Deduction of execution errors is relative. If you want to utilise the very high standards for minimal or negligible error for 1 gymnast, then you must apply it to all other gymnasts. If you do so, then all the other gymnasts will have much more deductions than the ones given to them.
My point is clear - "Deduction of execution errors is relative. If you want to utilise the very high standards for minimal or negligible error for 1 gymnast, then you must apply it to all other gymnasts. If you do so, then all the other gymnasts will have much more deductions than the ones given to them." In other words , you will find many more deductions for almost every other gymnast's performance than the deductions accorded to their performance.
@@finnhall9478 nah not any more, any pause is at least 0.1, 1 second pause is 0.3 and I think anything above 2 or 3 seconds is 0.5 and non recognition. It's a bit ridiculous
It’s not “Zau” bro, it’s more like “Jou” pronounced with a closed “O” instead of open. I never understood why RUclipsrs don’t bother googling the pronunciation of the person the whole video is about like it takes 1 minute.
You can't explicitly receive a deduction for flexing feet so stop sharing any fake information like a deduction of 0.1, there's nowhere in the code where it mentions any 0.1 deduction for flexing feet
![CRAZY GYMNASTICS COMPILATION #0021 [PARALLEL BARS ROUTINES EDITION] | Gymnastics International](/img/1.gif)
Almost perfect routine for Zou Jingyuan!
That's so insanely clean.
i'm honestly not sure the the tokyo judges were seeing to it a 9.3 e-score.
Thanks for posting. Uncommonly cool.🙂
They missed the .1 for bent arm on diamidov, .1 crossed legs on dismount. 😱😝🤪🤣👍👍🇺🇸
Deduction of execution errors is relative. If you want to utilise the very high standards for minimal or negligible error for 1 gymnast, then you must apply it to all other gymnasts. If you do so, then all the other gymnasts will have much more deductions than the ones given to them.
@@francisloh6110 Yes, ... so your point is?! 😱😁🤪👍👍🇺🇸
My point is clear - "Deduction of execution errors is relative. If you want to utilise the very high standards for minimal or negligible error for 1 gymnast, then you must apply it to all other gymnasts. If you do so, then all the other gymnasts will have much more deductions than the ones given to them." In other words , you will find many more deductions for almost every other gymnast's performance than the deductions accorded to their performance.
@@francisloh6110 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
The pauses he does during Tsolakidis and Makuts account for .2 deductions
incorrect you can do a one second pause on the makutz and tsolakidis and get no deductions
@@finnhall9478 nah not any more, any pause is at least 0.1, 1 second pause is 0.3 and I think anything above 2 or 3 seconds is 0.5 and non recognition. It's a bit ridiculous
But it’s harder with the pauses like he does.
@@finnhall9478no you can't go read the CoP
@@euanmclellan80352 seconds or more results in -0.5 E-Jury and NR
It’s not “Zau” bro, it’s more like “Jou” pronounced with a closed “O” instead of open. I never understood why RUclipsrs don’t bother googling the pronunciation of the person the whole video is about like it takes 1 minute.
Why he looks so sad damn
He was sad becasue he thinks his mistake costed China's team gold. Not really his fault, but I gues he was still blaming himself.
You can't explicitly receive a deduction for flexing feet so stop sharing any fake information like a deduction of 0.1, there's nowhere in the code where it mentions any 0.1 deduction for flexing feet
There’s definitely a deduction for not pointing toes?
where in the code?@@brucemurray13
@@brucemurray13yes,,, it’s called an aesthetic error. It covers anything that looks ugly and not in a pleasant line.
Well, you're not a real judge. Or you shouldn't be. That's for sure.
u 2😅
you’re not my real mom and you never will be