My dna test says im a direct descendant of King Bela III and the Hunyadi Dynasty, which is where my Scythian and Beethoven DNA is also from. Now it makes sense. Ive been trying to follow this trail forever. This video helped, Thank you. Great video.
The genetic line of III. King Béla confirms the Hungarian chronicles, according to which the Hungarians and the Árpád dynasty are of Scythian-Hun origin. The R1a-Arp lineage is the most common in individuals recovered from Scythian and Hun cemeteries.
Scythian - yes, Hunnic - no. I had whole genome sequencing done and had my DNA compared to more than 500 ancient samples. Had this done for my parents and one grandmother as well. Turns out me, my father and his mother are all extremely close matches with King Béla III and King Ladislaus I. We're all exclusively European, just like the DNA of Béla and Ladislaus. Scythians were Europeans and so was the Árpád dynasty. The Hun origin story with Attila is a fairy tale, probably to claim superiority.
@@narc0polo966 A recent big genetic research from the Hun graves in Mongolia a few years ago. According to the results, the Hun graves found in the eastern part of present-day Mongolia had Mongoloid features, while the Hun graves found in the western part of Mongolia were European. In addition, a mixture of Sarmatian and BMAC was also found among the Huns. So it is a misconception that the Huns were purely Mongoloids or Europids. This is also the case with the Scythians, there is also admixture. It is interesting that the Eastern Scythians have the largest Europid mark while the Western Scythians have the largest Mongoloid admixture. In summary, the Scythians and the Huns were genetically mixed, including Mongoloid and European and their mixture. It is also a misconception that the Scythians spoke an Indo-European language, since no linguistic memory was left behind, this is just a hypothesis that serves to justify the superiority of the Westerners. It was recently identified by the Hungarians3. king Aba Sámuel's DNA, which belongs to haplo N1, the closest ancient DNA of which was found in a Hun grave in Mongolia, so the Hungarians' Hun origin is not a myth. The Hungarians are of Scythian and Hun origin, as there is overlap between them.
@@laszlokovacs8086 What exactly do you mean when you say "Mongoloid features"? The Scythians for example were European, no surprise, they lived in Europe. The tribes further east of the black sea were not considered Scythian by the Greek. It's a modern idea that these people were also Scythian and we need to reject it. DNA shows us it's not true. Scythians lived in modern Moldova, Ukraine, Romania and Hungary. 95% of my ancestors during the Iron Age were in fact Scythians who lived (and died) there. The Árpáds didn't come from anywhere else than there. There might have been some added touches through marriages, rapes, infidelity and so on but the majority of the DNA profile of King Béla III and King Ladislaus I is in fact of this Central European origin.
@@narc0polo966 I don't think so, the Greeks wrote a lot of truth, but also a lot of mistakes about the Scythians.. The Scythians are not a genetic group, but a civilization or culture, the essence of which is the steppe lifestyle and religion of horse archers and the ancient legal system. I would like to know what haplogroup your ancestors belong to, based on which you consider them Scythians? Also, I would like to know which of the nations alive today he thinks has the greatest Scythian heritage genetically?
@@laszlokovacs8086 I'm not basing it on haplogroups only. As mention before, I had whole genome sequencing done and then had my DNA compared to more than 5000 samples from archeological sites. Modern nations don't really share one common ancient heritage. It's all mixed up after migrations, invasions, conquests and other events. The closest modern populations to me are: Austrian, Czech, East German, South Dutch, North German, Hungarian, German Central and Southwest Finnish but none of them are very close to me genetically. Modern nations are much more genetically diverse than ancient populations. My father shares a lot of identified DNA segments with Béla III and also with samples from the Copper Age found in Bohemia and Germany. And a lot with samples from modern Ukraine and Hungary, Scythians and Goths at the time. I can tell you the closest modern and ancient populations to the DNA of Béla III, if you're interested. I spent a lot of money on this "hobby".
Bela III also came close to becoming Emperor of Byzantium (Basileus ton Rhomaion - Roman Emperor). Emperor Manuel I Komnenos of Byzantium, was himself half-Arpad, his mother the Empress Irene/Piroska was the daughter of King Ladislaus I of Hungary. Being without a son, Manuel invited Bela, then a prince, to Constantinople, renamed him Alexios, created him Despotes (the second highest rank to the emperor), betrothed him to his daughter and named him his heir apparent. If Manuel had not produced a son and heir late in his reign, Alexios II Komnenos, the personal union of the Byzantine Empire and Hungary under Bela might have drastically changed history. On the death of Stephen III of Hungary, Manuel's influence ensured that Bela succeeded him as king.
@tongobong1 Slav-Slöwen language originates from the area southern of Caucasian where vowelless languages have developed and Hungarian-Macar-Scythians have no Indo-Iranian a Slave genetics . Western Scythians where a Finno-Ugric alliance meaning Finnish-Hungarian while Eastern a more Turkic hence none where Indo-Iranian or Indo-Jewropean. Not even Roman called themselves or the surrounding people or land on this continent Jewropean and thats not because they didn't mixed with Jew-Jewnanistani-SeaPeople but simply because they knew that such identity is foreign on this continent. Even Deutsch call Hungarians as German in form of UnGar and not themselves similarly to other groups since UGar,UnGar,InGar,HonGri,VenGri,WanGer...OnoGuri are all by which others people call Hungarians. Hungarian King Béla 3rd simply got rebranded as Jewnanistani King Alexios together with the entire Cuman-Coman Byzantine dynasty and everything Hungarian-Macar-Scythian.
Genetic results prove that today's Hungarians are the AVAR and HUN peoples who lived in the territory of today's Mongolia, from where they were culturally connected with the Korean peninsula, distance was not an obstacle. Hello from Hungary.
@@sandors.5526And where are those „results“? Everything points rather to them being A Ugro-Saramtian mix from bashkortostan. (kusnarenkovo/Sargat culture)
I m Spaniard, and descendant of king Bella III of Hungary, as descendant of the kings of Aragon. Some Doctor on history from the University of Madrid made an investigation about my ancestors that took 25 years. I have to tell you that hundreds of people are descendants of Bella III in the provinces of Madrid and Segovia, and I guess thousands of Spaniards.
Looks like we’re distant cousins then! I am a descendant of James I of Aragon and Violant of Hungary. On mytrueancestry my dna matches with the same hablogroup found in the remains of Prince Andrew who was Bela III’s grandson and Violant’s half-brother.
I have Visigoth roots from Spain. After seeing your comment that made more sense. Because my closest genetic matches are relatively far away from Spain. Like outlier one from all close genetic data. My genetic data matched with King Bela III and King Ladislaus I. You can also find my partially detailed ancestry in the comment section. Thank you, and have a great day cousin 😅
@@istvansovari4208 I understand what you mean but I wouldn’t assume that’s it not true because of that. I’m not saying it’s true either but according to the mytrueancestry website they were able to identify that it was András because of the artifacts next to his resting place. Not to mention the remains carried the same R1a1a1b2a2a1 hablogroup found in III. Béla and 1. László. So even if it happens not to be András, the remains discovered were from a member of the Árpád dynasty. I am descended from the Árpád dynasty through my 9th great grandmother Mildred Reade (Warner). Mildred happens to be Elizabeth the II’s 8th great grandmother and George Washington’s great grandmother.
At the beginning of the video we are told that Hungarian belongs to the Finno-Ugric language family and we see a map. There is no nation on the map who we can understand a little bit of what it says... I say this as a Hungarian who travels a lot to the East.
Basically a modern day Hungarian then in autosomal DNA. The Magyars had been in the Carpathian Basin for about three centuries by the time he was born, I guess it makes sense. Very interesting analysis.
@@tongobong1 Modern Hungarians are basically the same as the bronze age inhabitants. The genome was mostly identical with the past 3500 years. Nothing slavic... Rather the slavs have also a huge number of aboriginal preindoeuropean DNA.
@@xerxen100 Modern Hungarians are totally different from bronze age inhabitants. Don't you know that many nations came to Hungary in the past 3500 years?
@@tongobong1 But none of them no exterminated the locals completly, not to mention that the locals and Hungarians speaked a very similar language. Enough just seeing the Dacian Gold tresures and the Hungarian ones. Almost identicals.
Royalty was quite "diverse" even in that day, as they regularly married foreigners in order to fulfil certain political goals. Béla's mother was Euphrosine of Kiev, her paternal grandmother, Helena of Serbia. His grandfather was Álmos (not the tribal chief, but the son of Géza I, of the same name), whose wife was Predslava of Kiev. Álmos' own mother was Sophia of Loon, who hailed from current-day Belgium. It is really not that surprising that Béla's maternal genetic heritage looks quite "European" 🙃 Following this line, he was first betrothed to Maria Komnene, daughter of the Byzantine emperor Manuel Komnenos, but when that felt through, he married Agnes of Antioch, also known as Anna oh Châtillon, the daughter of the infamous crusader and robber baron Raynald of Châtillon. When she died, Béla married Margaret of France, the daughter of Louis VII.
Southern Polish from my mother.. did a test on Uncle to find out a little mystery with my Grandfather.. R1a and apparently not subclades of the West Slavs and we have a link with Arpad.
I had a friend in the States who was ethnically Polish, and had always identified that way (his place of birth and rearing was the Chicago area), but genetic testing also indicated he had some Hungarian heritage as well.
@@barrymoore4470 That's cool. Yeah there's a saying in Hungarian... Lengyel, Magyar két jó barát - and in Polish - Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki.. Full version meaning - Pole and Hungarian brothers be, good for fight and good for party. Both are valiant, both are lively, Upon them may God's blessings be.
@@shaolindreams My friend enthusiastically embraced his Hungarian ancestry, while still taking pride in his Polish roots. It's good to know there is this long-standing rapport between the two peoples.
@@barrymoore4470 I feel the same way as your friend. It's kinda amazing what you can find out today. Long live the brothers and sisters! Thanks for your comments.
@@barrymoore4470Polish doesn't have a meaning in Polish language whose genetics does show them being a Indo-Iranian hence since Hungarian call then Lengyel a leAnGelic people which is what Hungarian-Macar-Scythian are most Polish are very much Hungarian.
R-Z645 CARPATHIAN BASIN BC 3900 NEOLITIC FARMERS, R-Z93 MOLDOVA BC 3000 LATE TRYPILLIA, R-Z2123 BACTRIA BC 2300 BMAC, R-SUR51 XIONGNU - VOLGA-URAL HUNS , R-ARP5 CARPATHIAN BASIN (HUN REALM). THE MTDNA N1A1A1A1 HAVE SAME ROOTS.
My ancestors are Turkish from Bulgaria. I did a DNA test and my DNA matched with King Ladislaus I, King Bela III, Johannes Corvinus, and Christopher Corvinus. My haplogroup is also R1a from Central Asia(R-S23592, 1 delta away from Arpad haplogroup). I am not a direct descendant of course but they're my relatives. Also from the Rurik Dynasty, I matched with Gleb Svyatoslavich and Dmitry Alexandrovich. I have Hungarian, Ukrainian-Russian. Swedish, Irish, Maltese-Sicilian-Italian, Lithuanian, Romanian, and of course Turkish roots. R.I.P my uncle Bela III.
@marcosaronni6105 Thank you,, brother 😅. I thought I wrote but while arranging grammar I think I deleted it accidentally. I have Italian roots. I edited and added Italian after Sicilian which is very important. I have a connection with the House of Manfredini also. Amo così tanto l'Italia. 🇮🇹
Turkish is just cultural identity just like Chinese and Indian, when it comes to actual ancestry then it's very complicated unlike people like Japanese or Korean as their ancestry is very straight forward not complex. Turkish, Greek, Italian and Spaniards etc.. are not homogenous people - they have very complex ethnic make up
Back then, till the Chine great wall, only white eastern europens lived. This is why you cant find significant asian ancestry even in the Avar khaganate peoples DNA (max 20%). Shortly, they were just came back home.
10th century remains were already analyzed. they were already mixed back then showing more European but def. some Eastern (Asian?) remains. Bottom line they already spent hundreds of yrs in Europe freely mixing w locals
Finnish/Inuit? LOL. I'm hoping you meant something like Finnish/Lapp (Sami/Sámi, in Finnic it's much more simmilar). Anyway, the closest linguistic relatve to Hungarian are not Finnish or the like but rather the Ugrics of West Siberia: the Khanty and the Mansi. However the Magyars had been roaming the European steppe for some time before being pushed by the Khazars into migrating to Pannonia, and even before that we know that the Indo-Iranics had intense interaction with the Uralics of NW Asia. All this probably explains his Central Asian R1a paternal ancestry. As for the rest, it's probably admixture in Eastern Europe first and in Central Europe later. Early Magyars were infamous for their massive raids in Germany and Italy and even further west all the way to Catalonia, in which they pillaged many slaves, notably women (killing all the men, the kids and the elderly and only bringing young women as captives, in one instance naked and tied to each other by the hair reportedly, was common practice of the pre-Christian Hungarians and it may explain their unusuall genetic westernness in their geographic context).
How can you even know? Have you even heard of cuckolding, adoption and pedigree collapse even? If people so old left any descendant, then we all descend from them one way or another, every single European is related to any other European at timeline of c. 1000 years ago, and Alfonso is almost that old.
Some Scythian symbols in the Hungarian tradition. Four lilies around the sun on the Solti hair braid and Scythian carpet. Heart-shaped lily on Scythian carpet and Hungarian beads. Tulip with a seed in the abdomen on Scythian jewellery, on a Sarkad bracelet and in Hungarian folk art. Bird with beak in contact with its breast on Scythian, Reformed and even Catholic churches, and on embroidery from Raba. Antlers ending in a lily on Hungarian salt cellars and on Scythian tattoos in Paziriki. Burning antlered deer on the Scythian horn of the Green Phalompusta, in the legend of the miraculous deer of St. László of Vác. In the legendary hymn, the miraculous stag also has burning antlers! In the Paziriki carpet, the boy who became a deer also appears. Turul, or griffin, above the stag, from the Scythian medieval church of Székesfehérvár, on a stone carving of an arched doorway, on a railing of a sanctuary in Zalavaro. Eagle's head with ears in Scythian, Avar, monastery excavated in Bélapátfalva. Vines enclosed in lilies or tulips on Scythian, Avar belt ornament, ribbon of bishop's mitre, Székely gate. Burial on horseback. Blood covenant, in which the contracting parties became brothers and sisters by giving the blood of the body. A lion attacking a deer in Scythian and Hungarian salt cellars. Horned lion with tree of life in Hungarian folk art, on Székely cap and Sarmatian headdress. Could they be lying to us?
As a Hungarian, thank you so much for this video! I've been waiting for this for a long time. 💖King Béla III DNA is very similar to mine (and many other Hungarian's) DNA: 60.9% East European, 23.3% Balkan, 15.8% Irish, Scottish, Welsh.
Yes you Hungarians are actually Slavs since you have similar DNA to your Slavic neighbours and totally different than Finish whose language is closely related to Hungarian.
The first Humans to have Haplogroups R1a were the Ancient North Eurasians, an ancient human population that was genetically more related to the current Indigenous Siberians and Native Americans, the Ancient North Eurasians mixed with the Western Hunter Gatherers giving rise to the EHG. , (75% ANE + 25% WHG), the Eastern Hunter Gatherers had children with the Caucasian Hunter Gatherers, giving rise to the Western Steppe Herder or more popularly the Proto-Indo-Europeans (50% EHG + 50% CHG). The Pro-Indo-Europeans of the steppes mixed again with European Farmers and European Hunter-Gatherers, giving rise to modern Europeans.
