IF by "Normal" you mean "felt like being inside the cannon ball when the cannon was fired"... well... yes. That was a fairly normal RATO... AND certainly more normal than when one or more of the rockets explodes instead of providing positive thrust (which is always an option)... ;o)
The amount of duplicate clips is about as staggering as the amount of 100% fine landings and situations. I tip my hat to your impressive lack of effort.
Well, perfect would have been the undercarriage working properly but for any less than perfect landings I would want that pilot flying the plane. Even turned the engines off before touchdown to limit damage to just the props.
@lonewolfhf - I would say 4:38 is a better point to pick up the whole landing sequence! A bit of a visual lead-in to any incident, wherever possible, helps to give a better picture. After all, in this case, it was the pilot's mastery in lining up his ailing aircraft for landing that gave him a much better outcome - he/she surely had little control once they had impacted the runway at 4.47
I always love the very professional and meticulously uttered whoooo's and OMG's done by the spotters in their fishing stool accompanied by their highly trained wifes that serve the beverages while their husbands give a professional report on any possible mishaps that may happen during the landing.
It is like masturbation. At first, it is okay, even fun. The it becomes embarrassing when you girlfriend comes in and finds you have been doing it over and over. Then it becomes frustrating and starts feeling like you have a hangnail that came off inside your favourite sexy-time sock and it just annoys you! Sexy Sock Sally is not so sexy when she has been used several times in a day and not been washed. This video rather feels this way.
I believe this sequence at 10:14 was made as part of a feature film, so it wasn't actually an 'accident', although it certainly gave that impression. The people running away were all part of the scripted action!
@oldtimer2192 Because it's no text on the clip, I guess you meant my text. It's a big difference to publish a movie or comment a movie. The whole world see exactly the same thing. But the whole world, speak different languages. So complain on other people's spellings is only ridiculous.
Most of these are actually gyrocopters. Sort of a cross between and airplane and a helicopter. They can't hover or fly backward, and the rotors are unpowered.
@@thomasbell7033 I have loved Gyrocopters ever since I saw one in the 2nd Mad Max movie. You still should wear a helmet while testing one you built your self. Many of them now have set ups to power the rotor while taking off. Would be a bad day if a blade came loose and bonked your noggin.
@@juliezzz444 and @barbarajeffries I think it means that it was an unreal / fake / generated video, created on a computer by an Application called Flight Sim.
I had many flights on that poor VC-10 seen being scrapped at LGW after a heavy landing bent the fuselage. Very sad. G-ARTA, if I recall, the prototype test aircraft.
I got to fly in a VC10, once. It's in my private "top 3" list of the most beautiful and airplanes of all time. The other two are Concorde (of course) and the 707. Real shame about G-ARTA.
Some breathtakingly good, some not so good... I couldn't figure out why we needed to see some of them two or three times? Commercial aviation is the safest way to travel! 🥴 😵💫
@@joeyjamison5772 Agreed on all accounts. There's a big BIG difference between "a glorified trained monkey with a stick in his hands" and "an astute and well trained pilot". US Navy '94 - '98, and I've rubbed elbows with the lot... even retired a few helo' pilots by explaining exactly how their craft got off the ground. (lolz) ;o)
I thought that's what a license was for: Evidence that you know what you're doing. The only thing I've ever flown was R/C. But I've designed aircraft & read a few hundred NTSB accident reports. One of the most frequent causes of crashes is 'Failure to continue flying the airplane'. It's unfortunate that often pilots get so engrossed in dealing with a POTENTIAL fatal emergency that they fail to save the day simply by flying the aircraft. One of the most obvious examples, IMHO, is the death of about 9 parachutists, the death of the pilot, and the crash of the aircraft. The plane lost power on takeoff. The parachutists jumped without enough altitude to open their chutes. And the pilot spun in trying to turn back to the airstrip.......with a large empty farm field at the end of the runway. (That was the NTSB's observation, not mine.) There are dozens & dozens of these kinds of accidents. Much of it is just a human condition sort of thing.
