I can only imagine this guy looking through the comments losing his mind because he expected serious questions and suggestions, but instead got people talking about "outstanding move" and ballistic missiles
@@quantumblur_3145 You think void is your ally? You merely adopted the void. I was born in it. Molded by it. I didn't see serious content untiI was already a man. By then it was nothing but boring! The internet betrays you because it belongs to me!
Literally just came from that video too haha; you’re not wrong though, an intercontinental ballistic missile would indeed be a more effective way of ending the game as quickly as possible, while maintaining material and development on the board, whereas your opponent f***ing dies.
The great thing about that one is NOT ONLY, do you destroy their defense, you also destroy their pride. You also completely annihilate them, effectively wiping you, the game, AND your opponent off the face of the Earth, but that's okay, because you win
10:46 I think you missed an opportunity to take advantage of black's position by firing an RT-2PM2 "Topol-M" cold-launched three-stage solid-propellant silo-based Intercontinental Ballistic Missile to attack their remaining pieces.
Of course, if you are a beginner at chess, you can also use the BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile fired from an M3 Bradley Cavalry Fighting Vehicle tracked armored reconaissance vehicle instead.
I personally choose the 9M123 Khrizantema-M supersonic tandem charge laser and radar guided anti tank guided missile, launched from its host vehicle, the 9P157-2 Khrizantema-S tracked ATGM carrier, which is based on the BMP-3 tracked amphibious infantry fighting vehicle, carrying 7 soldiers all wielding AK-12 assault rifles chambered in 5.45x39, which was originally armed with a 2A42 30mm gas operated air cooled autocannon capable of firing both high explosive incendiary rounds and armor piercing discarding sabot rounds and a 2A70 100mm low pressure gun-launcher capable of firing either 3OF70 high explosive fragmentation rounds or 9M117 Bastion tandem charge anti tank guided missiles.
4:55 Rookie mistake, Kevin. This is a prime opportunity to attack using your Intercontinental Ballistic Missile peice! You could have a favorable board condition in just a single move, but you blundered it just to protect your queen. Unbelievable.
True I’ve used the ICBM variation against everyone In my family and lost to it, It’s there fault to be within the range of my privately owned missile silo.
Could you please teach us the intercontinental ballistic missile variation? This is good, but I am not very skilled at using semi-automatic guns like you do in the video. I'm more of an explosions guy, you know? Do it for all of us watching your videos that are like I.
I had the exact situation you describe at 7:40 into the video occur during a game against an aggressive player, his position fell apart pretty quickly after he lost his queen. I like this gambit a lot when playing white against aggressive players, because even a good handful of experienced ones will put their foot in their mouth by mid game.
I don't use the ICBM variation, but when I do, I prefer the LGM-25C "Titan II" cold-launched 2-stage liquid-propellant silo-based intercontinental ballistic missile.
I used the same tactic against my friend, but instead of putting pressures because Im a rookie,I launched an ICBM from the nearest missile pod within 2000m, taking control over the board and won the game
Put aside the IBCM Variation meme, this is probably my favorite gambit as any 1k I fight, they usually us Scandinavian defence and they panicked once they lose their Queen.
i remember in school i bragged about being the best chess player. so then i was challenged by one of my classmates. We didn't use any strategies like this because we didn't know they existed. we were such equal matches for each other that we got an even amount of checkmates and in our tiebreaker battle (that the entire class watched) it ended in a stalemate. we agreed that we were equally good and moved on.
At 12:41 I prefer d3, black will most of the time capture exd3, followed by Bxd3. This sets up a little trap. If black does not pay attention and play h6 to kick out the knight (what I see most of the time), then after Nxf7, Kxf7, Bg6+, you win the Queen. If he doesnt recapture the knight, you win the rook.
I play this gambit a lot in 1 minute chess, as I tend to play 1. e4 xx 2. Nf3 against the Sicilian and the Italian, and the odd Scandinavian defense messes up my premoves.
