Not really, a ryzen 7 2700 would still be better than a ryzen 3 3100 even though the 4 digit number is bigger. There are also other factors like what kind of work you'll be doing and what platform the CPU is on
@@capeworksnot exactly. They perform basically identically in gaming, but we crown the 7800x3d because gamers don’t need the extra cores from the 7950x3d. The 7800x3d is also a lot better value for gaming.
@@parliache3329 to be Frank 4100 is actually a 3100 but, even worse, because it has 4mb l3 cache, and it is pci e gen 3, so 3100 will win against 4100.
A 5950x is most definitely faster than a 7600, for gaming the 7600 will be faster, but for basically any larger workload the 5950x is going to kill it. Ryzen 7000 is about 20-50% faster than 5000 per core, but that doesn't make up for being down 10 cores (6 vs 16)
Came here to comment on this. Average usage: 5950x multitasking is miles above the 7600x. Power usage: You can overclock the 5950x and without giving up stability reach 75% of the 7950x's performance. If you hit the silicon lottery, you can definitely take that 75% and add another 5-8%. I was testing this myself and my 7950x with a 4.6Ghz overclock hits 76% if the 7950x as reference.
@@NahFam13 Nah bro, it depends a LOT on the workload, but lets look at some common tasks. Video encoding, 7950x is 175% the speed of a 5950x, 150% for code compile, 154% for ray rendering and lastly about 130% for compression/decompression. Things like gaming they're a lot closer, but things like workload tasks, the 7950x stands pretty far above the 5950x.
@@PineyJusticebut he wasn't comparing the 5950x to the 7950x he was comparing it to the 7600x. Do your analysis again with the 5950x Vs 7600x as stated in the video.
@@rathstar He was trying to say that the new gen is always better in the video. Probably basing things only on gaming performance. The only time I was comparing a 5950x to a 7950x was in reply to nahfam who thought a 5950x was 76% of a 7950x. It isn't.
@@PineyJustice Why you comparing those 2 cpus makes sense then. However I disagree with the statement that the later generation is always better than even one generation older regardless of the tier. With sometimes as low as a 10-15% generation improvement in many cases the higher speed of higher tier parts will make up for the generational improvement and the extra cores will smash the lower tier new parts in productivity tasks, eg. I'm sure the 5950x will smash the 7600x in productivity tasks that make use of the extra cores.
This is quite misleading. Just calling something “slower” is pretty disingenuous. Not everyone is exclusively gaming on their cpu. Maybe they need the extra cores and would rather go with a Ryzen 7 that’s older instead of a newer 5 or 3
@@I_Jakob_Islower in what? Gaming? If I’m rendering a 3d image that utilizes core count over core frequency, then the 3900x is faster than a 5600x. Hell it’s faster than a 7600x in multi core. Barely but it is. “Faster” is largely determined by what you’re actually testing. Not just a blanket statement
@@I_Jakob_I It depends on the workload. If you're decompressing 50gb of ROMs a 3950x is going to finish well before a 7600, meaning the 3950x is faster. Blender rendering, code compiling, video encoding, there are many tasks that utilize many cores, meaning the slower per core but more cores option will be faster. People doing purely gaming on a pc are actually the minority here, many people with high end computers use them for a lot of other stuff.
@@PineyJustice This is why a good review will include most of those benchmarks because there are so many different ways of loading a CPU that a couple synthetic benchmarks just cant account for.
Important to note that a chip like the 5950X is not *universally* slower than the next-gen R5. It’s still better for multicore workflows like Blender rendering. Worse for gaming though which realistically isn’t what it’s made for anyway.
@MasterMCGS yes, and an i3 from last year is slower than an i7 from 5 years ago. This video is literally common sense. That's like acting confused when your brand new base model ford ka is slower than a 10 year old mustang but your brand new higher spec mustang is faster "but they are all ford".
