M20 Comparisons

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
  • In this video, Mark Pilkington of Skywagons.com covers the main differences between Mooney M20 series aircraft. It is not all encompassing, but should give enough information for viewers to identify the different Mooney's when seen on the ramp.

Комментарии • 51

  • @RoyalAviatorRepo
    @RoyalAviatorRepo 8 месяцев назад +2

    This video was very informative and a great representation of the Mooney.I just recently purchased a Mooney M20J and absolutely love it. I started a RUclips channel where I fly my Mooney cross-country to repossess vehicles.

  • @mooney-m18x
    @mooney-m18x Год назад +4

    The push/pull rods and the short aileron throw spoil Mooney pilots such that no other aircraft compares with "the feel factor". A true "Sport Aircraft" sensation. One of the most beautiful general aviation aircraft ever manufactured.

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  Год назад +1

      Mooney are great.

    • @mooney-m18x
      @mooney-m18x Год назад

      @@skywagonuniversity5023 The shortest Mooney (M18 Mite) is equally responsive and has "stick" control. I'd like to SQUEEZE you into mine for a flight review but logistics would make it difficult (located in Canada).

  • @markjessurun1294
    @markjessurun1294 3 года назад +9

    Very well Explained Sir !! Not everybody knows everything about Airplanes so to me as an Airplane enthusiast I appreciate this !!

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  3 года назад +2

      Thank you.

    • @christopheremanuel5063
      @christopheremanuel5063 3 года назад

      A trick : watch series at Flixzone. Me and my gf have been using it for watching a lot of movies these days.

    • @jeremymilan113
      @jeremymilan113 3 года назад

      @Christopher Emanuel yea, been using Flixzone} for since november myself :)

  • @markseifried3959
    @markseifried3959 4 месяца назад +1

    Thanks for the great video and wow, that's a beautiful airport.

  • @a.l.8068
    @a.l.8068 2 года назад +2

    Is it true that the long body rear seat legroom is equivalent to the mid body? I have heard the added length of the long body is all in the baggage area and doesn't increase the legroom at all.

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  2 года назад +4

      Yes, the long Mooney's have a huge baggage area no more rear legroom than a mid length Mooney.

  • @mikedial7870
    @mikedial7870 3 года назад +3

    You forgot to mention the B and A models i
    when referring to the short version.

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  3 года назад +3

      We didn't have an A or B model to demo, so we left them off. There are only 63 A models and 99 B models registered in the US. Of those, we have no idea how many still fly.

    • @kenjohnson6137
      @kenjohnson6137 2 года назад

      @@skywagonuniversity5023 Sure like to see a comparison between the G and F models. I think the G is an overlooked as a great bargain.

  • @crazypilot4017
    @crazypilot4017 Год назад +1

    Nice 👍

  • @ratherbefishing4225
    @ratherbefishing4225 3 года назад +4

    I don’t know if you’ve flown all three lengths much but do you have any information as to how they handle compared to one another? With the wingspan staying constant I would almost think the longer they are the more stable they might be in terms of yaw

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  3 года назад +7

      That is very true and observant. Same wingspan and longer and longer equals more stability especially in pitch. Landing the TLS Bravo is very sedate indeed because the elevator is about three feet further away. Also, the longer mooneys do not wobble and yaw so much in turbulence. Good point.

  • @MikeBrown-ex9nh
    @MikeBrown-ex9nh 2 года назад +1

    Maybe you could explain why they put the tails on backwards. I have never understood that.

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  2 года назад +2

      The theory is that the vertical leading edge of the tail reaches forward into the airflow to recover from a spin sooner

  • @Grantly420
    @Grantly420 2 года назад +4

    Surprisingly little information in this video.

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  2 года назад +4

      Really?
      Where else have you seen all three Mooney fuselage options in one place? The "information" is about the differences between them without going into the theory of relativity and creating confusion.

    • @Piperdakotapilot
      @Piperdakotapilot Год назад

      Thank you for the video. Great to see all 3 sizes!

