European news and there is a big difference between the Muslims I have met in the US compared to the European ones. The ones here tend to be married and have a family instead of being single military age men.
@@alastairthegreat2887because unlike Europe Muslim immigration to America is controlled and legal because there is no borders between Muslim world and America which makes integration much easier
I have noticed that the USA never had this extreme problem with tensions between religions like Europe has. In the USA there is about 45 million Catholics, 7.5 million Jewish people, 3.4 million Muslims, 65 million non-religious and the rest is other or Protestant. So we are a very religiously diverse country already, over 120 million Americans are not Protestant.
@@PeruvianPotato not to any of the extremes that Europe had tho is my point. The USA is the most religiously diverse country in the world, only 33% of Americans identified as Protestant as of 2024. Another 24% of Americans identified as Catholic, 22% as irreligious/Agnostic/Atheist, 4% Jewish, 2% Muslim, 1% Buddhist and 1% Hindu etc.
This video is doing great so far. Thank you all for watching and for your kind words of praise! I will try to work on the pronunciation and intonation! But I need to address certain issues appearing in the comment section since some of the comments are really unhinged. I won't delete any comments, but I want to clarify that I denounce and disagree with the following: Giving too much weight to research regarding IQ and race since it leads to very ugly rabbit holes and is just an evil way to evaluate people. If IQ is so important, why wouldn't you measure the IQ of the population of your country and expel the low-IQ people? Anti-semitism and the notion that the "Jews" are behind everything. Even if I ignore that it is foolish to think that they would wield the power to influence world affairs in such a matter, why would they do it? How does, for example, the state of Israel benefit from the pro-Palestine stance of Europe? How is it in the interest of Jews to increase anti-semitism in France so that the Jews emigrate to Israel? Jews are not a monolith. Sure, some Jewish people promote globalist secularist liberal values, but there also are conservative nationalist Jews and everything in between. Obviously, and I am somewhat surprised I even have to write it, any manifestations of neonazism. If Hitler had won, as some people in the comments suggest, my people and many other Central and Eastern European peoples I hold dear would not be here. Eastern European Neonazi is an oxymoron; I am an Untermensch according to Nazis. Any calls to violence. As for the Great Replacement Theory, I already spoke about it in the video about the Great Demographic Implosion (part II). While it is just a mathematical fact that in certain countries, for example Germany, every year the number of people that dies, mostly ethnic natives, are balanced off by immigrants so the population and the workforce do not decline, I sincerely do believe that it is not some grand conspiracy by the elites or "the Jews" or whatever. It is a combination of, in my opinion, not well-thought-out policies, conformism, and lack of political courage. But the world is not a place that can be governed in the way people believe conspiracy theories think it can be managed. It is mostly chaos, an intersection of hundreds of interests, events, and incidents. Assuming that it is all run by some nefarious elites in the background gives us a certain sense of peace by believing that it is all governed by someone. It is not. The truly scary reality is that nobody runs anything; it is a train without an engine driver.
I think IQ is very interesting. First of all, it would mean East Asian and Jewish peoples would take over the earth. And then everybody else would be expelled from their countries xD
To address your question: "How is it in the interest of Jews to increase anti-semitism in France so that the Jews emigrate to Israel?" While it isn't the case for all Jews, a minority of them, such as Ingrid Lomfors and Barbara Spectre - both from the same parish, btw - are in agreement that making Europe a worse place for Jews is fulfilling the prophecies of the Torah, whereupon all Jews will return home to the Promised Land. This is ofc cringe religious superstition, but now you know why this minority of Jews work for a Europe that is actually worse for European Jews. Not all Jews like this idea, however, and many want to be able to live on in Europe without risking life and limb on every corner store. Just as an example, my friend wore a shirt with a band logo reminiscent of the Star of David to the local store in Oslo. Then some obviously Middle Eastern guy just calmly said to him, "I hate Jews!" Baffled we asked him why, and then my friend got into an argument with him - which we quickly ended, because more people were massing in. It simply wasn't safe having that sort of conversation, in our own native country.
You already pointed out why the lower class feels replaced in your video. And that what drives this replacement is a systemetical political disfranchisement of this class through political means like cordon sanitaire's around "populistic parties". And that this replacement is driven by an leftist educated academic elite who do not bare the burdens in their rich homogeneous neighborhoods is something you also mentioned. By the way dutch statistics are skewed since 3rd generation non western immigrants( who feel more alienated then the generations before) are counted as native dutch.
The idea that you can force peoples of different races and ethnicities to form a nation state goes against the most fundamental characteristics of the human species, it is literally the reason why nation states formed in the first place. One‘s race and ethnicity are integral parts of one‘s identity and cannot be removed or adjusted through 'integration'. And humans prefer to live with, be surrounded by and interact with other humans of the same race, people that look like them. This is well understood. Much in the way Eagles don‘t hang out with pigeons or other birds. All this is rooted in Marxist ideology where one can simply erase human biology, completely disregard human nature and simply mold, reconfigure and reshape human beings to one‘s liking. The whole thing spells disaster and that‘s exactly what we‘re seeing happen in France and other places today. It will eventually results in a reversion to a time on Earth when there were hundreds and thousands of microstates, tribes and clans etc; definitely not the neo-Marxist 'workers of the world, unite' (which they did not) vision of a 'global community' composed of 'global citizens' or whatever. Europe must remain Europe.
Your post stands head and shoulders over the vast majority of these posts due to its coherence, logic, and common sense. This drive to create countries with wide disparities between races, cultures and religions, is an artifice of the highest order. They are trying to achieve harmonious societies with individuals, families, and the larger public, who do not only not resemble each other, but do not share the same beliefs, culture, or values. All held together by the thin mesh of of democratic governance. The West is destroying ethnicities and cultures by emphasizing diversity and inclusion, and open borders. They are hell bent on eradicating the indigenous people of Europe and European descent. This is being aided by the fact that Europeans and those of European descent, are either having fewer children, or no children at all. In short, whites are contracepting themselves out if existence. Hence the looming shadow of replacement. I agree, that Europe must remain Europe. No one is asking, nor suggesting to China, that it should import mass numbers of people who are not Han Chinese, so the country can be more, "diverse."
the problem with your analogy is that Eagles and Pigeons are different species. Africans, Europeans and Asians are of the same species we just look different because we adapt to different climates biologically. a pigeon and an eagle can not procreate, but an Asian (human) and Latino (human) can.
Your comment made me think. Tbf, if microstates were the result of forced mass immigration, wouldn't that be exactly the result desired as a globalist or some form of power state? You can easily dominate/conquer small microstates (tribes). I do feel there has been a strong push lately for some form of United States of Europe from Brussel. In order to accomplish this you must destroy the strong tribal ethicities in European countries. Only then can you promise unification under something "better". In my estimates Mass Immigration is a great way to destroy/destabilize a centralized culture in a country.
The idea that Latino migrants to the U.S. assimilate easily and have no significant longterm negative impact on the U.S. is absurd. I can't imagine you being a resident of the U.S. to say such a thing.
Wow. Very good documentary especially the one about the USA. I’m black American and so many Latinos are coming to my community you have to admire how hard they work. Many have poor English speaking skills, but they hustle to work. I’d be interested in seeing how Europe looks demographic wise in 10 years.
You missed the key aspect. Immigrants to social democratic countries usually are less enterpreneurial and more often don't work and excessively use free services provided by the welfare state. But immigrants to more free market oriented countries usually are more enterprenerial, work and accomodate to local conditions. So it's about different economic model. Economic model of Europe doesn't favor social mobility.
Fucking excellent video! I just want to say THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. It does give me tons of hope to start seeing people analyzing the narrative that we have been fed for years
One thing is often forgotten when talked of europe: lot of wars had aspect of this ethnic,cultural division(be it language, religious differences, cultural differences even smaller ones), thus post WW2 was peaceful due to smart deals to keep this in mind (in africa this is often mentioned as big factor behind wars, but not in europe, which to me shows big hubris and ignorance of our history).
I’m Eastern European immigrant in London and I agree. Although I am the contributor financially I do see massive culture clash and honestly the want to meet more people from my culture. However, many educated and enterprenual Eastern Europeans come here for 10years max and leave back home due to cultural differences. West Europe is temporarily state until we have funds and ideas to make it in our countries.
Yes, that may maybe true for Eastern Europeans. But there is no way that Africans will work for a couple of years in a European country and then choose to voluntarily go back. It would be extremely rare.
@@taireport I think this has to be considered in immigration laws, which made EU good idea as the economies although different people still go back or if don’t the culture clash is less than non-eu countries. Controversial opinion I think we should discriminate based on trends and culture because it definitely will affect the country.
It's funny that the reverse has begun to happen as well. Eastern Europeans move to London for larger salaries to save up and go home. Meanwhile some Westerners like myself who work primarily online move to Eastern Europe for the lower cost of living.
American here. Just want to point out that the crack thing was originally supported by leaders in the black community, as they wanted the issue cracked down on and addressed, not expecting it to be the drawn out slog that it became. It wasn't (entirely) a product of institutional racism, but also of the paternalism of the federal government and the faith placed in it at the time. The effects certainly led to an imbalanced outcome though.
Not exactly. We wanted jobs, rehab, and better policing. The dems heard more policing and stricter laws. Black Americans never get exactly what we ask for from these parties.
That random picture of two middle class intellectuals at 30:18 and the likening of population aging denial to cosmetic surgery at 34:36 are moments I laughed at. Well researched channel, not afraid to tackle sensitive topics and not bigoted or hateful in any way. Rarely see such well balanced videos on these matters.
This is a serious topic that has profound impact to nations. I myself is an immigrant and an ethnic minority in the host country, although I'm not quite settled down yet and may move to another country/back to my home country on any day. I see it quite bizarre how certain European countries resort to mass migration as the single method to resolve their demographic problem without considering potential long-term impacts. What's worse in most platforms this topic is considered racist and therefore banned from public debates. It is not going to end well for either the native Europeans nor the immigrates as in some countries ethnic groups are bound to end up in riots and conflicts in the near future. Europe is already lagging behind North America and East Asia in technology advancement which will cause major economic and social problems, if ethnic clashes become the norm Europe will for sure turn into 3rd world.
By stealing the fruits of their labour through financial and currency con games, central banks have turned the working class into the working poor in many of these European countries. This has resulted in no family formation and no children. Birth rates have thus crashed and the young people see no future. The solution is simple. Get rid of central banking thieves and watch demographics reverse course.
Europe is by no means lagging jn technology. Not sure what technologies you had in mind but Europe generally remains on cutting edge. By Europe I mean Germany. 😂
Germany is not the EU. There are many countries in the EU, and Germany is actually lagging behind in digital advancement since it's always been hyper-focused on heavy industry, so you are not well informed.@@user-rg9xd9mu5r
This was such an insightful video. I am mixed european (dutch) and these issues and topics require so much nuance. When having conversations about this people often reduce the topic to short-sighted and uninformed comments. Big up to Kaiser for explaining not only that these issues with migration exist, but also the how and why. Getting a clear picture as to why these immigrations are happening and why they are failing to integrate on a large population scale is so enlightening. In the Netherlands its hard to have these conversations. Immigrants (or their kids) often feel unwelcome in the countries they live in, mostly due to economic and cultural segregation instigated by their hosts (Kaiser explained this in the video). As someone with a unique perspective into both foreign and native ethnicities I notice that Dutch people can easily figure out migration is a "problem" but find it hard to identify or admit the main causes behind the failed integration, something the natives also have a very big hand in. Netherlands was eager to import these people when they could make money off their backs, but preferably wanted to cast them out after the money was made and the labour was done. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. Even I, as someone who has lived in The Netherlands my whole live, speak the native language and know dutch history thoroughly (No offense, but often in much more detail than my homogenous ethnical dutch countrymen) and I still get strange looks in more rural villages and sometimes still have to deal with racism and fear (probably stemming from that heavy tribal mentality that Kaiser explained) of my skin color from my fellow dutch people. This is not the norm however, and I have these encounters usually with more elderly people. But it still occurs. As someone who was raised in one of such ghettos described in Amsterdam, and later lived the dutch village life in a more rural village, I've seen both sides. I agree, integration of immigrant groups has had some serious struggles here and both ethnic groups (native dutch) and (immigrants) have an "Us vs them" mentality (not all but its definitely there). I sometimes feel that dutch people, possibly due to the tribal history, but definitely also due to an imperial/colonial cultural superiority complex have a high cultural insensitivity. Many find it hard to be respectful or mindful of foreign cultures, causing further rifts between immigrant and native communties. You can see this in dutch travel behavior when they're on holiday too. Dutch people can be very rude and culturally unaware when visiting other countries because they don't want to adapt.
Excuses. Nobody complains about Korean and Vietnamese immigrants. If immigrants can't integrate in western fucking Europe it's all on them not wanting to. So much I'd done for them. It's extremely infuriating to hear immigrants complaining about them not being "accepted " when the immigration has been the reason a lot of very nice places has been reduced to dumps by the newly imported cultures.
respectful and mindful could be solved by simply being scientific, i also hate that some Dutch ppl try to be nice in Bali too, just absurd, like cringe sometimes when they are being overly dramatic about the Hinduism thingy.
None of what you said matters. You are not owed respect in any way. They are not your "fellow Dutch", you are mixed, not Dutch, and you hold anti-Dutch ideology. You SHOULD get looks, you should get disrespect.
To think that the irish and italians integrated succesfully into the american culture is a wild statement. They work, and have dencent standards of living, is that what integration means in America?
Looking at marriage outside of your group is one way at looking at assimilation. Whether people like it or not, Hispanics have a large degree of interracial marriage.
Yes. Literally I don’t see any Polish Italian or German Americans still speaking there native languages. Nor do you see them still practicing stuff from there culture ide say the only thing left would the the cuisine.
@@spesamissaest1312 in my experience it isn't well received or tolerated by the average european. but it's difficult if not impossible to change when all established parties support it, and when the media stands ready to hound down everyone who disagrees with it, and label them as "racists"..
@@mortenovergaard7397 what have we done? Has there been massive protests? has there been violent riots? has there been political voting to change out the parties? Has there been anything done m8. No nothing we tolerate this and get exactly what we deserve.
@@spesamissaest1312 i'm not sure what you tolerate. personally i've always voted against this, and i've warned people around me about it. but man it's difficult when the media either ignores or twist facts to the 95% of people who don't follow politics.. the nationalist party actually did get 22% of the vote at some point, but then they cucked out and did basically nothing.. thanks a lot for that. the political class are just incompetent.. weak.. useless on this matter. they are very good at fighting a low unemployment rate and so on, but they refuse to do the right thing here. riots and so on won't change much. look at the trucker protest in canada and january 6th in the US. the politicians will keep doing what they're doing so far.
Western Europe is totaly lost..... Im so glad that Czech Poland and others central europe countries have migration majority from Eastern europe. With similar values and culture.
eastern europe has very low birthrates , the only difference is that they dont import foreign workers. they dont have real wealth as they are more dependant on the west. you are not seeing the real bigger problem which is pushing humanity to its demise .
A key factor is also that Latin American countries are migrant countries themselves, so, descendents of migrants, migrating again to a familiar culture is not hard. Also the natives have mixed with Europeans and Africans for 500 years (mostly with Europeans) and some of the countries have sizable Asian migrant communities as well. They are as good or better at assimilating migrants than the USA.
