It looks pretty good, but it doesn't look "70 fps on the fastest GPU in the world" good. Especially the screenspace reflections are something that we really should have left in 8th gen where it made sense. Go ray-traced or for water go back to planar. SSR artifacts (gaps) are so distracting in this kind of scene with lots of clutter between the camera and the water I'd almost prefer a baked cubemap.
Oh yeah, especially at the camera edges when panning fast over the water! I absolutely HATE that!! Plus some leaves and stuff got incorrectly reflected, even though they where in front of the lake, close to the camera. This is soo annoying.
@@dangernoodle235 The "close to the camera" problem isn't close objects being reflected erroneously (although that sort of thing did use to happen in older SSR techniques), it's that there's a gap in the reflection that's the size and shape of the close object. You could think of it as closer objects casting a "reflection shadow" onto everything hidden behind them. The hidden objects can't appear in the reflection so the reflection has a gap, and the gap's shape gives away what caused it.
Couldn't help but feel like was being watched running around there at night with a torch. Was waiting for something to jump out and scare the poop out of me. Very impressive and brilliant.
I would say the big difference is, that those games like Battlefront heavily rely on normal maps to create self shadowing(so just a flat surface), whilst here all the details are from actual polygons, massive massive amounts of polygons.
@@Nelis1324 Does that matter which tech is behind the scenes? If you can do the same with low polys + textures + tricks instead of polygons with billion vertexes, I would prefer the low tech one since that would run on geforce 1060 thus will be cheaper.
@@pandatheelectronic id say low poly mesh wouldnt look good infront of high poly mesh or infront of a mesh with good displacement and nanite, high polygon mesh with nanite and well optimised in terms of verts and triangles look or create photorealistic graphics
We always give praise to the graphics engine and none to the environmental artists. Having ambiance, realistic environments and such comes down to them.
Probably just Quixel Megascans which have been integrated into Unreal Engine since UE4. Now less hardware hungry due to Lumen and Nanite. What makes this feel more realistic than other demos is not the graphic, it's the head bobbing and environmental sounds. The camp fire doesn't look too great, no flame in the world casts a constant light.
Looks great! But it kills the immersion when you float over big rocks like they are nothing. Adaotion in walking speed and perhaps avoiding bigger obatacles in your way would add big time!
I want an AC Origins remake that looks like this released SOOO badly. While also keeping the original AC origins combat with tweaks to make it feel more dynamic.
Amazing graphics, photorealism at it's highest level. But something strange happened, the more I'm being fooled by the game that I'am not seeing a game but real life world, the more I try to see each tiny inconsistencies, like duplicate models of vegetation, inconsistent sound of the water, small errors in water reflections. While in a game like Dark Forces 2, Doom 2, Quake 1, Ignition, old school games I really didn't care since the games were pure action and exploration, amazingly fun. The game must be fun with dummy models made of very simple volumes like a few cubes, sprites and spheres. I really see in the future game developers just creating a very simple world where the gameplay design, the story and some graphics art concepts is making the AI to generate all the detailed graphics, to let them grow naturally with certain randomness.
But AC Origins doesn't need a remake. It might need a remaster bc textures even in ultra are a bit low res when seen from near... But taking that apart, it really is a great looking game. Now, to talk about this engine demo, it looks great though
it's been the same for years the demos show us such nice games but in reality nothing comes out that looks like this the whole thing always reminds me of the advertisement for frozen pizza on the box the pizza looks so delicious but then after you do that thing out of the oven, the whole thing just looks lame!
The extent of an engines' visuals, and the overhead of added game mechanics has to have some tradeoff. When games can render like this without trickery, the average PCs and consoles will be much stronger. _(These kinds of showcases are on top tier for the time computers)_ Until then we have medium settings.
@@zeekjones1 the problem is that no one get the Risk to make a game tas runn onlz on hig end PC the problem is tatt a game must selling...and the most selling are wen games running on so many consoles an pc as possible so the must programming the game taht a ps4 can run it....and her we are...this is the Problem but not onlz olt console are the problem the same is potato pc taht will run the game....so its very difficult to bring the game in this quality.
Roam around in Assassin's Creed Origins Afterlife (all of them with ray tracing) in one video. That'll be a good video. Of course at 8K or 4K. Please do this ;)
The camp fire looked terrible, the actual flames looked like a flat animation that turned when the camera panned. No footprints in the sand? And the physics are way off, walking over the rocky area would make us humans slow down, side step, go up, down over the bigger rocks etc... Otherwise, the vegetation looks great but should all of the palm trees be the same height? Looked at bit unnatural at one point..?