5 00 the best move would be knight foreking quen and rook, black's knight takes it if he doesn't u win a rook so he has 2 take it, then u give an unsopable check bishop f7 he takes it with king you take his queen and u have ur quen on d8 winning a game easly, he takes ur knight with pon u take it with rook after all of that ur a queen up and only bishop and knight down with a quen that can snap off enemy pown and pieces. ^>^
there's a trap i got caught on where you move d3 and if he eats, you eat with bishop then sac the knight and bishop to check the king and eat his queen
The pawn on f7 should be captured by the bishop after exposing's it. Then, keeping the knight at the same square, move to d6. The next move is obvious. The king will be in check, so he will move out, becoming exposed to other piece attacks.
This gambit is also called the Lviv Gambit (W. Litmanowicz, J. Giżycki, "Chess from A to Z), similarly in Russia and Ukraine. Many years ago I played several games by correspondence with good results. Then I came up with a more attractive gambit on the theme of this gambit: 1.e4 e6 2.f4 d5 3.Nf3 (J.Konikowski www.bdf-fernschachbund.de/service/theorieartikel/c00-20140516.pdf ). I have shown selected games on my blog: krolaszachykor.blogspot.com
At 1:34 he says "queen's gonna have to come here".That is wrong because you could put your bishop there.Alsomis would be stupid to put your queen to e7 because it will get taken but it won't really matter if you lost you bishop
hi I'm still relatively new to chess, but why do you keep mentioning bishop to f7 instead of knight to f7? doesn't knight to f7 fork the rook and the queen? whereas if you move bishop to f7, they can simply just move the king out of the way
Forcing the king to move is the point, it prevent's castling and means it's exposed for the rest of the game.Knight to f7 wins the rook but you lose the knight and have just moved the same piece 4 times.
The main point behind Bf7+ is to force the king to lose castling rights which means hes clumsy and stumbling all over the board for the foreseeable future. You can rapidly develop your pieces after that point sometimes utilizing tempos on the king because you can develop and make threats simultaneously. If the opponent is defending the entire time, it is very difficult to get any sort of coordination with their pieces. That is what the entire spirit of gambits like these are about. Rapid development and making threats by getting a massive lead in development.
I use this to players who can't do well without a Queen. It's like sending a message. Ps: I don't care if the Queen is protected. If your Queen is open, I'mma take it. Welcome to endgame where I Reign supreme
Nice video. Just a piece of advice. You should start with the most common response/move in your videos. Most common move in this line does not show up until 12 minutes in. People who are really serious about using this line in their games aren't going to wait that long overall.
because if you don't the rook is hanging if block bishop than white takes the rook or same if you block with the knight so you have to defend with queen to pin white's queen to the king
10:05, theres a good trap instead of pawn d3, Qe2 sets up Qb5+, forks the bishop and b7 square. Theres nothing black can do to save both of them. Ive played this in online blitz and rapid alot, as its my main repertoire against scandinavian. and 5/10 times people rated 13-1600 lose the bishop at this juncture by not seeing its hanging and attacked, 3/10 times they bring the bishop back, but then Qxb7, attacking the rook. black plays Bc6, but then Bb5 pins the bishop, and white wins at least an exchange. If they blunder and play Qd7, then Bxc6, Qxc6 and white mates with Q c8#
The other 2/10 times black defends properly and the game more or less equalizes. The Tennison is much like the Budapest Gambit for white. Therefore there are chances for black to equalize. However, in such lines, white usually manages to win back the pawn. One thing to watch out for in Qe2 line is blacks b knight forking on c3. Its not always a problem because it often gets trapped on a1, and white will still be up material. Another dangerous move to meet is Bg4 early, attacking whites queen. It often provokes the move f3, but there are times when Qh4+ and blacks b knight coming to b4 or d4 (threatening to capture on c2) create more threats than white can defend
The video looks at lines where black returns the pawn after playing ..e5. Nxe4 follows then black can play ..f5. Black then plays Ng3. But the video does not consider the natural move ..Be6 covering the a2-g8 diagonal. 1. e4 d5 2. Nf3 dxe4 3. Ng5 e5 4. Nxe4 f5 5. Ng3 Be6 6. Qf3 (−1.2 Stockfish) e4 7. Qd1 Nc6 Stockfish, however, recommends 6. Bb5+. 6. Bb5+ Nd7 7. d4 c6 8. Be2 Qh4 9. de 0-0-0 (0.1 stockflish) In blitz, I think black has the advantage in the above position after queenside castling just because black's position is easier to play in a fast time control. And now black becomes the gambiteer.