Ich kenne alleine in meinem Umfeld so viele Deutsche die sich mit anderen "Ethnien" gemischt haben, alleine diese würden auf die Barrikaden gehen und starke Unruhen auftreten. Die Amerikaner(Mit einer bestimmen Religionsgruppe) haben euch nachdem WW2 politisch und kulturell zerstört. Das alles ist kein Zufall.
Mass deportation will not work it will lead to massive and violent revolts not only by the immigrants but also by some on the left. You might be able to cut further immigration by cutting the social benefits for immigrants and and give a motivation to leave by giving financial incentive to leave plus absolute denial of re-entrance after. but the problem is to stay
It's unfair to just categorize "European" and "non European", there are huge differences between sub-Saharan African, Middleastern, east Asian, south Asian and Latin American in almost every way, from education, culture, behaviour, wealth level, crime levels, productivity to ability and willingness to integrate with other ethnicities
Well, those who make 99% problems in Europe are middle eastern and african muslims, so don't pretend you don't know who is meant by these "non-europeans".
Yes I think the video is quite flawed in several ways but still touches on some very interesting points. In fairness, the poster was limited by the way in which statistics are collected in the case studies/countries. He admits that Indian Hindus are typically well off in Britain and Pakistani Muslims tend to not integrate as well as other immigrants. I for one think this has less to do with culture and more so with class. The muslim lawyer from Islamabad, Pakistan will be a more productive and better integrated immigrant than a hindu social worker without university education from rural India. In short, the demographic "crisis" in Europe may be driven by "undesirable" immigrants. But they are not undesirable because of their skin colour or religion. They are undesirable because of their social standing in their respective countries (this indirectly ties in with the Islamic fundementalism discussed in the video - as the partiarchical and fundementalist tendencies are not as prevelant in the upper middle classes). Europe will need immigration in the long run to make up for its ageing/declining population. But the immigrants ought to be economically productive and willing to integrate. The best way to do this is to import the urban, educated, elite from the Global South. If America can bring in hundred of thousands of highly skilled Indian and Chinese tech professionals, I do not see why Britiain or Germany can't do the same. There is no shortage of them and oppurtunity in Europe remains higher than in India and China currently.
Eurøpean birthrate per female is 1.5 Afrìcan birthdate per female is over 5 (some places over 6) So as mass migratiøn continues, birthrate plus mass migratiøn has one obvious outcome. That’s not racìsm, that’s just basic math.
@@Xzazashake Where are you getting your information? What you said was true historically from Europeans that were farmers and other people that were farmers (generally in the past).However, the people coming aren’t farmers and this isn’t about labor. Birthrates aren’t just high in Afríca because it’s calculated and about security in old age. They are high because of the culture itself, and a pleasure vs lack of consequences attitude about s3x. Yes, North Africa has been a primary place people are coming from. The thing is Sub-Saharan Afríca has also brought over a lot of people… and if this recent wave is any indication looks like that will now be the primary source of mígrants.
@@Xzazashake I asked where you got the information because I was interested in reading it, do you have the name of the study? I’ve had these debates before and when someone else said something similar to me the study they mentioned was from over a decade ago. So it wasn’t up-to-date and that isn’t even considering if the source was objective I’ve already explained the difference in why birthrates were high in the past in Europe and the difference between that and African birthrates today. In Sub-Saharan Africa the major factors driving high birthrates in these countries include low contraceptive use, high adolescent fertility rates and a prevalence of polygamous marriages (and sadly in some places also due to very high rap3 rates, like Líberia for example where the estimate is 70%to 80% of wømen have been rap3d. Supposedly this trend in Libería has reversed but if I was female I still wouldn’t go there). When you say they are going down, that data is recently and only small percentage overall. However, the rates in comparison to much of the rest of the world are very high. Also, like I said, we aren’t seeing families coming into most of Europe, it’s over 90% military aged males.
My country is going to sh*t. I am Dutch and more than 50% of the population in my city (The Hague) is an immigrant. Everyone is so afraid of being called a racist, so many people don’t speak out. But the truth is we are rapidly losing our culture, values and connection with each other. Integration of immigrants has been massively unsuccessful, where many immigrants group up together in schools and in neighbourhoods. Many people don’t even speak Dutch anymore. Western values which originated from the enlightenment are also being threatened by a dogmatic religion which doesn’t tolerate any form of criticism, and has actually led to terrorism already. Then there’s also the fact that statistically immigrants are proportionately responsible for much more criminal behaviour than those of Dutch origin. We should stand strong and not be afraid to be proud of our nation and culture 🇳🇱🌷❤. (Also just to be sure, I have nothing against individual people or immigrants, I have many friends like them, some who even agree, I just don’t think mass immigration of groups who don’t properly integrate into our society will be beneficial and lead to happier living)
“The grass will always be greener” in Europe than in the Middel East, Asia or Africa. Migration to Europe has been taken place for millennia and it will never stop unless there will be a entirely different climate (a devastating effect of global warming ?) It’s as natural as it gets when you consider that people by nature are always trying to adapt themselves to a situation where life is better and chance of survival is higher. In fact human evolution is driven by migration, we are a species that can adapt because of our brain.
An absolutely tragic failure. There is no recovering from this. The same suicidal logic is being applied here in Canada as well. Our 'great' leader wants to pump in 500K immigrants per annum. There will be blood by the end of it.
at least you are not importing mostly conservative muslims, and muslims never integrate they conquer, or are repelled. It will get much worse before it gets better.
Wow. The US is a million a year which is horrible considering all the illegals we get. Canada has 10 times smaller a population and half the immigration 😬 good luck
You presented both sides in a fair way despite any personal biases. Excellent job as always! I'm glad your channel is taking off judging by all the comments. You deserve it!
I know most people hate Communism. But in my option it was kind of a blessing in disguise for Eastern Europe. The Communist system is the biggest reason eastern Europe is still more underdeveloped and traditional compared to western Europe,resulting in low levels of immigration there. One just needs to look at the differences between West and East Germany. East Germans are much more conserative and wary of strangers.
I also heard something very disturbing but interesting. France had high levels of immigration since the late 19th century,much sooner than other European countries. And dont forget France had low birth rates much sooner than other countries. Ethnic French people likely make up only half of the population if not less. The other half being Southern European and North African in origin.
@@kaiserbauch9092 every empire in history had this transition the Golden era of the Roman Empire was when they were able to connect the whole meditteranean
Eastern Europe has always been less developed. Always been conquered by powerful adversaries from huns to mongols to ottomans to Russians. The racial theorist of the 19th century didn’t even consider white Eastern European as culturally and socially the same level. The Nazis considered them sub human
As a East European living in the UK I am quite gobsmacked by naivety and political correctness of many Brits about the issue and overwhelming facts about negative impact of non-European immigration.
Most Poles I met were ok but they did bring crime also but the suppression of wages was the killer as they could live 14 to a house sharing bills where as a British family would be living as a family . They could not compete and wages fell at a time traditionally when Labour was a shortage employers would have been forced to pay more to attract labour. £100 billion left the country sent back to Poland on top of the billions we gave to the eu and poles who mostly worked minimum wage jobs could claim welfare so taking all this into consideration it cost us dearly . As for none white immigrants we don’t want them , never have which every poll has shown but they ignore us and all parties are are pro immigration.
It's a mistake to attribute the open door policies of the last 50 years to any particular political position. These policies have had bipartisan support from parties across the political spectrum. While many on the Left may engage in apologetics for these policies they are not who is driving them. As always it is big business that decides the direction a nation takes, and mass immigration is no exception. While the demographic arguments for immigration have merit (low birth rates are a big problem), it is economic considerations at the heart of it. Since the West started hollowing out their economies by offshoring everything they could get away with (and particularly decimating manufacturing) the economies there have been undergoing structural deflation and negative growth. Mass immigration is used to offset and hide this, as quickly growing the population grows the economy. More customers for business maintains demand, helping the service sectors of economies grow. Another reason for the big business lobby to pursue this is to undermine the bargaining power of workers. This is the reason wages have not kept up with either inflation or productivity growth over the past 40-50 years (worse in some countries over others). Pretty much all of the economic growth in the West since Globalization started has been a product of population growth, fuelled by immigration. On Muslim immigration, the West has to be very careful what kinds of Muslims it lets in. There are some branches and sects of Islam that are fundamentally incompatible with secular society. Wahhabism and Salafism are two big examples. These are extremist sects that advocate for the creation of a global Islamic caliphate under Sharia law. They are the religious groups responsible for Al Qaeda and ISIS (Wahhabism is also the state religion of Saudi Arabia). They believe apostates (people who leave the faith), among other people, should be executed. The example in the video showing 30% of Muslim respondents saying terrorism was justified in some circumstances tells you what you are inviting into your country when you import these types of Muslim (not all Muslims are extreme, many are even secular). All immigrants who hold religious views should be made to swear support for secularism in the public and government spheres, and declare that they agree the legal system of their adopted country supersedes all religious law, and that religious law is void and unenforceable in their new country. Having watched large scale immigration unfold in my country over the last 50 years my main observation is this: Assimilation takes time. A group of migrants may never fluently speak the local language, and they may maintain many of their original customs, but their children will be much more integrated. They go to local schools, learn the local language from a young age, and interact with other types of people through school and other activities. They may grow up with a foot in both worlds, but they will be adapted to and understand the local culture. After two generations people are generally fully assimilated. What can get in the way of this though is the creation of exclave ghettos where people of the same origin dominate an area exclusively. This inhibits integration, as instead of new migrants being forced to adapt to a new environment they can just recreate their old one in a new location. Migrants living in communities like this can go their whole lives barely interacting with the native population. Denmark is on the right track in limiting neighbourhoods to 30% max of any one ethnicity. Lastly, on the subject of skilled migration. Believe it or not, Western countries importing skilled migrants from the developing world are exacerbating refugee crises and increasing the number of economic migrants. As the West skims all of the smartest and most able people from other countries, luring them in with more money, they completely undermine the ability of those countries to improve and develop. They stay poor and under developed because they don't have enough skilled or educated people who could form the basis of a middle class, and who could build a more advanced economy and society. This then encourages more poor people from those countries to try and migrate to rich countries. If the West was serious about helping the developing world, and if they want to ever see the end of waves of poor people knocking on their door, the would stop poaching the developing worlds best people. They would invest more in education and train their own doctors and engineers.
"As always it is big business that decides the direction a nation takes" This is as an absurd statement to make about the Ponzi-scheme states of Western Europe, especially Germany which is literally destroying it's industrial economy in a pathetic attempt at 'net-zero.' Regardless, mass immigration does not grow the economy period - as clearly proven by the current state of the Eurozone and how it has fared since 2013 when mass migration began in earnest. In fact, migrants are a dependent group that serve as little more than a net drain on the finances of the state. Slightly less than half of all council estates in London are occupied by foreigners and the Dutch government recently revealed that it has blown more than 400 billion euro on migrants in the last 25 years.
Thousands of years of bloodlines, history, culture, and the sacrifice of millions undone in a few short decades. This tragedy will be used as an example by future civilizations of what to avoid
WTF is wrong with yall?! The right will win the end and all the damage will be reversed. Why are you so hopeless? Dont you feel the tides turning? Now is our time.
@@melhiott7977 so Did your ancestors felt that they betrayed *their* ancestors when they converted to Christianity from paganism? Times change, culture change but boy does it feels good to be on the gaining side.
@@greyralph1637 my ancestors were the first ever nation to accept Christianity as their state religion, darling. Unlike the Islamic conquest of our neighbors, Iranians, there was no blood.
@@melhiott7977 doesn’t matter, no one forced my British parents to embrace islam either. If Europe wants to survive it must accept Islam or go the way of dodo( or japs)
I feel like leftist talking points weren't addressed here. The massive uneven exchange between the global north and south was brushed off as "the cruel lottery of where one has been born". The north also blocks any attempts at nation building, and it's countless incursions into the South's development throughout the 20th century are a major cause of migration. This of course doesn't mean change in the ethnical composition of a population won't bring negative effects, (social unrest even) - but we must consider the fact that our cherised ethnostates and individualistic, christian, social democracy loving culture is a product of just a few decades (to 1-2 centuries at best), sprinkled in with some genocide, forced relocations, uneven treaties and civil wars. Some people suggest that the current state of our nations are the exception, not the norm, and we should be more open minded. Although I don't really subsribe to these ideas, and certainly don't think that they negate the utter lack of social negotiation from policymakers; but they are important ideas to confront nevertheless.
The global south is where it is because of low IQ and geography. We owe them nothing. Also why should we (the global north) care? This video is addressing our people. We dont need the approval of the south.
Whether you should be open minded is secondary, the point is that this situation would brew such inequalities that lead to the current european issues regardless. It's similar to the argument about democracy in israel: when you are an apartheid state, how do you keep democracy? The state is already fundamentally undemocratic by having to enforce apartheid. Yet apartheid itself heightens tensions, inequalities, demographic troubles, violence and conflit etc that lead to a path where this contradiction is solved only by further opening up/democratization which means dealing with the Palestine issue (and even then it has long term legacies afterwards) or by becoming more authoritarianism as we are seeing now in Israel. The alternative is jugging around in this contradictory state for as long as one can, but the situation might well become unsustainable with time when you least expect. When it comes to nation states, it's similar for Europe, but originally only at an external level - no wonder they left their colonies exactly when the alternative was giving colonized peoples the right to vote. The most obvious case perhaps were Algeria and Portugal (as soon as they decided they didn't want a dictatorship, independencies were given automatically).
Your analysis is accurate. It's sad more then anything to witness Europe's downfall. I think you explained very well why immigration works differently in Europe and the USA. Its so frustrating that people don't get a say regarding their own lives in democracies, no less, and when they do speak out they get scolded and accused of being racist by privileged people who will never suffer the consequences of these policies. You mentioned the Lebanonazation process. Seams people forget what extreme diversity and cultural differences can do to a country. I'm not a European, but I do love Europe, I wish it's not to late for that beautiful continent.
what possible political beliefs could you have that would make you think AMERICA is better than germany? they have worse cities, no welfare, more violence and a more open immigration policy? there is nothing for you there
instead of heading to the center of the world's decaying global system, stick to germany and find a wife and have some children and do an honest productive none bullshit job. that is how you can participate in saving your nation. otherwise you are just being a superficial edgy egoist teenager who is looking for comfort and material satisfaction.
As a Dutchman we are jealous of denmark asylum rules. Here we have too many fake refugees that we cant send away. And we give them houses before dutch people get houses
My parents are immigrants and even I think that mass immigration is terrible for Europe. Especially those that immigrate illegally. My dad's nephew keeps trying to ask him ways to get to Europe illegally. He's so pathetic honestly. My dad keeps telling him to study and do something good with his life but he won't listen lol. So we cut contact with him. Also, I hate the way that the people that immigrate here from my parent's country often have backwards views, don't assimilate well and have to shove Islam down people's throats all the time. I'm an atheist and I hate Islam lol. So seeing all these Muslims immigrate here is just worrying. Also I hate that people are usually on two different extremes: 1. Racists that think no immigrants should be allowed in at all. 2. Leftist woke people who think any and all immigrants should be allowed in.
