I've checked all your videos. Your channel is a goldmine, thank you for sharing your knowledge on the matter and synthesizing it into practical videos.
Wow, I had no idea. Biological engineering is astonishing. Do we know what the update rates are like? Is it more like a Fourier transform, or like wavelets (with a varying temporal footprint)?
Your explanations are great but I still want to point something out. Objects in space (such as air) can only occupy one place in space at a time. So there is no superimposition of waves in the real world (at least at macroscopic scale).. It is true that we do hear harmonics but that is only because of the way our ears do natural Fourier transformation on the waves they receive, as you explained. However, harmonics are not real in a physical sense (unless you have a multitude of little speakers producing sine waves which result in one and the same block of air moving in a square wave fashion). I might be wrong, but whenever someone explains this it seems they forget that an object's movement cannot be described by more than one wave at a time. You mentioned speakers in an earlier response. From what I could gather, different parts of a speaker move differently, but there is no superimposition of waves in one and the same part of the speaker.
Amazing presentation.❤❤
These videos are second to none. Really appreciate this work you are doing.
I discovered your channel today and I'm watching all the videos several times. Thank you very much for so much important information.
very clearly and detailed. It's awesome.
Just... Bravo! Thank you very much
I've checked all your videos. Your channel is a goldmine, thank you for sharing your knowledge on the matter and synthesizing it into practical videos.
seriously. i genuinely could not possibly say enough good things about the work he has done here
11 minutes to explain what might take up to a year in class!
very good
That was very interesting thanks
Wow, I had no idea. Biological engineering is astonishing.
Do we know what the update rates are like? Is it more like a Fourier transform, or like wavelets (with a varying temporal footprint)?
Good question! I didn't get that deep into it)) my intuition suggests Fourier transform, but I don't know for sure
Your explanations are great but I still want to point something out. Objects in space (such as air) can only occupy one place in space at a time. So there is no superimposition of waves in the real world (at least at macroscopic scale).. It is true that we do hear harmonics but that is only because of the way our ears do natural Fourier transformation on the waves they receive, as you explained. However, harmonics are not real in a physical sense (unless you have a multitude of little speakers producing sine waves which result in one and the same block of air moving in a square wave fashion). I might be wrong, but whenever someone explains this it seems they forget that an object's movement cannot be described by more than one wave at a time.
You mentioned speakers in an earlier response. From what I could gather, different parts of a speaker move differently, but there is no superimposition of waves in one and the same part of the speaker.