@@terrencefoley509 The license (ANY license) can ONLY EVER mean you've completed a series of classes, passing standardized tests and a final exam of some kind with a given lower limit (standard set by associated agencies) to your score(s)... What happens in practice is very much the same as in high school. Going to classes only really forces people to temporarily memorize most of the information given so they can regurgitate it on the tests... THEREAFTER it's quickly and easily forgotten. This is part of why Commercial Pilots have SO MANY standards to keep up, and so many training and testing sessions throughout their careers... Checkrides are scheduled at least tentatively, throughout their careers... and on top of that, they're required to log a "full cycle" of flying (noting especially take-off AND landing the plane) every 90 days... There are regular repeat sessions in the simulators, and with any write-up or a note on their competency made by a check pilot, quizzing senior, or otherwise aviation official, they'll be faced with a mandatory additional session for "re-training"... It's better than firing, most of the time, but there's a persistent need to keep the skills sharp by making them PERFORM the practices as well as regurgitate answers like on a test, written OR verbal. In General Aviation (private pilots and hobby flyers) the standards aren't so strict by rote. No company is banking on a given private license holder to keep from embarrassing them, losing faith of the public, or creating a marketing nightmare... SO nobody's breathing fire and brimstone down a private pilot's neck to make him or her DO the practice or ask any further questions, go to sims or even play simulator games at home... AND nobody much bothers to check when the last full cycle was practiced by a given General Aviator... If you're not competent, you're just going to crash when you get in over your head... AND arguably, at least in the States, the same can be said of a motorcycle license. Passing for the "minimals" to get a license does NOT mean you're safe to have on the road, EVEN with the MSF course. ALL they can really teach is the series of drills and practices that will refine your skills on a motorcycle, BUT after that 2-day course, you're ON YOUR OWN... Those who practice and work a little on their own, build skills and refine their techniques to continue doing better... Many DO go to further classes and courses and even track-days to get better with a motorcycle for the rest of their lives. AND the same is true of pilots... BUT just as many DO NOT... They assume that once they've been taught, they just "know" it... AND they carry on forth until the day comes that they simply aren't skilled or practiced enough to deal with the series of problems at hand... SO a person who went through the classes and regurgitated answers successfully is a glorified trained monkey with a stick in his hands... AND the one who pursues further training, practices and even recruits other pilots to come check his math and chat over his flight plans, even when he plans to take a trip alone, is the one who becomes a great pilot... AND he'll eventually get to more courses while advancing his skills and getting involved in bigger and more sophisticated (and expensive) aircraft. ;o)
That thumbnail shows a plane being scrapped apparently, they said it was a KV-10/DC-10 being scrapped when it had TWO ENGINES ON EACH SIDE WHICH MEANS ITS NOT A DC-10
the helicopter that went down in the ocean @ 14:10, had 5 people onboard, and one of the 4 passenger died by drowning. A lack of improper maintenance was the cause of the crash.
Watching this compilation of aircraft crashes and close calls is a sobering reminder of the risks involved in aviation. The skill and composure of the pilots during these dangerous landings are truly commendable. It's a testament to their training and professionalism that they're able to manage such intense situations. It's also a crucial reminder of the importance of maintaining rigorous safety standards in the industry to minimize these kinds of events. Stay safe up there!
Wilbur Wright did not 'drop out' of high school. He completed the curriculum, but due to his family relocating at about the time of his graduation, he never received his diploma. Orville DID drop out after completing 3 years of high school. This would have been noteworthy these days, but back then is was pretty common, and both brothers would have been considered fairly well educated
Definitely lots of serious accidents. Also a lot of manure as in the airliners doing barrel rolls 100 ft off the ground. Why so many three & fourpeats after 26 min? The guy @6:39 definitely qualifies for the 'Luckiest Man in the World' finals. Also the driver of the bus @9:43. @14:45, I've flown Latam in 2021. Their safety record is actually very good now. Nice planes also.
Can someone please explain what is "Aircraft Crashes and Close Calls - Dangerous Plane Landings - EMERGENCY LANDING" about military aircraft landing on unprepared or grass strips just tlike they are designed to do is? Or how about putting voice overs on Flight Sim footage?
No way man it happened cause I was standing right there its just not possible that any other plane would do it but it did happen Honest to trump it really did happen!! Wings were destroyed too
Could we trouble you to check your editing? You seem to use a lot of the same footage albeit with different camera angles, recycled footage across multiple videos, and as others have mentioned, repeat footage.
@@RedTrex9 I suspect the plane was scrap, and the building was going to be demolished anyway. If that's the case, it would be WAY cheaper than building a full size set and a fake plane. You could do it in miniature for less, but it wouldn't look real.
