We hope you enjoyed that! Here are more programmes in this series: Episode 1: What does 'fake' really mean? 👉 ruclips.net/video/8X5B93C6OKI/видео.html Episode 2: Where does 'news' come from? 👉 ruclips.net/video/Dp3IhBM2e-4/видео.html Episode 3: Information or disinformation? 👉 ruclips.net/video/OLu4AcRaK_o/видео.html Episode 4: Fake news in the age of coronavirus 👉 ruclips.net/video/E0PKtf1hfvc/видео.html
BBC learning english is very helpful youtube channel. We are benefited from this youtube channel. Their english learning process is very good. We should be watched to this channel's every video if we would like to learn in english property. I hope all english learner must be watched to this channels all video. I must watch. In future we shall grow up our english knowledge.
Hi Amit. Thank you for your comment. You seem to be a very keen learner. Visit our website for more videos, guides and quizzes to help you improve your English: www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/ 😉
This programme is truthly useful to me. But, could you possibly supplement videos with subtitles ? There were some words that i can't clearly listen to . Thank you !
@@bbclearningenglish thank you BBC for being a great channel to learn English from. I have a habit of looking at subtitles when i watch a video because this help me remember words that i' ve come across.
BBC to tell the truth this program is useful for many people Who trust everything what he see, thank you for work it's time to understand the truth and reality which arounds us, the main awful moment that there are a lot of People Who does not want to know the truth, sometimes they afraid to know truth. They begin to trust everything thinking it's true
@@zarinaorynkhanova8881 I've stumbled upon two versions: (1) A lie travels around the globe while the truth is putting on its shoes, (2) A lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on. I wasn't sure about the ending. Thanks to you, I know that he said 'its pants on.'
Hello, Ana Paula. Thank you for your comment - we are glad you like our video. There is another series you might like: News Review. Here is the playlist: bit.ly/3iSkaJf
BBC Learning English - whatever happened to educative content (geography, history, high culture)? - media and politically based stuff gets very boring after a while and many ESL/EFL students do not find it interesting.
Hi Annabelle. Maybe it's about the way the knowledge is presented and made relevant. We teach English and try to make it interesting. We have a series called The Teachers' Room which offers a range of teaching techniques and ideas for language lessons. bbc.in/2FniGIj
Samantha Bradshaw sounds reasonable, but I don't think she was aware of how little control over the flow of information that journalists, editors, and TV channels once held. Yes, with a keyboard, fake news, and/or disinformation can spread to thousands of people in no time, and she mentions that this condition can impact, and affect democracy, and she is absolutely correct regarding those elements. Whether she has awareness, or not, she failed to mention how practically every single major social media website, has gradually been implementing new rules, guidelines, regulations, and policies for its users over the past couple of years, along with new mechanisms for enforcing these new rules, to where anybody can be easily removed/deleted from their site. Not only can their account be deactivated, but it can be so thoroughly deleted that no single trace of evidence will remain that could suggest said account did once exist upon that website. Hell, YT will make my comments appear invisible to everyone except myself, unless I'm logged into a different account. I can return to a comment section where I had posted a comment, and as long as I am logged into the same account that I used to post said comment, it will still be there for me to read, a day later, a week, a month, etc. just so long as I'm using the same account, but to everyone else (including me logged into a different account), there will be no trace of my comment. This does not happen to all of my comments, just specific ones that had violated a new rule they had created of which I was unaware. Further, YT never bothered to inform me once that there was a problem with any of my censored comments, yet I have received warnings about posting potential "hate" comments asking me if I was sure I wanted to post said comment as written. Most of the time, it was just some bot that was unable to factor in context to realize that the comment had no hate within. Yet, they still informed me of my potential violation of their rules, and then inquired what to do about it. However, with my censored comments not one peep, plus they intentionally misled me to believe that my comment had posted successfully, and was present for anyone, and everyone to read. One would figure from standard practice, including how YT handles other violations of their rules that I should have been informed on some level that there was some issue with my comments, but no . . . nothing. Then again, I guess that would have informed me that I was being censored, while keeping me in the dark regarding the removal/censorship of some of my comments, they would be able to hide the censorship behind for some unknown length of time surely longer than what it would have been if they actually informed of such activity. One would assume that YT would follow what would be considered standard practice in dealing with unwanted comments, and when there was potential violation of the rules from one of my comments, one would assume that YT would handle it in a standard common fashion practice, and in some similar fashion as to how they handle other comment violations. Other violations, they would inform me of the potential violation, which would have likely been followed by some "READ OUR RULES AND GUIDELINES, and then either post again making sure to follow our rules, or if you feel that our removal was wrong, please contact us at XXX." No, not one single word concerning this matter. So, I have no clue as to how long this practice may have been affecting my posted comments. Maybe I discovered this rather inconsiderate, and likely malevolent practice shortly after it was first applied to my comments, or perhaps it had been in effect for a few years, I just do not know. Regardless, in knowing this method of censorship exists, and is in practice, only adds to the believability that these social media websites are making changes so they can, not only disappear entire accounts of those who speak a little too much of this or that topic, but more importantly, is the fact that none of this has anything to do with creating a safe place free from the bad, boogey men, nor about protecting the children, or any other horse crap justification. This boils down to censorship, and establishing the means to have complete control over the "free flow" of information . . . and all of this tyrannical behavior will be performed under the guise of nothing has changed here, go about your usual business of sharing videos of your cats, with their worms sticking half way out, and being dragged behind them, but don't you dare mention how the votes of some election simply do not add up correctly, nor mention how some major global news event has happened, and is being reported on, prior to it actually occurring, and then having the cojones to actually question how such an event could happen! She is living within a distorted reality that limits her perspectives, which in turn limit her understanding of the world around her, and therefore, she has failed to see that the way in which fake news affects democracy runs deeper, and more complex than her simplistic structures of cause and effect. Things do not appear as they truly are!