Nah not really - they used to, but there's no hard rule. Even now a Ryzen 9 can have 12 cores or 16 cores. Plus cores have kinda lost meaning anyway, Intel calls the 14900K a 24 core, but really it's just an 8 core. The 7950X3D is a true 16 core, but only 8 of those cores are the full X3D, so again the word 'cores' has kinda lost its power in performance conversations
5900x is a great cpu, still using one in my secondary pc, definitely wouldn't go back to it from my 7950x, but, it's still very usable. Many reviewers only focus on gaming performance, but for actual workloads ryzen 7000 is a way bigger improvement than the gaming benchmarks would show.
Late response but it depends. If you're gonna be using those cores, a 5700x will be fine paired with the rx 6600. You could also save that money and go for an r5 5600 or 5600x and get a rx 6700 for more vram which a lot of newer titles benefit from more
Bro you maybe should ad that they are slower in single Core Performance( Ryzen 9 5950x slower then Ryzen 5 7600x) because in multi core if there are such corcount diffrences then the better IPC and clocks cant make up for that
I went with r5 7600 for my 4070 ti super smoothly maxing out my 144hz at 1440p in both fps and AAA titles glad i saved money as my dealer said he said as long as i dont upgrade my monitor i dont need high end cpu .... saved some money and upgraded my case and aio so i can put a better cpu and mobo in the future
People, all his saying is it's not the R5, i9, etc. That matters. It's what comes after. I've had personal experience where friends and peers purely base their laptop on the series of the CPU like i5, R9, i7, etc.
I mean yeah, the ryzen numbers are moreso about the price point from my experience. 3 is low end and much more affordable, a 5 is mid range, 7 is higher end, and a 9 is top of its series. Ryzen itself also tells you its an AMD, and looking at the series numbers themselves tell you similar things. A 7 5600x is better than a 5 5600x, but probably would be similar to a 5 5900x. Their GPU's are also on a similar naming convention, which is part of why i prefer amd to intel and nvidia
This guy is the best PC Teacher 😂. When I first started learn PC parts, AMD was the most complicated CPU. I still don't know anything about the AMD GPUs. I have good knowledge of intel CPUs, AMD CPUs and Navida GPUs. When I am gonna build my PC. Ima make it with the following parts: Ryzen 5 7500F B650M Motherboard RTX 2060 Super 2×16 GB 5600 MHz Ram 1 TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 Any 850W 80+ bronze CERTIFIED What do you think. 🔥 Rate my build 1-10 🗿😎 The full Build with the Case would cost around USD 800$
@@MasterMCGS for GPU intensive tasks it is balanced. If not I will upgrade the CPU later down the road. Right right getting this build is more then I can afford. So, I am saving up for it
The 7500f is very close in price to the 7600, but has some significant downsides. You also generally want ddr5 6000 for zen 4 G.SKILL Trident Z5 Neo CL30-38-38-96 1.35V is the best choice there are not really any cost differences in the ram. You can also get a decently faster 6600xt for the same price as a 2060 super used.
@@PineyJustice Actually, the 7600 performs almost the same as the 7500f but it costs more because the 7600 has an iGPU. And If there is not much of a price difference in 6000 MHz Ram then I would get that. I know that AMD GPUs are significantly faster then Navida but I need those Cuda cores to run sodium(A Minecraft optimization mod) and the gpu has to be 2020 model or plus. This is the reason why I am going for the 2060 super used. If you have any better suggestions for Navida that meet these certain specs then you can let me know.
@@universalcrazygamer Ram is very important for ryzen cpus, also, the 7500f and 7600 might be close, but when you turn on PBO that 7600 turns into a 7600x With a little looking, the 7600 is available below 200$ while the 7500f is running around 180, so we're talking 10-20$ for a cpu with more cache and higher clocks.
Please, don’t take this seriously because I could be wrong. That first number of the 4 is the generation, that is the most important number because it says how early it was made. Between a 1700x (gen 1 bc no. 1) and a 3300x (gen 3 bc no. 3), the gen 3 is more developed, so the series doesn’t matter, only the model as he said. This may be incorrect because I only know intel, but it should all be universal.
Bruh the 5600x is faster in single core. That’s it. Multi core it gets slaughtered by a 3900x. Faster is too loose of a term for computers. Heck the 3900x still beats a 7600x in multi core despite the hugely faster single core performance.
