Fabulous performance of The Poltergeist! The swing is excellent, the raucousness so fun! Elegant handling of Dream Shadows despite the fistfulls of challenging chords! Way to go.
I've been playing Ghost Rag 1 and 3 for years....(*2 still eludes my fingering.) but they keep changing in the phrasing and the swing or Slow drag....I absolutely adore the Bolcom rags....LOVE>...and Respect.
Beautiful! The perfect tempo and dynamics. Most performances turn the rhythm into a burlesque, which I think neither Bolcom nor Scott Joplin countenanced. A gentle syncopation is more elegant, and far more beguiling, than cleavage plunging in a Mississippi meander down a red-light alley of N'awlins.
@@ciararespect4296 Butlesque in the broadest sense of self-caricature--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burlesque I think ragtime went through a cutsie stage after Joplin died, with white performers going beyond syncopation by adding a swing rhythm, as if all music by African-American musicians had to sound jazzy. But I don't think Scott Joplin ever intended a pause, then strong accent, on the off-beat--it detracts from the guileless sincerity of ragtime, I feel.
Paul Jacobs did this piece (in particular) with such longing and beauty that believed I would never hear them again in the same way. You have cracked that egg, Mr. LeDeur. Your performance has all the style with a teensy bit less sentimentality (a good thing in the right hands). I also heard chord voicings that I have not heard before. The quickening of the tempo in the second section ala Andante evokes a ramble along sidewalk cafes. The recap is perfect and slows the tempo and stretches...and the final section. perfection. I confess that Jacob's tempo is slower and on the right day and time I might prefer it slower. But wow: bravo!! Consummate musicianship. The last few notes seem to reference Crumb', don't they? ;-)
Sound is a little muffled, but that may just be the acoustics of the room you're in. The playing is very nice; you clearly understand these pieces, and it's rare to hear all three done together. Thank you.
I watched some youtubes of William Bolcom's friend, the fine composer C. Curtis Smith playing his own music and he used the score. I'll never feel shy about doing that again. I'd rather have the composer's instructions sitting right in front of me instead of relying on my memory of what those were. The results prove the wisdom of doing what you feel best.
Love your interpretation. Haven't found any recordings of "Dream Shadows" apart from the John Murphy complete Bolcom rags discs, and he takes too many liberties with the time IMO.
Ian Walker Thanks so much Ian- Dream shadows is a bit elusive, I suppose it's true to it's title that way. Paul Jacobs called it a 'white telephone rag" which I love!
My Friend. That is the whole point. Er...? The very name is RAG TIME...ie. taking liberties with the time or 'ragging the time.' That's what Rag means! It's not a matter of opinion...It's the definition of the genre. This guy is an astounding pianist but is certainly not playing Rag-time nor anything like it. You may well like it..I love it but Rag Time it is not. It's very difficult to have a foot in classical playing and in jazz or semi-jazz. Some do pull it off. His sensitivity is more applicable to Chopin or Debussy. Scott Joplin he is not. Too pretty. Too co-ordinated. Too dependant on classical interpretations. Not rhythmic. Too Colla Voce.. in fact, too damned polite but astounding technique.
Do not confuse "ragging" with rubato. The former means to syncopate the tune over a steady pulse accompaniment. Ragtime is, first and foremost, a genre of popular dance and march music. These contemporary pieces by Bolcom are not therefore rags in the purest sense, but rather salon pieces which skillfully employ and expand upon the rhythmic and harmonic mannerisms of ragtime and early jazz piano. The rubato is indicated frequently in his scores, something rarely (if ever) indicated in the canon of Classic Ragtime.