Guys stop it with the advanced moves, if you are a beginner you may you an anti-tank guided missile. In my example we would use a BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile launched from an M3 Bradley.
Non-ICBM question: At 2:04 can't black just play f4 now that h5 is defended? Edit: NVM you can still just play knight to H5 and trade with the same idea as before I'm dumb sry
Knight sac on F7 gives white all the play he wants. He's fine with dropping the pawn and rook to start tearing down the king, assuming of course that black makes a mistake. If Black knows what he's doing, this not a very sound gambit by any measure, much like the urusov gambit (cool and threatening, but weak against perfect play).
u play knight to e5 at 0.44 black always plays pawn to f6 and then you bring out your queen to h5, the result is either you get a rook for the horse or you check mate your opponent. This version of the opening is quite flawed sorry
I'm getting this as black in bullet chess after Scandinavian Opening. My focus is in protecting the King's Bishop pawn and trading off pieces. I don't go to too much trouble to hold on to that pawn and I get a good game. It's an open attacking game, so anything I can do to simplify or close it up is good. Let me know what you guys think.
I think you need to try a Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missile. If that seems to intimidating, you can always make do with an anti tank guided missile instead.
um i thought you said don't trade your white square bishop for a horse because white square bishops for white are much more important....@thechesswebsite
![Win A Queen in 10 Popular Openings [Tricks & TRAPS to Fool Your Opponents]](/img/1.gif)
I can only imagine this guy looking through the comments losing his mind because he expected serious questions and suggestions, but instead got people talking about "outstanding move" and ballistic missiles
😂
You offer your thoughts to the void, you accept the risk that the void has an inside joke about your contribution
@@quantumblur_3145 I am well aware of the void. I'm quite into the void, in truth
@@quantumblur_3145 You think void is your ally? You merely adopted the void. I was born in it. Molded by it. I didn't see serious content untiI was already a man. By then it was nothing but boring!
The internet betrays you because it belongs to me!
@@crimsonstrykr the void has already touched me, we're all marked.
You forgot to launch the ICBM to control the board
Clearly an amatuer
i guess the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Variation of the Tennison gambit wasn’t really popular back then
I see what you did there ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
It is now 👍
I see you too, are here from the same video
can you teach us the intercontinental ballistic missile variation?
Literally just came from that video too haha; you’re not wrong though, an intercontinental ballistic missile would indeed be a more effective way of ending the game as quickly as possible, while maintaining material and development on the board, whereas your opponent f***ing dies.
The great thing about that one is NOT ONLY, do you destroy their defense, you also destroy their pride. You also completely annihilate them, effectively wiping you, the game, AND your opponent off the face of the Earth, but that's okay, because you win
Yes
ruclips.net/video/E2xNlzsnPCQ/видео.html
10:46 I think you missed an opportunity to take advantage of black's position by firing an RT-2PM2 "Topol-M" cold-launched three-stage solid-propellant silo-based Intercontinental Ballistic Missile to attack their remaining pieces.
was looking for this xD
Of course, if you are a beginner at chess, you can also use the BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile fired from an M3 Bradley Cavalry Fighting Vehicle tracked armored reconaissance vehicle instead.
@@TeamGentlementlemen oh thanks next time
However, if you are beginner at chess, you can use anti-tank guided missile instead
True
I personally choose the 9M123 Khrizantema-M supersonic tandem charge laser and radar guided anti tank guided missile, launched from its host vehicle, the 9P157-2 Khrizantema-S tracked ATGM carrier, which is based on the BMP-3 tracked amphibious infantry fighting vehicle, carrying 7 soldiers all wielding AK-12 assault rifles chambered in 5.45x39, which was originally armed with a 2A42 30mm gas operated air cooled autocannon capable of firing both high explosive incendiary rounds and armor piercing discarding sabot rounds and a 2A70 100mm low pressure gun-launcher capable of firing either 3OF70 high explosive fragmentation rounds or 9M117 Bastion tandem charge anti tank guided missiles.
