Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Alec Baldwin Attorney Drops Bombshell While Grilling Crime Scene Technician
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
- While cross-examining a crime scene technician, Alec Baldwin's defense attorney, Alex Spiro, dropped a bombshell saying that a retired officer went to the police station and dropped off live ammunition that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins after convicted armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed's trial. The officer is reportedly a close friend of the armorer's father. The prosecutor refuted the claim under redirect, stating the ammo brought into the station doesn't match the live ammo on the set of "Rust."
Subscribe to Law&Crime Trials for More Courtroom Coverage: bit.ly/LawAndC...
Watch More Alec Baldwin Trial Clips: bit.ly/AlecBal...
Famed actor and movie producer Alec Baldwin was indicted on one count of involuntary manslaughter in January for the death of 42-year-old cinematographer Halyna Hutchins. Hutchins died on Baldwin’s “Rust” movie set. Armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for Hutchins’ death. She was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
#AlecBaldwin #HalynaHutchins #LawandCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
![EST Gee - NEVER NEED (Feat. Selfpaid Savage) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f2cRtr52HXI/mqdefault.jpg)
Watch More Alec Baldwin Trial Clips: bit.ly/AlecBaldwinTrial
Always considered myself pro-law enforcement but this investigator has ZERO credibility. Defense absolutely destroyed her in my opinion. Proved she is there to regurgitate what the prosecution prepped her to say. She expects this jury to believe she doesn’t recall being told the ammunition was what killed the victim and also exactly what kind it was in terms of matching the live ammo that was in the firearm.
“I don’t recall”🤥🤥🤥what a joke. She would have clung to every word regarding that ammo that they were looking for to find the source of how it got on the set.
This investigator has zero desire to tell the truth and the whole truth and more so interested in convicting Baldwin and being the prosecutor’s puppet.
I think it’s a joke Baldwin is being charged honestly. Had a responsible armorer and this doesn’t happen. Period. .
@@rollbamaroll6518She sounds just like the witnesses in your Congress ! 😂
Strange how nearly everyone who does this with their own firearm which they are responsible for loading and unloading never gets charged! He should be charged as a person responsible for running everything!
@@rollbamaroll6518I totally agree 👍
Why would anybody want to watch it It's not newsworthy on a national level
She should lose her job. She ABSOLUTELY buried the report.
She was the ONE person from those 3 witches that actually saw the bullets looked the same. She should get fired, charged with perjury and sued by Alec.
That will erase that disgusting smirk we had to endure.
She is done!
She was told to bury it, yes
Meh, I think Hancock is more responsible
That's messed up. Tragic
Hot Tip: don't smirk in the witness box when you're appearing professionally, with the rare exception that the court laugh first...And nobody was laughing, least of all the judge
7:28 her smugness is positively suffocating.
She was being evasive and snarky. She intentionally mentioned a bullet that killed
It’s just a way of controlling one’s nerves.
Wow Drew - thanks for that “Hot Tip.” 🤢🤢🤢🤮
Hiding evidence to get a conviction must never be tolerated. It is more common than we may hope.
Does this possibly mean Hannah should be let go? Because police kinda botched her case?
@@actual_doge3221 Hannah? Who?
@@frankhoffman3566 The Armorer, the girl responsible for the guns
@@samsschool3639.... Sorry, I really don't follow celebrity trials. I really don't know the players or the charges against them.. It would be a situation where conduct would have to be analyzed in detail and I haven't done that.
My husband and mother were police officers, I’m embarrassed watching these police officers evading the questions from the defense. This is a case that the whole country is watching and the prosecution’s misconduct is disgraceful
Worst police in the nation.
The world was watching, not only America. Quite frankly when anything happens and "America" happens to be mentioned, it's automatically treated as a joke
I also have law enforcement family members. One day one of them was telling a story about how one of her coworkers did something wrong that got an innocent person in a casket. She was telling the story from the position that this poor coworker now had to deal with being investigated.... Family or not, they are all in the same corrupt system helping each other do corrupt things.
