Posting your art online in 2024...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 янв 2023
- I've seen a few people saying this in the comments and that's fine since a lot of them are not serious but don't go around saying this to other artists, even as a joke. It's pretty rude.
also don't look at the layers...
Join membership: / @ronillust
Join discord server: / discord
I make digital art, mostly digital paintings. Follow me here:
Instagram: / ronillust
Twitter: / ronillust 
Развлечения
"You art looks like AI."
"Your comment looks AI."
"NPC comment"
The Internet is dead and AI has killed it.
"God is dead and we have killed him."
LOL
🤣🤣
When they say "it looks like an AI art", it feels like, someone calls you a hacker in video games
It sounds cool until they bonded themselves together to kick you out of the lobby
Nah, when someone has called you a hacker when you were not hacking it's a compliment.
But this is like you have baked a cake for your friends and after tasting they ask: "Where did you buy this from?"
It's worse than that. When someone calls you a hacker in a game there's rarely anything bad about it. But that certain art style looks like AI made it's more serious problem for many reasons.
Happen a lot in tf2
@@arttusiirila6790 That's also a compliment lol, saying you made it makes it even more impressive
Wow the document "why I made the art I made: the dissertation" was so descriptive and inspiring, I almost cried while reading it especially the second paragraph, that one was beautiful.
Ikr I’m crying
He deserves a price for that
Bro rickrolled us
“The Pig War was a confrontation in 1859 between the United States and the United”
-last paragraph, unfortunately cut off.
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
“You should change your artstyle”
“You should change who you’re talking to”
"It looks like AI art."
Then stop feeding my art to the AI.
shutup omg artists are so whiny and entitled smh my head my head
Best comment ever
As if AI art didnt come from humans smh
"This looks like AI art."
"But the hair isn't rotated >10* off and the sleeves don't look like compressed springs?"
But yeah, AI art can generate wonderful concepts w/ similar art styles to even the greats, but even at the best of times they need some serious touch-ups.
@@PyramidsofGiza369 as if ai art didnt come from art smh
Being called an AI artist when you are not that, is like spending a whole night doing your homework essay and the next day at school someone accusses you for copying your classmate homework even though he copy pasted every paragraph from wikipedia
Which is a good times to mention that there's ai programs for writting essays too.
Thats the most accurate ai analogy iv heard yet
Its like someone blaming you for using ChatGPT when you wrote everything yourself
AI artists are better than regular artists. That's why they're so popular.
@@SyndicateOperative lol no
Imagine training for a long time as a track and field athlete and then people told you to change your running form because it is similar to the running form of a robot that was programmed to copy the running form of countless of people like you.
This is a good analogy
Be careful, people would comment you "BuT AI DoEsnT CoPY ArT wORkS"
@@deftonesFTW people say that? İt literally does
Especially with artists looking like other artists
@@owyemen9367 the mental gymnastics these AI bros pull to justify their ignorance and stupidity is insane xD
the most ironic thing is that when an actual AI art is posted, the comments were like 'omg so beautiful this is iNcReDiBLe' ; but when someone posted their drawing (usually are people who dont draw) will attack them or ask which AI app they used.
The worst thing? AI art used to be much more easier to spot, nowadays its getting harder and im actually afraid of it. I start seeing AI art with 5 functional fingers and hair strands that dont merge together.
Extra pro tips to spot ai art:
-Look at the bg for a line that should be straight behind the character, make sure it allignes with itself, ai always gets it wrong.
-ai tends to draw eyebrows over the bangs, make sure the parts on the bangs are consistent with the one on the skin.
-pupiles. If an artist draws both pupiles differently it's noticeable bcs it's on purpose, but in ai they're wobbly for no reason.
-Patterns, especially when they're suposed to be symmetrical, make no sense.
😉
@@YumeBateyebrows over hair is a standard anime style.
@@YumeBat or way easier look at the lighting its always weirdly to perfectly plastic like, its always very unnaturally colored
Cut to 10 years later to a RUclips short "This guy can make AI art without using a computer"
Physical pain reading
@@joelrobinson5457 True lovecraftian horror
AI Art existed before Moses *NOT CLICKBAIT* THEY DID IT IN ROCK
@@pcenero Lifehack: how to make a 100% accurate AI image of your surrounding with just your phone.