Before the expansion of the Proto-Indo-Europeans from the steppes, the Paternal Haplogroups were I1 and I2, I1 was related to the European Hunter-Gatherers and I2 was related to the European Farmers, Haplogroup R was scarce before this steppe expansion
The Afanasevo culture (probably proto-Tocharians) were also mostly R1a, just as Corded Ware in Central-North Europe... but not Khvalynsk-Yamna, who were R1b (of a specific Volga subclade, not directly related to West European R1b or other branches in Asia and Africa). That Afanasevo R1a has remained in the area, especially in Altai, until present day.
@@LuisAldamiz The autosomal DNA of the early Tocharians reveals that they are 80% Ancient North Eurasians and 20% Northeast Asian. This DNA is typical of Central Asian Hunter Gatherers and is reminiscent of the genetic makeup of Native Americans (70% Northeast Asia and 30% Ancient North Eurasians).
It will be interesting if you will do comparison of genoms of Bella and his bashkir genetic relatives. All the bashkirs I know who made dna test have the same mix of eastern European, Scandinavian, Balcan and even Irish genes. Even if there ancestors always lived within the boundaries of historic Bashkortostan and never even visited mentioned territories.
According to Hungarian legends the conquest of the Carpathian Basin was a return to the land of the ancestors. We also know from historical documents that not all Hungarians came to find the land of their ancestors (today Hungary) but a significant portion was left in the East. Friar Julian went to find them in the XIII century and reported his success to the king. After the Mongol invasion of the area this remaining Hungarian population was nowhere found. Now the genetics found them in Bashkiria. Since Hungarians migrated first East from today Hungary and only a portion returned to Hungary it explains the genetic mix of Bashkirs, the remnants of the old Hungarians coming from the West.
@@freebozkurt9277 In addition to the Hungarian tribes, they also participated in the ethnic distribution of the demographic massto Hungarianization: 1. Barsilii/Bersilii (Varsány in Hungarian), Asian tribe of Turkic origin, related to the Khazars and Bulgarians. 2. The Berenii/Barangeri (Berény in Hungarian), Asian tribe, supposed to be of Tunguso-Manchurian (Turanic) origin, which was part of the great Avar Horde, settled in the Pannonian Plain approximately in 670;3. Bulacii (Bulak in Hungarian), Asian tribe of proto-Bulgarian (Turkish) origin, settled in the Carpathian basin between 750-800, alongside the non-Hungarian ancestors of the Szeklers. 4. The Kozars (Kozár in Hungarian), generic name given to the Khazars, descendants of Khazar; 5. The Eslars (Eszlár in Hungarian), a tribe of Alan (Indo-European) origin. The name is preserved in the name of the locality Tiszaeszlár (Tisza-Eszlár) in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county. 6. Herenii/Chechens (Herény in Hungarian), Caucasian tribe that was part of the old Hungarian tribal union. 7. The Iorsi (Örs in Hungarian), Asian tribe of Turkic origin. This is supposed to be, along with the Kavari and Kalizi, one of the three Khazar tribes that joined the old Hungarian tribal union; 8. The Ladans (Ladány in Hungarian), a Caucasian tribe of Iranian (Indo-European) origin settled in Pannonia together with the Hungarians; 9. Nandorii (Nándor in Hungarian), a tribe of Bulgarian (Turkish) origin settled in Pannonia before the Hungarian invasion, precisely in the year 830. 10. Kalizii (Káliz/Kálaz in Hungarian) one of the three Khazar tribes (along with Kavari and Iorsi), supposed to be of Indo-European origin, who joined the old Hungarian tribal union; 11. The Kelfans/Kolpans (Kölpény in Hungarian), a European ethnic group of uncertain origin, probably Scandinavian, whose name may come from the old Scandinavian kylfingr (from kylfa - club, club). They were recruited by the Hungarians as elite soldiers. 12. The Palots (Palóc in Hungarian), a population of uncertain origin, presumably Turkic, considered to be descended from the Pechenegs, a fact suggested by the ethnonym Paloț < Poloŭț < Poloveț/Polovți attributed to the Pechenegs by the Slavs. 13. Pechenegs (Besnyő in Hungarian), Asian tribal union, of Turkic origin, settled in the Pannonian Plain before the Hungarians. Among the fully Magyarized tribes we know the following:Culbeii (Külbej in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · Ciurii (Csur in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · Erdimi (Értem in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · Baii (Baj in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · The Tolmacs (Tolmács in Hungarian), a Pecheneg-type tribe of Turkic origin; 14. The Sabiris (Szabir/Szabor in Hungarian), an Asian tribe of Turkic (Hunic) origin that participated in the ethnogenesis of the Khazars. There is also the hypothesis of the Finno-Ugric origin of this tribe, with the specification that it endured a deep Turkization process. From the name of this tribe comes the name Siberia, the place of formation of Ugrofins; 15. The Szeklers (Székely in Hungarian), an Asian tribe of Turkic origin, of the Kapceak type, which received an additional Turkic input, by merging with the Bulacii. 16. Şagii (Ság in Hungarian), a tribe of uncertain origin, considered by some to be of Indo-European origin, related to the Alans; 17. The Tarcans/Tarkanii (Tarkány in Hungarian), a tribe of Turkic origin descended from the Khazar kavars. Not to be confused with the Bashkir tribe of the Tarians (Tarján in Hungarian), also assimilated by the Hungarians; 18. The Varhunites (Várkony in Hungarian), a tribe of Avar origin, whose name is explained as a compound: Avar-Huns, settled in Pannonia in 567. Of course, apart from these auxiliary tribes of the Hungarians, we must also take into account the non-Hungarian, Indo-European and quite numerous populations for those times, over which the tribes from the old Hungarian tribal union (Bashkir tribes and 1 Ugric dominant tribe) settled upon their arrival in the Pannonian Plain: 1. the Germans, 2. the Slavs, 3. the Romanians. So there is no need for all Scythians to be Hungarian, nor to invent a shuttle from Pusta to the Urals with Caspian loops or that in Scythia Minor they spoke old Hungarian. When they dismounted, they also found populations that spoke languages similar to or compatible with Hungarian.
We are neither linguistically nor genetically related to the Finns. Anyone who compares spoken Finnish and Hungarian can immediately see the huge difference. The Finnish accent is completely different from the Hungarian accent. Even the Finns don't take this false kinship seriously anymore. This is a political pseudo-scientific theorem created during the Habsburg Empire. The Hungarian Academy of Sciences still takes this pseudo-scientific claim seriously. I noticed that the Hungarian language is closest to the Albanian language in terms of accent. Albanians learn Hungarian very easily and speak with an impeccable accent.
@@MihalyToth-w3q Hungarian is an agglutinative, Uralic-language. Albanian is a none-agglutinative, Indo-European language. They have nothing in common.
@@TheCatsMeoooow it is officially classified as the only member of an independent branch of the Indo-European language family. In fact, this classification was a political decision of the Albanians.
@@TheCatsMeoooow Ancient Greek was an easy language for Hungarians to learn for a long time. It was taught in high schools alongside Latin. Ancient Greek is also subsequently classified as an Indo-European language. Greek and Ancient Greek do not have much in common.
@@MihalyToth-w3q It still does not make Albanian an Uralic language family, or Hungarian an Indo-European language family. Latin was taught as the main language all over Europe.
Some Scythian symbols in the Hungarian tradition. Four lilies around the sun on the Solti hair braid and Scythian carpet. Heart-shaped lily on Scythian carpet and Hungarian ornaments. Tulip in the shape of a belly below with a seed in the ventral part on Scythian jewellery, on Sarkad bracelets and in Hungarian folk art. Bird with beak in contact with its breast on Scythian, Reformed and even Catholic churches, and on embroidery from Raba. Antlers ending in a lily on a vessel used to store Hungarian salt and on a Scythian tattoo in Paziriki. A miraculous deer with burning antlers on a Scythian horn from Greenhalomusta, in the legend of St. Lazarus' encounter with the miraculous deer. Even in folk ritual chants, the miraculous stag that became one with the boy has burning antlers! In the Paziriki carpet, the boy who became a deer also appears. Depictions of an eagle or griffin above a stag are found in Scythian Hun art, and in Hungary on a stone carving of an arched doorway from a medieval church in Székesfehérvár and on a railing of a sanctuary in Zalavaro. Eagle's head with ears in Scythian, Avar, monastery excavated in Bélapátfalva. Vines enclosed in lilies or tulips in Scythian, Avar archaeological finds, on the ribbon of a bishop's mitre, on the gates of Szekler. Burial with horse sacrifice. Blood pacts, in which the contracting parties became brothers and sisters by giving their blood. A lion attacking a deer on Scythian and Hungarian salt pans. Deer with tree of life in Hungarian folk art, on Szekler gates and on Sarmatian headdresses. Could they be lying to us?
Did the Vandals originate from Hungary? There are historians who wrote of their arrival in North Africa in 429. Historians specify that they passed through the Strait of Jibraltar in Morocco, they built a kingdom in North Africa from 429 until 533.
Everbody like: "How could his genome be all European, when hungarians descended from Asia just a few centuries before he was born...?" But what most people forget is that all/most European peoples descend from what we today call Asia, no matter the tone of their skin or eye color. The pale and blue eyed Europeans also descend from Asia, non the less. All of the currently native European genome made up a significant part of the Asian gene pool. It was later, as these tribes moved westworth, that the Asian gene pool changed into what it is today. One needs to understand the the historical prosess of the Asian migration into Europe; the Asian peoples migrating into Europe, became the Europeans of today. While the Asian peoples seen as a whole, changed as a consequence of the emigration of several folk groups, who totally left the continent to settle down in the West (now called Europe).
Yes Huns and Magyars although spoke Uralic languages , while migrating westwards must have intermixed with all Indo-european peoples on their way ( Scythian Alans , Ostrogoths , Slavs,... ) .
@@majidbineshgar7156 Initially, the Hungarians did not have a common language, some of the Hungarians spoke Ugric, some spoke Turkic They became completely Ugric-speaking when they settled in Europe; their nobility and rulers forgot the Turkic language
@@Scythian_nomad To certain extent I agree with you that Hun leaders according to Historians had East Asian features : " Most of the ancient descriptions of the Huns stress their strange appearance from a Roman perspective. These descriptions typically caricature the Huns as monsters. Jordanes stresses that the Huns were short of stature, had tanned skin and round and shapeless heads. Various writers mention that the Huns had small eyes and flat noses. The Roman writer Priscus gives the following eyewitness description of Attila: "Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his ( Mongoloid-Turkic) origin," but the bulk of their Army were composed of various ethnicities mainly Non-Turkic Caucasoid features, and subsequently Magyars have never identified themselves as related to Turkic peoples at all .
@@Scythian_nomad Before Magyars came to Hungary Hungarians spoke mostly Slavic languages similar to Slovenian and Bulgarian. Actually Slovenian and Bulgarian languages came from Hungary to the current locations.
If you think that the Hungarian language belongs to the Finno-Ugric language family, have you ever heard a Finnish person speak? They speak with a completely different accent. To imagine that a language can be separated from the accents and timbres associated with it is totally wrong. Spoken language is much more than what can be described with written signs. In fact, it is the smallest part of our communication. Metacommunication has a much bigger role. The melody of the Hungarian spoken language is closest to the melody of the Albanian language. Albanians also consider themselves Scythians.
I don’t think its accurate. Im from Southern Hungary and most of my friends have blue, brown or hazel eyes. My father has green eyes and my mother has brown eyes. I’ve got hazel eyes. That percentage is too high.
wow I didn't know that the Arpad dynasty carried the genetics of the Karachay Turks. R1a-z2123 %37 + g2a-p15 %31. "These people are distinguished by their excellent posture, expressive facial features, pleasant appearance and flexible body. I noticed that in this respect no other nation is so similar to the Hungarians as the Karachays and Digors, whom I met later in Nalchik... They speak the Tatar language and have the Mohammedan religion, which they profess as they please, with the exception of the youth, who scrupulously observe all the rites. I think it would not be difficult to make converts out of them." ( Hungarian Traveller Jean-Charles de Besse - Journey to the Crimea, the Caucasus, Georgia, Armenia, Asia Minor and Constantinople in the years 1829 and 1830. Chapter VIII. Paris, 1838 - translated from French by A. I. Petrov)
we hungarians originated from right here from the carpathian basin. tordos-vinca culture, avars, schytians, post ice age populations along with the serbs
In total, 46% of the world's population ( 3.2 billion people ) speaks an Indo-European language as a first language - by far the highest of any language family. There are about 445 living Indo-European languages, according to an estimate by Ethnologue, with over two-thirds ( 313 ) of them belonging to the Indo-Iranian branch. - wikipedia In 1583, English Jesuit missionary and Konkani scholar Thomas Stephens wrote a letter from Goa to his brother ( not published until the 20th century ) in which he noted similarities between Indian languages and Greek and Latin. - wikipedia In 1647, Dutch linguist and scholar Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn noted the similarity among certain Asian and European languages and theorized that they were derived from a primitive common language that he called Scythian. - wikipedia Marcus Zuërius van Boxhorn was one of the most important historical linguists. His Indo-Scythian theory laid the foundation for today's understanding of the Indo-European language family. - wikipedia Another early systematic attempt to prove the relationship between two languages on the basis of similarity of grammar and lexicon was made by the Hungarian János Sajnovics in 1770, when he attempted to demonstrate the relationship between Sami and Hungarian. - wikipedia That work was later extended to all Finno-Ugric languages in 1799 by his countryman Samuel Gyarmathi. János Sajnovics de Tordas et Káloz ( Tordas 1733 - 1785 ) was a Hungarian linguist and member of the Jesuit order. - wikipedia Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand -Périgord ( 1754 - 1838 ), 1st Prince of Benevento, then Prince of Talleyrand, was a French secularised clergyman, statesman and leading diplomat. After studying theology, he became Agent-General of the Clergy in 1780. - wikipedia According to tradition, when Napoleon ( 1769 - 1821 ) asked Francois Talleyrand what has since become a classic question about what to do with the Hungarians, Talleyrand is said to have replied simply: "Your Majesty! The Hungarians have an old habit of looking up to their elders and being proud of their past. Take it away the past of this people and you do with them what you want!"
You Hungarians are of Central Asian descent, close relatives to Kazahs, Turkmens, Uzbeks, Tajiks, etc., even your PM V. Orban attended a conference of those countries organized there, so not even Pannonia is your homeland, do yourselves a big favor and stop spreading here BS stories like these 😡😡
@@MihaiMustea-f6o YOU do yourself a favor and stop spreading BS about this. AVARS, trodos-vinca-scythians, post ice age population. You know despite you know NOTHINGabout the history of MAGYARS ( and HUNORS) you sure talk big. You dont even understand that the SECOND wave that came back to the carpathian basin had from a merged 7 tribes to begin with. All 7 tribes from different areas and directions...
Just to mention the fact a Hungarian King because the Saint Crown whenever can be East Roman Emperor,but a Roman Emperor never can become Hungarian King!!! Today if Hungary want again to become Kingdom they can make it without a King ,because the Saint Crown had the Saint Soul and is considered a person not an artefact.That Saint Crown giving divine security for all Central European nations not just for Hungary is a symbol of divine protectorate for Slovaks,Czeh,Polland,Serbians Austria,Moldova ,Romania and maybe more.That Crown had a power in past and have in our day too! This Crown united all of this nations under protectorate and not matter if they do it or not , all of this nations can protect the Crown too but Hungary was so many time alone in his fights saving European Culture in all history .Don't forget it !!!
@@katalinjuhasz641 Igazabol mindenki tudja aki kell es ezert is felnek egyes szomszedok,mert tudjak.Felnek,hogy ujra valtozas johet csak azt nem ,hogy mikor es milyen formaban.A Szent Koronanak mind a mai napig megvan a jelentosege,bar a mai fitalabb korosztaly nem foglalkozik vele,de ha megpillantjak akar a zaszlon,akar egy egyszeru rajzon,tudatalatt megdobban ra a szivuk anelkul ,hogy ertenek mi tortenik.Ezert eros ma is a Hit es az Egyhaz!