Theres something called the silent majority and when it comes to your last point we are against both the far left and far right. Its just that u only hear from the louder minority
The one thing that boilers my blood is when Europeans are losing our countries. We called far right, when non white people are destroying our countries
Western Europe has become decadent, its immunity has disappeared. Once upon a time, I would have liked to live there, but today it is unimaginable. I am Hungarian and I am very happy that I live here and not there.
@AnthonyRizzuti Died without ever coming to the front? Cause the war was ended by Spanish Flu. How pathetic was that, wishing to die of a curable disease in modern time?
@@TurkishEmpire2023 Name one thing that got better that isnt in direct or indirect connection to technological progress (like peace) challange. You cant name one thing. 1900 europe was heaven
If this narrative is not urgently and massively pushed to European masses and no action is taken, native European nations will find themselves in reservations in several generations. KaiserBauch, you are doing God's work.
Our politicians know. They don't care--they're all in on it. I think we should try to make peace with it, build our small communities and keep to ourselves/care for our families.
I would say for one, European countries especially Western european nations and the US should stop meddling in Middle eastern and African national affairs. If you aren't responsible for their current wellbeing then I don't see the point to why you'd have to take them in as refugees. If you do want immigrants, why not allow only the ones who are willing to assimilate or are highly skilled individuals. I am sure there would be plenty of people who would want to move into Europe and assimilate instead of forcing their ideology upon the natives. Europe should stop meddling and accepting refugees and focus on their identity first. This is one of the reason why Eastern Europe is still a lot better compared to Western Europe.
It's very bizarre that Europe has relatively recently lived through the collapse of Yugoslavia, the forced ethnic swaps in Greece and turkey, the separation of checkoslovakia, the forced removal of ethnic Germans from Poland and east Prussia, the ethnic partitioning of Austria Hungary and most of these happened between people who look relatively similar with relatively similar histories but different cultures. Now I'm supposed to believe that sub Saharan African people and Arabs, who for the most part seem to actually despise European culture, are going to make European culture better?
Yeah okay man. Yugoslavia is a horrible example. Yugoslavia broke up because of many reasons. But not because of "different culture". It broke up because people in Yugoslavia thought they are different which we aren't. And culture is a horrible example. Serbs in banja luka have a different culture then from serbs who live in Eastern herzegovina. But both are serbs. So yeah...
@@tomgu2285you're not making the point you think you are.
Correct, even people with similar appearance and culture will not integrate if they see each other as different, even if they are not. Best to not force cultures to clash.
We don't have to believe anything. We know that wherever Afrikans or arabs move that place goes for worse.
@@tomgu2285you’re correct, i want to add on to what you said, i think the different cultures hate in the balkans are more of a symptom of a collapsed, once great multi ethnic nations/country, xenophobia is the only way for banana republic microstates in the balkans to cope with the fact that they caused the breakup and don’t want to admit they’re not different
They are brothers not enemies but too much resentment for losing something great caused them to think otherwise
north africans enjoy european culture so its not too bad ig
The fact that Danmark managed to implement such rules without receiving a major backlash is astonishing to me. I bet that if any Eastern European nation would try to copy those policies they'd be called out for being racist and backward.
Who cares how you will be called?
@@anon2034 I don't know, probably lots of people, usually people like to be perceived in a positive light. Me personally? Yeah...IDGAF. Still, I find those double standards kind of hilarious.
If I recall correctly the UN and the EU weren't very happy about that, but I haven't heard about any "sanctions".
Small country privilege.
Denmark have small land area. It's barely possible to cram anymore over 10 million people without having to build large apartment blocks everywhere. Netherlands, Belgium and Britain are in serious trouble
Didn't you guys know? If you are having any issues in a society, letting tens of thousands of young African men loose with no jobs who don't speak your language is going to fix all of the issues
It’s millions actually.
sounds like a greta solution
Racist
@@RonnieDeVeyra. how ? by not liking rape ?
Not all African men do this kind of stuff if you
actually look at police records they are predominantly created by native habitants
Seeing France right now is the evidence you need
Yep. Soon it’ll get worse everywhere else
Why cant france be France‘s fault?
@@historyandpoliticsexplaine4876 it is france's fault. they let people in
@@gggghhhh1288that's not exactly the case, the french have a system similar to the american one where it doesn't matter if you are a full blooded French or hail from somewhere else, the french state and system consider you french regardless of if you do have ancestoral ties to the motherland or not
@@gggghhhh1288 And they crippled many of the nations the people are coming from.
An immigration system can work when:
A) its not in too high numbers
B) the people are not ravaged by war
France broke both these rules, they enmasse imported people from regions they themselves devastated like libya.
Places like niger were robbed blind and had puppet leaders installed, making places unstable leads to mass illegal immigration and causes people to not be a civil as you would like.
An immigrant from saudi arabia will be much better behaved than an immigrant from another arab country that was invaded for various reasons such as war causing ptsd and weakening morals.
France killed themselves and the nations the immigrants came from, its sad because they all could have succeeded but they didn't want that.
Its like how the usa is fine with most immigrants because they are in low numbers and are typically well off enough to make it to the usa, but have a problem with latino immigrants because the nations below the usa were destabilized.
Now the people are coming enmasse and the they are ravaged by problems totally avoidable if the cia didn't go crazy with funding cartels and doing coups.
Just go to Paris and Brussels to see the future of most western european nations if nothing changes
Yes, the police leave's them mostly alone and helps them and we ethnic Europeans need to pay the price its insane.
Burssels is the worst city I have ever visited in my entire life.
@@Jimmy_The_Goat how come?
@@pablolostum insane amounts of very poor immigrants straight up grabbing you on the street, trash everywhere, people peeing on walls in broad daylight. The native Belgians are also quite hostile and rude (no wonder).
Brussels is dull and boring. But the worst city I visited is Charleroi, about an hour from Brussels. Worse than the worst looking and most drap cities I have visited in Eastern Europe.
We just had elections here in FInland and every major political party except one advocated for increasing the amount of "non-EU employment based immigration" to 50k a year. In contrast, less than 45k children were born in Finland in 2022. I don't need a Master's degree in mathematics to know that should their plan succeed Finland would be minority European in my lifetime and minority Finnish in my parents'.
Your government is forced to attract skilled immigrants from other countries because your population is not having enough children and a society with larger old people and less young people cannot sustain.
Maybe start having kids instead?
perkele, varaudu
@@teemukolunkulma9308 well luckily we can lwys just move to Denmark xd
If I know European history is that Europeans are nice until they are not
@@chipcook5346 I think both the assessment and description of the US is wrong. Firrslty it's not the only country that successfully assimilated immigrants, you have at least all main anglophone countries plus Argentina and Uruguay, and maybe arguably Brazil, Chile, Cuba and Malaysia (although the first three were way less immigrants in number and the last it's arguable how successfully). Other "success stories" include chinese migration in the Philippines and Thailand, which were so seemlessly assimilated people hardly even know about it. I'm sure if I took a bit longer I could think of other examples (19th century France and Switzerland received a lot of immigrants, etc).
Anyway, I also disagree with the prospect that was mentioned that current assimilation in the US is less than in the past. Linguistic assimilation is visibly happening, and that is still following the three generation form that the italians and germans did in the past. Most contemporary immigrants in the US (central american and mexican) indeed have more in common with the subtract population of the parts of the US they go too than most great wave immigrants ever did. So there's that.
Finally I think you forgot the role of distance. The US is shielded by nature and this it receives people who elect to go there historically, even their refugees have more or an immigrant mentality. That's not necessarily the case for Europe, where people can arrive more easily. There are also cultural traits and even political ideas that impact assimilation positively or negatively. I think the picture is more complex than just a land grab, as for example land wasn't offered to immigrants in Argentina and there assimilation was basically total and if anything larger in the cities.
Britain has fallen. Sweden has fallen. France has fallen.
All by simply letting certain people just move in... The incompetence of some cultures is amazing.
Italy has fallen. Switz is next.
@@ReasonAboveEverythingBlame your country for stealing other countries weali. If they had let them be, no one would care to love to Europe
You remind me of The west has fallen meme.
The west has fallen
Most Muslims believe that Islam is their Nation and they don't respect National culture traditions or Philosophy of any other country.
Modern Citizen is created by modern education and culture. And respect that completely.
I'm from an Islamic country, you're wrong
@@uuuu-h3mHe is right
In Islam you have to live by the rule of the land
But I don't get you guys, at least properly understand what you are hating on at least get your facts right.
exactly@@despacito2
@@despacito2
The trick is to make it their land.
Well, you all know how this ends. War, famine, concentration camps. The only question is who will be the guards and who the inmates.
Haha
Hopefully not us whites
Trust me we Europeans Will be the guards and these invaders the inmates.
I agree that it is very hard (probably impossible) to really melt into the north-western society. I can tell as a Pole living several years in Norway (I suppose other Nordic countries are similar). I was working in the hospital, almost exclusively with native Norwegians and despite speaking quite fluently Norwegian, I wasn't able to start any friendship there. It is true that I was treated fair, everyone was smiling a lot and there was plenty of "hyggelig", politically correct small talk. That's it. Any kind of relationship after work. It was dificult to thrive this way so I started to look for friends outside the workplace. I've found SAPS (Stavanger Active People Society) consisted exclusively of immigrants from all over the world (majority of them from Eastern Europe). What else was striking, there were no muslims in SASP. They've just sticked together with other muslims only. In other words - there were three, completely different communities there - Norwegians, non muslim imigrants and muslim imigrants.
Cóż, myślę że w polskie społeczeństwo też dość trudno jest się wtopić.
@@dariuszgaat5771 mysle ze latwiej niz w zachodnioeuropejskie.
Får du barn så får ikke de samme problem, det er alltid første generasjonen som sliter med mens andre generasjonen integrerer seg fint
This is a demografic timebomb.
Solidarity on Wich our walfare state is based has diappeared.
More and more Europeen places become third world dump holes. Poor, violent and fragmented. Westerners are too decadent, blasé, weak, inert to tackle the problem. Laws to weak and ineffective.
Schoollevels in Europe go down. International tests show. (pisa-tests)
As long they can go on Holliday, being "themselves" in all kind of social political niches and lifestyles, it is oké.
It is the end of a civilisation and Will not turn for the better.
The politics don't see.
Right needs cheap labour and consuments
Left needs poor dissatisfied victimised voters who feel discriminated..
As a Dutch person occasionally working in emigration services, aswell as my mother who helps at emigration centers- we strongly disagree. Poles integrate quickly and easilly into the Netherlands. Very few Poles are recogniseable as Poles after living here for 10 years or so.
It’s a real drama, here in Barcelona we were proud of our low crime and our traditions, now I can’t sleep with windows open because Georgians are cleaning many houses around every day, we can’t wear any thing of value going out because a moroccan can harm us to take it out, my daughter is scare of migrant rapist looking for a prey, my wife is harass at night by Pakistani taxi drivers , when I go to the center city I’m the only one that can say that their grand parents where born there. For me is really sad what we have done.
It’s probably the fault of the system for not punishing criminals the right way. Still, Barcelona’s crime rate is very low, so those things you mention happen very rarely
@Christian Doretti I trust his statement more than the statistics
@@youtubeisdeletingmycomment3235 I precisely trust more the statistics because word of mouth can be easily manipulated in favour of the political discourse.
@@youtubeisdeletingmycomment3235 Lol.
@@youtubeisdeletingmycomment3235 That would be an egregious act of irrationality. The facts say crime rates are low. Not that they do not happen. So why are taking his statement as if it is evidence of something greater other than it is as expected of the facts?
I am from Spain and this is terrifying, here in Barcelona the situation is out of control, in 5 years things have changed a lot and very quickly. I'm afraid of the future
Whole Muslim world orgasms while thinking about making Spain Muslim majority again
I'm French and I fear the same thing. I'm in a small city, but they are very "welcoming". As a women, I'm incresingly anxious about going outside: there is bands of people starting fights, attacking cars at night, and even in the day there is drug deals in the historic neighborhoods. The police is powerless (or it's deliberate ?), and I don't feel safe if there is ever a problem happening. I can't even speak out my fears, because "I'm a monster" for wanting to feel safe.
@@mandolorian9893 I'm not responsible for what happened before I was born. And it's not about "repayment" for our ""sins"", we are repaying the babyboom. The immigration wave that went in France to repopulate is already setteled. Now all of Africa's young men are coming, but it's only because Europe makes everything they can to prevent them for developping their economy, so they can have more immigration to compensate the low births. But it's not working they way they thought it would. There is nothing for them in europe, since factories were sent to China a long time ago. There is not enough work for the locals in the first place.
Also, France was good for Africa at the time of colonisation, and a lot of african people still love France very much. So I don't know where your point is, but if you are confused between Belgium and France because we speak the same language, that's a you problem.
Es hora de aprender árabe, no hay otra alternativa. Allahu Akbar.
@@mandolorian9893 These are normal people who had no say in what their government did in the past. Don't be a hypocrite. If your world was being turned upside down you would also cry in pain as your culture does nothing to stop the situation. The French government cares not for its own people. Your average native Frenchman does not deserve this. You are the only hateful one in this argument. I wouldn't wish cultural and demographic downfall on ANYONE. You seem to hate all French people and believe they are all guilty for something that only the rich elites in their government could want and benefit from the most.
I am a German who's living in Germany and it is really crazy what is going on right now. In Schools and Universities Ethnic Germans are basically a Minority at this point and Islamic people are very often a majority. Honestly i do not have a personall hatred against Muslims, some of my friends are muslimic but it is a really weird situation and i am convinced if this trend keeps progressing we are going to have very similar politics to the Nazis very soon.
Edit: Also, what you are saying in the Video about immigrants is kinda correct. There is zero to no problem with European immigrants in Germany. Nobody minds Polish workers or Italians who live here.There is also a difference between mixed marriages and "normal immigrants". People who have (for example) a German father and Turkish Mother are mostly not an issue.Things only get complicated when immigrants insist on being foreign and fundamentally rejecting other cultures.
You won't because you won't have any power. It isn't a 1925. Perhaps they will take over and you'll have a Islamist State, soon, with Germans as second class citizens.
Take a look at London, Sadik Kahn hates white English people, wants them banned from London
Well, if the trend continues, you won't have the Nazis back. You'll have sharia law.
Lol
I am AMERICAN-- the real one, brown skin. Not a White illegal British settler.
Here, Germans and their progeny are the highest in existence from Europe. It seems like you people like to complain whenever the tables turn. Come and get your people, take them back to Germany ( particularly Trump), then we can talk.
Maybe there are some problems,but at the end they will intigrate !It just takes way longer!Not realy a big problem,just not perfect!
No European was ever asked.
Asked for a complete irreversible change to our nations.
We never voted for it.
We were never told.
This has all been done to us without our consent through the backdoor.
Pretty sure anti immigration parties have existed for 50 years now and they never got the most votes.
So youre wrong. We could have voted anti immigration but we didnt because of our white guilt and political correctness
Shouldn’t have colonized and stolen all the resources, face the consequences now😢😢😢
“No European was ever asked.”
Hungarians were asked actually. The turnout was less than 50%, but like 97% of the votes said no to migrants.