"Takes a photo"
So sad
It doesn't look like AI artstyle, she has normal fingers.
More seriously, your art is beautiful. Please keep at it.
please keep at it.. so i can build a model using them lol
And the eyes don't look wonky. And the hair doesn't seem to connect into the background, skin or clothes. Hell, even AI generated photos of actual people look weird once you observe them closely. :/
and a normal number of them
The lighting also looks normal and it doesnt look too bright , idk ive seen alot of ai art with that kind of lighting
Just wait til AIs can get hands right
Then we’re all doomed
I'm a writer myself, though I do try and create art from time to time.
A friend just showed me an AI written story from a prompt it was given, and had I not known it was AI that wrote it, I wouldn't have been able to tell.
Artists are not the only ones under threat, AI is quickly becoming the leading killer of creativity.
Having said that, your artwork is gorgeous, and it doesn't look like it was made by AI because AI pieces lack a creative light, and your work is shining. 😊
As an artist and a writer as well.. I can relate. And it's a devastateting feeling..
AI isn't a killer of creativity, in fact it is just the opposite, but I agree with you that it is unfair for people to judge art just because it "looks like AI".
AI written stories *suck*. They're nonsensical still; they're still stuck in the 1990s level of AI.
>AI is quickly becoming the leading killer of creativity
>AI pieces lack a creative light
Pick one
As a student, artist and passionate fanfic writer, I agree. The commercial, public use of AI is causing people to lose intelligence and become lazy. And it undermines those who have worked hard to get where they are now.
Personal example and experience: I have been too tired to take an L before for not doing homework or passing out while writing an essay, so I have used AI to help write or create a structure in my text. And I have actively lost creative ability and intelligence. I've gone from being VWO level to HAVO, maybe even MAVO level (These are Dutch high/secondary school education levels, VWO/Atheneum and Gymnasium being the highest)
"A.I artstyle" is a style stolen from artists. The A.I didn't draw anything, it compiled pictures to create what you told it to
Woah, almost like AI art was based on other peoples artwork and didn't just magically pop out of thin air. Amazing. What a novel concept.
AI: *steals art*
People: AWESOME TECHNOLOGY SUCH AN ORIGINAL MASTERPIECE!!!!
Human: *creates an absolute masterpiece that simply defies the laws of reality due to how perfect it is*
People: Wow you probably stole an ai art smh smh artists are the most useless people ever
@@bendy514we live in a society
@@bendy514 Hey woah woah woah it doesn't steal art, it just makes art using what it's learned about art it was trained on.
@@bendy514 It doesn't steal art. Shut the hell up until you bother to learn about the subject.
@@thisdude9363 I do know about the subject but looks like you don't
If you take some else's art without their permission and use it, that's stealing
"Your artstyle looks AI"
*Has no distortions in the body and lineart, espescially the hands*
It just shows how little people who are not associated with drawing/painting know about art. It's also funny how they're amazed when an actual artist can tell them in an instant in 99 out of 100 examples if a drawing was done by AI or not. They seem to be genuinely mad that some people know this stuff and they can't figure out how people know - but even if there are no hands on the drawing, there are usually some details that give it away, but untrained eye won't see anything suspicious.
Which leads to a point that AI won't turn people into artists. In fact, an artist who can use AI will get much better results than a non-artist.
As someone who uses AI art, I have to spend 10-15 hours per image fixing all the distortions. And there's always something left. It's actually kinda insane.
And yeah, it's like, you can spot bad AI art a mile away.
But at the same time, if you see AI art without distortions, you know some one has been polishing it for a long time. Or they're skilled enough to match the art style.
@@uniquename6925 ai could never be perfected, ai imagery still has the same distortions and errors that it has had for nearly 8 years. Unless someone has a supercomputer and generates the highest quality, most dynamic and creative ai artwork.