The Hungarians who conquered at the end of the 10. century were 10% of the local population. 60% of the conquering population were genetically similar to the Bashkirs and Volga Tatars (former Volga Bulgars) living today. Among the ancient archaeological cultures, they were genetically related to the OKUNEVO culture, Siberian Scythians (based on samples of bones from Scythians living in Tuva and present-day Kazakhstan), Scythians found in Pazyryk in the Altai Mountains, Sagly-Uyuk culture, Xiongnu culture found in western Mongolia. Hungarians considered themselves Scythians and Huns (Scythians among the Huns) according to our ancient chronicles. Video: ruclips.net/video/6tjGxX-4ZZA/видео.html time: 20:02.
6 месяцев назад
Interesting video. It was usual that nobility did not know borders.... I know far too little about classical music; when I was young, I was told "that was not for my kind"". Anybody can tell me name of this music?
Magyar mitológiában van egy DUL nevű fejedelem, akinek a lányait veszik el a HUNOR és MAGOR nevű testvérek. Tőlük származnak a hunok és magyarok. A történet helyszíne a Kaukázustól északra lévő terület. Genetikai vizsgálatot nem találtam a bolgár hódítókról. Genetikailag Árpád hódítói rokonságban állnak a mai baskírokkal és volgai bolgárokkal (tatárokkal).
Nothing new. Turkic people conquering new lands, mixing with the people of the conquered lands, eventually look like them while still maintaining the ruler statue. It has always been like that.
We wuz moravians,pannonians and shieeed..So many salty pan-slavists in the comments bruh stop capping pls. No we are not slavs thx we do not claim anything that is related to "slavness" not kolovrat, non sun worship, no "'Rus"-myth no dazbog etc. etc. We dont even claim Balkan smh. Also Béla has got probably nothing to do with the word bela-white. Béla means inner parts, intestines since our language is agglutinative and non indo-european it's obviously not it.
@@Фамилија-г3с Hunyadi János was not a Slav. He was Hungarian: “...Within the framework of Hungarian-Croatian international research, in 2021 the Hungarian Research Institute collected bone samples from the bone remains of János Corvin and Kristóf Corvin buried here from the Gothic Pauline monastery of Lepoglava in present-day Croatia in order to determine their genetic composition. This genetic information is crucial for identifying the remains of King Matthias Hunyadi, whose bones are scattered in the ossuary of Székesfehérvár, Hungary. Endre Neparáczki's team successfully identified the DNA profiles of the last two male members of the Hunyadi family using next-generation sequencing, the genetic result was published in 2022 in the highest-Q1 rating foreign Heliyon academic journal. The father-son relationship between the two Hunyadi descendants was confirmed. The paternal Y-chromosome of János Corvin and Kristóf Corvin is the Haplosome E1b1b1a1b1a6a1c∼ (E-BY4281), which is widespread in Eurasia. This haplogroup belongs to group E-V13, which is part of branch E-M78. Compared to ancient samples, the closest genetic correspondence with the paternal haplogroup of Hunyadi descendants is a sample from the Otrar-Karatau culture, the Iron Age Kazakh steppe, and a sample from medieval Sardinia. The closest ancient pattern matches from the Carpathian Basin were found with the paternal haplogroup of the Hunyadi family, an Avar pattern, an elite Hungarian conqueror pattern and a sample of a medieval Hungarian nobleman from the Royal Basilica of Székesfehérvár. János Corvin belongs to the mitochondrial haplogroup T2b, his maternal lineage is a haplogroup widespread throughout Eurasia. His son, Kristóf Corvinus, belongs to the rare mitochondrial haplogroup T2c1+146, his maternal lineage was already present in the Neolithic era in the area of today's Hungary, but it occurs most often in the Mediterranean region. The genetic origin of both maternal lines is consistent with the known ancestry of the mothers. Genetic analysis showed that János Corvin and Kristóf had an ancient European genome composition. Most of János Corvin's genome components have been present in the Carpathian Basin for thousands of years, the highest number of common genetic components are with European Neolithic samples and Hungarian Neolithic samples: the TransDanubian Polish culture, the Bodrogkeresztúr culture, the Kőrös culture, the lowland lined pottery culture. Kristóf Corvin's genome matches samples from the Croatian Copper Age Vučedol culture, which he received from his mother. Several statements have been made regarding the genetic identification of the Hunyadis. According to Gábor Horváth-Lugossy, then Director General of the Hungarian Research Institute, László Tamás Vizi, Deputy Director General for Scientific Affairs of the Institute, historian Csaba Hidán, and archaeogeneticist Endre Neparáczki, the centuries-old debate has been settled, with the fact that Hunyadi genetics are ancient from the Carpathian Basin, the results confirm the Hungarian position already represented, according to which János Hunyadi was of Hungarian origin…” Wiki
@@Фамилија-г3с As for people like Kossuth and Petőfi: When Hungary became muli ethnic (Ottoman invasions wiped a large chunk of the population), Maria-Theresia invited people from surrounding countries to settle at certain parts of the country. This is no secret. Many of our highly regarded national hero's and beloved historical figures are not Hungarian by blood, but because they FELT Hungarian, and PROCLAIMED THEMSELVES so, they were ACCEPTED as fully Hungarian. For example, Petőfi Sándor was Slovak origin and this is no secret, everyone knows in Hungary (well, the ones who payed attention in school do). In Hungary, as an adult, he became a poet. One of the most LOVED Hungarian poets. He proclaimed that he FELT and WANTED to become a Hungarian and then he changed his name from Petrovich to Petőfi. No one forced him to, it was his decision. "..Petőfi was born on the New Year's morning of 1823, in the town of Kiskőrös, Kingdom of Hungary. The population of Kiskőrös was predominantly of Slovak origin as a consequence of the Habsburgs' reconstruction policy designed to settle, where possible, non-Hungarians in areas devastated during the Turkish wars.[4] His birth certificate, in Latin, gives his name as "Alexander Petrovics",[2][3] where "Alexander" is the Latin equivalent of the Hungarian "Sándor". His father, István (Stephanus) Petrovics, was a village butcher, innkeeper and he was A SECOND GENERATION Serb[5][6][7] or Slovak[1][8][9] IMMIGRANT to the Great Hungarian Plain.[10] [a] Mária Hrúz, Petőfi's mother, was a servant and laundress before her marriage. She was of Slovak descent and spoke Hungarian with something of an accent.[14][15] Petőfi's parents first met in Maglód, married in Aszód and moved to Kiskőrös a year before the birth of the poet.[4] The family lived for some time in Szabadszállás, where his father owned a slaughterhouse. Within two years, the family moved to Kiskunfélegyháza, and Petőfi always viewed the city as his true home..." Wiki
@@Фамилија-г3с "...Today, schools, streets and squares are named after him throughout Hungary and Hungarian-speaking regions of neighbouring states; in Budapest alone, there are 11 Petőfi streets and 4 Petőfi squares, see: Public place names of Budapest. A national radio station (Radio Petőfi), a bridge in Budapest and a street in Sofia, Bulgaria also bear his name, as well as the asteroid 4483 Petöfi, a member of the Hungaria family. Every Hungarian primary school child learns some of his poems by heart. The Hungarian 10 Forint banknote valid between 1947 and 1992 depicted Sándor Petőfi on the obverse. Petőfi has a larger than life terra cotta statue near the Pest end of Erzsébet Bridge, sculpted by Miklós Izsó and Adolf Huszár [hu]. Similar Petőfi statues were established in many other cities, as well, during the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century..." Wiki
@@Фамилија-г3с So what did the Slovaks or Czechs do? "In 1911, a statue of Sándor Petőfi was erected in Pressburg (Pozsony, present-day Bratislava), on the Main Square. In 1918, after the army of the newly independent First Czechoslovak Republic occupied the city, the statue was dynamited.[20][21] After this sculpture was boarded over round temporarily until its removal, and replaced with a statue of Slovak poet Pavol Országh Hviezdoslav.[22] Today, there is a statue of Petőfi in the Medic Garden (Medická záhrada).[23]" Wiki Might I add the so called Slovak poet, that was erected in place of Petőfi's statue has one Hungarian name too = Országh which means Country in old Hungarian. ;)
The Magyar language predates the arrival of the Arpad era in 895AD. It was already present during and before the Roman empire for thousands of years. That is why, it is an island within the IndoEuropean sea of languages in present day Europe. (not because it was brought there by the arrival of Árpád and his people's, - who were simply returning to their ancestral homeland from Asia and thus spoke the same language as the local population,- who welcomed them as liberators from their Frankish and Bulgarian oppressors-)
@@florinwlad4434 Ammianus Marcellinus wrote that he wanted to welcome the Sarmatians as obedient subjects of the Roman emperor. The name "obedient subject" did not please one of the Sarmatians, who pulled off his boots and threw them at the emperor, shouting the words "MARHA MARHA". The word MARHA in Hungarian means cattle and fool.
How can you do a video about Magyars and not learn how to pronounce it first?! Seriously. Edit: the way to pronounce the gy in Magyar is pretty much identical to the way the d is pronounced in the English word dew.
Name Magyar is derived from ancient name of Southern Ural & Southern Volga region; Magog. According to old Assyrian & Persian sources. And also biblical history too.
Amazing job as always bro, hope to see if it is possible a video about Mountain Caucasian Jews sample, Earlier Kurds, Lurs, Earlier Korean Peninsula people, Avar people (from Dagestan), Tat people (north Iran), Laz people (Turkiye), Khazars (Turkic people), Yayoi people (Japan)
Bashkir DNA is 44.2% Indo-European from the steppes, 23.6% Nganasan (indigenous Siberian), 15.8% Han Chinese (East Asian), 1.6% WHG, 1.4% Levant, 0.6% Taforaf, 0.4% LapaDosantos_9600BP
@@gulnaragalyautdinova3635G25 data. We can observe that the main Bashkir dna is Steppe, a very characteristic dna of Northern Europeans, it also has typical Finn-Ugric dna, Nganasan is the most characteristic dna, in addition to that it has East Asian dna. It has almost no European Hunter Gatherer DNA and no Anatolian DNA, which are very characteristic of Europeans, and it also has a small affinity towards Ancient North Africans and South American Natives. The genetic history of Bashkirs, Mezhovskaya and Nganasan mix, giving rise to Proto Ugors, these mix again with the Ancient Sarmatians and Xiangnu Empire.
We discriminate against each other just look at the voting in the Eurovision contest 😂 and yet history has mixed us up like the minestrone soup,a bit of everything
@@barguttobed They're reference populations, surely the Buryat (a Mongol sub-ethnicity in what is now Siberia, Russia) and Koreans represent the Turkic/Hunnic ancestry.
@@LuisAldamizANE is not a Phantom component, it is a real and completely measured component unlike Basal Eurasian, the child of Mal'Ta Buret and Anfotova Gora are two 100% pure Individuals, and their paternal and maternal Haplogroups influenced the majority of Eurasians , in variable frequencies, with the Indigenous Siberians and the Natives of the Americas having the highest percentage, in the Ket and the South Americans it reaches 45% and in the Finn-Ugric peoples of Western Siberia, the Komi, the Sami it arrives in 30%
@@LuisAldamizThe Basal Eurasian component is very different, we do not have a pure component, it is not easy to follow their Haplogroups either, there is a lack of information, ANE is a very different fact, we have their original DNA and we have Haplogroups of all the lineages with which we can trace where ANE came from and what group they influenced, ANE was predominantly early Western Eurasian mixed with 1/5 early East Eurasian, the modern Siberian Indigenous and South American Natives, the largest amount comes from the Northeast, that is why they are closer to the Eurasian of the This, however, are also the ones that have the most ANE.
My father is 50/50 Frisian (mom) and Hungarian (dad) , my mother is 100% Czech.. i have black hair, light blue eyes and almost Asian eye shape... im proud to be Magyar, but i think im a bit of everything between Friesland and the Ural😂😂😂😂
hungarian,austrian,slovaks,croats dnas are very similar but today hungarians have 4% asian dna from conquer magyars, and your eyes probably from jasz or kun people
@@latakicsi2183 Kun people are Cuman and Jasz are Jassi (Scythians). If they are the Asian Schytians it could be, but if they are the Western Schythians then not.
The Hungarians who conquered at the end of the 10. century were 10-15% of the local population. 60% of the conquering population were genetically similar to the Bashkirs and Volga Tatars (former Volga Bulgars) living today. Among the ancient archaeological cultures, they were genetically related to the OKUNEVO culture, Siberian Scythians (based on samples of bones from Scythians living in Tuva and present-day Kazakhstan), Scythians found in Pazyryk in the Altai Mountains, Sagly-Uyuk culture, Xiongnu culture found in western Mongolia. Hungarians considered themselves Scythians and Huns (Scythians among the Huns) according to our ancient chronicles. Video: ruclips.net/video/6tjGxX-4ZZA/видео.html time: 20:02.
Uralic Fino-Ugric people are European and always were though, yes they are from various areas of Eastern Europe and Eurasia and have a little bit of East Asian heritage too.
Is Ural Mountains in Central Asia? No. It is very, very, very… Western Asia, the border between Europe and Asia. Bašhkirs who live in Urals, live in rather Western Eurasia. I think there is rather big missunderstanding about the genetics of Europe and Western Eurasia. No of the language groups are genetically ”pure”.
"Uralic" derives from Urals of course but it's a linguistic term. The Uralics were originally an East Asian people who became Siberian specialists after the last glacial maximum (i.e. after c. 20,000 BP), reaching Europe c. 10,000 BP and as such are actually the oldest surviving ethnolinguistic family of Europe but still not fully from Europe because of their East Asian and Siberian roots, which still manifest in their genetics (notably Y-DNA N1). Now, the Siberian Uralics (Ugrics and Nganassan) had intense interaction with Indo-Aryans prior to their migration to South Asia, although they may have been in the bad side of Iranics (Scythians and the like) later on. This is apparent for example in the archaeogenetics of Altai but also in those of the current main Ugric homeland in West Siberia, and it's also apparent in greater Uralic influence in Indo-Aryan than in other Inodeuropean languages AFAIK. In any case, there was never a hard line between the steppe (dominated by Indoeuropeans until the arrival of the Turks/Huns) and the taiga (dominated by Uralics and other taiga specialist peoples, incl. for a time probably the Tungusic, etc.) and both "specialist" populations have at times overflowed their specialist niches into the others'. Magyars just became steppe specialists, and admixed probably with other steppe specialists (Turkics, Inodeuropeans) before feeling the Khazar push and deciding it was worthy to conquer the Bulgarian Pannonia and establish there their homeland and base for further raids.
Hungarians are very closely related to Bashkir Turks, this is not a Turk, but it is certain that there is an affinity with the Turks, even in Hungarian there are a lot of Western Turkic words and none of them are borrowed because they are from the Pre-Hungarians Of course, it is more common in the scientific community that they are from the Finno-Ugric peoples, but this does not make any sense in my opinion, because if they are from the Finno-Ugric family, then it is impossible for them to be descendants of the Scythians-Huns.
The Hungarians as descendants of the Scythians, the Huns is an invention of the feudal church intended to provide the royal family with prestigious ancestors. It is based only on Greek, Latin-Germanic written sources, the Bible; and not a popular tradition! As you say, the words borrowed from the Turkish language are of Western types... wich means that the Hungarians do not come from Central Asia but somewhere between the Black Sea and the Urals!
That's correct, Hungarians are NOT descendants of Scythians or Huns, the Huns were a separate tribe, sharing with the Hungarians the same non-European origin.
@@belagyanta7 My Hungarian friends generally deny this, in terms of genotype and phenotype, the probability of being Germans is almost impossible, Germanic and Hungarian tribes are not the same.
