3:35: The fact that Irish are *owning* the stereotype that all of them do, in fact, say “Top o’ the morning!” is hilarious. And somewhat heartwarming! Own it, Ireland!
Can we just appreciate how arthur weasley, always jups in to the rescue whether in this scene or the scene where he stopped the death eater in the batlle of hogwarts he's the og of the order of the phoenix
It's absolutely wild to me that the director of this film hated the book. I just can't understand how that could happen. They have to choose directors who like the book when doing movie adaptations.
i think its make sense that way. If the director is a fan and love the book so much, it can affect the directing, and the outcome might not this good. An outsider will have a more callous mind.
@@vuTRAN-tx5bg exactly. Someone who loves the book might not be able to compile it well. They need to adapt a lot for the movies compared to the books. And compared to most other movies Harry Potter did a great job with that
I didn't know that,but I have to admit that it was one of the best movies of the franchise when it comes to direction. So "rich", so interesting. It was perfect.
While I really liked the visuals in this clip, the book really went into much greater detail about the events concerning the match itself and the aftermath. Maybe there was some parts left out of this clip. I think I'll go back and reread the whole thing. thanks for posting
I didn't know that people believe that this was the worst movie when it comes to directing. I found the directing so interesting, so "rich", so "alive". All the scenes were so intense,very bright colors and the scene in the cemetery when Harry reunited with Voldemort was a masterpiece. I really don't understand why people hate it. Even the producers said that they wanted a british director who has a very theatrical way of directing. I think Mike Newell nailed it.
It's very simple. Newell failed in one very crucial area: respecting the source material. I didn't get it at first because I only watched the movies as a kid, but after reading the books, this movie is so much worse. Though it's still not my least favorite.
There's no logic to this shit. Isn't everyone at that world cup a wizard? How are 6 wizards going to hold 60,000 wizards hostage like that? That's like 6 dudes with guns holding the entire canadian army hostage? I mean it's plausible tbh
@@hansolo631 the wand isnt just a weapon its a tool. Some can use it to specialize in fighting. For most like women, children, civillians in general, they use if for non-fighting purposes. And knowing the spells isnt enough because the wand movement matters like how you flick your wrist etc. Also if youre skilled enough you dont even have to chant the spells. So imagine a highly-trained terrorist against a bunch of civillians with pistols they dont even know how to use properly. My take on why this scene is off put is because its a world cup, shouldn't there be loads of security? I guess the deatheaters have taken care of them prior but it should have been shown for a bit at least.
@@hansolo631well they are powerful death eaters using forbidden unforgivable curses against thousands of middling to novice non-combative wizards. A more apt comparison is 6 soldiers with automatic weapons against an army of knights with only swords
@strashinsky Yeah. Sadly, they were already basically over budget (which is why there were no Beasts or curses in the Third Task). They had to make a difficult choice of what to focus on, and this was probably the correct one. I'm not saying I wasn't disappointed as a kid when they skipped it, but I get it now.
I can't help but agree. Probably not everyone in the camp can use magic, some might just be relatives and friends of magic users. But how tf did those death eaters not blitzed on sight?
@@hamsterfromabove8905 It's not that lol everyone in this camp knows magic but the thing is, Death Eaters use powerful dark magic. Death Eaters can take on 1,000 wizards by themselves. At this time, Harry and the rest of the young Wizards like him only use magic where it disarms you but these Death Eaters? They are using their dark magic to kill and they can easily counter the spells Harry learned from Hogwarts. They have parents in this camp too the best thing you can do is to keep your kids safe that's probably why they didn't fight the Death Eaters. And don't think Death Eaters are uneducated. Most of them were recruited by Voldemort when he was Tom Riddle in Hogwarts. He recruited all the Slytherin who went rogue.
@@peytonsmith1062 honestly, it's just very vague worldbuilding that allows all that stuff to work. the closest comparison is a place where absolutely everyone is taught martial arts to a high degree, and a small minority study it to a ridiculously high degree, but everyone can still fight. we're shown multiple times that adults can hold their own with death eaters - not aurors or particularly trained adults, but teachers (often of extremely passive subjects) and parents. and it's never established that death eaters are in essence more skilled in magic, just that they're amoral and have no compunction about being profoundly vicious. a small gang of death eaters would be trolleyed by a thousand adult wizards, given the chance, which is probably why the death eaters don't hang around or fight head-on. of course the films remove the stuff in the books about casting spells wordlessly, which by this point none of the younger characters have been trained to do anyway and is the real point at which magic becomes legitimately offensive or defensive; hard to get the drop on a death eater when you're essentially yelling "I'm shooting you now!" a second before attacking
They should put cushions all over the place and maybe security guards. What if there were pranksters who put rocks around, someone could get seriously injured? Also, what happens if you don't let go at the right time or don't let go at all? Do you end up in another dimension never to see your friends again?
