Glad you enjoyed it. I've been tinkering with it a bit, but as this video wasn't particularly well received relative to the level of effort it took to make it I'm not certain if I'll follow-up with another :)
This is about the only game ive got in my steam oibrary that actually works reasonably well on the steam deck thats lay on a shelf gathering dust for the past 12 months. Finally!
Definitely takes more work. I generally stream for 3 hours at a time, and I just start and stop 3 hours later. With something like this it was about 16 hours of recorded gameplay footage, and then script recording and editing. Total time consumption more like 40 hours.
Just another 100 days spam tuber? Lol. I haven’t decided whether to make another one yet. This video took like 50 hours to make and only got a couple thousand views. Not exactly a good return on effort when a 3 hour livestream performs way better. Nice to see cynicism is alive and well though.
@@CrypticFoxGaming Thanks for the reply, the 100 days format is overused by people looking to get clicks, putting it on games that don't have any survival mechanics and can be got to 100 days by just being sat AFK is the height of spam tuber behaviour - copying a trend that doesn't apply to the content or views. Like people putting "JCS Inspired" on videos that have no relation to true crime analysis, or "Can you beat X while Y" when Y bears no impediment on the X. I very nearly didn't watch it at all, Floydson obviously has the market cornered for this specific game/video style combo, but your style and narration are good enough to hold their own, so it's a shame you gimped yourself by using the format. If another was in the works I would sub, but your other content isn't of interest to me. No offence intended by this, maybe it is cynicism - maybe 30 years online has jaded me to peoples intent when it comes to content creation - or maybe the dozens of "100 days" videos in the recommended have made me see a pattern. Hey, if you make a part two, don't forget to stitch the parts together and release it again as "I survived 200 days - THE MOVIE" 😂
@@stykytte good lord. I had no intention of stitching the parts of it together to make it “the movie”. At the end of the day though, content creators generally gravitate to what brings views and revenue. Really not surprising that when a style or theme is trending different people try it out. At the end of the day though I’m going to do what I want 😉
Every damn time I see someone toss the body into the river makes me mad. Any random shmucks body fan tossed, the one Yorick tossed can actually have fat and blood removed to make the body all white skulls which slightly improves the time to improve the graveyard. Also first techs should always be “Hardspares” and “Softspares”
@@CrypticFoxGaming Your good man, just curious. Was a fun video to watch the first time and will enjoy it again. lol. Might have to pick myself up Graveyard Keeper here soon because of it.
@@CrypticFoxGaming On my like 5th playthrough of Stardew and Valheim. So probably would at least play through Graveyard Keeper a few times knowing myself with those Farming life sim like games.
This is atleast the 3rd time this video has been deleted and reuploaded. Shame on you fox, I thought you were better than to follow behaviour only usually done by scammers or really desperate.
Excuse me? I tested a comparison of the upload on my primary channel (this one) and my secondary channel to see if having this channel predominantly focuses on streams had a negative impact on uploaded content. Having tested that I deleted it and re-uploaded it here. Don’t propose to lecture me. If you don’t want to see it don’t click it.
@@CrypticFoxGaming Not trying to lecture anyone, but this doesn't excuse the fact the apparent same content was posted a total of three times with the same name and no other indication if it was different (part of a new series, test, etc). The only way a viewer could tell was to watch it, a very cynical way many dodgy channels continue to use get views counts. So it was an experiment plus a mistake? Fine, i believe you. Reason I was upset that it seemed so out of character for you and I've already seen other channels slide into obscurity all for views and viewer numbers, don't want to see your channel go down this slippery slope.
@@ErraticPT Well one would think given that's not how I act you would give me the benefit of the doubt as opposed to chastising me in some condescending manner.
@@ErraticPT Oh, but you were being disrespectful and condescending based on an assumption. Shame on you. You clearly didn't think he was "better than that" to assume the worst so quickly. IJS I can think of 5 things totally normal as to the reason why and none of them involve desperate or scammy intentions. (simple because this channel has never executed any scum tactics)
Love this its so good. can't wait for part 2 if there will be one
I love this new formula!
I would love to see a part 2
Glad you enjoyed it. I've been tinkering with it a bit, but as this video wasn't particularly well received relative to the level of effort it took to make it I'm not certain if I'll follow-up with another :)
I had a lot of fun watching that
Great story telling.
I hope it gets more views, so we get part 2 (sooner 😅)
Love this format! I can't wait for part 2!
This is about the only game ive got in my steam oibrary that actually works reasonably well on the steam deck thats lay on a shelf gathering dust for the past 12 months.
Finally!