My pecs for pc I7 14700k Asus Rtx 4070ti super Asus Rog strix gaming ddr 5 ram atx Acer predator Vesta 2 Nvme 2tb Samsung Liani 360 liquid cool 850 rox psu Cabinet that's i am thinking asus may be
The 5700g should be just fine for video editing. Editing is largely dependent on two factors: cpu core count and your storage. For remdering, it's a mostly cpu intensive task and more cores help. An ssd vs a hard drive will also improve performance while scrubbing through a timeline and minimize lags from slower storage.
He is speaking facts, the AMD Ryzen 7000 series is a legendary CPU, because of that 5nm transistor size, it's insanely powerful & extremely efficient while keeping temperatures cool. Meanwhile Intel's 14000 series is an absolute joke, the transitor size of 10nm really makes intel CPUs not only hotter, but it's insanely power hungry, to only get a slightly higher clock speeds. Intel's sockets for motherboards only last a couple of years whereas AMD keeps with the same cpu socket for more years. Intel CPUs does have one advantage though, the E cores can be more useful for productivity which does beat AMD, but intel draws so much wattage compared to AMD to get the same work done. So really I have no brand loyalty, I dont care if I get an intel or AMD CPU. Just make good products for reasonable performance and we will buy them. Intel isn't even trying with the CPUs anymore, but I will say Intel ARC has caught my attention. Surprisingly the first generation dedicated intel GPUs has way better Ray tracing performance than AMD Radeon. I found that to be a shocker, do we need ray tracing? The answer is no but, we should have an option to get reasonable Ray tracing performance for a decent price. I'm glad Intel is shaking up the market. One advice I've learned over the years, never have a brand loyalty mindset when it comes to the pc market. Not going to lie I was seriously considering getting an intel GPU paired up with the newest AMD CPU for the build in 2024. But this will probably change with a year or so. Innovation is what I like to see especially if that grants us better products for better prices all because of competition, I'm all for it!
@@jibrilherrcherofhorny4448 Intel sockets life will only last 2-3 generations. Which means every 2-3 years you need to get the new motherboard to get the greatest & latest from Intel. AMD sockets life will last 3 or more generations which means you wont have to switch your motherboard for a while to get the latest and greatest. What's your argument then? Trust me you're not that guy lmao.
Basically, Lower 4-digit numbers is worse than Higher 4-digit numbers.
Not really, a ryzen 7 2700 would still be better than a ryzen 3 3100 even though the 4 digit number is bigger.
There are also other factors like what kind of work you'll be doing and what platform the CPU is on
I guess, but one should always do their due diligence
Except for the 7800x3d vs 7950x3d, since 7800 is better for gaming
@@capeworks for gaming only
@@capeworksnot exactly. They perform basically identically in gaming, but we crown the 7800x3d because gamers don’t need the extra cores from the 7950x3d. The 7800x3d is also a lot better value for gaming.
But make sure you never compare a ryzen 3 to a last gen ryzen 9
but it would be faster than a 5-6 gen old ryzen 9
To bad there is no Ryzen 3 since the 3000 series.
@@goregejones7248 What about Ryzen 3 4100?
@@parliache3329 to be Frank 4100 is actually a 3100 but, even worse, because it has 4mb l3 cache, and it is pci e gen 3, so 3100 will win against 4100.
@@goregejones7248Ahh. Thanks for letting me know. Didn't knew 4100 is basically a slightly worse 3100 😅
A 5950x is most definitely faster than a 7600, for gaming the 7600 will be faster, but for basically any larger workload the 5950x is going to kill it. Ryzen 7000 is about 20-50% faster than 5000 per core, but that doesn't make up for being down 10 cores (6 vs 16)
Came here to comment on this.
Average usage: 5950x multitasking is miles above the 7600x.
Power usage: You can overclock the 5950x and without giving up stability reach 75% of the 7950x's performance. If you hit the silicon lottery, you can definitely take that 75% and add another 5-8%.
I was testing this myself and my 7950x with a 4.6Ghz overclock hits 76% if the 7950x as reference.