Aren't there American Wizards as well? I forgot the history of American Wizards or when it started but I'm sure by the time quidditch happened here the American Wizards' history already started.
The Goblet of Fire had the worst directing of any of the films, Mike Newell (director) only read 20 pages of the book and then stopped as he found it boring.
I will never understand why Mike Newell thought it was a good idea to skip the entire Quidditch World Cup match. In fact, there's quite a lot of things he messed up in this movie.
And destroyed in film. A very key moments were cut into disparate pieces. No horrors of death eaters, just like a group of young batards showing off themselves. What a waste!
@catfamilyhistory4957 The important stuff is covered. The Quidditch Cup, while it would have been a great scene, would have slowed the pace of the movie. The film already used up almost its entire budget, which is why the maze did not have any dangerous threats in it as they did not have the money left for it.
@Tesseract.2012 Probably not so much in 2005. Live action Tv shows in 2005 did not get the kind of budget to show off the Quidditch Cup or Triwizard Tournament. If you look back in 2005, most of the big shows were not sci-fi or fantasy. The only really shows of that kind that were doing well around then would have been Supernatural (season 1), Smalleville (season 4-5), or Battlestar Galactica (Season 2). While good shows, the effects were nothing extraordinary. Goblet of Fire was better as a movie than it would have been as a TV shoe at that time.
I don't particularly remember, but in the books, is it correct that Harry's wand conjured that dark mark? that's why he became a suspect but of course that just lasted minutes because it was proven Harry didn't conjured it. Am I remembering correctly?
My theory is that they didn't have enough time to practice their chant, so when the attack happened, one guy was saying it correctly but because of all the noise, the rest couldn't hear him, and they just gave up and started chanting gibberish.
Crouch saying "WHICH OF YOU CONJURED IT??? DO NOT LIE!!!" and "ALL OF YOU....THIS WAY!!" always makes me think he's gonna kill everyone he comes across for conjuring the Dark Mark....
Oh how life was different when I first watched this. 13 years old & still in highschool ^^ I could stay up all night play halo 2 on xboxlive with my friends. Good times when Harry Potter was still new & not destroyed by it's own creator trying to be still relevant.
@cecilwhinter The woke writers & production houses destroyed Harry Potter. the creator do not hold movie rights. and she is fighting the wokes who got their genders confu$ed. JK Rowling is already relevant as one of the best storytellers.
@cecilwhinter JK Rowling is one of the best storytellers. She doesn't need $tupid news to stay relevant. and she doesn't own movie rights. The production houses destroyed Harry Potter by adding Wo Ke stuff.
If this movie were released in the 90's or before that, then that would be amazing, but in 2005? There have already been a lot of amazing movies that came out before that.
7:31, and what if they stupefied each other? I'm no military expert but I learned on the news about this family who was... by rebels, that you should never form a circle and instead use an L formation to attack otherwise you'll hit each other.
I only liked this film because it took a seriously dark turn and it was refreshing. If you've read the book youll know Goblet of Fire was very weak in terms of plot, i dont care what any PotterHead says. I think the director at least spinned it best he could.
1:06 hmm never realized this but seeing how the shadows are displayed so clearly behind them you can obviously tell they're looking at an empty field... and the whole background looks laughably cgi xD
Bruh, Harry had already faced off with Voldemort himself, giant killing chess pieces, devil's snare, a massive 3-headed dog, centaurs, a basilisk with the ability to kill just by looking into its eyes, hundreds of dementors, hundreds of big spiders including Aragog the massive one, a Hippogriff and a werewolf.... why the hell is he running around like he can't help himself? Flinging and flopping around the ground like a giant earthquake has hit the area when all those other people have no problem staying on their feet... then falls again and gets kicked in the head. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Is it reasonable to see that Lucius was actually warning Harry in his own twisted way of the Death Eaters' arrival? In the end of it all he was fully willing to leave the Voldemort army with his family...
All the major wizards in the world, and they had a golden opportunity to capture all the Death Eaters at once - and they all run in all directions. Pathetic.
Yall in the comments need to check out Quidditch Champions. It's fast paced abd you literally tackle and beat tf out of your opponents. If your a Beater then you can control the balls it's cool af.
Death Eaters. They're like roaches the Wizard World can't get rid of them. They knew Harry Potter at the world cup. They didn't care to kill him when they had the chance
Not unless Harry Putalenko universe has mind control powers, and they can use this on anyone and make the world a good place by taking away everyone's freedom of will because freedom of will is what brings chaos to the world.
maybe and probably just to cause some chaos and fear among the people that were there gathered ??? any other reason and explanation i can't think off, and com up with.
