Can we just get ATC a conversion table of “fuel in time” to “fuel in pounds” for every aircraft type so they don’t have to keep asking this every single time there’s an emergency? I swear that no matter which way the pilot says it, ATC will always want it the other way.
ATC wants minutes, fire and rescue want pounds. The pilot should be asked and answer in minutes ATC should convert, the conversion based only on aircraft type will be inaccurate but that is fine, fire and rescue only need an order of magnitude anyway. But there is no hope for what I wrote to happen as currently ATC can't even convert Kg to pounds.
Because fuel in time varies based on atmospheric conditions, aircraft loading, engine type and performance, and control configuration. And, the pilots can just get it from their flight computer. So, rather than ATC attempting to figure out all of the things the pilots already know, let's have them coordinate the airspace and get the emergency aircraft on the ground. Okay? Thanks.
Female pilot’s enunciation is excellent. Soooo many pilots/ co pilots and ATC raddle off information in seemingly unrecognizable speech. I realize they repeat information over and over and over thousands of times but damn. Her speech legibility is outstanding.
I love these videos. Have worked in many workplaces in my life and it's amusing how even the smallest of glitches can get folks panicking and running around screaming like idiots. Having been an industrial first aid attendant I appreciate how rigorous training prepares one to remain calm and focused on the job at hand when things go sideways. Trust your skills, communicate and when the emergency (and the inevitable paperwork) is done with, then you can let your legs turn to jelly. I would never compare my experience with that of of pilots or ATC, but the principle is the same. Learn, train, practice so you're ready when something happens.
"infants or hazmat"? well.. sometimes infants are worse than hazmat(biohazard)... I did not know that infants can have explosive diarrhea until I was on a TPAC flight. two hours into the flight, we had to turn around because of it. The flight was 100% full in all classes, so there was no place to reseat the two row that were affected(6 or 8 passengers) Fortunately, I was about 5 rows behinds them. After we landed, it caused almost 7 hours of delay. (a new crew had to be brought in)
Hi anderia didn't realize you guys had this same issue last week's what's needs to be done test on them you get brand new test drives or checks out before putting them to use 😢
I don’t get why the atc data link can’t be used to request fuel and passengers instead of having to ask pilots. I get the reason but geez, if a planes going down, atc asks if they want sugar with their tea!
Excuse my ignorance here, but why do I routinely see clearances for runways labeled "L" or "R", but the aircrafts land on the opposing side? (IOW, why are runways labeled incorrectly?).
They are not labelled "incorrectly"...the number is based on the runway's compass heading (rounded to the nearest 10 degrees and the last number truncated) and the Left and Right is always just literally how 2 parallel runways are labelled from the perspective of the approaching plane. SO, the same runway will have 2 different names depending on what direction the plane is landing (or taking off) on. As an example, the runway in this video, 26R is called 8L when coming from the other direction.
You know, i have watched a lot of your videos, why at the beginning of the video, where it has like a letter "R" and real atc like a movie rating, why is the "R" like half outside the box? Is it by design? My ocd screams everytime
If you blame Boeing for this, then you will have to blame Airbus for QF33, AF66, groundings of A320NEO and A220 planes caused by PW issues, the bankruptcy of GoFirst caused by PW issues, and last November’s China Eastern A330 incident
ATC clearly asked which engine was out - it was the right one according to pilots. Pilots didn't seem to have a problem with their exit off the runway, more if their brakes were overheating.
Boeing has a problem and I don't want any part in it. One plane loses an engine the day after delivery from Boeing, another loses all stab trim control within 40hrs total after delivery, another returns after windshield cracks at cruising altituded, engine fires, contained and uncontained engine failures, loose bolts, missing bolts and a door plug blowout at 16,000'. After all that, the CEO of Boeing leaves his comfy home on the east coast for a rare visit to Renton to bs about safety. Not getting on any Boeing until heads roll including its CEO.