@@NahFam13 Nah bro, it depends a LOT on the workload, but lets look at some common tasks. Video encoding, 7950x is 175% the speed of a 5950x, 150% for code compile, 154% for ray rendering and lastly about 130% for compression/decompression. Things like gaming they're a lot closer, but things like workload tasks, the 7950x stands pretty far above the 5950x.
@@PineyJusticebut he wasn't comparing the 5950x to the 7950x he was comparing it to the 7600x. Do your analysis again with the 5950x Vs 7600x as stated in the video.
@@rathstar He was trying to say that the new gen is always better in the video. Probably basing things only on gaming performance. The only time I was comparing a 5950x to a 7950x was in reply to nahfam who thought a 5950x was 76% of a 7950x. It isn't.
@@PineyJustice Why you comparing those 2 cpus makes sense then.
However I disagree with the statement that the later generation is always better than even one generation older regardless of the tier.
With sometimes as low as a 10-15% generation improvement in many cases the higher speed of higher tier parts will make up for the generational improvement and the extra cores will smash the lower tier new parts in productivity tasks, eg. I'm sure the 5950x will smash the 7600x in productivity tasks that make use of the extra cores.
This is quite misleading. Just calling something “slower” is pretty disingenuous. Not everyone is exclusively gaming on their cpu. Maybe they need the extra cores and would rather go with a Ryzen 7 that’s older instead of a newer 5 or 3
It's still slower, even if it's better for whatever you need it for
@@I_Jakob_Islower in what? Gaming?
If I’m rendering a 3d image that utilizes core count over core frequency, then the 3900x is faster than a 5600x. Hell it’s faster than a 7600x in multi core. Barely but it is.
“Faster” is largely determined by what you’re actually testing. Not just a blanket statement
@@RiceCubeTech in everything other than your program. Even just desktop usage
@@I_Jakob_I It depends on the workload. If you're decompressing 50gb of ROMs a 3950x is going to finish well before a 7600, meaning the 3950x is faster. Blender rendering, code compiling, video encoding, there are many tasks that utilize many cores, meaning the slower per core but more cores option will be faster. People doing purely gaming on a pc are actually the minority here, many people with high end computers use them for a lot of other stuff.
@@PineyJustice This is why a good review will include most of those benchmarks because there are so many different ways of loading a CPU that a couple synthetic benchmarks just cant account for.
and here i'am still cookin with 5800X3D
I9-9900f ur lucky
Ryzen 5 2400G You're lucky@@NoAimILLUMI
@@TankerySMPryzen 3 3300u (laptop) you are lucky
@@K.A.M.I.L.A.H.M.E.D core 2 duo ur lucky
One of the best am4 chips out there btw
Important to note that a chip like the 5950X is not *universally* slower than the next-gen R5. It’s still better for multicore workflows like Blender rendering. Worse for gaming though which realistically isn’t what it’s made for anyway.
The numbers are based on the generation
The R3 R5 R7 R9 are for diffrent uses
Damn, who couldve guessed newer > older. Thats always been the case.
r7 2700 and r3 3100
@MasterMCGS yes, and an i3 from last year is slower than an i7 from 5 years ago. This video is literally common sense. That's like acting confused when your brand new base model ford ka is slower than a 10 year old mustang but your brand new higher spec mustang is faster "but they are all ford".
an i3 from last year actully performs better than a i7 from 5 years ago wdym@@TheMagicianOfGaming
@idrinkalmondmilk2918 yes single threaded they may be faster, but overall probably not.
@@TheMagicianOfGaming cars dont age the same as computer hardware, really bad comparison, but i kinda get what you mean
Don't the 5's 7's and 9's also tell you how many cores there are?
Nah not really - they used to, but there's no hard rule. Even now a Ryzen 9 can have 12 cores or 16 cores.
Plus cores have kinda lost meaning anyway, Intel calls the 14900K a 24 core, but really it's just an 8 core.
The 7950X3D is a true 16 core, but only 8 of those cores are the full X3D, so again the word 'cores' has kinda lost its power in performance conversations
@@CataclysmComputersbro can you recommend me a pc build for 1000$
@@SaravananV.J.I made a 1000 dollar PC build on PC part picker list I will put the link in my about section
@@Jobless_Rascal ok thx
@@SaravananV.J. the whole pc build may come to around 1100 it's a aesthetic build so it costs a little bit more just copy the link
In gaming. I think that would have been important to mention.