I mean, everyone except the two Diggorys and Arthur Weasley could have been killed… but never mind. They’re used to almost dying at least once every year! 🤣🤣
They totally butchered the story from the books, & in this scene, they should be falling standing up from like 4-5 feet, & falling by loosing balance & crashing into each other. Can you believe that they excluded the highlight of the worldcup, the finals match itself from the movie ? The whole point Harry goes to live with weasly family is for the world-cup match! & there is hilarious scene of Arthur crashing into Petunias kitchen, Fred & George & Ron come to take Harry as well... Winky, the houseelves in Hogwarts kitchen, Veelas, wandmaker's visit, Serius hiding in cave where three kids go & give him food... well over Like 20 minor characters & countless moments that make up characters of Ron & Harry, Snape, Dumbledore, Fudge,... all meaningful moments were forgotten like trash... Only dear Hermione was preserved & rather improved at expense of others... They mutilated the original story/characters into piece of dying flesh & the author just watched....
This film i consider to be the blandest of them all. Just a teen angst movie. I lOvE mAgIc Who wrote that line. Youve been learning it for three years. The look of the death eaters us a bit too similar to....yeah bad choice of costume. David Tennants performance was perfect though.
I am literally so sure that the director of the film hated the book a lot of people has said that but literally I know it's not easy to film all scenes that JK Rowling his written in the book but you cannot just create your own scenes which aren't even written in the book all the others movies like I'm not comparing the directors I am not comparing the works but how can you just create your scenes which are not even written in the book like the scene only it is no way written that had he was taken away by the minister like that.....
And horcrux magic black seriously horcrux deathly hallow be are fuck tom riddle is never harry potter priority encantatem secion reservity horcrux magic pro players is voldemort name the tom marvollo riddle magic black...
They totally butchered the story from the books, & in this scene, they should be falling standing up from like 4-5 feet, & falling by loosing balance & crashing into each other rather than falling like diving from an airplane.... Can you believe that they excluded the highlight of the worldcup, the finals match itself from the movie ? The whole point Harry goes to live with weasly family is for the world-cup match! & there is hilarious scene of Arthur crashing into Petunias kitchen, Fred & George & Ron come to take Harry as well... Winky, the houseelves in Hogwarts kitchen, Veelas, wandmaker's visit, Serius hiding in cave where three kids go & give him food... well over Like 20 minor characters & countless moments that make up characters of Ron & Harry, Snape, Dumbledore, Fudge,... all meaningful moments were forgotten like trash... Only dear Hermione was preserved, rather improved at expense of others... They mutilated the original story/characters into piece of dying flesh & the author just watched....
And you wonder why the book's about 750 pages long. Most of that got scrapped from time, and while it's disappointing that the (enormously expensive) Quidditch scene wasn't shown, the whole side plot with SPEW goes literally nowhere except the Winky stuff, the Arthur scene while funny isn't necessary, and the whole side plot with George and Fred and Bagman is filler at best. The movie's already over two and a half hours long and that's without any of the monsters or spells in the labyrinth shown. You're looking at another 45-60 minutes at least, and no child, the target audience, is going to want to sit through a movie longer than the Seven Samurai.
They hype up the quiddich world cup so much, just to legit skip the entire match, and to add insult to injury they dont even say who won 🤣 also wtf was with 0:47 why did harry, ron and Hermione free fall and faceplant but mr weasly, mr diggory and cedric are just casually strolling down the invisible path 🤣 so dumb
Why ppl saying this was the worst Harry Potter movie? I think it was the best one. I didnt read the books but Harry Potter series started to be dark and gritty with this movie. It has a really good story. It kills important characters such as Cedric and the reviving Voldemort scene was scary as hell when i was a child. Duel was epic as well. Ball scene, underwater games, dragon flight maze scene was so memorable i even recall it today. I did like the new sidecharacters as well. And gods plot twist was awesome. I think people are being close minded and disliking this movie saying book was better.
@@siegedoyle True, there are multiple schools but only one Hogwarts. There's Ilvermorny in the United States, Beauxbatons in France, Durmstrang in Bulgaria, Castelobruxo in Brazil, Koldovstoretz in Russia, Mahoutokoro in Japan, and Uagadou in Uganda. We learn about Beauxbatons and Durmstrang in Goblet of fire when they bring students from those schools to Hogwarts for the Triwizard Tournament. We learn about Ilvermorny from Pottermore and it is mentioned in Fantastic Beasts. We learn about Uagadou in Hogwarts legacy from a student your character can befriend that came from there. The rest are exclusively mentioned on Pottermore unless I'm mistaken.
@@davidhartley9115 He actually did it because the director of Prisoner of Azkaban talked him into it and convinced him that he could cut it down to just one movie instead of a 2 parter.
@@trueblue6201 I know, I am just saying that considering how Goblet of Fire turned out, he should returned to direct or maybe even split into two movies.
this movie in my opinion is the worst of the entire series. It's a bit American, which is why it lost the magic compared to the first two films (which were magical and mystical) and it's amazing - the Scottish Prisoner of Azkaban. 😉
@cultureguide3660 How exactly is it American? It is literally the first one to be directed by an English director (Columbus is American and Cuaron is Mexican). I would say Philosopher's Stone is the one that feels most American in the series (not the least of which because they had the slightly Americanized Sorcer Stone version).
