Legend after 3 hours in the campaign : holds Italy, Sicily, Africa and Egypt Me after 3 hours in the campaign : damn, the etruscans have taken Alalia again
@@Khanye_East_27 the etruscans arent barbarians, but yeah true. Best to send the army in cosentia and the fleet to take alalia and have the main army under libo take velathri and aruminum
i really like rome 2 but following the guides made the game not fun. seeing legend play and being flexible with his building choices according to his needs gave me a whole new perspective on how i should play the game. I dont have to follow templates.I should make it fun for me. Thanks Legend!
Man alive, the old version of the spies are sick. Only bought this around xmas last year, I love this Game. Lost about 2 years playing Rome and RTR, only just got a machine good enough to play on Ultra. Also, only just realised after watching this that having generals as politicians raise influence. Thanks man.
even tho i play in a totally different way, i always love watching your campaigns... you grab momentum, and never stop (even when you complain that "you're sitting there doing nothing". everything hangs from the leather straps holding those hastatii cuirasses... but, momentum man... thanks for sharing, excellent as usual =)
I don't know why I am rewatching this in 2018. But I think the trading is well explained, or at least easy to understand. Your resources are olives, wine, and glass. But every faction wants Iron. So if you had taken the Iron Settlement in Raeti, every faction would wanna trade with you
Always good to see Historical Total War. Really hope the next historical total war is 19th Century Victorian/Colonial on a full world map. That would be wonderful...
Cool concept but it kinda looses the total war feel y'know?. Whole world would be wonderful but i think the age of exploration/ 30 years war would be a far better choice
Try specializing provices. Industry,food,trade,culture etc, that way you can maximize the profits. Bonuses you get from certain buildings in region maximize when you have plenty of building that could actually use that bonus, f.e., 4 ports in africa, build Neptune temple to maximize income from maritime commerce. Get Vulcan in Italy to get more profit from industry. Slave trader is also excellent choice since you get bonus from industry,aswell as slave decline. You will soon enough flow in cash,allowing you to decreace taxes,therefore not needed all these public order buildings.
I find the diplomacy pretty good. If you click on your self and hover over each of the factions, you can see why they're pissed at you. I usually start with a non-aggression pact and build off of it. The more you expand, the less likely different factions will trust you. It's one reason to pay attention to the war declarations, because if you take out their enemy, you get loads of brownie points. This game and Empire will honestly teach you everything you need to know about foreign policy.
I'm pretty sure the dilemmas are not random, there are lists in the Internet of all the dilemmas and the result of each choice, and so far following those lists has never failed, so it looks like the results are indeed fixed
The diplomacy works great actually. The problem, you don't understand how diplomacy works. If you hover over factions, it tells you why they don't like you. I know, it's crazy. If you invade people that are culturally close or were allies etc chances are they're not going to do much with you.
Hi Legend! Just want to say you that two of your generals from your house are in Cisalpin gaul and doing nothing, while you have one general from other house operating in Nabbatea. Also if you allow me I want to give you an advice. You know that the best province for recruiting an army is Italy, because the provincial bonus it becames to be very fast. But If you make that these units to be more efficient that would be great. You constructed practice field which will give you more slots to recruit, but if you convert your temple from jupiter to mars and if you choose to set "bread and games" edict to that provence that will give more morale to your recruits. Not much needed for Pretorian guards, but more morale is not bad thing ;)
well, if you ask me, warhammer is among the best TW games ever created. I also think that there is very little in warhammer that is the same in rome 2. The one thing they did fk up in warhammer was the chaos mechanism. Yes, it was a great idea, but after a while, having to deal with them over and over again is a pain. And not just that, they are frickin OP in the late game. Having to deal with 5 full stacks of chosen, charriots and hellcannons is nothing to take lightly. But other than that, I am convinced it is one of the best, if not the best TW game there is. Although, to be fair, if fantasy isnt your thing, I could totally understand why one could dislike it.
Adam Schofield Attila really is just an improvement in almost all sences. More interesting narrative, more complex campaign mechanics, siege escalation etc
well sry, but i like rome 2 for its fights, here i am watching my favorite total war youtuber cuz your good. still, i just like watching armys go toe to toe with eachother, arrows flying over, sound of clashing swords. Ofcourse if that is not your thing, its your campaign. your good at map tactics and game mechanics, so i get high hopes of your skills on the battlefield. and yes battles get tedious, i understand.