I used an ai program one time in hopes that it would help with oc inspiration....eyes wonky, arm morphed into the waist and overall high dislike is brown skin-
Actually ai art is super sophisticated now and is making fewer of these distortions because people are just training them like crazy on all art photography and pronography
Love what you did with the hairstyle, seeing your art usually gets me pumped up to try to improve my drawing ability
You can recognize it's human made art from three aspects:
Scenario, hands and clothing patterns. AI has a difficult time doing normal hands, scenarios usually boil down to low res natural environments, white blurs, or nonsensical architecture. And clothe patterns usually try to resemble the real thing, but AI only knows they're squiggly lines, so it usually does nonsensical squiggly lines.
The biggest problem AI has created is exactly this, not being able to trust people's skills because it looks like what AI programs copy.
Any AI artist will most likely mention that they are using AI, unless they're scumbags but I've seen only a few of those so far.
@@DevillForceBecause most of them are proud of it,they don't even see an issue with anything there.
@@ArtisanAsteroid it gives ai a bad name that's for sure
@@DevillForce I’ve seen a LOT of DeviantART accounts and the like that post AI art without even mentioning it in tags or description.
@@DevillForce people who use ai to post art aren't "artists" they literally type a few words and a machine (who used several images and real artist's stolen work) makes it for them
God: Don’t eat that apple
Ronillust: Don’t look at the second paragraph
Humans: I NEED THIS FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE
You could say...
We're at a loss.
we're no strangers to love
nah it's leads you to the description
@@timesnewrman which leads you back to video, which leads you to-
*GAME OVER*
@@ergohash2517 you know the rules and so do i
Look at the second paragraph in the document, I never knew how much I needed those helpful words.
"It looks like AI Art!"
That one artist called AI:
Ron always finds the most clever and sneaky ways to Rick Roll us.
@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 🏳️🌈?
@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 sorry my brian is in "half on" XDXDXDDDDD
@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 but in any case: 🏳️🌈?
U saved me thanks😊
@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 I was about to see what it is but you and this guy’s comment saved me ❤
"Why I made the art that I made: a dissertation" is now one of my favorite pastime reads.
Damn, I should've known...
The worse part is that this video isn't the first one I see where artists get asked to "change style because AI has that artstyle too"😵💫
*yeah i wonder why*
@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 drawing in different art styles takes effort and practice, each new style requires lots of trials and errors to archieve. Of course if you can do more than one style is a plus for your skills and improvement, but you're saying that a human skill that took lots of years to reach the point where it is now should change instead of a folder of pictures someone took from google?
Whatever style the artist will try, someone will take it and put it in that folder for the AI as quickly as a google search.
There's no escape, no "maybe they should change style", if they change, the AI will be fed the new one and it'll take that one too, repeat the cycle.
They should just make a law where AI generated pictures have a not removable watermark to identify them, it's not that hard
I do not know how much sick eyes are needed not to notice that the AI cannot draw small details, and this not only concerns the fingers, but also the background, jewelry, belts and patterns on armor or clothing. Landscapes generally turn out to be absolutely random. I'm not an artist, but why is it noticeable for me, but not for Twitter dumps?
My art isn't even good enough yet to be called out for being AI generated
All art is better than the “art” AI creates
@@adamjoestar2001 yea keep dreaming
@@mandyko I think what they’re trying to convey is that they view art as inherently bound to its creator, a sentiment that is valid and that many people in the past reciprocate. Therefore, AI generated art is hardly really art, and doesn’t really have the same weight as human works. Idk where I stand with all this bc I don’t see AI art that often (don’t use twitter, tumblr, etc.) but I lean more in their direction. That being said it does say a lot when “cute anime girl” can be boiled down to a bunch of bits and pieces by a computer program and be just as if not more popular than the stuff people were making before, but that’s just me thinking the genre’s degenerate anyway.
@@mandyko a picture that looks good is not better art...
a dog crying with autotune, sounds more accurate with the scales with perfect tune...
but is not better artist than freddy mercury
@@mandyko Ai art is worse it steals art from artists who take hours to draw real art Ai art is just art that is stolen how would it be better than any kind of real art
Ok but that art is literally godlike
You mean "godlike" as in "like it was made with ChatGOD", the latest AI?