Honestly, I didn't really detect anything "different" in the styles of any of them. The later ones were darker, but then, the stories got darker, so I expected it.
@@trueblue6201Don't get me wrong, I mean the fact that in the first two parts we had British locations, perfectly created characters and you could feel the magic, warmth and at the same time there was a lot of Britishness despite the American director. Goblet of Fire, due to the long plot, could have been made in two parts, but they made one and due to the time it was not possible to refine the film so magically, so I had the impression that I was watching an American film because there were no British locations (apart from the scene from train), the soundtrack wasn't magical either, and those scenes from the Yule Ball. I'm just saying that this movie was the most similar to the American movie in the entire series, if you understand me correctly. Overall, the movie was still very good, but it was inferior to the entire series. but of course everyone has their own opinion and everyone likes something different.😉
A bit american😂😂 euro trash clown trying desperately to get attention by bashing america when no american had anything to do with the direction of this film
"what man harry...who?"
"i dunno, looked like the doctah but i wasn't shore"
Lmaooo I love the way he talks
Dumbledore said calmly
Doctor Who, Harry?
2:54 i wish at this moment harry said "do you still keep your wand in your cane?" then pulled on it and let it fell off the railing.
Then Harry Putraguise would be arrested and sent to Azkaban.
3:35: The fact that Irish are *owning* the stereotype that all of them do, in fact, say “Top o’ the morning!” is hilarious.
And somewhat heartwarming! Own it, Ireland!
Can we just appreciate how arthur weasley, always jups in to the rescue whether in this scene or the scene where he stopped the death eater in the batlle of hogwarts he's the og of the order of the phoenix
It's absolutely wild to me that the director of this film hated the book. I just can't understand how that could happen. They have to choose directors who like the book when doing movie adaptations.
i think its make sense that way. If the director is a fan and love the book so much, it can affect the directing, and the outcome might not this good. An outsider will have a more callous mind.
@@vuTRAN-tx5bg exactly. Someone who loves the book might not be able to compile it well. They need to adapt a lot for the movies compared to the books. And compared to most other movies Harry Potter did a great job with that
This is the worst of the films so it’s definitely not a help he changed so much and you should have fans doing the direction.
I didn't know that,but I have to admit that it was one of the best movies of the franchise when it comes to direction. So "rich", so interesting. It was perfect.
@@micktheman6 who said that? :)) i love this and all other films
While I really liked the visuals in this clip, the book really went into much greater detail about the events concerning the match itself and the aftermath. Maybe there was some parts left out of this clip. I think I'll go back and reread the whole thing.
thanks for posting
2:02 FEET OFF THE TABLE
I didn't know that people believe that this was the worst movie when it comes to directing. I found the directing so interesting, so "rich", so "alive". All the scenes were so intense,very bright colors and the scene in the cemetery when Harry reunited with Voldemort was a masterpiece. I really don't understand why people hate it. Even the producers said that they wanted a british director who has a very theatrical way of directing. I think Mike Newell nailed it.
It's very simple. Newell failed in one very crucial area: respecting the source material. I didn't get it at first because I only watched the movies as a kid, but after reading the books, this movie is so much worse. Though it's still not my least favorite.
They should have just rehired the Mexican guy who directed the 3rd movie to direct this one.
Harry is always defenceless. Without his friends where will he be
He literally said most of his victories were just luck so what’s your point?
There's no logic to this shit. Isn't everyone at that world cup a wizard? How are 6 wizards going to hold 60,000 wizards hostage like that? That's like 6 dudes with guns holding the entire canadian army hostage? I mean it's plausible tbh
@@hansolo631 Fear is a hell of a thing. More so when you act on your worst instincts.
@@hansolo631 the wand isnt just a weapon its a tool. Some can use it to specialize in fighting. For most like women, children, civillians in general, they use if for non-fighting purposes.
And knowing the spells isnt enough because the wand movement matters like how you flick your wrist etc. Also if youre skilled enough you dont even have to chant the spells. So imagine a highly-trained terrorist against a bunch of civillians with pistols they dont even know how to use properly.
My take on why this scene is off put is because its a world cup, shouldn't there be loads of security? I guess the deatheaters have taken care of them prior but it should have been shown for a bit at least.
@@hansolo631well they are powerful death eaters using forbidden unforgivable curses against thousands of middling to novice non-combative wizards. A more apt comparison is 6 soldiers with automatic weapons against an army of knights with only swords
I would've really liked to see the whole quiddich match. It probably would've been cool.
@strashinsky Yeah. Sadly, they were already basically over budget (which is why there were no Beasts or curses in the Third Task). They had to make a difficult choice of what to focus on, and this was probably the correct one. I'm not saying I wasn't disappointed as a kid when they skipped it, but I get it now.