@@Khorasan_Turco where did i say that the ancient Hungarians and Germans were the same thing? Of course they aren't. On the other, those of today... it's another story!
Bashkirs themselves are an assimilated Eastern European population, by a Turkic nomad elite. By the time the Magyars reached central Europe they acquired already many East European types of people. Genetically they were no longer Uralic or Turkic, but majority East European.
G25 data. Bashkirs dna 44.2% Indo-European Steppe, 23.6% Nganasan (Indigenous Siberian), 15.8% Chinese Han, (East Asia), 1.6% WHG, 1.4% Levant, 0.6% Taforat, 0.4% LapaDosantos_9600BP. We can observe that the main Bashkir dna is Steppe, a very characteristic dna of Northern and Eastern Europeans, it also has typical Finn-Ugric dna, Nganasan is the most characteristic dna, in addition to that it has East Asian dna. It has almost no European Hunter Gatherer DNA and no Anatolian DNA, which are very characteristic of the main European components, and it also has a small affinity towards the Levant, Ancient North Africans and South American Natives. From a historical genetic perspective, Mezhovskaya and Nganasan merge, giving rise to Proto Ugors, Early Sarmatians mix with Ugors, mix with Xiangnu Empire, then there is a genetic flow from Hunnic Empire, multiple waves mixed from Eastern Europe and Asia, although They have always been a mix of Asians and Europeans.
In fact, data from this cycle of papers say that the Bashkirs have an average of about 60% Western Eurasian and 40% Eastern Eurasian origin, inherited from their Hunnic ancestors. And their neighbors - the Volga Tatars, have on average about 80% Western and 20% Eastern Eurasian origin, inherited from the Scytho-Sarmatian ancestors. Anthropologically, the Siberian Tatars and Teleuts, as well as some of the Bashkirs, are close to the Pazyryk Scythians. Thus, the deep ancient ANE-Yamnaya-Sintashta-like pedigree is preserved there. To speak as if it were strange that the Arpads were able to create a flourishing state when the barbaric capital Bilyar of the proto-Tatars was less than Rome, but more than London and Paris of that time. Cities were built taking into account the relief and water supply. And the Bulgar-Kipchak Tatar languages dominated Asia and Europe before they were devastated by invasions from the west and east.
Cope and seethe bro, but the truth is that only the pure ANA Nivkhs Nanai are the OG World Masterrace gigachads with highest testo, ANE-mixed Siberians came on the second place. And the rest of the world for the most are just regular PNJs with no accomplishments.
The Hungarians who conquered at the end of the 10. century were 10-15% of the local population. 60% of the conquering population were genetically similar to the Bashkirs and Volga Tatars (former Volga Bulgars) living today. Among the ancient archaeological cultures, they were genetically related to the OKUNEVO culture, Siberian Scythians (based on samples of bones from Scythians living in Tuva and present-day Kazakhstan), Scythians found in Pazyryk in the Altai Mountains, Sagly-Uyuk culture, Xiongnu culture found in western Mongolia. Hungarians considered themselves Scythians and Huns (Scythians among the Huns) according to our ancient chronicles. Video: ruclips.net/video/6tjGxX-4ZZA/видео.html time: 20:02.
Alapvetően azt mondta, hogy a Bélai DNS megegyezik a mai magyarokéval, de az Árpád-házat közép-ázsiai eredetűnek találta. A Belas haplocsoport a h1b, amelyen Beethoven osztozik
Their "original homeland" as far as we know was Ukraine, where they suffered pressure from the Khazars (in what is now Southern Russia), thus they decided to invade parts of Bulgaria (which then reached to Central Hungary but also bordered the ancestral Magyar country by Moldova) and won.
It's Corded Ware (early Western Indoeuropeans, from which derive Balto-Slavics but also Celto-Italics, Germanics and surely also Greco-Armenians via the Vucedol offshoot) but it's also present in Central Asia since the Afanasevo culture (proto-Tocharians surely, another branch of early Indoeuropean expansion). In other regions like South Asia R1a is probably from Neolithic origin instead (Elamo-Dravidian or whatever). Just because you have a distant paternal ancestor some 12,000 years ago it doesn't mean your specific branch is the ancestor.
@@leotka - Polish are rather in the 50% and Czechs may have even higher frequencies, while Corded Ware and successor burials in that area were almost totally 100% R1a, which speaks volumes about R1a being not specifically "Slavic" but broadly Indoeuropean, at least in Europe (Asian R1a may be from Neolithic migrations instead, care should be placed on which subclade it belongs to). But broadly speaking you're right on point.
R1a (M420), predates the existence of the Slavs, possibly EHG or ANE were the first to spread them, Haplogroups R1a Z82 and R1 Z93 are associated with the expansion of the Slavs.
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d R1a spread from West Asia (Iran-Kurdistan, secondarily Turkey) and did so in a Neolithic timeline. However it was later adopted in Europe by the early Indoeuropeans and became their signature (a specific subclade probably originating in Ukraine). As the North Slavs today occupy an area largely similar to that of Corded Ware, they have inherited those typical Indoeuropean lineages, albeit diluted.
Most populations generally stayed where their ancestors lived, while languages, customs, and beliefs shift overtime. Also, ruling elites across the world exhibit way more mobility and intermixing than your average peasant.
A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations „The rise and fall of the Roman Empire was a socio-political process with enormous ramifications for human history. The Middle Danube was a crucial frontier and a crossroads for population and cultural movement. Here we present genome-wide data from 136 Balkan individuals dated to the 1st millennium CE. Despite extensive militarization and cultural influence, we find little ancestry contribution from peoples of Italic descent. However, we trace a large-scale influx of people of Anatolian ancestry during the Imperial period. Between ~250-550 CE, we detect migrants with ancestry from Central/Northern Europe and the steppe, confirming that “barbarian” migrations were propelled by ethnically diverse confederations. Following the end of Roman control, we detect the large-scale arrival of individuals who were genetically similar to modern Eastern European Slavic-speaking populations, who contributed 30-60% of the ancestry of Balkan people, representing one of the largest permanent demographic changes anywhere in Europe during the Migration Period.” The major genetic impact of Slavic migrations is visible not only in current Balkan Slavic-speaking populations, but also in places that today do not speak Slavic languages such as Romania and Greece," said co-senior author David Reich, professor of genetics in the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School and professor of human evolutionary biology in Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
It is not likely that he inherited any of the Croatian genes, since the Croats were a conquered people without respectable nobility. His grandmother Jelena/Ilona was a daughter of Uroš I of Rascia.
Ammianus Marcellinus wrote that he wanted to welcome the Sarmatians as obedient subjects of the Roman emperor. The name "obedient subject" did not please one of the Sarmatians, who pulled off his boots and threw them at the emperor, shouting the words "MARHA MARHA". The word MARHA in Hungarian means cattle and fool.
Slavs from Belarus migrated to Lower Austria and the Pannonian Plain before the Magyars came. These Slavs- the Slovaks and Slovenians mixed with the older inhabitants which carried the Danubian DNA of the Ancient Veneti - 1200 BC and the Boii and Carni Celts which came 700 years later in 500 BC and carried the R1b DNA.The Magyars displaced these mixed peoples and took Central Hungary and took the wives of these people who had settled in Hungary previously and surrounded the Inner Core of Magyars. Surprisingly the Magyars co existed peacefully with these people and even adopted their religion. Hungary was the most democratic country in the Middle Ages in Europe and Serfdom was never incorporated.The Magyars always regarded themselves as free people and the leader ruled by example and not by force.
In fact, the story was much darker : the Hungarians were forcibely converted to Catholicism and a feudal system by King Stephen with the support of German knights. From free riders that they were, they became the serfs of the kingdom; considered not to be part of the nation! Only a small part of these rose to a rank called "common nobles" for having distinguished themselves on the battlefield!
R1A is a representative Slavic Haplogroup, along with I2a2 Dinaric haplogroup which is even older. Why are you saying that this R1A is confirming Asian origin from Volga when it doesn't ? This is only proof that Huns and Magyars created a state with major Slavic tribes. Of course he was R1a as most of modern Hungarians look exactly the same as other Slavs. Before Huns, there was Velika Moravia state of Slavs that originates from Serbs.
Not all R1a lineages are Slavic. It's most prevalent among Eastern Iranics, Indics, and Slavs. In fact, the R1a-Z93 subclade, carried by Béla III, belongs to the Indo-Iranian (main Asian) branch of R1a, not the Slavic branch (M458, Z280).
R Q N - these are East Asian male chromosomes that originated 60 thousand years ago. The fact that some late Slavs multiplied the mutation of this sex chromosome does not mean at all that there are no more ancient races and peoples.
terroruzzians spoke finno-hungarian tongues 150 years ago and even till 1920's, when soviets decided to make all the people living in ruzzian federation ssr 'russkies', so they genocided some of them, the others were driven to new places, where genocide of Slavs was made (Ukraine, for example) and we have 'russkies', who take Ukrainian language, its grammar and add some words from finno-hungaric languages. If someone doesn't believe, you may read ruzzian empire officers' memoirs, where they hate those moksha people, erzya, chud, mordva, ves for their unability to speak so-called 'velikoruzzian' language. Actually, the aristocracy of ruzzian (moscovian) empire were from Tatar or German and ruzzian language was made as Lingua Franca from Ukrainian language (grammar, 30% of vocabulary), Tatar (partially, wordbuilding, upto 65% of vocabulary), French (scientific terms or the things non-existent in moscovia, such as balcony, somewhere 5%). And it was made by a Ukrainian priest from Kyiv-Mohyla Academy named Feofan Prokopovych. You can find it on any web resource, if you check, being a smart being.
In the 10th century, 6% of the population of the Hungarian Principality was of Manysik genetics. Professor Mario Alinei had already predicted that this would be the case. He considered the Etruscan language to be an ancient version of the Hungarian language. 6% immigrants certainly could not have spread a new language here.
I have read many expert statements that MyHeretage's analyses are highly biased and unreliable. I recommend using other sources. By the way, the Bashkir people are Turkic and speak Turkish. Baskhkir=Baş Kurt in Turkish, it means Head/Chief Wolf.
На Кавказе, у подножия Эльбруса живёт народ, мужская гаплогруппа которого так же R1a..z93..z2123 - это карачаево-балкарцы. Они тюрки, язык которых лингвистами признан, как более древний, чем все древнеписьменные тюркские языки, они абсолютные европеоиды, традиционные виды сельского хозяйства - отгонное животноводство и переработка продукции животноводства, имеются собственные породы лошадей, овец, собак. Территория расселения карачаево-балкарцев изобилует древностями от бронзового века до средневековья, а именно до конца 14 века, когда население было почти полностью уничтожено армией Тамерлана. Так же неподалеку археологами раскопан древний город Маджар, разрушенный войском Тамерлана.
My dna test says im a direct descendant of King Bela III and the Hunyadi Dynasty, which is where my Scythian and Beethoven DNA is also from. Now it makes sense. Ive been trying to follow this trail forever. This video helped, Thank you. Great video.
The genetic line of III. King Béla confirms the Hungarian chronicles, according to which the Hungarians and the Árpád dynasty are of Scythian-Hun origin. The R1a-Arp lineage is the most common in individuals recovered from Scythian and Hun cemeteries.
Scythian - yes, Hunnic - no. I had whole genome sequencing done and had my DNA compared to more than 500 ancient samples. Had this done for my parents and one grandmother as well. Turns out me, my father and his mother are all extremely close matches with King Béla III and King Ladislaus I. We're all exclusively European, just like the DNA of Béla and Ladislaus. Scythians were Europeans and so was the Árpád dynasty. The Hun origin story with Attila is a fairy tale, probably to claim superiority.
@@narc0polo966 A recent big genetic research from the Hun graves in Mongolia a few years ago. According to the results, the Hun graves found in the eastern part of present-day Mongolia had Mongoloid features, while the Hun graves found in the western part of Mongolia were European. In addition, a mixture of Sarmatian and BMAC was also found among the Huns. So it is a misconception that the Huns were purely Mongoloids or Europids. This is also the case with the Scythians, there is also admixture. It is interesting that the Eastern Scythians have the largest Europid mark while the Western Scythians have the largest Mongoloid admixture. In summary, the Scythians and the Huns were genetically mixed, including Mongoloid and European and their mixture. It is also a misconception that the Scythians spoke an Indo-European language, since no linguistic memory was left behind, this is just a hypothesis that serves to justify the superiority of the Westerners. It was recently identified by the Hungarians3. king Aba Sámuel's DNA, which belongs to haplo N1, the closest ancient DNA of which was found in a Hun grave in Mongolia, so the Hungarians' Hun origin is not a myth. The Hungarians are of Scythian and Hun origin, as there is overlap between them.
@@laszlokovacs8086 What exactly do you mean when you say "Mongoloid features"? The Scythians for example were European, no surprise, they lived in Europe. The tribes further east of the black sea were not considered Scythian by the Greek. It's a modern idea that these people were also Scythian and we need to reject it. DNA shows us it's not true. Scythians lived in modern Moldova, Ukraine, Romania and Hungary. 95% of my ancestors during the Iron Age were in fact Scythians who lived (and died) there. The Árpáds didn't come from anywhere else than there. There might have been some added touches through marriages, rapes, infidelity and so on but the majority of the DNA profile of King Béla III and King Ladislaus I is in fact of this Central European origin.
@@narc0polo966 I don't think so, the Greeks wrote a lot of truth, but also a lot of mistakes about the Scythians.. The Scythians are not a genetic group, but a civilization or culture, the essence of which is the steppe lifestyle and religion of horse archers and the ancient legal system. I would like to know what haplogroup your ancestors belong to, based on which you consider them Scythians? Also, I would like to know which of the nations alive today he thinks has the greatest Scythian heritage genetically?
@@laszlokovacs8086 I'm not basing it on haplogroups only. As mention before, I had whole genome sequencing done and then had my DNA compared to more than 5000 samples from archeological sites.
Modern nations don't really share one common ancient heritage. It's all mixed up after migrations, invasions, conquests and other events. The closest modern populations to me are: Austrian, Czech, East German, South Dutch, North German, Hungarian, German Central and Southwest Finnish but none of them are very close to me genetically. Modern nations are much more genetically diverse than ancient populations.
My father shares a lot of identified DNA segments with Béla III and also with samples from the Copper Age found in Bohemia and Germany. And a lot with samples from modern Ukraine and Hungary, Scythians and Goths at the time. I can tell you the closest modern and ancient populations to the DNA of Béla III, if you're interested. I spent a lot of money on this "hobby".
Bela III also came close to becoming Emperor of Byzantium (Basileus ton Rhomaion - Roman Emperor). Emperor Manuel I Komnenos of Byzantium, was himself half-Arpad, his mother the Empress Irene/Piroska was the daughter of King Ladislaus I of Hungary. Being without a son, Manuel invited Bela, then a prince, to Constantinople, renamed him Alexios, created him Despotes (the second highest rank to the emperor), betrothed him to his daughter and named him his heir apparent. If Manuel had not produced a son and heir late in his reign, Alexios II Komnenos, the personal union of the Byzantine Empire and Hungary under Bela might have drastically changed history. On the death of Stephen III of Hungary, Manuel's influence ensured that Bela succeeded him as king.
@tongobong1 Slav-Slöwen language originates from the area southern of Caucasian where vowelless languages have developed and Hungarian-Macar-Scythians have no Indo-Iranian a Slave genetics .
Western Scythians where a Finno-Ugric alliance meaning Finnish-Hungarian while Eastern a more Turkic hence none where Indo-Iranian or Indo-Jewropean.
Not even Roman called themselves or the surrounding people or land on this continent Jewropean and thats not because they didn't mixed with Jew-Jewnanistani-SeaPeople but simply because they knew that such identity is foreign on this continent.