  • @corbandallas8644
    @corbandallas8644 3 года назад +1

    Thanks!! Great video!!

  • @LazarusMastiffs
    @LazarusMastiffs 2 года назад +4

    Would be nice to know seating and cargo capacity. Kinda important to know on a plane...

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  2 года назад +1

      They are all four seaters. The E and J have about 1000 Lb useful loads and the Bravo is about 1200 lbs.

  • @OmarKnowCars
    @OmarKnowCars 8 месяцев назад

    Big fan of your channel here.
    Im considering a 201 Mooney. Never flown one but the numbers seem right. Any advice? Also, given the fact that Mooney manufacturer no longer in Business, will I be able to get spare parts?

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  8 месяцев назад +2

      The 201 is the best of the old small Mooneys and the best of the new big engined Mooneys all in one. All parts are available. Lycoming engine, McCauley or Hartzell prop. Huge aftermarket support. Remember Cessna stopped making singles in 1986 for 10 years with no plans to restart. All the other companies have been in an d out of bankruptcy too. Get a 201. An MSE 1987 to 1997 if you can afford it. (Rounded windows)

    • @OmarKnowCars
      @OmarKnowCars 8 месяцев назад

      @@skywagonuniversity5023many thanks ❤

  • @stephenqueen7686
    @stephenqueen7686 4 дня назад +1

    Dang you got three.can i have one.cmon man please hahaha

  • @streptokokke1003
    @streptokokke1003 2 года назад +1

    1:16 The next step up in Length from the C is the J, which is as long as the F and G? So the next step up from the C is the F...

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  2 года назад +1

      What it actually is, is the C stretched is a G with 50 gallons and 180 HP. If you stretch an E, you get an F with 200 HP, injected and 65 gallons. The F and the G are the same length as a J (or 201) The J is a factory lopresti assisted aerodynamically more efficient F. The K is a Turbo J with a Continental six in it. So the shorts are the C and E. Mediums are G, F, J and K and the logs bodies are the Ovations and Bravos and Acclaims etc.

    • @streptokokke1003
      @streptokokke1003 2 года назад

      ​@@skywagonuniversity5023 I know. I own a F. I wanted to point out, that the next step up in length from a C is NOT a J.

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  2 года назад

      @@streptokokke1003 I did not say that a J is the next step up in engine spec or performance from a C. A J however IS the next step up from a C in length. A F also is the same length, a G is also the same length, a K is also the same length. They all have a 9 inch stretch in the area of the rear passengers feet. I have owned them all.

  • @Dont_Think_Do_Films
    @Dont_Think_Do_Films 3 года назад +8

    How did you get those on a road

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  3 года назад +11

      I could come up with a cunning story about short field landings but the truth of it is that it is just a scenic access road to the East end hangars that have never been built. The runway is out of sight on the top of that bank. Up the road to the top, hang a right and you are on the runway.

    • @Dont_Think_Do_Films
      @Dont_Think_Do_Films 3 года назад +1

      @@skywagonuniversity5023 that’s pretty cool

  • @adrianrubi5012
    @adrianrubi5012 Год назад +1

    Are Mooney back for good?

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  Год назад +2

      You never know. Just like a lot of aircraft manufacturers, they open and close and change hands. This is about the 6th time for Mooney in their history.

  • @ronboe6325
    @ronboe6325 2 года назад +2

    And not a bad looking plane in the lot.

  • @wayneschenk5512
    @wayneschenk5512 Год назад +1

    One for every mission .

    • @skywagonuniversity5023
      @skywagonuniversity5023  Год назад +2

      Indeed! And, it looks like Mooney is going back into production after a short hibernation.

  • @jsteiger2228
    @jsteiger2228 2 года назад +2

    Mooney - So fast, you won't notice how uncomfortable it is!!

  • @akossiivi8136
    @akossiivi8136 2 года назад +1

    Like boats with wings