Hopefully it's done justice in the TV show.
@@StoicLime Oh boy they better not mess that TV show up!
@@roberto9094 fear no more! harry is now a chinese trans
@@SonOfTheChinChin so im gonna hear petroleum instead great...
Harry's character is sometimes silly, everyone got away but he kept turning around until he fell over.
Good thing he never got stepped on, stampedes can just be as deadly as any black magic.
lol 1:55 how is the Wesley’s tent better than their house? Is it a rented tent they have at the World Cup?
"Total shambles, as per usual" describes the Weasleys so well
Maybe it’s just the American in me, but if 20 dudes with guns walked into a camp of 10,000 dudes with guns…I guess it’d be a shorter film
I can't help but agree. Probably not everyone in the camp can use magic, some might just be relatives and friends of magic users.
But how tf did those death eaters not blitzed on sight?
@@hamsterfromabove8905 It's not that lol everyone in this camp knows magic but the thing is, Death Eaters use powerful dark magic. Death Eaters can take on 1,000 wizards by themselves. At this time, Harry and the rest of the young Wizards like him only use magic where it disarms you but these Death Eaters? They are using their dark magic to kill and they can easily counter the spells Harry learned from Hogwarts. They have parents in this camp too the best thing you can do is to keep your kids safe that's probably why they didn't fight the Death Eaters. And don't think Death Eaters are uneducated. Most of them were recruited by Voldemort when he was Tom Riddle in Hogwarts. He recruited all the Slytherin who went rogue.
@@peytonsmith1062 Nobody is beating 10 simultaneous expelliarmus. I just can't except the claim that 1 death eater is worth 1000 other wizards.
@@peytonsmith1062 honestly, it's just very vague worldbuilding that allows all that stuff to work. the closest comparison is a place where absolutely everyone is taught martial arts to a high degree, and a small minority study it to a ridiculously high degree, but everyone can still fight. we're shown multiple times that adults can hold their own with death eaters - not aurors or particularly trained adults, but teachers (often of extremely passive subjects) and parents. and it's never established that death eaters are in essence more skilled in magic, just that they're amoral and have no compunction about being profoundly vicious. a small gang of death eaters would be trolleyed by a thousand adult wizards, given the chance, which is probably why the death eaters don't hang around or fight head-on.
of course the films remove the stuff in the books about casting spells wordlessly, which by this point none of the younger characters have been trained to do anyway and is the real point at which magic becomes legitimately offensive or defensive; hard to get the drop on a death eater when you're essentially yelling "I'm shooting you now!" a second before attacking
@@peytonsmith1062lmaoooo brother cmon now. the DE are strong but they can’t take 1000 at once. that’s just silly
Am i the only one that's
noticed that Arthur ALWAYS knew which twin he was talking to?
One of the best things about Harry Potter was the magic. Gosh, it was SO cool
Harry is me in every situation ever. Why does everyone know what to do always??
I hate how they let the kids fall and
They landed gracefully 😮
They should put cushions all over the place and maybe security guards. What if there were pranksters who put rocks around, someone could get seriously injured?
Also, what happens if you don't let go at the right time or don't let go at all? Do you end up in another dimension never to see your friends again?
5:40 "We make holes in teeth, we make holes in teeth!"
How is it, years later I finally noticed the American flag hanging up behind there tent? 1:40
Mate also 🇮🇳🇺🇬🇮🇪🇮🇹🇧🇬 too
*their
I also just saw this lol
And I thought this was a British movie
Aren't there American Wizards as well? I forgot the history of American Wizards or when it started but I'm sure by the time quidditch happened here the American Wizards' history already started.
This is how you do world building
The Goblet of Fire had the worst directing of any of the films, Mike Newell (director) only read 20 pages of the book and then stopped as he found it boring.
Same I couldn’t finishing reading book so I watch Harry Potter movies instead
I will never understand why Mike Newell thought it was a good idea to skip the entire Quidditch World Cup match. In fact, there's quite a lot of things he messed up in this movie.
If Prison Mike was there they would stand no chance
Good times 👌
1:13 indian flag at harry potter
It was a way of appeasing those who have been afflicted by colonization.
Ireland 🇮🇪
Harry: I love magic
Me: No, you love expelliarmus
I find it funny...that you need to trickshot with magic? They all miss their stupify spells, just by not aiming correctly?? Haha
0:59 me and the boys rollin' up to our 23rd Ren Faire of the season
It was written really well in books🙂
And destroyed in film. A very key moments were cut into disparate pieces. No horrors of death eaters, just like a group of young batards showing off themselves. What a waste!
@catfamilyhistory4957 The important stuff is covered. The Quidditch Cup, while it would have been a great scene, would have slowed the pace of the movie. The film already used up almost its entire budget, which is why the maze did not have any dangerous threats in it as they did not have the money left for it.