Even Deutsch call Hungarians as German in form of UnGar and not themselves similarly to other groups since UGar,UnGar,InGar,HonGri,VenGri,WanGer...OnoGuri are all by which others people call Hungarians.
Hungarian King Béla 3rd simply got rebranded as Jewnanistani King Alexios together with the entire Cuman-Coman Byzantine dynasty and everything Hungarian-Macar-Scythian.
wow
So cool
Wonderful documentation! Thank you for the video!
We feel friendly personality to Hungarians. From S.Korea
Genetic results prove that today's Hungarians are the AVAR and HUN peoples who lived in the territory of today's Mongolia, from where they were culturally connected with the Korean peninsula, distance was not an obstacle. Hello from Hungary.
@@sandors.5526And where are those „results“? Everything points rather to them being A Ugro-Saramtian mix from bashkortostan. (kusnarenkovo/Sargat culture)
yes , once i worked in budapest for a period of time. the hungarian people are very mild, good breeding and polite.
@@sandors.5526q Зашто онда немате азијске црте лица?
Невероватно колико се одупирете да будете оно што у ствари јесте, у основи Словени.
@@Фамилија-г3с For a simple reason: Hungarians are not slavs.
I m Spaniard, and descendant of king Bella III of Hungary, as descendant of the kings of Aragon. Some Doctor on history from the University of Madrid made an investigation about my ancestors that took 25 years. I have to tell you that hundreds of people are descendants of Bella III in the provinces of Madrid and Segovia, and I guess thousands of Spaniards.
Looks like we’re distant cousins then! I am a descendant of James I of Aragon and Violant of Hungary. On mytrueancestry my dna matches with the same hablogroup found in the remains of Prince Andrew who was Bela III’s grandson and Violant’s half-brother.
I have Visigoth roots from Spain. After seeing your comment that made more sense. Because my closest genetic matches are relatively far away from Spain. Like outlier one from all close genetic data. My genetic data matched with King Bela III and King Ladislaus I. You can also find my partially detailed ancestry in the comment section. Thank you, and have a great day cousin 😅
@@Occitan1420 Sajnos nem igaz! Mivel a megtalált csontváz HIVATALOS mérései közben 21 cm-el nőt.Ki tudja kiét vizsgálták DNS alapján.
@@istvansovari4208 I understand what you mean but I wouldn’t assume that’s it not true because of that. I’m not saying it’s true either but according to the mytrueancestry website they were able to identify that it was András because of the artifacts next to his resting place. Not to mention the remains carried the same R1a1a1b2a2a1 hablogroup found in III. Béla and 1. László. So even if it happens not to be András, the remains discovered were from a member of the Árpád dynasty. I am descended from the Árpád dynasty through my 9th great grandmother Mildred Reade (Warner). Mildred happens to be Elizabeth the II’s 8th great grandmother and George Washington’s great grandmother.
@@istvansovari4208 Fordítót terveztem használni, de a fordítás pontatlannak tűnt. Haha
I do have DNA match with him :-) from the caucasian side.
At the beginning of the video we are told that Hungarian belongs to the Finno-Ugric language family and we see a map. There is no nation on the map who we can understand a little bit of what it says... I say this as a Hungarian who travels a lot to the East.
NINCS FINNUGOR SZÁRMAZÁS,,,,,KELET SZKITIA
Basically a modern day Hungarian then in autosomal DNA. The Magyars had been in the Carpathian Basin for about three centuries by the time he was born, I guess it makes sense. Very interesting analysis.
Magyars left very few genes in modern Hungarians. Modern Hungarians are Slavs that replaced their Slavic language with Magyar.
@@tongobong1 Modern Hungarians are basically the same as the bronze age inhabitants. The genome was mostly identical with the past 3500 years. Nothing slavic... Rather the slavs have also a huge number of aboriginal preindoeuropean DNA.
@@xerxen100 Modern Hungarians are totally different from bronze age inhabitants. Don't you know that many nations came to Hungary in the past 3500 years?
@@tongobong1 But none of them no exterminated the locals completly, not to mention that the locals and Hungarians speaked a very similar language. Enough just seeing the Dacian Gold tresures and the Hungarian ones. Almost identicals.
@@tongobong1more Germans than slavs. at least in the cities and towns.
Royalty was quite "diverse" even in that day, as they regularly married foreigners in order to fulfil certain political goals.
Béla's mother was Euphrosine of Kiev, her paternal grandmother, Helena of Serbia. His grandfather was Álmos (not the tribal chief, but the son of Géza I, of the same name), whose wife was Predslava of Kiev. Álmos' own mother was Sophia of Loon, who hailed from current-day Belgium.
It is really not that surprising that Béla's maternal genetic heritage looks quite "European" 🙃
Following this line, he was first betrothed to Maria Komnene, daughter of the Byzantine emperor Manuel Komnenos, but when that felt through, he married Agnes of Antioch, also known as Anna oh Châtillon, the daughter of the infamous crusader and robber baron Raynald of Châtillon. When she died, Béla married Margaret of France, the daughter of Louis VII.
Kyiv not "kiEv"
1
Etruscan: an archaic form of Hungarian
(book summary)
by Mario Alinei www.continuitas.org/texts/alinei_etruscan.pdf
@@IvanaKupala Kőív
@@IvanaKupala Kiev eredeti neve. KŐ.MAGYARUL.MI alapítottuk.
@istvansovari4208 Kyiv as per UN geographic guidelines. Your spelling is irrelevant dear.
Southern Polish from my mother.. did a test on Uncle to find out a little mystery with my Grandfather.. R1a and apparently not subclades of the West Slavs and we have a link with Arpad.
I had a friend in the States who was ethnically Polish, and had always identified that way (his place of birth and rearing was the Chicago area), but genetic testing also indicated he had some Hungarian heritage as well.
@@barrymoore4470 That's cool. Yeah there's a saying in Hungarian... Lengyel, Magyar két jó barát - and in Polish - Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki.. Full version meaning - Pole and Hungarian brothers be,
good for fight and good for party.
Both are valiant, both are lively,
Upon them may God's blessings be.
@@shaolindreams My friend enthusiastically embraced his Hungarian ancestry, while still taking pride in his Polish roots. It's good to know there is this long-standing rapport between the two peoples.
@@barrymoore4470 I feel the same way as your friend. It's kinda amazing what you can find out today. Long live the brothers and sisters! Thanks for your comments.
@@barrymoore4470Polish doesn't have a meaning in Polish language whose genetics does show them being a Indo-Iranian hence since Hungarian call then Lengyel a leAnGelic people which is what Hungarian-Macar-Scythian are most Polish are very much Hungarian.
R-Z645 CARPATHIAN BASIN BC 3900 NEOLITIC FARMERS, R-Z93 MOLDOVA BC 3000 LATE TRYPILLIA, R-Z2123 BACTRIA BC 2300 BMAC, R-SUR51 XIONGNU - VOLGA-URAL HUNS , R-ARP5 CARPATHIAN BASIN (HUN REALM). THE MTDNA N1A1A1A1 HAVE SAME ROOTS.
My ancestors are Turkish from Bulgaria. I did a DNA test and my DNA matched with King Ladislaus I, King Bela III, Johannes Corvinus, and Christopher Corvinus. My haplogroup is also R1a from Central Asia(R-S23592, 1 delta away from Arpad haplogroup). I am not a direct descendant of course but they're my relatives. Also from the Rurik Dynasty, I matched with Gleb Svyatoslavich and Dmitry Alexandrovich. I have Hungarian, Ukrainian-Russian. Swedish, Irish, Maltese-Sicilian-Italian, Lithuanian, Romanian, and of course Turkish roots. R.I.P my uncle Bela III.
Good Research work Brother.
I’m from Italy.
@marcosaronni6105 Thank you,, brother 😅. I thought I wrote but while arranging grammar I think I deleted it accidentally. I have Italian roots. I edited and added Italian after Sicilian which is very important. I have a connection with the House of Manfredini also. Amo così tanto l'Italia. 🇮🇹
Gleb Svjatoslavović was a White Croat..
Turkish is just cultural identity just like Chinese and Indian, when it comes to actual ancestry then it's very complicated unlike people like Japanese or Korean as their ancestry is very straight forward not complex. Turkish, Greek, Italian and Spaniards etc.. are not homogenous people - they have very complex ethnic make up
@@maximus5122 According to the illustrativedna site, the closest ethnicity is Ukrainian (Lviv), and the distance is 3.086.
I wonder how far should we go back in time to find a Hungarian with significant Central Asian or Finnish/Inuit dna
Just before 955 ! After that NO Magyar male survived the genocid from Lechfeld.
@perseus274OP isn't talking about haplogroups.
Back then, till the Chine great wall, only white eastern europens lived. This is why you cant find significant asian ancestry even in the Avar khaganate peoples DNA (max 20%). Shortly, they were just came back home.
10th century remains were already analyzed. they were already mixed back then showing more European but def. some Eastern (Asian?) remains. Bottom line they already spent hundreds of yrs in Europe freely mixing w locals
Finnish/Inuit? LOL. I'm hoping you meant something like Finnish/Lapp (Sami/Sámi, in Finnic it's much more simmilar).
Anyway, the closest linguistic relatve to Hungarian are not Finnish or the like but rather the Ugrics of West Siberia: the Khanty and the Mansi. However the Magyars had been roaming the European steppe for some time before being pushed by the Khazars into migrating to Pannonia, and even before that we know that the Indo-Iranics had intense interaction with the Uralics of NW Asia. All this probably explains his Central Asian R1a paternal ancestry.
As for the rest, it's probably admixture in Eastern Europe first and in Central Europe later. Early Magyars were infamous for their massive raids in Germany and Italy and even further west all the way to Catalonia, in which they pillaged many slaves, notably women (killing all the men, the kids and the elderly and only bringing young women as captives, in one instance naked and tied to each other by the hair reportedly, was common practice of the pre-Christian Hungarians and it may explain their unusuall genetic westernness in their geographic context).
Very good work, greeting from Hungary.
My ancestor, since I descend from Violant of Hungary , his granddaughter and mother-in-law of Alfonso X the wise
How can you even know? Have you even heard of cuckolding, adoption and pedigree collapse even? If people so old left any descendant, then we all descend from them one way or another, every single European is related to any other European at timeline of c. 1000 years ago, and Alfonso is almost that old.
Some Scythian symbols in the Hungarian tradition. Four lilies around the sun on the Solti hair braid and Scythian carpet. Heart-shaped lily on Scythian carpet and Hungarian beads. Tulip with a seed in the abdomen on Scythian jewellery, on a Sarkad bracelet and in Hungarian folk art. Bird with beak in contact with its breast on Scythian, Reformed and even Catholic churches, and on embroidery from Raba. Antlers ending in a lily on Hungarian salt cellars and on Scythian tattoos in Paziriki. Burning antlered deer on the Scythian horn of the Green Phalompusta, in the legend of the miraculous deer of St. László of Vác. In the legendary hymn, the miraculous stag also has burning antlers! In the Paziriki carpet, the boy who became a deer also appears. Turul, or griffin, above the stag, from the Scythian medieval church of Székesfehérvár, on a stone carving of an arched doorway, on a railing of a sanctuary in Zalavaro. Eagle's head with ears in Scythian, Avar, monastery excavated in Bélapátfalva. Vines enclosed in lilies or tulips on Scythian, Avar belt ornament, ribbon of bishop's mitre, Székely gate. Burial on horseback. Blood covenant, in which the contracting parties became brothers and sisters by giving the blood of the body. A lion attacking a deer in Scythian and Hungarian salt cellars. Horned lion with tree of life in Hungarian folk art, on Székely cap and Sarmatian headdress. Could they be lying to us?
As a Hungarian, thank you so much for this video! I've been waiting for this for a long time. 💖King Béla III DNA is very similar to mine (and many other Hungarian's) DNA: 60.9% East European, 23.3% Balkan, 15.8% Irish, Scottish, Welsh.
Yes you Hungarians are actually Slavs since you have similar DNA to your Slavic neighbours and totally different than Finish whose language is closely related to Hungarian.
@@tongobong1 Not closely related. Distantly related.
@goddesslv have you uploaded your autosomal raw data file to mytrueancestry?
You mean you are 60,9 slavic haplogroup?23,3 is from Balkan..we have here I2 haplogroup..and something more..15,8 is a Kelts
@@tongobong1Slav-Slöwen are mostly identity lost Hungarians.
Has blue eyes, can digest milk, sounds pretty European to me.
AND? Among Asians there are also many blue-eyed and able to digest milk, for example: Turks, Mongols, Tajiks
@@Scythian_nomad I would not consider Turks as Asians. They are mostly Anatolian and Greek.
@@martinthemartian1070 We Turks are from Central Asia
@@Scythian_nomad those people are not blue eyed
R1A is very normal in europe
Im guessing mostly eastern European.
Amazing video! I love your content. ❤
Amazing vid , always wondered how lucky you could get to analyse a medieval monarchs dna
Isn't R1A a Yamnaya DNA normal in europeans since thousands of years ago? it's not central asian for a long time?
The sub-branch is very important, there are Turkic people in the sub-branch
The first Humans to have Haplogroups R1a were the Ancient North Eurasians, an ancient human population that was genetically more related to the current Indigenous Siberians and Native Americans, the Ancient North Eurasians mixed with the Western Hunter Gatherers giving rise to the EHG. , (75% ANE + 25% WHG), the Eastern Hunter Gatherers had children with the Caucasian Hunter Gatherers, giving rise to the Western Steppe Herder or more popularly the Proto-Indo-Europeans (50% EHG + 50% CHG). The Pro-Indo-Europeans of the steppes mixed again with European Farmers and European Hunter-Gatherers, giving rise to modern Europeans.
Before the expansion of the Proto-Indo-Europeans from the steppes, the Paternal Haplogroups were I1 and I2, I1 was related to the European Hunter-Gatherers and I2 was related to the European Farmers, Haplogroup R was scarce before this steppe expansion
The Afanasevo culture (probably proto-Tocharians) were also mostly R1a, just as Corded Ware in Central-North Europe... but not Khvalynsk-Yamna, who were R1b (of a specific Volga subclade, not directly related to West European R1b or other branches in Asia and Africa).
That Afanasevo R1a has remained in the area, especially in Altai, until present day.
@@LuisAldamiz The autosomal DNA of the early Tocharians reveals that they are 80% Ancient North Eurasians and 20% Northeast Asian. This DNA is typical of Central Asian Hunter Gatherers and is reminiscent of the genetic makeup of Native Americans (70% Northeast Asia and 30% Ancient North Eurasians).
Can you do one for Bulgarians and Turkish people, and Volga Tatars?
And for Pomaks too
Sşavic turkic öix. Tatar Turkic.. 😅
Love these videos! Keep them up!
Decimali 👍🏿 Good video brother
It will be interesting if you will do comparison of genoms of Bella and his bashkir genetic relatives. All the bashkirs I know who made dna test have the same mix of eastern European, Scandinavian, Balcan and even Irish genes. Even if there ancestors always lived within the boundaries of historic Bashkortostan and never even visited mentioned territories.
According to Hungarian legends the conquest of the Carpathian Basin was a return to the land of the ancestors. We also know from historical documents that not all Hungarians came to find the land of their ancestors (today Hungary) but a significant portion was left in the East. Friar Julian went to find them in the XIII century and reported his success to the king. After the Mongol invasion of the area this remaining Hungarian population was nowhere found. Now the genetics found them in Bashkiria. Since Hungarians migrated first East from today Hungary and only a portion returned to Hungary it explains the genetic mix of Bashkirs, the remnants of the old Hungarians coming from the West.
Irish/Scottish/Welsh DNA only appears, because they are just an earlier migration to west from east. Basically old relatives.
