Gibraltar - Short Fuse AP | World of Warships

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @CyberneticArgumentCreator
    @CyberneticArgumentCreator Месяц назад +6

    You never know if you're going to get an Adderall stream or a ketamine stream with MalteseKnight

  • @thepaperbagmask
    @thepaperbagmask Месяц назад +8

    Somebody wants you to play Austin? Hell yeah

  • @thegeneral123
    @thegeneral123 Месяц назад +5

    This ship needs a super heal and torps to just make it decent.

    • @Joshua-fi4ji
      @Joshua-fi4ji Месяц назад

      I've carried many a rank game it it. You may not like it, but it's pretty powerful.

  • @therepublic21
    @therepublic21 Месяц назад +10

    I hear some guy called Kyogre wants you to play and main Austin bro

  • @jebbyc6419
    @jebbyc6419 Месяц назад +2

    Outrageous push

  • @TeaBlaster
    @TeaBlaster Месяц назад

    wp

  • @AdamtheRed-
    @AdamtheRed- Месяц назад +1

    OP Gibraltar! Seems like it's underpriced in the RB.
    /s Lol. Great game, dude! Big Fan!

  • @vanvan-oc4nj
    @vanvan-oc4nj Месяц назад

    Nice play man !

  • @Ensign_Cthulhu
    @Ensign_Cthulhu Месяц назад +2

    I have considered this ship so many times, and every time it seems there has been something better. I guess it's the lack of both HE and torps that puts me off.

    • @davidpotts7116
      @davidpotts7116 Месяц назад +2

      Just get the Illinois. It’s a better Gibraltar - bb armor, bb hp, 9 second base reload, an underwater citadel, American super heavy cruiser AP, and access to HE in exchange for a slightly lower gun caliber (Gibraltar has 234s compared to Illinois’ 203s)

    • @Joshua-fi4ji
      @Joshua-fi4ji Месяц назад

      I like Gibraltar, but many don't. Compared to Goliath it does more meaningful damage (AP), has a better armour scheme (you won't get citadelled through the nose as much) and has light cruiser acceleration. (It is also much prettier to look at).
      It devastates DDs and does heavy damage to broadsides and can bow tank most other cruisers in close quarters and come off on top. Hindenburg is perhaps the only one you want to avoid this with.
      The smoke is nice, but don't rely on it like a normal smoke due to high detection and the secondaries are quite good for a cruiser.
      I put it as a sidegrade to Plymouth, but you lose some of your tools for more powerful guns and armour.
      Torps on it would be nice, but I always keep the ram flag on it so it makes a nice last ditch torpedo.
      I'd get Plymouth 1st and then decide if you want it, or alternatively go for it if you have the other RB ships you want.
      It's also more historically accurate to the CAs the UK was considering building around the time of WW2.

  • @matthewcasady6276
    @matthewcasady6276 Месяц назад

    WOWs has some of the most secure boarders in the world. No one has ever got across!

  • @seancritchlow5888
    @seancritchlow5888 Месяц назад

    Good old british knife crime

  • @msbblky
    @msbblky Месяц назад

    it should have started "allright"

  • @le_potate3861
    @le_potate3861 Месяц назад

    Sap is balanced

  • @Roo23th
    @Roo23th Месяц назад

    Gibraltar is worse than Plymouth ? [please explain your opinion]

    • @shriekinambassador5042
      @shriekinambassador5042 Месяц назад +1

      less utility. Plymouth is a utility package that provides a lot of cap control

  • @finol6127
    @finol6127 Месяц назад

    Ship is broken man.
    All that needs to be said

  • @Mazz53
    @Mazz53 Месяц назад

    First.

  • @DefinitelyEllie
    @DefinitelyEllie Месяц назад

    Gibraltar is so disappointing, and like, stupidly counter-intuitive? All its benefits point it towards being a close range ship, where as all its weaknesses say to keep it far away. No sense. It needs AT THE BARE MINIMUM, to have substancially better smoke fire penalty and deceleration speed. Like, we're talking cutting those in half at least.