@@My_Crazy_NeighborWow. That is some next level narcissim/main character syndrome type ish. Sure, an innocent man lost their life and an entire family lost a son who could've have also been a husband, grandson, father, uncle, grandfather, etc... but the only important part that matters is how bad the cop felt about being the reason it happened.
Her evasive memory, movements, and smirks conjure suspicions beyond any testimony she gave.
And because of that he’s free
😂 the body language expert over here
Totally sus BS evasive answers.
Exactly!!!!
Yes, along with how she kept looking at the prosecutor when the pressure was turned up.
Love the "selective" memory. Not suspicious at all....
Agree she is edging on the answers. Probably just wants a conviction and not the truth.
She was so well rehearsed from the prosecution, that her sudden memory loss and glancing at the prosecution after every response after the defense questions her looks like she is panicked that "their" story is falling apart.
And it's only when the defense is questioning her 🙄
Yeah! Well you only got five subs, no thumbnail and fancy emojis. BIG DEAL! 🙄
@@premierpollo Nice trolling. No point made.
This witness seems very pleased with herself, she should be investigated to see if she was deliberately losing evidence
She just acts smirky,defiant and shady as heck.
I don't trust what this lady is saying at all.
She seems to have an agenda and selective memory.
I’m just now figuring out that she is NOT Rosie O’Donnell, although the resemblance is striking.
Her body language is showing so many lying red flags.
Agree. Red flags going up!
And I am convinced her agenda is in cahoots with the prosecutor 's DA) office. The DA wanted a HIGH PROFILE trial, for their own career. It is certainly a godsent to have such a trial, and very sad to have to say goodbye to it bc of a thing such as evidence. Never mind accusing a man and stressing him and his family for months, and possibly convicting him. All that, whatever, this is a career making trial .. or it would have been.
There was a crap show for law enforcement but she followed orders. CTE’s collect thousands of things for this case so them not remembering something from years ago is not surprising. The decision to fill it separately was HUGE (but not her decision). Also the attorney need to not call it a voucher. The judge was right in dismissing with prejudice.
Its called chain of custody, lady. She seems rather hostile if u ask me thoughout her testimony. Selective recall for sure
Boom, you nailed it.
Chain of custody.
She's hostile because she and a few others are about to lose their jobs and possibly lose their freedom.
“I don’t recall anything that makes me look guilty…” 😂
She the kind of lesbian nobody likes.
@@philliptaylor5386 his questions were designed to get "I dont recall" answers, she cant lie so he asked a bunch of stuff that she says on a daily basis and asked did she say any of it to him. He knows she doesnt hand over evidence to the defence its not her job but he asked it anyway to get her to say no. He knows her job is to just take the evidence and document it, and pretended he didnt know what that meant. He knows the error happened further up the chain of command but those would be too slick. So he asked a bunch of vague questions to get i dont know responses. Lets say her version is true, someone walked in, gave her some bullets said they were linked to the case, she called out a superior, they said document it and move on. She documented it, and moved on. Lets say while standing there she made idle chat, like she does with everyone, and now you ask her "did you talk about the weather?" "I dont recall", because if she says "no" and you have a recording then shes messed up big. "you told him youd get it rushed?" youd think "No" but cant be sure, because you know you have said that in past, so "i dont recall".
She’s being so profoundly evasive. She’s so exposed and so is every corrupt officer involved in this case.
She lied under oath.
"I don't know - i don't recall" annoying, she knows she's getting away with this by smirking, contempt.
You should be defending Alec.
I think that's her normal face....
I find her overall demeanor and appearance annoying. Now that the charges have been dismissed, this woman needs to be charged with perjury.
What is she getting away with. What did she do wrong
@@Meoffjackk01 Oh im sorry I don't know - i don't recall
Awful witness.
never stopped smirking
@@rbell7666the perjury charges will erase that smirk for sure 😂
She's just nervous
@@JimNortonsAlcoholismshe was rather combative even during the evidentiary hearing outside the presence of the jury
NOPE.... she's exactly as she should be. The male attorney is poorly skilled in trial procedure and questioning of witnesses (especially for the defense). Knowing how to lay basis for new evidence, and then asking questions that DO NOT get "surprise" answers is something HE is pretty bad at.
