Love your content chap - can’t understand why you are not getting more hits. You are clear, concise and a really natural presenter. Don’t stop pushing these videos out!
Good presentation and well explained keep going im sure your viewer's will increase top man good explanation on the ring mains the problem with the industry is that we should all be clear on certain coding and not just to satisfy the customer for an outcome. Shame on company's telling their staff C3 and not C2 needs looked at in a big way but nothing will happen until something happens. Good man
Can you do a worked example of a ring final cable calculation? Usually everyone defaults to table H2.1 (OSG) and automatically installs a A1 ring without giving it a second thought. It would be good to know the maths behind it! Thanks James, a great content btw👍👍
Very helpful Could you possibly explain in further detail shaver sockets, I think I have asked previously so sorry for that Looking to further understand how a shock is not received even though path to earth is present Great videos
Why is it that these special locations might require supplementary bonding when the main bonding should already be achieving the same thing, which is an equal potential difference between the extraneous parts? Is supplementary supposed to be a backup just in case the main bonding fails or isn't installed properly? Is there another purpose for it?
Hi, Thank you for your question. Supplementary bonding is applied to both extraneous conductive parts and exposed conductive parts of electrical equipment, and is a method of providing additional protection against electric shock. The reason for the requirement in the special locations mentioned is due to the specific risks in those locations, such as medical locations for example. Regards James
Love your content chap - can’t understand why you are not getting more hits. You are clear, concise and a really natural presenter. Don’t stop pushing these videos out!
Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. I'm glad you like the video.
Regards
James
Good presentation and well explained keep going im sure your viewer's will increase top man good explanation on the ring mains the problem with the industry is that we should all be clear on certain coding and not just to satisfy the customer for an outcome. Shame on company's telling their staff C3 and not C2 needs looked at in a big way but nothing will happen until something happens. Good man
Hi Stephen, thanks for your comment. I'm glad you like the video.
Regards
James
Can you do a worked example of a ring final cable calculation? Usually everyone defaults to table H2.1 (OSG) and automatically installs a A1 ring without giving it a second thought. It would be good to know the maths behind it! Thanks James, a great content btw👍👍
Very helpful
Could you possibly explain in further detail shaver sockets, I think I have asked previously so sorry for that
Looking to further understand how a shock is not received even though path to earth is present
Great videos
Good vid 👍
Could you also do a video on harmonics ( a dummy’s guide ) from scratch basically
Why is it that these special locations might require supplementary bonding when the main bonding should already be achieving the same thing, which is an equal potential difference between the extraneous parts? Is supplementary supposed to be a backup just in case the main bonding fails or isn't installed properly? Is there another purpose for it?
Hi,
Thank you for your question. Supplementary bonding is applied to both extraneous conductive parts and exposed conductive parts of electrical equipment, and is a method of providing additional protection against electric shock. The reason for the requirement in the special locations mentioned is due to the specific risks in those locations, such as medical locations for example.
Regards
James