This content is derived from the Aranya Kanda in Valmiki Ramayana. 4 chapters (60-63) depict Shree Ram's profound sorrow upon discovering Ma Sita's absence. This emotional segment of the Ramayana showcases the inconsolable emotions of the all-powerful, all-knowing Bhagwan. I highly recommend everyone to read these chapters to truly understand the depth of Shree Ram's love for Sita ji. As I read these chapters, tears welled up in my eyes. I hope you too can experience the deep devotion and emotion they convey. Jai Siya Ram 🚩
See I know the character of Rama being a good leader proved his worth. But why'd he raise questions on Sita's purity,that too twice ? And that clearly tells how much he "loved" her 😢
Have you ever read Original Valmiki's Ramayan or just yapping anything only by seeing TV serial Ramayan? The original Ramayan written by Maharshi Valmiki itself ends in the Yudh Kaand and don't have a single verse about what you are projecting the incidents you're talking about is taken from later added unauthentic Uttar Kaand and that's too without context. Even in the Uttar Kaand Shri Ram wasn't the one who raised questions on Mata Sita's purity it was the narrow minded people of Ayodhya who got suspicious and as Shri Ram was a gracious king who always care about his people first before himself and his family he had to send Mata Sita to an exile to live in his Guru Vashisth's Ashram for the sake of his people and that too Mata Sita had obliged to do without any ill will towards Shri Ram.
You people are the greatest enemy of Hinduism or Sanatan Dharm not the muslims, leftists or others, who didn't ever read any single hindu scriptures by themselves and then boast or defame their own religion confidently.
@kumarichetna7966 nehh, I never watch daily soaps or movies based on mythological characters, just read ramcharitmanas,was okkayish , but time consuming. Hbu?
@@natashabepari6181 Ramcharitmanas came thousands years later after the only primary authentic source of Ramayan that is Valmiki's Ramayan. So if you are really interested in making comments on Shri Ram and Mata Sita first read it's primary and oldest source either first read then make any comment with reference or as you are saying it's time consuming and only mythological so don't read and stay silent choice is yours saying something in utter ignorance only makes you look dumb and if you are asking me then I have just completed reading Bhagavad Gita, ended other scriptures as well including Valmiki's Ramayan and now heading to read Upanishads which has some of the greatest philosophies ever made in human history.
@kumarichetna7966 cool bro,I've also read Geeta 6-7 times , it goes on repeat. Actually... It is the only text ,which I believe,required multiple readings..only then one could attain the truth from it 😇
This content is derived from the Aranya Kanda in Valmiki Ramayana. 4 chapters (60-63) depict Shree Ram's profound sorrow upon discovering Ma Sita's absence. This emotional segment of the Ramayana showcases the inconsolable emotions of the all-powerful, all-knowing Bhagwan. I highly recommend everyone to read these chapters to truly understand the depth of Shree Ram's love for Sita ji.
As I read these chapters, tears welled up in my eyes. I hope you too can experience the deep devotion and emotion they convey.
Jai Siya Ram 🚩
जय श्री सीताराम😮😊😢❤🎉👌💐
Jai shree Ram
Jai shree ram 🤗
You're so bful
Very good video❤
See I know the character of Rama being a good leader proved his worth. But why'd he raise questions on Sita's purity,that too twice ? And that clearly tells how much he "loved" her 😢
Have you ever read Original Valmiki's Ramayan or just yapping anything only by seeing TV serial Ramayan? The original Ramayan written by Maharshi Valmiki itself ends in the Yudh Kaand and don't have a single verse about what you are projecting the incidents you're talking about is taken from later added unauthentic Uttar Kaand and that's too without context. Even in the Uttar Kaand Shri Ram wasn't the one who raised questions on Mata Sita's purity it was the narrow minded people of Ayodhya who got suspicious and as Shri Ram was a gracious king who always care about his people first before himself and his family he had to send Mata Sita to an exile to live in his Guru Vashisth's Ashram for the sake of his people and that too Mata Sita had obliged to do without any ill will towards Shri Ram.
You people are the greatest enemy of Hinduism or Sanatan Dharm not the muslims, leftists or others, who didn't ever read any single hindu scriptures by themselves and then boast or defame their own religion confidently.
@kumarichetna7966 nehh, I never watch daily soaps or movies based on mythological characters, just read ramcharitmanas,was okkayish , but time consuming. Hbu?
@@natashabepari6181 Ramcharitmanas came thousands years later after the only primary authentic source of Ramayan that is Valmiki's Ramayan. So if you are really interested in making comments on Shri Ram and Mata Sita first read it's primary and oldest source either first read then make any comment with reference or as you are saying it's time consuming and only mythological so don't read and stay silent choice is yours saying something in utter ignorance only makes you look dumb and if you are asking me then I have just completed reading Bhagavad Gita, ended other scriptures as well including Valmiki's Ramayan and now heading to read Upanishads which has some of the greatest philosophies ever made in human history.
@kumarichetna7966 cool bro,I've also read Geeta 6-7 times , it goes on repeat. Actually... It is the only text ,which I believe,required multiple readings..only then one could attain the truth from it 😇