765LT should be called the 865LT * McLaren 765LT Dyno Testing compared to 720S
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- We put the brand new McLaren 765LT on the dyno to see just how much power it's really making.
Gear we USE: goo.gl/4AczKS
hydramotorwork...
More 765LT Videos: • McLaren 765LT
#765LT
#dyno
#mclaren
What a monster! Hit that LIKE/Thumbs UP button!
I hate this car. I hate this car I hate this car... Signed a Ferrari fan boy. Lol
@@technom3598 lol why?
@@Jana-nb6xg the SF90 is about to go down. Thats why
SF90 makes only 10% more power, but weighs 30% more
@@ovadialevy478 wrong
One of the things I really appreciate about Brooks is if he says he will make a video, he makes it. You don't have to wait 6 months and 4 teaser videos for it to happen.
Amen to that.
Indeed 👍🏻
True dat
How did Brooks make his money?
@@johnnytheirishman3387 robbed banks, buried the money
This is just mind bending. In stock, this car is making nearly as many horses as a Porsche 918 Spyder. Cheeky, cheeky McLaren!
Tbf that is a 6 year old car now. Its very old in car years. In that time we have super sedans in the 600Hp mark now doing 0-100kph in 3 secs
and much lighter
Imagine 918 built today using modern standards and materials. ☠
@@usmanrauf4249 that's the sf90
@@justina9914 kinda true though 🤔
McLaren really changed the game, the kind of car that promises a lot, but delivers even more in the real world - with everyone else, it's lots of promises, but in the real world it's not even close. Well done McLaren, THE speed KING
Too bad they're in the shop 60% of the time
@@ElvB not really...
Jake Brown Depreciation says otherwise
@@ElvB most cars depreciate... you wouldn't find a car that doesn't unless its a limited production car like the sabre
Jake Brown I know that McLaren makes some really good cars but the issues they have and the depreciation kinda bad compared to cars like porsche or some ferraris.
The 8 downvotes are the McLaren engineers who are regretting themselves not calling it the 865LT
Nah, they're laughing and high-fiving each other. Sadly, its probably the Ferrari camp that is pissed.
@@AC-bl1rl Its not really an accurate reading, the dyno is suspect. Not saying this thing isn't making way more power than advertised I am just suspicious with the readings they are putting out for 720s then this. Would like to see a couple more tests at other venues.
@@Chris-hw4mq Yeh, I know and believe that. The guy said the 720S had 650hp. Which threw me a bit because I have heard others report varying figures. Not saying I dont believe this but I want to see more tests before I believe.
@@Chris-hw4mq McLaren uses BHP not HP , the only thing the same in England as in the USA is they use miles per hour . They use metric , newton metres of torque instead of pound feet and drive on the wrong side of the road .
They need to build a successor to this, and if it would be 865lt, then they would raise the expectations for the next one a lot...
I work for a living so I can't believe I'm saying this, but that seems like a lot of car for $300,000. Color me impressed
No you're right tbh it really is, even at 375k it has me thinking of shopping for one though it's irresponsible for my income lol
Lol. It’s a fantastic driver’s car. But I think you need to read up a little on the service costs, hassle and frequency of repairs needed for a Mclaren. It makes even Ferrari or Lamborghini look like Honda. So I get what you’re saying but if you buy a mclaren you better be willing to spend a lot more than what you paid for the car
@@mikemoggerson6651 you literally could not be more wrong.
karenable.com/maintenance-costs-the-mclarens/
@@mikemoggerson6651 after seeing brooks drag his 720s with little issues I'm convinced that it's just hit or miss lottery on these things.
@@GR-uc1gq absolutely. It’s luck of the draw. Either you get a lemon, or prized race horse.
These are the perks of watching a rich businessman doing RUclips videos; No clickbait, no dumb intros, cutting straight to the point. The other car youtubers go into debt buying cars they can't afford then try to squeeze every single penny out of each one of their videos.
explains alot
Hennessy got 748whp on pump fuel with their 765LT so it’s in-line with this car. Wicked innit? :)
@@stubones crazy basically 900hp
@@origaminefretami3480 Idk why either, nobody asked for this nonsense
@Touge RS Just trying to say that this isn’t really Rickys channel, and not his content. So I just don’t understand why you choose to spill all this fan chat here.