Next time you want to do a super hard campaign, try a legendary fall of the samurai campaign where you go republic. It shouldn't be too hard for you, but I've had to abandon a few of mine and would appreciate it if I could see how it's done properly.
The Avenger at Ilipa If you have the Sendai faction (date) take the northern most islands and secure the rear after that push downwards by the time you have notoriety high enough you should be able to take the shogunate capitol. Where do you run into problems?
I'm currently doing a Nagaoka Campaign where I literally abandoned Echigo on turn one and made a bee-line for the Matsunume on Hokkaido (the fuck-off northern-most island with the gold colored faction). The most stressful part was taking a settlement before Echigo was lost but once that was done it became very straight-forward. You can theoretically do this with any faction, but the further away you start from Hokkaido the greater risk you have of losing the campaign before it even begins.
I get the feeling that the Attila decision of adding attrition when on roads may have been done to reflect the unreliability and danger of travelling by road due to the increased banditry and border raids after the Crisis of the Third Century. Alternatively, it may have just been done to make things harder for the player (as I doubt it affects the AI). Maybe we'll never know
The food mechanic is such bs. Not only is it annoying to micromanage at the start, it becomes totally pointless after expanding enough because of the farm settlements, as well as completely fucking over the AI in the late game because of attrition, which makes the late game even easier, so in the end it's just another thing making the early game harder and late game easier
Although i'm loving the changes you made to your channel going with having fun and the brand new 60 FPS, i'm not really enjoying this campaign for the auto-resolve fest. Try to give a couple battles :D
there's no point manually resolving battles, not when the auto resolve is so heavily in his favour and manually resolving will see a higher percentage of his army dying, purely because legendary difficulty see's AI levy spears as triarii on roids
@Jacques Bloques well put. I use mods that fix all of Rome 2's issues and then just play it on 'normal' like you say. One of the biggest issues with this game is the 'base income' that all of the factions get for free. There's a mod that removes it completely, then it's about building a real economy. Once the free income is removed I've found that another mod is needed to half the army upkeep to keep the economy in balance with the buildings return on investment.
Yes and no. A 12 TPY mod makes it so you have to end turn 12 times to pass a year instead of 4 like in vanilla. It technically extends the length of the campaign, but only because it makes you end turn 3 times as much.
Nicholas Perry I prefer Rome, attila is very poorly optimized (future proofing my ass), has shittier pathfinding and less diversity in types of factions. Also I personally prefer Rome's simpler, "dumbed down" politic system because I hate having to deal with that shit
Crap 220 BC I forgot how early I the Roman Empire this game starts, been a couple years since I played, can't wait till CA stop with the Warhammer fantasy bullshit
Something just occurred to me. Why does the Rome II campaign map seem a tad bit bigger than Attila's, despite Attila supposedly being bigger? Confuses me.
The only thing that is annoying me is the heking Hastati units only U ll need siege units nd slingers too in order to be more tactical But since u r jst auto resolving u hav no prob with dat But very clever indeed in ur strategy
Since Legend has literally explained this a thousand times already and you weren't paying attention, I'll take one for the team and explain it once again. Legend *wants* to fight the battles manually, you should check out his Rome I and Medieval 2 campaigns. The problem is that in recent total wars the ai has begun to cheat units more and more and the autoresolve has grown more and more broken. Add to this the fact that elite units are less cost effective than cheap units in recent total wars (why own one cataphract stack when you can own seven eastern spearmen stacks?) and you have a recipe for disaster. In order to compete with the unit spamming ai, Legend has to field a large number of armies himself, even if it's just to cover more territory (because you can't divide armies anymore). He could fill them up with elite units, which I think might be his endgame goal for this campaign, but right now his economy isn't strong enough to support that without going bankrupt. So now he has stacks of Hastati that are useless in manually resolved battles (especially against an ai that gets ridiculous stat buffs on higher difficulties -- I've seen Hastati lose 1v1 to Levy Freemen on Legendary) it's just easier to autoresolve. Of course, Legend could probably still win in a manually resolved battle, but why (from a *strategic* perspective, not a *"ergh mergh gerhd my subscribers want manually resolved battles!!!"* perspective) would he risk a costly battle (with almost guaranteed heavy casualties, which he could possible lose) when he could autoresolve with a *guaranteed victory* with less than 10% casualties. Ask any military commander ever which one they would pick.
Want to know how to get rid of those buffs that ai have? And so that Hastati don't lose to levy freemen in manually resolved battles? By not playing on legendary difficulty.