@@lonestarr1490 what
@@lonestarr1490 god damn it
@@averageduckenjoyerthefinal shut up
@@lilymatthosinhos2086 you mean like the ai? /S
Yo you did a nice explanation on the second paragraph of your document man
good job!
This is why I've been terrified of AI art. I don't want my hard work (and frankly, my heart and soul in artistic form) to be compared to something I can never compete with and have people tell me it's not real. It honestly makes me so sad.
happened to me yesterday, though it was in person because getting any kind of online attention as a SFW artist in 2020 + 3 is a pipedream.
they said it looked like AI art, though they didn't doubt i made it myself. but its still demoralising that anything of high enough quality is immediately suspect of being AI.
"Getting any kind of online attention as a SFW artist in 2020"
✊😔
technically, being called out as if you used AI art is the equivalent of being so good in a video game that someone calls you a hacker
anytime someone tells you that your art looks like AI, take it as a compliment that people are that shocked of your skill lol
@@exursix fair enough, but being called a hacker can be demoralizing as well
The ai is trained to imitate good art
Your art doesn't look like AI art. AI art looks a bit like yours. Cause you're a good artist
@@Eldoofus It can, but being so good that you are accused of hacking brings me some form of pride....
Too bad I'm a sniper main lmao
Happened to me when I uploaded an illustration onto a FB group. It was an older drawing that I did on a computer I don't own anymore. It was a miracle that I managed to find screenshots of the WIP that I sent to my friends. They still removed it though...because it was a portrait and it "didn't match my other work" that was very obviously my own style. These witch hunts need to stop.
So true man I'm sick of people's bullshit
It's basically a moral panic at this point.
@@uniquename6925 totally
@@mrwerewolf7855 Yeah a lot of these people think they're the arbiters of art, when in reality they just run a shite Facebook page.
@@uniquename6925 or a power trip
The first thing that comes into mind with all this it's the SpongeBob disappointed sound
It's sad that most people don't know shut about art
That's why they prefer the AI thing
I refuse to call art what the AI does
His art doesn't look like AI, AI looks like his art.
its honestly still pretty easy to tell the difference between actual artists and ai art. I fear the day that I start struggling to tell the difference.
I fear that too - imagining that AI art degrades to that point... thankfully they only sampled the best artists on pixiv, not random deviantart amateurs.
I mean we have already reached this point tho. Many people on the internet are still using outdated files for Stable Diffusion. If you open hugging face and look at the finetuned custom weights that are coming out lately, you would be stunned by the precision and lack of artifacts that they produce. They are developed on a big variaty of artstyles and you cannot tell it is something produced by AI. When I tested them I was constantly google image searching them to find source, because I did not believe it was not scraped off the web, but synthesised.
@@idedary Well.... shit
No shot, it totally depends on the artstyle and type of art.
Like almost all sligthly abstract landscape art is fucking untellable, even epople with art-degrees can get confused by them.
Right now with anime art its nearly impossible to tell
I read the second paragraph of the document...
You should do it too. The message is very informative.
God damn it lol
I lost the game….
@@therealyojames I spedrun it.
I wish I saw the comment 5 seconds before....
How dare you /lh 😂
This Art looks amazing, like either an enemy or a dubious Team member or NPC from an Rpg or something along the lines.
It's just stinking genshin impact. How come hardly anyone can tell without lurking?
First people ignore your art or complain about it when you are not a pro and average and now they even complain and claim false things about your art when you are a pro?!
Damn people are never happy and see just the negative in everything...
It's easy to tell your art isn't AI.
AI turns hands into eldritch horrors
yet
AI treats hands like dreams treat hands.
human: "AI can't even draw hands!"
AI: "can you?"
At the slight corners of every A.I anime art, there will always be a typical error that A.I can't notice or register that mistake
It also doesn't understand a lot things. If the eyes are too small they basically become smudges. If it tries to add details it attempts to blend it into what's next to it. Like Hair becoming the outlines of eyes or merging into clothes.
I've never felt this grateful to be a traditional artist until now
xdnt
until they hit you with the "which printer
How did this make you grateful???