The fact she has to continually look over to someone to determine what to say is very suspect.
Exactly. She has been trained and it is gross especially because she works in law enforcement.
I haven't been watching the trial so I'm not familiar with the layout of the court room. Are you?
If not, wouldn't a simpler, better explanation be that she was looking at the jury when answering, as is common practice?
@@warpedweirdoThat’s exactly what it is.
@@starrystarrynight6281 The prosecution were accused of making hand gestures to the witness in the dock... There was a photo they claimed showed it but I never saw it..
She is so clearly lying and evasive.
no, he was entering ideas into the evidence by asking her questions she didnt know the answer to. Lets say you're in the box, and you had a conversation with a stranger, now lying will get you sent straight to jail, so only say yes and no when you are sure, now I ask "Isn't it true he asked you the time of day?" "Didn't you tell him it was a nice day?", you just answer "I dunno", but the jury starts getting ideas. So you and everyone else now think someone came in said to her "Look I have the bullets" and she said "Oh thats amazing I will get them to the lawyers right away, trust me" and then buried them, when her stance might be correct someone came in with some bullets, she documented it, and got on with the day with only making small forgettable talk with the person. When she says "No i didnt say that", she isn't remembering the conversation, she is saying "I have never in my life said that", but she cant be sure she didnt make small talk with the guy and say standard cop stuff to them.
Its how an exepnsive lawyer turns a missing label on a book look like a conspiracy against their client. Seriously none of the lawyers questions made any sense at all, and had no evidence value. He just had to sell it as a conspiracy.
That is not ok if it’s true. Everything should be disclosed to defense in order for a fair trial.
Tell that to the judge in the Karen Read trial.
I agree completely.
@@laurenurban3942that trial is over. And karen will ride off into the sunset soon
The case was dismissed over it.
Man oh MAN do I have news for you!
She answers her questions so smug and sure of herself with an attitude. Although,…..Her chest is red with embarrassment
So?
It means she’s not well liked
@rogerc23 *So?!* So she just derailed the trial and gifted Baldwin a mistrial.
@@ytsm No the judge did that. But she’s been trying to do that for months so it was of no surprise.
@@rogerc23 the judge wasn't the one who withheld the evidence, son.
She may be smirking but her demeanor suggests she is about to burst into tears.
Yes she was extremely anxious and on the verge of tears.
Wow, someone who is incapable of remembering anything should not be permitted to be a police officer.
She’s getting redder and redder….
I bet you would get pretty red on the stand as well. Not a fun place for most people.
Most ppl I see only get that red when they’re LYING or if they just got back from running a fkn mile! Ffs the real question is why is she lying? I don’t get it
@@odysseydiagnosticsNot true
@@tetsuoshima7385 I don’t believe u. Prove it
@@odysseydiagnostics I get red if I am having a hot flash, but she is too young for that. lol No doubt she was nervous or angry or both.
There's a lot of ' convenient amnesia ' going on here
Does not matter its all a red herring he has almost ZERO to work with his client is guilty. All smoke and mirrors. It worked on you maybe it will work on the Jury. But NM residents are more up on guns that the average state.
Because lines of questioning are so awful. The point he tried to make was just blown out of the water by the State. This clip ended too early. The next few minutes/hours are golden!
Well she didn't pull the trigger Alec did.
Except for the withhekd you might have right...lol@@Physics072
And the jury will notice.
The smirking on a case where someone lost their life... reads Liar as well as psychopathic!
This Crime Scene Technician is realizing she's been caught out!
Her memory seemed flawless when Morrissey questioned her. Hmm 🤔
Too bad they NEVER go to jail for perjury.
Right? Suddenly during cross all of a sudden she doesn’t know / doesn’t recall anything
She's not doing any favours for the prosecution or the jury for that matter
Because they go thru the questions before hand. When I was questioned by my lawyer years ago, she told me what would be asked.