If it was done as TV series then, more hours of book content likely would’ve been shown.
@Tesseract.2012 Probably not so much in 2005. Live action Tv shows in 2005 did not get the kind of budget to show off the Quidditch Cup or Triwizard Tournament. If you look back in 2005, most of the big shows were not sci-fi or fantasy. The only really shows of that kind that were doing well around then would have been Supernatural (season 1), Smalleville (season 4-5), or Battlestar Galactica (Season 2). While good shows, the effects were nothing extraordinary. Goblet of Fire was better as a movie than it would have been as a TV shoe at that time.
@@Tesseract.2012just one of the many reasons we are all looking forward to its release.
Going to one of those games looks fun...
After four years and our boy is still trance by the Power of Magic✨💎🥂
I don't particularly remember, but in the books, is it correct that Harry's wand conjured that dark mark? that's why he became a suspect but of course that just lasted minutes because it was proven Harry didn't conjured it. Am I remembering correctly?
yes
Surprised I never looked into it, But does anyone know what the death eaters are chanting?
Long live Harambe
Baba Ganoush ?
@@planetbluray I knew it
Ra Ra Rasputin lover of the Russian queen.
My theory is that they didn't have enough time to practice their chant, so when the attack happened, one guy was saying it correctly but because of all the noise, the rest couldn't hear him, and they just gave up and started chanting gibberish.
Our Harry is the best seeker.
Wish David Tennent had a bigger role in Harry Potter. He would’ve made a great villain over the course of the films
0:21
oh screw it!
If you read the book, you'll find out that this movie had the potential to be a thousand times better.
No one cares
@@dmoney8602 You cared enough to watch this video in 2024!
David Tennant played the Doctor the same yr in 2005.
Crouch saying "WHICH OF YOU CONJURED IT??? DO NOT LIE!!!" and "ALL OF YOU....THIS WAY!!" always makes me think he's gonna kill everyone he comes across for conjuring the Dark Mark....
He knows that there is a high chance it is his son that created it, and want to have a plausible decoy.
If you ever think you're stupid, Crouch accused Harry Potter of being a death eater. The one person least likely to be a death eater.
@@bookkeeper7 No wonder Barty Jr. said "And they say I'm mad!" when he was high on polyjuice potion, pretending to be Mad-Eye Moody
Oh how life was different when I first watched this. 13 years old & still in highschool ^^ I could stay up all night play halo 2 on xboxlive with my friends. Good times when Harry Potter was still new & not destroyed by it's own creator trying to be still relevant.
What exactly makes you say that Harry Potter was 'destroyed'?
Story is still the same and always will be. Nothing has changed and nothing will.
I think you have been brainwashed by leftwing lunatics
@cecilwhinter The woke writers & production houses destroyed Harry Potter. the creator do not hold movie rights. and she is fighting the wokes who got their genders confu$ed. JK Rowling is already relevant as one of the best storytellers.
@cecilwhinter JK Rowling is one of the best storytellers. She doesn't need $tupid news to stay relevant. and she doesn't own movie rights. The production houses destroyed Harry Potter by adding Wo Ke stuff.
It's honestly hard to believe this movie was released in 2005.
Why is that so difficult for you?
same here
Bros, chillax. I'm just praising this movie.
better CGI than most movies today
If this movie were released in the 90's or before that, then that would be amazing, but in 2005? There have already been a lot of amazing movies that came out before that.
I couldn't get into this film the same way as the others.
Me too. I would even go as to say that this is the 2nd worst Harry Putraneska movie ever made.
Lol all of them fell and the others landed gracefully:)
So you're telling me hundreds of wizards (some quite powerful) couldn't fight off the Death Eaters??
Fear is a powerful thing
7:31, and what if they stupefied each other? I'm no military expert but I learned on the news about this family who was... by rebels, that you should never form a circle and instead use an L formation to attack otherwise you'll hit each other.
Seeing Dr who as a death eater is just weird lol
WHO was that man
I heard he's a very good doctor. A definite article you might say
Barty crouch junior
Death Eaters
1:59 Fred & George.
What were the Death Eaters chanting as they marched through the camp?
I only liked this film because it took a seriously dark turn and it was refreshing. If you've read the book youll know Goblet of Fire was very weak in terms of plot, i dont care what any PotterHead says. I think the director at least spinned it best he could.
If only some of them could use magic
Don’t give a fuck what you book reader think, this is one of the best film in the series
1:06 hmm never realized this but seeing how the shadows are displayed so clearly behind them you can obviously tell they're looking at an empty field... and the whole background looks laughably cgi xD
You didn't have to attack Harry, Ron, & Hermione like that they're just kid😤.
