Which 442 variant is the best against 857? 【Lords Mobile】
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- In this video I've compared 884, 974, 875 against 857 in different phalanxes. You'll be able to get a better insight into 442 variants and more thoughtfully decide which comp to use.
13:03 - summary table of results
• 【Lords Mobile】The dyna... - More about 442 wining mechanism
• 【Lords Mobile】Comprehe... - hell drider testing
If you want to understand the battles in lords mobile, check my channel and you'll have mastery of knowledge in pvp game play.
If you want to see more of informative contents, don't forget to subscribe!
#lordsmobile
#lordsmobileads
#igg
#lordsmobilerallytrap
#Crystal briefs
#lordsmobilef2p
#lordsmobilerallies
#lordsmobiletrap
#lordsmobiletips
Aevatrex gave you shoutout, congratulations for 1k subs
Yeh
so happy your channel has grown!
Purnama jancok jancok penipuan agama!
More wow actions like last video 💯
Hi thank you very much for these videos, they are great although somewhat difficult to understand for players new to wow, but I have 2 questions for you I wish you could help me.
Why do you use a ranged phalanx in a 442 composition and not an infantry phalanx?
And what would be the result between a 442 and a 758? As I say I am new to practicing wow. Thanks
the table at the end is even more complicated to understand but I will continue watching the video as many times as necessary to learn and understand it
Have you checked this video out?ruclips.net/video/4Qn40m1g1vI/видео.html
There's some insights there for what you ask about.
442 inf phal can be used at appropriate times. That's when you confront another 442 but against a 424 variants (857 749 947 etc) doing inf phal usually leads to terrible outcome..
Also if you watch my videos on testing new updates you'll get more used to the conventions I adopt for creating a table.
@@crystalbriefs Thank you brother really few youtubers take the time to answer questions, I hope you keep growing and creating content as good as this, and in advance thank you very much for clarifying my doubts and I saw most of your videos and I am with little clear, hopefully you upload videos of your battles in wow would be great to see you in action.
I need a video on how to defend yourself against an 866 please.
I admire your excellent understanding.
However, a fatal stain exists on the ratio test.
Can you elaborate?
thank you a lot for the 055 tips, it works like a swiss clock!! just perfect....
noob question ... have you ever consider 794 against 848? waht may be the outcome?
794 will comfortably beat 424 in rng phal especially with hell drider. But if 424 takes inf phal 794 would be weaker than other 442 variants with less rng and/or more cav.
So the best comp in inf/range should be 884 with bring 37.5 inf , because when inf is the biggest number it can effective to inherit all 750% familiar damage that ur range can keep attack all time in 40s
You mean against inf and ranged phalanx?
hey bro, can u do a 208 in depth guide, i feel like i see alot of people using it wrong tbh
Will do that!
Hello great video... Please can you make a video about champion gear, I want to put a CHAMP piece in my mix set from the beginning but I just stare at the screen for hours thinking of which to build since it's so expensive don't wanna waste manes or money
Noted!
Are purple Mitts better or a lunar scimitar for a infantry front solo trap
I first thought Lunar scimitar would be better, but turns out that question was much more profound because the situation is limited to inf front. Lunar scimitar would be better to take a cav hit because of the higher rng atk. However, if you take an inf hit, the ranged atk is wasted so mitts might be better with a bit of army def also. Not sure about ranged hit tho.
@@crystalbriefs ohk
I don't plan on going full CHAMP that extra investment will get better returns in familiar or artifacts
Familiar
Thanks mate
You just lost the status of being a hidden gem ;)
Do you have the table?
Table of the data?
Anyone want to swap account? Only 1billion+might becoz,, my account also 1billion+ mights
you should know that your test results are heavily wrong due to t2 usage. troops in lm have different stats, imagine it has like lets say t2 has 200 atk, 20 def, 200 hp. t5s have 500 atk, 50 def, 500 hp(numbers are imaginery but im sure its something close to that). thus any % benefit you have will work on t5s a lot more, including familiars. so the significance of %1000 cav atk is way more important on t5s than t2, which can heavily shift any result. you should never run tests with t2s.
Did you actually check that the result would be completely different when you replace t2 with t5 on both sides without changing anything else, considering pact 5s can attack a different squad?
I was fully aware of what you explained when I made this video, and I was pretty sure the t2 results do not contradict with the real ones on a mechanistic level. In fact, I discovered so many mechanisms with t2 testing and successfully applied it to real wow situations. If t2 testing is completely wrong, how was I able to apply t2 results to real wow situations?