I don’t really care what he did, and personally don’t think Ricky cares about these comments either.
All I can say is, nobody in the situation was right.
@@origaminefretami3480 shame the customer service is from the dark ages!
It would be nice to see a race between 770S and 885LT lol
Also will you dyno F8 and Huracan??
@@-The-Mon you missed the joke
The F8 Tributo has the same drivetrain as the 488 Pista, that’s probably why he won’t dyno it. He already dynoed the Pista and it made very close to what Ferrari claims it makes, just slightly above by 10bhp.
ruclips.net/video/0eOkE6BTpX4/видео.html This vid has f8 and huracan dyno charts in it
Anyone else really like watching the self adjusting aero? No clue why I enjoy it so much
So glad you got that colour, looks stunning. Lol it's gonna take some beating at the track !
On the track quite possibly, but at the Drag strip Model S Plaid + Hold my beer !!
McLaren senna owners be like “😯🤔😬”
And P1 owners.
Nobody bought a Senna for this lol. A far more interesting comparison would be to see how quick the LT is around somewhere like Laguna Seca.
Darn near 900hp crank
More so new P1 owners 😭 hard
Senna is a super track car so owners of it may not be weeping as much
@@larssonk22 its a dyno run, not on a circuit! So why would you say Senna owners didnt buy it for this! The 765lt is basically the track variant of the 720
@@adrianrodriguez7811 Exactly, so why would the LT's dyno run make a Senna owner sweat? That's the point I'm making
Shout out to all those who laughed when we said this made over 800hp in stock trim. We see you.
@Cycling Performance are you complaining that a car has more horsepower than advertised? Lol. Hope you don't consider yourself a car guy
We also see your 1000+ comments on this channel. It’s mid day on a Tuesday, shouldn’t you be at work?
@@mikemoggerson6651 is someone taking things a little personal on RUclips? Imagine getting salty reading random comments from random people
@@mikemoggerson6651 my boy JT here commenting from the future, it must be Saturday evening for him
@@StrykerV8 get a job oldie
Hi, love the vids!! I work at mclaren and noticed a small safety issue under you mclaren at 1:32 on your video, the Fuel EVAP pipe is not pocking out from the engine floor, you can see the hole at 1:32 at top left corner, us may be able to just pull it out without tacking the floor off.
What's the wheel hp of the p1 compared to this 765lt?
Lol I fucking said it, and I got insulted by everyone. 885 LT, Mclaren always lying. I dare anyone to say Mclaren is using “alien technology”. This thing weighs 1200 kgs and has 880+ hp, that’s hypercar territory, it freaking annihilates the P1.
Its a good lie😌😇
Another Ego manic comment 😂😂😎
Now is cristal clear why Mclaren are fast on drag race......
Si è comprato il Ferrarino nuovo, arriva a fine anno, la batterà ad occhi chiusi
* crystal
Yup they lie about power
@@projectr2451 how they said 765 lol
That’s obviously the truth 😂🤣
@@bigsho5218 the car is rated for 754hp
Meanwhile at McLaren: "865LT huh? Sounds like a good name for our future 965 horsepower car!" lol
I’m in my hospital bed and was literally just drawing a 765lt... such a great car in every way
Wait why are you in a hospital? whatever it is, get well soon!
Get well soon bro
@@abdulwasay5011 thank you
gws man
@@AzaanPD thank you and it’s a lot of things why I’m in the hospital
Mclaren makes cars with more HP than claimed ... that's some clever marketing! It's like fighting in light weight class but you already 200 lbs ...
He’s also using 100 octane but yeah it made a lot
Exactly. It makes their cars seem more impressive than they actually are. Fantastic engineering and fantastic cars, but people need to stop thinking they are doing it with their listed horsepower because it’s a lot more than that.
100 octane in standard fuel it makes 800 hp
@@Foxfire324 How do you know its 100 octane?, the drag video was posted weeks ago, are u implying his 765LT was parked for an extended period just to retain race fuel I guarantee that car has a tank full of pump fuel
@@mikemoggerson6651 I much rather companies underrate their cars' powers and performance than overrate them or post figures that will never be achieved in normal settings.
Brooks, I can’t hit play fast enough when you post a video. Love how you spec your cars. I don’t know how you don’t have 1 mil subscribers yet...
thanks!