Well for some it’s exciting and like you, for some it is not. I’m watching this to understand more tactics and how to grow a civilization, and Legend in my opinion is the best at it
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Legend after 3 hours in the campaign : holds Italy, Sicily, Africa and Egypt
Me after 3 hours in the campaign : damn, the etruscans have taken Alalia again
Sooooooo fucking true. These barbarians are like tootache
=)))))))))))))) it s true
Can somebody share total rome 2 with me I'm a bit tight on cash
@@Khanye_East_27 the etruscans arent barbarians, but yeah true. Best to send the army in cosentia and the fleet to take alalia and have the main army under libo take velathri and aruminum
Its because spies were op back then bro…. Play the game now and it will be more difficult because they removed spy abilities in the game
I really liked how the first rome game had the other two house control their own armies and all answered to the Senate, just feels more Roman that way
"no wonder the African slave trade went so well" lmao
what time
@@ryanhudson3660 1:23:39
I’m glad I’m not the only one who caught that. Jesus. Lol
I let out an audible "ooooh"
Heard him say it, went straight to the comments, saw this right at the top lol.
I'm enjoying this new 2017 "have fun" Legend
KingNosferatu the swearing returns!
Rome takes what belongs to Rome, everyone else can get fucked
Nah Hitler could've stayed the same, they just needed a Legend of Total War as a general.
nopinkcreations I'm wondering what Germany would have done with a autocomplete battle option.
"I dont want to blitz the campaign map"
i really like rome 2 but following the guides made the game not fun. seeing legend play and being flexible with his building choices according to his needs gave me a whole new perspective on how i should play the game. I dont have to follow templates.I should make it fun for me. Thanks Legend!
30:24, that right there, I felt it, a whole new meaning to nut cracker
legend says he is still seething over the loss of a hundred senators
"Creatove Assembly, give me back my Senators !" - Legend, 9 AD
Man alive, the old version of the spies are sick. Only bought this around xmas last year, I love this Game. Lost about 2 years playing Rome and RTR, only just got a machine good enough to play on Ultra. Also, only just realised after watching this that having generals as politicians raise influence. Thanks man.
"Diplomacy is broken" - attacks Egypt.
Auto-resolve 4: This time it's personal
You make this game look easy. I've restarted like 3 roman campaigns because I keep getting overwhelmed.
You should watch my "world war" challenge you would be super impressed😂
"No wonder the African slave trade went so well." 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1:23:38
Hahahaha racism is funny
@@jawharz9759 yes
@@jawharz9759 Absolutely
This madlad might actually conquer the entire mediteranian with just Hastati.
Prety sure this is how Rome did it. Why bother with archers and cavalry when your brave infantry can steamrole every one else already.
@@florians9949in rl if you see romans are not much cavalry users
@@Alex-_2001 I have the feeling you didn’t finished your sentence because I have no clue what you are trying to say.
I have not played a computer in months SO THANK YOU LEGEND.
even tho i play in a totally different way, i always love watching your campaigns... you grab momentum, and never stop (even when you complain that "you're sitting there doing nothing". everything hangs from the leather straps holding those hastatii cuirasses... but, momentum man...
thanks for sharing, excellent as usual =)
Really enjoying this so far, but you can't try to be historically accurate while also looking for peace with Carthage. Carthago delenda est!
I can think of three periods of peace with carthage,
I don't know why I am rewatching this in 2018. But I think the trading is well explained, or at least easy to understand.
Your resources are olives, wine, and glass. But every faction wants Iron. So if you had taken the Iron Settlement in Raeti, every faction would wanna trade with you
Rome 2 is dope got this recently lot of fun
Legend:
make Rome 2 great again.
Great playthrough so far, really enjoying your expertise. You just steamroll everyone xD
After seeing this im playing ROMA sooo Wrong!!! Time to start again!!
Here in 2020, trying to get all my favorite videos in before the grand finally of the US!
The most annoying thing in the grand campaign is how fast your generals die
Always good to see Historical Total War.
Really hope the next historical total war is 19th Century Victorian/Colonial on a full world map. That would be wonderful...
Cool concept but it kinda looses the total war feel y'know?. Whole world would be wonderful but i think the age of exploration/ 30 years war would be a far better choice
Thst Guy personally want medieval 3 or Bronze Age
Damn I just wanted to go to sleep
you can sleep when youre dead!
Dang Legend, you almost are reaching Alexander the Great level conquests in this campaign! 3 settlements in 1 turn!
I'm loving this soooooooo much Legend.