I see I am not the only one who watched that video and Googled the Tennison Gambit. Lol
@@RedVRCC eeeeeeeee
@@RedVRCCWHAT DA FA-
I’ve unironically searched this beacause of the meme
Lmao me to
Hahaha I actually love this opening and I’m happy the meme taught me about it
lmao me too
@@ghoool756 This meme has made me interested in chess all of a sudden.
The missile video?
you know you have to launch the RS-24 Yars, MIRV thermonuclear ICBM to make sure that you are in control of the board.
4:55 Rookie mistake, Kevin. This is a prime opportunity to attack using your Intercontinental Ballistic Missile peice! You could have a favorable board condition in just a single move, but you blundered it just to protect your queen. Unbelievable.
He could have just used an me Bradley ifv's BGM-71b TOW ATGMs if he wasn't familiar with ICBMs. People these days....
@Aizen Reyes (2022) out dated ppl are upgrading their queens to diamonds so its more resistant i would go for a B-13 nuclear ☢️ atomic bomb
@@_phantastic_1744 nah , it's better to go for antimatter bomb.
I don't see it, the king is next to the queen
As an actual chess player, the icbm missile variantation is much better.
True I’ve used the ICBM variation against everyone In my family and lost to it, It’s there fault to be within the range of my privately owned missile silo.
You mean the RT-2PM2 topol-m cold-launched three-stage solid-propellant silo-based intercontinental ballistic missile variation?
People watching
1% - to learn how to play the opening
99% - here to launch the intercontinental ballistic missile to attack black's remaining pieces
I’m that one precent.
@@littleman4925 same
Time stamps for opponents third move.
0:40 e5
3:49 f5
6:57 Qd5
9:17 Bf5
12:24 Nf6
13:55 Nc6
10:46 The Launch of a RT2Pm "Topol" 3 stage Solid Propellant Silo Based Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.
Just a small reminder, ATGM works as well and is recommended for beginner.
Could you please teach us the intercontinental ballistic missile variation? This is good, but I am not very skilled at using semi-automatic guns like you do in the video. I'm more of an explosions guy, you know? Do it for all of us watching your videos that are like I.
Instructions unclear. Accidentally launched intercontinental ballistic missile into black pieces.
I'd much rather use an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
you forgot to launch RT-2PM2 Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
Can you go over specifically when you launch the missile?
This is one of those videos I wish I had my webcam going show I could do visuals alongside the video.
New to chess, implemented this strategy, everyone on school got rekt ;)
Thug life😎
Well To be fair, firing ATGMs at anyone will insure a quick and easy victory.
@@drgenmo8340 nice 👍
@@drgenmo8340 nice 👍
@@drgenmo8340 nice 🤟
I had the exact situation you describe at 7:40 into the video occur during a game against an aggressive player, his position fell apart pretty quickly after he lost his queen. I like this gambit a lot when playing white against aggressive players, because even a good handful of experienced ones will put their foot in their mouth by mid game.
Did you use a Topol or regular ATGM?
@@张桓瑜 definitely not submarine
I don't use the ICBM variation, but when I do, I prefer the LGM-25C "Titan II" cold-launched 2-stage liquid-propellant silo-based intercontinental ballistic missile.
It blows my mind how it took 16 minutes to explain the basics of ONE OPENING
It only takes 90 minutes for your Topol-M to reach anywhere in the world.
I used the same tactic against my friend, but instead of putting pressures because Im a rookie,I launched an ICBM from the nearest missile pod within 2000m, taking control over the board and won the game
wow, that's not rookie at all
I used the anti tank guided missile instead
8:20 pawn on b2 is free to take by queen on e5
7:37 black queen is not trapped, she can go to g4 and exchange. But in the end, white will either win black's rook or bishop.
But white can launch an intercontinental missile to gain control over the board and trap the queen
Put aside the IBCM Variation meme, this is probably my favorite gambit as any 1k I fight, they usually us Scandinavian defence and they panicked once they lose their Queen.
i remember in school i bragged about being the best chess player. so then i was challenged by one of my classmates. We didn't use any strategies like this because we didn't know they existed. we were such equal matches for each other that we got an even amount of checkmates and in our tiebreaker battle (that the entire class watched) it ended in a stalemate. we agreed that we were equally good and moved on.