Well this is for gaming, but for multitasking and productivity, core count is important to check
bro's logic: 10105F > 9900K
12100f > 9900K in gaming
@@duck6966 lol ok , slight 7% OC on the 9900K and it's reversed
Same with intel 3/5/7/9
Those numbers mean nothing it’s only the model name that matters
If you specify for gaming then youre mostly correct. Any heavy multicore workload the 1700 will be faster than the 3300x etc etc.
Still on 5900X...
5900x is a great cpu, still using one in my secondary pc, definitely wouldn't go back to it from my 7950x, but, it's still very usable. Many reviewers only focus on gaming performance, but for actual workloads ryzen 7000 is a way bigger improvement than the gaming benchmarks would show.
Why even make it that confusing at first place? Why Not just make them faster based on the Series?
Make a short about pcs with good upgrade path and good performance in all budgets
I think buddy should watch a few more videos before posting the next one so he can get it right
This video feels familiar
How about Intel Core RTX 5800 X3D, it even comes with fast keyboard at 240 Hz. Per year.
Does ryzen 7 5700x + rx 6600 good?
Late response but it depends. If you're gonna be using those cores, a 5700x will be fine paired with the rx 6600. You could also save that money and go for an r5 5600 or 5600x and get a rx 6700 for more vram which a lot of newer titles benefit from more
Bro you maybe should ad that they are slower in single Core Performance( Ryzen 9 5950x slower then Ryzen 5 7600x) because in multi core if there are such corcount diffrences then the better IPC and clocks cant make up for that
I went with r5 7600 for my 4070 ti super smoothly maxing out my 144hz at 1440p in both fps and AAA titles glad i saved money as my dealer said he said as long as i dont upgrade my monitor i dont need high end cpu .... saved some money and upgraded my case and aio so i can put a better cpu and mobo in the future
Bro comparing old G vs fresh new G💀
no its just an example that the number of the "ryzen" is not important but rather on the model
It does mean something because no gamer needs something more than the lastest gen ryzen 5 or i5
these are actually the same for intel cpu's
‘the brand is amd, not too important’
Intel Ryzen 7800X3D
intel rtx 7800X3d
People, all his saying is it's not the R5, i9, etc. That matters. It's what comes after. I've had personal experience where friends and peers purely base their laptop on the series of the CPU like i5, R9, i7, etc.
I mean yeah, the ryzen numbers are moreso about the price point from my experience. 3 is low end and much more affordable, a 5 is mid range, 7 is higher end, and a 9 is top of its series. Ryzen itself also tells you its an AMD, and looking at the series numbers themselves tell you similar things. A 7 5600x is better than a 5 5600x, but probably would be similar to a 5 5900x. Their GPU's are also on a similar naming convention, which is part of why i prefer amd to intel and nvidia
I am using amd ryzen 5 5600 and rtx 3060 ti.I live turkey.Pc system is so expensive
Because Turkish goverment can not manage the economy!
Make videos for old components as well ❤
Suggest me " Top 3 GPU for Ryzen 5600G and 550 watt supply"
Some people need speed, some need more cores and then some just need a normal PC
where tf did you find that a ryzen 7 1700x is slower than 3300x
This guy is the best PC Teacher 😂.
When I first started learn PC parts, AMD was the most complicated CPU.
I still don't know anything about the AMD GPUs. I have good knowledge of intel CPUs, AMD CPUs and Navida GPUs. When I am gonna build my PC. Ima make it with the following parts:
Ryzen 5 7500F
B650M Motherboard
RTX 2060 Super
2×16 GB 5600 MHz Ram
1 TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0
Any 850W 80+ bronze CERTIFIED
What do you think. 🔥
Rate my build 1-10 🗿😎
The full Build with the Case would cost around USD 800$
a full 7500f with just an rtx 2060 super? thats not balanced
@@MasterMCGS for GPU intensive tasks it is balanced. If not I will upgrade the CPU later down the road. Right right getting this build is more then I can afford. So, I am saving up for it
The 7500f is very close in price to the 7600, but has some significant downsides. You also generally want ddr5 6000 for zen 4 G.SKILL Trident Z5 Neo CL30-38-38-96 1.35V is the best choice there are not really any cost differences in the ram. You can also get a decently faster 6600xt for the same price as a 2060 super used.
