Because accountants tend to be Sloan-type managers who approach new businesses the same way Proctor & Gamble may start a new product line -- starting with a known problem and model, which don't exist in a startup -- therefore, the approach will kill the startup. Startups require a Durrant-style management approach to survive the hunt for an unknown business problem and unknown business model.
So you saying, the Sloan type are the competitors and the other are the original? Eh, competitors always existed. Then Sloan type improve, and establish income? I have never heard of a Durrant? perhaps you can enlighten me?
Who finance the start-up if not Wall Street? How many are actually started from private funds? all ended up on the Exchange. If it is successful, why did they sell their business to the banks?
Because accountants tend to be Sloan-type managers who approach new businesses the same way Proctor & Gamble may start a new product line -- starting with a known problem and model, which don't exist in a startup -- therefore, the approach will kill the startup. Startups require a Durrant-style management approach to survive the hunt for an unknown business problem and unknown business model.
Present😊
So you saying, the Sloan type are the competitors and the other are the original?
Eh, competitors always existed. Then Sloan type improve, and establish income?
I have never heard of a Durrant? perhaps you can enlighten me?
Who finance the start-up if not Wall Street? How many are actually started from private funds? all ended up on the Exchange. If it is successful, why did they sell their business to the banks?
STROHHHHHH!
Can someone give a fast answer to the video title question?