@@DragTimes When will the Puerto Rico video be uploaded??
Goodbye King 720.. the new boss is in town..
Older brother is here... haha
Technically its a 720 on steroids 😂😂
WOW! I’m shocked they improved so much on the already bonkers fast 720S. They might not be the most reliable but the performance is undeniable. Big respect to McLaren based on these results. 👍🏻
Gotta love McLaren 😂😂😂
That’s some savagery. They probably do not want to upset P1 or Senna owners so they sneak it in 😅
If we apply the same logic p1 is somewhere near 1000 hp stock
Did you see the novitech 765lt. P1 level sexy. I gotta agree this car is a hands down buy over a senna any day
Hussain Ismail
But it’s not the same logic. The P1 has been on a dyno, there’s a video. It made 817hp to the wheels. That’s only 47hp more to the wheels than the 765LT.
The P1 is just slightly underrated but it’s not anything more than 930hp. It’s not huge. Brooks here just basically said in the video the 765LT could be making around 885hp. So 918 Spyder power with much less weight? Explains why it’s so fast.
@@marceljohnson2215 I did. The guy didn’t know how to react lol and he drives fast cars they build all the time
@@UrbanBDKNY lol yeah. But I like that, makes him seem like the average joe
This car will be a menace for years...
Just like 720s, the 675LT and 650s were
Not really. Tesla Plaid + is already coming out this year and it’ll go under 9 seconds in the quarter mile. I know quarter mile times aren’t everything, but when something a third of the price beats you then I can no longer call you “menacing”
@@michaelmcdonald9847 this is a track car not a drag car
@@michaelmcdonald9847 Fair enough...Tesla has a funny way of keeping promises. Its almost time to have two classes...FI and Electric. This is king of the petrol and must be such a rush.
I'm convinced that McLaren measure wheel horsepower when stating their numbers. They're not "lying" like some people are saying. Their figures are pretty dead on if you go with wheel horsepower.
McLaren know exactly what they are doing and they are.......lying!
McLaren state crank horsepower, they don’t measure wheel. You can tell by the way they lie about performance numbers too. Let’s be honest. McLaren would’ve tested this car in perfect conditions. Yet they advertised the 765LT to do 0-200km/h in 7.2 secs, slower than a 720S that was timed at 7.1 secs?
McLaren know they have to downplay figures because if the real power figures for the 720S were revealed, the 720S would’ve been compared to the likes of the 918 Spyder and LaFerrari, rather than the 911 Turbo S (992) and F8 Tributo.
That’s why with the 765LT, no one is waiting to compare it to the LaFerrari or track version of the F8 Tributo, they’re waiting to compare it to the SF90 Stradale. Because we know McLaren lie. We just saw the car make 110hp more than the 720S on the same dyno. Yet McLaren claim the difference between the two is only 45hp. How can they not be lying?
Telepathic Membrane
Thank you for that source. Still lying though. The 765LT isn’t just 0.1 secs faster. McLaren know this. They would’ve tested the 765LT as they did the 720S, with actual drivers. They would’ve known the difference in performance.
I knew they were lying about their HP
McLaren are like Jedi to all the evil Sith tuners that overstate their powers..
.
BMW MB Audi Porsche all underrate their engines
@@MrOnat89 depends on the vehicle but regardless none underrate their engines this much 😂
They have to say the horsepower it will make with the poorest quality fuel I.e some low grade African fuel it would make xxx bhp/psi.
Technically they ain’t lying, they just told you the whp instead of crank hp😂😂
The 100 octane likely made a difference in giving the awesome numbers. With that said, I have no clue how quickly the McLaren ECU's adapt. Maybe if they did a few more pulls, you'd get even higher numbers.
Unless a car is tuned for higher octane than what it comes from the factory, there is NO power increase in simply adding higher octane fuel. Cause higher octane doesn't mean more power, higher octane means you can add more timing which is where you'll see the power increase. Modern cars can take away timing when they experience knock due to lower quality fuel but it can't add timing when better fuel is added unless it's tuned for it. All he did by adding 100 octane was ensure he got all the power that car is capable of on stock tuning, which he would have got with 93 octane anyway.
Lets be quite clear here: A mclaren 765LT makes 765 horsepower.