Bruh, Harry had already faced off with Voldemort himself, giant killing chess pieces, devil's snare, a massive 3-headed dog, centaurs, a basilisk with the ability to kill just by looking into its eyes, hundreds of dementors, hundreds of big spiders including Aragog the massive one, a Hippogriff and a werewolf.... why the hell is he running around like he can't help himself? Flinging and flopping around the ground like a giant earthquake has hit the area when all those other people have no problem staying on their feet... then falls again and gets kicked in the head. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
I really like this scene, but why did the death eaters had to attack their campsite at parent reason I didn’t see the house elf that came with it
David Tannet In Harry Potter Goblet Of Fire
Is it reasonable to see that Lucius was actually warning Harry in his own twisted way of the Death Eaters' arrival? In the end of it all he was fully willing to leave the Voldemort army with his family...
All the major wizards in the world, and they had a golden opportunity to capture all the Death Eaters at once - and they all run in all directions. Pathetic.
Yall in the comments need to check out Quidditch Champions. It's fast paced abd you literally tackle and beat tf out of your opponents. If your a Beater then you can control the balls it's cool af.
What do the death eaters chant?
Death Eaters. They're like roaches the Wizard World can't get rid of them.
They knew Harry Potter at the world cup. They didn't care to kill him when they had the chance
It’s almost like it’s just a book written by woman in a coffee shop…
Not unless Harry Putalenko universe has mind control powers, and they can use this on anyone and make the world a good place by taking away everyone's freedom of will because freedom of will is what brings chaos to the world.
Stay way from those death Easter sorry for harry potter family
Yes Viktor Krtsm
5:41 Here’s what I don’t understand, why would Voldemort’s Death Eaters want to attack the Quidditch World Cup? What was their reason?
maybe and probably just to cause some chaos and fear among the people that were there gathered ??? any other reason and explanation i can't think off, and com up with.
Skull black my name is tom marvollo riddle is magic black horcrux never harry potter for yours jk rowling stone and dethily hallows ok 👍
I mean, everyone except the two Diggorys and Arthur Weasley could have been killed… but never mind. They’re used to almost dying at least once every year! 🤣🤣
They totally butchered the story from the books,
& in this scene, they should be falling standing up from like 4-5 feet, & falling by loosing balance & crashing into each other.
Can you believe that they excluded the highlight of the worldcup, the finals match itself from the movie ? The whole point Harry goes to live with weasly family is for the world-cup match!
& there is hilarious scene of Arthur crashing into Petunias kitchen, Fred & George & Ron come to take Harry as well...
Winky, the houseelves in Hogwarts kitchen, Veelas, wandmaker's visit, Serius hiding in cave where three kids go & give him food...
well over Like 20 minor characters & countless moments that make up characters of Ron & Harry, Snape, Dumbledore, Fudge,... all meaningful moments were forgotten like trash... Only dear Hermione was preserved & rather improved at expense of others...
They mutilated the original story/characters into piece of dying flesh & the author just watched....
7:41 Doctor Who conjured it not Harry
This film i consider to be the blandest of them all. Just a teen angst movie.
I lOvE mAgIc
Who wrote that line. Youve been learning it for three years. The look of the death eaters us a bit too similar to....yeah bad choice of costume.
David Tennants performance was perfect though.
It's only a bad choice of costume if it's white.
Indian flag ♥️😍did anyone notice ??
1:12 So india is playing quidditch world cup but not the fifa world cup.
India is most developed nation in the magic world 😂😂
RED LIGHT
I am literally so sure that the director of the film hated the book a lot of people has said that but literally I know it's not easy to film all scenes that JK Rowling his written in the book but you cannot just create your own scenes which aren't even written in the book all the others movies like I'm not comparing the directors I am not comparing the works but how can you just create your scenes which are not even written in the book like the scene only it is no way written that had he was taken away by the minister like that.....
Best Harry Potter film
And horcrux magic black seriously horcrux deathly hallow be are fuck tom riddle is never harry potter priority encantatem secion reservity horcrux magic pro players is voldemort name the tom marvollo riddle magic black...
They totally butchered the story from the books,
& in this scene, they should be falling standing up from like 4-5 feet, & falling by loosing balance & crashing into each other rather than falling like diving from an airplane....
Can you believe that they excluded the highlight of the worldcup, the finals match itself from the movie ? The whole point Harry goes to live with weasly family is for the world-cup match!
& there is hilarious scene of Arthur crashing into Petunias kitchen, Fred & George & Ron come to take Harry as well...
Winky, the houseelves in Hogwarts kitchen, Veelas, wandmaker's visit, Serius hiding in cave where three kids go & give him food...
well over Like 20 minor characters & countless moments that make up characters of Ron & Harry, Snape, Dumbledore, Fudge,... all meaningful moments were forgotten like trash... Only dear Hermione was preserved, rather improved at expense of others...
They mutilated the original story/characters into piece of dying flesh & the author just watched....