@@toasterirl2920 Can you quantify the stolen resorces or are you just repeating anti-western talking points?
@@toasterirl2920 What does the actions of long-dead elites have to do with the fate of average European peoples?
Europe is making the same mistakes the Native Americans made back in 1492
Worse than that, they aren't even resisting or fight back.
Because europe killed the lands of these people to begin with they have no other place to go to
Because were also not being genocided or oppressed by the immigrants?
(And the terrorism and knife attack stuff is totally overblown when you look at statistics)
@@spaceowl5957 Fair enough and you are right. It's not a violent destruction of Europe, it's a quieter one, but the result is the same.
@@spaceowl5957
How many people are beaten, raped, robbed, groomed, murdered, sex trafficked, overdosed, subsidized while the government calls you a racist?
And in the American case, affirmative action, minority status and federally protected while all this is going on! 🤬
Why? So the donors, the globalists and the elite can sell more toilet paper for the luv of money 🤬
You want to play war with Russia and the Chinese and all their satellite countries.
Let me remind you the grand game is just beginning and the Russians and Chinese are masters at backing an insurgency. It’s the same leftist rhetoric that overthrew western civilizations in Africa and Asia.
Our governments are fighting proxy wars with their citizens and don’t even know it.
I don’t think you get it. But the time will come when you do!
"Africa is for africans, Asia is for asians, but Europe must be for everyone " - cant remember who said it
There are more black people in England than white people in basically all of Africa apart from SA
Europe in 1700s: "The world for Europe"
Europe Now: Europe for Europeans😢
@@bossman34levy80 those dont exist. They arent european
@@joeywheeler8362? Right, cuz no one else ever colonized anything ever.. 🤡 take
Douglas Murray
Western Europe spends so much on pensions & healthcare for its old people while denying life for those who would have been the children of the current young generation. And while brining in immigrants to live those lives in Europe instead. Its a terrible way for its old people to treat its young people.
All by design.
Agreed, I will emigrate once I have the financial means. They can sort it out for themselves. I'm 28 yo male btw
Roman logo, cowboy music, Slavic accent. xD
Feels almost American
@@benwoodruff1321 Lmao how tf
Ha!
As long as he's not
singing "(Ghost)
Riders in the Sky"
I suppose we are
okay ^_^
German name
More like indian accent 😂😂😂
As a Polish - American living now in The Netherlands I must say that your analysis is really spot on both sides of the Atlantic. I am impressed by the depth of your research and supporting materials. Great work and best of luck.
you live in the Netherlands? My condolences!
Wracaj do ojczyzny, do Polski ❤️🇵🇱
You need to go back.
@@xdlol59 To juz jest Ukropol. 😐
@@Locutusoftheblackpillum Dosłownie dobrze, że Ukranińcy przyjechali, bo brakowało rąk do pracy i mamy okropnie słabą demografię. Pamiętaj każdy Ukrainiec to jeden ciapaty mohmed mniej. Pojedź na zachód, zobacz jak tam jest "super" z murzynami i ciapatymi i innymi ninja. 95% Ukraińców zachowuje się wzorowo i szybko się asymiluje, tacy imigranci to skarb.
Sweden will certainly become a mainstream case-study on this subject, in the future.
we can add France and Belgium were mass replacement migration has reshape the country in in less than a few decades
Same as the Arab Emirates Who only have 10% native population. Why don't you hear about them? It's because they live well
@@nicola7735only because it's maintained by a quasi slave population that isn't citizens and that's not a society I'd hope we want to see😊
@@nicola7735 Because the UAE has a very strong Islamic identity that doesn't tolerate discidents. If Europe treated migrants like the UAE does, there would be no problem.
@@nicola7735 Because they are fundamental islamic nation,and the majority of population is literally a modern slave caste. Only majority european countries are targeted,not just ex-colonialist. Sweden,Ireland,Poland are getting/going to get the same treatment,and they never were colonial super-powers.
Whether you're an actual european or not,know, there will be no Shire.
Illegal immigration is a minor issue in Europe. Mass immigration is mostly composed of legal immigrants. The governments are the ones to blame, not the migrants (or their descendants) who came legally to Europe
It's both. The system clearly wants mass migration, but the migrants are generally not suitable for Europe and should leave.
Thanks for the useless comment which summarises the Author of this Video's point of view and conclusion...
@@tomasvrabec1845 Your comment is even more useless
@@GrosPointRouge based
@@GrosPointRouge Actually... My comment at least informs you that you managed to summarise this view. Without it copying the video nor trying to create some sort of moral point which was talked about anyway.
The topic even being concentrated around the problems of Mass Migration rather than pure migration as it talks about rate of migration and rate of assimilation, with an underlying contextual differences affecting these rates.
The legalism or illegalism of migration becomes increasingly null with the rate being so high... As measures are need to limit even legal migration (thus by default affecting illegal migration).
History gives us several examples where this could go that I think are quite realistic:
1. Lebanon. Looses any cohesion and becomes de facto devided into ethno-religious enclaves periodically fighting each other.
2. South Africa. Contrary to Lebanon the country is still in one piece (SO FAR) but society becomes split up into heavenly segregated communities (that's likely the pre stage to the Lebanon scenario, SA is less and less of a functional country every day and various armed groups, like security forces number more than police and military combined, which is a huge red flag)
2. The ethno cultural majority consolidates around some shared idea (likely stuff like being white or being Muslim ect.) and forces other groups to conversion or exiles them.
I think that, for western and central Europe, the last two are most likely over the long run. At some point the wealth of nations like Germany ect will nose dive significantly (since they are doing very little to maintain it, just look up for german politics to understand that.), which will inevitably destroy the apathetic culture towards these problems.
I think that nations such as Spain, Italy, France (still has a quite nationalistic culture) are likely to go the third way, meanwhile I see countries like Sweden or England (likely without Scotland and Northern Ireland at this point.) could well go the south african scenario.
I predict a future, where large parts of southern/Latin Europe as well as post communist central/eastern Europe consolidate around some kind of new ideology, which will likely lead to migration of more native Europeans there, effectively making these the new centers of the region, meanwhile I think that germanic countries will decline greatly (Germany, Sweden, England).
As for who will actually win if both sides (natives and migrants) will go even remotely all in, it's clearly the natives: they have the countryside, control over the infrastructure, like electricity, water and food supply, as well as as making up most of the police and, especially, the military. A fight of the immigrants VS. natives and respective loyalists for let's say France would look like this: radicalized immigrant youths get besieged in Paris and Marseille ghettos (by land area they are not that large compared to the rest of these cities), till they surrender or these areas get stormed, ending in a bloodbath. In return terrorist organizations might organize bombings or something (not enough to win a war)...
Also keep in mind that countries like Italy or Greece are only that dysfunctional, because EU northern European subsidies are allowing their political class to behave that way. If German money dries up they will likely go into nationalist dictatorships, shoot boats in the water, get energy supplies via war ect. (Greece, for example, has a bad financial policy but a military more prepared to fight (and a population to support it) than Germany, which, in times of trouble, is far more important).
Not even entering in that bit of doom scenario, just want to point out the role of Syria and Israel in the breakdown of Lebanon. It isn't like Lebanon just collapsed by itself internally, it was a mix of Israel and Syrian meddling and weaponizing of minority groups mixed of course with sectarization.
"shoot boats in the water" - hahahah omg
*GreekGigaChad.jpg*
How in your opinion Central-Eastern Europe will deal with it's low birth rate without non-european immigrants?
@@marysia5365 Yust like east asia, by facing it face on. I think that every country will develop differently, but here are some guesses: low birthrate mean an end of economic growth, future generation will likely get used to it. Some will profit from it. Places like Poland or Czechia, for example will absorb most of the available people from eastern Europe (maybe with some immigration from Latin America), but countries in the slavic-orthodox east and the balcans will, for the most part, have no such options, as they are way to unappealing. Populations will collapse, the economy in the cities will decline, reruralization will take place, new ideologies will take hold, likely based upon the importance of children and small town community, some countries might desintegrate entirely, Russia most likely. Im almost sure, that, over the next 50 years or so, places like Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Bulgaria ect will see their populations collapse several fold (this is a exponential process, most projections don't count in, that, if you have two pensioneers for every one in their 20s, these young people will flee in unheard of masses). These will be the "fuel" for the new core nations for the forseeable future. Also, many of these countries will fall to pro natalist right wing dictatorships, likely running on an ageist young vs old campaign. Much of the current value system will die, replaced by new belive structures (likely, at first, a white homeland, nativist, secular nationalist form of right wing ideology). I thing chances are high that most of the orthodox world will desintegrate and, through a painful process, slowly become a fronteer region, being assimilated into whatever the rest of Europe turns into. Orthodox culture will slowly die. I, honestly, think that the future of Europe is fundamentally non Christian, becoming, together with East Asia, a lab for totally new ideologies, but that's another topic.
@@user-uf2df6zf5w Im from Poland and imo those immigrants from Eastern Europe and Latin America are just a temporary solution, they can't supply us forever.
In long term we must improve our native birth rate but the reason it's so low now is in my opinion rather cultural than economic. It just become an expected norm to stay childless in your 20s and have fun even if you can already afford having children and then maybe start family in your 30s when most woman aren't fertile enough to have more than 1-2 children at that age. If you do otherwise you are seen as strange or stupid. I have no idea how to change that.
You probably can't just force people to breed more earlier, unless you have some totalitarian power to ban condoms or something. But Poland is still objectively far from becoming totalitarian.
Excellent presentation. It makes me so angry that this is going on. Noone wants it, yet it keeps happening! The political correctness is vile.
@@chinesetaxevader I moved from Copenhagen to my native island of Bornholm, because I couldn't stand all the headscarves and Arabic-speaking immigrants on the streets. I felt like a stranger. But now 19 years later, I see the same thing slowly happening here.
@@brittadueandersen2519weirdo
There is a certain type of middle class (especially upper middles class) person that actively encourages this. My sister fits into this category and when we discuss this and I say for example that the UK had more than 650k net immigration, she first said where did the numbers come from then said you need immigration this fill labour shortages. When I said this was adding to the housing crisis she said that the real problem is the government isn't building enough houses. I pointed out that it is not reasonable to expect a country the size of the UK to cover such a huge increase in the population. Then she just said the government can't do anything. She is from the UK but lives in Luxembourg (away from the end point problems of the kind of immigration policy she supports).
It's like a mental virus that is spreading without control. That's on the part of the general population, the politicians know full well what they're doing.
@@crazytown1146 England needs immigration have u seen the aging population
People who believe that everyone is equal and are or can become good people if given the opportunity, are very naive.
Everyone is equal based on their intrinsic human worth.
But not everyone is compatible culturally and no one has the right to replace other ethnicities with their own based on the notion that we're all equally valuable.
white is the ultimate race.
There is no more attractive or powerful.
Remember who brought the modern law to all@@Waywind420
@@Waywind420 there is no intrinsic worth
@@stevenjames6830 You are unbelievable just for being alive in a universe that's full of dead rocks.
@@Waywind420 Living organism can also have negative value.
when it comes to "partial migrant backround" you should not forget that many decendents of ethnic groups do not count anymore as "migrant backround" in the statistics, because they are from 2nd or 3rd generation and born in the country.
Immigration in europe isn't that old though
@@FOLIPE oh its incredibly old, its rather a matter of scale. Its always happened, But with modern transportation, it is far easier for large migrations to take place in a much shorter period of time. After all, societies throughout history have been more migratory than long-term sedentary, even though limited sedentary lifestyles existed with semi-nomadic groups even prior to agriculture, mass sedentary lifestyle is relatively new in human history.
@@Reivehn Let me clarify what I mean then, large scale migration is a relatively recent phenomenon in europe, so it's not like there's a lot of second and third generation immigrants around with the exception of France, UK and Switzerland, plus war refugees from WW2. Also, of course "people have always moved". People have also long been "using steam" to cook, but the industrial revolution is something recent (200ish years) and not ancient. Similarly with immigration. It being a matter of scale makes it a different phenomenon
@@FOLIPE It might be, I somehow have 1.1% Arab DNA (from those DNA tests), and I only have a record of north European ancestors (British, Scandinavian).
@@kel8026 These DNA tests are not metrics of ancestry or family origin, they are like metrics of what your dna looks like compared to sample populations. As they increase their samples the precision improves, but there's no connection necessarily to specific lands, it's always similarity to people groups. People groups always have some level of contact. I don't know where you are from but conections between north africa and Europe are known, from the slave trade to merchants and so on. It could just be statistical noise too. But that isn't quite the same process as modern mass migration
The last time immigration was so high in Europe we had 800 years of "Dark Ages"
Well - yes, but it was not so dark.
It brought ome new inventions: printing press, gunpowder, banking, compass, gothic architecture, education system, musical notation, mechanical clock :)
The Islam is destroying europe already
@@jerzyzbiaowiezy6249 banking
@@jerzyzbiaowiezy6249 It brought new inventions from Asia
Jews were already there since 27 bc
Just look at Latvia's numbers and You will understand, why many Latvians decide to leave some regions of country or country completely.
baltic states are in a dire situation , even without migration they are doomed to extinction on their own.
as you can see migration is only a symptom of a bigger problem that isnt often being addressed and that problem is also showing up in asian economies as well with the same effects albeit asians are more reluctant to import foreign workers.
the system is the problem.
@@verandi3882 No, You are wrong. Just look at data and facts. Baltic countries was first ones, to experience migration and population displacement on large scale in 20 century. We still still are dealing with aftermaths of it. Much still need to be done, but we are rising from ruins and rising fast. Country size doesn't matter in this case.
@@verandi3882 same with the balkan countries
@@artursbondars7789 Yep, you're right. The native Baltics are going to go extinct because they don't want to have kids. Unfortunate, but is what it is.
@@artursbondars7789 Russians and other Slavs are White and Christian. Plus before that during the Russian Empire most of your cities had a Baltic German majority and big % of Jews and Slavs. You balts were only majorities in the countrysides
All immigration is not bad. Muslim is.
Your children and their children and so on, will be muslim.
I wouldn’t want Asians or Africans either.
You're gonna suffer cause there's only gonna be more of us!!!!
@@tosamja117 and the beauty of Islam is you too will have to run away again ..to Antarctica? Or where?
@@Sorted_av oh really? No I don't think so. I ain't running anywhere. As I said there's only gonna be more of us and you'll be an old man watching that happen
Great video, an important thing to note is that third generation immigrants are in Sweden, Netherlands and Denmark considered as of "Swedish/Danish/ Dutch-origin" even though they haven't intermarried.
Lmao! What a joke
European countries try hard to cope and change definitions to make the demographic profile look good. So people don’t start crying and protesting.
This is why you often cannot trust the statistics you're reading. And that's not the only loophole.
Thank you!
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
Currently reading “The Strange Death of Europe.” By Douglas Murray, fascinating stuff. It’s really happening.
To quote Murray, “So they say, if it doesn’t benefit the culture, it’ll benefit the economy. If it doesn’t benefit the economy, it’ll benefit the culture.”
Great read 👍
My only beef with the book is he shy's away from the root causes to "stay in the correct lane". You can prove there is a migration crisis, you can prove there are low birth rates, you can prove these birth rates are economically/socially linked. They talk about exhaustion, about a loss in traditionalism, and religious beliefs. They dance around the issue and NEVER dare speak out about the cause.