INCREIBLE DE QUE ESTAMOS AGUANTANDO DE ESTAS BANDAS ARMADOS QUE NOS BLOQUEN EL CAMINO: Mi video se llama - Robotizado con CD4017 , NE555 Pilotos Con esto funciona mucha maquineria solo. Andre❤
No.... seriously....we can drag it out by just repeating clips over and over and over.... nobody will notice... and even if they do, they'll just keep watching....
Home-made helicopter pilots... we salute you... during your brief years on this earth
Give him a Darwin Award... 😢😁
@@mikaelbiilmann6826I looked at the one tethered to the ground and thought 'good grief! What on earth were you thinking?'
@@coolhand1964 😁
Mmm... The later in life you start, the more years you will have! 😋
same clips played 3 or 4 times, Normal landings speeded up and blatantly obvious fake clips mixed in too. well done
Oh, and you forgot, “the guy stole every one of the videos from other channels on RUclips”.
@@wcolby Right, but were else could one find enough to make a video? Besides, those were all stolen from other videos also
Every time I click on one of these, I know it’s clickbait+mostly previously seen. Get used to it
@@Dennco2000😅😅😅😅
Thanks
Actually, many of these are just successful emergency landings after engine or landing gear failures. Kudos to the pilots.
You should call this the “Repeat Special”
yeah talk about padding it out, there was no need for it.
With honorable mentions to the speeded-up videos with the Alvin and the Chipmunks voices ant the two obviously FAKE vids.
I havent seen some of these. Not every one is a loser who has seen every video in the history of the internet. Touch grass ffs.
What a masterful landining without front gear with Iranian B727👏
The skill it takes to recover from some of those situations is nothing short of miraculous.
The lack of skill required to get into some of those situations is nothing short of moronic...
My desire to fly has been completely left me after watching these kinds of videos for the last few years!
IF by "Normal" you mean "felt like being inside the cannon ball when the cannon was fired"... well... yes. That was a fairly normal RATO... AND certainly more normal than when one or more of the rockets explodes instead of providing positive thrust (which is always an option)... ;o)
Try gliding with winch launch. That was fun, especially on steep climb and cable snapped.
The amount of duplicate clips is about as staggering as the amount of 100% fine landings and situations. I tip my hat to your impressive lack of effort.
Round of applause for the pilot at 4:47 though, that was perfect
That time air fance 447😢
Yes, this was a beautiful landing !
(Remember: "any landing that you can walk away from, is a good landing" ❗
😁
Cheers from Iceland 🇮🇸
-K.
Well, perfect would have been the undercarriage working properly but for any less than perfect landings I would want that pilot flying the plane. Even turned the engines off before touchdown to limit damage to just the props.
@lonewolfhf - I would say 4:38 is a better point to pick up the whole landing sequence! A bit of a visual lead-in to any incident, wherever possible, helps to give a better picture.
After all, in this case, it was the pilot's mastery in lining up his ailing aircraft for landing that gave him a much better outcome - he/she surely had little control once they had impacted the runway at 4.47
Nice flare on that 3/4 Spitfire landing.
I always love the very professional and meticulously uttered whoooo's and OMG's done by the spotters in their fishing stool accompanied by their highly trained wifes that serve the beverages while their husbands give a professional report on any possible mishaps that may happen during the landing.
So many duplicates
I really began to get p155ed off with the number of repeats but it did take me 30 mins 🤣
It is like masturbation. At first, it is okay, even fun. The it becomes embarrassing when you girlfriend comes in and finds you have been doing it over and over. Then it becomes frustrating and starts feeling like you have a hangnail that came off inside your favourite sexy-time sock and it just annoys you! Sexy Sock Sally is not so sexy when she has been used several times in a day and not been washed. This video rather feels this way.
Yes.
A good half-hour's compilation... a shame about the repeats!
Bravo Zulu FedEx B-757 flight crew! Superior airmanship. Glad you're ok. We're all proud of you.
1:06 “Planes can’t drift!” This guy:
The Skill taken to keep replaying the same Clips over and over is amazing !😂
Homemade helicopter pilots aren’t here for a long time , their here for a good time 🤪
LMAO at the fake clip at 30:25
Standard procedure. Makes for a speedy exit of the passengers
I believe this sequence at 10:14 was made as part of a feature film, so it wasn't actually an 'accident', although it certainly gave that impression. The people running away were all part of the scripted action!
Yes indeed, for the movie Tenet.
TENET
So what’s the deal you just post the same accidents from different angles and call it good. WOW just a masterpiece of cinematography.