Try specializing provices. Industry,food,trade,culture etc, that way you can maximize the profits. Bonuses you get from certain buildings in region maximize when you have plenty of building that could actually use that bonus, f.e., 4 ports in africa, build Neptune temple to maximize income from maritime commerce. Get Vulcan in Italy to get more profit from industry. Slave trader is also excellent choice since you get bonus from industry,aswell as slave decline. You will soon enough flow in cash,allowing you to decreace taxes,therefore not needed all these public order buildings.
Hi Legendo! Rome Total war 1 is so much better than 2, in my opinion. Greetings from Buenos Aires, Argentina :)
I find the diplomacy pretty good. If you click on your self and hover over each of the factions, you can see why they're pissed at you. I usually start with a non-aggression pact and build off of it. The more you expand, the less likely different factions will trust you. It's one reason to pay attention to the war declarations, because if you take out their enemy, you get loads of brownie points. This game and Empire will honestly teach you everything you need to know about foreign policy.
Your playstyle man its better then any other rome 2 campaign I have seen keep it up :D
I'm pretty sure the dilemmas are not random, there are lists in the Internet of all the dilemmas and the result of each choice, and so far following those lists has never failed, so it looks like the results are indeed fixed
1:09:15 Just noticed that Monty Python snippet, can't believe they put that in. XD
Uploading all these1080p 60fps 90 minute vids must be stretching your bandwidth at your end? I've been waiting all yesterday for this one ;)
CA: Let’s make a game and be ambitious Like Rome 2
CA 3 years later: Let’s make a game and be lazy like Atilla and warhamer
Like in Rome 2. And Like in Atilla And Warhammer
@@ironknights7196 atilla is an amazing game warhammer ehh ye not great but attilla is amazing not just my opinion
@@jamieokeeffe2278 I don’t like Atilla but it is my opinion
@@ironknights7196 it wasn’t made lazy
The diplomacy works great actually. The problem, you don't understand how diplomacy works. If you hover over factions, it tells you why they don't like you. I know, it's crazy. If you invade people that are culturally close or were allies etc chances are they're not going to do much with you.
I think he meant the AI’s decision making is bad
Oh yeah baby. Thumbs up everyone. Now I feel like playing Rome 2 again.
You should've joined someone's war agains Egypt
It just seems like you're rushing through this, it really makes it unenjoyable to watch
I also find it to be rushed
The worst thing about the trade in this game is how easy it is to extort everyone for massive amounts of cash.
I think that you can have multiple civil wars if your influence is too low or too high
Yes...
Hi Legend! Just want to say you that two of your generals from your house are in Cisalpin gaul and doing nothing, while you have one general from other house operating in Nabbatea. Also if you allow me I want to give you an advice. You know that the best province for recruiting an army is Italy, because the provincial bonus it becames to be very fast. But If you make that these units to be more efficient that would be great. You constructed practice field which will give you more slots to recruit, but if you convert your temple from jupiter to mars and if you choose to set "bread and games" edict to that provence that will give more morale to your recruits. Not much needed for Pretorian guards, but more morale is not bad thing ;)
well, if you ask me, warhammer is among the best TW games ever created. I also think that there is very little in warhammer that is the same in rome 2. The one thing they did fk up in warhammer was the chaos mechanism. Yes, it was a great idea, but after a while, having to deal with them over and over again is a pain. And not just that, they are frickin OP in the late game. Having to deal with 5 full stacks of chosen, charriots and hellcannons is nothing to take lightly. But other than that, I am convinced it is one of the best, if not the best TW game there is. Although, to be fair, if fantasy isnt your thing, I could totally understand why one could dislike it.
Master class
i really dont understand the hate for this game, its one of the best total wars if not the best
Adam Schofield Attila really is just an improvement in almost all sences. More interesting narrative, more complex campaign mechanics, siege escalation etc
Yes, it's the best thanks to amateur modders who fixed all the problems CA should have worked on
Aeri Creates but it has no balanced challenge system like the earlier titles did.
It's not Total War, it's Total Autoresolve. That's why people hate it.
A S you are an 12 yrs old idiot...
I love how mad he still is about losing those senators hahaha. I would be too to be honest
Does sailing down the sewer ever give you positive results?!
You get a shit holiday.
In the last episode you said “alright goodbye fuckers” right as I changed videos
Lucky you played this game back then when spies were useful idk what they thought when they removed their skills… shame on them
good stuff
So why doesn't one build up Roma?
