Roman Catholicism and Political Form (Carl Schmitt)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 май 2022
  • Carl Schmitt's thoughts on the Roman Catholic Church, or rather that Church as it was a hundred years ago, and European political organization. History took a different turn, but as always, Schmitt has worthwhile things to say.
    The written version of this article can be found here: theworthyhouse.com/2022/05/18...
    We strongly encourage, in these days of censorship and deplatforming, all readers to bookmark our main site:
    www.theworthyhouse.com
    and to subscribe for email notifications of new posts. The Worthy House does not solicit donations or other support, or have ads. You can subscribe for email notifications here:
    theworthyhouse.com/subscribe-...
    Video podcasts identical to YT are also available at Odysee:
    odysee.com/@TheWorthyHouse
    This and all Worthy House narrations are offered with accurate closed captions (not auto-generated).
    "If, as Carl Schmitt asserted in Political Theology, “all significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are secularized theological concepts,” what does that imply for political forms? This book, written immediately after Political Theology, addresses that question. Schmitt analyzes a political form that originated as theological but has adopted many different secular roles-the Roman Catholic Church. I have to say that Roman Catholicism and Political Form, even by Schmittian standards, is a difficult read. Nonetheless, it rewards close attention and thought, because what Schmitt says is, as all things Schmitt are, surprisingly relevant to our situation today." . . .

Комментарии • 14

  • @cynicalskeptic
    @cynicalskeptic 2 года назад +2

    Nice review Mr Haywood! My best guess is that your next book for reviewing should be Fustel de Coulanges' "Ancient city", but I would be surprised if you haven't heard of it already.

    • @CharlesHaywood
      @CharlesHaywood  2 года назад +3

      I started reading it last year. Stopped, but I may return to it!

    • @cynicalskeptic
      @cynicalskeptic 2 года назад +1

      @@CharlesHaywood well although I risk of spoiling it with this remark, I should point out that if you want to to truly understand what Orthodox Christianity in reality and on the ground actually is you won't find it in Orthodox dogmas and whatnots, but in Fustel de Coulanges' "Ancient city". I will say no more.

    • @CharlesHaywood
      @CharlesHaywood  2 года назад +1

      @@cynicalskeptic Well, that certainly ups my chances of going back to it . . . .

    • @geoff9236
      @geoff9236 2 года назад

      @@CharlesHaywood I just finished reading this book a few months ago and I am an Orthodox Christian. I think the book is great for understanding the evolution of Greece and Rome, but don't see the specific connection he is referencing?

    • @sanarr1
      @sanarr1 2 года назад

      Ancient city blew my mind. Understanding it through Heidergerrs pov. Orthodox values are just a reaction of being.

  • @aldoushuxley5953
    @aldoushuxley5953 2 года назад +1

    Can you review Peter Zeihans "the end of the world is just the beginning"?
    I am thinking about buying it, but am not sure if it is worth my time or not

  • @connorfitzpatrick622
    @connorfitzpatrick622 2 года назад +1

    Do you have a suggested reading list or maybe a top ten list?

    • @CharlesHaywood
      @CharlesHaywood  2 года назад

      No, but go to the main site and you can search by topic . . . .

  • @feanor7080
    @feanor7080 2 года назад +3

    Have you noticed the trend of young, right leaning American men joining or considering joining the Orthodox Church?

    • @CharlesHaywood
      @CharlesHaywood  2 года назад +1

      Anecdotally, yes (both from others and personally).