@@PineyJustice Actually, the 7600 performs almost the same as the 7500f but it costs more because the 7600 has an iGPU.
And If there is not much of a price difference in 6000 MHz Ram then I would get that.
I know that AMD GPUs are significantly faster then Navida but I need those Cuda cores to run sodium(A Minecraft optimization mod) and the gpu has to be 2020 model or plus. This is the reason why I am going for the 2060 super used. If you have any better suggestions for Navida that meet these certain specs then you can let me know.
@@universalcrazygamer Ram is very important for ryzen cpus, also, the 7500f and 7600 might be close, but when you turn on PBO that 7600 turns into a 7600x With a little looking, the 7600 is available below 200$ while the 7500f is running around 180, so we're talking 10-20$ for a cpu with more cache and higher clocks.
Please, don’t take this seriously because I could be wrong. That first number of the 4 is the generation, that is the most important number because it says how early it was made. Between a 1700x (gen 1 bc no. 1) and a 3300x (gen 3 bc no. 3), the gen 3 is more developed, so the series doesn’t matter, only the model as he said. This may be incorrect because I only know intel, but it should all be universal.
This also applies to intel
Last one is not true💀
7600x is faster in almost every benchmark
Bro Intel is easy to understand
I still can't get my head around the number like 5600x and 5600x3D or some shi.
"these numbers mean nothing"
therefore, ryzen 3 7320 > ryzen 9 5900
I think the model is also a kind of series like 1000 3000 5000 7000 series next will be 9000 series
But is the Ryzen 9 5950x faster than the 3300x or 5600x?
ah yes athlon 7800x3d
Same with intel cpu, an i3 12 generation is powerful than an i7 11 generation....
I thought this was common sense
Nope the numbers can be pretty confusing for an average consumer.
I mean, they DO matter if you care about the number of cores.
One of the reasons I like Intel more lol. I feel like the names are simplified and look better but of course that's just personal preference
AMD ❌
Intel ❌
Exact model number name and its reviews ✅
Can you make a video comparing 7900x3d with rtx 7800, rtx 7900, 4070
R9 is slower than R5...
When you try to look like a smart guy but your knowledge is limited by too much tick-tock
The Ryzen 5 5600X gives better FPS than a Ryzen 9 3950X so you’ll have to elaborate chief
you should mention slower in "single core" this video pretty misleading.
So ryzen 5 7600x won't bottleneck rtx 3090....
At 4k yes but 1080p no
@@RiyozsuWhat about 1440p
Guys I still can't accept the facts that 5 7600x performs as good as 5950x
@@Negs647 no problem
Which GPU will be the perfect pair with my i7 14700k for professional video editing and gaming
what about intel i7 7800x3d 🤔
Also more CACHE
When you gonna compare a amd gpu?
I don’t even use AMD Ryzen I use Intel core i7 9700K And RTX 3060 TI
U look like that one guy from ltt I think his name is Luke
Well no because series need to be compatible with your motherboard
Ryzen 9 7900 non x. Hell yeah
I have ryzen 9 7900x ...it's a good cpu
Connor!
Wish i knew this before i bought the ryzen 9 5950 rubbish
me with a Ryzen 3600 (non X)
Ryzen 3?
Is the ryzen 7 7800x3d a good pair for the rtx 4070ti/4070ti super ?
Which is better intel i5 12th gen or i7 11th gen
Bruh the 5600x is faster in single core. That’s it. Multi core it gets slaughtered by a 3900x. Faster is too loose of a term for computers.
Heck the 3900x still beats a 7600x in multi core despite the hugely faster single core performance.
that ryzen 3 xd
yeah i know
I don’t know what to choose can u help out pls.