@@freebozkurt9277 In addition to the Hungarian tribes, they also participated in the ethnic distribution of the demographic massto Hungarianization:
1. Barsilii/Bersilii (Varsány in Hungarian), Asian tribe of Turkic origin, related to the Khazars and Bulgarians.
2. The Berenii/Barangeri (Berény in Hungarian), Asian tribe, supposed to be of Tunguso-Manchurian (Turanic) origin, which was part of the great Avar Horde, settled in the Pannonian Plain approximately in 670;3. Bulacii (Bulak in Hungarian), Asian tribe of proto-Bulgarian (Turkish) origin, settled in the Carpathian basin between 750-800, alongside the non-Hungarian ancestors of the Szeklers.
4. The Kozars (Kozár in Hungarian), generic name given to the Khazars, descendants of Khazar;
5. The Eslars (Eszlár in Hungarian), a tribe of Alan (Indo-European) origin. The name is preserved in the name of the locality Tiszaeszlár (Tisza-Eszlár) in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg county.
6. Herenii/Chechens (Herény in Hungarian), Caucasian tribe that was part of the old Hungarian tribal union.
7. The Iorsi (Örs in Hungarian), Asian tribe of Turkic origin. This is supposed to be, along with the Kavari and Kalizi, one of the three Khazar tribes that joined the old Hungarian tribal union;
8. The Ladans (Ladány in Hungarian), a Caucasian tribe of Iranian (Indo-European) origin settled in Pannonia together with the Hungarians;
9. Nandorii (Nándor in Hungarian), a tribe of Bulgarian (Turkish) origin settled in Pannonia before the Hungarian invasion, precisely in the year 830.
10. Kalizii (Káliz/Kálaz in Hungarian) one of the three Khazar tribes (along with Kavari and Iorsi), supposed to be of Indo-European origin, who joined the old Hungarian tribal union;
11. The Kelfans/Kolpans (Kölpény in Hungarian), a European ethnic group of uncertain origin, probably Scandinavian, whose name may come from the old Scandinavian kylfingr (from kylfa - club, club). They were recruited by the Hungarians as elite soldiers.
12. The Palots (Palóc in Hungarian), a population of uncertain origin, presumably Turkic, considered to be descended from the Pechenegs, a fact suggested by the ethnonym Paloț < Poloŭț < Poloveț/Polovți attributed to the Pechenegs by the Slavs. 13. Pechenegs (Besnyő in Hungarian), Asian tribal union, of Turkic origin, settled in the Pannonian Plain before the Hungarians. Among the fully Magyarized tribes we know the following:Culbeii (Külbej in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · Ciurii (Csur in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · Erdimi (Értem in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · Baii (Baj in Hungarian), tribe of Pecheneg origin; · The Tolmacs (Tolmács in Hungarian), a Pecheneg-type tribe of Turkic origin; 14. The Sabiris (Szabir/Szabor in Hungarian), an Asian tribe of Turkic (Hunic) origin that participated in the ethnogenesis of the Khazars. There is also the hypothesis of the Finno-Ugric origin of this tribe, with the specification that it endured a deep Turkization process. From the name of this tribe comes the name Siberia, the place of formation of Ugrofins; 15. The Szeklers (Székely in Hungarian), an Asian tribe of Turkic origin, of the Kapceak type, which received an additional Turkic input, by merging with the Bulacii. 16. Şagii (Ság in Hungarian), a tribe of uncertain origin, considered by some to be of Indo-European origin, related to the Alans; 17. The Tarcans/Tarkanii (Tarkány in Hungarian), a tribe of Turkic origin descended from the Khazar kavars. Not to be confused with the Bashkir tribe of the Tarians (Tarján in Hungarian), also assimilated by the Hungarians; 18. The Varhunites (Várkony in Hungarian), a tribe of Avar origin, whose name is explained as a compound: Avar-Huns, settled in Pannonia in 567. Of course, apart from these auxiliary tribes of the Hungarians, we must also take into account the non-Hungarian, Indo-European and quite numerous populations for those times, over which the tribes from the old Hungarian tribal union (Bashkir tribes and 1 Ugric dominant tribe) settled upon their arrival in the Pannonian Plain: 1. the Germans, 2. the Slavs, 3. the Romanians.
So there is no need for all Scythians to be Hungarian, nor to invent a shuttle from Pusta to the Urals with Caspian loops or that in Scythia Minor they spoke old Hungarian. When they dismounted, they also found populations that spoke languages similar to or compatible with Hungarian.
Your words have no scientific value
@@freebozkurt9277سخن شما ارزش علمی ندارد
Just found out I'm related to this guy lol. Thanks.
Ive heard the not only the finnish, turks, and Hungarian are related but also the Basque.
We are neither linguistically nor genetically related to the Finns.
Anyone who compares spoken Finnish and Hungarian can immediately see the huge difference.
The Finnish accent is completely different from the Hungarian accent.
Even the Finns don't take this false kinship seriously anymore.
This is a political pseudo-scientific theorem created during the Habsburg Empire.
The Hungarian Academy of Sciences still takes this pseudo-scientific claim seriously.
I noticed that the Hungarian language is closest to the Albanian language in terms of accent. Albanians learn Hungarian very easily and speak with an impeccable accent.
@@MihalyToth-w3q Hungarian is an agglutinative, Uralic-language. Albanian is a none-agglutinative, Indo-European language. They have nothing in common.
@@TheCatsMeoooow it is officially classified as the only member of an independent branch of the Indo-European language family.
In fact, this classification was a political decision of the Albanians.
@@TheCatsMeoooow Ancient Greek was an easy language for Hungarians to learn for a long time. It was taught in high schools alongside Latin.
Ancient Greek is also subsequently classified as an Indo-European language. Greek and Ancient Greek do not have much in common.
@@MihalyToth-w3q It still does not make Albanian an Uralic language family, or Hungarian an Indo-European language family. Latin was taught as the main language all over Europe.
Some Scythian symbols in the Hungarian tradition. Four lilies around the sun on the Solti hair braid and Scythian carpet. Heart-shaped lily on Scythian carpet and Hungarian ornaments. Tulip in the shape of a belly below with a seed in the ventral part on Scythian jewellery, on Sarkad bracelets and in Hungarian folk art. Bird with beak in contact with its breast on Scythian, Reformed and even Catholic churches, and on embroidery from Raba. Antlers ending in a lily on a vessel used to store Hungarian salt and on a Scythian tattoo in Paziriki. A miraculous deer with burning antlers on a Scythian horn from Greenhalomusta, in the legend of St. Lazarus' encounter with the miraculous deer. Even in folk ritual chants, the miraculous stag that became one with the boy has burning antlers! In the Paziriki carpet, the boy who became a deer also appears. Depictions of an eagle or griffin above a stag are found in Scythian Hun art, and in Hungary on a stone carving of an arched doorway from a medieval church in Székesfehérvár and on a railing of a sanctuary in Zalavaro. Eagle's head with ears in Scythian, Avar, monastery excavated in Bélapátfalva. Vines enclosed in lilies or tulips in Scythian, Avar archaeological finds, on the ribbon of a bishop's mitre, on the gates of Szekler. Burial with horse sacrifice. Blood pacts, in which the contracting parties became brothers and sisters by giving their blood. A lion attacking a deer on Scythian and Hungarian salt pans. Deer with tree of life in Hungarian folk art, on Szekler gates and on Sarmatian headdresses. Could they be lying to us?
Did the Vandals originate from Hungary?
There are historians who wrote of their arrival in North Africa in 429. Historians specify that they passed through the Strait of Jibraltar in Morocco, they built a kingdom in North Africa from 429 until 533.
I don't think so. They were in Poland before they passed through other regions.
@@mango2005 شكرا تحياتي 🙏
They lived there in the Carpathian area right before the Magyars (Hungarians) occupation. So yes, maybe there were some Vandal tribes left there.
The Vandals were a Germanic tribe
no they came from caucazus region
Everbody like: "How could his genome be all European, when hungarians descended from Asia just a few centuries before he was born...?" But what most people forget is that all/most European peoples descend from what we today call Asia, no matter the tone of their skin or eye color. The pale and blue eyed Europeans also descend from Asia, non the less. All of the currently native European genome made up a significant part of the Asian gene pool. It was later, as these tribes moved westworth, that the Asian gene pool changed into what it is today. One needs to understand the the historical prosess of the Asian migration into Europe; the Asian peoples migrating into Europe, became the Europeans of today. While the Asian peoples seen as a whole, changed as a consequence of the emigration of several folk groups, who totally left the continent to settle down in the West (now called Europe).
hungarians not descended from asia only our ruling class did
Magyars were themselves mixed.
Yes Huns and Magyars although spoke Uralic languages , while migrating westwards must have intermixed with all Indo-european peoples on their way ( Scythian Alans , Ostrogoths , Slavs,... ) .
@@majidbineshgar7156
Initially, the Hungarians did not have a common language, some of the Hungarians spoke Ugric, some spoke Turkic
They became completely Ugric-speaking when they settled in Europe; their nobility and rulers forgot the Turkic language
@@Scythian_nomad To certain extent I agree with you that Hun leaders according to Historians had East Asian features : " Most of the ancient descriptions of the Huns stress their strange appearance from a Roman perspective. These descriptions typically caricature the Huns as monsters. Jordanes stresses that the Huns were short of stature, had tanned skin and round and shapeless heads. Various writers mention that the Huns had small eyes and flat noses. The Roman writer Priscus gives the following eyewitness description of Attila: "Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his ( Mongoloid-Turkic) origin," but the bulk of their Army were composed of various ethnicities mainly Non-Turkic Caucasoid features, and subsequently Magyars have never identified themselves as related to Turkic peoples at all .
@@Scythian_nomad its a Uralic language like Finnish and Estonian
@@Scythian_nomad Before Magyars came to Hungary Hungarians spoke mostly Slavic languages similar to Slovenian and Bulgarian. Actually Slovenian and Bulgarian languages came from Hungary to the current locations.
If you think that the Hungarian language belongs to the Finno-Ugric language family, have you ever heard a Finnish person speak?
They speak with a completely different accent.
To imagine that a language can be separated from the accents and timbres associated with it is totally wrong.
Spoken language is much more than what can be described with written signs.
In fact, it is the smallest part of our communication.
Metacommunication has a much bigger role.
The melody of the Hungarian spoken language is closest to the melody of the Albanian language. Albanians also consider themselves Scythians.
C'mon.😂 We know Albanian genetics. Now you're just making stuff up.
Almost 30% of Hungarians have green eyes. The highest rate in the world.
source?
@@JoeSanHUN Go to Hungary or any of the stolen territories with Hungarian majority and you'll find out.
I don’t think its accurate.
Im from Southern Hungary and most of my friends have blue, brown or hazel eyes.
My father has green eyes and my mother has brown eyes.
I’ve got hazel eyes.
That percentage is too high.
@@erdzso7036 Have you been to territories that were stolen from Hungary in 1920? A lot of green eyed Hungarians there.
@@erdzso7036😊q
PQ
wow I didn't know that the Arpad dynasty carried the genetics of the Karachay Turks. R1a-z2123 %37 + g2a-p15 %31.
"These people are distinguished by their excellent posture, expressive facial features, pleasant appearance and flexible body. I noticed that in this respect no other nation is so similar to the Hungarians as the Karachays and Digors, whom I met later in Nalchik... They speak the Tatar language and have the Mohammedan religion, which they profess as they please, with the exception of the youth, who scrupulously observe all the rites. I think it would not be difficult to make converts out of them."
( Hungarian Traveller Jean-Charles de Besse - Journey to the Crimea, the Caucasus, Georgia, Armenia, Asia Minor and Constantinople in the years 1829 and 1830. Chapter VIII. Paris, 1838 - translated from French by A. I. Petrov)
we hungarians originated from right here from the carpathian basin. tordos-vinca culture, avars, schytians, post ice age populations along with the serbs
If it's true. Then there is only one question left... why do they have to hide this ? so hard
@@tattooairinc6308 its complicated. Both historically and politically. Its the decision of the academics.
In total, 46% of the world's population ( 3.2 billion people ) speaks an Indo-European language as a first language - by far the highest of any language family. There are about 445 living Indo-European languages, according to an estimate by Ethnologue, with over two-thirds ( 313 ) of them belonging to the Indo-Iranian branch. - wikipedia
In 1583, English Jesuit missionary and Konkani scholar Thomas Stephens wrote a letter from Goa to his brother ( not published until the 20th century ) in which he noted similarities between Indian languages and Greek and Latin. - wikipedia
In 1647, Dutch linguist and scholar Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn noted the similarity among certain Asian and European languages and theorized that they were derived from a primitive common language that he called Scythian. - wikipedia
Marcus Zuërius van Boxhorn was one of the most important historical linguists. His Indo-Scythian theory laid the foundation for today's understanding of the Indo-European language family. - wikipedia
Another early systematic attempt to prove the relationship between two languages on the basis of similarity of grammar and lexicon was made by the Hungarian János Sajnovics in 1770, when he attempted to demonstrate the relationship between Sami and Hungarian. - wikipedia
That work was later extended to all Finno-Ugric languages in 1799 by his countryman Samuel Gyarmathi. János Sajnovics de Tordas et Káloz ( Tordas 1733 - 1785 ) was a Hungarian linguist and member of the Jesuit order. - wikipedia
Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand -Périgord ( 1754 - 1838 ), 1st Prince of Benevento, then Prince of Talleyrand, was a French secularised clergyman, statesman and leading diplomat. After studying theology, he became Agent-General of the Clergy in 1780. - wikipedia
According to tradition, when Napoleon ( 1769 - 1821 ) asked Francois Talleyrand what has since become a classic question about what to do with the Hungarians, Talleyrand is said to have replied simply:
"Your Majesty! The Hungarians have an old habit of looking up to their elders and being proud of their past. Take it away the past of this people and you do with them what you want!"
You Hungarians are of Central Asian descent, close relatives to Kazahs, Turkmens, Uzbeks, Tajiks, etc., even your PM V. Orban attended a conference of those countries organized there, so not even Pannonia is your homeland, do yourselves a big favor and stop spreading here BS stories like these 😡😡
@@MihaiMustea-f6o YOU do yourself a favor and stop spreading BS about this. AVARS, trodos-vinca-scythians, post ice age population. You know despite you know NOTHINGabout the history of MAGYARS ( and HUNORS) you sure talk big. You dont even understand that the SECOND wave that came back to the carpathian basin had from a merged 7 tribes to begin with. All 7 tribes from different areas and directions...
The Beethoven connection is a real surprise.
Just to mention the fact a Hungarian King because the Saint Crown whenever can be East Roman Emperor,but a Roman Emperor never can become Hungarian King!!! Today if Hungary want again to become Kingdom they can make it without a King ,because the Saint Crown had the Saint Soul and is considered a person not an artefact.That Saint Crown giving divine security for all Central European nations not just for Hungary is a symbol of divine protectorate for Slovaks,Czeh,Polland,Serbians Austria,Moldova ,Romania and maybe more.That Crown had a power in past and have in our day too! This Crown united all of this nations under protectorate and not matter if they do it or not , all of this nations can protect the Crown too but Hungary was so many time alone in his fights saving European Culture in all history .Don't forget it !!!
KÖSZÖNET AZ IGAZI TÖRTÉNELMI JELENTÖSÉGÜ SZT.KORONA ISMERÉSE MIATT....
@@katalinjuhasz641 Igazabol mindenki tudja aki kell es ezert is felnek egyes szomszedok,mert tudjak.Felnek,hogy ujra valtozas johet csak azt nem ,hogy mikor es milyen formaban.A Szent Koronanak mind a mai napig megvan a jelentosege,bar a mai fitalabb korosztaly nem foglalkozik vele,de ha megpillantjak akar a zaszlon,akar egy egyszeru rajzon,tudatalatt megdobban ra a szivuk anelkul ,hogy ertenek mi tortenik.Ezert eros ma is a Hit es az Egyhaz!