Are you suggesting that some people actually like fake news? As if fake news is not fake news because it is news that is fake, but rather because it is news that the person labelling it as being "fake news", simply does not like it. If you desire accuracy in your reporting, then why not refer to it as being "unliked news", rather than trying to psychologically manipulate your audience into projecting false definitions onto popular terms as a means to control the general populace's perspective.
We hope you enjoyed that! Here are more programmes in this series:
Episode 1: What does 'fake' really mean? 👉 ruclips.net/video/8X5B93C6OKI/видео.html
Episode 2: Where does 'news' come from? 👉 ruclips.net/video/Dp3IhBM2e-4/видео.html
Episode 3: Information or disinformation? 👉 ruclips.net/video/OLu4AcRaK_o/видео.html
Episode 4: Fake news in the age of coronavirus 👉 ruclips.net/video/E0PKtf1hfvc/видео.html
Thank you so much indeed ❤
BBC Learning English has sincere heart to share knowledge and teach English. Thanks for all of your efforts. ♥️
BBC learning english is very helpful youtube channel. We are benefited from this youtube channel. Their english learning process is very good. We should be watched to this channel's every video if we would like to learn in english property. I hope all english learner must be watched to this channels all video. I must watch. In future we shall grow up our english knowledge.
Hi Amit. Thank you for your comment. You seem to be a very keen learner. Visit our website for more videos, guides and quizzes to help you improve your English: www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/ 😉
This programme is truthly useful to me. But, could you possibly supplement videos with subtitles ? There were some words that i can't clearly listen to . Thank you !
Hi Bridget. We are glad you find our video useful and... good news: this video has subtitles (you just have to activate the subtitles).
@@bbclearningenglish That's wonderful . Thanks for your helpfulness.
Amazing program! BBC is always fantastic!
Everything we hear is an opinion
Not a fact
Everything we see is a perspective
Not the truth gy
I wanted the pillow brand of BBC learning English 😍😍😍
I love this program. It's amazing!!!
I like your teaching so much
Amazing
I love you BBC learning English
Woa, a new type of program. Very exciting. Thank you so much !
Great
It would be better if this video had subtitles.
It would be, but I think it's a training for real conversations
Alana has a good point. But if you need subtitles, you just have to activate them on the screen.
@@bbclearningenglish thank you BBC for being a great channel to learn English from. I have a habit of looking at subtitles when i watch a video because this help me remember words that i' ve come across.
good vid
Thank you, BBC>
BBC to tell the truth this program is useful for many people Who trust everything what he see, thank you for work it's time to understand the truth and reality which arounds us, the main awful moment that there are a lot of People Who does not want to know the truth, sometimes they afraid to know truth. They begin to trust everything thinking it's true
Good team. I always watched u r programme.
7:41 the way Hugo said it was so unclear to my ear that I neeeded to browse this saying. Still don't know what he exactly said.
He quoted W. Churchill who once ironically remarked that " A lie goes half around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on".
@@zarinaorynkhanova8881 I've stumbled upon two versions: (1) A lie travels around the globe while the truth is putting on its shoes, (2) A lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on. I wasn't sure about the ending. Thanks to you, I know that he said 'its pants on.'
@@yawallo I didn't know about the other 2 versions! Thank you!
Hi yawallo. The video has subtitles - you just have to activate them.
I'm really loving this new format😍 Greetings from Brazil 🇧🇷
Hello, Ana Paula. Thank you for your comment - we are glad you like our video.
There is another series you might like: News Review. Here is the playlist: bit.ly/3iSkaJf
Thanks for another good episode)
Thanks for watching!
I'm really proud of you.
