This is the best explanation I've come up with. A sports car can be a muscle car, but a muscle car can't be a sports car. Just like how a track car can be a show car, but a show car can't be a track car...or how a square can technically be defined as a rectangle, but a rectangle can't be a square. Once you understand that concept, you'll also understand why it's confusing.
@@OfficialCamaroMac No I own a Challenger right now. I had a Camaro SS 2 years ago. I drove my buddies Mustang. The only downside to the Mustang is the lack of torque.
Chargers are sedans. They have 4 doors. Chargers are no different than a trackhawk. Cars that get slapped with a V8 or supercharger. True sports cars or muscle cars have 2 doors as did the old school muscle cars. Challengers ARE too big they weigh more than mustangs and Camaros. The camaro is over all the better buy in value and the experience. The mustang looses more value than a camaro. Look online there are WAY more mustangs out for sale than their are camaros.
your point is not relevant there is indeed more mustang, but definitly not because the are bad or what ever you're implying, go look up at the sales of mustangs and camaros, and you will understand why there is a shit ton of mustang out there and camaro are a bit more uncommon :) and actually the shelby's 350 and 500 are actually selling higher then the msrp because of the value they have
The Challenger is the only true muscle car it has two doors and it is not designed for cornering and a road course a muscle car is focused on quarter mile time a sports car is more design for performance around corners and handling the horsepower is secondary not primary like a muscle car
Nobody brings a challenger to a road course.!? They only drag them and thats what a muscle car is. Mustangs and Camaros or more designed for track road courses. There more of a sports car
A camaro and mustang are designed for the track. The challenger is designed for the drag strip. Therefore that's how you get the two categories based on what they are designed for. That's how I'm seeing his explanation. I built my 5gen ZL1 for the drag strip. 958 whp and 846 torgue. It depends on the individuals soul purpose on how they build and drive their ride? ✌
@@OfficialCamaroMac I replaced my supercharger with a Magnuson 2650, 9.55 lower pulley, ported heads, E85, BTR stage 3 cam. 2" headers, 3" cat back with Corsa exhaust. Monster S triple disk, 5" big mouth intake, MM catch can and cooling mods with all of the other little mods to support the engine. It's at 16 lbs of boost with the 90 mm upper pulley at 7,000 rpm. I am going to replace my upper pulley with a 80mm and my drive shaft with a solid carbon fiber shaft from QA1. It should crack a 1,000 to the rwhp with about 18 to 19 lbs of boost? ✌
Corvette was never considered a muscle car. It’s a Sports car…period. The Stang and maro rides that line between muscle and sport. That’s why he’s doing these 3, plus they compete in the exact same market. I’m a Camaro owner myself.
Have you seen how bad a Camaro gets gapped when it races a Mustang 🐎??? Ford's super car has a pickup truck engine in it and it gaps anything GM has ever built 😂
"Cars guys" talking about muscle cars with automatic transmissions... *puke* - 11:00 Of course the transmissions are tuned differently... They have different engines with different characteristic and power bands.... The 5.0 likes to be revved out and makes more power at a higher RPM, so of course it would hold the gears longer than the Camaro. The Camaro is a 6.2L making more power down low. I feel like neither of these people have any idea what they're talking about. They're definitely NOT the same car aside from the transmission.
![Darren Waller - Who Knew (Her Perspective) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GytDjB8u6bM/mqdefault.jpg)
This is the best explanation I've come up with. A sports car can be a muscle car, but a muscle car can't be a sports car. Just like how a track car can be a show car, but a show car can't be a track car...or how a square can technically be defined as a rectangle, but a rectangle can't be a square. Once you understand that concept, you'll also understand why it's confusing.
Best Performance/Budget would be Camaro LT1 or any trim.
Best Cruiser = Challenger/Charger
Mustang is the best all around.
You have a mustang?
@@OfficialCamaroMac No I own a Challenger right now. I had a Camaro SS 2 years ago. I drove my buddies Mustang. The only downside to the Mustang is the lack of torque.