It isn't some shadow cabal. It isn't some grand conspiracy. It's the baby boomers and Gen X last hurrah before they clock out. This is what they deem just and good. This is doctrine of self hate they inflicted on their children for decades. They inherited global prosperity from the sacrifices of their forebears, did NOTHING but exploit their gift, and when that ran out they mortgaged their children's futures.
A Generation of Sociopaths by Bruce Gibney details this in America. It applies doubly so for EU.
It is very good book, but even better, in my opinion, is the book Reflections on the Revolution In Europe: Immigration, Islam and the West by Christopher Caldwell. I feel like Murrey took a lot of inspiration from that book.
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
Not, it's a sloppily researched book with many obvious mistakes. For example, he constantly equals non white immigration to Muslim immigration. That is just embarrassingly wrong. He insinuates, everyone not native from Europe coming to Europe is a Muslim. That is a lie by omission.
He also is guilty of framing, e.g. when he translates the survey question "Gehört der Islam nicht zu Deutschland?" as "Does Islam not belong in Germany"? The actual question means "Does Islam not belong to Germany"?, as in "Should it not play a role in German reality?" and the other means "Does Islam not belong in Germany"?, i.e. "Do you wish Islam would not exist in Germany?"
That is an important difference to an important question and just goes to show he is sloppy as he builds his argument of huge popular opposition to Islam around a wrongly translated question. And of course this is no coincidence. It is used to increase the power of his argument which becomes pretty worthless through this obvious and very relevant mistake.
man you're brilliant, go on
чел ты
Thank you!
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
@@kaiserbauch9092do you think white Europeans will be a minority in their own homelands by 2060
@@thesecondsilvereich7828no, but by 2100 England France Sweden and Belgium might be
Someone work towards building a better future please. Please be against this mass immigration, we need a home for our own people. European nations need to exist as nations, not as a mix of all.
Your governments threw you under the bus. They don't care about the native European. In fact their policies only show that they're anti European.
Nah, you racist bastards need some diversity XD
I think the main issue here is a shift from authenticity to image. People proportion of racist/non-racist is as ever, they just don't want to look racist. People know this does not work, they just don't want to admit it. People want to look progressive and intelligent supporting migration because that is what they are told it means to be sophisticated, even if internally they know this never works. You see in films how they try to avoid putting POCs as the evil characters, for example.
It's called bait. The elites are giving these Asians and Africans a false sense of comfort. TBH they also did it to Western Europeans from the 70's-90's..
Yep, nail on the head with this one! Thank god i stopped giving any shits at 14 about what anyone thinks of me. It was so liberating. People need to embrace this outlook much more
I don't even care at this point, I watched 'diversity' turn my quiet hometown to a crime riddled slum. Invasive species aren't just limited to the animal kingdom
This surely plays a role.
@@Li_ToblerProud autist
This will lead to the most brutal war the world has ever seen...
It won't
@@ecognitio9605 Just wait and witness history in the making
How do you imagine that? Will the Swedes suddenly wake up and start resisting or what? Their state will suddenly begin to pursue policies that are in the interests of the indigenous population?
"This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper."
T. S. Eliot. "The Hollow Men" (1925)
You're being hyperbolic. At worst it's some pogroms. Get real man
“The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life” - is an interesting book to read with regard to the topic in video. There is a part that shows how people become much more “tribal” when they are subconsciously reminded of death.
With current ethnic composition of western Europe in which you can clearly see who is your “tribe”, there is a great danger of all hell breaking loose if bad times arrive. Most probably due to economic reasons at that in which indigenous people start to struggle and “it’s us or them” mentality arises
That’s the plan
Interesting view - makes sense
I am planning to read the book, definitely on my read list!
@@bwolf3489 You believe that our political elites want to bring such a scenario into fruition on purpose?
This can be seen in prisons in countries where diversity is its 'strength' largely people in there will self segregate
I can't watch this without feeling suicidal.
jews are your problems
boohoo go cry 😢😢
@@chroma._.5986🤡
Americans: first time?
I'm glad that you really emphasize that American culture is one of the easiest to assimilate into and that it kind of works to its advantage.
I'm Japanese-American. Born in Japan, but had an American father. I will never be "Japanese" to most Japanese people, but rarely have I ever been denied my status as "American." I wish more minorities in the USA would wake up and realize this. Japan may be an extreme example, but more cultures are like that than they are like the USA.
lol
And now the 13% are trying to get you removed from the status of minority because asian Americans are "stealing" charter school spots from the ghetto tribe
That is because Japanese thinking in the education system teaches them to exclude all those who are different. Their whole life they are trained to keep the different away in a cult-like manner. Any different is considered 'non-japanese', the ultimate insult. Even Japanese who do not conform are excluded.
Yes but that’s what gives america the edge over other countries and why America is on top
America doesn't have a culture. It's just the cultures of White Americans being suppressed by the government in order to make room for replacement populations.
Another factor to consider with mexican migration to the US is that mexicans are being increasingly being classified as "white" because most of them are white(not 100% but mostly)
They usually are Christian, and extremely eager to integrate into the american culture. I had a friend whose parents were mexican immigrants, they spoke broken english with an accent meanwhile their daughter spoke english as her first language(she did speak spanish at home)
Whatever you want to call it, America has been pretty damn good with integration of these immigrants into american society.
Also another point to note is, hispanics are not a radically different culture to american culture while african and middle eastern culture is radically different to that of europe.
I can see america remaining stable while europe facing major instability due to their inability to integrate immigrants
The US has also always had hispanic people in it, esspecially ever since the spanish american war. It's not at all a new migrant group. If anything i think that's the biggest factor. Hispanic people have always, to at least some extent, belonged to the US.
I bet You’re Hispanic.
America isnt really good ,who told you this its one of the countries with the most homeless people and gang crines are really often found?
@@vikuly8Yes Hispanics were under 2% of the population until the post world war 2 period
I live in Texas, the ones coming across the border are not White at all, and many of them aren't even Mexican. Simply being christian doesn't make it easier for you to assimilate, they bring their culture and lifestyle with them. They don't adopt any classical American ways of life at all, and in fact they shame you for not being more like them! There is not any integration at all, and you're lying. AMERICA STABLE? You're delusional.
I love your channel because you just show the facts, you do have your own opinions too but you make sure to distinguish them. These videos you make are good conversation starters.
Thank you!
Hey friends, please take time to listen to my views. i appreciate and respect you all. firstly this video is rassist,disscriminatory, exclusioninist, based and biased... it only inflames racial tensions without building understanding. You are focusing on a few immigrants who arrive by rafts yet Europeans go to Africa, Asia and elsewhere by Jumbo jets and boeings and arrive safely in a few hours. It sometimes is the countrys major economic activity to cater to these Germans and Europeans i.e. European tourism to India, Egypt, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia e.t.c. So you want to visit these countries, eat their best food, vacay in their best beaches, sleep in their best resorts with their most beautiful women.... and then deny them even entry to your own countries? Moreso you are portraying these immigrants as burdens yet what about peope like Lukaku, Mo Salah, Kante, Sadio Mane, Raheem Sterling, Kylian Mbappe, Zidane. You also ignore the historical interraccial interactions i.e. What about the Blacck german patron saint Maurice.. who martyed himself for German people in 200 AD. Is he still considered an immigrant upto today? Moreso Islam revived Europe during the dark ages. What about the diamonds that fill stores in Antwerp and London. Why are you not complaining about chocolate and coffee. Where do they come from?This are a few of the perspectives that you ignore my brother. I respect everyones views, I respect everyones right to political expression and participation, I respect your right to congregate with who you choose. Much love to you all readers. I'm just challenging this biased perspective with facts
@@kaiserbauch9092 Peace be with you in the name of my Lord Jesus Christ. As an african I think Europeans should try to convert the non Christian immigrants to Catholicism like Western Rome did to the German barbarians.
Hi. I live in Sweden.
I think few factors drive the current situation in Sweden:
- The Social Democratic Party has ruled much of the past decades. Its policies are primarily driven by ideology (in this case, solidarity). I.e., not a fact-based consequences' analysis - which is per se adorable in urgent crises. With the result of a massive influx from Middle Eastern conflict zones.
- Swedish politicians cannot discuss these topics without being accused of being racist, being hammered by the media, and losing popularity votes in the next election, thus avoiding the issue.
- The ultra-right-wing nationalistic party (Swedish Democrats) thus gets fuel (now almost the second-largest party) from the people who believe no one listens. They would be utterly unnecessary if politicians had addressed the issues at hand.
Cheers.
Lmao they aren't afraid to be called racist, they just want this to happen. Just look at what names and funding is behind your politics.
That is the problem in a nutshell all over Western civilization. People are generally reasonable, but when your ideology means you refuse to deal with a situation or flat out deny there is a problem, the politics force people to to the right, and further to the right as it becomes apparent that is the only way to try and get any political traction against existing left/liberal/progressive policies that are just digging the hole deeper. I am sure a great many people would prefer a centrist/middle of the road solution, but when BOTH sides dig in and refuse to budge, your options are one side or the other. (or the lesser of two evils)
Calling SD ultra right wing nationalistic is hilarious. They are center-right in reality and absolutely nowhere near the far right parties of most european countries.
they MUST go back
then get some babies and build a family. We, immigrants, have our plans from the moment we arrive in the country. We need a family, having children, saving money...thats the only way we immigrants can achieve a future. Im sure you enjoy your vacations to Mallorca, Italy or Asia. But that doesn't give you a Future. Get proper and educated women, be a Man, and give her a family...that's the only way
No cry about it 😂
@@theemanuella9456 When they get kicked out in millions will you cry then?
@@basedchad6035 it will never happen cry me a river 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
@@theemanuella9456 😂😂😂
The right wing shift is already there blud.
I wonder if western europe will become a compatible source of migrants for eastern europe. I myself migrated to UK from one of the Baltic states, and am now planning to return almost a decade later. The demographic profile of UK isn't the only reason for my decision, nor the main one, but it certainly added to it.
Why should a host country become compatible for migrants. It is the migrants who should adopt.
Eastern Europeans also demonstrate the same kind of mentality as other non-European migrants. Only difference is that Eastern Europeans are Christian and White. Otherwise they are as foreign in western Europe as any other non-European.
@@asmirann3636 I think you misread my comment.
I'm sure from an individual point of view the west of europe might send immigrants to the east. But net migration is almost surely going to continue favoring the west for the foreseeable future.
@@asmirann3636 some type of old ass medieval times style of thinking, you sure your not a time traveler
@@maxi979 You don't need to time travel to realise that eastern Europeans have more in common with Turks/Central Asians/Kavkaz people then they have in common with western Europe.
The arrogance and naivete in Western liberal thinking is truly frightening. In East and Central Africa, we were aware of Europeans, Arabs, and Indians through the coastal trade, our leaders fought against arab slave traders and each other but thought Europeans were harmless. When the scramble for Africa started they were so unprepared and it happened so fast that even the mightiest empires fell in short order. Western leaders are exactly like 19th-century African leaders, and like them, they and their people will be subjugated by foreigners. But unlike Africa, the people will also be replaced, and go the way of Ameridians. I hope the Europeans wake up before it's too late.
As a person from Iraq I can tell you that the issue is very much multilayered and nuanced.
Socioeconomic situations and the meddling of the west into the middle east and greed for oil along with a backward islamic ideology has been the main cause.
You come here you see a very big difference, the people who run things have all the wealth and the majority who would starve for scraps. It is out of financial necessity and prosperity that someone would move to europe.
Adding to that, those who are more open minded middle easterns are facing the worst discrimination by the islamic fundamenlists exactly like what a European feels with these backward islamics so If I was a European I wouldn't be so keen into letting these people in.
Thanks for your sincerity. And I apologize to you for how Europe treated Iraq, abandoning its citizens.
I would like to see a Iraqi Muslima with a non Muslim western husband
@@Psalm51-ql2cnnot possible according to islam the marriage laws are very clear only the man can go for a Christian or jew due to the fact that the children are usually following the fathers religion
But even for men they cant marry atheist women and the ones from other religions cant be
@@Psalm51-ql2cn don't tell the entire world about your weird fantasies...
That's an indication that no woman want you.
@@massimilianomencacci2510yeah your shitty apology will fix everything lol
About the great Germanic invasions late antiquity/early Middle Ages, I’ll focus on my country France, and studies conducted by historians and demographers showed that these newcomers (invaders and settlers) did not change drastically the ethnic composition of modern day France. In fact our demographic structure overall remained roughly the same from antiquity to the XXth century with some regional variations especially in border regions
because the native celt populations kept breeding, unlike today
From what I understand, the Roman conquest involved great depopulation followed by a demographic boom and the emergence of the Gallo-Roman, the Latinized Celts, the Germanic invasions on the other hand changed the profile of the elites, the aristocracy tended to be more ethnically Germanic, The great phenomenon in France was Paris's centralizing efforts to erode regional identities, a more cultural process with a linguistic focus.
However, there are some exceptions, in the works of Alexis de Tocqueville, he speaks of how Normandy gave a foreign impression, with the region closer to England and Protestant Germanic Europe in certain socio-cultural aspects and political culture; I also saw certain reports from the occupying German forces during ww2 reporting this fact.
Was the presence of Norse Scandinavian settlers more than a millennium ago echoing for centuries?
Because those peoples shared a common ancestor from maybe 500 years ago max. We are now interbreeding with peoples with a common ancestor from 200000-50000 years ago
I read something very disturbing but interesting. France had high levels of immigration since the late 19th century,much sooner than other European countries. And dont forget France had low birth rates much sooner than other countries. Ethnic French people likely make up only half of the population if not less. The other half being mostly Southern European and North African in origin.
There signifcantly more migrants in france today than in early medieval era with the migration of franks and others, also, the fertility rates of migrants in france is way bigger than the below replacement natives fertility, doesnt need a rocket scientist to understand the things are way different now.
Its not racist to love your country and culture and not want to see it destroyed. Anyone who says otherwise is the true racist because they only wish the death of your culture and want you to be more like them. Europe is one of the least racist parts of the world but we also have an identity too. If you live in a foreign country your culture should not take priority over your host countries. How is even saying that in anyway controversial we shouldn't have to change who we are to accommodate people who wont even change to accommodate us. Likewise I wouldn't go to china and expect them to become more european, same japan or uganda or any other country.
I mean your nations did for around 600 years, Karma is finaly catching up to your nations, and I am happpy. You know in London, in my Local area, I see more Non Brits then British natives, and I am happy with that, I wish for a Islamic Europe (Slowly becoming a reality) So I am happy, but good thing is that, in general Most Europeans today are all talk,
@@itsve8632 You talk of Karma but I would be curious to know what country you trace your origins to and if they have a history of conquest and genocide. If so then talking of Karma is pure hypocrisy. Islamic nations and empires have done things that you condemn the west for and then some.
@@DrEzekielthing is, I dont beleive in Karma, I simply said it as a bit of a joke, but its still true, Even the worst of the worst Islamic nations have done, Britian has done Worse at a FAR larger scale, then any Islamic nation.