I hope this demo is running at 4k without DLSS otherwise most people will get unplayable frame rates on any game that looks this good or is more populated with assets than this is. I doubt Ubisoft will make anything this nice they refuse to get with the picture and and stop using their shitty Anvil engine and move to the infinitely superior UE. If they do, maybe they'll finally stop having the worst character models in the industry
it looks good, but it's still no where close to real life. The water looks terribly fake, especially contrasted against the more realistic looking palm trees. It's also just a desert landscape with a bunch of palm trees copy pasted in the middle of it. It still 'feel' like a level. The fire isn't anywhere near close to real life either. Elements such as water and fire as notoriously difficult to render, regardless of these unreal engine advances. Good, but not real life by any stretch.
We will, just when things are better optimised and we start getting rid of 15 year old GPUs that cant handle a game at 720p, with the help of DLSS and FSR, a LOT of games are playable on even low spec PC's now
all of this and no footprints? lol games from 2008 had destractive ground footprints. the sounds are horrible too, his feet barely touches the tip of the water and it sounds like 10 people padel boat splashing through. the moon looks like a projector blinding all. the fire burn on two sticks and she looks like blazing tornado of molten lava. im not impressed. comeon you can do better. the wind on the sand looks cool thou, and the lights looks good too
Optimisation 0/10... Ue5 is not for everyone, guys need to learn a better wokflow please... Compare to the first trailer reveal UE5, this demo look like UE4 not 5
Does it look amazing? Yes. Does it look photo realistic? No. And it won't for decades to come. Not even movies can get CG right and a frame for a movie is rendered over several hours. So stop with this hype.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[4K60] Could Witcher 4 look like this Demo? Unreal Engine 5.0 Lumen - Medival Village](/img/1.gif)
This is real-time on consumer hardware. Amazing!
Looks very pretty but damn those sound effects were killing me.
The water splash clipping off at the end was taking me out of it.
Looks nice, love the dunes. Can't wait for the day when water detail is increased i.e ripples from ones movement expand out clash, converge etc.
unreal engine is amazing. great video!
thanks man :)
It looks pretty good, but it doesn't look "70 fps on the fastest GPU in the world" good. Especially the screenspace reflections are something that we really should have left in 8th gen where it made sense. Go ray-traced or for water go back to planar. SSR artifacts (gaps) are so distracting in this kind of scene with lots of clutter between the camera and the water I'd almost prefer a baked cubemap.
Oh yeah, especially at the camera edges when panning fast over the water!
I absolutely HATE that!!
Plus some leaves and stuff got incorrectly reflected, even though they where in front of the lake, close to the camera. This is soo annoying.
@@dangernoodle235 The "close to the camera" problem isn't close objects being reflected erroneously (although that sort of thing did use to happen in older SSR techniques), it's that there's a gap in the reflection that's the size and shape of the close object. You could think of it as closer objects casting a "reflection shadow" onto everything hidden behind them. The hidden objects can't appear in the reflection so the reflection has a gap, and the gap's shape gives away what caused it.
Couldn't help but feel like was being watched running around there at night with a torch. Was waiting for something to jump out and scare the poop out of me. Very impressive and brilliant.
It's far from real life looking, but the texture and screen space reflection's resolution is amazing.
Looks somewhat like Star Wars Battlefront. Just shows how advanced and ahead of its time DICE was
It truly was
I would say the big difference is, that those games like Battlefront heavily rely on normal maps to create self shadowing(so just a flat surface), whilst here all the details are from actual polygons, massive massive amounts of polygons.
@@Nelis1324 Does that matter which tech is behind the scenes? If you can do the same with low polys + textures + tricks instead of polygons with billion vertexes, I would prefer the low tech one since that would run on geforce 1060 thus will be cheaper.
@@pandatheelectronic but this tech significantly reduces the time required to achieve this level of quality
@@pandatheelectronic id say low poly mesh wouldnt look good infront of high poly mesh or infront of a mesh with good displacement and nanite, high polygon mesh with nanite and well optimised in terms of verts and triangles look or create photorealistic graphics
Looks amazing up until banding in the night sky. Why games still don't have debanding built in is beyond me. Thankfully there is always ReShade, etc.
This is freaking amazing, I really hope we'll be able to play games with this level of graphics in VR by 2030.
Should be no problem in 2023 - Foveated view is actually less of a strain on the system than a fullscreen clear picture
This is what mobile phone graphics will look like in 2033. I've noticed they tend to be about 10 years behind consoles.
2030?Do you realize you can just stream it trough your pc right?