How do you play the same clip so many times did you even review this once before uploading it ?
Good, but too many repeat clips from earlier in the same video.
A good idea is: sheck your own video, before you publish it on RUclips.
Spelling should also be checked.
@oldtimer2192 Because it's no text on the clip, I guess you meant my text. It's a big difference to publish a movie or comment a movie. The whole world see exactly the same thing. But the whole world, speak different languages. So complain on other people's spellings is only ridiculous.
Too much work apparently. This channel is always like this, and if it gets enough dislikes, maybe banned to the good of all
dozens and dozens of repeats🙄 but still a good compilation.
The people that build diy helicopters are insane
Most of these are actually gyrocopters. Sort of a cross between and airplane and a helicopter. They can't hover or fly backward, and the rotors are unpowered.
Ils ne peuvent pas voler aussi@@thomasbell7033
@@thomasbell7033 I have loved Gyrocopters ever since I saw one in the 2nd Mad Max movie.
You still should wear a helmet while testing one you built your self.
Many of them now have set ups to power the rotor while taking off.
Would be a bad day if a blade came loose and bonked your noggin.
15:35 looks like a normal RATO (rocket assisted takeoff). No problem there. Still, very cool.
Naw, That was burning off excess oil prior to laying down a fresh coat of asphalt.
And the one at 30:40 was definitely a Flight Sim one!
Yeah, cheapens the entire video. Stopped watching after that, as was BS.
What does that mean? Flight Sim?
@@juliezzz444Flight Simulator
I wondered about that....🤔
@@juliezzz444 and @barbarajeffries I think it means that it was an unreal / fake / generated video, created on a computer by an Application called Flight Sim.
I had many flights on that poor VC-10 seen being scrapped at LGW after a heavy landing bent the fuselage. Very sad. G-ARTA, if I recall, the prototype test aircraft.
I got to fly in a VC10, once. It's in my private "top 3" list of the most beautiful and airplanes of all time. The other two are Concorde (of course) and the 707. Real shame about G-ARTA.
@@coriscotupi Never flew Concord, unfortunately. Poor old G-ARTA
Agree. Beautiful plane.
Absolute brilliant piloting at 22.
Some breathtakingly good, some not so good... I couldn't figure out why we needed to see some of them two or three times?
Commercial aviation is the safest way to travel! 🥴 😵💫
Yes - I found myself saying "What - again! We've already seen that twice!"
Remember, just because you're in the pilot's seat doesn't necessarily mean you know what you're doing!
SPOKEN LIKE A TRUE A&P
@@dannyabbott4352 I served in the USAF, and most of the pilots were pretty good, but there were some I wouldn't get into an airplane with.
@@joeyjamison5772 Agreed on all accounts. There's a big BIG difference between "a glorified trained monkey with a stick in his hands" and "an astute and well trained pilot". US Navy '94 - '98, and I've rubbed elbows with the lot... even retired a few helo' pilots by explaining exactly how their craft got off the ground. (lolz) ;o)
I thought that's what a license was for: Evidence that you know what you're doing.
The only thing I've ever flown was R/C. But I've designed aircraft & read a few hundred NTSB accident reports. One of the most frequent causes of crashes is 'Failure to continue flying the airplane'. It's unfortunate that often pilots get so engrossed in dealing with a POTENTIAL fatal emergency that they fail to save the day simply by flying the aircraft. One of the most obvious examples, IMHO, is the death of about 9 parachutists, the death of the pilot, and the crash of the aircraft. The plane lost power on takeoff. The parachutists jumped without enough altitude to open their chutes. And the pilot spun in trying to turn back to the airstrip.......with a large empty farm field at the end of the runway. (That was the NTSB's observation, not mine.) There are dozens & dozens of these kinds of accidents. Much of it is just a human condition sort of thing.
@@terrencefoley509 The license (ANY license) can ONLY EVER mean you've completed a series of classes, passing standardized tests and a final exam of some kind with a given lower limit (standard set by associated agencies) to your score(s)...
What happens in practice is very much the same as in high school. Going to classes only really forces people to temporarily memorize most of the information given so they can regurgitate it on the tests... THEREAFTER it's quickly and easily forgotten.