Also whats the point of legendary if the auto resolve is the same stats as easy or hard…
well sry, but i like rome 2 for its fights, here i am watching my favorite total war youtuber cuz your good. still, i just like watching armys go toe to toe with eachother, arrows flying over, sound of clashing swords.
Ofcourse if that is not your thing, its your campaign. your good at map tactics and game mechanics, so i get high hopes of your skills on the battlefield. and yes battles get tedious, i understand.
3h am and 36min and enjoying that cool shit
Any reason for the preference for aux syrian archers over the aux cretan archers?
Next time you want to do a super hard campaign, try a legendary fall of the samurai campaign where you go republic. It shouldn't be too hard for you, but I've had to abandon a few of mine and would appreciate it if I could see how it's done properly.
The Avenger at Ilipa If you have the Sendai faction (date) take the northern most islands and secure the rear after that push downwards by the time you have notoriety high enough you should be able to take the shogunate capitol. Where do you run into problems?
I'm currently doing a Nagaoka Campaign where I literally abandoned Echigo on turn one and made a bee-line for the Matsunume on Hokkaido (the fuck-off northern-most island with the gold colored faction). The most stressful part was taking a settlement before Echigo was lost but once that was done it became very straight-forward. You can theoretically do this with any faction, but the further away you start from Hokkaido the greater risk you have of losing the campaign before it even begins.
Why the character's movement is so fast? It wasnt like this in spartan campaign.
I get the feeling that the Attila decision of adding attrition when on roads may have been done to reflect the unreliability and danger of travelling by road due to the increased banditry and border raids after the Crisis of the Third Century. Alternatively, it may have just been done to make things harder for the player (as I doubt it affects the AI). Maybe we'll never know
It was added to reflect the attrition taken in extreme conditions like desert or snow. How does taking a road really help if it's too hot or too cold?
The food mechanic is such bs. Not only is it annoying to micromanage at the start, it becomes totally pointless after expanding enough because of the farm settlements, as well as completely fucking over the AI in the late game because of attrition, which makes the late game even easier, so in the end it's just another thing making the early game harder and late game easier
Although i'm loving the changes you made to your channel going with having fun and the brand new 60 FPS, i'm not really enjoying this campaign for the auto-resolve fest. Try to give a couple battles :D
I'll auto resolve more.
there's no point manually resolving battles, not when the auto resolve is so heavily in his favour and manually resolving will see a higher percentage of his army dying, purely because legendary difficulty see's AI levy spears as triarii on roids
@Jacques Bloques well put. I use mods that fix all of Rome 2's issues and then just play it on 'normal' like you say. One of the biggest issues with this game is the 'base income' that all of the factions get for free. There's a mod that removes it completely, then it's about building a real economy. Once the free income is removed I've found that another mod is needed to half the army upkeep to keep the economy in balance with the buildings return on investment.
Loving this but wouldn't it make sense to get champions straight away?
total war noob here: why don't you build up rome? what's the reason?
If you make the Sassanid Empire a Client state in Total War Attila you also gain all of their puppets too #totalrecycle
First of all, great series. Secondly, what is your view on champions? Are you waiting until better army compositions before you recruit them?
Literally the only reason youre marching your way through is because spies were op back then play the game now and you won’t get passed anything
I like this new fornat.It's fucking cool!
i have 241289 moonies in my treasury
Spam recruiting 'hastati' is not the best option in my opinion. I always recruit some 'roarii' to take care of defensive positions and cav.
Why don’t you fight battles?
how tf does this guy get such a high income so quickly
He wouldn’t say the African slave trade went well to an African tho. And it back fired on the Americans. 😂😂😂
This dude is like the British version of Man of Low Moral Fiber (Borderlands 2 player)
I just don’t understand how income works
I have a question. Do TPY (Turns per year) mods extend the length of the campaign (the amount of turns until the campaign ends) or not?
Yes and no. A 12 TPY mod makes it so you have to end turn 12 times to pass a year instead of 4 like in vanilla. It technically extends the length of the campaign, but only because it makes you end turn 3 times as much.
(Sorry for the late answer) Thank you. That's the kind of extension I was hoping for.
You got the Roman borders wrong
Hey Legend. I'm pretty sure with agents, an "opportune failure" means they can try again? I think?
What's worse Rome 2 or Attila?