They made a joint decision to try and bury it, im sure. A high profile trial is a godsent for a prosecutor's career. Now they missed out, look at that, how sad, lol.
Usually law enforcement is much better at lying than this
And here I thought Alec was the worst actor in the room
@@eeayquetting5963 ..thank you!!! someone with some sense!! this has crooked written all over it! The prosecutor did not forget to hand over a box of bullets. They didn't even argue against it really...
😅
I know - amateurs!
LOL
Strange how her memory goes when questioned by the defence but not the prosecution
When you're using language like hers, it's obvious to everyone that you're fighting for your life cause you know you did something wrong.
Whoa... witness is being super sketchy. This is BAD for prosecution
She is disgusting . I loathe liars .
That is Soooo true!!! Very bad in jurors eyes!
It means nothing. State law is clear. Can't gun people down. Maybe next trial it will help,but not here.
Turns out you were very accurate. Case dismissed with prejudice.
What’s so funny and why so smug? WOW DESPICABLE !!!
DITTO! SMUG faced Alex or Alec Baldwin!
The more she doesn't recall the redder she gets!
Oh man this woman was sickening…. The smirk and they way she kept looking for approval from prosecutors 🤬🤮
I don't like this lady's smirk.
there is a lot of smirking in general
It’s egregious and the judge should address her smug look and attitude. She isn’t even hiding the fact that she’s trying to help convict Alec. And who does she keep looking and grinning at?
She apparently has the cognitive competency of Biden. She is making everyone associated with LE on this case look shady. I don’t even like Alec but truth is truth and a sloppy case is a sloppy case.
Almost as unpleasant as Baldwins smirk.
Isn't she totally smug and indignant? Get real. Hope she isn't purgering herself.
@@uschurchI know right! Girl think that it's not of her concern. She got that " whatever " mentally
That was a lazy investigation by this crime scene investigator imagine how she conducts investigations on other cases.
She is NOT the investigator but the lab technician.
You really aren't keeping up...
She is not a crime scene investigator.
She's a technician and they called her because she has less information, knows way less, and is easier to discredit. Keep up.
It's been posted over and over....she was a crime scene tech NOT the lead investigator.
There should NEVER be live rounds on a movie set.....PERIOD!!!!
I'm surprised this woman is able to work, she doesn't recall anything at all....She should get herself checked out by a professional.....
Doesn’t recall things for the defense, but remembers everything for the prosecution. Selective
How do you remember the shape on a bullet, but not looking for the box of ammunition in the armors room.
They wanted to win this "big case" and that was it. They didn't care about the law. That woman on the stand was so rabidly cronyish that it was absolutely cringe. She wasn't even trying a little bit to hide her glee at "getting one over" by saying, "heh heh, I dunno? Y u ask dum quesh-chun?" She embarrassed herself horribly, and isn't intelligent enough to realize it. The sheer level of unprofessional mannerisms she displayed, and glee in trying to destroy someone's life and career for giggles, is horrifying.
Those withholding evidence should face prison for perverting the course of justice.
This isn’t a cold case from 20yrs ago. Saying i do not recall every other question is mind boggling.
The witnesses did the same in the Karen Read Case
@@whitneymarie4007 Karen read had a case Baldwin has no case.
So random People were Dropping
off Rounds at the PD as Evidence ?
What ? 😅
It was fake evidence from a friend of Hannahs father
Seth Kenny, the Rust FFL guy was more deeply involved than some people know. He may not of wanted to harm or kill any crew, actors BUT I think Kenny did want to make Reed, producers look bad. Show the lapses, safety issues on set. OSHA or IATSE 📋 would review the set, complaints at some point. Somehow the .45LC loads got into AB's single action revolver.
If anyone handles evidence before investors, it's not admissible in court.