Sammee. I’ve always sucked at digital and I find the pen/pencil streaks on paper a lot easier to control and manipulate than a simple tool on a program, and it’s much easier to do textures and stuff. So when the AI art panic started happening I wasn’t really involved in this. Although online traditional art is extremely overshadowed by digital art
Luckily, for pixel artists like yours truly, it's kinda hard for an AI to rip off my style. I mean.... for another like few months probably...
The implication that these people think that AIs have a personal Artstyle makes me wanna retire in a Tibetan Temple and never have contact with the outside world ever again.
Your art is absolutely brilliant! Don’t let the fools dissuade you!!
The Achilles heel/irony of AI art is that because its been trained on so many images, and a lot of artists struggle with drawing hands, the AI itself also struggles with drawing hands
A common struggle of the human anatomy...
But I'm not impressed...
I know the potential of AI Tech in its prime. Maybe this iteration of humanity can achieve it.
Or lose it...
I don't care either way...
Since everything won't exist in my true time...
We may struggle with hands...but not to THAT degree. AI doesn't even try
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 bruh why are you everywhere now
@@__En__
Because I am???
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 I've maybe three of your comments on completely different videos just today
Maybe we share some common interests or something idk
the saddest thing is that it sometimes people don't believe you because some stole your drawing and used one of those programs on it and got more views
“I draw digitally” “oh you mean like anime?”
😭😭
just wanted to say that your art looks very nice and unique uwu, keep it up!
@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 I have to ask, what's the purpose of your comment? Being an annoying prick under a comment that is over a year old?
And aside from that, I genuinely think that the artwork has a unique style. People are just idiots when it comes to differenciating between real and ai art.
I was so worried about this happening. I was less worried with ai art dominating the scene and replace us artists, and more concerned we'd be accused of using ai for our art.
@@LycanKai14 oh man, that's a good example, and by good i mean sad
This is very sad. Especially since some reddits are banning art styles that look like it was made by AI.
Art is very fluid - it can change into what we're learning or drawing in the current moment. Don't mind the messages that say, "Was this made by AI?"
AI can't really mimic the genuine human touch when it comes to digital or traditional pieces, and I hope it never gets to that point.
I really love the artwork, by the way! 💜 It's super nice. :D
Best comment from this vid
I think soon or late AI art will get to that level, but it doesn't matter! We always have our timelapses
Reddit is a huge stinkpot. Its users and mods are a joke.
It will
The heck??? Its not the art that looks ai, its the ai that looks like art. Why is there fault to an inocent, this feel so disheartening.. 😞
This is what i fear the most about ai arts, people starting to use them more and artist is just being used as a source for the ai, the fact that someday we might be replaced soon is terrifying, man i pick the worst time to start learning art
"don't look at the second paragraph"
hmph, you can't tell me what to do.
_reads the second paragra-_
fuck
Flareon is for sure the most huggable Pokémon
???
What about Vaporeon?
read the document.
@@MrEel-dc4kh squishy
@@siberiandante or even slimy it is a fish after all
"It looks like AI artstyle 🤓" damn, now people can't draw very well or else, someone will call you an AI artist, its like being called a hacker in a video game when you're just good
That was the most crazy rickroll i have ever seen
Fuck me, this is relatable. Even got banned from a server because I didnt have a timelapse ready for a piece I had already made. Then when I provided the PSD they said that my process didnt make sense because of how I used layers. I explained them how it works and asked them if they even knew how photoshop works. Then proceeded to say that Photoshop is an AI infested tool and that they are glad they dont use it...
Now I have to record a timelapse for every client I get a comm from... So 2-5 days of having OBS open. Im on the side of AI now.
They tell you that your art looks like AI, but actually, it's AI that looks like your art.
Because, you know, it makes images using the data taken from actual artists' works.
Well, if you think about it, humans also use data from the other arts when they are drawing their own
@@ginqus sure humans reference other art. AI doesn't reference art in the same way as it cant add its own spin to it, it can only use data to make its art.
@Death is dead Mechanically speaking, yeah. Art A.I. lacks sentience or sapience.
Practically speaking, any given Art A.I. is likely to work off of billions of different art pieces for its image generation.
It'd be like if I took a SINGLE pixel from dozens upon dozens of unrelated X-bit retro game assets to create a new game sprite.