First, many thanks to you for playing these delightful rags and sharing them on RUclips! You are a natural talent and play with great musicality and sensitivity! Your performance of "Poltergeist" is amazing! Unlike ages 5 to 14, I am unable to memorize music now. I'm not your teacher so I won't say much more, EXCEPT, I think your playing of the first and third rags would be more consistent and effective if you practiced "the notes" so much that you COULD play them by memory! There is NO DOUBT as to your sensitive musicality. I just hypothesize you might be freed up from reading the notes, thus being able to listen and THINK about where you are and where you want to go, i.e. dynamics and overall arc of the pieces. YOU HAVE GOT THE SENSITIVITY AND MUSICALITY GALORE. YOU ARE A NATURAL TALENT. Whew! I just want to make sure you do not feel criticized. Also, I bet you are a great sight-reader, yes? The audio is good, but I am unable to discern if you are playing with a collapsed pinkie? I'll be enjoying this performance often -- always a thumbs-up from me!
Seriously! If you haven't internalized these pieces well enough to play them by memory then you shouldn't be performing them in public for a paid audience.
I still think this sentiment is rediculous, the whole memorising sheet music stunt was only popularised by Liszt (and a few other of course around that time period) as a sort of "stunt". I think performers should just be able to do whatever they're comfortable with as we all have our strengths and weaknesses !
You don't get a chance to hear this terrific music very often. Thanks.
This is my favorite interpretation I've ever heard of all three played together.
Thanks so much- delighted that you enjoyed!
Fabulous performance of The Poltergeist! The swing is excellent, the raucousness so fun! Elegant handling of Dream Shadows despite the fistfulls of challenging chords! Way to go.
This makes my heart sing and my fingers dance. So lovely. Thank you!
One of my all time favorite rags. Beautiful Jeff!
***** Thanks Owen, aren't they wonderful?
Same, I remember the first time I heard Graceful Ghost for the first time I shed a tear!
I've been playing Ghost Rag 1 and 3 for years....(*2 still eludes my fingering.) but they keep changing in the phrasing and the swing or Slow drag....I absolutely adore the Bolcom rags....LOVE>...and Respect.
i met mr. bolcom at a party in ann arbor some years ago. asked him to play the graceful ghost. he politely declined.
raymond good Darn!
Wow!
이게 우아한 유령이죠~ 슬픈느낌보다는, 발없는 유령들과 슬픔의 그 중간지점을 표현하는게 볼컴이 이 곡을 낸 방향인거 같은데 아직 완전히 수준급으로 올라서지 않으신 분들은, 비극적인 느낌을 너무 실어서 연주하는 듯. 이분이 제가 들은 분중에 곡 표현이 훌륭하시네요.
저도 애매하게 리듬감 있게 느낌 낸 것보다는 이 연주가 훨 좋은 것 같아요
Beautiful! The perfect tempo and dynamics. Most performances turn the rhythm into a burlesque, which I think neither Bolcom nor Scott Joplin countenanced.
A gentle syncopation is more elegant, and far more beguiling, than cleavage plunging in a Mississippi meander down a red-light alley of N'awlins.
Burlesque?? What are you talking about 😂
@@ciararespect4296 Butlesque in the broadest sense of self-caricature--en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burlesque
I think ragtime went through a cutsie stage after Joplin died, with white performers going beyond syncopation by adding a swing rhythm, as if all music by African-American musicians had to sound jazzy. But I don't think Scott Joplin ever intended a pause, then strong accent, on the off-beat--it detracts from the guileless sincerity of ragtime, I feel.
This is a really beautiful performance, they're best when played together and you played them wonderfully well.
Thank you, delighted you enjoyed it!
Paul Jacobs did this piece (in particular) with such longing and beauty that believed I would never hear them again in the same way. You have cracked that egg, Mr. LeDeur. Your performance has all the style with a teensy bit less sentimentality (a good thing in the right hands). I also heard chord voicings that I have not heard before. The quickening of the tempo in the second section ala Andante evokes a ramble along sidewalk cafes. The recap is perfect and slows the tempo and stretches...and the final section. perfection. I confess that Jacob's tempo is slower and on the right day and time I might prefer it slower. But wow: bravo!! Consummate musicianship. The last few notes seem to reference Crumb', don't they? ;-)
This is beautiful!!
Sound is a little muffled, but that may just be the acoustics of the room you're in.