Yo soy español y mi linaje paterno es R-L51 y el materno H1
Argentino con materno H1 aqui, paterno del grupo T
@@TheMaxik Saludos hermano
The Hungarians who conquered at the end of the 10. century were 10% of the local population. 60% of the conquering population were genetically similar to the Bashkirs and Volga Tatars (former Volga Bulgars) living today. Among the ancient archaeological cultures, they were genetically related to the OKUNEVO culture, Siberian Scythians (based on samples of bones from Scythians living in Tuva and present-day Kazakhstan), Scythians found in Pazyryk in the Altai Mountains, Sagly-Uyuk culture, Xiongnu culture found in western Mongolia. Hungarians considered themselves Scythians and Huns (Scythians among the Huns) according to our ancient chronicles. Video: ruclips.net/video/6tjGxX-4ZZA/видео.html time: 20:02.
Interesting video. It was usual that nobility did not know borders....
I know far too little about classical music; when I was young, I was told "that was not for my kind"".
Anybody can tell me name of this music?
Franz Liszt Hungarian Rapsody
Liszt - Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2
may i ask hungarians,are Arpad related,with Dulo clan and Volga Bulgaria ?
Magyar mitológiában van egy DUL nevű fejedelem, akinek a lányait veszik el a HUNOR és MAGOR nevű testvérek. Tőlük származnak a hunok és magyarok. A történet helyszíne a Kaukázustól északra lévő terület. Genetikai vizsgálatot nem találtam a bolgár hódítókról. Genetikailag Árpád hódítói rokonságban állnak a mai baskírokkal és volgai bolgárokkal (tatárokkal).
Nothing new. Turkic people conquering new lands, mixing with the people of the conquered lands, eventually look like them while still maintaining the ruler statue. It has always been like that.
That's right ! 😊
Except hungarians aren't turkic and Béla III was a rather early king
We wuz moravians,pannonians and shieeed..So many salty pan-slavists in the comments bruh stop capping pls. No we are not slavs thx we do not claim anything that is related to "slavness" not kolovrat, non sun worship, no "'Rus"-myth no dazbog etc. etc. We dont even claim Balkan smh. Also Béla has got probably nothing to do with the word bela-white. Béla means inner parts, intestines since our language is agglutinative and non indo-european it's obviously not it.
Janos Hunyadi, Sandor Petefi, Lajos Kosut su bili Sloveni.
@@Фамилија-г3с Hunyadi János was not a Slav. He was Hungarian:
“...Within the framework of Hungarian-Croatian international research, in 2021 the Hungarian Research Institute collected bone samples from the bone remains of János Corvin and Kristóf Corvin buried here from the Gothic Pauline monastery of Lepoglava in present-day Croatia in order to determine their genetic composition. This genetic information is crucial for identifying the remains of King Matthias Hunyadi, whose bones are scattered in the ossuary of Székesfehérvár, Hungary.
Endre Neparáczki's team successfully identified the DNA profiles of the last two male members of the Hunyadi family using next-generation sequencing, the genetic result was published in 2022 in the highest-Q1 rating foreign Heliyon academic journal.
The father-son relationship between the two Hunyadi descendants was confirmed. The paternal Y-chromosome of János Corvin and Kristóf Corvin is the Haplosome E1b1b1a1b1a6a1c∼ (E-BY4281), which is widespread in Eurasia. This haplogroup belongs to group E-V13, which is part of branch E-M78. Compared to ancient samples, the closest genetic correspondence with the paternal haplogroup of Hunyadi descendants is a sample from the Otrar-Karatau culture, the Iron Age Kazakh steppe, and a sample from medieval Sardinia. The closest ancient pattern matches from the Carpathian Basin were found with the paternal haplogroup of the Hunyadi family, an Avar pattern, an elite Hungarian conqueror pattern and a sample of a medieval Hungarian nobleman from the Royal Basilica of Székesfehérvár.
János Corvin belongs to the mitochondrial haplogroup T2b, his maternal lineage is a haplogroup widespread throughout Eurasia. His son, Kristóf Corvinus, belongs to the rare mitochondrial haplogroup T2c1+146, his maternal lineage was already present in the Neolithic era in the area of today's Hungary, but it occurs most often in the Mediterranean region. The genetic origin of both maternal lines is consistent with the known ancestry of the mothers.
Genetic analysis showed that János Corvin and Kristóf had an ancient European genome composition. Most of János Corvin's genome components have been present in the Carpathian Basin for thousands of years, the highest number of common genetic components are with European Neolithic samples and Hungarian Neolithic samples: the TransDanubian Polish culture, the Bodrogkeresztúr culture, the Kőrös culture, the lowland lined pottery culture. Kristóf Corvin's genome matches samples from the Croatian Copper Age Vučedol culture, which he received from his mother.
Several statements have been made regarding the genetic identification of the Hunyadis. According to Gábor Horváth-Lugossy, then Director General of the Hungarian Research Institute, László Tamás Vizi, Deputy Director General for Scientific Affairs of the Institute, historian Csaba Hidán, and archaeogeneticist Endre Neparáczki, the centuries-old debate has been settled, with the fact that Hunyadi genetics are ancient from the Carpathian Basin, the results confirm the Hungarian position already represented, according to which János Hunyadi was of Hungarian origin…” Wiki
@@Фамилија-г3с As for people like Kossuth and Petőfi:
When Hungary became muli ethnic (Ottoman invasions wiped a large chunk of the population), Maria-Theresia invited people from surrounding countries to settle at certain parts of the country. This is no secret. Many of our highly regarded national hero's and beloved historical figures are not Hungarian by blood, but because they FELT Hungarian, and PROCLAIMED THEMSELVES so, they were ACCEPTED as fully Hungarian. For example, Petőfi Sándor was Slovak origin and this is no secret, everyone knows in Hungary (well, the ones who payed attention in school do). In Hungary, as an adult, he became a poet. One of the most LOVED Hungarian poets. He proclaimed that he FELT and WANTED to become a Hungarian and then he changed his name from Petrovich to Petőfi. No one forced him to, it was his decision.
"..Petőfi was born on the New Year's morning of 1823, in the town of Kiskőrös, Kingdom of Hungary. The population of Kiskőrös was predominantly of Slovak origin as a consequence of the Habsburgs' reconstruction policy designed to settle, where possible, non-Hungarians in areas devastated during the Turkish wars.[4] His birth certificate, in Latin, gives his name as "Alexander Petrovics",[2][3] where "Alexander" is the Latin equivalent of the Hungarian "Sándor". His father, István (Stephanus) Petrovics, was a village butcher, innkeeper and he was A SECOND GENERATION Serb[5][6][7] or Slovak[1][8][9] IMMIGRANT to the Great Hungarian Plain.[10] [a]
Mária Hrúz, Petőfi's mother, was a servant and laundress before her marriage. She was of Slovak descent and spoke Hungarian with something of an accent.[14][15] Petőfi's parents first met in Maglód, married in Aszód and moved to Kiskőrös a year before the birth of the poet.[4]
The family lived for some time in Szabadszállás, where his father owned a slaughterhouse. Within two years, the family moved to Kiskunfélegyháza, and Petőfi always viewed the city as his true home..." Wiki
@@Фамилија-г3с "...Today, schools, streets and squares are named after him throughout Hungary and Hungarian-speaking regions of neighbouring states; in Budapest alone, there are 11 Petőfi streets and 4 Petőfi squares, see: Public place names of Budapest. A national radio station (Radio Petőfi), a bridge in Budapest and a street in Sofia, Bulgaria also bear his name, as well as the asteroid 4483 Petöfi, a member of the Hungaria family. Every Hungarian primary school child learns some of his poems by heart. The Hungarian 10 Forint banknote valid between 1947 and 1992 depicted Sándor Petőfi on the obverse.
Petőfi has a larger than life terra cotta statue near the Pest end of Erzsébet Bridge, sculpted by Miklós Izsó and Adolf Huszár [hu]. Similar Petőfi statues were established in many other cities, as well, during the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century..." Wiki
@@Фамилија-г3с So what did the Slovaks or Czechs do?
"In 1911, a statue of Sándor Petőfi was erected in Pressburg (Pozsony, present-day Bratislava), on the Main Square. In 1918, after the army of the newly independent First Czechoslovak Republic occupied the city, the statue was dynamited.[20][21] After this sculpture was boarded over round temporarily until its removal, and replaced with a statue of Slovak poet Pavol Országh Hviezdoslav.[22] Today, there is a statue of Petőfi in the Medic Garden (Medická záhrada).[23]" Wiki
Might I add the so called Slovak poet, that was erected in place of Petőfi's statue has one Hungarian name too = Országh which means Country in old Hungarian. ;)
The Magyar language predates the arrival of the Arpad era in 895AD. It was already present during and before the Roman empire for thousands of years. That is why, it is an island within the IndoEuropean sea of languages in present day Europe. (not because it was brought there by the arrival of Árpád and his people's, - who were simply returning to their ancestral homeland from Asia and thus spoke the same language as the local population,- who welcomed them as liberators from their Frankish and Bulgarian oppressors-)
Could you pls mention some sources? E.g . did some Greek or Roman writters say that ?
@@florinwlad4434 Ammianus Marcellinus wrote that he wanted to welcome the Sarmatians as obedient subjects of the Roman emperor. The name "obedient subject" did not please one of the Sarmatians, who pulled off his boots and threw them at the emperor, shouting the words "MARHA MARHA". The word MARHA in Hungarian means cattle and fool.
You should do a video on the jat people of North indian
How can you do a video about Magyars and not learn how to pronounce it first?! Seriously.
Edit: the way to pronounce the gy in Magyar is pretty much identical to the way the d is pronounced in the English word dew.
I thought it was pronounced with a hard G and Y as in Yellow. I'm Serbian and that's how I heard Hungarians pronounce it.
Name Magyar is derived from ancient name of Southern Ural & Southern Volga region; Magog. According to old Assyrian & Persian sources. And also biblical history too.
What's the music?
Starts with Liszt's second Hungarian rhapsody. Some other pieces towards the end.
Liszt: Magyar rapszódia sz. 2. ruclips.net/video/ckSWhM53PmQ/видео.html
@@barbarapiazza-georgi3831 Thankyou
@@darylnogo3279 Thankyou
Amazing job as always bro, hope to see if it is possible a video about Mountain Caucasian Jews sample, Earlier Kurds, Lurs, Earlier Korean Peninsula people, Avar people (from Dagestan), Tat people (north Iran), Laz people (Turkiye), Khazars (Turkic people), Yayoi people (Japan)
anyone can explain to me, why doesn't have DNA maps of russia/siberia?
Bashkir DNA is 44.2% Indo-European from the steppes, 23.6% Nganasan (indigenous Siberian), 15.8% Han Chinese (East Asian), 1.6% WHG, 1.4% Levant, 0.6% Taforaf, 0.4% LapaDosantos_9600BP
Were you taken this data?
IE from the steppe, LOL. ANd they still force this nonsense. The DNA has no language, especially IE, which is a very very young language branch.
@@gulnaragalyautdinova3635G25 data. We can observe that the main Bashkir dna is Steppe, a very characteristic dna of Northern Europeans, it also has typical Finn-Ugric dna, Nganasan is the most characteristic dna, in addition to that it has East Asian dna. It has almost no European Hunter Gatherer DNA and no Anatolian DNA, which are very characteristic of Europeans, and it also has a small affinity towards Ancient North Africans and South American Natives. The genetic history of Bashkirs, Mezhovskaya and Nganasan mix, giving rise to Proto Ugors, these mix again with the Ancient Sarmatians and Xiangnu Empire.
We discriminate against each other just look at the voting in the Eurovision contest 😂 and yet history has mixed us up like the minestrone soup,a bit of everything
Cool
Tocharians were mainly R1a, though haplogroup R1b is also present. The original Bulghars were a mixture of Tocharians + Buryats + Koreans.
Source?
Buryats ? 😂
@@barguttobed They're reference populations, surely the Buryat (a Mongol sub-ethnicity in what is now Siberia, Russia) and Koreans represent the Turkic/Hunnic ancestry.
@@LuisAldamizANE is not a Phantom component, it is a real and completely measured component unlike Basal Eurasian, the child of Mal'Ta Buret and Anfotova Gora are two 100% pure Individuals, and their paternal and maternal Haplogroups influenced the majority of Eurasians , in variable frequencies, with the Indigenous Siberians and the Natives of the Americas having the highest percentage, in the Ket and the South Americans it reaches 45% and in the Finn-Ugric peoples of Western Siberia, the Komi, the Sami it arrives in 30%
@@LuisAldamizThe Basal Eurasian component is very different, we do not have a pure component, it is not easy to follow their Haplogroups either, there is a lack of information, ANE is a very different fact, we have their original DNA and we have Haplogroups of all the lineages with which we can trace where ANE came from and what group they influenced, ANE was predominantly early Western Eurasian mixed with 1/5 early East Eurasian, the modern Siberian Indigenous and South American Natives, the largest amount comes from the Northeast, that is why they are closer to the Eurasian of the This, however, are also the ones that have the most ANE.
My father is 50/50 Frisian (mom) and Hungarian (dad) , my mother is 100% Czech.. i have black hair, light blue eyes and almost Asian eye shape... im proud to be Magyar, but i think im a bit of everything between Friesland and the Ural😂😂😂😂
So where did you get your almost Asan eye shape, from your Mom's side? Because Hungarians don't have Asian slanted eyes.
@@TheCatsMeoooowу венгров встречаются, хоть и редко, пару раз видел на удивление
@@СамирТурдыбеков Interesting, I was born and bread in Hungary. And I have not seen it.
hungarian,austrian,slovaks,croats dnas are very similar but today hungarians have 4% asian dna from conquer magyars, and your eyes probably from jasz or kun people
@@latakicsi2183 Kun people are Cuman and Jasz are Jassi (Scythians). If they are the Asian Schytians it could be, but if they are the Western Schythians then not.
The Hungarians who conquered at the end of the 10. century were 10-15% of the local population. 60% of the conquering population were genetically similar to the Bashkirs and Volga Tatars (former Volga Bulgars) living today. Among the ancient archaeological cultures, they were genetically related to the OKUNEVO culture, Siberian Scythians (based on samples of bones from Scythians living in Tuva and present-day Kazakhstan), Scythians found in Pazyryk in the Altai Mountains, Sagly-Uyuk culture, Xiongnu culture found in western Mongolia. Hungarians considered themselves Scythians and Huns (Scythians among the Huns) according to our ancient chronicles. Video: ruclips.net/video/6tjGxX-4ZZA/видео.html time: 20:02.
Uralic Fino-Ugric people are European and always were though, yes they are from various areas of Eastern Europe and Eurasia and have a little bit of East Asian heritage too.
Came here after just finding out i am also a direct descendant of king bela III. Interesting!
Im related to him amd queen Elizabeth to 😭
King bela had Viking family/ancestors no?
He had Viking ancestors on his mother's side.
I think they have some scythian dna and origins
I am a true Hungarian woman with "certainly" many royal genes in my veins. Who knows ? I myself will find out sooner or later.💬🙂
Is Ural Mountains in Central Asia? No. It is very, very, very… Western Asia, the border between Europe and Asia. Bašhkirs who live in Urals, live in rather Western Eurasia.
I think there is rather big missunderstanding about the genetics of Europe and Western Eurasia. No of the language groups are genetically ”pure”.
"Uralic" derives from Urals of course but it's a linguistic term. The Uralics were originally an East Asian people who became Siberian specialists after the last glacial maximum (i.e. after c. 20,000 BP), reaching Europe c. 10,000 BP and as such are actually the oldest surviving ethnolinguistic family of Europe but still not fully from Europe because of their East Asian and Siberian roots, which still manifest in their genetics (notably Y-DNA N1).