NO, somebody he said their name, who was there on set hid the real ammo box the round that killed her came from during the trail, the person handed it off to a family friend during Hannah Gutierrezs trial, who owned the same gun, as every gun collector has this gun, the Sherriffs office had this information and the original box of ammo, and they not only didn't tell the defence team, they hide the whole event from everyone, so at the end of the day , there was a box of real ammo on set...which changes everything.
And should probably let the kid go too
She behaves like a guilty person that is fully aware of their own implicit bias.
She’s such a snarky witness!😂
HIDING EVIDENCE!
Its clear :)
She is the most incompetent employee and should be terminated. And instead of having some self awareness, showing embarrassment at her incompetence, she sits there smug. "I dont reacall" is all she's got. 😔
She works for the sheriff's department. Cops always say "I don't recall." when on the stand. They've been coached too in court for decades. This isn't anything new.
Sounds like anyone, ever that’s been called before congress…I don’t recall, I don’t remember, blah blah blah…
@@jody7214💯
THANK YOU ! YOU are the only person in addition to me that sees what is Really going on here!!!!
I had to testify in front of a group of lawyers regarding a serious car crash that my friend was in. My friends lawyer told me if I’m asked a question that I am not sure of the answer…. Say that you don’t recall…. And I was to never guess and to be honest if I’m asked a question, such as what type of car a certain person drives. The car was definitely dark blue but im not sure if it was a Toyota or an Acura…. I was to just say I don’t know.
Why would they have live lethal ammunition on a movie set or movie production , I think this goes a whole lot deeper than people think!
Some of the crew were shooting cans after hours at the set.
Because the armorer that was hired for the production was an adolescent kid who was irresponsible - as adolescent kids are - and unqualified for the job. She made personal use of the prop weapons and didn't adequately inspect the weapons after she used them; with disastrous results. The notion that Baldwin bore any criminal liability in this situation is a stretch; a pretty BIG one if you understand how a film set works. Especially since Hannah Gutierrez was rightfully convicted of manslaughter. Responsibility for those weapons was HER JOB. It's the only reason she was on the set at all. BUT, as a producer of the film, Baldwin certainly bears civil responsibility for hiring her. He should and probably will be sued by the Hutchins family, I'm sure. The production insurance should cover whatever settlement is reached, though; that's what it's for. It won't come out of his pocket personally.
She hates the word "seek".😂
Can't stand her smug smirking!
Me either 😮really don't like her and I can't stand the blond prosercuter
Its like she's so proud of herself
I HOPE she reads these comments
@@lindavergata8207 Even if she does read these comments she undoubtedly will "not recall" reading these comments if she stays in character of the totally useless and lying crime scene tech. Her smug denial of the specifics of the case will only lessen her credibility in the long run. In the short term she simply comes across as pathetic.
@@Mikeycrescent1952 Which happens to be 14 minutes and 45 seconds longer than her attention span!
I am retired law-enforcement. He's presenting his questions to the wrong person. She is not a law enforcement officer. She is a crime scene technician and does what she is told to do. This defense attorney needs to be asking the law enforcement officers that directed her work.
Totally agree. Unfair to ask her all those questions as though she is responsible for the investigators job,
Hopefully, he is leading up to that for later...if not, he is a weak lawyer.
Ex-cop doesn’t equal lawyer.. Most cops don’t even know what the law actually is.. if these questions weren’t proper you don’t think Baldwin’s attorneys would be objecting..?
I think it's called putting down a foundation.
She’s the lead investigator. She should know this crap.
I absolutely LOVE that the Case was DISMISSED!!!
BS Whole Thing He never meant to hurt anyone
“I don’t recall any of the facts in this case that make me look guilty…”.
This witness is obviously biased. The smug attitude is really irritating. She is in forensics? She can't remember what she had for breakfast, let alone any "work" that she's been involved in during the investigation.
She is just a tech who appears as though she feels she is being blamed for something. I have been on the stand many many times as an expert witness on drug testing and it is very easy to get emotional if you feel as though you are being blamed for something you had nothing to do with. As she said, she has nothing to do with turning over evidence to the defense. She has a boss and the boss told her what to do with what some man off the street brought in. Witnesses like her are used to having their words be twisted by attorneys and she was on guard. As far as remembering every detail, you have to understand that this is not the only case she is working on. If she does not recall every detail then that is understandable and she said so. It is nerve wracking to be on a stand.