And you wonder why the book's about 750 pages long. Most of that got scrapped from time, and while it's disappointing that the (enormously expensive) Quidditch scene wasn't shown, the whole side plot with SPEW goes literally nowhere except the Winky stuff, the Arthur scene while funny isn't necessary, and the whole side plot with George and Fred and Bagman is filler at best.
The movie's already over two and a half hours long and that's without any of the monsters or spells in the labyrinth shown. You're looking at another 45-60 minutes at least, and no child, the target audience, is going to want to sit through a movie longer than the Seven Samurai.
They hype up the quiddich world cup so much, just to legit skip the entire match, and to add insult to injury they dont even say who won 🤣 also wtf was with 0:47 why did harry, ron and Hermione free fall and faceplant but mr weasly, mr diggory and cedric are just casually strolling down the invisible path 🤣 so dumb
1:14 what the indian flag doing there?🫡🫡🫡
Kelane hori poddar...
My dad used to call him by this name. Not kelane just Hori Poddar 😂
Why ppl saying this was the worst Harry Potter movie? I think it was the best one. I didnt read the books but Harry Potter series started to be dark and gritty with this movie. It has a really good story. It kills important characters such as Cedric and the reviving Voldemort scene was scary as hell when i was a child. Duel was epic as well. Ball scene, underwater games, dragon flight maze scene was so memorable i even recall it today. I did like the new sidecharacters as well. And gods plot twist was awesome. I think people are being close minded and disliking this movie saying book was better.
Indian flag at 1:11, which means Indian wizards/witches exist in HP universe.
I mean, there are multiple Hogwarts 'schools in the cannon universes. Africa. India. Any of them you can think of really.
@@siegedoyle True, there are multiple schools but only one Hogwarts. There's Ilvermorny in the United States, Beauxbatons in France, Durmstrang in Bulgaria, Castelobruxo in Brazil, Koldovstoretz in Russia, Mahoutokoro in Japan, and Uagadou in Uganda. We learn about Beauxbatons and Durmstrang in Goblet of fire when they bring students from those schools to Hogwarts for the Triwizard Tournament. We learn about Ilvermorny from Pottermore and it is mentioned in Fantastic Beasts. We learn about Uagadou in Hogwarts legacy from a student your character can befriend that came from there. The rest are exclusively mentioned on Pottermore unless I'm mistaken.
@@needle415 they talk about all the school in Hogwarts Legacy if I'm not mistaken 😅😅😅
No one gives a shit about the HP universe. You are trash.
The director of Goblet of Fire made the acting, stunts and film style real cheap. Wasn't a fan!
He actually wasn’t a fan. He only took it on because it’s a title on his resume.
@@davidhartley9115 He actually did it because the director of Prisoner of Azkaban talked him into it and convinced him that he could cut it down to just one movie instead of a 2 parter.
@@trueblue6201If this was the end result, Alfonso Cuaron should have returned to direct, and made Goblet of Fire a two parter movie.
@@matthewescudero4287 Curaon was the one who agreed to keep it as one movie.
@@trueblue6201 I know, I am just saying that considering how Goblet of Fire turned out, he should returned to direct or maybe even split into two movies.
Ahola I’m Shanebearddj Wow Badass
2:51 I just only realized Lucius’s line was foreshadowing Voldemort’s return and attempt to kill Harry in the graveyard.
Worst book to movie adaptation ever.
Cry about it
New movie 🎥 update
1:12 any Indians here?
No, just sleep
a lot of ukrainian flags.
Every country has its own magic government and this was years before the war started
2:25 the DEI cup
This movie was trash since the first minut
this movie in my opinion is the worst of the entire series. It's a bit American, which is why it lost the magic compared to the first two films (which were magical and mystical) and it's amazing - the Scottish Prisoner of Azkaban. 😉
@cultureguide3660 How exactly is it American? It is literally the first one to be directed by an English director (Columbus is American and Cuaron is Mexican). I would say Philosopher's Stone is the one that feels most American in the series (not the least of which because they had the slightly Americanized Sorcer Stone version).
Honestly, I didn't really detect anything "different" in the styles of any of them. The later ones were darker, but then, the stories got darker, so I expected it.
@@trueblue6201Don't get me wrong, I mean the fact that in the first two parts we had British locations, perfectly created characters and you could feel the magic, warmth and at the same time there was a lot of Britishness despite the American director. Goblet of Fire, due to the long plot, could have been made in two parts, but they made one and due to the time it was not possible to refine the film so magically, so I had the impression that I was watching an American film because there were no British locations (apart from the scene from train), the soundtrack wasn't magical either, and those scenes from the Yule Ball. I'm just saying that this movie was the most similar to the American movie in the entire series, if you understand me correctly. Overall, the movie was still very good, but it was inferior to the entire series. but of course everyone has their own opinion and everyone likes something different.😉
A bit american😂😂 euro trash clown trying desperately to get attention by bashing america when no american had anything to do with the direction of this film
You're an absolute idiot @@cultureguide3660