In rome you also have the easten empires, thracians and nomads
Nicholas Perry I prefer Rome, attila is very poorly optimized (future proofing my ass), has shittier pathfinding and less diversity in types of factions. Also I personally prefer Rome's simpler, "dumbed down" politic system because I hate having to deal with that shit
Rome is not a bad game in it`s current state, I find it pretty enjoyable
Crap 220 BC I forgot how early I the Roman Empire this game starts, been a couple years since I played, can't wait till CA stop with the Warhammer fantasy bullshit
His Exits Are A Little Much
man you're lucky the gauls don't attack from the north, having 95% of your forces in Africa and Asia. AI is stupid...
Something just occurred to me. Why does the Rome II campaign map seem a tad bit bigger than Attila's, despite Attila supposedly being bigger? Confuses me.
what is with the screen ? iam watching it in 1080p60 and it looks like shit
that's just rome 2 my friend.
Nicholas Jerrett i know :D i mean the video quality not the game graphics :D
I miss Rome/Medieval 2. Well not miss it, I play them all the time, I just miss that style instead of fucking Warhammer.
and what do you think of total war arena?
The only thing that is annoying me is the heking Hastati units only
U ll need siege units nd slingers too in order to be more tactical
But since u r jst auto resolving u hav no prob with dat
But very clever indeed in ur strategy
You just contradicted yourself. How can he need slingers when not having them is not a problem, and who uses slingers anyway?
what do you use to record rome 2
Come on how the fuck do you generate so much food from fucking 50 to 120 food with one settlement. How the fuck please explain it to us.
Always hearing a fuzzy noise from the microphone
He has a fan blowing on himself.
60$ for this? ARE U FUACKING KIDDING ME
You don't have to pay 60$...Only idiots pay full price for games. Stop being an idiot.
bing bing bong bong
Your earlier Rome 2 series were more interesting. This is just autoresolve spam.
wow its like rome 2 battles are fun to watch
Since Legend has literally explained this a thousand times already and you weren't paying attention, I'll take one for the team and explain it once again. Legend *wants* to fight the battles manually, you should check out his Rome I and Medieval 2 campaigns. The problem is that in recent total wars the ai has begun to cheat units more and more and the autoresolve has grown more and more broken. Add to this the fact that elite units are less cost effective than cheap units in recent total wars (why own one cataphract stack when you can own seven eastern spearmen stacks?) and you have a recipe for disaster. In order to compete with the unit spamming ai, Legend has to field a large number of armies himself, even if it's just to cover more territory (because you can't divide armies anymore). He could fill them up with elite units, which I think might be his endgame goal for this campaign, but right now his economy isn't strong enough to support that without going bankrupt. So now he has stacks of Hastati that are useless in manually resolved battles (especially against an ai that gets ridiculous stat buffs on higher difficulties -- I've seen Hastati lose 1v1 to Levy Freemen on Legendary) it's just easier to autoresolve. Of course, Legend could probably still win in a manually resolved battle, but why (from a *strategic* perspective, not a *"ergh mergh gerhd my subscribers want manually resolved battles!!!"* perspective) would he risk a costly battle (with almost guaranteed heavy casualties, which he could possible lose) when he could autoresolve with a *guaranteed victory* with less than 10% casualties. Ask any military commander ever which one they would pick.
To each their own I guess, I think the campaign map is more fun than the battles.
Want to know how to get rid of those buffs that ai have? And so that Hastati don't lose to levy freemen in manually resolved battles? By not playing on legendary difficulty.
Marcus Schultz yeah really. Would be much more fun to watch manual battle on very hard then auto resolve spam boredom on Legendary.
if you want to recreate roman borders you shouldn't take magna germania or dacia. The borders should stop at the rhine and the danube.
Agree on Magna Germania, but Trajan did conquer Dacia - that's what Trajan column is all about.
That's true but the romans abandoned it soon after. Trajan basically conquered it for prestige.
but still at the territorial hight of the Roman Empire Dacia was a roman province, Mesopotamia was also a roman provence at that point.
personally i would go for the borders defined by Hadrian but that's me :)
Well, 160 years is quite some time (From 100 ish to 260 ish if I'm not mistaken). Danube and Rhine are a more natural border, true.
why not just use 4 turns per year tho?
I'm kinda sad that all the more interesting factions are all gonna get autoed plz legend even one god battle against an eastern empire
I hate rome 2 but loved this campaign so far
How the fuck do. You make so much Money?
Legend should be a bit more considerate of the poor Libyan soldiers who have to clean up the lantries of the posioned troops
#senseofsmellmatters
can u fight some battles?
if you play like this, the game is very boring :((
Well for some it’s exciting and like you, for some it is not. I’m watching this to understand more tactics and how to grow a civilization, and Legend in my opinion is the best at it
4,045th