Why didn't you use a Topol?
I see absolute scholars in the comment section, keep on firing bois
This guy has been through a lot first ppl blow up his queens gambit variation and now the intercontinental ballistic missile variation
At 12:41 I prefer d3, black will most of the time capture exd3, followed by Bxd3. This sets up a little trap. If black does not pay attention and play h6 to kick out the knight (what I see most of the time), then after Nxf7, Kxf7, Bg6+, you win the Queen. If he doesnt recapture the knight, you win the rook.
I watched that meme and now youtube thinks i know how to play chesss
It sent me a note that said you are a chess expert. Congrats.
@@chesswebsite i think you got the wrong guy
I keep going into this by accident when rushing the opening and not noticing the opponent played d5 XD
Update: After checking the king with the bishop, You can now release an ICBM and the game is already over.
At 7:32 The queen is not trapped. The correct variation is Bxd3 Qxg2 Be4 Qg4 Qxg4 Bxg4 Bxb7.
SuperRellik123 bxd3??????
wouldn't be bxg4 attacking the white queen?
@@pthiago_s5075 the black queen is trapped and the only move is Qg4, trying to exchange queen, but after the exchange white win a rook with bishop b7
Nice, another opening video! Love these!
0% Comments about the Gambit
100% Comments about ICBM
8:12 move the white square bishop and you trap the king, if you can draw the queen away then move it to B5 it’s checkmate
I play this gambit a lot in 1 minute chess, as I tend to play 1. e4 xx 2. Nf3 against the Sicilian and the Italian, and the odd Scandinavian defense messes up my premoves.
5 00 the best move would be knight foreking quen and rook, black's knight takes it if he doesn't u win a rook so he has 2 take it, then u give an unsopable check bishop f7 he takes it with king you take his queen and u have ur quen on d8 winning a game easly, he takes ur knight with pon u take it with rook after all of that ur a queen up and only bishop and knight down with a quen that can snap off enemy pown and pieces. ^>^
i hope i am right and i hope i haven't done many mistakes, cos i am from poland not speaking Eng very well. ^.^
I shall try to play because I like so much the concept for attacking and activity of the pieces
there's a trap i got caught on where you move d3 and if he eats, you eat with bishop then sac the knight and bishop to check the king and eat his queen
4:00 pawn to f5 is the best way to defend according to modern engines
The pawn on f7 should be captured by the bishop after exposing's it. Then, keeping the knight at the same square, move to d6. The next move is obvious. The king will be in check, so he will move out, becoming exposed to other piece attacks.
This gambit is also called the Lviv Gambit (W. Litmanowicz, J. Giżycki, "Chess from A to Z), similarly in Russia and Ukraine. Many years ago I played several games by correspondence with good results.
Then I came up with a more attractive gambit on the theme of this gambit: 1.e4 e6 2.f4 d5 3.Nf3 (J.Konikowski www.bdf-fernschachbund.de/service/theorieartikel/c00-20140516.pdf ). I have shown selected games on my blog: krolaszachykor.blogspot.com
Thanks for that pretty interesting gambit, surely i'll try that :)
12:35 d3 if they take, then take back with bishop; whatever they do next knight sac on f7, then bishop check g6 then take their queen.
At 1:34 he says "queen's gonna have to come here".That is wrong because you could put your bishop there.Alsomis would be stupid to put your queen to e7 because it will get taken but it won't really matter if you lost you bishop
Qe7 is the only move pinning the white Queen on the e-file therfore preventing white from capturing the Rook on h8
I love this opening
hi I'm still relatively new to chess, but why do you keep mentioning bishop to f7 instead of knight to f7? doesn't knight to f7 fork the rook and the queen? whereas if you move bishop to f7, they can simply just move the king out of the way
That also bugs me a lot. I would instantly go for knight f7.