Love from india
Great👍😁
Remarkable
Keep up to date with language, advice and news related to coronavirus. Here's our RUclips playlist: bit.ly/312yUyR
It's an interested program
*interesting
Yes💖
Hi Metwaly Aziz. Thank you for your feedback. We are glad you find our video interesting.
From BBC
In Italy we use propaganda with the same meaning.
From BBC.
BBC Learning English - whatever happened to educative content (geography, history, high culture)?
- media and politically based stuff gets very boring after a while and many ESL/EFL students do
not find it interesting.
Hi Annabelle. Maybe it's about the way the knowledge is presented and made relevant. We teach English and try to make it interesting. We have a series called The Teachers' Room which offers a range of teaching techniques and ideas for language lessons. bbc.in/2FniGIj
Probably it just seems to me that Sam is sad all the time.
Fake is the new f word 😮
Samantha Bradshaw sounds reasonable, but I don't think she was aware of how little control over the flow of information that journalists, editors, and TV channels once held. Yes, with a keyboard, fake news, and/or disinformation can spread to thousands of people in no time, and she mentions that this condition can impact, and affect democracy, and she is absolutely correct regarding those elements.
Whether she has awareness, or not, she failed to mention how practically every single major social media website, has gradually been implementing new rules, guidelines, regulations, and policies for its users over the past couple of years, along with new mechanisms for enforcing these new rules, to where anybody can be easily removed/deleted from their site. Not only can their account be deactivated, but it can be so thoroughly deleted that no single trace of evidence will remain that could suggest said account did once exist upon that website.
Hell, YT will make my comments appear invisible to everyone except myself, unless I'm logged into a different account. I can return to a comment section where I had posted a comment, and as long as I am logged into the same account that I used to post said comment, it will still be there for me to read, a day later, a week, a month, etc. just so long as I'm using the same account, but to everyone else (including me logged into a different account), there will be no trace of my comment. This does not happen to all of my comments, just specific ones that had violated a new rule they had created of which I was unaware. Further, YT never bothered to inform me once that there was a problem with any of my censored comments, yet I have received warnings about posting potential "hate" comments asking me if I was sure I wanted to post said comment as written. Most of the time, it was just some bot that was unable to factor in context to realize that the comment had no hate within. Yet, they still informed me of my potential violation of their rules, and then inquired what to do about it. However, with my censored comments not one peep, plus they intentionally misled me to believe that my comment had posted successfully, and was present for anyone, and everyone to read. One would figure from standard practice, including how YT handles other violations of their rules that I should have been informed on some level that there was some issue with my comments, but no . . . nothing. Then again, I guess that would have informed me that I was being censored, while keeping me in the dark regarding the removal/censorship of some of my comments, they would be able to hide the censorship behind for some unknown length of time surely longer than what it would have been if they actually informed of such activity. One would assume that YT would follow what would be considered standard practice in dealing with unwanted comments, and when there was potential violation of the rules from one of my comments, one would assume that YT would handle it in a standard common fashion practice, and in some similar fashion as to how they handle other comment violations. Other violations, they would inform me of the potential violation, which would have likely been followed by some "READ OUR RULES AND GUIDELINES, and then either post again making sure to follow our rules, or if you feel that our removal was wrong, please contact us at XXX." No, not one single word concerning this matter. So, I have no clue as to how long this practice may have been affecting my posted comments. Maybe I discovered this rather inconsiderate, and likely malevolent practice shortly after it was first applied to my comments, or perhaps it had been in effect for a few years, I just do not know.
Regardless, in knowing this method of censorship exists, and is in practice, only adds to the believability that these social media websites are making changes so they can, not only disappear entire accounts of those who speak a little too much of this or that topic, but more importantly, is the fact that none of this has anything to do with creating a safe place free from the bad, boogey men, nor about protecting the children, or any other horse crap justification. This boils down to censorship, and establishing the means to have complete control over the "free flow" of information . . . and all of this tyrannical behavior will be performed under the guise of nothing has changed here, go about your usual business of sharing videos of your cats, with their worms sticking half way out, and being dragged behind them, but don't you dare mention how the votes of some election simply do not add up correctly, nor mention how some major global news event has happened, and is being reported on, prior to it actually occurring, and then having the cojones to actually question how such an event could happen!
She is living within a distorted reality that limits her perspectives, which in turn limit her understanding of the world around her, and therefore, she has failed to see that the way in which fake news affects democracy runs deeper, and more complex than her simplistic structures of cause and effect. Things do not appear as they truly are!
Are you suggesting that some people actually like fake news? As if fake news is not fake news because it is news that is fake, but rather because it is news that the person labelling it as being "fake news", simply does not like it. If you desire accuracy in your reporting, then why not refer to it as being "unliked news", rather than trying to psychologically manipulate your audience into projecting false definitions onto popular terms as a means to control the general populace's perspective.
Great