However, that is the power it makes on the legally mandated engine power test (ISO1585 in the UK/EU). That test is a stabilised test ie the engine is loaded on an ENGINE DYNO, and the power measured at enough points across the engine speed range to be able to establish the torque curve. Each test point is required by law to have a certain stability, ie for the power to not change ecessively during the logging of that test point, and each individual point would be held for around 2 to 3 minutes. During the test, the boundary conditions (water and oil temps, intercooling performance, fuel pressure and garde, ambient pressure and humidity etc) all have to be precisely controlled to the defined conditions. So as someone who has actually witnessed the power certification for this engine, i can tell you that the 765 makes it's claimed power and no more. These tests are also independantly witness and verified by each countries certification agency to ensure no cheating, or manipulation of the test facility or the data created.
What you see in this video is what happens when you put a car on a set of chassis rollers, and take a "flash reading" ie non stabilised, and have no control over any of the boundary conditions, and apply an arbitrary correction factor and coast down drag.. You get a different number. Now, typically with heavily turbocharged vehicles, which are very dependant on their intercooling performance to maintain turbocharger efficiency (and hence pre turbine back pressure and knock margins), when you take a flash reading, yes, you will indeed record a power figure that is somewhat higher than the stabilised OE homologation figure, because the engine is relatively cold. This is why we have the industry standard power certifaction tests that are legally mandated, precisely because they allow carefully controlled conditions and hence allow the comparison of cars all tested over those same tests.
This is also why "tuner" power is, ime about 25% smaller than OE power, because the tuners don't tend to have access to the proper certification facilities (and because there industry revolves around being able to claim the biggest number, no matter how truthful that number is, so they would rather quote the flash reading.
A very measured and knowledgable response 👍 @DragTimes Brooks, listen to this guy.
Well said.👏👏
Yep this is correct.
mclaren lies about top speed accleration power to not make p1,senna owners unhappy because a car half (kinda) their price have better performance than the 1mil+ they paid for their mclaren
They're paying for rarity pretty much
Take a Senna round the track and a 765lt round, and you'll see where the extra cash goes. Still, splendid car though.
@@TheNath272000 so the track times constitute 650k more?
Well P1 is kinda old already
@@OneSvT well, I suppose it's just a bragging rights thing for those with so much cash that 600k doesn't raise an eyebrow. Great cars though, looking forward to seeing how it goes against the SF90
Possibly the coolest channel ever! Thanks for sharing your 765 with us Brooks! It’s like 55 here in Montana today too 😂
You gotta get a Novitec kit on this! Make it the beast it truly is!
I literally just watched their video. That car is outrageous!
At 2:02 he cut it off where he was going to say “It’s expensive. But I’m rich af so why do it matter” Lmao
Aliens are trying to steal McLaren engine and drivetrain tech. Other electronics, not so much.
At this point Mclaren might as well come out and tell us about the aliens they abducted to work for them
no wonder it is keeping up, or beating hyper cars. almost 900HP and super light. awesome!
Thats why its beating everything else! Lighter and much more power (and good powerband). Even more than a mapped turbo S
Now these results bring Novitec into question. Have they even tuned the car or just revealed its true power? 🤔🤔🤔
That's exactly what I was thinking... maybe their tune with exhaust and a flash actually decreased power lololol
@@kirubino Most likely it's dyno calibration issues.
Its different than you think, even Novitec underestimate their power but less aggressive than Mclaren, the reason is they want the car to guarantee (at least) that power for lengthy period, so the tune is legit and if done on Dyno you will see easily over 900hp
@@kirubino brooks put 100 octane racing fuel on this dyno session. He should put normal 93 octane pump gas and see how much the difference. turbo engine benefit a lot from running high octane racing fuel.
@@ardijanuar2036 just FYI, we have 98 octane at every Shell station in UK. It's the only fuel I use.
Guess it's a good thing you got it in Green because that thing is a MONSTER!
brooks will you release race vs P1 at 00:21
In original 3.8L form when this engine was used by Nissan in their LeMans program with r390 GT1, without restrictors it was pushing 1000hp at the crank. Just epic engine that was built in the 1990s. BTW, there are not DFI, so technically should be longer lasting than most modern DFI engines.
It's crazy this thing is legal. Lol One of the rare companies that don't hype up HP numbers. They actually say it has less!! Lol. Love McLaren!