Oh I thought the steam deck ran most things ok. That’s a shame :P
@@CrypticFoxGaming Afraid not. Controller issues for 50%. Compatibility issues for 49%. Biggest hardware mistake I've made in a long time.
@@cmcc3721 Oof that sucks
this was fantastic
Thanks Luke
Congrats for surviving 100 days in a game that is not a survival game.
Took all my skill 🤣
Please do more🥺🥺💜💜
Was it more work to talk for that long or less work than live streams? I love it, but all of the content you create is pretty great.
Definitely takes more work. I generally stream for 3 hours at a time, and I just start and stop 3 hours later. With something like this it was about 16 hours of recorded gameplay footage, and then script recording and editing. Total time consumption more like 40 hours.
You finishing this or just another "100 days" spam tuber?
Just another 100 days spam tuber? Lol. I haven’t decided whether to make another one yet. This video took like 50 hours to make and only got a couple thousand views. Not exactly a good return on effort when a 3 hour livestream performs way better. Nice to see cynicism is alive and well though.
@@CrypticFoxGaming Thanks for the reply, the 100 days format is overused by people looking to get clicks, putting it on games that don't have any survival mechanics and can be got to 100 days by just being sat AFK is the height of spam tuber behaviour - copying a trend that doesn't apply to the content or views. Like people putting "JCS Inspired" on videos that have no relation to true crime analysis, or "Can you beat X while Y" when Y bears no impediment on the X.
I very nearly didn't watch it at all, Floydson obviously has the market cornered for this specific game/video style combo, but your style and narration are good enough to hold their own, so it's a shame you gimped yourself by using the format. If another was in the works I would sub, but your other content isn't of interest to me.
No offence intended by this, maybe it is cynicism - maybe 30 years online has jaded me to peoples intent when it comes to content creation - or maybe the dozens of "100 days" videos in the recommended have made me see a pattern.
Hey, if you make a part two, don't forget to stitch the parts together and release it again as "I survived 200 days - THE MOVIE" 😂
@@stykytte good lord. I had no intention of stitching the parts of it together to make it “the movie”. At the end of the day though, content creators generally gravitate to what brings views and revenue. Really not surprising that when a style or theme is trending different people try it out. At the end of the day though I’m going to do what I want 😉
Every damn time I see someone toss the body into the river makes me mad. Any random shmucks body fan tossed, the one Yorick tossed can actually have fat and blood removed to make the body all white skulls which slightly improves the time to improve the graveyard. Also first techs should always be “Hardspares” and “Softspares”
haha it's just a game. I get it, but I don't feel compelled to min/max everything :)
Reupload?
Yep I was doing some experiments with the video and ended up re-uploading it. Sorry for the duplicate notification.
@@CrypticFoxGaming Your good man, just curious. Was a fun video to watch the first time and will enjoy it again. lol. Might have to pick myself up Graveyard Keeper here soon because of it.
@@yellowsdotlxf Its a fun game if you like this kind of thing. Lots to do to keep you busy too
@@CrypticFoxGaming On my like 5th playthrough of Stardew and Valheim. So probably would at least play through Graveyard Keeper a few times knowing myself with those Farming life sim like games.
@@CrypticFoxGaming my son and I were excited for ep2 and it was a repeat. jebaited!
This is atleast the 3rd time this video has been deleted and reuploaded.
Shame on you fox, I thought you were better than to follow behaviour only usually done by scammers or really desperate.
Excuse me? I tested a comparison of the upload on my primary channel (this one) and my secondary channel to see if having this channel predominantly focuses on streams had a negative impact on uploaded content. Having tested that I deleted it and re-uploaded it here. Don’t propose to lecture me. If you don’t want to see it don’t click it.
@@CrypticFoxGaming Not trying to lecture anyone, but this doesn't excuse the fact the apparent same content was posted a total of three times with the same name and no other indication if it was different (part of a new series, test, etc).
The only way a viewer could tell was to watch it, a very cynical way many dodgy channels continue to use get views counts. So it was an experiment plus a mistake? Fine, i believe you.
Reason I was upset that it seemed so out of character for you and I've already seen other channels slide into obscurity all for views and viewer numbers, don't want to see your channel go down this slippery slope.
@@ErraticPT Well one would think given that's not how I act you would give me the benefit of the doubt as opposed to chastising me in some condescending manner.
@@ErraticPT Oh, but you were being disrespectful and condescending based on an assumption. Shame on you. You clearly didn't think he was "better than that" to assume the worst so quickly. IJS I can think of 5 things totally normal as to the reason why and none of them involve desperate or scammy intentions. (simple because this channel has never executed any scum tactics)