Engine issues are not Boeing’s fault. If Boeing is to blame for that kind of issue, then Airbus must be to blame for the China Eastern A330 incident last November. Also, Airbus has had their share of cracked windshields so if Boeing is to blame for that, then so must Airbus.
Can we just get ATC a conversion table of “fuel in time” to “fuel in pounds” for every aircraft type so they don’t have to keep asking this every single time there’s an emergency? I swear that no matter which way the pilot says it, ATC will always want it the other way.
ATC wants minutes, fire and rescue want pounds. The pilot should be asked and answer in minutes ATC should convert, the conversion based only on aircraft type will be inaccurate but that is fine, fire and rescue only need an order of magnitude anyway. But there is no hope for what I wrote to happen as currently ATC can't even convert Kg to pounds.
Because fuel in time varies based on atmospheric conditions, aircraft loading, engine type and performance, and control configuration. And, the pilots can just get it from their flight computer. So, rather than ATC attempting to figure out all of the things the pilots already know, let's have them coordinate the airspace and get the emergency aircraft on the ground. Okay? Thanks.
Can we just get the explanation pinned to every video before everyone gives out about it.
I think it’s funny everyone gets so uptight about the time vs volume thing for fuel left. Literally no one else cares.
@@saxmanb777who’s “getting uptight about it?”
Female pilot’s enunciation is excellent.
Soooo many pilots/ co pilots and ATC raddle off information in seemingly unrecognizable speech.
I realize they repeat information over and over and over thousands of times but damn.
Her speech legibility is outstanding.
This woman was a surprise and really good. An American that uses MAYDAY-MAYDAY-MAYDAY.
She was one cool cucumber.
Don't know if the woman on the flight deck was the captain or FO, either way, she did an outstanding job on the radio with ATC.
If I were in an emergency, I would want her as my pilot.
Sorry, you will have to go on your own if doesn't say occupied.
Oh and the cross wind landing too, I think in the direction that compounds with the effects of the engine failure as well. Nicely done by those pilots
I love these videos. Have worked in many workplaces in my life and it's amusing how even the smallest of glitches can get folks panicking and running around screaming like idiots. Having been an industrial first aid attendant I appreciate how rigorous training prepares one to remain calm and focused on the job at hand when things go sideways. Trust your skills, communicate and when the emergency (and the inevitable paperwork) is done with, then you can let your legs turn to jelly. I would never compare my experience with that of of pilots or ATC, but the principle is the same. Learn, train, practice so you're ready when something happens.
"infants or hazmat"? well.. sometimes infants are worse than hazmat(biohazard)... I did not know that infants can have explosive diarrhea until I was on a TPAC flight. two hours into the flight, we had to turn around because of it. The flight was 100% full in all classes, so there was no place to reseat the two row that were affected(6 or 8 passengers) Fortunately, I was about 5 rows behinds them. After we landed, it caused almost 7 hours of delay. (a new crew had to be brought in)
@solomongrundy145 it's been over 40 years since I changed a diaper, so I was quite surprised. :)
i actually saw the flight on flightradar.. it was #1 tracked with squawk 7700 too
Former PATCO controller ….brings back the memories….good job🇺🇸
Calm professional crew and ATC.
Hi anderia didn't realize you guys had this same issue last week's what's needs to be done test on them you get brand new test drives or checks out before putting them to use 😢
Your keyboard layout seems to have slipped a bit on that title
Smart move by making them land on a Takeoff runway instead of the landing runway 26R
How often does this happen? Isn’t that something maintenance should be looking at frequently?
it doesnt happen often, it could been on the take off roll where they basically full throttle the engines and that one let go
This is a Boeing product, lets all be happy the engine only went out, and didnt fall off of the plane.....
False, the engine that failed is a CFMI design
@@Blank00 And your point is??
@@rvierra7235 This incident is not Boeing’s fault.
Good point. Boeing planes of today absolutely SUCK. If you have to fly in a Boeing plane, wear a parachute.