Intel Core i9 11900KF + Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070 12G- 5,3GHZ - 32 GB DDR4 RAM
Or
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 8x5.3GHz | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT DX12 | 32GB DDR5 RAM
Or
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8x4.5GHz | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060Ti 16GB DX12 | 32GB DDR4 RAM
Rtx 3050 8gb vs rx 6600 8gb
Sir I would like to buy i7 processor for architecture ( I will use graphic card 3050)
which one of them better ryzen 5 7600 or ryzen 5 7600x and is the 7600x actually worth it?
what’s upgrade option for r5 5600 pls answer, thanks
Still need ways to know am4 vs am5
name doesnt matter eh? me with a intel motherboard and a 5950x
ryzen 9 7900X3D is in all factors better than 7800X3D more L3 more boost more Cores
What processor should you pair with rx 7900 gre
What is the best cpu to pair with rx 6700 xt?
Is it worth buying ASROCK B760M PG RIPTIDE for i5 13400F and RTX 4060? please answer someone!!!!
Is the 3060ti good for 1440p
My pecs for pc
I7 14700k
Asus Rtx 4070ti super
Asus Rog strix gaming ddr 5 ram atx
Acer predator Vesta 2
Nvme 2tb Samsung
Liani 360 liquid cool
850 rox psu
Cabinet that's i am thinking asus may be
sir what about Ryzen 7 5700g is it good for editing ?
The 5700g should be just fine for video editing. Editing is largely dependent on two factors: cpu core count and your storage. For remdering, it's a mostly cpu intensive task and more cores help. An ssd vs a hard drive will also improve performance while scrubbing through a timeline and minimize lags from slower storage.
Do you recommend overclock?
Nah thats fax
He is speaking facts, the AMD Ryzen 7000 series is a legendary CPU, because of that 5nm transistor size, it's insanely powerful & extremely efficient while keeping temperatures cool. Meanwhile Intel's 14000 series is an absolute joke, the transitor size of 10nm really makes intel CPUs not only hotter, but it's insanely power hungry, to only get a slightly higher clock speeds. Intel's sockets for motherboards only last a couple of years whereas AMD keeps with the same cpu socket for more years. Intel CPUs does have one advantage though, the E cores can be more useful for productivity which does beat AMD, but intel draws so much wattage compared to AMD to get the same work done. So really I have no brand loyalty, I dont care if I get an intel or AMD CPU. Just make good products for reasonable performance and we will buy them. Intel isn't even trying with the CPUs anymore, but I will say Intel ARC has caught my attention. Surprisingly the first generation dedicated intel GPUs has way better Ray tracing performance than AMD Radeon. I found that to be a shocker, do we need ray tracing? The answer is no but, we should have an option to get reasonable Ray tracing performance for a decent price. I'm glad Intel is shaking up the market. One advice I've learned over the years, never have a brand loyalty mindset when it comes to the pc market. Not going to lie I was seriously considering getting an intel GPU paired up with the newest AMD CPU for the build in 2024. But this will probably change with a year or so. Innovation is what I like to see especially if that grants us better products for better prices all because of competition, I'm all for it!
Exactly
What gonna be your argument when next gen Intel is on 3nm and AMD 4nm ?
@@jibrilherrcherofhorny4448 You sure did not read my whole comment, can't fix stupid I suppose.
@@jibrilherrcherofhorny4448 Intel sockets life will only last 2-3 generations. Which means every 2-3 years you need to get the new motherboard to get the greatest & latest from Intel. AMD sockets life will last 3 or more generations which means you wont have to switch your motherboard for a while to get the latest and greatest. What's your argument then? Trust me you're not that guy lmao.
@@niko2002 that I keep my CPU for more than a single AMD socket life ? What your argument then ? I would still have changed socket from AMD then
To simplify:
7950
7-generation
9-power level (1-4 for ryzen 3, 5-6 for 5, 7-8 for 7 and 9 for 9)
50/00->revision, bigger is better I guess?
Pls tell what CPU to pair with RTX 3080 + RTX 2080 Ti
Any ryzen 5000 and above and Intel 12th gen and above. No i3 or ryzen 5000g cpu.
K thx@@Riyozsu
so damn misleading
Rubbish camera panning
Just buy Intel.
amd is currently better ;)
Ouha
Daddy
Thats uow they sell a same chip for 5 years