Well you love being lied to. How stupid
Stfu
@@justjuice1264 It's a lie that means good news, not bad. You're probably a millennial who wouldn't know this, but auto manufacturers used to do this routinely in the late 1960's/early 70's.The late 80's Ford Mustang 5.0's were quite underrated as well. I sense a snowflake!!
Most high end European car brands do that - just to make the silly American brands not feel too bad
@@justjuice1264 🖕
My 1980 Mercedes-Benz 240D has 67 HP, love it 👍
It's fun to drive though right? All that matters
I am guessing it has 765 hp to the wheels.
Edit: McLaren should have just called it the 795lt or 800lt
In metric hp it has 765 to the wheels
These are BS drum dynos! The only way to test these is on a maha dyno which manufactures and race teams use! The old 720 read 715-735 on a maha dyno at the crank! Brooks knows this as he’s on the maclife forum. Disappointing that he shouts out these figures as it’s a discredit to the engineering in the McLaren! It’s light, great gearbox and ratios and has a great power curve.
The only use for these drum dynos is back to back runs or comparing to another car.
@@GazRsExtremeBrickMachines thats what the point was. Comparing to a 720 so.....
@@mattr6344 yes so why not put on the video title, 765 put down 80more hp than a 720.... there’s no way on this planet this car has 880hp and he’s putting that figure out there and not the difference!
@@GazRsExtremeBrickMachines Agree with Technic man! Due to this video the morons will just claim it’s fast cos it has 900hp!..... laughable dyno numbers!
Hennessey also put the 765LT on the dyno. 750 whp on 93 octane and 780 whp on race fuel 109 oct.
This thing pulls like a freight train. This is a whole new level compared to the pista, and almost makes the Ford gt look like a family sedan
i’m amazed when people say a car is on a new level because they underrate the power. Great car but we have 2jz’s and 4 bangers that would smoke this. I dnt get it. If Ferrari wanted to underrate a car and chase power figures they can.
@@bigjdm5460 well why aren't they doing it then if it is so easy. 900 hp stock from a 4.0l v8 is pretty impressive in my opinion
That 765 is sick!!! Definitely my favorite car out right now!
10 dislikes must be other supercars owners MCLAREN 💪
Precision of these Dyno testings +-100hp!
There are variables, but even despite this being a Dyno Jet and STD correction, that number is a very valid proof of a severely underrated car.
So cool. That car is an absolute monster. I don’t even think we need to see the 720 race it. You might as well just go ahead and sell the 720 and get the SF90. The SF90 is the only thing in the same league as the 765LT until the Plaid+ Model S comes out.
Funny americans. all you think about is straight line drag race, 1/4 or traffic light grand prix. These McLarens are not even designed for drag race like one trick pony Tesla. Plaid or Plod whatever won't last long at Nürburgring.
@@borinvlogs there is a time and a place for both. Some people like drag racing. Some people like track racing. Some people like both. However, this channel is specifically about drag racing so that is what we are talking about at the moment.
This car is so amazing! Love the rear view when it was entering the dyno.
Gee im not surprised at all Mclaren is known for this for some weird reason.The 720s dynoed at just about 700whp so this makes sense plus factor in how fast these things accelerate and its 1/4mile times. It just dont make sense how these cars kill the competition with "710hp" and "754hp". Its bs lol. But good numbers
yeah it's cheating...i just don't get why they lie , these cars are absolutely fast no doubt about it...but every video, every race it's "whoa, what fast car for 720hp!" or when races against another car with the same hp and smash it it's the same story..
It’s because the weight Mclaren say it is is actually correct. When brook put his Ferrari on the scales it weighed loads more so power to weight ratio is every.
@@dariox3084 good example is the 720s vs the Pista. They have exactly the same horsepower and torque and similar size engines with twin turbos and even though the Ferrari is about 100lbs heavier, the McLaren for some reason is nearly half a second quicker in the 1/4mile on their best days. And its because the 720 really has about 780hp
@@aaronhotchkins2854 dont change the fact that the horsepower is still way underrated though
@@dariox3084 probably to not frustrate the p1,senna owners.😏
Wow that is INSANE!! With this power I think it will even beat the SF90 on the quarter and nothing else will come close!
This thing is going to beat some hybrid awd hypercars isn't it..
😏
I see what you did there ... with the right driver yes. I am more curious on the 1/2 mile.