@@itsve8632 Many Islamic conquerors have brutalised the conquered way worse the the British ever did. Arab slavers castrated black slaves and slavery still goes on to this day. To say Britain was worse is just a bare faced lie. You clearly have an anti British/pro Islam bias which means that something minor the British did wrong is worse than something major an Islamic regime does wrong.
@@DrEzekiel Nope, As I said Britian did it as a FAR LARGER scale. And you don't think they castrated slaves?
I can see you lie and have a anti Islamic bias,
The brits did more worse and generally more people, its clear you try to minimise the British guilt. 90% of problems in the Arab world are British and colonial made. If the brits stuck by their word and gave all of arabia to hejaz and the Arabs. There would be peace.
35:00 minutes of the video: I live in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. The population of the city is 47% European descent but many of the people of European descent are new emigrants and still carry on with their language and culture in everyday life. On my daily walks downtown you hear people talking dozens of foreign languages and I even hear French more than English some days. While I was a student and still today, each ethnic group sit together in the classroom and at the lunch tables regardless if they have an English name or not. I'm not saying there isn't integration of people having coffee etc but in general people hangout with their own ethnic descent even 2nd and 3rd generations. Every part of Greater Vancouver has ethnic enclaves. As far as white flight there are many different reasons. My grandparents retired and moved out of the city for a more rural lifestyle and to supplement their retirement with cheaper real estate. Not long after we wanted to be close to them so we moved too. I feel white people are being blamed for everything as now with young professionals moving back into the inner-city we're being blamed for gentrification. White people seem to be damned if they do and damned if they don't. Indian's vote nearly 100% for an Indian politician not for their policies but because he/she is also Indian. Unfortuniatly, as politics in India they have been corrupt.
if your description of indians being tribal and voting their person happens in every other group and also stays in next 20-30 years(in US it doesnt seem to be that straightforward), canada is in trouble like sudan,ethiopia and many others. In ethiopia problem was described to be exactly this, people fear their rights are pushed down when other group is in power and other group can stay in power exactly coz population is bigger and thus guarantees votes with tribal voting "system".
Make French the only official language and all of them will assimilate in two generations.
Do you know the phrase Divide And Conquer? It's sometimes also translated Divide And Rule. It comes from Latin, _Divíde et impera._ Now perhaps you understand better why the elites love immigration. It's not _just_ about economics, though that's a large part of it. Especially for politicians, it's also about how to better marginalize certain demographics so they become easier to rule.
Btw. this is the same tactic the House of Habsburg used in Hungary when they gained control of the country. The first thing they did, was to try to marginalize the ruling Magyar population of Hungary (meaning the natives of Hungary). They did this by opening up for unchecked immigration by Slavic peoples into Hungary. Thankfully, it didn't work out entirely as they planned, however, because the Magyars got along just fine with the Slavs.
@@urlauburlaub2222 Why are you trying to redefine the meaning of Divide and Conquer?
Magyarization was in the 1800's. Meanwhile House Habsburg gained control as early as the 1400's.
As you well know, Divide and Conquer is a general term for sowing discord to gain power. _One_ of the ways of doing that, is the technique of inviting a third party for dinner, such as when the Habsburgs invited competing ethnicities into Hungary in order to marginalize the Magyar nobility.
Either way, it's just an example; a parable to make you learn and see patterns where you didn't before, so you can use it to better understand the current situation.
What I'm trying to explain here, is that this way of Divide and Conquer isn't new. In fact, we're seeing it right now, and _that's_ the reason for why we have mass unwanted immigration into formerly ethnically homogenic nations in Europe.
The political reason for doing it, is in order to marginalize the current native populations and nations. The reason is obviously outside pressure from institutions like the EU and UN.
Meanwhile the economic reason is also obvious: Because it puts pressure on the labour market to ensure lower wages, while at the same time putting pressure on the real estate market to ensure higher housing prices for the owners.
Cui bono: Each time there is one special demography that seems to benefit: The top elite, because they can sell or rent out their houses for _higher prices,_ and because they can get work done in their factories or service ships for _lower prices._
The "white flight" in my country has become impossible. As muslims are now in every little village or town, no matter where you go. And the growth rate on average is a doubling every 7 years.
Thats how the natives felt about white people
@@greenearth9945 The Natives who were constantly genociding each other in never-ending turf wars? Just think of the Europeans as another tribe across a giant lake that won against all the other tribes and created peace. We're all the same, after all.
At least the natives fought back to the bitter end. Europeans are pretty much spineless.
They recently DNA connected a British man to a skeleton found in Britons 13,000 years ago
Which country?
You know look up Enoch Powell’s speeches on immigration 60-80s, this video is like a sociological-historical extension of almost everything he said except for still a prediction of big internal conflicts and violence.
There have been no "rivers of blood" though. Powell should have just said that there will be parallel societies according to phenotype or ethnicity in the future.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 very true, he was broadly basing the prediction on the Indian-Pakistani conflicts post independence. However, it is still unclear whether it’s modern values or far greater food security and development overall which achieves greater peace despite high immigration. Perhaps both are related
@@batmanbad5091 well yes but, in this logic England in the 1600s (which was 100% monoethnic)was more brutal than it is now, so, what is really the point?
Are the violent events that you have in mind the product of conflict because of biological phenotype?
Or are they because of other motives, such as religious extremism?
@@tomorrowneverdies567 Don't be so sure. Britain might have a Balkanization or Lebanesation.
@@tomorrowneverdies567 Yeah rape gangs aren't a problem...
Civic nationalism is (soft) globalism.
it's called genocide
The thing is that even if Sweden becomes 25% Swedish Swedes will still be the upper class but the lower class will be totally different how does that play out
Violence. Historically atleast.
A racial caste system, like the Hutus and the Tutsis
They’ll come for the 25%.
36:36 The most common foreign nationalities in prison statistic should be distinguished from ethnicity. A majority of Bulgarians or Romanians in western prisons are in fact Gypsies with Bulgarian or Romanian passports.
As a Romanian nothing irks me more than seeing gypsies reffered to as Romanians
In France 70% of prisoners are Muslims in jail !
I went to paris last year, thought i was taking a holiday to any country in sub-Saharan africa.
Stop European genocide 2023❤
how is genocide if no one is being killed? it's a demographic shift that can be stopped if Europeans actually started having babies, but they won't because they don't want to afford it
I'm a third generation muslim immigrant in France who has also worked a bit as an engineer in the US, Ireland and Switzerland, and your analysis is honestly spot on.
Save for a fact that I personally think is worth mentioning: Muslim immigrants will justify a lot of their personal or cultural beliefs with religion, but more often than not, there is nothing in the religion that actually backs up what they think.
As a muslim you are actually encouraged to either abide by the rule of the king of the country you live in (that you obviously interpret as the democratically elected government nowadays) or leave, yet Muslims in Europe will find all kinds of loopholes in the religion to justify their behavior.
You are obligated to keep good relationship with your neighbors and NURTURE that relationship (i.e. interact with them in a positive manner and frequently enough) yet Muslims in Europe are completely shut off from the rest of the community and usually just develop their own micro-biome that eventually become ghettos in big city suburbs, and, as the Quran verse says very clearly, you should not enforce your religion upon others, yet look at terrorism.
The reality here is that most of the issues come from the fact that they come from countries that are completely backwards ideologically and have failed to keep up with the advancements of the rest of the world, their societies are hyper patriarchal and authoritarian, in which women have been trained to be submissive and to be proud of it, and men can do whatever the hell they want, which more often than not transgresses the religious principles they claim to abide by.
I personally deplore the state of my diaspora, there are many of us who try to make things better, but recently the majority started migrating to Asian and American countries, me included, because the quality of Muslim communities there is just incomparable to our disastrous situation here.
I can very much feel that I will soon be unwanted by the country I was born in, and I do not feel any remnant of connexion with the muslim diaspora anymore, I gave up completely.
Ever since I worked in the US, I got to meet Muslims there, and many of them share a similar background as me. Muslims In America are high achiever, have high income families and are more educated than the average American, I don't see why I would want to go back to Europe. This continent will implode by the next century.
I wondered where the negative stereotypes about Muslims in Europe came from. I don't live in Europe and have never been there so I don't want to dismiss their issues. I am an American and all the Muslims I know over here are good people who work hard, sure there are some cultural differences but they seem sensible once they are explained.
@@alastairthegreat2887 from people getting stabbed, robbed, kidnapped, raped, etc. Read some european news, especially from sweden and UK.
@@Awethon I looked at some of the European news and there is a big difference between the Muslims I have met in the US compared to the European ones.
The ones here tend to be married and have a family instead of being single military age men.
@@alastairthegreat2887because unlike Europe Muslim immigration to America is controlled and legal because there is no borders between Muslim world and America which makes integration much easier
@@dragonfire3727 Have European countries considered installing gun turrets along water ways?
You have to consider that a large part of problematic Romanian citizens in Western Europe are of Roma ethnicity
I have noticed that the USA never had this extreme problem with tensions between religions like Europe has.
In the USA there is about 45 million Catholics, 7.5 million Jewish people, 3.4 million Muslims, 65 million non-religious and the rest is other or Protestant. So we are a very religiously diverse country already, over 120 million Americans are not Protestant.
@@beasley1232Historically it has as Catholics were often heavily persecuted among your daily American society in say, 1874.
@@PeruvianPotato not to any of the extremes that Europe had tho is my point.
The USA is the most religiously diverse country in the world, only 33% of Americans identified as Protestant as of 2024. Another 24% of Americans identified as Catholic, 22% as irreligious/Agnostic/Atheist, 4% Jewish, 2% Muslim, 1% Buddhist and 1% Hindu etc.
Like Rishi Sunak😂
This video is doing great so far. Thank you all for watching and for your kind words of praise! I will try to work on the pronunciation and intonation!
But I need to address certain issues appearing in the comment section since some of the comments are really unhinged. I won't delete any comments, but I want to clarify that I denounce and disagree with the following:
Giving too much weight to research regarding IQ and race since it leads to very ugly rabbit holes and is just an evil way to evaluate people. If IQ is so important, why wouldn't you measure the IQ of the population of your country and expel the low-IQ people?
Anti-semitism and the notion that the "Jews" are behind everything. Even if I ignore that it is foolish to think that they would wield the power to influence world affairs in such a matter, why would they do it? How does, for example, the state of Israel benefit from the pro-Palestine stance of Europe? How is it in the interest of Jews to increase anti-semitism in France so that the Jews emigrate to Israel? Jews are not a monolith. Sure, some Jewish people promote globalist secularist liberal values, but there also are conservative nationalist Jews and everything in between.
Obviously, and I am somewhat surprised I even have to write it, any manifestations of neonazism. If Hitler had won, as some people in the comments suggest, my people and many other Central and Eastern European peoples I hold dear would not be here. Eastern European Neonazi is an oxymoron; I am an Untermensch according to Nazis.
Any calls to violence.
As for the Great Replacement Theory, I already spoke about it in the video about the Great Demographic Implosion (part II). While it is just a mathematical fact that in certain countries, for example Germany, every year the number of people that dies, mostly ethnic natives, are balanced off by immigrants so the population and the workforce do not decline, I sincerely do believe that it is not some grand conspiracy by the elites or "the Jews" or whatever. It is a combination of, in my opinion, not well-thought-out policies, conformism, and lack of political courage. But the world is not a place that can be governed in the way people believe conspiracy theories think it can be managed. It is mostly chaos, an intersection of hundreds of interests, events, and incidents. Assuming that it is all run by some nefarious elites in the background gives us a certain sense of peace by believing that it is all governed by someone. It is not. The truly scary reality is that nobody runs anything; it is a train without an engine driver.
I think IQ is very interesting. First of all, it would mean East Asian and Jewish peoples would take over the earth. And then everybody else would be expelled from their countries xD
To address your question: "How is it in the interest of Jews to increase anti-semitism in France so that the Jews emigrate to Israel?"
While it isn't the case for all Jews, a minority of them, such as Ingrid Lomfors and Barbara Spectre - both from the same parish, btw - are in agreement that making Europe a worse place for Jews is fulfilling the prophecies of the Torah, whereupon all Jews will return home to the Promised Land.
This is ofc cringe religious superstition, but now you know why this minority of Jews work for a Europe that is actually worse for European Jews. Not all Jews like this idea, however, and many want to be able to live on in Europe without risking life and limb on every corner store.
Just as an example, my friend wore a shirt with a band logo reminiscent of the Star of David to the local store in Oslo. Then some obviously Middle Eastern guy just calmly said to him, "I hate Jews!"
Baffled we asked him why, and then my friend got into an argument with him - which we quickly ended, because more people were massing in. It simply wasn't safe having that sort of conversation, in our own native country.
europe donot want your black heads too ,,,and not your black heads hindu cousins ,,,you should know that
You already pointed out why the lower class feels replaced in your video. And that what drives this replacement is a systemetical political disfranchisement of this class through political means like cordon sanitaire's around "populistic parties". And that this replacement is driven by an leftist educated academic elite who do not bare the burdens in their rich homogeneous neighborhoods is something you also mentioned.
By the way dutch statistics are skewed since 3rd generation non western immigrants( who feel more alienated then the generations before) are counted as native dutch.
Shit take on the Jews. But I'm sure I'm gonna get shadowbanned for saying this.
The idea that you can force peoples of different races and ethnicities to form a nation state goes against the most fundamental characteristics of the human species, it is literally the reason why nation states formed in the first place. One‘s race and ethnicity are integral parts of one‘s identity and cannot be removed or adjusted through 'integration'. And humans prefer to live with, be surrounded by and interact with other humans of the same race, people that look like them. This is well understood. Much in the way Eagles don‘t hang out with pigeons or other birds. All this is rooted in Marxist ideology where one can simply erase human biology, completely disregard human nature and simply mold, reconfigure and reshape human beings to one‘s liking.
The whole thing spells disaster and that‘s exactly what we‘re seeing happen in France and other places today. It will eventually results in a reversion to a time on Earth when there were hundreds and thousands of microstates, tribes and clans etc; definitely not the neo-Marxist 'workers of the world, unite' (which they did not) vision of a 'global community' composed of 'global citizens' or whatever.
Europe must remain Europe.
Your post stands head and shoulders over the vast majority of these posts due to its coherence, logic, and common sense. This drive to create countries with wide disparities between races, cultures and religions, is an artifice of the highest order. They are trying to achieve harmonious societies with individuals, families, and the larger public, who do not only not resemble each other, but do not share the same beliefs, culture, or values. All held together by the thin mesh of of democratic governance. The West is destroying ethnicities and cultures by emphasizing diversity and inclusion, and open borders. They are hell bent on eradicating the indigenous people of Europe and European descent. This is being aided by the fact that Europeans and those of European descent, are either having fewer children, or no children at all. In short, whites are contracepting themselves out if existence. Hence the looming shadow of replacement. I agree, that Europe must remain Europe. No one is asking, nor suggesting to China, that it should import mass numbers of people who are not Han Chinese, so the country can be more, "diverse."
ok mr.evolutionary psychologist and anthropologist
the problem with your analogy is that Eagles and Pigeons are different species. Africans, Europeans and Asians are of the same species we just look different because we adapt to different climates biologically. a pigeon and an eagle can not procreate, but an Asian (human) and Latino (human) can.