The playing is very nice; you clearly understand these pieces, and it's rare to hear all three done together. Thank you.
I. Graceful Ghost
II. The Poltergeist...4.20
III. Dream Shadows...8.08
...
You should have a thousand
Subscribers
fantastic!
Sam Post Thanks for listening Sam!
Very nice....(*and glad to see there's someone else that uses the music.>) Love W.Bolcom.
Herbie James Thanks Herbie, no shame in using the score when needed!
I watched some youtubes of William Bolcom's friend, the fine composer C. Curtis Smith playing his own music and he used the score. I'll never feel shy about doing that again. I'd rather have the composer's instructions sitting right in front of me instead of relying on my memory of what those were. The results prove the wisdom of doing what you feel best.
Best pianist in the world
Really ? 🤔
sublime )))
Well played! Difficult rags they are! Any chance we might see The garden of Eden Rags by Bolcom played by you someday?
👍
Love your interpretation. Haven't found any recordings of "Dream Shadows" apart from the John Murphy complete Bolcom rags discs, and he takes too many liberties with the time IMO.
Ian Walker Thanks so much Ian- Dream shadows is a bit elusive, I suppose it's true to it's title that way. Paul Jacobs called it a 'white telephone rag" which I love!
My Friend.
That is the whole point. Er...? The very name is RAG TIME...ie.
taking liberties with the time or 'ragging the time.'
That's what Rag means!
It's not a matter of opinion...It's the definition of the genre.
This guy is an astounding pianist but is certainly not playing Rag-time nor anything like it. You may well like it..I love it but Rag Time it is not.
It's very difficult to have a foot in classical playing and in jazz or semi-jazz.
Some do pull it off.
His sensitivity is more applicable to Chopin or Debussy.
Scott Joplin he is not. Too pretty. Too co-ordinated. Too dependant on classical interpretations. Not rhythmic. Too Colla Voce.. in fact, too damned polite but astounding technique.
Do not confuse "ragging" with rubato. The former means to syncopate the tune over a steady pulse accompaniment. Ragtime is, first and foremost, a genre of popular dance and march music. These contemporary pieces by Bolcom are not therefore rags in the purest sense, but rather salon pieces which skillfully employ and expand upon the rhythmic and harmonic mannerisms of ragtime and early jazz piano. The rubato is indicated frequently in his scores, something rarely (if ever) indicated in the canon of Classic Ragtime.
MooPotPie Exactly!
MauriatOttolink Have you heard the composer play these?
Both Bolcom and Paul Jacobs "swung" the rhythm, at least in the first one. This is a wonderful pianist, however. Bravo!
First, many thanks to you for playing these delightful rags and sharing them on RUclips! You are a natural talent and play with great musicality and sensitivity! Your performance of "Poltergeist" is amazing! Unlike ages 5 to 14, I am unable to memorize music now. I'm not your teacher so I won't say much more, EXCEPT, I think your playing of the first and third rags would be more consistent and effective if you practiced "the notes" so much that you COULD play them by memory! There is NO DOUBT as to your sensitive musicality. I just hypothesize you might be freed up from reading the notes, thus being able to listen and THINK about where you are and where you want to go, i.e. dynamics and overall arc of the pieces. YOU HAVE GOT THE SENSITIVITY AND MUSICALITY GALORE. YOU ARE A NATURAL TALENT. Whew! I just want to make sure you do not feel criticized. Also, I bet you are a great sight-reader, yes? The audio is good, but I am unable to discern if you are playing with a collapsed pinkie? I'll be enjoying this performance often -- always a thumbs-up from me!
Seriously! If you haven't internalized these pieces well enough to play them by memory then you shouldn't be performing them in public for a paid audience.
If you don't know the difference between "paid" and "paying," perhaps you shouldn't be posting your remarks in public.
I still think this sentiment is rediculous, the whole memorising sheet music stunt was only popularised by Liszt (and a few other of course around that time period) as a sort of "stunt". I think performers should just be able to do whatever they're comfortable with as we all have our strengths and weaknesses !