Most likely not in 0-60 or quarter mile, but past that, yes. Hybrid cars are usually heavy because of the electric motors.
AWD cars will beat it off the line, due to traction. Then 765LT will go past, but probably over 100mph by then.
That engine sounds so smooth!
I would LITERALLY have my left nut surgically removed to own this car. I could care less, this car is totally worth it.
What's stopping?
Good luck to all contenders out there.
Their next car is gonna be a 820s that makes 950hp lmao
Its probably gonna be a hybrid and it may do well over that😂
The McLaren Sabre with 824 hp already exists, but there were few built.
No the mclaren. No you
Thanks for always giving the viewers exactly what we all wanted
Porsche fanboys still think turbo s is king😂
Have fun in the shop fixing this car every week that it breaks and also have fun driving it daily.
yep, Turbo S is much better car than Mclaren GT... 765LT is a limited track ready MR supercar.
Hi Porsche fanboy. My 720s has never had a problem. Just ask Brooke
Ed Tran Depreciation says otherwise
LOL, a 380k Turbo S Will do 7s on 1/4 mile
You have completely sold me on buying a 765 and yes im going to modify & tune it up maybe an extra 100-150 hp
The 765 is definitely the king
Amazing.. Welldone mclaren n team!
Pls do sf90 vs 765 lt
The 865lt will smoke the sf90 on the 1/4
@@mazespinwastaken. you think,you waching to more cartoons,haha
@@mazespinwastaken. ruclips.net/video/hWtZzUbL7UI/видео.html&ab_channel=CarSuperSuperfast
this channel is some cheese the man definitely threw a quick tune on it and got all of you
And imagine that: cars make more power on the street than they do on the dyno due to airflow, high pressure air zones and cooling efficiency :O
I impressed 769hp to wheels that crazy
I think the 100 octane helped alot to reach this number
What about sf90 1/4 mile ? When u wanna upload the video i cant wait to see the numbers and compare both cars
I'll do a follow up video, 60-130 before/after testing with 100 octane...
It`s a freakin` space ship!
Congratulations on the crazy Dyno run for your 765LT. Time to get some running and mods done like full straight pipe decatted full exhaust system and other things. It would be also nice to see some different dyno numbers from other dyno manufacturers to compare the differences. Maybe consider the full Novitec system also. Enjoy the insane crazy ride you buddy!!!!!
nobody :
horsepower : *STONKS*
Hi are u going to get a remap done...
With decat exhaust and remap should run 875bhp 1/4 sub 9
0-60 2.0
RACE VS f8 tributo , SVJ AND 720S !!! please speed add video
Nicely done Mclaren!! That power band is super smooth too 👍👍
Then there's a modest tune coming?lol.
Look up "Novitec 765LT". Turn up the volume.... a lot :D
@@stubones I think they only changed the exhaust at Novitec.
@@PedroTRamos1 that's all you need on a mclaren. Full exhaust including downpipes + tune this thing will be 950hp
@@PedroTRamos1 ecu remap ?
Drivetrain loss I am guessing is closer to 8%-10%. Mid engine are crazy efficient and paired with a DCT, it is very good.
This car is almost as powerful as street speeds ZR1 bone stock.
😂
Streetspeed ordered a 765lt right?
You are such a troll lolol nice joke though
McLaren Always outdoes themselves, can't want to be a proud owner of one of these beasts, thanks for the entertainment Brooks.
So McLaren cheated us again! They are selling an almost 900hp nearly-hypercar for the price of a supercar! How long are we gonna tolerate this?
Lol
@@sleazymiguel6882 and your user name made this even better 😂😂😂😂
@@theanimelibarian7881 You love it huh?🙄
When the Germans do it, it's tolerated and called being "conservative" or "underrated", with a wink and a nudge. Funny how that works. Why the double standard?
@@drifter1234100 man you missed the joke
This is an absolute beast!!!! Awesome work as usual Brooks.
This is why the sf90 is slower.
We must check out this
weight
I've been waiting for this video. 885bhp! I knew this car made more than advertised but I'd never have guess so much more. That's very nearly 900 PS on a stock 4-litre bi-turbo ICE. Well done McLaren.
Came here after seeing Hennessey video
Go check out the Novitec video. The exhaust they put on it is insane.