Your comment made me think. Tbf, if microstates were the result of forced mass immigration, wouldn't that be exactly the result desired as a globalist or some form of power state? You can easily dominate/conquer small microstates (tribes). I do feel there has been a strong push lately for some form of United States of Europe from Brussel. In order to accomplish this you must destroy the strong tribal ethicities in European countries. Only then can you promise unification under something "better". In my estimates Mass Immigration is a great way to destroy/destabilize a centralized culture in a country.
@@Nickel_EyeStupid take, completely different cultures and traditions, so different that they can't coexist, and shouldn't.
The idea that Latino migrants to the U.S. assimilate easily and have no significant longterm negative impact on the U.S. is absurd. I can't imagine you being a resident of the U.S. to say such a thing.
How?
It's simply objectively true, the children of Latino immigrants speak English and adopt wider American culture.
@@Retotion And even become Oakland Raiders fans. 🤣
Every person in Europe should be required to watch this video.
Sad. If I travel to a country I wish to experience their culture and customs not a culture foreign to that country.
Wow. Very good documentary especially the one about the USA. I’m black American and so many Latinos are coming to my community you have to admire how hard they work. Many have poor English speaking skills, but they hustle to work. I’d be interested in seeing how Europe looks demographic wise in 10 years.
German youth is already majority Turk, apparently.
The UK will be Europes 1st caliphate.
@@user-rg9xd9mu5rare you joking? 🎉
Third world immigration on any nation for 60 years won’t end well though…
blacks should get that latino mentality
You missed the key aspect. Immigrants to social democratic countries usually are less enterpreneurial and more often don't work and excessively use free services provided by the welfare state. But immigrants to more free market oriented countries usually are more enterprenerial, work and accomodate to local conditions. So it's about different economic model. Economic model of Europe doesn't favor social mobility.
Fucking excellent video! I just want to say THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. It does give me tons of hope to start seeing people analyzing the narrative that we have been fed for years
Thank you!
One thing is often forgotten when talked of europe: lot of wars had aspect of this ethnic,cultural division(be it language, religious differences, cultural differences even smaller ones), thus post WW2 was peaceful due to smart deals to keep this in mind (in africa this is often mentioned as big factor behind wars, but not in europe, which to me shows big hubris and ignorance of our history).
I am glad to hear that!
I’m Eastern European immigrant in London and I agree. Although I am the contributor financially I do see massive culture clash and honestly the want to meet more people from my culture. However, many educated and enterprenual Eastern Europeans come here for 10years max and leave back home due to cultural differences. West Europe is temporarily state until we have funds and ideas to make it in our countries.
„Im just here for the money” was all i told my mom via phone when was working in the netherland
Yes, that may maybe true for Eastern Europeans. But there is no way that Africans will work for a couple of years in a European country and then choose to voluntarily go back. It would be extremely rare.
@@taireport I think this has to be considered in immigration laws, which made EU good idea as the economies although different people still go back or if don’t the culture clash is less than non-eu countries. Controversial opinion I think we should discriminate based on trends and culture because it definitely will affect the country.
It's funny that the reverse has begun to happen as well. Eastern Europeans move to London for larger salaries to save up and go home. Meanwhile some Westerners like myself who work primarily online move to Eastern Europe for the lower cost of living.
@@codyvandal2860 Do you experience culture clash tho? I struggle in the west I wonder how westerners feel in the east
American here. Just want to point out that the crack thing was originally supported by leaders in the black community, as they wanted the issue cracked down on and addressed, not expecting it to be the drawn out slog that it became. It wasn't (entirely) a product of institutional racism, but also of the paternalism of the federal government and the faith placed in it at the time. The effects certainly led to an imbalanced outcome though.
Not exactly. We wanted jobs, rehab, and better policing. The dems heard more policing and stricter laws. Black Americans never get exactly what we ask for from these parties.
That random picture of two middle class intellectuals at 30:18 and the likening of population aging denial to cosmetic surgery at 34:36 are moments I laughed at.
Well researched channel, not afraid to tackle sensitive topics and not bigoted or hateful in any way. Rarely see such well balanced videos on these matters.
You can be bigoted to lies and mistruths, thus being bigoted isn't bad. There isn't anything to laugh at in this video.
This is a serious topic that has profound impact to nations. I myself is an immigrant and an ethnic minority in the host country, although I'm not quite settled down yet and may move to another country/back to my home country on any day. I see it quite bizarre how certain European countries resort to mass migration as the single method to resolve their demographic problem without considering potential long-term impacts. What's worse in most platforms this topic is considered racist and therefore banned from public debates. It is not going to end well for either the native Europeans nor the immigrates as in some countries ethnic groups are bound to end up in riots and conflicts in the near future. Europe is already lagging behind North America and East Asia in technology advancement which will cause major economic and social problems, if ethnic clashes become the norm Europe will for sure turn into 3rd world.
By stealing the fruits of their labour through financial and currency con games,
central banks have turned the working class
into the working poor in many of these European countries.
This has resulted in no family formation and no children.
Birth rates have thus crashed and the young people see no future.
The solution is simple.
Get rid of central banking thieves and watch demographics reverse course.
Europe is by no means lagging jn technology. Not sure what technologies you had in mind but Europe generally remains on cutting edge. By Europe I mean Germany. 😂
Germany is not the EU. There are many countries in the EU, and Germany is actually lagging behind in digital advancement since it's always been hyper-focused on heavy industry, so you are not well informed.@@user-rg9xd9mu5r
Look into the World Economic Forum their interested is worth more then that of the people
It was always supposed too. We are just experiencing what the "allies" in WW2 fought for.
This was such an insightful video. I am mixed european (dutch) and these issues and topics require so much nuance. When having conversations about this people often reduce the topic to short-sighted and uninformed comments. Big up to Kaiser for explaining not only that these issues with migration exist, but also the how and why. Getting a clear picture as to why these immigrations are happening and why they are failing to integrate on a large population scale is so enlightening.
In the Netherlands its hard to have these conversations. Immigrants (or their kids) often feel unwelcome in the countries they live in, mostly due to economic and cultural segregation instigated by their hosts (Kaiser explained this in the video). As someone with a unique perspective into both foreign and native ethnicities I notice that Dutch people can easily figure out migration is a "problem" but find it hard to identify or admit the main causes behind the failed integration, something the natives also have a very big hand in. Netherlands was eager to import these people when they could make money off their backs, but preferably wanted to cast them out after the money was made and the labour was done. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
Even I, as someone who has lived in The Netherlands my whole live, speak the native language and know dutch history thoroughly (No offense, but often in much more detail than my homogenous ethnical dutch countrymen) and I still get strange looks in more rural villages and sometimes still have to deal with racism and fear (probably stemming from that heavy tribal mentality that Kaiser explained) of my skin color from my fellow dutch people. This is not the norm however, and I have these encounters usually with more elderly people. But it still occurs.
As someone who was raised in one of such ghettos described in Amsterdam, and later lived the dutch village life in a more rural village, I've seen both sides. I agree, integration of immigrant groups has had some serious struggles here and both ethnic groups (native dutch) and (immigrants) have an "Us vs them" mentality (not all but its definitely there). I sometimes feel that dutch people, possibly due to the tribal history, but definitely also due to an imperial/colonial cultural superiority complex have a high cultural insensitivity. Many find it hard to be respectful or mindful of foreign cultures, causing further rifts between immigrant and native communties. You can see this in dutch travel behavior when they're on holiday too. Dutch people can be very rude and culturally unaware when visiting other countries because they don't want to adapt.
Excuses. Nobody complains about Korean and Vietnamese immigrants. If immigrants can't integrate in western fucking Europe it's all on them not wanting to. So much I'd done for them. It's extremely infuriating to hear immigrants complaining about them not being "accepted " when the immigration has been the reason a lot of very nice places has been reduced to dumps by the newly imported cultures.
respectful and mindful could be solved by simply being scientific, i also hate that some Dutch ppl try to be nice in Bali too, just absurd, like cringe sometimes when they are being overly dramatic about the Hinduism thingy.
None of what you said matters. You are not owed respect in any way. They are not your "fellow Dutch", you are mixed, not Dutch, and you hold anti-Dutch ideology.
You SHOULD get looks, you should get disrespect.
@@Tigo625 Ok mafkees. Als jij denkt dat je een monopolie op de nederlandse cultuur hebt heb je het mis vriend.
@@prophetscott I have no such thing, I am not Dutch, the Dutch have that monopoly. The natives.
I am from Germany and may God bless you for your virtue my brother. You deserve laurels and wine for your work!
Most Latinos join the military because that's the best economic pathway for them.
To think that the irish and italians integrated succesfully into the american culture is a wild statement. They work, and have dencent standards of living, is that what integration means in America?
What is successful integration if not working, intermarrying, partaking the culture, language and so on? Transmutation ?
Looking at marriage outside of your group is one way at looking at assimilation. Whether people like it or not, Hispanics have a large degree of interracial marriage.
modernity cares more about material progress than spiritual one , that is why the modern west is decadent
@@QuartBernstein311 Asians have a high degree of interracial mariage too lmao
Yes. Literally I don’t see any Polish Italian or German Americans still speaking there native languages. Nor do you see them still practicing stuff from there culture ide say the only thing left would the the cuisine.
Yes, and it's probably the most unpopular political decision ever. It is in no way supported by the European peoples.
you get what you tolerate
@@spesamissaest1312 in my experience it isn't well received or tolerated by the average european. but it's difficult if not impossible to change when all established parties support it, and when the media stands ready to hound down everyone who disagrees with it, and label them as "racists"..
@@mortenovergaard7397 what have we done? Has there been massive protests? has there been violent riots? has there been political voting to change out the parties? Has there been anything done m8. No nothing we tolerate this and get exactly what we deserve.
@@spesamissaest1312 i'm not sure what you tolerate. personally i've always voted against this, and i've warned people around me about it. but man it's difficult when the media either ignores or twist facts to the 95% of people who don't follow politics.. the nationalist party actually did get 22% of the vote at some point, but then they cucked out and did basically nothing.. thanks a lot for that. the political class are just incompetent.. weak.. useless on this matter. they are very good at fighting a low unemployment rate and so on, but they refuse to do the right thing here. riots and so on won't change much. look at the trucker protest in canada and january 6th in the US. the politicians will keep doing what they're doing so far.
Western Europe is totaly lost..... Im so glad that Czech Poland and others central europe countries have migration majority from Eastern europe.
With similar values and culture.
Extremely common eastern European W, but keep yourself safe, and never allow mass migration
eastern europe has very low birthrates , the only difference is that they dont import foreign workers.
they dont have real wealth as they are more dependant on the west.
you are not seeing the real bigger problem which is pushing humanity to its demise .
remind me to come back in 20 years when everything is still doing fine
I don't know about that. Poland is getting more enriched by the day. In 2 years Warsaw will look like Paris. Sad
@@mariusstancu1957 poverty good?
A key factor is also that Latin American countries are migrant countries themselves, so, descendents of migrants, migrating again to a familiar culture is not hard. Also the natives have mixed with Europeans and Africans for 500 years (mostly with Europeans) and some of the countries have sizable Asian migrant communities as well.
They are as good or better at assimilating migrants than the USA.
Mexico, Brazil and Colombia literally made strong cultural identities, cuisines and traditions out of race mixing
@@TheJosman All of them did.
We have our own culture. The culture of Latinos in the US may be familiar to you but it does not represent real Americans.
It can be reversed. By deportation
Or better a massive scale expulsion
Ich kenne alleine in meinem Umfeld so viele Deutsche die sich mit anderen "Ethnien" gemischt haben, alleine diese würden auf die Barrikaden gehen und starke Unruhen auftreten. Die Amerikaner(Mit einer bestimmen Religionsgruppe) haben euch nachdem WW2 politisch und kulturell zerstört. Das alles ist kein Zufall.
@@cazwalt9013that’s the same lowk
Mass deportation will not work it will lead to massive and violent revolts not only by the immigrants but also by some on the left.
You might be able to cut further immigration by cutting the social benefits for immigrants and and give a motivation to leave by giving financial incentive to leave plus absolute denial of re-entrance after.
but the problem is to stay
@@frankfalkenburry5373 keep dreaming 🤣🤡
This video is absolutely spot on what I’ve been theorizing for myself. Excellent work man. 👌
It's unfair to just categorize "European" and "non European", there are huge differences between sub-Saharan African, Middleastern, east Asian, south Asian and Latin American in almost every way, from education, culture, behaviour, wealth level, crime levels, productivity to ability and willingness to integrate with other ethnicities
Well, those who make 99% problems in Europe are middle eastern and african muslims, so don't pretend you don't know who is meant by these "non-europeans".
Yes I think the video is quite flawed in several ways but still touches on some very interesting points. In fairness, the poster was limited by the way in which statistics are collected in the case studies/countries. He admits that Indian Hindus are typically well off in Britain and Pakistani Muslims tend to not integrate as well as other immigrants. I for one think this has less to do with culture and more so with class. The muslim lawyer from Islamabad, Pakistan will be a more productive and better integrated immigrant than a hindu social worker without university education from rural India.
In short, the demographic "crisis" in Europe may be driven by "undesirable" immigrants. But they are not undesirable because of their skin colour or religion. They are undesirable because of their social standing in their respective countries (this indirectly ties in with the Islamic fundementalism discussed in the video - as the partiarchical and fundementalist tendencies are not as prevelant in the upper middle classes). Europe will need immigration in the long run to make up for its ageing/declining population. But the immigrants ought to be economically productive and willing to integrate. The best way to do this is to import the urban, educated, elite from the Global South. If America can bring in hundred of thousands of highly skilled Indian and Chinese tech professionals, I do not see why Britiain or Germany can't do the same. There is no shortage of them and oppurtunity in Europe remains higher than in India and China currently.
Eurøpean birthrate per female is 1.5
Afrìcan birthdate per female is over 5 (some places over 6)
So as mass migratiøn continues, birthrate plus mass migratiøn has one obvious outcome. That’s not racìsm, that’s just basic math.
@@Xzazashake Where are you getting your information? What you said was true historically from Europeans that were farmers and other people that were farmers (generally in the past).However, the people coming aren’t farmers and this isn’t about labor. Birthrates aren’t just high in Afríca because it’s calculated and about security in old age. They are high because of the culture itself, and a pleasure vs lack of consequences attitude about s3x. Yes, North Africa has been a primary place people are coming from. The thing is Sub-Saharan Afríca has also brought over a lot of people… and if this recent wave is any indication looks like that will now be the primary source of mígrants.
@@Xzazashake I asked where you got the information because I was interested in reading it, do you have the name of the study? I’ve had these debates before and when someone else said something similar to me the study they mentioned was from over a decade ago. So it wasn’t up-to-date and that isn’t even considering if the source was objective
I’ve already explained the difference in why birthrates were high in the past in Europe and the difference between that and African birthrates today. In Sub-Saharan Africa the major factors driving high birthrates in these countries include low contraceptive use, high adolescent fertility rates and a prevalence of polygamous marriages (and sadly in some places also due to very high rap3 rates, like Líberia for example where the estimate is 70%to 80% of wømen have been rap3d. Supposedly this trend in Libería has reversed but if I was female I still wouldn’t go there).
