Motorweek 2006 Chevrolet Impala Road Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
  • Motorweek 2006 Chevrolet Impala Road Test. I don't own this vide.

Комментарии • 24

  • @cld2930
    @cld2930 Месяц назад +1

    LOL I owned 3 Impalas.
    2003 LS 3.8 V6 4 speed automatic put about 108,000 miles on it. Great vehicle very reliable. Traded it for a 2007 LTZ 3.9 V6 4 speed automatic.
    Very reliable as well put 135,000 miles on it.
    Traded it for 2014 Limited LT 3.6 V6 6 speed automatic put 150,000 miles on that also very reliable.
    All them were all original and in great shape. I think the 3.6 V6 with 6 speed was my favorite.

  • @ubiased23
    @ubiased23 11 месяцев назад +7

    4 speed auto in 2006? Man that transmission is ancient.

    • @jessieharbinjr.6589
      @jessieharbinjr.6589 11 месяцев назад +7

      The entire platform was ancient, and they used it from 1988-2016

    • @jessieharbinjr.6589
      @jessieharbinjr.6589 11 месяцев назад +5

      2012-2016 they stuck the 3600 DOHC V6 and 6 speed automatic.

    • @flurpoid
      @flurpoid 4 месяца назад +3

      The Dodge Journey had a 4 speed auto until it was discontinued in 2021.

    • @xxyvng6831
      @xxyvng6831 28 дней назад

      @@flurpoidCuz the journey was a fiat

    • @Sunnywolf2001
      @Sunnywolf2001 15 дней назад

      @@jessieharbinjr.6589 hey I got a 2014 Impala LT with the 3.6 and it hasn’t given me any trouble. I got two years left to pay off on the loan but I guess that’s because I take care of my car.
      It’s not about if they sucked or not that’s your opinion but it normally boils down to do people take care of them or just run them into a ground and say they suck. I’m just saying.

  • @TJC450
    @TJC450 11 месяцев назад +5

    Should have just gotten the 3.8… idk why gm had so many engine options

    • @thechannelofrandomvideos789
      @thechannelofrandomvideos789 4 месяца назад +3

      The 3.6 for the 2012 Model was significantly better. I'll say, it added horsepower making 300.

  • @danielferstendig
    @danielferstendig 9 месяцев назад +5

    Thats not a midsize car thats a fullsize car ment to compete with five hundred/montego maxima avalon azera Diamante charger 300.

  • @bluethewhitekid5257
    @bluethewhitekid5257 Месяц назад +1

    must be nice having a working transmission

  • @COYGunners
    @COYGunners 2 месяца назад +5

    Rental lot hero

  • @fernandorocha901
    @fernandorocha901 11 месяцев назад +2

    Great and beautiful car

    • @ohguy1991
      @ohguy1991 13 дней назад

      Beautiful car??? Dude that's a rolling definition of boring! So bland and boring. That's why so many ended up as rental cars

  • @ohguy1991
    @ohguy1991 13 дней назад

    Absolutely terrible cars. I have a friend that had one and I sat in the back seat and couldn't believe how cramped and tight it was for such a large car. knee and foot room were very tight. Interior looked ok but material quality was crappy. GM kept plugging along with that ancient 4 speed auto and push rod engines while others were much more advanced. Hence the reason they still make Camry's, Accords, and Altima's while GM abandoned all passenger cars

  • @sleeksilver
    @sleeksilver 3 месяца назад +3

    Rolling mediocrity. They were the worst, most obvious signs of GM cost cutting. Even the SS was awful as it ate transmissions for breakfast.

    • @davidsoto7114
      @davidsoto7114 Месяц назад +2

      I thought these were reliable cars with reliable engines

    • @Sunnywolf2001
      @Sunnywolf2001 15 дней назад

      The only reason why the SS ate up transmissions because the transmission couldn’t handle the torque from the 5.3 L V8 and they’re way to remedy that so you complaining about it sucking carries no weight