Great video! In the UK Dynojet is very disbelieved! Rule of thumb in the UK is that a Dynojet WHP is what it SHOULD be calculated crank! No one in the UK believes Dynojet numbers especially Dynojet without Eddy brakes to actually load the car up correctly for a test sweeps
There’s no way the drivetrain is sucking 120 hp
it can very easily. most cars lose about 10-15% from drive train loss and as the hp number goes up so does the drive train loss.
@@fatalgaming6068 its not a perfectly linear relationship. The more power the car has the more inertia comes into play with wheels, tires, gears, etc. because the rotational acceleration of those components will be a higher value but the loss due to friction and fluid viscosity stays relatively the same assuming similar dyno speeds are used
We know McLaren is not telling the truth with their numbers....720S clearly remains unexplained. 660whp but around 780bhp at the crank. The 765LT was correct with its whp, but at the crank it goes up to 880bhp. Anyway their cars really perform as advertised.
tbh it sucks that they lie about this stuff because it makes them seem "better" than rival cars that have the same claimed hp when all they're doing is adding hp
I hear your point, but if it was your money in that 765LT wouldn't you be happy to get more than you paid for? Most manufacturers understate their figures now, so it's not likie Mclaren is cheating. You take a F90 M5 for eg with a claimed 591bhp. Most make anywhere from 630hp to 650hp stock. The AMG 63S makes around the same even though it's claimed figure is 604bhp.
@@stubones Shhhhhhh don't talk to idiot into thinking smart
@@stubones a little more power is fine but over a hundred is a bit too much. The main issue is that it makes other rival cars look bad. If I bought a ferrari 488 pista I'd be pretty disappointed seeing a heavier 720s with the "same" hp gapping me. The second issue is reliability cuz generally higher hp cars are less reliable. And yea I know that they understate less consistent numbers like quarter miles and 0-60 so idk lol I guess I like knowing exactly what I'm paying for
Interested to know what it makes on purely 93 oct instead of pumping some 100 in there to pump up the octane
Good point. I actually forgot about the gas by the end of the vid
McLaren: More horsepower than claimed
Ferrari: faster acceleration times than claimed
It’ll be a nice fight
i thought ferrari slower acceleration than they claimed.
U forgot
Ferrari: Heavier weight than claimed.
Also no i've never seen a Ferrari accelerate faster than claimed,I actually saw it with McLaren,765lt was claimed to do 124 mph 7.2 and it ran 7 flat,it also claimed a faster 1/4 mile time.
@@Jana-nb6xg said the McLaren guy
@@vamps15me don’t matter what u’re thinking, there are videos on RUclips that demonstrate this. Even this channel
@@HeresTheGenZFlorentineFolks. this channel proves what am saying,and alot of other channels ofc.
Been waiting for this one , i knew it would come. Gotta love Mclaren for these numbers damn
I’ll give you an SAT analogy:
765 : Senna :: Buick Grand National : Corvette
Those who understand that, understand it.
Yup, I understand it
Loosely similar
5:15 It's nice to finally see how I might fit into a 720/765LT. It looks workable.
Lol am i the only one who knew this car had over 765hp?
Obviously not, considering his 720S made more than that LOL
What a beast of a car goals congrats @DragTimes
Whats good everyone? How the homies holding up? 😁
@Jamillion Lorissaint Rip I hope your coping
@Jamillion Lorissaint you'll get through it man, just take it day by day 👍
@Jamillion Lorissaint Good to hear. Keep doing things and I hope it will all be good soon.:)
insane video, thanks !
I think Mclaren have been lying about their power figures for a little while now. No wonder their cars decimate pretty much everything.
Aerodynamics is such an interesting thing. The Ford gt sacrificed so much for aerodynamics, but it's probably not as effecient as this. This looks so smooth, it looks like it slides through the air like a hot knife in butter
no views and no likes but some how 5 commets? what the hells going on
1st day?
@@technom3598 no second
About the 720s was the weather cold like you tested the 765LT
Where are all the Turbo S fanboys now lo
Still here. Very different cars. Can't not be impressed with this 765LT but it seems to me it's actually too fast to put into the hands of your average rich kid, lol Hats off to McLaren, hopefully it will be reliable which has been an issue with others. If I was a Senna owner I'd be pissed though, lol
Mclaren has made your channel so epic excellent choices in all your cars🙏