When you say they are going down, that data is recently and only small percentage overall. However, the rates in comparison to much of the rest of the world are very high. Also, like I said, we aren’t seeing families coming into most of Europe, it’s over 90% military aged males.
My country is going to sh*t. I am Dutch and more than 50% of the population in my city (The Hague) is an immigrant. Everyone is so afraid of being called a racist, so many people don’t speak out. But the truth is we are rapidly losing our culture, values and connection with each other. Integration of immigrants has been massively unsuccessful, where many immigrants group up together in schools and in neighbourhoods. Many people don’t even speak Dutch anymore. Western values which originated from the enlightenment are also being threatened by a dogmatic religion which doesn’t tolerate any form of criticism, and has actually led to terrorism already. Then there’s also the fact that statistically immigrants are proportionately responsible for much more criminal behaviour than those of Dutch origin. We should stand strong and not be afraid to be proud of our nation and culture 🇳🇱🌷❤.
(Also just to be sure, I have nothing against individual people or immigrants, I have many friends like them, some who even agree, I just don’t think mass immigration of groups who don’t properly integrate into our society will be beneficial and lead to happier living)
Sources please?
@@Plabastie I gave the sources but my comment is censored, probably because too many links
It's called Karma.
You Europeans f***ed around too much around the world.
@@Laceh1so you turn around saying you don't have anything against garbage immigrants?......what a coward you are......
“The grass will always be greener” in Europe than in the Middel East, Asia or Africa. Migration to Europe has been taken place for millennia and it will never stop unless there will be a entirely different climate (a devastating effect of global warming ?) It’s as natural as it gets when you consider that people by nature are always trying to adapt themselves to a situation where life is better and chance of survival is higher. In fact human evolution is driven by migration, we are a species that can adapt because of our brain.
An absolutely tragic failure. There is no recovering from this. The same suicidal logic is being applied here in Canada as well. Our 'great' leader wants to pump in 500K immigrants per annum. There will be blood by the end of it.
at least you are not importing mostly conservative muslims, and muslims never integrate they conquer, or are repelled. It will get much worse before it gets better.
Which is why I've given up on the West and am now openly rooting for the East.
@@jarekkish5515 what do you mean with "the east", its not like its one culturally similar entity like the west, just look at china and india.
@@captainalex157 I'm referring to China.
Wow. The US is a million a year which is horrible considering all the illegals we get. Canada has 10 times smaller a population and half the immigration 😬 good luck
You presented both sides in a fair way despite any personal biases. Excellent job as always! I'm glad your channel is taking off judging by all the comments. You deserve it!
Thank you!
I know most people hate Communism. But in my option it was kind of a blessing in disguise for Eastern Europe. The Communist system is the biggest reason eastern Europe is still more underdeveloped and traditional compared to western Europe,resulting in low levels of immigration there. One just needs to look at the differences between West and East Germany. East Germans are much more conserative and wary of strangers.
I also heard something very disturbing but interesting. France had high levels of immigration since the late 19th century,much sooner than other European countries. And dont forget France had low birth rates much sooner than other countries. Ethnic French people likely make up only half of the population if not less. The other half being Southern European and North African in origin.
Eastern Europe didnt have colonies ,the Moment you have an empire you have to accept minorities and other cultures
Well, there might have been some collateral unwanted benefits. But to say it was a blessing? No way.
@@kaiserbauch9092 every empire in history had this transition the Golden era of the Roman Empire was when they were able to connect the whole meditteranean
Eastern Europe has always been less developed. Always been conquered by powerful adversaries from huns to mongols to ottomans to Russians. The racial theorist of the 19th century didn’t even consider white Eastern European as culturally and socially the same level. The Nazis considered them sub human
As a East European living in the UK I am quite gobsmacked by naivety and political correctness of many Brits about the issue and overwhelming facts about negative impact of non-European immigration.
A lot of British people don’t like poles
@@kk-gc1ii yes mate...true
I noticed / experienced it few times.
@@zbiku82 in Europe I think there is less of a white identity unlike America. Even poles don’t like Ukrainians in there country
Most Poles I met were ok but they did bring crime also but the suppression of wages was the killer as they could live 14 to a house sharing bills where as a British family would be living as a family . They could not compete and wages fell at a time traditionally when Labour was a shortage employers would have been forced to pay more to attract labour. £100 billion left the country sent back to Poland on top of the billions we gave to the eu and poles who mostly worked minimum wage jobs could claim welfare so taking all this into consideration it cost us dearly . As for none white immigrants we don’t want them , never have which every poll has shown but they ignore us and all parties are are pro immigration.
You're no different to Muslim immigrants, go back to Poland
It's a mistake to attribute the open door policies of the last 50 years to any particular political position. These policies have had bipartisan support from parties across the political spectrum. While many on the Left may engage in apologetics for these policies they are not who is driving them. As always it is big business that decides the direction a nation takes, and mass immigration is no exception. While the demographic arguments for immigration have merit (low birth rates are a big problem), it is economic considerations at the heart of it. Since the West started hollowing out their economies by offshoring everything they could get away with (and particularly decimating manufacturing) the economies there have been undergoing structural deflation and negative growth. Mass immigration is used to offset and hide this, as quickly growing the population grows the economy. More customers for business maintains demand, helping the service sectors of economies grow. Another reason for the big business lobby to pursue this is to undermine the bargaining power of workers. This is the reason wages have not kept up with either inflation or productivity growth over the past 40-50 years (worse in some countries over others). Pretty much all of the economic growth in the West since Globalization started has been a product of population growth, fuelled by immigration.
On Muslim immigration, the West has to be very careful what kinds of Muslims it lets in. There are some branches and sects of Islam that are fundamentally incompatible with secular society. Wahhabism and Salafism are two big examples. These are extremist sects that advocate for the creation of a global Islamic caliphate under Sharia law. They are the religious groups responsible for Al Qaeda and ISIS (Wahhabism is also the state religion of Saudi Arabia). They believe apostates (people who leave the faith), among other people, should be executed. The example in the video showing 30% of Muslim respondents saying terrorism was justified in some circumstances tells you what you are inviting into your country when you import these types of Muslim (not all Muslims are extreme, many are even secular). All immigrants who hold religious views should be made to swear support for secularism in the public and government spheres, and declare that they agree the legal system of their adopted country supersedes all religious law, and that religious law is void and unenforceable in their new country.
Having watched large scale immigration unfold in my country over the last 50 years my main observation is this: Assimilation takes time. A group of migrants may never fluently speak the local language, and they may maintain many of their original customs, but their children will be much more integrated. They go to local schools, learn the local language from a young age, and interact with other types of people through school and other activities. They may grow up with a foot in both worlds, but they will be adapted to and understand the local culture. After two generations people are generally fully assimilated. What can get in the way of this though is the creation of exclave ghettos where people of the same origin dominate an area exclusively. This inhibits integration, as instead of new migrants being forced to adapt to a new environment they can just recreate their old one in a new location. Migrants living in communities like this can go their whole lives barely interacting with the native population. Denmark is on the right track in limiting neighbourhoods to 30% max of any one ethnicity.
Lastly, on the subject of skilled migration. Believe it or not, Western countries importing skilled migrants from the developing world are exacerbating refugee crises and increasing the number of economic migrants. As the West skims all of the smartest and most able people from other countries, luring them in with more money, they completely undermine the ability of those countries to improve and develop. They stay poor and under developed because they don't have enough skilled or educated people who could form the basis of a middle class, and who could build a more advanced economy and society. This then encourages more poor people from those countries to try and migrate to rich countries. If the West was serious about helping the developing world, and if they want to ever see the end of waves of poor people knocking on their door, the would stop poaching the developing worlds best people. They would invest more in education and train their own doctors and engineers.
"As always it is big business that decides the direction a nation takes"
This is as an absurd statement to make about the Ponzi-scheme states of Western Europe, especially Germany which is literally destroying it's industrial economy in a pathetic attempt at 'net-zero.'
Regardless, mass immigration does not grow the economy period - as clearly proven by the current state of the Eurozone and how it has fared since 2013 when mass migration began in earnest. In fact, migrants are a dependent group that serve as little more than a net drain on the finances of the state. Slightly less than half of all council estates in London are occupied by foreigners and the Dutch government recently revealed that it has blown more than 400 billion euro on migrants in the last 25 years.
Ton gloubiboulga athégriste pedo-républicain n'a aucun sens.
Thousands of years of bloodlines, history, culture, and the sacrifice of millions undone in a few short decades.
This tragedy will be used as an example by future civilizations of what to avoid
this is truly heartbreaking. feels like we’ve betrayed our ancestors
WTF is wrong with yall?! The right will win the end and all the damage will be reversed. Why are you so hopeless? Dont you feel the tides turning? Now is our time.
@@melhiott7977 so Did your ancestors felt that they betrayed *their* ancestors when they converted to Christianity from paganism? Times change, culture change but boy does it feels good to be on the gaining side.
@@greyralph1637 my ancestors were the first ever nation to accept Christianity as their state religion, darling. Unlike the Islamic conquest of our neighbors, Iranians, there was no blood.
@@melhiott7977 doesn’t matter, no one forced my British parents to embrace islam either. If Europe wants to survive it must accept Islam or go the way of dodo( or japs)
I feel like leftist talking points weren't addressed here. The massive uneven exchange between the global north and south was brushed off as "the cruel lottery of where one has been born". The north also blocks any attempts at nation building, and it's countless incursions into the South's development throughout the 20th century are a major cause of migration.
This of course doesn't mean change in the ethnical composition of a population won't bring negative effects, (social unrest even) - but we must consider the fact that our cherised ethnostates and individualistic, christian, social democracy loving culture is a product of just a few decades (to 1-2 centuries at best), sprinkled in with some genocide, forced relocations, uneven treaties and civil wars. Some people suggest that the current state of our nations are the exception, not the norm, and we should be more open minded.
Although I don't really subsribe to these ideas, and certainly don't think that they negate the utter lack of social negotiation from policymakers; but they are important ideas to confront nevertheless.
The global south is where it is because of low IQ and geography.
We owe them nothing. Also why should we (the global north) care? This video is addressing our people. We dont need the approval of the south.
Whether you should be open minded is secondary, the point is that this situation would brew such inequalities that lead to the current european issues regardless. It's similar to the argument about democracy in israel: when you are an apartheid state, how do you keep democracy? The state is already fundamentally undemocratic by having to enforce apartheid. Yet apartheid itself heightens tensions, inequalities, demographic troubles, violence and conflit etc that lead to a path where this contradiction is solved only by further opening up/democratization which means dealing with the Palestine issue (and even then it has long term legacies afterwards) or by becoming more authoritarianism as we are seeing now in Israel. The alternative is jugging around in this contradictory state for as long as one can, but the situation might well become unsustainable with time when you least expect. When it comes to nation states, it's similar for Europe, but originally only at an external level - no wonder they left their colonies exactly when the alternative was giving colonized peoples the right to vote. The most obvious case perhaps were Algeria and Portugal (as soon as they decided they didn't want a dictatorship, independencies were given automatically).
Israel is the least apartheid like state in the middle east.@@FOLIPE
Your analysis is accurate. It's sad more then anything to witness Europe's downfall. I think you explained very well why immigration works differently in Europe and the USA. Its so frustrating that people don't get a say regarding their own lives in democracies, no less, and when they do speak out they get scolded and accused of being racist by privileged people who will never suffer the consequences of these policies. You mentioned the Lebanonazation process. Seams people forget what extreme diversity and cultural differences can do to a country. I'm not a European, but I do love Europe, I wish it's not to late for that beautiful continent.
Me as a 19 year old German, I'm so fucked up about the politics here in Germany and Europe. I'm moving out to the USA in a few years.
what possible political beliefs could you have that would make you think AMERICA is better than germany? they have worse cities, no welfare, more violence and a more open immigration policy? there is nothing for you there
yeah it’s definitely better there. goodbye
You don't have the smallest hope?
@@babyyoda1898 how
instead of heading to the center of the world's decaying global system, stick to germany and find a wife and have some children and do an honest productive none bullshit job.
that is how you can participate in saving your nation.
otherwise you are just being a superficial edgy egoist teenager who is looking for comfort and material satisfaction.
Denmark is the superior version of the Netherlands in basically every way possible.
As a Dutchman we are jealous of denmark asylum rules.
Here we have too many fake refugees that we cant send away.
And we give them houses before dutch people get houses
My parents are immigrants and even I think that mass immigration is terrible for Europe. Especially those that immigrate illegally. My dad's nephew keeps trying to ask him ways to get to Europe illegally. He's so pathetic honestly. My dad keeps telling him to study and do something good with his life but he won't listen lol. So we cut contact with him. Also, I hate the way that the people that immigrate here from my parent's country often have backwards views, don't assimilate well and have to shove Islam down people's throats all the time. I'm an atheist and I hate Islam lol. So seeing all these Muslims immigrate here is just worrying.
Also I hate that people are usually on two different extremes:
1. Racists that think no immigrants should be allowed in at all.
2. Leftist woke people who think any and all immigrants should be allowed in.
Theres something called the silent majority and when it comes to your last point we are against both the far left and far right.
Its just that u only hear from the louder minority
The one thing that boilers my blood is when Europeans are losing our countries. We called far right, when non white people are destroying our countries
Western Europe has become decadent, its immunity has disappeared. Once upon a time, I would have liked to live there, but today it is unimaginable. I am Hungarian and I am very happy that I live here and not there.
I'd rather live in 1900 Europe than its modern equivalent
ww1 and ww2
@@TurkishEmpire2023 at least those men fought and died for something
@AnthonyRizzuti Died without ever coming to the front? Cause the war was ended by Spanish Flu. How pathetic was that, wishing to die of a curable disease in modern time?
@@AnthonyRizzuti Still created horrible conditions and most of the countries and ideas those men fought for are dead
@@TurkishEmpire2023 Name one thing that got better that isnt in direct or indirect connection to technological progress (like peace) challange.
You cant name one thing. 1900 europe was heaven
And talking about this is illegal in some Western European countries.
like where
@@Sajid_A829 Germany or the Netherlands for example.
@@GansHanders hm, really? do you mean officially illegal or just looked down upon
If this narrative is not urgently and massively pushed to European masses and no action is taken, native European nations will find themselves in reservations in several generations.
KaiserBauch, you are doing God's work.
get ready for your reservation then
Our politicians know. They don't care--they're all in on it. I think we should try to make peace with it, build our small communities and keep to ourselves/care for our families.
@@VegaTakeOver get ready for your shower in poland
I would say for one, European countries especially Western european nations and the US should stop meddling in Middle eastern and African national affairs. If you aren't responsible for their current wellbeing then I don't see the point to why you'd have to take them in as refugees.
If you do want immigrants, why not allow only the ones who are willing to assimilate or are highly skilled individuals. I am sure there would be plenty of people who would want to move into Europe and assimilate instead of forcing their ideology upon the natives.
Europe should stop meddling and accepting refugees and focus on their identity first. This is one of the reason why Eastern Europe is still a lot better compared to Western Europe.
The mixed race endpoint proposed by Kaufmann should really not be viewed positively if you're a European.
Excellent video. Keep up the great work. 😎👍 Peace ✌🏻
Thank you!
@@kaiserbauch9092 Peace. Keep up the great work. I'm a black Catholic.