This is part of why Commercial Pilots have SO MANY standards to keep up, and so many training and testing sessions throughout their careers... Checkrides are scheduled at least tentatively, throughout their careers... and on top of that, they're required to log a "full cycle" of flying (noting especially take-off AND landing the plane) every 90 days... There are regular repeat sessions in the simulators, and with any write-up or a note on their competency made by a check pilot, quizzing senior, or otherwise aviation official, they'll be faced with a mandatory additional session for "re-training"... It's better than firing, most of the time, but there's a persistent need to keep the skills sharp by making them PERFORM the practices as well as regurgitate answers like on a test, written OR verbal.
In General Aviation (private pilots and hobby flyers) the standards aren't so strict by rote. No company is banking on a given private license holder to keep from embarrassing them, losing faith of the public, or creating a marketing nightmare... SO nobody's breathing fire and brimstone down a private pilot's neck to make him or her DO the practice or ask any further questions, go to sims or even play simulator games at home... AND nobody much bothers to check when the last full cycle was practiced by a given General Aviator... If you're not competent, you're just going to crash when you get in over your head...
AND arguably, at least in the States, the same can be said of a motorcycle license. Passing for the "minimals" to get a license does NOT mean you're safe to have on the road, EVEN with the MSF course. ALL they can really teach is the series of drills and practices that will refine your skills on a motorcycle, BUT after that 2-day course, you're ON YOUR OWN... Those who practice and work a little on their own, build skills and refine their techniques to continue doing better... Many DO go to further classes and courses and even track-days to get better with a motorcycle for the rest of their lives.
AND the same is true of pilots...
BUT just as many DO NOT... They assume that once they've been taught, they just "know" it... AND they carry on forth until the day comes that they simply aren't skilled or practiced enough to deal with the series of problems at hand...
SO a person who went through the classes and regurgitated answers successfully is a glorified trained monkey with a stick in his hands... AND the one who pursues further training, practices and even recruits other pilots to come check his math and chat over his flight plans, even when he plans to take a trip alone, is the one who becomes a great pilot... AND he'll eventually get to more courses while advancing his skills and getting involved in bigger and more sophisticated (and expensive) aircraft. ;o)
First clip: “was he trying to do that?”
Yeah, he was trying to grind the end of his wing off 😂
That Piper Chieftain landing was a big pro!!!!
Many of these aren't crashes, but successful emergency-landings! Also, too many repeats!
... and too may fakes..
Wow I haven't seen this many reruns since I watched TBS.
Это нормально по 2-3 раза вставлять одно и то же видео?
Good but there's a lot of repeats
I flew with a friend of mine and one thing about cross-wind landings is 'you never know"
Thank you for these excellent video clips which really help scratch the flying itch
That thumbnail shows a plane being scrapped apparently, they said it was a KV-10/DC-10 being scrapped when it had TWO ENGINES ON EACH SIDE WHICH MEANS ITS NOT A DC-10
the helicopter that went down in the ocean @ 14:10, had 5 people onboard, and one of the 4 passenger died by drowning. A lack of improper maintenance was the cause of the crash.
Well, "lack of improper maintenance" is actually what you're looking for in this trade
Remember kids, the best landings are the ones you watch....
Where were you flying at that was awesome I really liked your video
Again and again, the same clips! Why?
I couldn't watch very far before I bailed.
watch it again
@@dona6606 Oh no!
In this video you will find: Lots of fake clips, lots of game clips and lots of repeated clips. Dislike.
Watching this compilation of aircraft crashes and close calls is a sobering reminder of the risks involved in aviation. The skill and composure of the pilots during these dangerous landings are truly commendable. It's a testament to their training and professionalism that they're able to manage such intense situations. It's also a crucial reminder of the importance of maintaining rigorous safety standards in the industry to minimize these kinds of events. Stay safe up there!
THANKS A.I.!!
@@mikeh.7499 you're welcome
the only channel u need!
Wilbur Wright did not 'drop out' of high school. He completed the curriculum, but due to his family relocating at about the time of his graduation, he never received his diploma. Orville DID drop out after completing 3 years of high school. This would have been noteworthy these days, but back then is was pretty common, and both brothers would have been considered fairly well educated
Any landing that one can walk away from is a good one.
Definitely lots of serious accidents. Also a lot of manure as in the airliners doing barrel rolls 100 ft off the ground. Why so many three & fourpeats after 26 min?
The guy @6:39 definitely qualifies for the 'Luckiest Man in the World' finals. Also the driver of the bus @9:43.
@14:45, I've flown Latam in 2021. Their safety record is actually very good now. Nice planes also.