Hopefully one day we will have a realistic environment for relax after work
U bet
We always give praise to the graphics engine and none to the environmental artists. Having ambiance, realistic environments and such comes down to them.
only ive noticed, that when he walks into the water, there arent any waves on the lakes surface?
Probably just Quixel Megascans which have been integrated into Unreal Engine since UE4. Now less hardware hungry due to Lumen and Nanite. What makes this feel more realistic than other demos is not the graphic, it's the head bobbing and environmental sounds. The camp fire doesn't look too great, no flame in the world casts a constant light.
Amazing visuals, samples for the sound of horrific however
It looks cool but what about physics, destruction, action, ai? It's not all about pixels and lighting
bayek need more sequels include Egypt
Trying to hide the use of screen space reflections on the water surface so hard - moving the camera only left or right
Best quality 👌 👏 🙌 💯
They used DLSS for this video? Or only RTX ON?
Stunning!
The bigass rocks refuse to load though it seems :P
What is that called when you pan the camera and there is a smearing/lightness on the water at the frame edge?
I think it's screen space reflection artifacts being motion-blurred
Looks great! But it kills the immersion when you float over big rocks like they are nothing. Adaotion in walking speed and perhaps avoiding bigger obatacles in your way would add big time!
I want an AC Origins remake that looks like this released SOOO badly. While also keeping the original AC origins combat with tweaks to make it feel more dynamic.
Alter sieht das krank aus🤩
But why does it sound like fresh snow ? xD
Amazing graphics, photorealism at it's highest level. But something strange happened, the more I'm being fooled by the game that I'am not seeing a game but real life world, the more I try to see each tiny inconsistencies, like duplicate models of vegetation, inconsistent sound of the water, small errors in water reflections. While in a game like Dark Forces 2, Doom 2, Quake 1, Ignition, old school games I really didn't care since the games were pure action and exploration, amazingly fun. The game must be fun with dummy models made of very simple volumes like a few cubes, sprites and spheres. I really see in the future game developers just creating a very simple world where the gameplay design, the story and some graphics art concepts is making the AI to generate all the detailed graphics, to let them grow naturally with certain randomness.
looking very nice, first raytracing ac then, quite exciting
But AC Origins doesn't need a remake. It might need a remaster bc textures even in ultra are a bit low res when seen from near... But taking that apart, it really is a great looking game.
Now, to talk about this engine demo, it looks great though
Is this standalone demo or need to run trough editor?
Can't you try A100?
Please can you remaster for Euro Truck Simulator 2 using this engine?
Beautiful. Should be ok in 1440p on my 4080 😊
Let me know how that goes. I'm gonna run it on mine .
@@ctrain149 in very high and quality , I have 88fps in 1440p. All max, I have 32
@@patlezinc about the same for a 4090 :)
We're watching them build the matrix, astounding!
Looks good but the palm trees are frozen or what?
Is this the real life?
Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landside,
No escape from reality
Open your eyes!
It looks good, but I was expecting way more.
Hi, can I run it without unreal engine I really wanna play this demo without unreal engine
Absolutely beautiful 👍👍
I've RTX 4090 ❤😁 and i7-12700KF@5.2GHz and I adore this demo! 😍 But how do we disable the motion blur and DoF??
This is really nice 👍
I don't believe it until I download it and run on my own system with the same setup. But it looks great :)
it's been the same for years the demos show us such nice games but in reality nothing comes out that looks like this the whole thing always reminds me of the advertisement for frozen pizza on the box the pizza looks so delicious but then after you do that thing out of the oven, the whole thing just looks lame!
The extent of an engines' visuals, and the overhead of added game mechanics has to have some tradeoff.
When games can render like this without trickery, the average PCs and consoles will be much stronger.
_(These kinds of showcases are on top tier for the time computers)_
Until then we have medium settings.
@@zeekjones1 the problem is that no one get the Risk to make a game tas runn onlz on hig end PC the problem is tatt a game must selling...and the most selling are wen games running on so many consoles an pc as possible so the must programming the game taht a ps4 can run it....and her we are...this is the Problem but not onlz olt console are the problem the same is potato pc taht will run the game....so its very difficult to bring the game in this quality.
Looks great but the trees are all the same height. You can tell especially around that lake
Nice job, but when the character stepped into the water there were no ripples.
Look at Warcraft 3 Cut scenes more than 20 years ago,they look even more realistic, Crysis 1 graphics and water animation.
Roam around in Assassin's Creed Origins Afterlife (all of them with ray tracing) in one video. That'll be a good video. Of course at 8K or 4K. Please do this ;)
We need a Stranded Deep remake in Unreal 5
Gothic 3 remake should look Like this :D
Does it have dlss ?
graphics pictures are great 😍😍😍😍😍
Dat sound beter off
Sand is snow 😂
This is what the Crysis remake should have looked like. Yeah, I know it's a different engine.
crytek is very capable gamedev
Where is steps?