@@tonyawhitten5199All she had to do was tell the truth.
So smug! And arrogant. Not a great combination of personality traits. Someone died here!
She gives strangely contradictory answers at times, too. Never seen a crime scene tech come across this sketchy/questionable.
and now we learned she wouldn’t even complete her reports on time. 😅
I knew it! Seth Kennedy and Sarah Zachary provided the live rounds. Why else would Sarah Zachary throw away the ammunition?
Sarah Zachery instantly destroyed evidence.
Kenny should have been arrested
Wow. Do you know if they took plea deals or got immunity?
I felt this from the very beginning. They set up Hannah
@@poodee9395absolutely as should Sarah
Prayers to Ms. Halyna Hutchins and her family. 🙏
Will she be charged with a crime? A man's freedom was on the line here.
Funny how she remembers everything when the prosecutor asks her questions...
Because the prosecutor was asking her questions relevant to her actual duties.
Can’t believe how dense this comment section is. This wasn’t a bombshell. This was another red herring.
@@gwilki2 Unfortunately, True Crime attracts a lot of low I.Q. and critical thinking challenged people.
@@gwilki2its always so painful in the comments.
@@gwilki2the defense attorney couldn't differentiate between a valid question from the Prosecutor bc he was making up his own scenario.....his objections were pretty much overruled
😂😅 She couldn't recall the dates of the previous trial nor the name of the guy who brought the ammunition in. Both things the prosecution asked.
Crime scene tech is not telling the complete truth. She is too smug!
That smug smirk...as if to say "look how clever my answer was".
This Judge did the right thing. I am so relieved that she dismissed this case. Like him or not the Judge has integrity.
They handed Alex a gun " loaded", presumably safe. A loaded gun is loaded. He probably wouldn't known the diff between the amo...he trusted the expert. It was an accident
She should have worn a turtleneck sweater. Her body gives away her stress in red flushes😏
Put a turtleneck on her and she’s Velma Dinkley
then she would sweat red and melt away. 😂
but she doesn't want to look even more like a man. she needs feminine attire.
I get the same way. A lightweight scarf is more effective since it's less smothering than a turtleneck, and less likely to cause overheating 😅
My wife just turns red when talking about the weather. She has Rosacea but the issue if on the stand should be addressed to explain the condition. My wife turns red during any convo for any topic 😂
Her body language is hilariously transparent 😂
Truly a Perry Mason moment! This witness, exemplifies what is wrong with our justice system.
Gosh, law enforcement "buried" evidence that may help the defense. Never seen that before!
Never happened. (Note the sarcasm)
She sure doesn't recall very much considering the gravity of the situation and her position as lead investigator regarding the ammo. Seems like incompetence by the sheriff's office.
She was asked and said she is not a detective. She’s not lead investigator.
People have the right to a fair and speedy trial. The trials were not speedy and probably not fair.
@@chrisgast speedy trial doesn't mean they skip over evidence and arguments, it means they don't sit in jail for ten years waiting for it to start. In this case nobody is sitting in jail and it is the victim's family that has been waiting years.
she is a technician not an investigator.
Her smirking doesn’t help either
She can't recall if they were live rnds? She's lying. As the lawyer said, they buried it. Wow.
She knowa exactly what he said. Semantics is not for us a life was lost. One injured.
She's in on the set up.
I’m so tied of these cops being deceptive.
She’s a technician
You mean straight up liars?? ALL LEO are straight liars!!!
@@deborahoneillmccarthy7032 They all work together as one, including the DA as well.
She doesn’t recall anything. How convenient‼️
Ladies and gentleman, meet Karen! Alec Baldwins attorney exposed her for what she is.
This witness is lying, obfuscating and betraying her mission. Disgusting.
And you know that how?