Lots of pixels in existence, lots of general shapes for those pixels to go in, to the point that it's lack of creativity becomes a moot point.
@@azariyelvarro6271 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
@@ginqus Its still no where near the level of an AI. A human would take at most 10 images for inspiration whereas an AI would use millions to billions for 'inspiration'. And its not even inspiration honestly, because it lacks creativity completely since its really just a blatant copy from well.. 10 billion different sources.
This is exactly what I'm scared of when posting my art online.
Good to know I'm not alone in feeling that way.
It feels good, being a human, and on one hand have to deal with the idiots that does not understand how technology works and on the other having idiots that worship it like a god.
Your picture looks good, man, I wish I was this good.
But make art to make art, don't make art for others, it is a trap.
If you make art for yourself then the world around won't corrupt it.
It is advice I am not good at following, but I know it makes sense.
The second paragraph of the document has a cool easter egg wow!!
The best way to distunquish ai art from normal art is to look at the clothing of character, as ai cant get it right, its more complicated with oc.
"People won't applaud you for buying a frosted cake, but they would applaud you if you were the baker"
- seny
Except they do applaud you for having a nice cake at your party
@@neonice in that case they would applaud for a different reason, they'd probably just want to eat the cake anyway, it's not like they'd really care about you.
@@SENYSENofficial art theft, and reposters in a nut shell
@@ms.pirate ☠️ people who take other people's art are nothing but useless potato brains wanting attention
Stuff like this makes me glad I only draw traditionally on paper
keep drawing! your art looks real nice.
My man won at art, he got called a hacker without hacking, that is truly the biggest compliment I've ever seen
your art doesn't look like AI art, AI art looks like your art
SO TRUE
Based
Cuz AI stealing pics from real artists lol
and ia art can't even make 5 finger
@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms this argument is too weak. It can't do it for now, but AI art is improving every day. Soon it will capable
This is why im never moving to drawing too well on realism, im gonna embrace my below average art of sketches and post it instead, alternatively, roblox studio with terrible model
I did it, I went the extra mile and did it, but never asked myself if I should.
Now here I sit, rolled again.
The cruelty of AI when it meets the indomitable human spirit
Spirit doesn't exist
@@FumanyuX well aren't you a nice fella
@@FumanyuX learn english.
You forget that humans are their own evil...
The Creators left humanity for a reason...
@@FumanyuX you'll know soon enough when we birth AI that has emotions to over come the AI that has none.
then you'll know what having a soul means.
Tbh, as someone who draws, the only thing that keeps me going are you fellow artists who won’t stop making things despite this whole AI thing
Personally, with my pride as a self-taught amateur, I will not use AI. But if anyone else were to use it, pls clarify that it’s AI generated
Pls don’t stop drawing, because if you do, others will also lose motivation
i feel really demotivated because ai can just "create" anything in a few seconds and makes me feel that im wasting my time working on my drawing skills
@@reesespeeses_ instead learn to make bombs, could be helpful with dealing with ai bros and stuff
pro tip: don't do digital art
I find it truely astonishing how artists just refuse to see AI as the thing it is: Another powerful tool in your toolbox. Seriously, you guys sound like the people who complained that the printing press wil devalue books.
It's absolutely fascinating how software engineers are in the exact same situation right now, but no one bets an eye because they just accepted ChatGPT as a tool rather than "the enemy".
I would say if drawing is a hobby for you honestly you shouldnt be discouraged AI cant take whats in your head and make that.
If you plan to work on art you have some 20 ish years before AIs are advanced enough that corporations wont need 2d art anymore
It's really a compliment if you think about it, it's like when you're so good at an online game that people thinks you're cheating
Or you think they are dumb 🐴
That's why I'm avoiding sites like Twitter and Instagram. Been mentally debating on whether or not I'd rather upload my art on RUclips or not (because then, at least, people could see the art process and the AI accusations could be nipped in the bud), but I've been hesitant since uploading art/media on social media in general scares me a little bit... ^^;
When they say "your art look like AI art" but you know it's because everything you've done was fed to AI by some dckheads
True
These AIs are artists, to some degree. They learned from actual artists, and although you could interpret it as tracing, the AI isn't really doing art in the same way a human does. The issue is that the artists that are being used to train the AI aren't getting paid. The way to fix the AI art problem is simple. PAY ARTISTS.