Now, the Siberian Uralics (Ugrics and Nganassan) had intense interaction with Indo-Aryans prior to their migration to South Asia, although they may have been in the bad side of Iranics (Scythians and the like) later on. This is apparent for example in the archaeogenetics of Altai but also in those of the current main Ugric homeland in West Siberia, and it's also apparent in greater Uralic influence in Indo-Aryan than in other Inodeuropean languages AFAIK. In any case, there was never a hard line between the steppe (dominated by Indoeuropeans until the arrival of the Turks/Huns) and the taiga (dominated by Uralics and other taiga specialist peoples, incl. for a time probably the Tungusic, etc.) and both "specialist" populations have at times overflowed their specialist niches into the others'. Magyars just became steppe specialists, and admixed probably with other steppe specialists (Turkics, Inodeuropeans) before feeling the Khazar push and deciding it was worthy to conquer the Bulgarian Pannonia and establish there their homeland and base for further raids.
Hungarians are very closely related to Bashkir Turks, this is not a Turk, but it is certain that there is an affinity with the Turks, even in Hungarian there are a lot of Western Turkic words and none of them are borrowed because they are from the Pre-Hungarians
Of course, it is more common in the scientific community that they are from the Finno-Ugric peoples, but this does not make any sense in my opinion, because if they are from the Finno-Ugric family, then it is impossible for them to be descendants of the Scythians-Huns.
The Hungarians as descendants of the Scythians, the Huns is an invention of the feudal church intended to provide the royal family with prestigious ancestors. It is based only on Greek, Latin-Germanic written sources, the Bible; and not a popular tradition!
As you say, the words borrowed from the Turkish language are of Western types... wich means that the Hungarians do not come from Central Asia but somewhere between the Black Sea and the Urals!
That's correct, Hungarians are NOT descendants of Scythians or Huns, the Huns were a separate tribe, sharing with the Hungarians the same non-European origin.
@@belagyanta7 My Hungarian friends generally deny this, in terms of genotype and phenotype, the probability of being Germans is almost impossible, Germanic and Hungarian tribes are not the same.
@@Khorasan_Turco where did i say that the ancient Hungarians and Germans were the same thing? Of course they aren't.
On the other, those of today... it's another story!
@@MihaiMustea-f6o That's interesting because I am Hungarian and have 39.4% Scythian in my DNA.
Bashkirs themselves are an assimilated Eastern European population, by a Turkic nomad elite. By the time the Magyars reached central Europe they acquired already many East European types of people. Genetically they were no longer Uralic or Turkic, but majority East European.
G25 data. Bashkirs dna 44.2% Indo-European Steppe, 23.6% Nganasan (Indigenous Siberian), 15.8% Chinese Han, (East Asia), 1.6% WHG, 1.4% Levant, 0.6% Taforat, 0.4% LapaDosantos_9600BP. We can observe that the main Bashkir dna is Steppe, a very characteristic dna of Northern and Eastern Europeans, it also has typical Finn-Ugric dna, Nganasan is the most characteristic dna, in addition to that it has East Asian dna. It has almost no European Hunter Gatherer DNA and no Anatolian DNA, which are very characteristic of the main European components, and it also has a small affinity towards the Levant, Ancient North Africans and South American Natives. From a historical genetic perspective, Mezhovskaya and Nganasan merge, giving rise to Proto Ugors, Early Sarmatians mix with Ugors, mix with Xiangnu Empire, then there is a genetic flow from Hunnic Empire, multiple waves mixed from Eastern Europe and Asia, although They have always been a mix of Asians and Europeans.
Northern Asia?
Siberia.
In fact, data from this cycle of papers say that the Bashkirs have an average of about 60% Western Eurasian and 40% Eastern Eurasian origin, inherited from their Hunnic ancestors. And their neighbors - the Volga Tatars, have on average about 80% Western and 20% Eastern Eurasian origin, inherited from the Scytho-Sarmatian ancestors. Anthropologically, the Siberian Tatars and Teleuts, as well as some of the Bashkirs, are close to the Pazyryk Scythians. Thus, the deep ancient ANE-Yamnaya-Sintashta-like pedigree is preserved there. To speak as if it were strange that the Arpads were able to create a flourishing state when the barbaric capital Bilyar of the proto-Tatars was less than Rome, but more than London and Paris of that time. Cities were built taking into account the relief and water supply. And the Bulgar-Kipchak Tatar languages dominated Asia and Europe before they were devastated by invasions from the west and east.
Cope and seethe bro, but the truth is that only the pure ANA Nivkhs Nanai are the OG World Masterrace gigachads with highest testo, ANE-mixed Siberians came on the second place. And the rest of the world for the most are just regular PNJs with no accomplishments.
The Hungarians who conquered at the end of the 10. century were 10-15% of the local population. 60% of the conquering population were genetically similar to the Bashkirs and Volga Tatars (former Volga Bulgars) living today. Among the ancient archaeological cultures, they were genetically related to the OKUNEVO culture, Siberian Scythians (based on samples of bones from Scythians living in Tuva and present-day Kazakhstan), Scythians found in Pazyryk in the Altai Mountains, Sagly-Uyuk culture, Xiongnu culture found in western Mongolia. Hungarians considered themselves Scythians and Huns (Scythians among the Huns) according to our ancient chronicles. Video: ruclips.net/video/6tjGxX-4ZZA/видео.html time: 20:02.
It nose and face structure look like afghans East iranian people's
Kár, hogy nincs magyar nyelvű felirat!
Alapvetően azt mondta, hogy a Bélai DNS megegyezik a mai magyarokéval, de az Árpád-házat közép-ázsiai eredetűnek találta. A Belas haplocsoport a h1b, amelyen Beethoven osztozik
@perseus274 Why don't you learn Hungarian, orc?
What I want to know is how the Magyars get through all the tribes between the Panonian Plain and their original homeland.
All the "tribes" were theirs. Same ruling family ruled them all.
@MbisonBalrog Skillfully😉
@@xerxen100 all tribes between Urals, and Hungary?
Their "original homeland" as far as we know was Ukraine, where they suffered pressure from the Khazars (in what is now Southern Russia), thus they decided to invade parts of Bulgaria (which then reached to Central Hungary but also bordered the ancestral Magyar country by Moldova) and won.
With a lot of courage,and great liders!!
No surprises here.
I really love History. The Music in my opinion is too loud and obnoxious. So, I am going to a different channel. 🕊️ OUT
R1a is Slavic haplogroup..what you talking about?
It's Corded Ware (early Western Indoeuropeans, from which derive Balto-Slavics but also Celto-Italics, Germanics and surely also Greco-Armenians via the Vucedol offshoot) but it's also present in Central Asia since the Afanasevo culture (proto-Tocharians surely, another branch of early Indoeuropean expansion).
In other regions like South Asia R1a is probably from Neolithic origin instead (Elamo-Dravidian or whatever). Just because you have a distant paternal ancestor some 12,000 years ago it doesn't mean your specific branch is the ancestor.
R1a is Kyrguzian haplogroup - up to 65%, Slavic people have around 40%
@@leotka - Polish are rather in the 50% and Czechs may have even higher frequencies, while Corded Ware and successor burials in that area were almost totally 100% R1a, which speaks volumes about R1a being not specifically "Slavic" but broadly Indoeuropean, at least in Europe (Asian R1a may be from Neolithic migrations instead, care should be placed on which subclade it belongs to). But broadly speaking you're right on point.
R1a (M420), predates the existence of the Slavs, possibly EHG or ANE were the first to spread them, Haplogroups R1a Z82 and R1 Z93 are associated with the expansion of the Slavs.
@@user-yt3xd2jl6d R1a spread from West Asia (Iran-Kurdistan, secondarily Turkey) and did so in a Neolithic timeline. However it was later adopted in Europe by the early Indoeuropeans and became their signature (a specific subclade probably originating in Ukraine). As the North Slavs today occupy an area largely similar to that of Corded Ware, they have inherited those typical Indoeuropean lineages, albeit diluted.
DNA match and Found on tree also ;) Descendent ❤
Most populations generally stayed where their ancestors lived, while languages, customs, and beliefs shift overtime. Also, ruling elites across the world exhibit way more mobility and intermixing than your average peasant.
A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations
„The rise and fall of the Roman Empire was a socio-political process with enormous ramifications for human history. The Middle Danube was a crucial frontier and a crossroads for population and cultural movement. Here we present genome-wide data from 136 Balkan individuals dated to the 1st millennium CE. Despite extensive militarization and cultural influence, we find little ancestry contribution from peoples of Italic descent. However, we trace a large-scale influx of people of Anatolian ancestry during the Imperial period. Between ~250-550 CE, we detect migrants with ancestry from Central/Northern Europe and the steppe, confirming that “barbarian” migrations were propelled by ethnically diverse confederations. Following the end of Roman control, we detect the large-scale arrival of individuals who were genetically similar to modern Eastern European Slavic-speaking populations, who contributed 30-60% of the ancestry of Balkan people, representing one of the largest permanent demographic changes anywhere in Europe during the Migration Period.”
The major genetic impact of Slavic migrations is visible not only in current Balkan Slavic-speaking populations, but also in places that today do not speak Slavic languages such as Romania and Greece," said co-senior author David Reich, professor of genetics in the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School and professor of human evolutionary biology in Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
The said migration period which no museum or institution on the Balkans has any evidence for. Certainly not mass migration.
My 23 and me says I'm related to king bela 111
It is not likely that he inherited any of the Croatian genes, since the Croats were a conquered people without respectable nobility. His grandmother Jelena/Ilona was a daughter of Uroš I of Rascia.
Croats exist under this name since 1813, mentioned in a letter stored in archive of Vienna
No contradiction in the various DNA results. Look more.
Ammianus Marcellinus wrote that he wanted to welcome the Sarmatians as obedient subjects of the Roman emperor. The name "obedient subject" did not please one of the Sarmatians, who pulled off his boots and threw them at the emperor, shouting the words "MARHA MARHA". The word MARHA in Hungarian means cattle and fool.
1.A csontváz HIVATALOS mérései-tehát 1850-2024-között 21 cm nőt.
2.Miért is nem a Szent Koronával ábrázolják???
thx
I'm Russian,my DNA R1a , like king Bella?
No, it is from the Bashkir sub-branch of r1a, not from the Russian-Slavic branches.
@@volkanaydemir1440 Please don't confuse genetic kinship with cultural/linguistic kinship!
Thanka
PHENOTYPE does not mean anything when it comes to GENETIC ADMIXTURES
Most be american try to tell whomare Hungarian s
In Hungary that the Hungarian from German origin who make that!
Slavs from Belarus migrated to Lower Austria and the Pannonian Plain before the Magyars came. These Slavs- the Slovaks and Slovenians mixed with the older inhabitants which carried the Danubian DNA of the Ancient Veneti - 1200 BC and the Boii and Carni Celts which came 700 years later in 500 BC and carried the R1b DNA.The Magyars displaced these mixed peoples and took Central Hungary and took the wives of these people who had settled in Hungary previously and surrounded the Inner Core of Magyars. Surprisingly the Magyars co existed peacefully with these people and even adopted their religion. Hungary was the most democratic country in the Middle Ages in Europe and Serfdom was never incorporated.The Magyars always regarded themselves as free people and the leader ruled by example and not by force.
In fact, the story was much darker : the Hungarians were forcibely converted to Catholicism and a feudal system by King Stephen with the support of German knights.
From free riders that they were, they became the serfs of the kingdom; considered not to be part of the nation! Only a small part of these rose to a rank called "common nobles" for having distinguished themselves on the battlefield!
@@belagyanta7 30 német lovaggal?
Bela Lugosi
Йунгару... Йун... Там
Гару... Гарун.. Весна..
R1A is a representative Slavic Haplogroup, along with I2a2 Dinaric haplogroup which is even older. Why are you saying that this R1A is confirming Asian origin from Volga when it doesn't ? This is only proof that Huns and Magyars created a state with major Slavic tribes. Of course he was R1a as most of modern Hungarians look exactly the same as other Slavs. Before Huns, there was Velika Moravia state of Slavs that originates from Serbs.
Not all R1a lineages are Slavic. It's most prevalent among Eastern Iranics, Indics, and Slavs. In fact, the R1a-Z93 subclade, carried by Béla III, belongs to the Indo-Iranian (main Asian) branch of R1a, not the Slavic branch (M458, Z280).
@@JoshuaPerkins-0jn9s A feltételezett indo-iráni nyelvcsaládhoz. Mindezt nyelvemlék nélkül!
R Q N - these are East Asian male chromosomes that originated 60 thousand years ago. The fact that some late Slavs multiplied the mutation of this sex chromosome does not mean at all that there are no more ancient races and peoples.
@@mr.purple1779 Very good observation. N, R, Q haplogroups are from the Lake Baikal area.
900 elött Atilla nagykirály már itt volt! 300 körül!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
So basically Hungarians related to us Central Asians?😮
Yes but just your language group is "ugric" but your DNA is Turkic.
@@Khorasan_Turco No sir, I'm Central Asian☺️
I speak Karluk dialect Turkic language
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat I am also a Turkmen, my brother, I send you love from here
@@Khorasan_Turco Yashaņiz karindaşim.
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat yaşasın kardeşim! ❤️
Ne mutlu Türküm diyene!
terroruzzians spoke finno-hungarian tongues 150 years ago and even till 1920's, when soviets decided to make all the people living in ruzzian federation ssr 'russkies', so they genocided some of them, the others were driven to new places, where genocide of Slavs was made (Ukraine, for example) and we have 'russkies', who take Ukrainian language, its grammar and add some words from finno-hungaric languages.
If someone doesn't believe, you may read ruzzian empire officers' memoirs, where they hate those moksha people, erzya, chud, mordva, ves for their unability to speak so-called 'velikoruzzian' language. Actually, the aristocracy of ruzzian (moscovian) empire were from Tatar or German and ruzzian language was made as Lingua Franca from Ukrainian language (grammar, 30% of vocabulary), Tatar (partially, wordbuilding, upto 65% of vocabulary), French (scientific terms or the things non-existent in moscovia, such as balcony, somewhere 5%). And it was made by a Ukrainian priest from Kyiv-Mohyla Academy named Feofan Prokopovych. You can find it on any web resource, if you check, being a smart being.
In the 10th century, 6% of the population of the Hungarian Principality was of Manysik genetics. Professor Mario Alinei had already predicted that this would be the case. He considered the Etruscan language to be an ancient version of the Hungarian language. 6% immigrants certainly could not have spread a new language here.
am of relation :D
Escandinavos estão pelo mundo todo kkk
Good jop man. İn our tradition if you wanted to know who are you? Look your father, grandfather. His anchestors was baskhir and central asian.
and bashkirs grandfathers were scythian indo europeans 😀
ancestor, not anchestor
@@user_18789 no, turkicc
bashkir yet he speaks a uralic language..
I have read many expert statements that MyHeretage's analyses are highly biased and unreliable. I recommend using other sources. By the way, the Bashkir people are Turkic and speak Turkish. Baskhkir=Baş Kurt in Turkish, it means Head/Chief Wolf.
Or chief worm...
@@stuckonearth4967 no
На Кавказе, у подножия Эльбруса живёт народ, мужская гаплогруппа которого так же R1a..z93..z2123 - это карачаево-балкарцы. Они тюрки, язык которых лингвистами признан, как более древний, чем все древнеписьменные тюркские языки, они абсолютные европеоиды, традиционные виды сельского хозяйства - отгонное животноводство и переработка продукции животноводства, имеются собственные породы лошадей, овец, собак. Территория расселения карачаево-балкарцев изобилует древностями от бронзового века до средневековья, а именно до конца 14 века, когда население было почти полностью уничтожено армией Тамерлана. Так же неподалеку археологами раскопан древний город Маджар, разрушенный войском Тамерлана.