Wow some of these are just hard to watch. 😮
6:04 Wtf, i've never seen that, that was a deadly boomerang ^^
The 727 with no nose gear skills keeping it level until the end.
Can someone please explain what is "Aircraft Crashes and Close Calls - Dangerous Plane Landings - EMERGENCY LANDING" about military aircraft landing on unprepared or grass strips just tlike they are designed to do is? Or how about putting voice overs on Flight Sim footage?
15 mins in and no AeroSucre?? Dear god has the world gone mad??
I do most certainly feel very sorry for all of the a/c crashes because of them cost 💲 many dollars or EUROS to repair ❤😢😢
To correct the Incorrect grammar. Because of THEIR cost , etc😢😢😢😮
nice ! good vides
You'll have an endless supply of content coming from the commercial and military sectors in the coming years. You can quote me on that!
5:11 no pun intended, but you could call these literal "helicopter parents" at work here.
I hate seeing those old warbirds crash. There are so few of them left.
Far too many duplicates and basic safe landings...
Good video but needs editing. Keeps showing the same incidents over and over.
these video, where the planes roll over are soooooo fake....
No way man
it happened cause I was standing right there its just not possible that any other plane would do it but it did happen
Honest to trump it really did happen!! Wings were destroyed too
Could we trouble you to check your editing? You seem to use a lot of the same footage albeit with different camera angles, recycled footage across multiple videos, and as others have mentioned, repeat footage.
Gyrocopters seem especially unstable on take-off!
Good video. Too many repeats.
If I see that dude in the white board shorts holding up his hands again I'm gonna puke!
I beg of you, no more cheesy reruns. Please!!
Разве можно после этих видео утверждать,что авиатранспорт самый безопасный в мире???
Norskfreight 747 was a studio prop for the Tenet film!
The biplane at 2 50 was a model.
Why make the upload twice as long by replaying the same footage. I don't think I can be bothered to watch any other upload on this channel.
7:02 and 13:56 Clip is double in the same video
Video would be half the length without the constant repeats
Enjoyable until it repeated itself half way through. Can't subscribe to that.
@30:28 that pilot was flying that aircraft,he wasn't giving up on it.
About the time the wingsuit flyer appears,William Shatner quickly clean side
Some good old BULL SH12
pilot skill Dewa,,...
9:00 min, P51 Big beautiful Doll?'1992 or 2014?
Those magnificent men in their dying machines.
1:10 perfect timed sound
Génial
10:20 was real. It was for a movie, and it was cheaper to do this than build a set.
omg ain't no way that's actually cheaper 💀
@@RedTrex9 I suspect the plane was scrap, and the building was going to be demolished anyway. If that's the case, it would be WAY cheaper than building a full size set and a fake plane. You could do it in miniature for less, but it wouldn't look real.
@@ReadTheShrill ok tysm
Reminds me of the scene in "Airplane!".
The Norskfreight 747 crashing into a terminal building is from the movie Tenet
man, it hurts seeing those veteran warbirds go down
Whats goes up must go down
YEAH SAME GUYS
Hard to believe it was such a awkward title it says 2 million plus views
*REPEATS REPEATS REPEATS* Don't waste your time here.
Trop de doublons voire triple...
INCREIBLE DE QUE ESTAMOS AGUANTANDO DE ESTAS BANDAS ARMADOS QUE NOS BLOQUEN EL CAMINO:
Mi video se llama - Robotizado con CD4017 , NE555 Pilotos
Con esto funciona mucha maquineria solo. Andre❤
Cada louco tem o seu prazer. O meu é tocar teclados e fazer arranjos musicais.
36:16 Obviously sped up, but this is a common prank on the crowd at air shows. Excellent pilot pretending to know nothing
BOA TARDE , HOJE TEM MENOS VENTO QUE ONTEM. UM ABRAÇO DESDE SANTO ANTONIO
No.... seriously....we can drag it out by just repeating clips over and over and over.... nobody will notice... and even if they do, they'll just keep watching....
Those one man helicopters look so dangerous. You gotta be a little suicidal to attempt flying those.
The 747 crashing into the building at 10:17 is from the movie Tenet.
why so many double videos? get your act together and compile it properly!
Same old videos.
Yeah. I stopped watching after the Avenger ditched for a 3rd time. In fairness, this vid would be a good test for dementia.
wonder what happened to the aircraft that tried to land at 30.25 onwards.that was unreal !!!!!
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