Mike Zhang if you take with the knight I'm pretty sure they sac the rook and attack right away
Forcing the king to move is the point, it prevent's castling and means it's exposed for the rest of the game.Knight to f7 wins the rook but you lose the knight and have just moved the same piece 4 times.
sometimes Nf7 can backfire so baldly when your bishop is on c4 and unprotected. gotta watch out for Moves like Qd4
The main point behind Bf7+ is to force the king to lose castling rights which means hes clumsy and stumbling all over the board for the foreseeable future. You can rapidly develop your pieces after that point sometimes utilizing tempos on the king because you can develop and make threats simultaneously. If the opponent is defending the entire time, it is very difficult to get any sort of coordination with their pieces. That is what the entire spirit of gambits like these are about. Rapid development and making threats by getting a massive lead in development.
You could trap the queen for the line where the knight moves to f6
I use this to players who can't do well without a Queen.
It's like sending a message.
Ps: I don't care if the Queen is protected. If your Queen is open, I'mma take it. Welcome to endgame where I Reign supreme
Is that message in the form of an intercontinental ballistic missile?
@@RedVRCC He sounds like a beginner, so probably ATGM knstead
If you can actually guide your opponent into d5 by starting with knight f3
i wanna get good at chess for the sole reason of cracking a smile when i outplay the other person and destroy them
Literally
Nice video. Just a piece of advice. You should start with the most common response/move in your videos. Most common move in this line does not show up until 12 minutes in. People who are really serious about using this line in their games aren't going to wait that long overall.
Well, but there isn't much for white after Nf6 and e6 so it would be hard to sell the gambit ;D It's not a very good opening for serious players
1:35 why would anyone defend the king with their queen when they have their knight and bishop who can both defend the king?
because if you don't the rook is hanging if block bishop than white takes the rook or same if you block with the knight so you have to defend with queen to pin white's queen to the king
Because if it fails you can launch your ICBM
@@Quacktum oh ya sorry my bad I forgot about that
@@uhhbonk ye
Ironically, I got a chess ad before this
God of chess lesson!
Thank you.
Cool video, thanks!
Love these! Thanks!!
10:05, theres a good trap instead of pawn d3, Qe2 sets up Qb5+, forks the bishop and b7 square. Theres nothing black can do to save both of them. Ive played this in online blitz and rapid alot, as its my main repertoire against scandinavian. and 5/10 times people rated 13-1600 lose the bishop at this juncture by not seeing its hanging and attacked, 3/10 times they bring the bishop back, but then Qxb7, attacking the rook. black plays Bc6, but then Bb5 pins the bishop, and white wins at least an exchange. If they blunder and play Qd7, then Bxc6, Qxc6 and white mates with Q c8#
The other 2/10 times black defends properly and the game more or less equalizes. The Tennison is much like the Budapest Gambit for white. Therefore there are chances for black to equalize. However, in such lines, white usually manages to win back the pawn.
One thing to watch out for in Qe2 line is blacks b knight forking on c3. Its not always a problem because it often gets trapped on a1, and white will still be up material.
Another dangerous move to meet is Bg4 early, attacking whites queen. It often provokes the move f3, but there are times when Qh4+ and blacks b knight coming to b4 or d4 (threatening to capture on c2) create more threats than white can defend
But... i am not sure you explained what's gambit actually gambit heree
The video looks at lines where black returns the pawn after playing ..e5. Nxe4 follows then black can play ..f5. Black then plays Ng3. But the video does not consider the natural move ..Be6 covering the a2-g8 diagonal.
1. e4 d5
2. Nf3 dxe4
3. Ng5 e5
4. Nxe4 f5
5. Ng3 Be6
6. Qf3 (−1.2 Stockfish) e4
7. Qd1 Nc6
Stockfish, however, recommends 6. Bb5+.
6. Bb5+ Nd7
7. d4 c6
8. Be2 Qh4
9. de 0-0-0 (0.1 stockflish)
In blitz, I think black has the advantage in the above position after queenside castling just because black's position is easier to play in a fast time control. And now black becomes the gambiteer.
1:33 What about the bishop? Moving the bishop to E7 instead would be better, wouldn't it?
It would not. Then white would take the rook on h8 and the game is lost. Queen to e7 stops the white queen from moving.
ICBMxd8 sounds like a more solid variation tbh
thank you !!!
Please make a video on Greko Gambit :) Btw I missed your videos ;-;
what if they decline and instead defend their pawn with a knight to c6 at the beginning of the game?
What about h6 to kick the knight away? That would be my instinctive move.