Styling: Camaro
Practicality: Charger
Fun: all of em
Chassis: Camaro
Aftermarket: Mustang
Fuel type and economy: doesn’t matter
Ford makes you Gay men (GM) Bois swallow your bowtie 😂
Get the fuck out of here with your opinion. Ford>gm
Capability: mustang
best out of the box: camaro
most practical: charger
Yo first video I seen on your channel and I’m vibin with your channel heavy keep up the work bro you’ll blow up sooner or later
Preciate you G💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾 much luv
The mustang 5.0 is the most impressive an most capable muscle car out there especially with a 10 speed they are waxing hellcats
But a mustang cannot beat Ferraris and Lamborghinis in track time like ZL1LE CAMARO does to look it up
@DouglasWilford-ls1pf im shure the GT350 puts down some good times
@@DouglasWilford-ls1pfthe mustang gtd will be able to keep up
Mustang and camero is not a muscle car its a sport car
Chargers are sedans. They have 4 doors. Chargers are no different than a trackhawk. Cars that get slapped with a V8 or supercharger. True sports cars or muscle cars have 2 doors as did the old school muscle cars. Challengers ARE too big they weigh more than mustangs and Camaros.
The camaro is over all the better buy in value and the experience. The mustang looses more value than a camaro. Look online there are WAY more mustangs out for sale than their are camaros.
your point is not relevant there is indeed more mustang, but definitly not because the are bad or what ever you're implying, go look up at the sales of mustangs and camaros, and you will understand why there is a shit ton of mustang out there and camaro are a bit more uncommon :) and actually the shelby's 350 and 500 are actually selling higher then the msrp because of the value they have
Bc the challenger is a muscle car that's why it's heavy...its a true muscle car
The Challenger is the only true muscle car it has two doors and it is not designed for cornering and a road course a muscle car is focused on quarter mile time a sports car is more design for performance around corners and handling the horsepower is secondary not primary like a muscle car
Nobody brings a challenger to a road course.!? They only drag them and thats what a muscle car is. Mustangs and Camaros or more designed for track road courses. There more of a sports car
Finally somebody no wat they talking about....these dudes do not no nothing bout cars
The Challenger is a muscle car, the Charger is a muscle car sedan. Modern Mustangs and Camaros are sports cars.
My boy said camaros have an ls motor.!! 🤣 got rid of that in 2015
2 of them are sports car 1 is muscle car so there a difference in all of them
Challenger all the way it’s the true meaning of a muscle car and it’s faster down the strip
Mustang 100 %
He meant too big like the weight 😂
A camaro and mustang are designed for the track. The challenger is designed for the drag strip. Therefore that's how you get the two categories based on what they are designed for. That's how I'm seeing his explanation. I built my 5gen ZL1 for the drag strip. 958 whp and 846 torgue. It depends on the individuals soul purpose on how they build and drive their ride? ✌
List your mods G. 💪🏾💪🏾
@@OfficialCamaroMac I replaced my supercharger with a Magnuson 2650, 9.55 lower pulley, ported heads, E85, BTR stage 3 cam. 2" headers, 3" cat back with Corsa exhaust. Monster S triple disk, 5" big mouth intake, MM catch can and cooling mods with all of the other little mods to support the engine. It's at 16 lbs of boost with the 90 mm upper pulley at 7,000 rpm. I am going to replace my upper pulley with a 80mm and my drive shaft with a solid carbon fiber shaft from QA1. It should crack a 1,000 to the rwhp with about 18 to 19 lbs of boost? ✌
Trim for trim mustangs are superior
No Chrysler 300??
That’s what I’m saying but I put them in the category of the charger they are the same car just one is luxury
4 door and less popular then the charger
Challenger is the only true muscle car listed
Wtf does this dude do to afford all these cars like that.. Its hard to believe he came out on top on every trade. Idk.. js
Me n him sold that powder
Missing one american sport car Corvette
Corvette was never considered a muscle car. It’s a Sports car…period. The Stang and maro rides that line between muscle and sport. That’s why he’s doing these 3, plus they compete in the exact same market. I’m a Camaro owner myself.
@@lbb-ridge482truuueee.
@@lbb-ridge482really ?
@@ZRIEST Yes... And people who know cars know this is true.
Camaro is better champ 🎉
U ain lie
Have you seen how bad a Camaro gets gapped when it races a Mustang 🐎???
Ford's super car has a pickup truck engine in it and it gaps anything GM has ever built 😂
"Cars guys" talking about muscle cars with automatic transmissions... *puke* - 11:00 Of course the transmissions are tuned differently... They have different engines with different characteristic and power bands.... The 5.0 likes to be revved out and makes more power at a higher RPM, so of course it would hold the gears longer than the Camaro. The Camaro is a 6.2L making more power down low. I feel like neither of these people have any idea what they're talking about. They're definitely NOT the same car aside from the transmission.
Mustang all the way
Mustang 100 %