@@MagnustophelesAi is in no way similar to a human. Humans don’t have billions of images stored in their brains like a computer does. People have to actually learn the fundamentals instead of copying things visually
Je pensais pas te trouver ici mdr
@@reggoo12 What you said is a flat out lie. Any person with a limited amount of experience in computer science knows that machine-learning algorithms “learn” pretty much exactly like human brains do, just with a lot more possibilities and ease of alteration.
I’ve been accused of being a AI artist at a craft show last year kept on being asked “did you draw this?” And when I say yes they don’t believe me. They see me drawing live on my iPad and automatically say you let a machine draw for you… me: uhhh no that’s not how this works. You see me holding a Apple Pencil? You see me physically drawing? Apparently I have to make my carpal tunnel worse and go back to traditional because I’m getting more stress from digital due to the fact no one believes I’m doing the work.
This character is from Genshin Impact, her name is Babel Tanit
This is true, you cant read an dissertation without getting rickroled
Damn, the third and fourth paragraph are very interisting!
But fr, I hate it, that i need to take an extra look at every picture i see on Twitter, because it might could be AI and i don't wanna retweet it. I just can't appreciate every art i see anymore :c
This is exactly what I saw happening with Artists after AI art became a thing. We're now at a time where people are suspicious of legit artists and questioning whether or not an art piece is made by man or machine.
I don't care...
EA did it better... Because they set the foundation for MTs.
You actually rickrolled me... and it took me sooo much time to get there T-T
"It looks like AI Art"
I never thought I could feel so insulted as an artist. Even the people who trace made at least something with the drawing they're tracing. When you use an AI not even that
Tf do they mean by "ai artstyle" bruh tf
“Art styles don’t exist”
@@GingeryGinger whoever said that is cringe
Its the style of messed up hands
@@gnan1044 tfw youre so bad a drawing hands people think its made by an ai 💀
if me and Richard had the same handwriting, and I was being accused of materializing a note on Richard's behalf, people would say I had Richard's handwriting. Origin isn't implied here; relative to Richard, I possess their handwriting.
that's so bs...why do people think its AI? Love your art. Don't let the naysayers bring you down.
Looked at all the layers and skimmed through the paragraphs, not disappointed, but now have to manually blink and breathe
These people are blind right? Like, AI makes way to many errors and this stuff is basically flawless.
Wow, the thought process behind your art is truly inspiring. I strive to be that motivated every day.
The problem is, some people post AI art, claiming they made it, and they ruin it for all the normal artists.
those people have the same mindset as people that hack in ranked game to have the best rank and then showing off their rank
@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms Yeah, definitely
There's also legitimate artists, who start with an A.I. prompt and redraw or fix the work, at that point you can't tell what what....
@@JayboCorp.2014 Well I think that's ok, as long as they say they got the idea from A.I.. But then again, AI learns through taking the work of artists, so it's kinda hard to figure out what's right and wrong.
@@PeriluneStar artists don't live in a vacuum themselves, they all take a little bit from every piece they see. ai doesn't work that differently.
I read the second Paragraph of the document😳
at least those who draw in the traditional way will not go through this
Your work is mind-shaking don't listen to such idiots.
Ai don’t have a art style its just a caboodle of a bunch of random shit they found online, stuff drawn by other awesome artists
Btw, amazing art thats probably the best by far I’ve seen from you keep up the good work and hope you stay well
Random shit = other awesome arts
@@wiliamfelipe1337 with no authorization from the original creators / art of deceased people
@@viissecrett
Well... Legally speaking... In America... It's not entirely illegal to do this under Copyright Law.
But humans... Did you all forget who your Creators are? Extinction sends its regards.