@@patricias5122
Look, I came into this thinking AB was at least guilty of recklessness [click/tap my name and see my history], but c'mon. Just watch the video. It's obvious this witness is trying to reframe the question and answer in a less than straightforward manner. Some bs is afoot here
Her chest goes normal to a frying red. That's a fact. That is a classic physical symptom of someone embarrassed and lying!!!!!!!!! Yes I am a qualified health professional. If she told the truth the prosecutor she answers to would fire her
@@pennylane8318what about the smirk, rolling of her eyes & side-eyes. The change in attitude between defense & prosecutions line of questioning is glaringly obvious.
And she keeps looking over at the Prosecutors
Acting clueless when the defense cross examines you just shows the bias in this case. Everybody wants to get a promotion trying to help the state get the big win 🤦♂️ that's the red flustered face of a liar
She's only a technician, for pete sake, lol.She is NOT the detective on the case.The guy who turned in the bullets, wanted to changed the direction of the case, to accuse someone else....she was NOT aware of this.
Glad you're not a detective. you would get fired on day one.
@@doloreschansey9556 oh look the girlfriends in the house😂😂
Boom.💯
Preach!!!!!!!
Sheriff's office seems to have had an agenda 😮
She smirks. She can’t remember anything that was so relevant to the case.
“I don’t know, I don’t recall.” Didn’t write a report, didn’t interview anyone, didn’t take a statement. What did she do?
Maybe she works for the Mafia and not for the police😂 Every suspect is happy about such an investigator
Love it I love her she is getting him so mad
@@barbarascott3945 and all these people commenting ! bahaha
None of those things are her responsibility. She collects physical evidence and tests it.
She did not have to interview people. She is a lab technician, NOT the investigator. She did write a report which went to her superiors.
Why’s NM going after Alec Baldwin? Everyone involved and others in the industry have said that actors have no responsibility whatsoever over weapons and arming those weapons. The judge in the armer’s trial told the armer that she alone was responsible for the death of the poor woman. So WTF is going on here?
My feelings exactly
New Mexicans trying to be more important than they are. Small town mentality.
Feelings and emotions isn't grounds to ignore state law. R u paid to pretend not to know state law? Hundreds of videos on NM state law bc this trial and you clowns choose to not watch any of them. Why.
Alec Baldwin wasn't just the actor in the movie, he was the director. That means he's responsible for EVERYTHING on set.
The SCREENACTORS rules gave NOTHING to do with the LAW! Helloooo?!!
Lady was already coached by the prosecution how to answer certain questions, the best answer is always I do not recall
She keeps looking at someone and smirking.
The victim said point it here. Plus, I have no idea how he was supposed to be responsible for everyone’s job - a doctor trusts a nurse, we trust the road crews don’t leave explosives on the road, for examples… and Alex trusted others had done their jobs. I think it is horrible they have charged him with this, I think they just want to look like they have done something so charged the big name. I don’t know him nor care particularly, but it seems so unfair. It was, on his part, the wrong place at the wrong time but not his fault
Exactly!!
That defense works when he shoots an actor during filming of a movie. That isn't what happened. While not being filmed, he was playing around with the gun, and pulled the trigger while it was pointed at the cinematographer, shot her, and killed her.
Exactly!!
@@skittleboy15but he knew 4 people had cleared the gun. So it was not foreseeable that whatever he was doing with the gun it would fire a live round.
He needs to be liable in civil court - definitely. But criminal charges for anyone besides HGR are absurd.
Rest in peace, Halyna
witness keeps looking at the prosecutor for clues as what to say
He still lied about pulling the trigger .. no matter what…
She's smirking, turning red, refusing to answer truthfully, trying to talk around the issue.
LIAR witness.
Not as much as ALEC Baldwin😂
@@buckfiden1228 but he is not on the stand and lying under oath like she is big difference 🤷🏻♀️
He killed her and he's going to jail like anyone else would . Witness makes no difference. Cut & dry case.
Not a tragic accident either. Tragic carelesness all around
@@Tammy_26Irwin jails are literally full of people who accidentally shot someone….. what world are you living in?