I got scared for no reason at 5:14 😅
The only problem I see here is the sands that looks fake, way too regular. Rest is pretty darn good
Remake obsession
yeah games 100% gonna look like this in the future
i think its possible for near future
Wind sound just distracting. Could have been perfect 😢
There is wind and water is moving, palm trees motionless, no sign of sand in the air. No this demo did not surprise me
Looks good 🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴
the best walking simulator
Now it makes me want to wait for the 5090 instead getting the 4090😂
4090 is obsolete already imo, and true better buy smth like 4070 and wait, unless you have to buy it now then 4090 is great
I think those game engine devs don't hardwork on optimizing engines anymore, they rely on more powerfull GPUs, UE is great no doubt but heavy asf.
the photorealism is impressive but the vegetation is very static..
The camp fire looked terrible, the actual flames looked like a flat animation that turned when the camera panned.
No footprints in the sand?
And the physics are way off, walking over the rocky area would make us humans slow down, side step, go up, down over the bigger rocks etc...
Otherwise, the vegetation looks great but should all of the palm trees be the same height? Looked at bit unnatural at one point..?
cool
to bad the is no wind effect on the foliage. it would be 10 times more realistic
AC origins looks and feels better tbh
Cool!!!!
this look way to clean to be "photorealistic"
Why aren't PS5 games looking this good?!
Because ps5 is a low budget console. Great price to performance but not. Much power
they can make it look better for oled tvs, but guess gamedevs are lazy, or busy lol
Jolie les décors
Par contre, le feu 🔥 c'est pas encore ça
Pas réaliste..
OMG
I hope this demo is running at 4k without DLSS otherwise most people will get unplayable frame rates on any game that looks this good or is more populated with assets than this is. I doubt Ubisoft will make anything this nice they refuse to get with the picture and and stop using their shitty Anvil engine and move to the infinitely superior UE. If they do, maybe they'll finally stop having the worst character models in the industry
Fire doesn’t look remotely real. Looks like some particle effect used to try and make fire.
well the sound was... not the highlight here
RUclips AI thinks this is a real AC game.
black desert game^^
it looks good, but it's still no where close to real life. The water looks terribly fake, especially contrasted against the more realistic looking palm trees.
It's also just a desert landscape with a bunch of palm trees copy pasted in the middle of it. It still 'feel' like a level.
The fire isn't anywhere near close to real life either. Elements such as water and fire as notoriously difficult to render, regardless of these unreal engine advances.
Good, but not real life by any stretch.
If only someone had taken the time to find and use some decent sound fx. Ruins it all.
Sorry but that type of desert sand doesn't CRUNCH under your feet!
Looks nice but not like real life. More or less regular Unreal 4/5.
yea, when a 4000€ PC can render the avatar 2 in real time wake me...
Now put in NPCs
It looks like Battlefield 1
We will never see triple a games like this
Ofc we will don’t be daft
We will, just when things are better optimised and we start getting rid of 15 year old GPUs that cant handle a game at 720p, with the help of DLSS and FSR, a LOT of games are playable on even low spec PC's now
@@leighprout nah man quality is getting worse day by day even look at Gotham knights that game can’t even look better than a 7 year old Arkham knight
@@husix8876 I mean watching the pre release footage it was ovb just a cheap filler game for kids
this looks menyal
all of this and no footprints? lol games from 2008 had destractive ground footprints. the sounds are horrible too, his feet barely touches the tip of the water and it sounds like 10 people padel boat splashing through. the moon looks like a projector blinding all. the fire burn on two sticks and she looks like blazing tornado of molten lava. im not impressed. comeon you can do better. the wind on the sand looks cool thou, and the lights looks good too
O.O What?
Please remake ac origins
There is not much to improve here:)
Be prepared for massive downgrade when released and Get such quality of graphics at $60 DLC only.
The stepping sounds are total crap. Merging zone betw water-land is poop. Reflections are off. Foliages look way too 2D.
Optimisation 0/10... Ue5 is not for everyone, guys need to learn a better wokflow please... Compare to the first trailer reveal UE5, this demo look like UE4 not 5
Does it look amazing? Yes. Does it look photo realistic? No. And it won't for decades to come. Not even movies can get CG right and a frame for a movie is rendered over several hours. So stop with this hype.
Still not real. Far from reality but they can for sure
Watching in 480p:
- Nothing impressive bruh
looks like battlefield 1