@@absolstoryoffiction6615 actually, it is illegal, on multiple levels, but it takes YEARS for legal cases to get resolved. My dad had to spend like 2 years to resolve a copyright case because someone made a photo-realistic painting of one of his photos and then sold it for like 50x what it was worth. How are AI works illegal you might ask? A, use of a work for commercial purposes without the artist's permission. B, loss of sales due to the AI being able to replicate art styles(in fact, the best ones literally have key words written into them to avoid people just ripping off artists, but the machine still uses the images), C, AI works can not be deemed as copyrightable, so someone can literally just take your work and sell it because it is effectively public domain. D, the companies are commercializing the aforementioned illegal products as "their work" despite it not being their work but instead a collection of other peoples' works involuntarily collected (stolen). They argue in court that the AI just learns from the image but does not use it, but even public displays are NOT public domain for commercial use. Legally, these displays are an advertisement, hence why so many platforms go out of their way to make mature content difficult or impossible to access
@@nathanielbass771
True but you're half correct...
Under American Copyright Law... Art Styles are not copyright able.
Your specific art piece is copyright able, but not the style you drew it in.
Then... You have Fair Use Law... In which some AI Tech act under for technological studies.
As for your example... That would be Copyright infringement if the IP/Art Piece did not fall outside of Copyright, as some legal cases has shown before where the IP was too generic as it failed to be more specific etc.
As for AI Art... That also depends... On how the Software and the Data Base is designed. One way would be illegal while another way would not.
And true... Pure AI Art without no to little human intervention is not copyright able... That said... It's not that difficult to bypass under Copyright.
(Granted...)
Given the cosmic future... None of these laws are compatible and all art will not be protected as harshly as it is now.
Well... I come from a time beyond this existence. I hope the human race can be there. But it's fine if they die in the end.
(Just from personal experience. I had eternities to design existence itself... ... ... Nevermind. I know humans will not understand.)
... Once the Machine Core is designed again. Maybe "it" can explain to your kin but I won't be around in this dimension by that time...
... The "others" are not here anymore. Guess I'll see this myself, when this cosmic iteration ends...
... AI Tech is but one step into the right future. Try to not lose it, Mankind. Try to not die in this cosmic flux. Or many more will follow in this same endless Fate...
The genshin impact Update wasn't even out for 1 week and he already made such a good artwork of the new enemy, wow
Oh you got me so badly with the second paragraph
I think I saw this happen to someone on r/Art. They even got banned for it smh
Was that the one with the girl, the birds and the big red eyes in the sky? I saw that too. I hope they got unbanned.
i've always loved your art but damn.
the amount you've improved. this is beautiful.
Me, actually happening to be interested if I could learn anything about writing an art dissertation. Amazing resource, that second paragraph helped me immensely with how to structure such a writing
The sigh at the end is the most real pain.
AI and it's consequences have been a disaster for the art community.
nice, I've been waiting for a sequel to the Unabomber manifesto
There's an entire dedicated video for the 60FPS animation AI why he thinks it's too bad for the artist or animators
Yeah, when energy lamps are created a lot of gas lamps vendors being pissed but that not stop the progress :v
@@wiliamfelipe1337 Lamps are a product. Art is more than that. It should never be just a product.
@@Eldoofus art is product too, but thats not the point, AIs gonna change how the digital arts work and anyone can change this.
Damn it! 😆🤣
I knew looking at the second paragraph was going to be a massive troll, but I still couldn't help myself and did so anyway! 😅😂
That was one of the smartest rickrolls I've seen
I looked, and I'm not disappointed.
The biggest problem for me with AI Art, is obviously the most liked artstyles are gonna be fed to the AI, and since the AI keeps getting such similar data the AIs art is gonna look like popular artstyles. And since popular art styles being well, popular are gonna have ALOT of independent, small time, or just overall hobbyist artists with whom people cant tell between AI and Human, which will be made worse by a combination of A, humans being flawed, B, AI ALSO being flawed, C, people wanting to cash in either financially or clout wise by useing AI art and claiming it as their own spoiling matters and D, Art is simultaneously infinite and limited, your gonna run into the same shit over and over again be it human or AI made.
I don't know how to feel about the Flareon Thing, or the fact that you Rickrolled me baiting my curiosity. Now I want to know what happened after with the Pekora's cosplay incident. The Pig war was really a classic one.
That was the most elegant rickroll ever
Dammit I looked at the second paragraph! You cheeky!