Unfortunately it runs into the ICBM variation ;D
Guys stop it with the advanced moves, if you are a beginner you may you an anti-tank guided missile. In my example we would use a BGM-71 TOW anti-tank missile launched from an M3 Bradley.
I keep unintentionally making this gambit in bullet xd
When my opponents play 2.Nf3 after 1.e4-d5 I alway think, that he is not looking at the board at all :-) But Fun to watch !
I like how every single comment is about the intercontinental ballistic missile
It's true.
Non-ICBM question:
At 2:04 can't black just play f4 now that h5 is defended?
Edit: NVM you can still just play knight to H5 and trade with the same idea as before I'm dumb sry
Well I suppose I have to learn this
Yes you do.
4:53 or play Nf7 after Nxf7 Bxf7 u win the queen
1:31 they can protect with bishop
They can't, you take the rook for free in that case
Why is there only a few people here not talking about GM Vikram Rahul Abhishek Pranav Rajesh's new strategy?
6:36
Instead pawn to d3 I would put bishop to e6 in order to trade bishops with my knight in order to make a check and take blacks queen
Its not forced and easily avoidable, but that fork is looming in the position definately good to think about
7:33 queen not trap . black Queen play g4 and it saved by bishop
What should be done if one is bringing Queen too early in the game?
Lol, all the comments are after the running gag
yep
You didn't go over nf6, d3 trick pxp bxp and say black plays h6 (huge blunder)
at 8:14 moving the bishop lets the black queen take the pawn on b2 right?
yes i have seen this too it is a mistake from the video or a bad variante?
i guess Nd2 then gives white brilliant play?!
Knight sac on F7 gives white all the play he wants. He's fine with dropping the pawn and rook to start tearing down the king, assuming of course that black makes a mistake. If Black knows what he's doing, this not a very sound gambit by any measure, much like the urusov gambit (cool and threatening, but weak against perfect play).
Is it enough play for white, though?
in my opinion yes!
Pawn to d3 we’ve kinda seen this move before
can you make a video on fried liver attack declined
At 1:34, why would he move his queen in front of the king isntead of the bishop? The bishop will screen without sacrificing the queen.
This is very similar to the Budapest Gambit.
what if the e4 pawn is defended by the light squared bishop early on, what does white do then?
1:33 why dont the block with the bishop, thatll prevent a queen trade
But what about the jizzilian defense?
you might save me
Well the first thing black will do after Ng5 is f6. So that blows up your gambit. What am I missing?
stockfish recommends pawn e6 not Nh6
1:33 couldn’t they use their bishop there?
thanks for the free bishop
Edit: didn't realize black can use their dark squared bishop or their knight
Dude where is the ICBM?
8:18 After Qe5 I think Be3 is wrong cuz they can play Qxb2 trapping the rook
It doesnt trap the rook, simply move knight d2 to def with queen and develop in the proces
u play knight to e5 at 0.44 black always plays pawn to f6 and then you bring out your queen to h5, the result is either you get a rook for the horse or you check mate your opponent. This version of the opening is quite flawed sorry
Can you make a video on the trumpowski attack
viren desai trump attack?
wow
Thiago Silva what about it
I played it against a computer with white and i got destroyed in just 6 moves. lol
1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 Ne4 3.Bf4 c5 4.d5 Qb6 5.b3 Qf6 6.Bc1 Qxf2#
Lukas Cohen I miss spell like to know how to play
what?
I'm getting this as black in bullet chess after Scandinavian Opening. My focus is in protecting the King's Bishop pawn and trading off pieces. I don't go to too much trouble to hold on to that pawn and I get a good game. It's an open attacking game, so anything I can do to simplify or close it up is good. Let me know what you guys think.
I think you need to try a Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missile. If that seems to intimidating, you can always make do with an anti tank guided missile instead.
@@RedVRCC Oh man, what a trappy opening. If only I can master it, I'll be unbeatable in bullet.
um i thought you said don't trade your white square bishop for a horse because white square bishops for white are much more important....@thechesswebsite
6:31 Why would you take f7 with the bishop? You could take there with the knight and get black's Rook no matter what they do.
You’re technically exchanging 2 pieces for a rool meaning you’re not really winning much