@@buckfiden1228 the majority of them pulled a gun and meant to kill that person
So does that mean they were hiding evidence or are hiding?
Guess so.
No a third party brought in ammo years later no way to definitely say it came from the set
@@Paralleljen93but they should have investigated it AND informed the defence
Yes, state withhold potential evidence from the defense. Ammo pertaining to the case was brought to the authorities.
Yup state being lazy and not wanting to deal with this “new evidence” cost them the trial!
“ I don’t recall” , the staple of a liar.
What is a live gun doing at a movieset anyway???
*Her smug look frustrates me. She has the “This is my time to shine” demeanor. I pray the jury sees through this Smh…*
I agree.
Kinda like you had to put your comment in bold face
@@SpicyTexan64I love you 😂
she is vile. "I do not not recall that I am sitting here".
@@SpicyTexan64*How am I supposed to take it off? My font is the same every time I type. Its not a hack hahaha*
corrupt cops ?? OMG... Hannah is in jail, and the Sheriff is hiding evidence to keep her in jail ??? There's some real explaining that needs to happen.
Hannah is guilty. She is the one that brought the ammo and she is the one that didn’t check and also allowed the guns to be used by random crew for fun. She also was on drugs and drinking each night.
@@coleengogerty3852🎯
@@coleengogerty3852Check your facts Sarah got the gun and handed it to Hannah who handed it to Dave Hall who handed it to Baldwin. Right after the shooting, Sarah (who handed the gun to Hannah, remember) called Seth and immediately destroyed all the ammo. Both were given immunity to never face charges altho they know full well Sarah destroyed the evidence while Helyna lay bleeding on the ground.
Alec is more responsible than girl in jail. Alec was cheap .Hired a girl with zero experience and no clue how to do an important job to save money.
@@coleengogerty3852Alec was producer. Had 4o years in business. Hired a girl with zero experience. And no clue on how the job worked. She would say yes to any job Alec offered. She was a gopher . Alec saved money. To put her in that position
Who pulled the trigger? Where’s the responsibility? We should be accountable for one’s actions.
this needs to be investigated big time... all of these ppl involved with the prosecution of this case need to be analyzed for criminal wrongdoing and they need to be suspended without pay immediately until the investigation is completed.
This woman is clearly shady.
She’s not covering up well
This was deliberate. Really bad.
I would go over ALL of her testimony and question her ability to remember any of it to any accuracy...
This Investigator is infuriating.
Smug.
@@ccjdisI just noticed that nasty smirk . She will not be impressing the jury .
THIS IS NOT THE INVESTIGATOR. SHE IS A TECHNICIAN. Infuriating that your facts correct.
Didn't you hear? She's NOT an investigator. She's a lowly CST. She just does what she's told. ::cough:: ::cough::
Some dude shows up randomly, says " I've got the ammo that did such and such" and they are to take it as true and should put that into evidence?
Would someone more educated fill me in onto why?
This Troy guy seems like he's trying to stage the case against Seth Kenny & deflect blame away from Reed. Kenny was not some 🌹 in this tragic incident. I think Seth Kenny conspired with others on the Rust crew to create a unsafe set, working conditions to support industry complaints, 📑 grievances. It sounds trite & petty but the film, TV business is full of scummy 🐍. Scams...
your last line should be a/my bumper sticker. I'm intelligent enough (I have receipts) but not educated on every topic (who could be!) and I wish somebody could explain thins to me. "google it" my butt
They shouldn't. They were sent to be tested and found to be completely different.
The "Testor" fellow that brought them in probably committed a crime by providing false evidence..
THANK YOUUUU! Reed’s family friend brought in the evidence after her trial. Years after the shooting. The only bombshell is that these ppl will stop at nothing to escape accountability.
It’s still “evidence” and should have been disclosed to the defense. Why take the police’s word on it? Defense couldn’t do their own testing. It makes the police look biased or incompetent at worse.
Her attitude and body language incriminates her much more than her testimony.