@Blank00 Boeing of today is a substandard product. If you dont understand that, then please do your homework prior to commenting.
I don’t get why the atc data link can’t be used to request fuel and passengers instead of having to ask pilots. I get the reason but geez, if a planes going down, atc asks if they want sugar with their tea!
Excuse my ignorance here, but why do I routinely see clearances for runways labeled "L" or "R", but the aircrafts land on the opposing side? (IOW, why are runways labeled incorrectly?).
They are not labelled "incorrectly"...the number is based on the runway's compass heading (rounded to the nearest 10 degrees and the last number truncated) and the Left and Right is always just literally how 2 parallel runways are labelled from the perspective of the approaching plane. SO, the same runway will have 2 different names depending on what direction the plane is landing (or taking off) on. As an example, the runway in this video, 26R is called 8L when coming from the other direction.
Bravo!
You know, i have watched a lot of your videos, why at the beginning of the video, where it has like a letter "R" and real atc like a movie rating, why is the "R" like half outside the box? Is it by design? My ocd screams everytime
Seems that if the pilot gives fuel in time ATC asks for in weight and if the pilot gives fuel in weight then ATC wants it in time.
If you blame Boeing for this, then you will have to blame Airbus for QF33, AF66, groundings of A320NEO and A220 planes caused by PW issues, the bankruptcy of GoFirst caused by PW issues, and last November’s China Eastern A330 incident
I'm like everyone else in believing that female pilot is OUTSTANDING!!!
why is it always delta?
Guessing the female pilot was the Captain. Controls and ATC to the Captain; FO to the checklist, and then for landing Captain PF, FO Pilot monitoring?
Yo what is that Russian in the title? 😭
Nothing, it’s just a keyboard in the wrong layout.
If you use the letters in the same position between Russian and English keyboard layouts, it's "Climb-out".
She is frosty !
Absolutely not lower - I liked that . Stand by please --…--
Pics please!
Any word on where the lost engine landed?
Lost an engine means it stopped working, not that it fell off the plane.
4:27 I had to Google "Angulate"... lolz
atc didn't check which engine was out before deciding which way they should turn.
It's not a big deal in a jet. It is a bigger deal in a light prop twin.
ATC clearly asked which engine was out - it was the right one according to pilots. Pilots didn't seem to have a problem with their exit off the runway, more if their brakes were overheating.
The engine landed on DONNIE DARKO's house
Boeing has a problem and I don't want any part in it. One plane loses an engine the day after delivery from Boeing, another loses all stab trim control within 40hrs total after delivery, another returns after windshield cracks at cruising altituded, engine fires, contained and uncontained engine failures, loose bolts, missing bolts and a door plug blowout at 16,000'. After all that, the CEO of Boeing leaves his comfy home on the east coast for a rare visit to Renton to bs about safety. Not getting on any Boeing until heads roll including its CEO.
Engine issues are not Boeing’s fault. If Boeing is to blame for that kind of issue, then Airbus must be to blame for the China Eastern A330 incident last November. Also, Airbus has had their share of cracked windshields so if Boeing is to blame for that, then so must Airbus.
Blaming Boeing for windshield cracks and engine issues is like blaming Airbus for Sichuan Airlines flight 8633 or Qantas flight 32
@@EuropeanRailfanAlt add to that it’s also like blaming Airbus for last November’s China Eastern A330 incident
😎😎
Doesn't sound like a mayday....
RUclipsrs are jumping on the Boeing 'bandwagon' now to increase their subscribers--!!!!!!!!!!
IGNORE THEM ALL.
BoeingBot? 🤔
That pilot doesn’t give me much confidence in what’s flying these things. This isn’t a joke she sounded happy
And if she was sounding stressed or hysterical you’d be complaining about that instead.
She sounds a little too enthusiastic to go back to Atlanta. Does she have a good time waiting for her like some beer some booze and some romper room?
And if she was sounding stressed or hysterical you’d be complaining about that instead.